Two Smart People (1946) User Reviews (18)

Lucille Ball in the lead, Karl Freund behind the camera, and directed by Dessin!

[secondtake · 7/10 · 8 September 2013]

Two Smart People (1946)

An odd, charming, crime romance with a series of great locales and a real sense of love triumphs over everything. You might expect this from MGM somehow--it lacks the intensity we think of with Warner Bros. crime flicks--but it has more warmth and aura that critics give it credit for. And when it gets to the crazy Mardi Gras scenes, it's really pretty fun.

The star here is Lucille Ball. Yes, the comic queen of the 1950s in a dramatic role, and she's convincing, despite the fact that she was unhappy to be in the film (she knew it was her last with MGM). Ball actually made a lot of films before television took her to the top, and she's always really good if never quite sizzling or memorable. She (and everyone) blames the weak script for her lackluster appearance here, but I thought the whole mood of the movie took on its own life and it worked well. The cinematography is led by legendary Karl Freund who later filmed 149 "I Love Lucy" episodes and who had already shot classic movies like "Metropolis," "Dracula," and would later do "Key Largo."

Across from Ball in the romantic male lead is John Hodiak, who tries to light up the screen but seems to be slightly trying, as if he knows the kind of charming con man he is meant to be and can't quite "become" it. Still, he's likable, and his chemistry with Ball isn't bad. A third lead has to be mentioned, Lloyd Nolan, because he's the laid back cop who is the most at ease in the film, and who is used to bounce the romance off of.

It's true, the script, both the dialog and plot, are routine stuff. But don't let that worry you. The ploy of the stolen bonds hidden in the book (seen in the first scene) is a little overdone as it goes (with a small twist in the final minutes), but it's really just a way to keep a slight suspense going. As the two leads fall for each other in the most impossible circumstance, there is the feeling that maybe the bonds are really the goal, and not true love. Great character actor Elisha Cook Jr. is creeping around in the background, waiting for the money to turn up.

Like many post-war films, the filming here is intensely moody, sharp, and filled with moving camera. It's a pleasure just to watch. Director Jules Dassin has several truly great films to his credit, and this one is usually brushed off as a failure of sorts, but I wouldn't do that. I enjoyed every minute. Even when there were cracks in the plot, I still wanted to be there, to go along for the ride. And that's good enough!

nice chemistry between Ball and Hodiak

[blanche-2 · 6/10 · 11 September 2018]

This was Lucille Ball's final film for MGM. Though she didn't like it, she's very good and has nice chemistry with John Hodiak. They are ably supported by Elisha Cook, Jr., and Lloyd Nolan.

Con man Hodiak is headed back to prison on a train with detective Nolan when they meet con woman Ball. Gangster Cook wants the bonds Hodiak is hiding. The two leads fall for one another. There is a long Mardi Gras scene at the end of the film. Ball looks fantastic in the festival gowns.

Light fun. Directed by Jules Dassin without the flair that would make him one of the great directors.

Lucy and Hodiak kind-of-noir from the 1940s

[ksf-2 · 6/10 · 17 August 2014]

Oil paintings and oil wells. Ricki ( Lucy) and her friend "Ace" are somehow involved in selling things. John Hodiak is "Ace" Connors, and he and Ricki are trying to sell oil wells or paintings, but neither one seems to be authentic, so the buyers back out, and then there are the mysterious missing bonds. Elisha Cook is the dark horse "Feletti". It's all very 1940s noirish, with Lucy all dolled up in fancy costumes, and many things are only partially explained. They all meet on a train when Bob Simms (Lloyd Nolan), is bringing Connors in for justice. Simms tells Ricki why they are on the train, and tries to get her on his side. Then, they end up on the Mexican side of the border. Now, they are all at a Mardi Gras party. Wow, they sure have a lot of adventures for someone on their way to Sing Sing; it's all in good fun as we wait to see if Simms, Feletti, or someone else will find the stolen bonds. You have to really pay attention or you'll miss important details. It's more of a get-away adventure than a who-dunnit. It's okay, but not a lot of meat on the bones of this story. This was a couple years before I Love Lucy. They hardly ever show this one, but her best films were Long Long Trailer, Big Street, Fuller Brush Girl, and Meet the People. Hodiak had just done Hitchcock's Lifeboat, and Harvey Girls.

Directed by Jules Dassin, nominated for two Oscars for "Pote tin Kyriaki" 1960. He had also directed Rififi and Topkapi, and was harassed by the House Unamerican Activities Committee in the 1950s. Looks like this is the only time Dassin and Lucy worked on a project together.

Signpost to noir

[michael.e.barrett · 21 October 2002]

This obscure B-movie was Jules Dassin's last film before embarking on a series of classic noir and crime films--and actually it's the first of his crime films and shows his interest in developing the genre. As another critic reports in a previous post, this film is NOT a comedy (as Maltin's book describes it) about two con artists mixed up "in art forgery." Actually, it's a crime/road movie about stolen bonds, co-written by the creator of "The Saint." True, Lucille Ball co-stars, and she and John Hodiak meet cute in a TROUBLE IN PARADISE manner, blowing each other's cons with a mutual pigeon. But from the first shot, Dassin reveals his interest in crime

Like Dassin's forgettable comedy A LETTER FOR EVIE, this film is shot by the great Karl Freund, in decline from his silent heyday and not yet arrived at his groundbreaking I LOVE LUCY three-camera period. He gives us expressionist shots aplenty, and such privileged moments as a pan shot with window reflection from outside a train, a cactus-by-moonlight scene, and a chiaroscuro moment when Ball is menaced by Elisha Cook Jr lighting a match. The presence of Cook, Lloyd Nolan, and Hugo Haas (on their way to being entrenched noir icons) also counts for something. The road trip plot (on a train) allows stops in Mexico and New Orleans. The last third (set at Mardi Gras) is suspenseful and colorful, with Cook in fool's motley.

In conclusion, if this 1946 film doesn't hold up as well as Dassin's later, truer noirs, we can still see it's an early step in the development of that genre.

Make it 7.5

[JohnHowardReid · 7/10 · 8 November 2014]

Produced on an expensive budget by Ralph Wheelwright for M-G-M, with beautiful photography by Karl Freund and gorgeous sets by Wade Rubottom, this screenplay by Leslie Charteris and Ethel Hill is as thrilling, fast-paced and full of surprising twists as any "Saint" novel. It's well directed too – by none other than Jules Rififi Dassin. Admittedly, this pic doesn't quite have the flair of Dassin's later work. For example, I'm sure the more experienced Dassin would have used a low angle in the mardi gras shots rather than the high angle he employs here. However, I have no complaints against the skillful film editing, or against the players. In fact, Lucille Ball delivers an excellent performance – and never looked lovelier. Available on an excellent Warner Archive DVD.

"Snap out of it beautiful. Get that Mexican moonlight out of your eyes!"

[utgard14 · 6/10 · 16 October 2023]

In Leonard Maltin's review for this film he complains that "laughs don't come very often." I should hope not since this isn't a comedy. Seriously you have to wonder about people sometimes. This is a romantic drama with some noirish touches to it. It reminds me a little of Angels Over Broadway and Remember the Night. Both are great movies so that's definitely a compliment. John Hodiak isn't my first choice for leading man but he's a good fit for this part, unfortunate mustache notwithstanding. Lucille Ball has never been more beautiful than here and does well with a character more complex than the norm for the time. Fine support from pros like Lloyd Nolan and Elisha Cook, Jr. I enjoyed this one quite a bit. My rating may seem slightly low for the praise but I always struggle getting over the 6 to 7 hump. I'll probably raise my score next time I watch it. That's often how it goes with me. Anyway, good movie check it out. Someone tell Leonard Maltin to do the same.

Willing Suspension of Disbelief? How about MANDATORY?

[bbrebozo · 6/10 · 1 June 2014]

In order to enjoy this movie, you have to start out with the understanding that the plot makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE! A convicted con man (John Hodiak) convinces a stupid police officer who is accompanying him to prison (Lloyd Nolan) to make it a leisurely first class trip together -- by way of New Orleans, Mexico, and some top notch night clubs and restaurants. Apparently this is the idiot cop's brilliant way of trying to loosen up the con man and trick him into revealing where he has hidden some valuable bonds. Add a beautiful con woman (Lucille Ball) who finds out about the bonds from the idiot cop, complete changes in personality on the part of the key characters near end of the film, and a particularly ridiculous non-explanation for how the bonds were recovered at the finale. It's a lot for a reasonably intelligent mind to discard.

But if you can, there are some notable performances. Lucille Ball is very believable in a non-comic, romantic role. She was quite a hot-cha-cha back in the day, if you can get Lucy Ricardo out of your head (another one of the mental challenges this movie presents). Lloyd Nolan plays his usual straight arrow, trustworthy role so convincingly that it's hard to believe that he makes so many dumb decisions and gets into so many stupid jams during the trip. It's almost like he's the world's most unfunny member of the Three Stooges. I never understood why the con man didn't just escape with the bonds during one of the many moments when Nolan was distracted, then come back and get Lucille Ball later if he was so in love with her.

I was impressed with the solid acting job that John Hodiak did as the con man, so I looked him up on the internet to find out why he didn't become a bigger star, and sadly discovered that he died fairly young. He did a good job of being just rogue-ish enough to be a convincing con man, but just soft enough to fall in love with a glamorous woman.

Anyway, this isn't the only movie ever made that requires you you check your brain at the door. And if you can, there are worse ways to pass a couple of hours.

The Other Guys Aren't Stupid

[boblipton · 6/10 · 6 April 2024]

Con man John Hodiak meets confidence woman Lucille Ball and they fall in love. Or does she? Hodiak is heading to Sing Sing with cop Lloyd Nolan for stealing half a million dollars in bond. Five years sewing mail bags wil net him that half a million, so he's doing it willingly. Or is he? Miss Ball is definitely on his mind, as is Elisha Cook Jr., who wants half the money. Or does he? Might Miss Cook and Miss Ball want all the money?

This was a failure at the box office, and it's easy to see why. Everyone seems slightly miscast, save Nolan, who gives one of his usual dependable performances, and Vladimir Sokoloff. Yet I enjoy this movie immensely. It's the big Mardi Gras sequence at the end of the movie, and Karl Freund's camerawork. His portrait photography shows he can do MGM's high-lit shots as well as any, and he makes Miss Ball more beautiful than she had ever been, before or since. No wonder he became the chief cameraman for Miss Ball's TV show!

Ball and Hodiak star in Dassin's offbeat, noirish romance

[bmacv · 8/10 · 3 November 2002]

Anyone coming to Jules Dassin's Two Smart People in expectation of the hard-core noir of his Brute Force, The Naked City, Thieves' Highway or Night and the City will have a surprise in store. Here, Dassin betrays his continental roots in fabricating a light if poignant romance between two con-artists. And though the movie has a noir veneer, it's less suggestive of Fritz Lang or Robert Siodmak than of Ernst Lubitch – specifically the Lubitch of Trouble in Paradise, another elegant romance sparked between larcenous lovers.

The pairing here is between Lucille Ball, on the lam from a job she pulled in Hot Springs, Arkansas, and John Hodiak, being escorted back from the west coast to finish a stint at Sing Sing by cop Lloyd Nolan. While trying to sabotage one another's swindles, Ball and Hodiak fall in love, and she joins him on his train journey to that castle on the Hudson. Also in play are half a million in bonds which are tucked away in a fancy cookbook (all ortolans and truffles) that Hodiak, a bit of a gourmet, keeps with him for bedside reading. And the wild card is nasty Elisha Cook, Jr., one of Ball's former partners in crime, who wants the bonds for himself.

Dassin keeps a delicate balance between the intrigue and the romance, but the romance wins out (and who's complaining). Hodiak takes to the lighter, more debonair style with greater conviction than he does the harder-boiled roles he played in Somewhere in the Night and Desert Fury that same year. Ball, in a role that is neither too broad (like The Fuller Brush Girl or Miss Grant Takes Richmond) nor too melodramatic (like The Big Street), delivers a subtle and winning performance – and she looks smashing.

For his finale, Dassin whisks us to New Orleans during Mardi Gras, granting Cook a flamboyant exit. It's a gaudy set-piece crowded with costumed revelers that raises the spirits before they grow subdued at the surprisingly bittersweet ending. If Two Smart People can be counted as part of the noir cycle (and it often is), it's possibly its most effervescent title. If not, who cares? It remains an offbeat delight all its own.

This movie is NOT a comedy

[reve-2 · 5/10 · 26 August 2000]

For some reason the Maltin book looks for laughs in this film. It is not a comedy. I guess some folks were expecting comedy because of the presence of Lucille Ball. In actuality she plays a con woman who is on the lam from the law in Arkansas. She meets up with John Hodiak, a con man who has struck a deal with New York police authorities and who is being transported back to New York by Lloyd Nolan, a good cop who has become friendly with Hodiak. Nolan agrees to indulge in a fun filled train trip back to New York, which ultimately includes stops in places such as New Orleans (at Mardi Gras time). Hodiak tricks Nolan into entering Mexico, where he intends to remain, outside US jurisdiction. But, Nolan comes up with a neat way to get Hodiak back to the US. Naturally, Ms. Ball just happens to be on the same train and is with the two men at all stops along the way. There's an attempt at a love story between Hodiak and Ball which is pretty lame. Another big mistake was the casting of Elisha Cook Jr. as a former partner of Hodiak's who had been double crossed. He is supposed to be a menacing figure throughout the train trip and during the Mardi Gras scenes in New Orleans. But, there is no way that Cook, with his wimpy look, could ever appear to be a menace, even when he has a gun pointed at someone and tries to talk tough. Nolan, by far, does the best job in this movie. He is believable as a very nice cop who stays one step ahead of Hodiak's plots. As I said before, this movie is not a comedy. Unfortunately, it is also not a particularly good film.

Elegant Romance/Crime Drama

[HarlowMGM · 8/10 · 6 August 2009]

THREE SMART PEOPLE might be considered the low-point of Lucille Ball's career at MGM in the 1940's but it's still a quite good little tale and a rather unique cross between romance and crime drama. Lucy and John Hodiak are elegant con artists who find themselves battling for the same pigeon. There are romantic sparks immediately but a rival is a rival and they each deliberately ruin the other's con. When Lucy learns from old partner Elijah Cook Jr that Hodiak is carrying a hidden a half million in bonds, she ditches Cook and manages to find a spot on the cross-country train Hodiak is on heading toward New Orleans. Lucy is unaware though that Hodiak's traveling partner Lloyd Nolan is a cop escorting him on one last fun fling before Hodiak turns himself in for a prison stretch of at least five years.

This smooth pseudo-film noir is surprisingly agreeable. Essentially a three person picture (Ball, Hodiak, and Nolan) the only other part of any length is Cook's who surprisingly billed below both Hugo Haas and Lenore Ulric in roles that are basically bit parts. The movie looks great and it's no surprise Lucy later sought the cinematographer Karl Freund to helm I LOVE LUCY. She's a vision here, particularly in the Mardi Gras segment. The extended New Orleans sequence is the highlight of the film and director Jules Dassin and the production designers do a very fine job of capturing both the unique look of the city and Carnival season, complete with jazz for the background music. TWO SMART PEOPLE is a very enjoyable diversion with a nice performance by Lucy in an atypical role.

Romance and crime at the Mardi Gras

[bkoganbing · 5/10 · 9 September 2018]

A couple of people who make their living just over the line between citizen and criminal fall in love. An unlikely romance between Lucille Ball and John Hodiak when Hodiak queers an art con game she's running on mark Lloyd Corrigan.

Despite that bad beginning these two fall in love as Hodiak is being taken back from Mexico to the USA by cop Lloyd Nolan. Hodiak has safely stashed some bonds he stole that when they are cashed will net him a nice lifetime income so he's copping a plea to a lesser charge and then will be fleeing presumably to a non-extradition jurisdiction to enjoy life after his sentence is up.

The fly in this ointment is Elisha Cook, Jr. playing a more adult and tougher version of Wilmer the gunsill from The Maltese Falcon. He wants in or he wants all the proceeds and he doesn't care how he gets it.

Given the talent involved this should have been a better film. But I think too much time was devoted to Hodiak and Ball who really have no chemistry at all. That con game with Corrigan had some of the best moments in the movie and the climax shootout among the Mardi Gras revelers in costume was done well also.

But it sags in the middle like a swayback horse.

Love triumphs over smartness! As if you couldn't guess ...

[pronker · 8/10 · 20 August 2014]

I give this 8/10 because it was unexpectedly good, in particular in the romance department as Love overtakes two smart people. Watching it primarily for Ball, her expressive face gliding between smugness and dismay as Hodiak foils her neat fraudulent scheme with her first 'mark' to be seen, a greedy person with too much money and not enough sense. She is fun and later in the film, quite touching in her admission of the feelings of heretofore scorned emotion, love. Hodiak is also good, and the plot fairly simple: Hodiak is an 'honest' crook, willing to endure an assured short time in prison to be freed, later to enjoy his fraudulent bonds. I liked the Mardi Gras element and the fact that the train's milieu is pointed out in their little stumbles and cramped quarters. Lloyd Nolan, stolid cop, gets a taste of the high life but doesn't succumb to any more temptations, where in a darker film, he would have - also in a darker film, we would have shootings and stabbings and failed dreams and whatnot. I did not want to see a darker film so this one, which another reviewer has likened to a Lubitsch film, suited well.

Below par

[AAdaSC · 4/10 · 30 June 2010]

Bob Simms (Lloyd Nolan) accompanies fraudster Ace (John Hodiak) to prison via Mexico and New Orleans. They share their journey with Ricki (Lucille Ball), another fraudster who is up to tricks of her own. Ricki and Ace fall in love but fellow crook Fly (Elisha Cook Jnr) is tracking her and wants something from her. The film builds to it's climax at Mardi Gras..........everyone gets what they deserve....

This film is quite boring. Nothing really happens and the whole Mardi Gras sequence drags on and on and isn't at all interesting. It provides one good moment when Ricki steals the cook book behind Fly's back. The cast are OK but Elisha Cook Jnr is as awful as always - he is a very unconvincing tough guy. More like a pip-squeek. The love affair between Ace and Ricki is also a bit suspect. The film is watchable and ticks by but when it finishes, it leaves you with a feeling of absolutely nothing. The film is OK if a little dull. No need to see it again.

Don't expect laughs; that's not what it is

[eospaulding · 9/10 · 3 November 2021]

Some of the reviewers -- and the esteemed Leonard Maltin -- totally miss the point here. This was not, and was not intended to be, a funny flick. It's a caper, a light drama, a romance, a bit of a road movie . . . And the Lucille Ball-John Hodiak pairing is terrific. Ball, at 35, is stunning. The Mardi Gras crowd scenes are wonderfully choreographed. Lloyd Nolan provides just the right amount of tough guy with a twinkle in his eye. White-collar criminal that he is, Hodiak's Ace is fun, commendable, and has created a past that makes the many contacts on the road warm to him. Nothing brilliant here, just a fast-paced film with terse, effective, direction and three A1 performances. Well worth your 90 minutes.

2 smart people

[mossgrymk · 4/10 · 7 November 2021]

One dumb movie. Dassin would go on to do better romantic rogue pics ("Riffifi" "Topkapi") while, of course, Ball would just go on to do better. Hodiak, alas, was not as fortunate as his fellow HUAC-er Dassin and would pretty much fall by the anti communist wayside, the same road where Lucy's career flourished. And speaking of all things HUAC I wonder if there was lively conflict on the set of this dull film between lefties Hodiak/Dassin and future Reaganite Ms. Ball?

An unfairly labeled little gem with three smart stars.

[WarnersBrother · 8/10 · 22 November 2014]

Somewhere during the formation of the Film Noir cult somebody decided to include Two Smart People in the Genre and that has hobbled it's reputation ever since. Sure, it is Directed by Jules Dassin and had two of the great stars of Noir, the indispensable LLoyd Nolan and John Hodiak, who had teamed in the great Noir Somewhere In The Night just prior to this film. But none of that means it MUST be Noir and it isn't, nor was it intended to be.

What it is is a bit of a charming Romantic Fantasy inside of a Morality Play wrapped in a minor Crime Drama. In feel it very much reminds me of Remember The Night. Lots of smiles, no belly laughs. There is a small bit of violence, but other than that it's a fantasy.

Hodiak is great as a charming rogue with a heart of gold and penchants for fraud and gastronomics. He is perfect for the role and plays it with great amusement. Someone else had said that this is the nadir of Lucille Ball's days at MGM and I couldn't disagree more...if they had been giving her roles like this right along she would have been a major Star, something which would have to wait for television. Nolan steals the picture which is to be expected from one of the very best character actors Hollywood has ever been fortunate to have.

Lloyd Corrigan is in it but if you blink you miss him, Elisha Cook is the real bad guy and is terrible, which makes it so much better when he gets his. Solid supporting cast including Hugo Haas who has a nice turn and Vladimir Sokoloff playing yet another ethnic part...this time he's French! I liked it, glad I saw it and it's going to be on my favs list...I was lucky enough to recognize it for what it is early in and settled down to enjoy it. Wouldn't make a bad double bill come Christmas with Remember The Night. If you want Noir. look elsewhere.

the cop gets into the way

[SnoopyStyle · 4/10 · 31 October 2021]

Con man Ace Connors (John Hodiak) has hidden $500k in bonds in a cookbook. He encounters con woman Ricki Woodner (Lucille Ball) and blows up her scam. He has been caught for the bond theft and has do a deal to reduce his sentence. His partner Fly Feletti (Elisha Cook, Jr.) is not happy with his cut. Police detective Bob Simms (Lloyd Nolan) accompanies him to New York to close the deal. Ricki follows them onto the train.

This should have been a fun con vs con flick but the cop gets into the way. It should have been simple with plenty of double-crossing and triple-crossing. The first con has a fun ending. It's the start of something but it ends there. Instead of a fun romp, it tries to be a romantic melodrama. The villainous Fly could have added more tension but he's not showcased enough. Again, the cop sucks up the space that would have been better served with the Fly. In the end, nothing really works in this movie. Even the romantic chemistry suffers. There is a Mardi Gras section but that is only marginally interesting. Imagine Lucille Ball playing a fun con woman character in a fun cat-and-mouse con game. This is not that.