Add a Review

  • COOL IT CAROL! is a low budget sexploitation epic from British director Pete Walker, although even at this stage of his career he can't resist making the material as dark and uncomfortable as it can be. Made in 1970, it proves a fitting tribute of its era, complete with sleazy porn producers, dirty old men, and all manner of outlandish fashions and hairstyles.

    The production values are typically excellent as this looks and feels like your usual above-average Walker production. Robin Askwith and Janet Lynn are a good fit as the out-of-their-depth young couple who move to London with hopes of hitting the big time, only to find themselves drawn into a world of sleaze. The grubby atmosphere is spot on and there's plenty of tasty nudity for male viewers to enjoy (particularly from the delectable Lynn), but it's all rather seedy and depressing.

    In many ways this film is an offshoot of the old 'sensation' genre of the 1930s, about pretty young girls finding themselves exploited by perverted older men. There are indications at comedy with the presence of Askwith and some funny dialogue, but as mentioned, it's rather depressing overall with a storyline that never really goes anywhere. I much prefer Walker when he has a story to tell, as in his later film HOME BEFORE MIDNIGHT.
  • Somewhat interesting cautionary tale(or tail if you prefer) about a young couple leaving the barrenness of their humdrum lives behind in a small English village and going to the big city - a really swinging London in the late 1960s. What they find is that work is hard to come by unless you are really willing to shed your inhibitions and your clothes. While the story probably resonates much of the real-life atmosphere of the culture of that time, the film bogs down really into one sexual scene after another - none of them particularly effective or redeeming in any way. And though the film is considered a black comedy - I think of it really more as a bleak one. I found so little humor in the film. Director Pete Walker - who would go on to do some pretty expressive and decent films of the horror/exploitation genres in the 70s - has obvious skill with the camera. The pace, sets, and dialog are all generally well-conceived for a film of this kind. The two primary acting leads are actually pretty good too as is most of the supporting cast. Watch for Stubby Kaye in a small role! But the end comes on so hard-handed and without warning as to be any bit believable though the film does try to have some moral to this constant parade of sexual encounters surrounding a youngish Carol and her openness to sleep with virtually anyone for a few bob.
  • Carol is quite something when you see her in lingerie or nude. She leaves her boring existence to pursue her modelling career, taking off with childhood friend, Robin Askwith, mostly still filling the boots of his Timmy Lea character in the Confession films. Though the story is supposedly true in this film, one wouldn't really care. A lot of people will do anything to survive. Askwith and co need money in London. Food, like that delectable pastry in the window and accommodation costs money. Someone talent spots Askwith's better half, and soon she's doing some pretty weird photographic nude shoots, and offering sexual services, where may'be a bit of her likes it. She becomes hooked, finding it hard to turn offers down, where Askwith starts getting annoyed. Jealousy? He has a thing for her? She doesn't decline at first. Some tasty nudity, provide momentary erotic entertainment from our title lead, doing it with some 60+ men, some moments of it getting nasty, if demeaning to our lead, despite it being a comedy, that didn't have me laughing. This movie isn't anything special. Bits of it are truly pathetic, and I wonder if the words, "acting lessons", mean anything to Askwith.
  • Part black comedy, part cautionary tale, "Cool it Carol!" is the frank story of a sometime-couple of teens from the Midlands who hope to make the big move to London, circa 1969. She to be a model, he to be a delivery driver for an auto company. Carol is played by the fresh and quite pretty Janet Lynn, who unfortunately did almost no other films. The boy, played by Robin Askwith, brings a modestly charming goofiness. The rest of the cast is made up mostly of unknowns who do a pretty good job, and the sets and costuming are quite characterful. The music is unfortunately bland and heavy-handed. The plot is fairly standard potboiler stuff, relieved somewhat by the rather blase' attitude of the teens. Supposedly it is based upon a true story, as reported by that paragon of reportage -- The News of the World(!) Considering how often such situations must've occurred, it is not too wild a claim.

    In all, a good addition to the catalog of youth films set in London in the late 1960s, and made more watchable by the appeal of "Carol" herself. Where is she now?
  • BandSAboutMovies31 March 2021
    Warning: Spoilers
    According to the opening credits, "this story is true but actual names and places are fictitious." That's because Pete Walker read a story in the tabloid News of the World and got inspired. And unlike movies of this era like Permissive and More, the degenerate lifestyle he envisioned wasn't tragic.

    Joe (Robin Askwith, the Confessions of... series) and Carol (Janet Lynn*, Twins of Evil) have left behind their small town for swinging London, where Joe fails to even find the simplest of jobs and she quickly becomes a model.

    Before you can open the newspaper to Page 3, Carol's involved in the scummier side of entertainment - the photoshoot for a dirty magazine was shot in Mayfair photographer Philip O. Stearn's studio and the stills were in the July 1970 issue - with dirty old men all wanting a piece of our heroine.

    There's some great casting here, with Stubby Kaye (the owner of Acme in Who Framed Roger Rabbit?), Harry Baird (The Four of the Apocalypse), Chris Sandford (who was also in Walker's Die Screaming, Marianne), radio DJ Pete Murray, Carry On star Eric Barker, Pearl Hackney (who was in four Walker films, including Four Dimensions of Greta, Tiffany Jones and Schizo) and Martin Wyldeck (Walker really liked using the same actors, as he also was in several of his movies).

    This never gets as dirty as the American title - The Dirtiest Girl I Ever Met - promises. It exists in a different time of sexuality, where Robin Askwith's butt and innuendo is enough. But man, all those scenes of old men licking their lips in slow motion makes me realize that Walker really was made to be a horror director.

    *Susan George was originally considered for this movie.
  • jaibo22 January 2009
    Warning: Spoilers
    Joe and Carol are two barely legal adults who decide to leave their home in the sticks and head for the capitol, where like every clichéd kid before them, they think the streets will be paved with gold. Carol especially has reason to believe that she will do well, as she recently won first prize in a beauty pageant. Once they hit town, they soon find themselves broke and without much chance of a proper career. So wouldn't you know it , Joe puts Carol on the game, and she's a hit. Pretty soon they're rolling in money. Made as little more than a lurid sexploitation film, Cool it Carol deals with the seamy underside of swinging sixties London, and is probably a bit more honest about what life was actually like than Darling or Smashing Time; it's every bit as fetid as Poor Cow or Performance, but doesn't dress itself in their realist airs or arty graces. Cool it Carol simply soaks its audience in the new possibilities that the sexual revolution, an new era which allowed young and old alike to indulge in promiscuous sex for kicks and cash, and allowed filmmakers to exploit the unwashed masses' prurient interest in such things for a good deal of financial gain. Never mind free love, Cool it Carol tells us that what the 60s really stood for was cash for loveless copulation. Perhaps Cool it Carol is the most honest film of its time.

    The heroine is prophetically named Carol Thatcher, and like the later admirers her real life namesake's mother she find her social success amongst people who believe that, as one character cynically observes, money can buy them anything. In some ways, Cool it Carol is an anti-morality tale – it shows that if you are young, talentless and attractive, you can get the high life by whoring yourself to the rich and powerful. Sadly, the film doesn't go the whole distance and show Joe and Carol enjoying their ill-gotten wealth and celebrity (as people do on our TV screens every day nowadays…) but realise it hasn't bought them happiness and so they go back home to the sticks. The film would have hit harder if Carol had accepted her role as a high class whore like Bernard Shaw's Mrs Warren. Perhaps the still vigilant British censor, and the hypocritical audiences, would have rejected the film (a considerable hit at the time) if it had done so… Yet despite the tacked on Puritanism of the ending, for the most part Cool it Carol wallows in its own degradation to an admirable degree. On leaving smallville for the first time, Carol and Joe bonk on the train, Joe surprised that Carol gets turned on showing herself off. Carol's sexuality is fairly complex and highly politically incorrect - she enjoys sex freely, likes exhibitionism and gets off on the idea of being sold to strangers, although when she's used by manky old man after skanky old cur, she finds the reality a bit less appealing than the fantasy. Cool it Carol shows the world of fashion models, low tarts, high class hookers and hardcore film shoots to be all piled on top of each other, and the best sequence of the film shows a group of salacious old men drooling as Joe and Carol get it on for their 8mm lens. Their attitude as dirty old leering dogs in this section mirrors no doubt the viewership experience of many of Cool it Carol's original audience, and there's a thrilling moment when an old suit throws off his clothes and tries to join in with the youngster's performance of sex for the camera. A cry goes up – "oh, you've spoilt it now" – and the dream of uninhibited sex for all comes crashing down. Earlier, at the film's outset, we were show a butcher cleaving meat; he then cuts his own finger off, and human beings are ready for the grinder. For it's visionary moments like this, Cool it Carol is truly a British cinema classic to be cherished.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Screened far too many times by Renown ('Talking Pictures TV'). Now if not then, the film is irresponsible, unfunny and unpleasant. The 1969/70 street scenes and vehicles are of historical interest (if only one knew how to upload images to imcdb.com). This movie's general bad taste and one or two goofs have been sharply observed by discerning reviewers.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Our characters head to London to make some cash, Asquith's character becomes a superpimp, then they get prudish towards the end. Not funny as a comedy, not interesting as a story, just titillation in the grubbiest way. We see semi-nudity regularly, and "Carol" is naive and frankly a bit unrealistic about being pimped out to all and sundry and shooting mucky movies, but as the story is so shallow it's the only way it functions at all.

    TBH "Last Night in Soho" (Edgar Wright) does it better, goes deeper, is more interesting, is darker, funnier, and portrays the scene more realistically despite being newer.
  • An absolute gem! This is possibly Walker's finest film, although it is a bit unfair to compare it to his 'terror' pictures. England, particularly, London 1970 and things are changing and this little film captures something of the very essence. Janet Lynn is fantastic as the wide eyed innocent who is more than happy to shed her clothes and have some fun. 'I don't mind people looking at my body. I quite like it actually.' This she says as she changes her dress and gets rid of her bra, in a railway compartment. Robin Askwith is also very good as the young guy who pretends to have all the connections but in reality is nowhere near as resourceful as the delightful Lynn. There are sleazy sessions with elderly men in high positions ready to take her on for a fiver when the young couple find their finances dwindle. Plenty of location shooting, some marvellous cinematography, humour and flesh and an insightful glimpse of London's underbelly c1970.
  • Pete Walker is famous primarily for the superlative horror films he made during the 70's like "Frightmare" and "House of the Whipcord" and secondarily for the sex comedies he churned out in the late 60's like "I Like Birds" and "School for Sex". This film, made during the transition between the two periods, doesn't really fit either category. It is more of a serious, realistic drama with occasional comic elements. It tells the story of two naive but extremely amoral young people who leave their boring small town lives for swinging London. After many humiliating experiences--having to resort to pimping, prostitution, and performing in stag films--against all odds (and all plausibility), they achieve their dream of a success, but it proves to be less than what they hoped for.

    For much of the running time this is pretty serious and believable movie, but it goes off the rails at the end. The female character, Carol (played by Janet Lynn), is apparently meant to be a homage to Christine Keeler (who the actress uncannily resembles), but while it was easy to see how a liberal-minded party girl like Keeler could find fame and fortune (or infamy and fortune) in the repressed Britain of the early 60's, it seems a lot less likely that this would happen ten years later when all the girls were pretty much giving it away for free. It also seems unlikely that these two shallow grasping characters would suffer all this humiliation only to grow a conscience AFTER they finally find wealth and success.

    In some ways this film resembles "Midnight Cowboy", but the characters are much more amoral and insensitive, so the film doesn't really achieve the same tragic, emotional depths. Still the two leads are very charismatic. I always liked Robin Askwith (even if his bare butt often logged more screen time in his movies than his face). Janet Lynn was unbelievably sexy as a schoolgirl who gets felt up by a lecherous schoolmaster in a brief scene in "Assault", so you can imagine what she is like in a meatier role that requires her to shed her clothes every five minutes. Mostly though it is nice to see a British sex film that is not preachy and moralistic, on one hand, or given over to horrible sub-Benny Hill style "comedy" on the other. Pete Walker does it again.
  • Two bored teenagers leave their small town and travel to London to try and live the dream. Soon, it becomes apparent that the boy's claims of a good job waiting for him are false and, so, before long they are destitute. To make money, the girl gets involved in the sex industry, starting with modelling and ending in porn films via prostitution, all of this actively encouraged by her boyfriend. Needless to say, life in the big city does not turn out to be very glamorous.

    This is an early film from British director Pete Walker, who is now known mainly on account of his horror movies, such as the impressive Frightmare (1974). In the earlier part of his career he seemed to be more focused on sexploitation, of which this is a pretty obvious example. It is a pretty good film of this type though, especially when you consider how terrible British entries in this category usually are. Funnily enough, a lot of the later atrocious 70's examples seemed to star Robin Askwith, who appears here in the role of the rather unsympathetic boyfriend. Janet Lynn stars opposite him as the girl who the story essentially revolves around and I thought she was pretty good. The film itself is basically a cautionary tale, which is fairly downbeat a lot of the time. The heavier elements actually make it a better film though, as it is sexploitation with at least some substance. A story which looks at the grim reality of aspects of the sexual revolution. Like in all the other Walker films I have seen it has unpleasant members of the older generation interfering aggressively with the young. On the whole, it can certainly be considered another very worthwhile film from Walker.