Add a Review

  • The Battle of the Sexes is directed by Charles Crichton (The Lavender Hill Mob/ The Titfield Thunderbolt) and it stars Peter Sellers, Robert Morley & Constance Cummings. It's based on the short story The Catbird Seat written by James Thurber, with the script written by Monja Danischewsky.

    The grand House of MacPherson in Scotland has been supplying genuine Scottish tweeds for many years. Tho Woven out in the sticks by the professionals, the tweeds are sold out of the Macpherson HQ in Edinburgh. When Old MacPherson (Ernest Thesiger) dies, his son, Young MacPherson (Morley), takes over but is hardly blessed with business acumen. Things start to get dicey when he brings in Angela Barrows (Cummings) as an efficiency expert, an American lady he met on the train. The ageing staff, led by Mr. Martin (Sellers), is horrified as she starts updating the methods of running a business. To their minds a woman is for making the tea and cleaning up, not for doing away with hundreds of years of tradition with new fangled contraptions and ideas. However, Mr. Martin hatches a plan to rid the company of this meddlesome modern tyrant.

    Something of an unknown British comedy featuring the great Peter Sellers, The Battle of The Sexes sees him teamed with Crichton to deliver a smart and very funny piece. The film is dealing in cultural clashes and the battle is not just of the sexes, but also a poignant conflict between the advent of time and its impact on business'. Arcane traditionalists versus the forward thinking modern capitalist: or if you like? British custom versus American progress. Both played superbly by Sellers; as the calm and unhurried Mr. Martin; and Cummings as the get up and at em quickly Angela Barrows. Danischewsky's script is very impressive given that the source was very slight, and Crichton has done wonders to not let the film descend into slapstick or out of place screwball. Much like Mr. Martin, the comedy is very sedate, unhurried or forced. There's some farce in there, with one chase sequence in Angela's apartment wonderfully constructed, but the film never gets out of control and it's all the better for it. As the two rivals try to outwit each other, this brings Morley's (great as usual) oblivious Young Mac into play. The result is a three pronged character piece deserving of a bigger audience. 8/10
  • ...as the quiet, devoted worker at the House of McPherson, a Scottish firm that's made tweed the same way forever. All that may change when the owner dies, and his son Robert Morley, returns from the US to run things, bringing with him Constance Cummings, an accomplished consultant. Morley is enamored of Cummings, and relishes all the changes she suggests (radical things like a real filing system, or opening the windows..) but when she suggests that the hand woven fabric can be factory-made more efficiently, mild mannered Sellers tries to sabotage her work, and then realizes the only solution is to be rid of her - permanently.

    His murder attempt is perfectly timed comedy, and Sellers at his best. Expect sexism throughout this, based on a James Thurber story and it was 1960 after alll. Films of the 50's and early 60's often strike me as cringe-worthy when it comes to portrayal of women during that bridge period in film history when women are still not liberated but are now treated as overt sex objects. Overall, this is all about Sellers, but Cummings and Morley are in top form as well. There are clever well written characters with a slight eye-roll ending, but still recommended.
  • neil-47628 February 2016
    Warning: Spoilers
    When Robert Macpherson inherits the family business (making traditional tweeds) he brings in American efficiency expert Angela Barrows, who proceeds to introduce changes which are almost all for the worst. Meek, gentle manager Mr Martin, trying to keep her at bay (despite the fact that she has Macpherson under her thumb) comes to the conclusion that the only solution is to murder her.

    This 1960 black and white British comedy, based on a James Thurber story, stars the then 35-year old Peter Sellers as the late-50s Martin, sporting a gentle Edinburghian accent (the film is set in Edinburgh), Robert Morley as the rather histrionic Mcpherson, and Constance Cummings as the not as clever as she thinks she is Barrows. The film is not hilarious, but it is constantly amusing. And Sellers - gloriously underplaying in a movie where everyone else is over the top - is brilliant. But then, he always was.
  • Peter Sellers could do just about anything and this film helped to prove that fact. With some white hair, a moustache, and spectacles, you thoroughly believe his transformation into Mr. Martin, a character at least twenty-five years older than the actor was at the time.

    Although the title sounds like a sex romp, that's not the right description of this clever comedy with a somewhat dark theme. But BATTLE OF THE SEXES is about a power struggle between a man and woman. Martin is the faithful manager at the House of MacPherson, a Scottish firm that's been turning out tweed the same way for decades. When the new heir (Robert Morley) takes over, he brings in a domineering efficiency expert (Constance Cummings), an American no less, whose ideas threaten to ruin the company.

    Martin is forced to act. While he seems like a quiet and unassuming sort, he actually has a lot of guile and cunning beneath his mild-mannered exterior. First he tries to get her fired, but when that doesn't work he decides that more drastic measures are called for - like murder. Martin comes up with what he believes is the perfect plan, and all he has to do is carry it out.

    Do yourself a favor and watch it all unfold. Entertaining from start to finish, hilarious in several places, with a good supporting cast, and a plot that has a couple of surprises in store. Sellers proves yet again that he's a true comic genius. Three cheers for that, and four stars out of five for the film.
  • British comedy where mild-mannered character played by Sellers is moved to murder when the company he's given his life to is taken over by brash American woman. Due to make-up, Sellers looks the same age as when he played all those Pink Panther movies in the 70's. Cute ending, too.
  • Sellers as a quiet Edinburgh accountant with murder on his mind when faced with radical change in his life. Plus great old Edinburgh shots. It's sometimes beautifully shot by Freddie Francis, but it's also a sad reminder of how much better Peter Sellers was than most of the films he appeared in. Great comedy pedigree in a cast including Robert Morley with Charles Crichton directing, but , while it's perfectly solid, it just lacks a little bit of something. BTW My top 3 Sellers movies are: Dr Strangelove Being There The Party (underrated slapstick but Sellers is as funny as peak Chaplin) Loved others like I'm Alright Jack, the present Battle of the Sexes , The Mouse that Roared and of course the Clouseau classics.
  • gorytus-2067226 December 2021
    December 2021

    This film starring Peter Sellers and Robert Morley is a British comedy from 1960.

    Not one i have seen very often and in truth it does leave me a little disappointed.

    Mild comedy only, certainly didn't have me raising anything more than a modest chuckle at best.

    So disappointing given the talent on display, but ok, just not great.

    6 out of 10.
  • Contrary to what IMDb shows at the upper-right corner of its page for this movie, there IS a DVD of this film available, in the UK. I recently purchased it from Amazon, there, for 6 pounds. With high hopes, I inserted it into my DVD player and found that the quality of the film-to- digital transfer is nothing short of abysmal. Most of the film's scenes appear almost entirely black on the TV screen, with only a few details, like well-lit faces, shining through. This is a sorry re-release of this movie, which I had read such good things about here and there. From all I can tell, it is a delightful movie, full of wit and good acting and clever dialog.

    The story centers on a female business consultant from the US trying to whip an old-line tweed making company in Scotland into shape - another post-war British film concerned with the onslaught of American values and speedy lifestyle. (Another example that comes to mind is Ealing Studio's The Maggie, which is happily out on DVD in an optically splendid rendition.) The star, here, is a somewhat mousy Peter Sellers who is, of course, worth watching in almost any movie - especially when you can actually see him! Robert Morley, too, is worth the price of admission - one of my favorite British actors.
  • A delicious mix of dry comments, cultural clashes and devious expressions. Sellers is excellent as the mouse-like Mr Martin shocked to the core by the brash Miss Barrows and driven by his devotion to the family to protect tradition at all costs ! The bumbling uncertainty of the head of the Tweed empire could only be achieved by Morley whose portly figure towers over his frail employees as they await his next disastrous decision. Great examples of new not always being better (or not allowed to be !) form the key of the battle until the final hilarious showdown between the American and Scottish way of thinking. Every second is a film treat - should be on everyone's shelves !
  • I resisted watching this for sometime.. it sounds like a silly sex- com .. and the premise that the female lead is 'wrong' because she is a woman. Yes, some of the set up - that women have no role as leaders is well dodgy by today's standards - (and to be honest even for it's own time)

    But ignore that.. pretend that the out of touch moderniser is not wrong by virtue of being female.. See her as 'just happens to be' female, and her opponent as 'just happens to be' male.. and there is great fun to be had in this clash of ideals.

    Compare it to (but admittedly not quite as good as) I'm all right Jack.. where you have differing views of how a work place should be run.

    Call it ageist .. She is young, he is old.. call it maybe anti American (she is a brash American, he a quiet modest Scott) .. or just see it as differing mind sets battling it out.

    If you want to try and be clever (and read too much into it) see it as a precursor to Crichton's much later 'Fish called Wanda'.. With Sellers as the John Cleese type v the Constance Cummings character as Wanda...
  • This is such a finely photographed and acted piece and such a shame that it seems so whimsical and unfunny. I am reminded of a recent viewing of The Wrong Box in which Peter Sellers has the most fantastic and hilariously funny cameo as an old man with ledgers in a room full of cats and then to see him working just as hard here to be an old stuck in the mud without anything like the same result. There was a massive cultural change that sets the 50s and 60s far apart and this film released in 1960 seems very much steeped in the world of the previous decade, if not the late 40s whereas by the time of the later Bryan Forbes film there had been enormous upheaval and even more hinted at. So, for some this might be considered a charming and subtle film with no bad language or crude guffaws but most will find it at best a time capsule of less imaginative times.
  • A gentle, funny tale by a master storyteller, turned into a delightfully droll film with the supremely gifted Peter Sellers in yet another magnificent performance. Based on "The Catbird's Seat" by one of my favorite authors, James Thurber, the film is typical English understated comedy, which makes me laugh heartily. There is no meanness in this film, no put-downs of either gender. It's just a story of an encounter between Old World England and New World America circa 1950s. Dated? Yes, but terrifically funny nonetheless. My only complaint: It's not available for purchase anywhere that I've been able to discover. If it were, I'd buy it in a New York minute.
  • This is not the best film of Peter Sellers! But it is not bad either. Demonstrates here also what subtle actor he was. All the "blame" is on the script which is not great, fuzzy, like those in the Pink Panther series, here we have a simple Scottish story, a little melancholy comedy. The old fox Sellers faces the American Constance Cummings and defeats her in the battle to stay in the 19th century. But, just watch it, is a little dusty but still fun in the scene when visiting her.
  • Like a rancid old sock, the old male customs stink. The film culminates not with a tally but with a cynical bouquet of forget-me-nots that the character assassin gives to the protagonist. She should just not recover from your trauma and probably be finally trampled. One of the worst roles of Peter Sellers. The only justification of this piece is that of a historical evidence for the contempt of women in the 60s.
  • This one is a lot of fun, wryly funny, not over-produced and, of course, impeccably cast. Sellers was often sabotaged once Hollywood purloined him but here he's in fine form and gives one of his cleverest performances. Robert Morley lends just the right level of support and Constance Cummings makes a formidable opponent to Sellers's mild-mannered Scot. She's extremely funny without being allowed to go too "over the top." Looks like this one is not available on video so catching it on TV will reward those who keep a sharp eye on the broadcast listings.
  • "The Battle of the Sexes" wasn't an Ealing comedy but it may as well have been. It's certainly in the Ealing class and is one of the best British comedies of its period. Of course, it had a great pedigree in James Thurber's short story 'The Catbird Seat' and it had an excellent cast headed by Peter Sellers, Robert Morley and Constance Cummings.

    Morley is the new owner of an antiquated Scottish tweed-making business, (his father, the great Ernest Thesiger, died with a dram in his hand), Cummings the officious American efficiency expert intent on modernising it and Sellers, the old accountant who will resort to anything, including murder, to stop her. It's a black farce and a very funny one and it represents something of a high point in the career of director Charles Crichton although, surprisingly, it isn't particularly well-known outside the UK.
  • When this story inspired by a Thurber story begins, the elderly owner of a Tweed manufacturing company in Edinburgh is on death's door. And, after he passes, his foolish son, Robert Macpherson (Robert Morley) takes over the practically destroys the company. This is because he's met an obnoxious know-it-all woman (Constance Cummings) and she is intent on shaking things up at the company...even though things seem to be working just fine. But Robert is blind to how destructive and costly the changes are....as well as he plans to fire most of the employees and mechanize. But his trusted employee, Mr. Martin (Peter Sellers), clearly sees the damage this woman is doing....and he plans to take care of her himself...for the good of the company.

    I had a laugh watching this film, as I can see what many Brits see when they see Americans playing Brits....clumsy accents and overdoing it a bit when it came to British actors pretending to be Americans (in particular, Ms. Cummings and Donald Pleasence). This doesn't really harm the film...but it is funny seeing how Americans are portrayed. I am not sure if some 21st century viewers will laugh at Cummings' character, however, as she could be interpreted (possibly) as an anti-feminist character....a lady who wants to take over the male-dominated industry. I didn't take it this way...more that this particular woman was obnoxious and awful!

    Overall, this is a cute little comedy and one of Peter Sellers' most forgotten roles. He's lovely as the 60-something employee and plays him with great subtlety (he is no Dr. Strangelove!). Cute and enjoyable...and well worth seeing.
  • Author and humorist James Thurber was alive when this film was made. One can imagine that he saw "The Battle of the Sexes" and approved its rendition of his 1942 short story, "The Catbird Seat." Not only do the two main protagonists of the film resemble those of his story - they even have the same names - Mr. Martin and Mrs. Barrows. And, Peter Sellers and Constance Cummings bring to life these two characters who first brought laughter to readers of The New Yorker magazine in November 1942.

    The setting is different, and the makers of this British comedy expanded and built on Thurber's story. By setting it in Scotland, it added laughs with gender and culture differences. And, the focal base for the battle couldn't be better - a traditional Scottish tweed firm.

    The humor here is in dialog and situations. After an opening scene in the board room of a London corporation, the credits run and the tone is set by a narrator introducing the film: "Mr. James Thurber, America's great chronicler of man's losing battle, has warned us all. We are living at a time when in a moth-proof closet dwells... the moth." No one can miss the inference here - the tweeds are wool, and nothing is more destructive of wool than moths.

    As scenes appear on the screen of Scots in kilts marching, playing the bagpipes, dancing and walking, the narrator continues. "So, destiny sent Mrs. Barrows to carry the sex war into one of the last bastions of man's supremacy - Scotland. A man's world. A world in which the shortest skirts are worn by man. A world in which even the can-can is danced by man. This was to be the battleground." The last scene is hilarious - a tall Scot wearing a kilt above the knees and beside him walks a much shorter woman with a skirt below mid-calf.

    All of the cast are excellent. Sharing the lead with the protagonists is Robert Morley as Robert Macpherson. It's "himself" who has taken over the reins of the Macpherson Company after his father dies. But, Robert was off in America and couldn't even make his father's funeral. On his way from London, he meets Angela Barrows on the train, who was being sent to Scotland by those men in the opening corporate scene - to get her out of their hair. But Robert encourages her to come to work for him.

    Morley is in a sort of referee role - between the protagonists. But he is pretty clueless about everything, making it all the more hilarious. Mrs. Barrows plans to modernize, upgrade, expand, and in essence redo the staid, top quality tweed company into a mass producer of modern cloth - synthetics.

    As the narrator says, closing out the opening scenes, "Mr. Martin may not be cast in the heroic mold, but he is a hero just the same." And, that's because of one thing - he's in the catbird seat. As Mrs. Barrows explains, it is a baseball term that means he holds an advantageous position. Macpherson introduces him as the man who knows the whole operation and controls the purse strings.

    Angela Barrows is the double "villain" in this film - as the woman charging forward into the business world of men, and as the modern, progressive "time and motion" efficiency expert. She is the picture of power, bigger is better, greed and get ahead at all costs. She's the corporate guru who is the management expert with no common sense. She doesn't need to learn the ropes of the trade. She wants to retire the 700 weavers who work from their homes spread across the Hebrides off the shores of mainland Scotland. In their place will be a centralized factory with new people who don't need to learn to weave wool because the company will go into more modern fabrics - synthetics.

    But the irony works both ways, because when she enters Mr. Martin 's shop of pen and ink clerks, it's apparent that the Macpherson Company probably missed the last two generations of business practice improvements. There is no filing system at all. If Mr. Martin goes, so goes the knowledge of where anything is.

    As Mrs. Barrows convinces Macpherson to modernize, the company gets an intercom system, noisy adding machines, and filing cabinets, But, with the plans for a new factory and product changes, Mr. Martin has had enough. Having promised the late Sir Macpherson that he would guide the gullible and green young Robert in the business, he must now find a way to stop Mrs. Barrows. And that's when the very funny antics commence.

    One of the funniest scenes of its kind is when Martin tries to knock off Mrs. Barrows. He gets the idea from a movie he attends, and then tries to emulate the plot of the film. It turns around into a hilarious fiasco that will have Macpherson thinking Mrs. Barrows has lost her marbles.

    A few favorite lines give a hint of what to expect in this film.

    Robert Macpherson, "Nobody understands the workings of the departments better than Martin here. He holds all the purse strings." Angela Barrows, "Oh, I see. Well, you ARE in the catbird seat. Baseball term - means, sitting pretty."

    Angela Barrows, "Oh, ho, ho, come now, Rip Van Winkle. Don't tell me you've never heard of mechanization."

    Angela Barrows, "Oh, for heaven's sake, ask Mr. White. Mr. White saw him." Robert Macpherson, "Who's Mr. White?" Barrows, "The blind man." Macpherson, "What?' Barrows, "I mean, he would've seen him. His dog sniffed his trousers." Mr. Martin, " I have no dog, sir." Barrows, "I mean, Mr. White's dog. Don't listen to him, Robert." Macpherson, "You mean Martin was seen by a blind dog?"
  • This well-cast adaptation of a classic James Thurber story relocates the action to Edinburgh and offers Peter Sellers one of his best roles as a timid bureaucrat who turns into a man of action when the crusty family firm he works for is threatened by an "efficiency expert" (and a female one at that!). His bumbling attempts to resolve the situation at the climax are a delight whilst co-star Robert Morley is perfect in the sort of role that he was born to play.

    There's some fine location work, beautifully shot in black-and-white by Oscar-winning cinematographer Freddie Francis and a late screen appearance by "Doctor Praetorius" himself, the sepulchral Ernest Thesiger.
  • Mr. Martin is a clerk at a Scottish Tweed weaving company.Then one day a creature called woman starts talking about all these changes they should make in the company.He has a little problem with that.The Battle of the Sexes (1959) is directed by Charles Crichton.It's based on the short story The Catbird Seat by the great humorist James Thurber from 1942.Peter Sellers is quite excellent as Mr. Martin.He obviously wasn't an old man when he did this film, but he certainly seems that way.He's nailed the gestures and all perfectly.Robert Morley is terrific as Robert Macpherson.Constance Cummings does brilliant work as Angela Barrows.Donald Pleasence is great as Irwin Hoffman.This is a pretty funny comedy, although it's not the best Peter Sellers starred in.The funniest sequence must be when he goes out to kill the lady.For Peter Sellers fans this is one not to be missed.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Just like the criticism from feminists that Laurel & Hardy rarely paint a realistic picture of a wife, girlfriend, or woman in their films (Mae Busch is certainly one tough customer against them), the writer - cartoonist James Thurber was also accused of misogyny. His female characters are eccentric, blasé about the worst tragedies that befall male characters (a woman confronts a hippopotamus in the jungle, and we see the remains of a man's clothing and property on the ground - "Just what did you do with Dr. Millmoss?" she asks waving her finger in the hippo's face, like she is a kindergarten teacher), and frequently fully ready to do battle to the death for domination of their male counterparts. So women do have a point, but Thurber is equally critical about the men who inhabit his planet too. All too frequently they are cowardly - witness his greatest fictional character, "Walter Mitty", who retreats into fantasy to survive a dreadful life.

    Thurber did a series of cartoons entitled "The War Between Men and Women" that traces a genuine war between the sexes. It does end with a male victory (femenists please note). But he also wrote this short story, "THE CAT BIRD'S SEAT" which is like an expanded version of an earlier tale called "THE UNICORN IN THE GARDEN". In both, a Walter Mitty type man is confronted by a dominating wife or woman, and manages to turn the table on her by "proving" to the people who matter that the woman is crazy.

    "THE UNICORN IN THE GARDEN" was actually a Thurber fable, and it has been made into several films or television episodes (one was on MY WORLD AND WELCOME TO IT). THE CAT BIRD'S SEAT is a little different. It turned out to be made into a film only once - in 1959, and in Great Britain - not the United States. It's stars are Peter Sellers, as a meek Scotsman working in a century old textile firm in Edinburgh. It's current owner is Robert Morley, who has more money than sense. Morley has spent most of his time in London, so he has forgotten that the great capital of the North is a slower, more traditional place than the hated southern capital. Morley has met Constance Cummings, an energetic American businesswoman, who has depressed the morale of the American firm she has been working for. In fact, when the film begins, Cummings is told (rather cruelly by a drunken Donald Pleasance) that he was told to accompany her to London not for business conferences, but to unceremoniously dump her as she was boarding a train. Her male counterparts (including Pleasance) are entirely upset at her showing them up by her superior abilities and energy. Hence the way they drop her.

    Morley is too fatuous to understand what a danger this woman will be to his staff. He is just impressed at her stroking his ego, and her big ideas about expanding business by modernizing equipment and processes that have stood the test of time. Sellers, the business manager when Morley is usually away, watches with horror as a complicated inter office intercom system is put in for the staff to use to contact each other (rather than just walking over to each other's desk). The wisdom of this development is shown to Morley when one of his employees (while trying to get a cup of tea) pushes the wrong button and says something insulting about Morley in his hearing.

    Other innovations are coming, and Morley is certainly under Cummings' thumb. Sellers comes up with the idea of killing the American, and goes to her apartment. But at the last moment he just can't bring himself to do it. Instead, Cummings unwittingly gives him a better idea. Who'd believe he would ever visit her at night at her apartment? Taking advantage of this, he starts telling her his wild "plan" to get rid of Morley and take over the firm with Cummings as his partner lover. He convinces her that he means business, and she tries to warn Morley, who has shown up for dinner. But Sellers, Morley, and Cummings (in a well choreographed sequence) keep missing each other in the apartment, so that the next day Sellers can deny he ever was there. Which may lead to Cummings leaving the firm. Or will it?

    As a follow - up to THE SECRET LIFE OF WALTER MITTY and THE MALE ANIMAL, THE BATTLE OF THE SEXES is worthy to be watched with them. Despite the expansion of the story to give it the Scottish atmosphere, and Morley's fatuous boss, everything works. And as with WALTER MITTY, after you've seen this read THE CAT BIRD'S SEAT to see what was the original tale like.
  • In order to get her out of their hair, her US employers send powerful businesswoman out to Scotland on some vague mission to investigate export potential. On the way she meets businessman Robert MacPherson who asks for her help to improve the efficiency of his late father's company. The mere suggestion that a woman would be brought into the male dominated company causes panic within the stuffy departments of the company – especially since the sole woman employee only makes tea for the men. Things only get worse when she starts updating the company, suggesting centralised tweed production in a factory, changing filing systems and carrying out time & motion studies. Happily employee Mr Martin is on hand to try and outwit her modernising ways.

    In this comedy the plot could easily just involve a man coming into a company because the battle is less one of male versus female and more a matter of old school versus new school where, much I'm Alright Jack, Sellers leads the defence against such action. Looking at it this way the film is much more interesting because it keeps it relevant (nobody likes change) whereas the idea of working for a female boss is no longer the crazy modern idea that it may have once been. The film uses this story reasonably well and produced a few chuckles from me while managing to maintain a consistent amusing tone. The lack of really sharp jokes or big laughs is a bit of a problem though, and it would have been better if the commentary had been sharper and some of the comic sequences had had more laughs but the overall tone is quite nice.

    The main reason it is quite funny is the subtle playing of Sellers who is gently amusing and sets the tone well for the material; perhaps not one of his most famous creations but he is enjoyable nonetheless. He is well supported by Morley, who plays the blundering boss with enthusiasm and adds to the comedy. Cummings is quite good and brings out well the manipulative nature of some women – turning on femininity and tears when it suits them; she does this well without being cruel to her sex I thought. The support is mainly good and includes a brief appearance from Donald Pleasence but really the film belongs to Sellers in his quiet role along with Morley and Cummings.

    Overall this is not a great film mainly because it lacks a sharp intelligent edge that it could have had and not replacing that with enough broad laughs to do the job. The cast really help and the material is good enough to be roundly amusing and it is worth a look because it is a pleasing little film even if it isn't anything that special or memorable.
  • This film represents classic British humor with wonderful actors. The story is quite modern despite the period setting. I wish the film were available on video. If you enjoy listening to a Scottish accent you will especially enjoy this movie.
  • I read Thurber's short story, "The Catbird Seat" as a part of my English course in school, and thoroughly enjoyed it then. Seeing the film version (years later) was a real treat. Peter Sellers was very good as the shy and sneaky Mr. Martin, but Constance Cummings reduced Miss Barrows to a caricature. Her breakdown at the end of the film comes across as contrived - she makes it look as if Miss Barrows is pretending to cry to get sympathy. Other than that, it is a thoroughly enjoyable film to watch.
  • While the plot and characters are as described above, two things puzzle me. The film's title, for one - at no point is this a battle of the sexes, the fact that protagonist and antagonist are of differing gender matters little until Mr. Martin's clumsy attempts at murder are mistaken for seduction by his intended victim.

    And then there's the coda of the piece, where a voice-over suggests that maybe Mr. Martin has won the battle, but may lose the war, as Mrs. Barrows' tears stir something within him. The entire sequence feels tacked-on, and the American accent of the v/o artist (Sam Wanamaker) suggests the film, extolling as it does traditional values over modern ways, perhaps wouldn't play well in the progress-obsessed 1950's America, and was hastily re-branded as a quirky sex comedy. Incorrect though such an assumption may be, it does leave one wondering. . .
An error has occured. Please try again.