Add a Review

  • Had this been done over at 20th Century Fox which was at this time doing a lot of Latin American based musicals we'd have seen technicolor the better to show off Maureen O'Hara's fiery red tresses. Darryl Zanuck would have gotten a better score out of Rodgers&Hart than what was written for RKO.

    The threadbare plot consists of a couple of American cowboys in Argentina who are played by James Ellison and Buddy Ebsen. Ellison fails to get some oil leases from Don Robert Barrat. But he might be able to get both daughter Maureen O'Hara and a prize race horse from Barrat if he learns the customs of the gaucho culture and plays his cards right.

    Sadly Maureen doesn't sing and Ellison doesn't try. Ebsen has some nice numbers with Diosa Costello and there are a few ensemble numbers. Why didn't they get a singing leading man God only knows.

    They Met In Argentina doesn't stack up to what was being done with the same material over at 20th Century Fox.
  • Maureen O'Hara, James Ellison, Buddy Ebsen, Fortunio Bonanova, and by special demand Alberto Vila star in "They Met in Argentina," from 1941.

    A Texas oil millionaire wants oil lands in Argentina, but when he doesn't get them he sends his representative (Ellison) after a famous race horse. Ellison falls head over heels for the daughter of the horse's owner (O'Hara).

    What an annoying film. One rotten song after another - written by Rodgers & Hart? One of the great writing teams, and this music was unbearable.

    The role played by beautiful Maureen O'Hara could have been played by a chimpanzee. O'Hara had a lovely singing voice and she didn't sing a note in this. And let's just say that James Ellison doesn't quite measure up to O'Hara's other leading men which included John Wayne, Tyrone Power, Rex Harrison, James Stewart, and John Payne.

    The Argentinian government wouldn't allow the film to be released there unless footage of their big star, Alberto Vila, was added. It doesn't help.

    A very disappointing film with nothing to recommend it. And what is the point of having Maureen O'Hara in a movie if you're not going to film in color?
  • This musical is a real snore. How could the famous songwriting team of Rodgers and Hart write such insipid music? One would expect at least one song to rise to the level of American standard, but nothing here even comes close. The entire score isn't even tuneful—just blah.

    The love story never gets developed. How do the lead characters fall in love when they spend so little time with each other in the film? No love scenes, only one short kiss at the end of the movie.

    James Ellison sings one song, but Maureen O'Hara isn't used once. She actually could sing herself. She is used briefly in the production number, dancing with a partner, but she could actually dance. Her talents were wasted in this film.

    The entire production suffers from lack of Technicolor. The sets, costumes, and even the horses would have benefited. Yes, I know it was very expensive then. Oh well, even if it had been used, it couldn't have saved the dismal scriptwriting and lousy music.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Some Spanish melodys and the secondary romance of Buddy Ebsen and Diosa Costello is the only thing worth recommending in this completely forgettable archaon Musical that totally wastes its leading lady in a role that is completely inappropriate for her. The songs written by the Broadway team of Rodgers & Hart, just fresh off their groundbreaking "Pal Joey", are not up to their usual standard, and it's obvious that they wrote them quickly and sent them off to Hollywood just so they could meet a contractual obligation. if it wasn't for the dance numbers, including a big production towards the end, I would have given this a complete bomb.

    O'Hara is miscast as an Argentinian girl whose father agrees to sell a bull to visiting Texan James Ellison. They didn't need a Lupe Velez style temperament for this character. In fact, Dolores del Rio would have been perfect for this role. The temperament goes to the diminutive Costello who seems to come up to the middle of epson's chest during their romantic (and fight) scenes. It's obvious that O'Hara and Ellison will quickly get over their animosity towards each other.

    Alberto Vila, apparently a big Argentine star, gets the Spanish numbers and serves no real purpose in the plot other than to provide a slight romantic triangle which is never really developed. The musical numbers take up more than 20 minutes of the movie, which considering a plot makes that a nice distraction. Leslie Goodwin, who directed some of the "Mexican Spitfire" films, keeps the pace, but that's not enough to make this a movie worth recommending.
  • A forgettable story about an American businessman's (Ellison) attempts to purchase a racehorse from a rich Irish/South American , and his lovely daughter's (O'Hara) attempt to hook him at the same time, is merely an excuse for a top-notch musical comedy show. Buddy Ebsen is particularly funny as Ellison's Texan companion, and he gets to show off some snappy dancing, too. The bits that have been written here make Ebsen sort of a low-budget Will Rogers, but he makes the most of the opportunities and comes out shining. The script comes loaded with good jokes, and Ebsen has some of the best delivery (in classic vaudeville style) in the business.

    Rodgers and Hart contribute one of their least impressive scores -- only one or two good songs. They gave Ebsen a humorous cowboy ditty to sing (and he sings it poorly deliberately, let's hope), but their theme song ("North America.... meet South America" is but one of its blistering rhymes) is truly atrocious. There are also one or two more or less forgettable attempts by the songwriters to imitate the style of Jerome Kern in light operetta, sung by Ellison's rival for O'Hara's love. Since Ellison can't sing at all, SOMETHING must have swung the thing in his favor.....

    A likeable film emerges from the somewhat messy stew thanks to good comedy writing and playing.