User Reviews (101)

Add a Review

  • Gislef14 May 1999
    Yes, I gave it a 2, dammit. The underwater photography is tolerable and there are a couple of suspenseful attacking moments. Basically, however, this movie rambles on pointlessly, much like the "walking catfish" mutant and the government agent who tracks him in the last third of the movie.

    The first 20 minutes of the movie is in (hilarious) voiceover, and you begin to wonder if they lost the soundtrack ala Creeping Terror and Beast of Yuca Flats. Then the characters actually start speaking on-screen and you wish they had lost the soundtrack. The dialogue seems to bear no resemblance to the onscreen goings-on. I suppose it establishes some plot points and clarifies things for the audience, but there are so many ramblings and offshoots that you just kinda of give up and give in.

    The "monster" looks like an early draft of a Silurian costume from Doctor Who, with a fur neckpiece (??). The skinny, balding bad guy is on-screen for only a few minutes before undergoing his transformation, but imprints himself indelibly in our minds thanks to his stripping down, his hamhanded maneuvering himself into the transformation tank, and his omniscient voiceover narration.

    And the fish! What is it with the fish? The opening narration dwells on them (giving us a good impression of Jacques Costeau as a Nazi gone bad), and at least one murder scene decides to insert random shots of fish in-between cuts. There seems to be some kind of implied ecological nature-takes-vengeance message here somewhere, but like everything else, it is lost entirely in the rambling dialogue.

    Basically, the movie is pretty much a waste of celluloid. A few good moments, as I've seen far worse underwater cinematography. Watch it if you dare.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is one ugly mama-jamma of a movie, incredibly cheap looking and badly made. It also appears to have been edited with a garden weasel. Countless mistakes were made about what film devices would tell the story and establish a mood, as opposed to those that would drop the ball and irritate the viewer. For my own amusement, (and hopefully, the reader's as well), I'd like to expound on a few of the most obvious.

    1) The monster costume. It looks as if it cost about a buck ninety-eight, and is possibly the most irritating monster costume to behold for extended periods of time since the pickle-stuffing sea monsters from "Horror At Party Beach". Since the monster is pretty much front-and-center for most of the movie, there is no getting away from this piece of crap. Every time I see it, I want to egg the director's house and pour sugar in the gas tank of his car.

    2) The opening song: A lugubrious folk-guitar thing, it contains the lyrical line, "Sashay through the sarcasm". This is perhaps the stupidest line in an opening theme song in the last 30 years.

    3) The stock footage: The director (or someone) apparently thought that if he spliced in stock footage of various lake and swamp creatures, he would establish a foreboding/foreshadowing of the world that Dr. Z hoped to create with his master plan. Or maybe he thought he was expressing the idea that Dr. Z was the embodiment of the rage and anger of the aquatic world, focused on mankind. Doesn't work, though. Typical example: the monster starts to kill a rival scientist, and the movie jumps to a 2 second shot of a bored looking catfish, then back to the monster killing the scientist, then to a 1 second shot of a shrimp. This isn't so much horrifying as it is incoherent.

    4) Odd choices on how to spend camera time: In a "real" movie, the actual mechanism used to put the subjects in the "transformation tank" wouldn't be anything to waste movie time with. The subjects would step in at gunpoint, or would be pushed in, or would dangle from their wrists from an overhead winch, or would locked into a tub and have the solution poured in on them...something like that. You wouldn't think about it, or even notice it.

    But here, the director spends what seems like 20% of the movie focusing on the block and tackle setup used to lower the subjects into the tank. Instead of experiencing the horror of the victims, we have to consider the endless ramification of pulley systems and sailor knots. After the fourth shot of the pulley system, I couldn't think of anything else. I am pretty sure that isn't what Barton had in mind.

    4) The sound design: This is actually pretty effective for the first part of the movie - lots of echos and swamp creature calls, etc. But then as the movie hits its climax when the INPIT agent starts across the swamp in his little buggy...and the soundtrack cuts in with a 30 second 'chase' music loop straight out of old Hanna-Barbera cartoons like "Jonny Quest" and "The Herculoids" . What the...??

    5) Speaking of the 'hero': he doesn't appear until 45 minutes into the movie. He then spends most of the next 25 minutes standing on the running boards of his Jeep as his team travels around as if he were Doc Savage or something. He then jumps into a six-wheeled Dune buggy thing (which looks like a toy that you would give your six year old) and drives hell bent into the swamp...only to stall out and bog down in the swamp in the very next scene. This makes him look like a complete idiot.

    Our rugged, dynamic hero and expert in biology and natural ecosystems then spends the next few scenes getting beaten to pieces while walking though the swamp; he then gets to the monster/scientist hideaway too late to save anyone else. Excuse me...was this supposed to be exciting? What was the point of this guy being here? And by the way, when the film cuts back to the hero SLOWLY S-L-O-G-G-I-N-G through the swamp, the Hanna-Barbera chase music starts back up again. What the...?

    6) Needless to say, no one in this movie can act, although the guy who plays the biologist has a certain amount of camera appeal.

    7) The lighting, color values and camera-work: many of the shots used here, especially in the underwater sequences, are enough to make you lose your appetite. Everything is slimy, grainy, dingy, dull, and dirty. This may have been intentional, but it only adds to the viewer's distress at having to sit though this movie.

    Anyway, enough. "ZAAT", or "Blood Waters..." or whatever it is, wouldn't even cut it as the bottom entry at a Saturday night drive-in triple feature. Avoid like the plague, unless you are a serious devotee of grade Z horror films. Even MST3K couldn't save this one, except for the bumper segment where Crow harangues Mike from the ceiling with a parody of the mad scientist's opening voice-over: "Saddle soap...cleaning compound of deceit!"

    Oh yes, and the line, "I need another bowl of Zoloft!"
  • Mad scientist Dr. Kurt Leopold (Marshall Grauer) uses his special formula, Zaat, to turn himself into a walking catfish (although he looks more like a mutant seahorse to me). After polluting a local pond with Zaat, the lumbering catfish man takes revenge on those who scoffed at his work, and then goes about trying to create a catfish woman to be his mate.

    The first fifteen minutes of low budget Floridian monster movie Zaat (AKA The Blood Waters of Dr.Z) are enough to sort the men from the boys: anyone not seriously dedicated to Z-grade trash will surely soon fall by the wayside at the sheer banality of the opening scenes -- underwater wildlife footage with a monotonous voice-over, and tedious shots of scientist Dr. Leopold as he goes about his work. At the quarter-of-an-hour mark, things momentarily pick up when Leopold turns into catfish man (the creature played by Wade Popwell) and goes on the prowl, but it's still far from great, any amusement to be had at the shoddiness of the monster costume quickly wearing off.

    The rest of the film is mostly long, drawn out scenes of badly lit and very boring 'action' as the monster roams the countryside and town while the authorities investigate, but, every so often, director Don Barton throws in something so bizarre that one can't help but sit up and take notice. A prime example is the hippie musical interlude in which a group of long-haired layabouts sit and sway while a man sings and plays guitar. The town's sheriff arrives and taps his hand appreciatively, before leading the hippies on a Pied Piper style procession to the town jail, where he locks up the youngsters for their own safety. It's a really weird scene that has zero bearing on the plot -- the hippies are never heard of or seen again.

    Another head-scratching moment comes when the creature gets a headache and needs some aspirin (at least I think that is what happens): breaking into a pharmacy, it knocks back some meds (getting a little woozy in the process) and then trashes the place. Again, just a really incongruous scene that serves no real purpose other than to pad out the runtime (not that the film needed padding out, the finished mess clocking in at an excruciating 100 minutes).

    Other bits that are notable for their eccentricity include the monster taking time out to draw a picture of sexy blonde INPIT Agent Martha Walsh (Sanna Ringhaver) -- he's actually not a bad artist for a fish -- and an unconvincing shot of a supposedly giant catfish destroying a miniature matchstick model of a fence, the only remnant of a Kaiju-catfish sequence cut from the final film on account of it looking so crap.

    To be honest, I probably would have rated Zaat a rather generous 3/10 for chucking in these truly weird moments amid the deathly dull stuff, but the film commits a crime against trash cinema that is unforgivable: sexy Agent Walsh is about to undress when she is interrupted, zipping up her red jumpsuit just as things were getting interesting, and then she takes a shower without any nudity. Just what kind of cheap, exploitative, Z-grade monster movie is this? I'm left no other choice than to deduct a couple of points.
  • An idiotic scientist decides to turn himself into a walking catfish monster. He also wants to create a new race of fellow walking catfish monsters. This is a horrible movie. It starts off with some laughable narration and an awful folk song. It only gets worse from there. That said, I was cracking up a lot throughout this thing. There's one golden moment shortly after the guy has changed into monster form. He's walking through a basement and clearly trips over something, perhaps the shitty monster costume itself. We're also privy to the long, drawn out process of him getting his machines, pulleys and other junk together for the mutation. This takes up about 20 minutes of screen time all by itself.

    About halfway through the film, we get more awful singing from a bunch of hippies, followed by a march to the local jail. The so-called hero of the picture is a joke. He and his girlfriend also wear ridiculous red jumpsuits. They should have just stuck with the college guy and the sheriff, not that doing so would have saved the movie or anything. This is currently #10 on the IMDb bottom 100 list. There's no question that this is a bad movie, but I wouldn't rate it that low simply because of the amusement I got out of it.
  • I first read about this movie as being called ZaAt. Then I actually watch it under the name "Attack of the Swamp Monsters." THEN I hear about it once again as The Blood Island of Dr. Z as showed on MST 3k. I have not seen the MST 3k version of this movie, but one has to admit, they would have a LOT to work with. The lighting of this movie was terrible, the kill scenes were very short, the mask! Well, the mask is very self explanatory.

    One thing that boggled my mind was after the monster tipped the boat, there were two people floating in the water, while one scrambled to shore. One person in the water was still moving their hands even though it's my best guess that the catfish monster killed them. And then when the monster went up on the land to kill the other person, HE DIDN'T EVEN TOUCH THE PERSON!!! It looked like he just swept a bug off of her chest and she just went limp!!! What?!? I'm no corroner, but I know that somebody doesn't die from being brushed, even if it is by a catfish type monster. My biggest complaint as in every 70's movie, was the lighting. I have never seen worse lighting in my life. You could use the indiglo of a watch and see what was happening better than the lighting from this movie. But what was so bad about it was that there was bad lighting during scenes that looked like they were important, like the fight scene between the people of INPET (shoulda been named "INEPT") and the monster. That looked like it could have been a big scene, if only we could have seen what was going on. And how about those fresh water underwater scenes, you know, with the coral and tropical fish and currents and all. That must have seen some fresh water pond to house coral. Last time I checked, coral doesn't grow in fresh water, never mind that it grew in a pond.

    Well, I'll let you watch to enjoy the rest of the movie, although I do suggest you go out and rent the non-MST 3k version, just because sometimes it's fun to enjoy a movie without someone telling you what's funny about it.
  • Crazy scientist living in the Florida swamps turns himself into a monstrous walking fish-man and proceeds to terrorize.

    Another drive in low-budgeter that probably would have been more at home in the 1950's rather than the early 70's. It's weird and cheap schlock all the way! The big rubber monster of the film is quite cheesy looking as it teeters around the swamps and struggles to swim in underwater scenes. The zippers of the monster suit are "hidden" by patches of fur. Zaat seems to have all of the hokey B flick trappings - a silly storyline, lackluster acting, crude editing, and a folksy theme song. Also there's a bikini-wearing girl who gets kidnapped by the monster to cap it off.

    Now ordinarily such campy qualities might be downright charming to a B horror fan such as myself, unfortunately Zaat is just too roughly-made and ultimately ridiculous for its own good. Not the worst of its kind, it certainly beats the similarly themed 1966 movie Curse of the Swamp Creature, but Zaat leaves much to be desired.

    Then again, what other horror film is there where the monster robs a drugstore?

    * 1/2 out of ****
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I saw this film under the title, The Blood Waters of Dr. Z on the cult riffing show Mystery Science Theater 3000. Apparently, it is more commonly known by the title Zaat and though I am sure there is a lot of movie that MST3K did not show, I am rather sure it still would have been a very poor movie. The main problem with it? No matter how much more gory it might have been, no matter if there was nudity you cannot ignore the fact the monster of this film looks and acts horribly! Seriously, the monster in this one does not look as good as a monster in a Roger Corman film from the 50's, the monster in Night of the Blood Beast looks more intimidating! Basically, the thing is supposed to be part man and part fish...part catfish that is, which is absurd to begin with. The body portion of the costume is very dumpy and the head looks like a joke as the mouth looks like it is a set of novelty vampire fangs! The Creature From the Black Lagoon looks way better than this thing and once again it is from an older film. If the looks of the thing were not bad enough then it is the fact I have never seen a more nonthreatening monster in terms of its movements. It is constantly tripping and stumbling and movie and swimming at a snail's pace, and the audience is supposed to believe this thing is a threat?

    The story has a man talking over a bunch of clips of fish, making one almost think this is a nature documentary read by a deranged man. You see, Dr. Leopold wants to turn himself into a fish and rally the other fish to his cause to take over the world! His partner in crime, the walking catfish! Other than a scene where Leopold talks about how they achieve movement over land, you do not really see them do anything as far a terror. Dr. Leopold soon turns himself into the most embarrassing looking monster ever and begins his quest for world domination as he tries to kidnap an attractive blond and turn her into his mate. Meanwhile, the heroes of this piece consist of a sheriff, some sort of water guy and two agents who wear orange jumpsuits. The are the most incompetent group ever as they literally could have just went to Dr. Leopold's house and set up an ambush and probably wiped the floor with him.

    This made for a very funny episode of MST3K as the film provided plenty of riffing material. As I've stated, the monsters looks, the strange voice over with the fish clips, the monster kills and the strange scene involving an off camera mom who you never see. You don't even see her car! The episode gets a bit boring during the stretch where the guy is riding the door and they are just driving, but then ramps back up when the one guy wants to track the beast in his little toy car/boat and then proceeds to stumble through the swamp letting you know that the monster simply lucked out in this one as he had the four most incapable heroes ever.

    So the movie is rather bad and I am going to guess seeing an unedited version would not improve it much. That being said, I would almost like to see an unedited version to see what was taken out and see if maybe there is a scene depicting the giant catfish and see if maybe there was any nudity in this one as there were a couple of instances where there looked like there might of been. I don't think the kills would get much better as one of the kills they showed had the monster with a hand already full of blood swipe past a young man it was killing. Still, as bad as it was, it is still a rather amusing film to watch and made for a very funny episode of MST3K.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Terrible. That's the only way I can think to describe this film. From the opening shot of the scientist strolling along(like we want to waste our time watching some guy take a Sunday walk!) while the worst,most drab folk song that I have ever heard plays in the background(sashay through the sarcasm?! What does that even mean, for chrissake?!) To the end shot of the girl moseying into the ocean to become mate to the stupid looking monster that the doctor transforms into, this movie is just dreadful. The voice-overs are annoying, the acting is pitiful, the soundtrack dull, the cinematography makes it look like it was shot in a foreign country by someone with a home-made video camera, and the plot is just eye popping. Killer walking catfish?! A scientist turinng himself into what looks like a really old, wrinkly Gumby? All so that the crazy old ex-Nazi can get his revenge on a bunch of guys who might have bumped into him in the hall once, or whatever? What was the screenwriter smoking? And did he share it with the director?

    I think that the whole purpose of the film was the girl in the yellow bikini. There certainly were long enough shots of her walking around her camp, swimming in the water, brushing her hair, etc. Not that she wasn't easier on the eye than the old scientist(when he stripped down to his skivvies to transform, I almost lost my lunch). Still, she had Director's Girlfriend written across her forehead. How many of these F grade movies get made so that the guy making them can get a date? Bet most of them-maybe all of them.
  • Granted, I wasn't expecting much from this 1971 movie when I sat down to watch in here in 2020. But hey, I hadn't seen it before - nor even heard about it - and so I thought I would sit down to watch it, as it might actually be a good movie.

    Well, turns out that the storyline in "Zaat" was rather generic and mundane, offering very little of great entertainment to the audience. The plot was fairly straight forward, for sure, but it just wasn't a particularly compelling or interesting storyline all together. It just amazes me that with four writers, that they couldn't come up with something more wholehearted than what this movie turned out to be.

    The acting in the movie was adequate for most parts, aside from the dubious acting in the first part of the movie before the guy turned into the amphibious creature.

    For a movie from 1971, then I will say that the special effects weren't all that impressive. Perhaps back in the day they were passable on the screen, but they have not withstood the test of time with grace. The creature design was fairly shoddy, and it was blatantly obvious that it was just a guy in a rubber suit walking and swimming about. And the design of the head for the amphibious creature was just abysmal, it looked horrible and distorted.

    No wonder I had never heard about "Zaat" before I got the chance to sit down to watch it, and I hadn't been missing out on a particularly great or outstanding moment in cinema history.

    I am rating "Zaat" a mere three out of ten stars, as the movie was watchable, albeit not entertaining. And "Zaat" is not a movie that warrants more than a single viewing, especially since just getting through the first viewing was something of an ordeal in itself.
  • Part of this was shot in Jacksonville, Florida. You talk about a putrid film. The plot drags on and on with no exposition except for a pathetic voice-over from the "villiain" who tells us all that they think he's mad, and "he'll show them someday".

    Anyway, after about 20 minutes of showing us this bad guy playing around with all sorts of pseudo-Frankenstein lab stuff, he finally turns into a walking fish-man. Now look, the costume REALLY isn't that bad. It is kind of freaky looking, but you cannot make a film based on one kinda-cool outfit. Anyway, this bad guy swims around squirting lakes and other fish with a squirt bottle...for what purpose, we have NO idea, then he swims and attacks some old guy on a boat. Later we learn it is one of these guys who called him "mad". More swimming, some pathetic gawking at a woman painting and camping by the lake in a bikini, then back to the murder. Later monster boy tries to take the girl and turn HER into a "Mrs. Monster" but he fails. Oh, we see another 20 minutes or so of the monster piddling with the Frankenstein equipment...like we're so stupid we don't realize what he's trying to do. MST3K did this flick, and it was hard to enjoy even when THEY did it...this is bad on the MANOS, THE HANDS OF FATE kind of level. Watch if you REALLY want to go to sleep, but have to have the TV on anyway.
  • Even though I watch a lot of bad movies, it's been awhile since I've seen a plot that made less sense than the one found in Blood Waters of Dr. Z. For reasons known only to him, Dr. Kurt Leopold decides the planet would be a better place if fish were to take over. After a rather lengthy voice-over soliloquy on the subject, he dunks himself into a tank and comes out transformed into some sort of poorly designed would-be fish-creature. With his handy spray bottle filled with I'm not sure what, he sets out on his mission to lead the catfish in a takeover of the Earth. Before you can say "carp", Dr. Leopold's plan seems to be forgotten in favor of finding a mate he can transform into a would-be fish-creature. (Actually, I'm of the opinion that getting laid was Dr. Leopold's goal the whole time. Forget about the nonsense of a master race of fish.) As the bodies start to pile up, old fish-boy soon has some scientists and the local sheriff on his tail. Can they put a stop to Dr. Leopold and his plans for world domination?

    Whether you call the movie Blood Waters of Dr. Z or Zaat or ZaAt or Attack of the Swamp Creatures, it really doesn't matter. Crap by any name is still crap. The movie is Grade A bottom-of-the-barrel film-making. As I pointed out, the plot is ridiculous. The technical aspects of the films like lighting, sound, special effects, editing, etc. are beyond bad. The direction is amateurish at best. And as for the acting, I'm not in the least surprised to discover that no one involved ever did anything other than appear in this monstrosity (okay, one guy does have one other credit, but that's it). Quite honestly, my rating of a 2/10 is incredibly generous. I'm sure there's a reason I didn't give Blood Waters of Dr. Z the dreaded 1/10, but sitting here 12 hours after watching the movie, I can't come up with a valid explanation.

    One of the comments on IMDb bemoans the fact that the majority of people rating and reviewing Blood Waters of Dr. Z have only seen the Mystery Science Theater 3000 version (that's how I saw it also). The comment states that the real movie has 30 or so minutes edited out by the MST3K crew and the movie shouldn't be judged unless someone has seen the whole thing. Well why in God's name would I want to see 30 more minutes of this trash! The time I've already devoted to Blood Waters of Dr. Z is above and beyond what it deserves. Just be glad more people haven't seen that additional footage as I'm guessing the rating would be even lower if they had.
  • The opening is classic and there is no escaping that fact. It starts with stock footage of exotic predator fish and an insane sounding man doing narration over the scenes professing his adoration of them. Then it shows probably the least threatening looking man to ever be born staring at the water. As he shuffles slowly back to his lab, the credits role and they are bright yellow letters and have the kind of font you'd expect in a campy beach comedy/musical from the 60s. While they roll, an embarrassingly dramatic sounding folk song is playing. As the character slowly (he almost looks like he struggles) makes his way back to his lab, the lyrics "sashay through the sarcasm" and variations to that grab your attention. You have three genres colluding at once now all driving the viewer to think something different! Comedy, drama or horror? Never has a film done that!! Then the mad doctor is in his lab as the credits and folk music stop. The lab has all the usually goofy sounds and machines that look like they were broken pinball machines. The narration picks up again. He desires to be turned into a half man half walking catfish. Finally, he makes his preperations. You see this same unfortunate man unfortunately strip down to his boxer shorts, lay on a stretcher hooked up to a pully then dunk himself into a pool. The score by this time is heavy droning electronic music which adds to the, uh..mm, menace of it all. He transforms into a giant goofy looking monster and exclaims when seeing himself in the mirror "NOTHING AT ALL LIKE A CATFISH BUT ITS BEAUTIFUL!!" There is nothing like this opening. Thst alone gets it 9 stars. It is beyond classic.

    After that, the movie slows way down and gets dull when it was supposed to be thrilling. I imagine this film sold really well in Europe because it has the kind of enigmatic ending their films are known for and perhaps that was always going to be the intended market. And of course that opening is......everything.
  • ratebait8 May 2010
    The IMDb correctly discourages comments from referencing other comments, but since ZAAT has the honor of being one of the IMDb's lowest rated films, it's appropriate to pay a nod to one of the chief forces behind its low rating. This main reason ties in with the peculiarity of a rarely seen and relatively unavailable film getting as high as over 2,000 votes.

    A reviewer from Tennessee got to the heart of this matter in his 2007 IMDb user's essay; he addressed another IMDb comment that bemoaned the majority of the reviewers having only seen ZAAT in its Mystery Science Theater 3000 dissection, which also happened to be the way the Tennessee reviewer saw the film. The MST3K crew cut out over a half-hour, so the IMDb reviewers who based their thoughts on the MST3K's put-down presentation didn't even see the whole film. "Why in God's name would I want to see 30 more minutes of this trash!" was the Tennessean's response.

    It is patently unfair to review a film on a version the purpose of which was to poke fun at the film. It is as if a film is judged not by watching the film, but by reading the MAD Magazine satire of it. And it especially becomes unfair if the satirized version has been abridged -- that's like a book reviewer who reviews a book based on only some chapters.

    Add to this formula the cynicism of a newer generation, who thinks it's "cool" to put down media-presented efforts; by doing so, such people think they are being smarter, and what a nice way to feel better.

    Of course ZAAT is a "bad" movie. Amateurish and logically-challenged -- for example, why would the sheriff not have drawn his gun on the approaching monster? (But don't get me started on the many places this movie has gone wrong; at this writing, there are about 70 reviews you can read, most of which will happily point out the absurdities.)

    Yet I entered into this debacle with exactly such low expectations. And yes, there were drawn-out scenes that were not easy to sit through. All in all, however, if you know what you're going to be in for, you accept the vehicle for what it is, and it is your attitude that is going to affect your judgment, and your ultimate enjoyment.

    I can honestly say there are many uninspired and forgettable films that are far more polished and professional than ZAAT, but for all ZAAT's inanities, I could appreciate the effort that went into ZAAT. The producer obviously had a very low budget (I'd imagine his contacts with the Florida Marine facility might have inspired the "plot" -- without money, a film can be designed around the locations and other assets), yet still managed to come up with a stupidly imaginative film.

    I appreciated the quality of the monster suit, for one thing -- given what must have been the restraints of the budget and the local special effects talent. Some of the dialogue was actually pretty clever. The fact that a black character was chosen as one of the heroes was admirable -- it was only a few years earlier that Romero's NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD had helped break the mold in this area, at least for horror movies. The director and/or editor also tried hard at times to add some excitement, for example with the insert shots during the attack on the scientist in his house. And the female victim was very beautiful. (With a movie like this, you've got to appreciate what you get.)

    I'm giving the film a few undeserved stars as a reaction against the numerous IMDb snobs who don't even have the decency to watch the real thing. And for those who have taken in the real thing, what DO these people expect when they watch a locally made monster movie from the 1970s that defines the word "cheesy"? On that level, ZAAT delivers in spades.
  • This film begins with what appears to be stock footage of undersea creatures during which completely irrelevant narration from Dr. Leopold intones loudly...and inanely. Then, after it finally finishes, the credits roll--and the audience is left completely baffled. Sadly, after the credits roll, the annoying narration continues with some prattle about 'walking fish'. Yeah, whatever. All I know is that this was really annoying and seemed to go on and on and on and make no sense. Finally, this is replaced by some loud and equally annoying whirring and old fashion computer sounds. The entire first 15-20 minutes of the film is nothing but that irritating and nonsensical sort of claptrap.

    After all this annoyance and exposition, the doctor has now become some goofy sea monster--much like the ones you see in THE HORROR OF PARTY BEACH and other such 60s laughable crap. When my wife saw him, she began snickering. Thankfully, she knows me well enough that she didn't bother telling me what she thought of the film--she knew I had to get my horrible movie fix! In a brilliant move, once he transformed, now even MORE annoying sound effects are repeatedly thrown at the audience in an apparent attempt to drive them from the theaters for several more minutes. In fact, the sound track and sound effects for this film might just be the most annoying of any film in history. Also, inexplicably, the camera keeps jumping back and forth from the lame action to stock film of water animals--and it all seems so very irrelevant and cheap.

    Apparently the plot has something to do with revenge or making a female creature like himself or something, but it's never very clear. What IS clear is that the film appears to have almost no script or direction. And, because of this, too often scenes are overplayed or repeated again and again without much regard to the story. It's really just a mess...a cheap and silly mess. Not surprisingly, this is writer/producer/director Don Barton's only film--it was just THAT bad! It is the most irritating film I have ever seen when it comes to the sound track and among the worst overall--with only MANOS HANDS OF FATE being the only film I can readily think of that is worse overall. That's saying a lot because I have seen most of the films of Al Adamson, Ed Wood, Ted Mikels, Larry Buchanan and many other of the worst film makers ever--and this one is WORSE. Clearly, it deserves its place as the current #8 worst film of all time on the IMDb list--though perhaps this is a bit too generous. This pile of crap at least gets my vote for most annoyingly loud film of all time.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I actually really liked this film, but I am also a big fan of cheap, trashy, ugly little films from the 60s and 70s. This is one of the cheapest and ugliest, but it has a rough appeal to it nonetheless.

    A nerdy, evil little scientist who looks like Elmer Fudd decides to turn himself into a giant fish monster, and succeeds...sort of. Actually, it looks like he slapped some mud on a gas mask and donned a suit made of out dirty Glad garbage bags. But if you like your monsters goofy, you'll like this one. Anyway, our bad tempered fish monster goes on a killing spree in remote Florida. When he's not killing, he's ogling a beautiful blond in a bikini and a conveniently beautiful scientist whose fatal mistake was to disrobe in front of the window and put on a pretty sun dress.

    This film is absolutely ludicrous, but it's also a lot of fun. The unhappy ending was not something I saw coming, and was a shock since this film seemed to so very badly want to recapture the glory days of mad-scientist-making-monsters-in-their-basement-labs movies from the 50s. If you want to see a lot of truly stupid yokels getting killed, then this movie is for you. It's just bad enough to be entertaining.
  • After seeing this movie... I had... (sob, sob)... most disturbing... no, wait... BORING nightmares. This movie nearly put me to sleep! I was surprised I was actually able to stay awake through it. I found no real merit to watching this movie whatsoever. Summing up all that sucked, well: the acting was dry, the soundtrack was corny, the plot (or lacking thereof) was totally lame, and the monster looked pretty stupid. There is no reason at all anyone should watch this. In fact, there should be a warning from the surgeon general about his movie on the box.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I consider myself a connoisseur of bad movies, but this one is really something special. Compared to this, Plan 9, The Room, Manos: Hands of Fate, and even Killer Shrews are all masterpieces.

    There are unanswered questions in almost all movies, but there are simply so many in this one:

    • First and foremost, why exactly did crossing a man with a catfish seem like a good way to rule the world?


    • Why do they keep cutting to a sea turtle during his attacks?


    • What did the octopus have to do with *anything*?


    • Why did the guy who was following him still need the Geiger counter *after* he had him in plain sight. While we're on the subject, why didn't he simply shoot him at that point?


    • Why didn't the sheriff use the gun in his hand? Opting for a fist fight with a man/catfish really seemed like questionable judgment.


    • While we're on the subject, where did that gun go?


    • Finally, they rescued the girl *before* he did anything to her, so why did she decide to become a fish at the end? Was she bowled over by his charm?


    Anyway, all I can say is wow. Just, wow.
  • A lot of people were exposed to Blood Waters of Dr Z through MST3K, myself included. The episode wasn't one of the classics, but it was funny and summed up very well what was wrong with the movie. The movie itself is one of the kind that makes your jaw drop just at the thought of it. The underwater photography is not so bad, beautiful is not how I describe it but it is the asset that is the least amateurish regarding Blood Waters of Dr Z. The rest is amateurish through and through, and the flaws are so numerous that the underwater photography is not enough to salvage. The rest of the camera work and editing though is nauseating, it hardly ever is still, and even for a genre movie the movie's colour scheme was much too drab. The monster was very non-threatening and looked ridiculous, not many movies I've seen recently have had a monster that looks like a man masquerading in a monster suit like he's at a fancy dress party but Blood Waters of Dr Z gives off that vibe in a painfully obvious way. The soundtrack is equally monotonous, with a song that is dull and really quite stupid, and it is one of those soundtracks that actually sounds as though it should be somewhere else. The dialogue is laughably cheesy and stilted, made even worse by the vapid and really annoying voice-overs, the attack scenes have no suspense or vitality(they are actually done so badly that I even couldn't deem them as unintentionally hilarious) and the story- the kind that is good concept-wise but badly executed- is senseless, filled with the brim with things left hanging there with no explanation and full of interminably plodding exposition and no sense of dread at all. The characters are annoying and undeveloped, often coming and going with no reason as to doing so, and the acting is just laughable from all involved. Overall, I've seen worse but that's saying a huge amount as Blood Waters of Dr Z is still terrible, one of the lamest monster movies almost certainly brought to celluloid. 1/10 for the underwater photography only. Bethany Cox
  • Just like Free Willy, The Bear, or any Pauly Shore movie, this flick was just a marketing ploy to get me to buy walking catfish t-shirts, catfish video games, and Popeil's Pocket Fisherman. This cute and cuddly creature, which walks like my aunt after her hip replacement surgery, will only be served blackened with red beans and rice in my home.

    P.S...That Nazi-Fish guy was great! He really knew how to pick up women.
  • urto1231 March 2012
    Warning: Spoilers
    Ever the fan of bad movies, I checked this out recently, and it did not let me down, in the sense that it really let me down. It's a typical low-budget monster movie with a really bad costume, subpar actors, and some shoddy camera-work.

    The story is about a doctor who is really uppity that the world doesn't like fish as much as he does, so he does the rational thing and turns himself into an amphibious monster in hopes of conquering the world. Somewhere in there, he also wants to prove to some former colleagues of his that he wasn't a maniac after all by maniacally killing them, and he also needs to find a suitable female, turn her into a monster, and breed with her so this monster race can rule the world.

    Ultimately, it's not a terrible plot idea for a monster movie, but the execution just sucks. You really only have a vague idea of what he's trying to do and why he's trying to do it. Furthermore, the first thirty minutes of the movie seems to be just him randomly going back and forth between his lab to stare at charts and the swamplands of Florida to scare the crap out of people.

    The worst thing contributing to the concept of a "decent idea gone bad" here is the camera-work. All I can really say is that whenever you've watched a shot long enough to understand what's going on and are ready for a new shot to begin so that more information can be conveyed to you, that's about the point when there will be ten to fifteen seconds left of said shot. They all just last a tiny bit too long, and it really starts to grind away at your tolerance of other aspects of the movie.

    The truly notable thing about this movie is the awful hero, who I would probably consider the worst of all time. To summarize exactly what he does in the movie, he is completely absent from it for the first half or so. When he shows up, he still doesn't really have any purpose, so he just kind of does nothing important for another 20 minutes. Finally, he decides to go to the antagonist's lair and end it once and for all. Unfortunately, he gets bitten by a snake on the way there and dies. What a champ.

    Despite all of the terrible camera-work, annoying characters, and poor plot progression, the ending of this movie is a surprisingly iconic scene that will stick with you for a ways to come, even if everything leading up to that moment of cinematic serenity was a pretty much detestable and haphazard.

    In the end, the plot and effects of this movie are about two decades too late for it to be a quality flick on a serious scale, and the non-story elements (camera, music, lighting, scene transitioning) are too irritating for it to have the charm of a quality B-movie. Every so often, it seems to get something right, perhaps showing it had some potential, but it's still just not a good movie on any level.
  • As someone might have noticed I occasionally watch bad movies because sometimes I can enjoy a bad movie for having a good laugh. There are movies like ROBOT MONSTER and PLAN 9 that are great fun to watch because of their camp value. Unfortunately not all bad movies are both bad and enjoyable, and ZAAT (known also as BLOOD WATERS OF DR Z) is one of them.

    In the beginning we see underwater footage of sea creatures (scorpion fish, shark, stingray) narrated by Dr. Leopold, with an annoying voice that grates on the viewer's nerves where he talks of walking catfish. After these first 3 minutes we have a closeup of the main character and credits roll (during which Leopold walks home to his laboratory). Here, we have again annoying narration and weird laboratory sounds that make the viewer even more irritated.

    After 15 minutes of this nonsense, the doctor transforms in a creepy looking water monster and he goes to the river for a swim, then he returns to his lab and he plans to kill the people that angered and laughed at him in the past. In this part the soundtrack is very annoying on a continuous loop and if this wasn't already enough, the camera from time to time jumps from the creature's actions to footage of water-dwelling animals to the people in the town that want to get rid of the creature. And even at 50 minutes in, to a group of hippies that ends in jail (while stalked by the creature).

    Apparently the scientist transformed himself in a water creature for revenge or for making a creature similar to himself, but in the end, it's not that important because it's not even explained. The only thing that the viewer will notice is that the movie has no direction. In fact this movie is only a stupid and disastrous mess. And when it comes to badness the only movies that come close to this one are MANOS THE HANDS OF FATE and BEAST OF YUCCA FLATS. This is hardly a glowing endorsement, because I saw various B-movies from the 1950s and 1960s and with a few exceptions they are MUCH better compared to this mess. This movie truly deserved to be in the old Bottom 100 as it's the most lazy, dull and painful to watch movie that I have ever seen. Though, I have to admit it, its score of 2,5 is perhaps a bit too generous!
  • ericstevenson26 July 2016
    Warning: Spoilers
    This movie tells the story of a mad scientist who turns himself into a catfish monster wanting to capture a girl and take over the world. That is absolutely all the plot that this movie has at all. There is literally nothing else you need to say about this. The whole movie has little dialogue and is mostly just the monster walking around trying to find a mate. He kills some people and that's about it. It's just a mad scientist who wants to take over the world. The narration at the beginning is amazingly stupid. Why wasn't he speaking directly in that? Why does it take so long to fight the monster?

    At the end, the monster just wins as the woman walks into the sea after him. I guess he brainwashed her or something. This makes the entirely movie pointless and is something that could have literally been shown in a few minutes. All the characters are pointless and contribute nothing. I have no idea what "Zaat" means and I don't care. It's still twice as good as "They Saved Hitler's Brain" or at least by this star system. As I gave it zero stars, it doesn't really make sense at all. *
  • I think this is one of the best rubber suited monster on the loose flicks of all time! A Cult Classic Sci-Fi / Horror / Thriller. It was made in Jacksonville, Florida in 1971. By Don Barton's new film company. He Produced & Directed the film. The film is about a crazy mad scientist type doctor named Leopold. That is experimenting with Catfish & other forms of Ocean Life. His fellow colleagues ridiculed him. He wants to turn himself into this catfish man type monster & wreak vengeance on those who ridiculed him. Also wants to find a female to transform & mate wit to starts a new aquatic race. It was aired on MST3K because it is one of the truly bad B Movies. A so bad it's good type. Not much more to say about the film. IMDb.com has 1975 as the release year which is wrong it was made in 1971 & released in theaters in 1972. First it was unofficially released on VHS in the U.S. in 1982 under the title "Attack Of The Swamp Creature" Hosted by Elvira, Mistress Of The Dark as part of the Thriller Video Series. The film only runs 96 mins. not including Elvira which she comes on before the movie starts also there is a middle spot & after the film is over she comes on one last time with her it runs about 105 mins. The actual movie run time is 99 mins. The Attack VHS version of the film has fake credits also missing scenes. Then in 1987 it was unofficially released again this time as "Hydra" on VHS in Canada. Which preserves the films entire 99 min. run time. The print is decent even though it is pretty scratchy with specs of dirt & blemishes. I did transfer both versions to DVD+R back in 2005. It would be nice to see it available on DVD some day. In 2000 the film was rescued from the ravages digitally remastered from original 35mm negative. Also released officially for the first time ever with no fake title & or credits. This was a 30th Anniversary Limited Edition Collector's VHS Video in Hi-Fi Stereo that was only available for a limited time. Besides the movie being digitally remastered it also includes exclusive bonus features. Including a Video Introduction by Producer/Director Don Barton, Original Theatrical Trailer, T.V. Spots, Still Gallery & last some Rare Outtake Footage. I am lucky enough to have a DVD-R copy on hand that I just got a few days ago. I hunted high & low for this for years. Which when it first came out in 2000 it was priced at $29.99. Which it was only available until 2002. Only 500 Copies were made also I believe. Sadly I never got a chance to get the actual VHS. Maybe some day I will find it. Even though the film is regarded as one of the worst B Movies ever made. Fans of rubber suited monsters movies will have a special place in their hearts for it & look on it as one of the best of the genre. A lot better then say "Bog" finished & supposed to be released in 1978 but wasn't released theatrically until 1983. Zaat also gained a huge cult following of devoted fans. Was one of Top Grossing Independent Films of 1972. The Collector's VHS is the best version that was available & the fans that own it are lucky enough to have it as I don't ever see a DVD release of it soon. It took long enough just to get it commercially available on VHS. Just in time for it's 30th Anniversary too! The film was also screened again at one or numerous theaters down in Jacksonville, Florida. Some of the cast & crew also gathered to meet eager fans & also a whole new younger generation of fans that learned of the film from their parents. It was a pretty big event down in Florida back in 2000. This is one of my favorite out of the Rubber Suited Monster Flicks of the 70's & of all time I give it 8 out of 10 for it's type!
  • Undoubtedly 95% of the people who have reviewed this film have only seen it on Mystery Science Theater 3000. I can be certain of this because I know for a fact it was never legally licensed for distribution on video or television and this includes the MST3K showings. I think it is unfair to review this film based on inferior prints and sloppy editing. Let's face it, the MST3K airings cut almost 30 minutes out of the film so their segments could be added and they talked through the whole movie. Regardless of how good or bad you think the film is, is it fair to judge the film at all in this form? This by no means the way the people who made it intended for it to be seen. I have seen the original version of the film and it makes a lot more sense and looks a lot better than the version MST3K altered considerably. I enjoyed the film because it comes across as a 1950's style horror film made in the 70's. Their is no nudity or profainity and the violence in minimal and not graphic. The creature is unique and it's background is interesting (when you get to see that part of the story). I also picked up on the similarities between the INPIT organization and today's concept of the X-Files. Overall when the fiolm is seen as intended I think it makes for a pretty entertaining viewing and isn't being entertained what films are all about?
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The movie starts with an exceedingly inane narration overlayed on some kind of nature show about fishes. It then moves on to show the narrator, a scientist type guy, who bumbles about his bleepy, bloopy blinking lights laboratory doing sciency stuff. He then strips (not a pretty sight) and immerses himself in a pool full of red water, by which he is turned into a hilarious looking "walking catfish monster" (guy in ugly rubber suit).

    Said monster then spends the rest of the movie bumbling about in much the same way science guy did, only the monster kills people instead of doing science, all set to swamp sounds like "wuuuh" and the like, plenty of clips of water creatures spliced in for good measure.

    Meanwhile, hero type and love interest girl have shown up in their camper van and red jumpsuits, accompanied by overly dramatic music where ever they go. It takes them a good half an hour to figure out who the monster is and where to find him, then hero type spends the rest of the movie stumbling through a swamp in search of the monster and his kidnapped girlfriend. Final fight ensues, the end.

    As you can tell, the film is mostly a lot of boring stumbling and bumbling, not really moving in any direction. When anything does happen it is often rather ridiculous, and the monster, which is the main focus, is ridiculous all the time.
An error has occured. Please try again.