User Reviews (54)

Add a Review

  • Charles Laughton's son moves out of the house, and Laughton moves out of the room he has shared with his wife, Rosalind Ivan. She's a shrill shrew, and he's glad to have a couple of doors separating them, except when she has at him in the halls and downstairs. He begins an innocent relationship with Ella Raines, but calls it off when his wife refuses to give him a divorce. That, however, is not enough for Miss Ivan. She has found out about Miss Raines, and she is going to make a public spectacle. So Laughton kills her.

    Matter improve immensely, and soon he has married Miss Raines.... and a good thing too, because Police Inspector Stanley Ridges concludes that Laughton is a murderer. The only problem -- from Ridges' perspective -- is he has no proof.

    Robert Siodmak's turn-of-the-century thriller has the advantage of several fine actors: not only Laughton, of course, but the under-rated Ella Raines, with Rosalind Ivan as a nasty piece of work. Nastiest of all is that expert in cold-featured evil, Henry Daniell. He's a decayed aristocrat who beats his wife, doesn't work, sneers at everyone and blackmails Laughton. No wonder meek and kindly Mr. Laughton is driven to murder!
  • Charles Laughton stars in director Robert Siodmak's excellent 1944 suspense thriller as a middle-aged shop manager in turn-of-the-century London who's driven to murder his shrewish wife when he falls in love with a beautiful young woman, and is then pursued by both a determined Scotland Yard detective and a blackmailing neighbor.

    Laughton gives one of his most subtle, controlled performances as a basically good man who turns murderous when his nagging wife threatens to expose his "friendship" with beautiful Ella Raines. Miss Raines is very appealing as his heart's desire, and looks quite beautiful in the period costumes. Rosalind Ivan, who has a similar role as Edward G. Robinson's emasculating wife in Fritz Lang's 'Scarlet Street,' 1945, is excellent as the nagging wife. And Henry Daniell and Molly Lamont also offer top support as Laughton's no-account neighbor and his abused wife.

    An excellent story of murder and blackmail that will appeal to fans of both Hitchcock-like thrillers and the marvelous Charles Laughton.
  • The Suspect is directed by Robert Siodmak and adapted to screenplay by Bertram Millhauser and Arthur T. Horman from the novel "This Way Out" written by James Ronald. It stars Charles Laughton, Ella Raines, Dean Harens, Stanley Ridges, Henry Daniell and Rosalind Ivan. Music is by Frank Skinner and cinematography by Paul Ivano.

    In 1902 Edwardian London, unhappily married shopkeeper Philip Marshall (Laughton) meets beautiful Mary Gray (Raines) and a tender friendship begins to form. But once Philip's wife discovers what is going on she threatens him with exposure and scandal, forcing Philip to take drastic action...

    How delightfully off, that a film that features a wife murderer, an alcoholic wife beater, and blackmail, should be so restrained and actually beautiful. The Suspect in principal is about a decent man pushed to do bad things by his awful life, a man who then finds hope springs from a most unlikely source. The moral shadings here are most intricate, Laughton's Philip Marshal is a completely sympathetic and fascinating character, and so the makers deftly toy with our perceptions in the process.

    There's no mystery element to drive the story forward, we are only really left wondering how the finale will play out. However, the lack of mystery is not a problem, for the astute and wily Siodmak has a keen eye for suspense and he knows how to use gaslight interiors and foggy streets to represent the psychological turmoil of Philip and his life that's now drastically changing. Murder as justifiable homicide? Ridding the world of bad people is OK? Rest assured that this is far darker than it appears on the surface.

    Brilliantly performed by Laughton and Raines, and mounted with great atmospheric skill by Siodmak, The Suspect is a little seen gem waiting to be found by a wider audience. 8/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The one great "crime passionale" of British murder cases is the 1910 murder of Cora "Belle Elmore" Crippen, wife of the American born "Dr." Hawley Harvey "Peter" Crippen. The couple had been married from the early 1890s, and moved from the United States to England, settling in London. Crippen was the possessor of a degree from a small medical college in the midwest, but he really was on shaky ground as a physician under British standards (or the standards of a major American city for that matter). In fact, he was a seller of patent medicines, and practiced some opthalmology and dentistry under questionable auspices. But he was a good businessman, and made a comfortable living. Cora had pretensions of being an opera singer, and trained her voice. She did have some performances at various music halls, but her career was mediocre at best. She also treated the long suffering, mild Crippen as dirt, making him clean up her lover's shoes when they slept over at their home. Crippen hired a secretary, Ethel Le Neve, and they fell in love. In January 1910 Belle disappeared. Her friends became concerned, and Crippen told them she had left him. Later he told them that she died in Los Angelas. But when Le Neve was seen wearing her jewelry they became suspicious. Contacting Scotland Yard about their suspicions, the Yard sent Inspector Walter Dew to see what was going on. At first Crippen seemed plausible, but then he and Le Neve fled. The remains of Belle were found in the basement. She had been poisoned. Crippen and Le Neve (disguised as his son) fled by ocean liner to Canada, followed by Dew, who arrested them off Quebec. They were taken back to England, where both were tried. The Doctor partly tied up his defense by insisting on protecting Le Neve. As a result he was found guilty and she was acquitted. The Doctor was hanged in November 1910.

    A movie was made, with Donald Pleasance as Crippen, and there have been films based on the story such as WE ARE NOT ALONE with Paul Muni. But this film with Charles Laughton is considered the best. Laughton captures the basic decency of the central figure, who made a bad marriage to a shrew, and fell for a decent woman too late. There are differences in the story. Rosalind Ivan (playing the "Belle" character) is not poisoned (like Flora Robson in the Muni film) but dies in an apparent accident falling downstairs. Laughton has a son who one suspects will marry the Le Neve figure after the film ends. And Laughton never even gets to see Canada, but gives himself up in England to save a neighbor suspected of killing her husband (a blackmailer Laughton has killed - another plot innovation not involved in the actual crime). But the film moves well, and one constantly feels for Laughton's character. Finally the fine Stanley Ridges gives a typically good performance as the counterpart of Inspector Walter Dew, who ended up sympathizing with the man whom he captured.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    ....so says Cora Marshall (Rosalind Ivan) to her husband Philip (Charles Laughton) as she bewails the bickering state of their marriage. He happens to meet Mary (Ella Raines) and they begin a relationship which Cora finds out about and threatens Philip and Mary. Soon Cora is dead and the tension starts racking up until the last tense scenes. Is Philip a crooked tree or not? It is a good film, not particularly original, but engrossing.

    Set in Hollywood's London where the fog billows around it looks good and Frank Skinner's musical score swirls around nicely too. Director Robert Siodmak knows how to make this kind of film. ('The Killers' of 1946 is his masterpiece) very well and this is no exception.

    Laughton is excellent in his role as a kindly man caught up in a bad marriage who meets a younger woman and he holds one's sympathy right to the end. He underplays the role all for the better. Rosalind Ivan as his wife is wonderfully acid and Henry Daniell (Mr Simmons) is good too as a drunk who hits his wife, a rather pathetic but deeply selfish man. Molly Lamont who plays Daniell's wife also shines.

    Well worth watching.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In 1932, Charles Laughton appeared in a thriller called "Payment Deferred" where he is a suspect in the murder of his wife over his feelings towards a much younger woman. The wife in that film was soft spoken and gentle compared to the shew here, played with hateful bitterness by Rosalind Ivan to the 100th degree of hamminess. Laughton is soft spoken and gentle, but the moment their son leaves the house (to an abundance of cackling happiness by the unforgiving Ivan), Laughton moves into the now empty bedroom, simply responding to his wife's demands to know why that the answer might frighten her. At his office, Laughton shows compassion to a young boy runner who has been pinching coin for sweet treats and a young woman (Ella Raines) who is despondent over her personal situation.

    But even a milquetoast like Laughton has his breaking point, and if there's ever been a wife who has crossed a line, it's the miserable Ivan. The light in Laughton's eyes comes back as he spends time with Raines, ignoring his unhappy home life. The demise of Ivan is played out subtly (offscreen) yet giving doubt to the audience whether Laughton was responsible or not. The truth is up to Scotland Yard detective Stanley Ridges, as shrewd as Ivan the Terrible was shrewish. Considering that Edward G. Robinson got the Ivan treatment in "Scarlet Street" right afterwards, I'm surprised that the British stage vet didn't pin a clause with her agent for no more harpy wives.

    The 1902 London atmosphere is beautifully captured, most subtly without the excessive cockney accents and overabundance of eccentrics. As directed by Robert Siodmark, this is a rare period film noir with a touch of Gothic thriller as well. The details into every major character is perfectly laid out, with small little hints even in Ivan who is hypocritically moral in denying her own failures with her marriage to Laughton. Only a few well filmed scenes of fog add onto that cliché. This is one of the superb unsung classics that deserves to be regarded as a near masterpiece.
  • Unlike the grim dramas of Fritz Lang Edward G. Robinson played in (Scarlet Street and The Woman In the Window) Charles Laughtons' character of a genteel middle aged and middle class Englishman of the early 20th Century seems to be a figure of strength and solidity. The only thing to ruin this is a classic harridan of a wife at home. A loveless marriage that has produced a son the only point of agreement this couple has agreed to in the two decades + of this anchor on Mr. Marshall's soul. Then comes the heavenly disaster of love in the form of newly unemployed Ella Raines. No Joan Bennett sexpot/wench as in Woman In the Window,but a Good and proper English girl down on her luck who meets the kindly Mr. Marshall who at first is only doing the Good Deed that has earned him the respect of his neighborhood. But when you have the Nag from Hell(played to the nines by an icy shrewish Rosiland Ivans) and Henry Daniells as your pseudo-Gentleman stumblebum in the area Deep Trouble for the Good Man awaits. Add in Stanley Ridges performance as a Scotland Yard Inspector who Sherlock Holmes would respect as an equal,and you have a very distinct and classy journey down the Boulevard of Bad Choices for Good Reasons. Daniell's realization (too late)that Mr. Marshall has steel in his backbone is Movie Cool.
  • I'm converted to the YouTube cause. If it wasn't for YouTube I may never had seen this jewel, with a performance by the extraordinary Charles Laughton that is nothing short of magnificent. The tenderness of the man! Director Robert Siodmak creates a perfect noir without low blows or gimmicks. Ella Raines is lovely as the object of his affection and Rosalind Ivan is priceless as the awful wife. The last shot is pure Laughton and his personal struggle for integrity. Loved it.
  • sol-13 April 2017
    Unhappily married to bitter woman who refuses to divorce him, an aging Londoner is eventually driven to kill his wife; he succeeds in staging the death as an accident, but a rugged detective declines to let the matter go in this Robert Siodmak thriller. The film features some great directional touches, such as how Siodmak refrains from showing us the murder, instead leaving everything implied by the protagonist simply grabbing a cane and looking up a staircase in deep thought. What really makes the film work though is Charles Laughton's measured lead performance. Through the gentlest of eye movements and subtlest vocal inflections, Laughton manages to render his character so human and down-to-earth that it is easy to root for him throughout, even when he commits unspeakable acts. His battle of wits with the detective are very good too, with Laughton positioned to bluntly state "why don't you arrest me?" after being hounded so relentlessly by the policeman. The supporting cast is not quite up to Laughton's level, with Rosalind Ivan very one-note as his wife in a performance that only requires her to be shrill. The film is also rather slow to warm up with around half an hour elapsing before the murder. Once the film gets going though, it never lets up. It is simply enthralling to watch and the suggestive final shot provides a pitch perfect note for the film to end on.
  • An excellent domestic drama about a middle-aged man (Charles Laughton) who is trapped in an insufferable marriage. Laughton captures all the mannerisms of the situation, with a happy face for the neighbors masking his true torment. The story gets pushed along when he meets a younger woman (Ella Raines) and starts a relationship, which his devious wife (Rosalind Ivan) finds out about, sending him to the point of panic when she threatens him with social and financial ruin. The next door neighbor (Molly Lamont) is also trapped in an absysmal marriage to an alcoholic and abusive husband (Henry Daniell). One wonders why the writers didn't have Laughton and Lamont as the focus, as she's everything his wife isn't, instead of Raines. It would have saved the movie from becoming another police crime story. In any event, the chemistry seems to work pretty well, with Daniell and Ivan each in their own outstanding way supplying enough venom to propel the movie along, and Laughton excellent as a good man pushed into a corner.
  • The quality of The Suspect is entirely dependent on the performance of Charles Laughton. Thankfully, he is a legendary talent and can perfectly execute this character. He makes Philip a man who seems somewhat timid, but exceedingly kind. Yet at the same time there is an edge to the character that makes it believable he might be capable of a heinous crime. If there was one thing I wish came into play more in the film, it would be that they sustain the question of whether or not Philip was guilty for a longer period of time. I know Laughton could have done this tightrope walk of a performance which would leave the audience questioning whether they should trust him, and that kind of murder mystery is more interesting to me.

    The Suspect doesn't contain a ton of surprises, and that means the plot is a bit predictable. I felt like I had seen this kind of movie before, however this was a stellar example of the story. Alongside the brilliant Charles Laughton was a superb performance from Stanley Ridges as the detective investigating a death. In fact, any mystery or surprise that came into the movie was brought in by him. There was actually one scene towards the end where the movie caught me off guard, and left me guessing for a moment, and I think Ridges' performance was what sold it for me. While there is a chance that you've seen a movie with some similarities to The Suspect, I still would recommend people check it out. Even if it is familiar, it does the tropes with great style and class. Also, it has slipped into the public domain, so you can watch it free on Youtube.
  • "The Suspect" is a taut suspenser, grandly acted by Charles Laughton and fine cast, and beautifully produced. But who can see it? Unfortunately, for some strange reason, the film was never brought out on video format. This comment is written to hopefully create some interest in helping to rectify this void. With all the less capable films on video, this is one omission which needs to be seriously addressed. ###
  • The Suspect (1944) : Brief Review -

    Wins my vote for Robert Siodmak's best Crime Noir Ever! It proves that human conscience and decency can be kept intact in crime dramas. Robert Siodmak's filmography has very few films that can be recommended, and The Suspect will be in my top 5 for sure. I don't care how much "The Killers" (1946) and "Criss Cross" (1949) were lauded by critics and audiences, those dumb femme fatales never made it to my list of top favourite Hollywood films from the decade. The Killers was still a good watch because the supporting characters made a big difference, and I shall not forget to mention "The Spiral Staircase" (1949) for its quivering climax. But today, I feel that The Suspect has come out as a big surprise to me and has surpassed these films comfortably. It's one of those rare crime noirs where two of the best human qualities - decency and conscience - are used perfectly. It lacks the thrill and drama factors for the same reason, and frankly, it didn't bother me at all, like it did others. Based on the 1939 novel This Way Out by James Ronald, The Suspect is about an unhappily married man who begins a flirtation with a younger woman. When his wife threatens to ruin her, he decides to take action, expectably, but things don't end there. The screenplay here is engaging despite a few long cuts that might feel boring. Otherwise, you don't have any boring moments. The writing is top-notch with a lot of human thoughts involved in it, and most of the time it's about understanding them even if the characters don't speak on them. Charles Laughton is superb in the lead role, and Ella Raines just doesn't look beautiful, but also performs beautifully. Robert Siodmak has made a meaningful film in a time when others were more inclined towards highly dramatic films, and I must appreciate him for that. But anyway, it's a fantastic film and very much recommendable. That last walk is truly something!

    RATING - 7.5/10*

    By - #samthebestest.
  • begob15 July 2017
    An unhappy husband has an affair with a young woman, but what will he do when his wife finds out?

    Simple tale of greed and murder that fails to plumb the depths. At first I thought there was a clever misdirection on who would turn out to be the villain, but no - this just coasts along in an understated way, with little intrigue or complexity. There is one suspenseful scene involving a cat, but that's about it.

    Other reviewers praise the restraint of the director in the murder scenes, and I'm fine with that, but what seemed to leave room for ambiguity turned out to be nothing more than self-censorship. In fact the second scene was a little confusing, leaving unintended doubt as to whether the victim was dead.

    Laughton gives a good performance, but even he couldn't provide a flash of insight into this character. As for the other actors, there really wasn't much for anyone to work with. It's a shortish run time and quite underwhelming. Only thing to praise is the sets.

    Overall: Sober and forgettable melodrama.
  • And it was a very good try, too. It had many of the elements of a Hitchcock movie that make them so enjoyable. Plus, this one starred Charles Laughton, one of the best, although I can't picture him working for Hitchcock. I would think there would be the inevitable clash of personalities which would prevent such a matchup.

    "The Suspect" is about a milquetoast married to a shrewish wife who hounds him until decides to take drastic measures. In the meantime, he meets Ella Raines. She is unemployed, he is smitten. (Put two and two together here). The milquetoast is played to perfection by Laughton, and his wife is played in the same manner by Rosalind Ivan.

    Now comes an UnHitchcock-like development in the person of the Scotland Yard detective, played with an extremely heavy hand by Stanley Ridges. After introducing himself to Laughton, he immediately reenacts a supposed murder scene without even taking off his coat. He continues his seemingly unmotivated investigation for the rest of the picture, culminating in a completely far-fetched and disappointing ending.

    That said, the picture is completely absorbing, made even more so by Laughton and by a terrific job in support by Henry Daniell, Laughton's alcoholic neighbor. I just think a better ending would have helped this movie to an even better final rating.
  • This film begins with a kind-hearted gentleman by the name of "Philip Marshall" (Charles Laughton) trying to console his adult son "John Marshall" (Dean Harens) after an argument he had with Philip's wife "Cora Marshall" (Rosalind Ivan). It is then revealed that Cora is an extremely critical person who doesn't just bicker with her own son but behaves even worse with her husband. So much so, that Philip doesn't even want to sleep in the same room with her anymore--which only supplies her even more ammunition to use against him. Be that as it may, the scene then shifts to an attractive young woman named "Mary Gray" (Ella Raines) entering the store where Philip works to inquire about a job. Unfortunately, Philip has to inform her that there are no openings within the company but wishes her the best, all the same. That evening, he happens to find her crying on a park bench and, being the compassionate person that he is, offers to buy her dinner and listen to her problems. One thing leads to another and after several weeks they become quite enamored with one another. Needless to say, Cora begins to get suspicious and after some thorough snooping on her part, angrily informs Philip that she intends to sully Mary's reputation--despite his assertions that nothing untoward had developed between them. That same night, Cora is killed by an apparent fall from the top of the stairs. And although the coroner considers her death accidental, a detective by the name of "Inspector Huxley" (Stanley Ridges) is not totally convinced and the more he learns the more certain he becomes of foul play. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this turned out to be a surprisingly good film noir due in large part to the performance of Charles Laughton who played his part extremely well. Having said that, I feel confident in recommending this movie to those who might be interested, and I have rated it accordingly. Above average.
  • Well, I won't bother to summarize what unfolds in this excellent suspense film starring the incredibly talented Charles Laughton, since other reviewers above have done so quite nicely, and have also touted the film's good qualities. I just watched my old VHS copy (taped off TV) last night (sort of fuzzy, but better than nothing). Why on earth Universal Pictures does not release this little gem on DVD, which it richly deserves, I will never understand. I am sure many discerning film buffs and Laughton fans would buy it in a New York minute. And, I mustn't forget to comment on how marvellously Rosalind Ivan portrays the wife from hell.
  • CinemaSerf24 February 2023
    Charles Laughton is super in this thriller telling the tale of a man in a loveless marriage to a harridan of a women, "Cora" - really well portrayed by Rosalind Ivan, whose relentless nagging has managed to drive their son from home. When he innocently meets a young lady "Mary" (Ella Raines) his wife determines to ruin their friendship - and his career - so he sets about stopping her. Permanently! Henry Daniell is good as the suspicious "Gilbert Simmons' as is Stanley Ridges as "Insp. Huxley" who has to investigate this mischief and it moves along well until an ending with quite an unexpected twist. Still have never found a rotten Laughton film.
  • AAdaSC8 February 2010
    Philip Marshall (Charles Laughton) is trapped in a loveless marriage and his wife Cora (Rosalind Ivan) refuses to grant him a divorce. He meets Mary (Ella Raines) and they embark on a romance of friendship before he puts an end to it because of his married status. Meanwhile, Cora has discovered the secret and jumps to a wrong conclusion vowing to humiliate both him and Mary in both their workplaces and their social sets. Cora has an accident and dies. Phillip and Mary are now free to live together but Inspector Huxley (Stanley Ridges) suspects murder.

    This is an atmospheric thriller where the viewer is in complete sympathy with the suspect. The cast are all very good with the exception of John Marshall (Dean Harens) and his annoying girlfriend. Why has he got an American accent when he is supposed to be English? Anyway, the rest of the cast give their characters real depth so that we dislike those that we are meant to - Rosalind Ivan as Laughton's wife and neighbour Gilbert (Henry Daniell) - and like the main characters of Laughton and Raines.....and you always think "Oh no" whenever Inspector Huxley appears on the scene.......if only he wasn't so inquisitive and determined.........It's a good film and Laughton is both funny and charming - the scenes between him and his wife are very entertaining.
  • The gritting and thrilling plot concerns the relation among a few characters , the unlucky husband , his shrewish wife , an innocent femme fatale , a suspicious detective and wife-beating good-for-nothing neighbour . Set in Edwardian England, in 1902 London, middle-aged Philip Marshall (Charles Laughton) is unhappily married to demanding wife called Cora (Rosalind Ivan) . She has already driven their young adult son John (Dean Harens) away from home . The unhappily married man begins a flirtation with an unemployed , depressed younger woman named Mary Gray (Ella Raines) who he meets at the street . Thereafter , fortune seems to smile on him . Their deepening friendship, though physically innocent, is discovered by Philip's wife, who threatens him with exposure and scandal, driving him to grisly events , resulting in dark happenings . When his wife threatens to ruin her , he decides to take action . As a subsequent investigation is carried out by a stubborn police inspector (Stanley Ridges) into the circumstances that led to the fateful consequences . As the investigator uncovers his past involvement with a young woman and some surprising clues . His was a strange Secret ! Hers was a strange Love!

    Splendidly classic noir film with a host of well-known actors who contribute to the movie's success . This noir film packs action , thrills , suspense , tension , thundering drama and a mighty punch in some exciting scenes . The characters are etched some intricate moral shadings and some teasing reflections on manipulation emerge from within the narrative , echoing the virtuoso audience . This is a notable Film Noir well written by Bertram Millhauser , adapted by Arthur T. Horman from a novel by James Ronald , a master work competently directed by expert filmmaker Robert Siodmak . Film Noir is a particular style of film , containing an enjoyable story-telling bathed in light and shadow and dealing with the darker doings of mankind . Dealing with guilt , opression , blackmail , and killing in turn-of-the-century London's quiet Laburnum Terrace . The plot specifies of ¨The Suspect¨ inevitably evoke Hitchcock's world , even if the studio choice of noir specialist Siodmak as director suggests a more darkly labyrinthine atmosphere . As it turns out , the generic common denominator psychological suspense proves stronger than the auteurist imprint , and if any individual has a right to sign the movie , standing out Charles Laughton as a likeable wife-killer and victim of blackmail , whose fatal flaw is eventually revealed to be his sense of simple decency . Along with the great Charles Laughton shows up the attractive Ella Raines and other nice secondaries as Stanley Ridges , Dean Harens , Henry Daniell , Molly Lamont and Rosalind Ivan as the shrew wife .

    It contains an atmospheric , evocative cinematography in black and white by cameraman Paul Ivano . As well a thrilling and suspenseful musical score by Frank Skinner . The motion picture was compellingly directed by Robert Siodmak who realizes a skillful filmmaking . He had a long career , as Robert was a good director who made a lot of films in all kinds of genres as Quick , Son of Dracula , Chistmas holydays , The strange affair of uncle Harry , The file of Thelma Jordan , The great sinner, The crimson pirate , The devil strikes at night , Custer of the west . Outstanding in Noir Film as Phantom lady , Criss cross , The suspect , The dark mirror , The killers , Cry of the city , among others . Robert directed Burt Lancaster in two classic Noir films titled ¨The Killers¨ and ¨Criss Cross¨. It's a good film that ensures the nervous intrigue never lets up from the first moment and realized in efficient style by Robert Siodmak , then at the peak of his Hollywood career . The picture will appeal to Charles Laughton and Ella Raines fans .
  • I finally got to see The Suspect one of the few Charles Laughton films I had not yet seen. I was totally bowled over by what he did in this film. It's really what film acting is all about, every breath, every nuance, every gesture is carefully delineated and brought to the screen. Laughton had a reputation for driving some of his directors a little nuts with his perfectionism and maybe he did to Robert Siodmark here. I prefer to think the two of them collaborated on a masterpiece.

    The setting is Edwardian London in 1902. From outward appearances Laughton is a happy man, making a good living with a wife and a grown son. But he is married to one shrew of a woman he's put up with for over 20 years. He's ripe for a midlife crisis and ripe to stray. But a friendship he develops with pretty young Ella Raines recently hired at Laughton's office drives wife Rosalind Ivan up a wall. Later on Ivan dies as a result of a fall down the house stairs. Nobody can prove one way or the other whether it was murder. Scotland Yard's Stanley Ridges is up a wall with it.

    Laughton and Ivan have a couple of neighbors, married couple Henry Daniell and Molly Lamont. When Ridges confides in Daniell during the course of the investigation, he inadvertently sets the stage for tragedy. Daniell himself says he's a 'total rotter' and proves it the audience's satisfaction.

    The Suspect is one of many films based on the famous Dr. Crippen murder which was also in the same period. The only fault with the film is that the rest of the cast is fairly one dimensional in their characters next to Charles Laughton. But if you are a Laughton fan, this film is an absolute must.
  • I saw this film for the first time today (21/9/10) mainly to see one of my American film heroines, Ella Raines.As other reviewers have observed this film does not appear on DVD, at least I have not seen it before and I regularly check availability of 1940s films which are my speciality.I finally saw it on "Youtube.com".Ella had a unique, genuine & generous quality, which comes through in all her films which I have seen and which no amount of acting can disguise.This quality is almost a blueprint which is with you for life and film producers must have noticed this quality in Ella when casting her in roles.Two examples, see "Impact" & La Dama Desconocida".

    The plot and similarities with the celebrated Dr. Crippen trial of 1910 have already been outlined by other reviewers.Of course the wretched moral code was in force in 1944, but the producers at least left one in some doubt of the denouement and great sympathy for Charlie Laughton's character.My only criticism was the obvious use of American actors playing British parts which rather grates on me.Bear in mind this was 1944 and us Brits were doing useful things like helping to win the war.At the time American actresses like Gwyneth Paltrow, Renee Zellweger & others were not around who could do convincing British accents.That is why I prefer to see Ella playing American characters on her home ground and why I awarded this film 6/10, as above average
  • AlsExGal7 February 2021
    Warning: Spoilers
    ... in that it examines what can happen when a decent man finds himself cornered by an awful person. In this case, however, the "awful person" is the protagonist's wife! It is 1902 England, and Philip Marshall (Charles Laughton) is the manager of a successful tobacco shop. You see his decency right off the bat. He calls into account a messenger boy whose accounts are missing a penny here and there. He lectures the boy about how these things start out small and grow unmanageable, but ultimately lets the child off the hook with a warning it must never happen again. This is a bit of foreshadowing for Philip's character.

    At home you can see that Philip's wife, Cora, probably has her picture next to the word "shrew" in the dictionary, even alienating their grown son. But remember it is virtually impossible to get a contested divorce in Edwardian England.

    And this is where one thing begins to lead to another. Philip meets a young woman, Mary (Ella Raines), they strike up a friendship that is becoming more than that, but Philip's wife Cora would feel her life incomplete if not torturing some man, so she refuses to divorce him. Then Cora tells Philip she has found out what is going on and plans to announce it to everybody the next day. In Edwardian England both Philip and Mary would be fired and unemployable from that point. Funny how Cora doesn't wonder how she'll make out with Philip impoverished. But I digress.

    Thus Philip must murder Cora and make it look like an accident to keep her quiet. You don't see what happened, but Cora is dead, and it looks like Philip is in the clear. Unfortunately Philip is saddled with the Scotland Yard version of Columbo. And so the friendship turned to romance leads to murder, which leads to Philip becoming a suspect, which leads to him having to resort to other crimes to keep his original crime from being found out.

    This somewhat reminds me of "Scarlet Street" of the following year, except Laughton's character is actually less imperfect than Edward G. Robinson's character, and their situations lead them down different paths. And although Laughton does cross a line that most of us would find unthinkable, it is his decency that is his undoing in the end. Highly recommended.
  • Despite yet another tremendous performance from Charles Laughton, and Robert Siodmak's steady hand and eye for photography, there are several elements of 'The Suspect' that are hard to swallow.

    Laughton plays a wealthy old gentleman with a shrew of a wife, and he's ready to move on. He meets a lovely young lady played by Ella Raines and is spurred into action, leading to a twisted and tragic series of events.

    The acting is fine, and there are some brilliantly dark and suspenseful moments. My problem is, I found the wife character to be far too terrible to be believed. Even husbands and wives who grow to despise each other can be terrible, but have good sides.

    And as much as Laughton can make you feel for the character and pull off a certain charm, it's still hard to buy the relationship between he and Ella Raines. She needed to be either a money-grubber or totally naive and easily manipulated to pull it off.

    Regardless, it's a competent film, with some good photography. There are some entertaining moments. It's notable, but not a major film.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I do not know about this one. In theory, it is well made film. The story is more of a classical noir with a lot of questions and than answers. Lot of implied hints and circle of faiths. Which in theory, I would have loved BUT I guess I am conflicted with how the morality of the film played out. The titular suspect is treated as unholy likeable and everyone who hates him are portrayed negatively, which detracts me with a lot things about the movie. I would say the acting (especially for Laughton) was shockingly sublime and fits really well with how the film was presented.

    But again I do not know about the film's morality. Its an interesting take but gives him too much free pass for the things that he will be doing (including to the implied stuff too).
An error has occured. Please try again.