User Reviews (65)

Add a Review

  • I played a Russian army officer. I remember the director chewing me out in Japanese and with animated gestures, because I was not standing with as rigid and military a posture as was expected of an army officer. I was on set with many of the lead actors: Chuck Connors, well past his "Rifleman" days, quipped between takes: "Not bad for fourteen grand a day." Bo Svenson: He carried a whoopie cushion and sidled up to people, making fart sounds, which he thought was hilarious. He also took a lot of pride in showing us his underwater demolition license. George Kennedy: Self-absorbed, sullen and forbidding, spoke with no one. Those three were all really big, tall men. Edward J. Olmos: Nice guy, friendly, engaging. Cec LInder: Liked to play poker between scenes. A very elegant gentleman, exuded mentshlekhkayt. Olivia Hussey: Stayed in her dressing room most of the time, listening to Bob Dylan on a cassette-player. One time, she made her way to the set to watch a scene being filmed and said "hello." She was a breathtakingly beautiful woman, famous for being in Zefirelli's "Romeo and Juliet."

    This, I'll never forget ( and no disrespect intended): Local Toronto actor Ara Hovanessian was cast in a small part. He had a dressing room with his name written on a piece of paper tacked to the door. Figuring it would be a positive career move -???- he tore off the "essian," and re-named himself there and then. I can still that crudely ripped piece of paper in my mind. Ah, show-business . . .

    Wolf Krakowski Kame'a Media: www.kamea.com
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I came across "Virus" on DVD at the dollar store recently, and though I'd never heard of it, a quick look at IMDb revealed that the film had a pretty decent rating so I risked a buck on it. I loved disaster films when I was a kid so I'm surprised this one slipped past my radar back then. After further research I learned that there are several different cuts of this movie available and that the DVD I purchased is in fact the shorter U.S. cut, which is missing almost an hour of footage (mainly featuring the Japanese characters and their back stories). Despite that, I still found "Virus" to be a pretty entertaining (if a bit depressing) film and I'm interested in tracking down a copy of the "true" version of the film.

    Apparently "Virus" was the most expensive film made by a Japanese company at the time of its release (1980), featuring a large cast of both Japanese and Western actors. Unfortunately it never got proper worldwide distribution and was a major financial failure, which is a shame because this was a pretty damn good flick, even in this truncated version. The American cast (who are featured more prominently in the cut I saw) are all genre stalwarts who appeared in a lot of similar disaster films around this same time period -- Glenn Ford as the President of the United States, Robert Vaughn as his Senatorial foil, Henry Silva as a crazed Army general, and so on. I was particularly tickled by the total mis-casting of Chuck "Rifleman" Connors as the captain of a British submarine, because he doesn't even try to affect a British accent. (Perhaps the Japanese producers figured "Screw it, we're just going to dub over him with a Japanese actor anyway.") It does tend to be a bit talky, could've used some more action scenes, and obviously its Cold War era politics are now out of date, but overall "Virus" was a pretty decent little end-of-the-world/apocalypse saga.

    As the movie opens, some cloak-and-dagger types meet in an East German hideaway and exchange a vial of a new biological weapon known as MM-88. The plane carrying the men away from the exchange point crashes in the mountains and the virus is freed, causing a worldwide epidemic of disease that all but wipes out humanity from planet Earth. The only survivors untouched by the disease are a small group of researchers and military types stationed in Antarctica, where the virus cannot spread due to the cold temperatures. These 800-and-change survivors find themselves not only faced with the prospect of repopulating the barren Earth (with only 8 women in the population!), but also preventing yet another catastrophe, because in the final days before the fall of the U.S. Silva's character had armed a missile defense system which pointed all of America's nukes at Russia. An earthquake in the region threatens to cause the defense system to activate, which would then result in a retaliatory strike from a similar defense system on the Russian side. So just as our group of survivors is getting used to the idea of living in this Brave New World, now they have to worry about a follow up apocalypse! An American soldier (Bo Svenson of "Walking Tall" fame) and a Japanese scientist are dispatched to the ruins of Washington, D.C. to de-activate the missile system before all Hell breaks loose on Earth (again). I will not violate the Spoiler Warning rules by telling you how it all turns out, but let's just say it's not the typical Hollywood outcome.

    "All-star cast spectaculars" like these were a dime a dozen in the late 70s and early 80s and a lot of them stunk. "Virus" doesn't. It's a shame that such an ambitious project went all but unnoticed on this side of the ocean at the time of its release. Now that the U.S. version is apparently in the Public Domain and is readily available at an affordable price, it's worth taking a look at a film that had more to say than your average disaster flick. "Virus" is one of my better Dollar Store DVD pickups of late, and one of the few that I'm likely to watch again in the future. Now, where do I find a copy of the "true" original cut of this film? Time to do some searching.
  • This film centers on a virus that is made by the American military and then stolen by the East Germans. On the flight from East Germany to Zurich the plane crashes which releases the virus into the atmosphere resulting in a devastating world-wild contagion. Although incredibly deadly the virus has one major flaw in that it goes dormant in freezing conditions. As a result, the people living in Antarctica are saved from its contamination provided they don't allow any infected people from the outside world in. So over 850 men and 8 women are essentially cut off from everybody else. At any rate, this is a decent post-apocalyptic film with an all-star cast. Unfortunately, except for a very few actors, none of them had the allocated screen time to really establish themselves and develop their characters. This gave the film a "paint-by-numbers" feel which I thought damaged the overall effect. Additionally, from what I understand there is a long version of this movie available which is supposedly much better than the shorter version I happened to view. If that is the case then that probably explains some of the scenes which looked like they had been cut which contributed to the choppy effect I described earlier. In any case, while the 108 minute version is okay it might be better to obtain the longer version if possible--if for no other reason than the fact that the story might flow a bit more smoothly and the actors can showcase their talents a bit more.
  • Having read all the bad reviews this movie has received because of its poor videoquality and editing, I nonetheless bought it yesterday on DVD from a local store in Oslo. I just simply had to buy it in spite of the numerous warnings.

    The reason is that I'm a huge fan of similar movies like The Andromeda Strain, The Satan Bug and the Cassandra Crossing which are all great.

    Regarding the movie itself I was pleasantly surprised. It has good acting, good story and decent production values to boot. All the necessary ingredients for making a compelling movie.

    Sadly this is ruined by an almost unviewable videoprint. It seems to me that the DVD-edition I bought used an old VHS videoprint as the source. The sound is equally bad.

    Finally, some of the shorter prints of the film is plagued by abruptness. The version I acquired runs approx. 108 minutes. You get the feeling you've missed out on something. Nearing the end of the film one of the main characters returns from Washinghton to Antarctica. But we get no explanation as to how he made the journey. Which off course is a prudent question to ask, since in between his departure and arrival, a nuclear holocaust has transpired and several years have passed.

    The longest version runs approx. 150 minutes. Hopefully I'll someday get my hands on that copy. And I urge everyone else to stay clear of the shorter prints and aim for the full 150 minute version instead.

    Kind regards, Chris
  • Warning: Spoilers
    VIRUS is a film I first saw in the early 1980s and didn't think too much of it at the time . Much of my discontent was down to the fact that the ensemble cast just seemed a little too ensemble - there's no real character that the story tries to focus on . Indeed this makes the story feel somewhat mechanical from a narrative point of view . When someone turns up to explain plot turns they disappear quickly never to be seen again . Recently I found out that I had seen the American 108 minute version rather than 156 minute original cut but I can't help thinking perhaps the 156minute cut would make things any more coherent

    Perhaps the problem lies in that post apocalypse fiction isn't best suited to the cinema screen . One can't help thinking its perfect medium is either literature or mini-series . NO BLADE OF GRASS would have benefited greatly from being a 4 hour mini-series rather than a disjointed 90 minute film and breaking up VIRUS in to an episodic series would have helped its story telling too

    From the outset we're treated to some obvious and ridiculous exposition involving the MM88 virus where characters go in to details about things they must surely know or don't need to know . At any second you expect a character to reply " But we're commie agents trying to steal a biological warfare weapon not characters in a film so please STFU " In fact when they get on a plane with the stolen virus they spend so much time talking they don't notice the mountain in front of them thereby setting up an inciting incident at its most painfully obvious . The film that becomes clichéd as people in power - in this case the staff at The White House - watch on television as the world succumbs to " The Italian flu " which is in reality the MM88 . If that's not bad enough an insane General primes America's nuclear deterrent to take out the Soviet Union just in case they decide to launch a nuclear attack

    " But if the world has been wiped out by the Italian flu why would anyone bother priming nuclear weapons ? "

    Yes but that's to do with a later contrived plot turn where survivors in the Antartic are safe from the virus since it can't reproduce in sub zero temperatures . That and the fact it's a Japanese film and we all know how the Japanese feel about nuclear missiles especially when they're being pointed by Americans

    Actually this is the confusing bit . If the survivors are confined to the south pole surely they'll become extinct anyway ? After all it'd be impossible to become self sufficient , you'd be unable to grow crops etc . Perhaps that's why Antartica has no indigenous population ? There's nothing to indicate that the Italian flu will die out so mankind is doomed anyway even without an imminent nuclear strike

    This condemns the film which is a great pity because in parts it's compelling enough for people interested in speculative fiction . The idea of a myngonist relationship is a thing of the distant pass in this new society is touched upon but like so many other ideas in VIRUS is quickly skated over and then forgotten about
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I really liked this movie! I can't believe I just found it and had never heard of it before a few days ago. I have a 50 movie DVD set of "classic chillers," and just pulled this one out at random the other night. Win! I love disaster/post-apocalyptic movies and this one takes the cake. It really has it all. I like to call it a mix of the Andromeda Strain, Mad Max, and On the Beach with some extra oval office drama thrown in. It even reminded me a little of El Topo in some parts. Unfortunately the version I have is the all cut up U.S. version I've been reading about. For whatever reason, several important pieces of plot were cut out, nearly an hour. I was able to watch the full version on Youtube and if you are going to watch it, there's no point in watching any version but the original Japanese directors cut, which runs over 2.5 hrs but is well worth it. I've also heard you can watch this version on archive.org.

    So here is a question for people who have seen this and it is spoilery so is only for those who have seen this: In the original ending, how are our hero and the refugees from Antarctica able to survive the nuclear fallout? As far fetched as it is that he made it from DC to the southern tip of South America on foot, at least that is somewhat plausible. I just can't get past how none of the survivors were affected by fallout. The scientist who invented the vaccine even says that the radiation would have likely killed off the virus, so why not the humans too?
  • Warning: Spoilers
    First of all, let me warn you about a VHS version that is floating around out there that purports to be the full 155 min. cut of this film when in fact it is only 108. It has Glenn Ford and Edward James Olmos on the front of the box and is made in Canada, unfortunately I can't remember the name of the company. The movie itself is pretty damn decent and is fairly bleak. The U.S. Military creates a lethal virus, MM88, for use in germ warfare. Naturally, someone steals it, let's it out of it's box and wham! all hell breaks loose. About 99.9% of the world population bites the big one and a relative handful, 855 men and 8 women are left in the Antarctic. Along comes a British sub with Chuck Connors in command! I guess the Japanese, who made this, think all English speaking people sound alike. Glenn Ford does a nice sweaty turn as the President with Robert Vaughn as his pain in the butt U.S. Senator. Bo Svenson is a Major in either the Army or Air Force because with that long hair, ain't no way he is in the Corp. This is a well made end-of-the-world type picture and it is too bad that is was a flop.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Virus" is a earnest attempt to chronicle an apocalypse, perhaps for cautionary as well as artistic and financial intentions. Unfortunately, the producers made many mistakes which seriously undercut their efforts. The result is a boring, sometimes tedious 2 ½ hour movie about a very important subject, i.e., gene splicing and the possible consequences of misuse as a biological weapon.

    This is doubly a shame, as "Virus" was especially timely, coming at the beginning of the AIDS epidemic. Although the fictional virus functioned in a slightly different manner, had AIDS been an airborne, highly infectious agent, the disastrous consequences could have been exactly the same.

    The first serious mistake was the use of flashback at the beginning of the film. Given that there is very little action in "Virus," the use of flashback undercuts any element of suspense, at least during the first hour.

    The second serious mistake was placing the disaster so near in the future (1982-83). Had the movie been a hit, it would barely have been out of the theaters before it was out of date.

    The third serious mistake was casting actors well known for action films. Casting actors such as Chuck Connors, Bo Swenson, Sonny Chiba and Henry Silva creates anticipation for action which rarely happens. Glenn Ford, Robert Vaughn and, to a lesser extent, George Kennedy are effective in their small, but pivotal roles. However, all three of these stars are as associated with dramas as with action films. The beautiful Olivia Hussey is decorative, but too matter-of-fact for a character who be troubled and conflicted. However, it was a special treat seeing a very young Edward James Olmos; he was effective in his few scenes. Just don't ask him to sing.

    The fourth serious mistake was not hiring a skilled second unit director versed in English. Many of the English-speaking actors overact; and, when there is this much overacting, it's the fault of the director. Given the sensitive manner of the scenes in which the actors spoke Japanese, I'm guessing the director was not well versed in English.

    The fifth serious mistake was the phony looking "Oval Office" set. Since much of the drama takes place in the "Oval Office," great pains should have been taken to create a more realistic atmosphere.

    WARNING: SPOILER

    The sixth serious mistake involved the "ARS". anyone even remotely familiar with US defenses would know Silva would not be able to activate the "ARS" alone. US "Fail Safe" systems always require two individuals and an activation code. This would have been a very simple fix, and the mistake is compounded by allowing Silva to cackle like a villain in a bad melodrama.

    If the first two hours of "Virus" were simply boring, the last 30 minutes is downright tedious, despite a whole 7 minutes of mild action, the first since the first half hour. When a film this dull runs over two hours, all the earlier irritants become even more noticeable. Everything from the sappy music to Chuck Connors' terrible British accent and Bo Svenson's "Buford Pusser" haircut brings great irritation. Worse, the last 30 minutes is laughably absurd, asking us to believe an "above top secret" weapons control center can be breached as easily as an office building. Such a command center would have its own air supply and decontamination center, making it as safe as Connors' nuclear submarine. By the way, hasn't anyone ever heard of HAZMAT suits? After all, this movie was made nearly ten years after "The Andromeda Strain." However, the most laughably absurd element is expecting us to believe the Japanese scientist could escape on foot from "ground zero" of an all-out nuclear war and find, several thousand miles later, a colony of two dozen or so people, when he hasn't a clue where they are going to settle.

    END OF SPOILER

    Keep in mind, the dreadful "Virus" cost nearly as much as "The Empire Strikes Back," and all the producers have to show for the effort is some beautiful photography. "Virus" is just one more piece of evidence than good intentions don't necessarily make good movies. I give "Virus" a "3".
  • I have always loved this movie since I first saw it in the eighties but have been stuck with the shorter (105 or 115 minute)American versions. I finally found a full, 156 minute, version last year and it really makes a difference. As is the case with most Japanese movies edited for America, from Gojira to the present, they have a tendency to take out the poignant parts and edit so that some of the original plot points are completely lost. Here you gain more scenes at the Japanese base camp with them dealing with the loss of their families back home and a really powerful scene when they contact a young American boy by short-wave that has lost his parents. There are also more scenery-chewing scenes with some of the leads, especially with Henry Silva going way over the top. If you like the movie, this version is definitely worth looking for.
  • The little known, seldom heard of film known here as 'Virus' hit the UK shores on DVD in my local supermarket bargain bin for the grand total of three quid.

    I took a chance and bought it…..

    Actually this is surprisingly a very good story with an impressive cast list that must have been desperate for the cash although Chuck Connors as a British Royal Navy Captain does take a bit of getting used to! The story line is a well thought out scenario carefully planned and I am wondering what extra interest lurked in the reportedly missing 40 or so minutes of the full Japanese edit.

    It was a pity therefore that this effectively straight to video effort was let down by some really bad editing, poor picture quality, duff soundtrack, too many stock images of icebergs and cities and an occasional bit of duff dialogue.

    It does however keep running along nicely and unlike many examples of this genre, avoids getting bogged down in unnecessary scenes or throwaway dialogue with the possible exception of the rather bizarre ending.

    With a bit of rewriting, some careful cast choices and a decent budget as well as modern effects, this excellent story could be remade to a standard of excellence that would put many of the big budget CGI laden super thrillers that seem to clog up cinemas these days to shame.

    Now, is there a movie mogul prepared to take the gamble and put his cash on the line to give this story the proper treatment it deserves?
  • Warning: Spoilers
    There were a few interesting aspects, especially for the film's era. The scope was pretty (overly?) large - even if a lot happens off-stage. However, there were some pretty horrible bits of acting as well. PLENTY of material for the MST3K guys. For a while I kept thinking it was FAIL-SAFE but done as a subplot on the Love Boat.

    I especially love the 8 women to 600 men left in the polar research station who get RIGHT to the obvious point. As morally distasteful as it is ladies, we have a planet to repopulate and lots of men with needs...

    Short straw gets George Kennedy.
  • I saw the original one in cinema when it first came out in 1980 in Japan. Great adaptation of an original novel by Sakyo Komatsu. It was an epic of more than two hours, which shook my youthful soul with the power of love.

    I was flabbergasted by how this epic was mutilated when I saw it again in video in USA. The one you can see in USA has no resemblance to the original version, where, I recall, much longer portion of the film was spent describing "the walk". Also all the episodes in Japan were omitted, so most of the Japanese characters in Antarctica made no sense. In a nutshell, the "American" version only talks about American people, so there is really only half the story left in the film. If you can get the original version, it is a very emotional film, 8/10. The "American" version is not worth anything, 4/10.
  • The best disaster movie you will never see. If you can get the Japanese cut, it has almost an extra hour, which I imagine probably gave a lot more depth to the film, just a guess. The American version I did get my hands on was pretty good on it's own....(read more) This is not really a movie about saving the world so much as surviving the numerous apocalypses the world can throw at you, even after the entire world population dies at the hands of a super virus, those surviving in Artic research stations(the virus cannot survive the cold) some 8880 men and 8 women(the scene where the women address how 1 on 1 "relationships" are going to be impossible, is one of the most genuine, poignant, and unique in the film, the Apocalypse doesn't hit home till you realize there's 8000 horny scientists, crawling over each other to play Adam and eve, those not-if-you-were- the-last-man-on-earth scenarios horribly reversed.), still have to deal with the fact that both the Russian and American automatic nuclear missile systems are still in operation, and a coming earthquake is liable to force them to launch, one of which is pointed at the Antartic research station. So two men on foot, one Japanese and one American take a trip to DC, to turn off the machine. A lot of the save the world stuff takes place in the last 20 minutes, the rest is all death and survival.

    This was at the time of it's release the most expensive Japanese film ever made, and it shows, as we get scenes from Germany, Japan, America, and yes the Antartic, real submarines too. If you sat through "Outbreak", "The Day After Tomorrow", and many of the now numerous end of the world films, this wont be anything too new, there are some scenes which are undeniably cheesy(the "walk" at the end).

    However, because I've got a U.S. cut, and U.S. cuts, as a rule of thumb, are generally dumbed down and streamlined, sad but true. So I don't know how to give an accurate review, this movie as it is at the 108 minutes I saw it, was decent with a fair serving of 80's cheese, I have a feeling though with a little more time, this might have felt as epic and grand as it intimates in it's best moments. "Virus" is also a terrible title for this film as well, which has little to do with virus', or bacteriology, it's a good global destruction movie, "The End" is a much better fitting moniker. Director would go on to later success with "Battle Royale".

    Note: I picked this movie up because it get's referenced a lot in Junot Diaz's "The Brief And Wonderous Life Of Oscar Wao" as the title characters favorite film, and in the right context I can see why.
  • In this vision of the early 80's apocalypse films, the U.S. and Japanese co-produced an ambitious film called Virus. It was 1980, and it ran right around the time, Threads (1981) and the Day After (1983)came out. The scenario starts with a submarine surfacing following the reconnaissance of a drone looking for survivors in Paris in the aftermath of terrible plague. Most of the still living international personnel are safe in Antarctica, and are trying to cope with this inevitable Holocaust that ravages most of the world from Spring 83 to November.

    In flashbacks, we see how a bio-weapon called MM-88 is passed on in a weapons deal in E.Germany, but in the midst of this transfer parties are slain. Around the same time, President Richardson(Glenn Ford) asserts the peace process with a Soviet Accord in 82', much to the chagrin of the military establishment, which is anxious to get funding for the ARS (automatic response system) which would give them the "Arms advantage necessary to contain the Soviets".

    An accident takes place while the weapon is being flown over a mountainous region, accidentally releasing the genetically engineered super virus (Italian Flu) that rages through country after country. Just when things couldn't get any worse, a "fail-safe" retaliatory strike will be accidentally set off when an impending sea quake of about 8-9.0 hits the sea (which will be interpreted as a nuclear blast by the ARS system)

    It had the usual disturbing images....the burning of piles of bodies, and the moral dilemmas of repopulating the world. The melancholy music score provides ambiance to the somber proceedings. The continuity is a little stilted because the Japanese version has some events from Japan's point of view added in. Bo Swenson is a hoot in surly "Walking Tall" mode through the film. Ford provides a embattled, stern but rational President, while Henry Silva hams it up as the "military lunatic" on the fringe. The location shots in what looks like Antarctica was pretty good. The production looked top-notch for its time. A pretty good apocalypse film, if you ignore the huge gap in logic towards the end. 5.7 out of 10
  • It was 17 years ago (1983) that I watched this movie as a new release in Guadalajara, Mexico. I was 15 years old and I still remember it well. That is how much it moved me.

    What if a man made military virus killed off the world except for the coldest place on Mother Earth? What if (at the height of the Cold War) Cold War enemies had to team up to survive? What if the few hundred men and women left in the world had to procreate mankind? Further (and what makes me remember this movie), how do they handle a new threat to their lives?

    I strongly recommend this movie.
  • No, this isn't the one with Jamie Lee Curtis. VIRUS (1980) does illustrate the effects of a global catastrophe in frightening levels, yet despite the big budget of a Japanese movie, it lacks the kind of rage that we must strongly accept. The production values are still the same as with these crusty old late-night movies, but there is a premise to be understood here. We first look at the horrifying images of worldwide cities under panic and frustration over "germ warfare", and how the governments try to deal with the problem quickly. But until reaching halfway, the movie falters as the point of interest suddenly becomes lost. The big name cast, including an early entry by Edward James Olmos, is more confusing than wasted. As an alternative to movies like TESTAMENT, it is true about how human life is a best-kept thing to behold. VIRUS dramatically sets the stage for possible future calamities. A better script would help, though.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    While this really must have either caused shock in 1980 for its horrific view of what we now call a pandemic or scales of laughter for its over-the-top dramatization of the end of civilized society, it has a bit of an impact 40 years later with the coincidences it has in common with today. Someone refers to the outbreak of a deadly virus as "that Italian disease" as to where the broken vile of the virus originated from. A plane crash has it spreading over Germany and ultimately it makes its way across the globe. The effects are disastrous and the symptoms unbearable to watch, even in fiction. At least they had a fictional president (Glenn Ford) who was doing something about it, and to watch the governments of the world collapse underneath the threat of this is jaw dropping. Veteran Ford allows himself to be made up to look beyond haggard, like a walking corpse suffering in an indescribable agony that adds to the impact of his performance.

    The only place where the virus cannot cause any harm is where the temperatures drop below freezing, and for the variety of cultures locked together in a huge station in the South Pole, it's quite a difficult task for everyone to try to get along. The limited number of women among a ton of men results in hideous acts of sexual perversion like none in recorded history, and the looks on the faces of these women as they face a horrible future is shocking and tear enducing. But for commander George Kennedy, it's amazing that anybody puts up with him the way he bellows.

    The real plotline after the end of society is made clear comes from the physical impact of the pandemic, both natural and manmade which includes an earthquake and the launching of nuclear missiles. When British submarine commander Chuck Conners arrives in the completely abandoned United States capitol, he finds Washington D.C. to be a shell of itself. And then there's the aftermath of that as the lack of supplies causes more damage.

    This Japanese movie has moments of greatness that are perhaps able to flow better in the 2 1/2 version which would give more back story and more of a detailed conclusion. There's a very pretty theme song that opens and closes the film, the version I saw being just under two hours.

    A very funny scene that is disturbing in many ways has Conners (sans any attempt to sound English) continuously pushing and punching the Japanese scientist insisting that he go to Washington DC with him and jumping all over him even after being smacked down, over and over, played a bit like a Three Stooges fight. I found myself engrossed in this after the initial scenes of society's fall, having had this in my collection for years and passing by. The wait was worth it, not knowing how much darker this is than what history is bringing us in the present.
  • Paul-b-117 August 2006
    My copy of this movie came as part of one of those "15 DVDs for £10" packs, and stood alongside some of the worst "straight to Video" films ever made.

    As other reviewers have commented, the worst aspect of this DVD is the copy quality - it looks as though someone has hired a somewhat tired 8mm copy of the movie, projected it on to the wall of their bedroom and video'ed the result on an ageing camcorder.

    I suspect that I may have the US version (I wasn't aware that the Japanese version was any different), as the last section ("the walk" as others have described it) seemed incredibly corny and the whole film could have stood up without it. Having now learnt that substantial chunks were removed from the film I can perhaps understand why this section only appeared to be tacked on the end.

    Other than these two grumbles I was very impressed; the film not only seems a remarkably powerful one but also spookily prophetic. You are certainly left with a chilling insight as to what could have happened if "worst-case" scenarios relating to bird flu had been realised.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I can only assume that other commentators saw a different take from the one now serving as my coffee-coaster.

    This movie is absolutely lamentable. Even now, I can still hardly believe how bad it really is. Created in Japan, it lacks any of the shocking or subtle nuances that we in the west take for granted. By any standard: script, photography, sound-effects, lighting, directing, set-pieces, dubbing; in any aspect of theatrical evaluation it is a disaster, a failed, amateurish disaster.

    Quite a collection of ageing Hollywood movie stalwarts generously put their reputations on the line in the name of international co-operation. Well; they made a mistake. I hope they got paid for their trouble. Or maybe they did it for charity; it certainly looks that way.

    The copy I bought was called 'The Director's Cut'. Believe me; the only cut he should have made was to his abdomen when he fell on his sword. If there are other variations, go for the one that is blank.

    For the uninitiated: a virus is traded by dubious individuals. They carry it in a light plane. The plane crashes, virus is released. It's an end-of-civilisation-as-we-know-it situation. To the everlasting relief of rational viewers, everyone begins to peg-out. They just don't do it quick enough. A small mixed group finish up ekeing-out an existence in some remote research station or other. There are not enough females to go round, etc.

    Don't expect any pocket philosophy. Don't expect any insightful commentary. Don't expect anything expect poor lighting, fractured continuity, amateurish dubbing, crap dialogue, etc, etc, etc. It seems rather telling that the only other commentator who levies the criticism it deserves, happens to be Japanese. He honourably apologises on behalf of his nation (and quite right, too). Perhaps everyone else is being diplomatically polite.

    I have awarded one star for the most preposterously hammy death - Robert Vaughan's, I think (oh-yes, he's in it) - ever seen on cinema. It could have come straight out of pantomime.

    This is my nomination for 'Worst Movie Ever Made'. Watch it for that reason only. But be warned; you might wish you'd caught the virus instead.

    Fukkatsu No Hi? I couldn't have put it better myself.
  • What's not to love about VIRUS? I bought the DVD (which supposedly features the 'director's cut') and discovered that I'd got the truncated American version, sighed and sat down to watch it anyway. For the next two hours I was caught up in an epic, world-wide story that never stalled or felt unconvincing for a second. This is a matter-of-fact tale of the apocalypse, showing what would really happen if a killer virus was unleashed upon the world's unsuspecting population.

    The Japanese production values are top notch and in particular the post-apocalypse sequences are expertly staged: a desolate world indeed is built up after the calamity that unfolds. Following in the best 'disaster film' traditions, an all-star American cast delivers the goods, from a particularly affecting Glenn Ford as the doomed president to Robert Vaughn as his trustworthy adviser and Henry Silva as a war-mongering general. Add in Olivia Hussey, George Kennedy, Edward James Olmos, tough guy Bo Svenson and even a cameoing Sonny Chiba and you have pretty much the movie-lover's dream cast.

    Of course, given that this is in reality a Japanese film, the acting honours really go to Masao Kusakari, playing an ordinary-guy scientist who undergoes tremendous ordeals and feats of bravery by the time the film ends. Kusakari is the film's real hero and he's never less than excellent. I enjoyed the way this movie explores the real-life consequences of such catastrophic events, such as what happens when eight women are shared between hundreds of men, and at some point I'll track down the full uncut version, which I suspect will be even better
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Virus" and "The day after" are two of the eighties apocalyptic movies that had a point of melancholy. Main characters have no political focus, and mass destruction features are far away from the actual interests of people, but people die because of these features. At all, no one earns anything with the annihilation of people.

    In the other side, "Virus" has scenes that attempt to be quite profound. Are actually so profound? I'm not sure.

    However, I assume there is a memorable conversation in the movie. The matter is that the conversation is in Japanese. Could anyone offer us an English (or Spanish) translation of the full conversation in the deserted church? At the end of the movie, the main character comes in a church (presumed in South America) and has a mute conversation (subtitled in Japanese) with a Christ in a dropped cross, and with two corpses. I have down loaded the 153 minutes version (basically English spoken) and cannot understand the Japanese subtitles of that conversation. Almost 25 years ago, I watched this movie at my home TV, in a Beta video case. I enjoyed extremely and remember that conversation perhaps one the best moments of the story, with the very beginning (February 1982, snowy scene with the professor who stoled the MM88). 25 years ago, in the Beta edition at my home, I listened to the Spanish translation (not a mute, but a spoken conversation), and perhaps with English subtitles. I loved that scene.
  • Based on other reviewer comments, I have probably not seen this film in its entirety. That is indeed unfortunate, as it does have some aspects which may have made it a pretty decent film. Based on a Japanese novel, the story tells about the evolution of a virus that mimics everything and anything and has the ability to multiply at astounding rates. This virus, in the opening scene, is lost in mountains of snow waiting for the thaw that unleashes it on the world. Soon the world's populations begin to die with sundry sicknesses(Italian Flu I believe being the most predominant). Whilst all this chaos is going on, we get to see the reactions of the president, Glenn Ford, his secretaries, notably Robert Vaughn, and his military advisers, Henry Silva really carved thickly. This section of the film is done reasonably well, but the budget strains here and there. The script is also way too taxed. An epic is needed and a regular film is delivered. The second half of the film detours to the only place that can hide from the germs - Antartica, where all the countries representatives have convened and set up house. Now, they must decide to divide up eight women with 800 men. Hmmm, I'm not to keen at math but I know the odds there are pretty bad. They deal with other problems and we soon get to know several of the people involved: a Norwegian woman(inexplicably played by Olivia Hussey), a Japanese scientist, head of it all - George Kennedy, an Argentinian representative - Edward J. Olmos, Chuck Connors playing a member of Her Majesty's Navy(Yeah right!), and Bo Swenson as a hard-drinking, two-fisted American. None of the roles is really developed, and to make matters worse, a romance of sorts is thrown in to make sure the viewer is really confused. Is Virus(or whatever title you have seen it under) any good? Yes, it has some good to it. I liked the pace of the film. Much of the story was very interesting. But there are many detractors at least for me. None of the acting is very convincing despite having such an established cast. Ford is pretty good in his role, but Connors is just ridiculous as a British naval man. Henry Silva's wooden histrionics also are just too much. As I alluded to earlier, the scope and breadth of the film is not conducive to a feature-length film. This would have been great as a mini-series broken down into several evenings. Instead, too much is crammed into too short a period and obvious breaks occur. And I haven't even gotten to the most ridiculous aspect of the film which is the ending? It defies even the logic that the film had been using. Interesting concept but flawed execution.
  • I just purchased a used copy of the Sonny Chilba Action Pack which includes the uncut Japanese 156m version of the film. By far the best transfer of the film to a media that I have seen thus far. This version is extremely better than the edited US version. Every bit worth the money spent to acquire it. Looks like it is presented in 1:1.85 aspect and not grainy. The cut Japanese scenes bring a better viewing experience to fans of this film like me. There are English subtitles where needed. The scene that prompted me to post this on here was a scene where the Japanese Antarctic team get a radio signal from a 5 year old American child unable to operate a radio correctly. VIRUS is one of my favorite movies about the end of the world.
  • Not a bad movie. A bit lackluster at points performance-wise, but still, rather solid performances with a rather believable storyline. Masao Kusakari & Bo Swenson are among the best in the show with solid performances all around. The one draw back, all movies like this in the early eighties have the same tired old clichéd characters. If you're an aficionado of such movies as I am, you'll understand exactly what I mean. (ie. The Towering Inferno, The Swarm, The Posiedon Adventure, etc. etc. etc. just not as big of a blockbuster style film as these were). That was my only grievance. The ending was excellent. So was the beginning and ending music. They worked well for this movie. Enjoy!!
  • graham-harvey20 November 2021
    A British submarine captained by an American with no explanation!

    A worldwide pandemic with a disease so virulent that all life ceases except those far down in Antarctica. And yet no one wears a facemask when dealing with the sick! They had figured that out in 1919 & maybe earlier... This film is ham class.
An error has occured. Please try again.