Alan Dershowitz provided legal input on this film, and it is very much true that innocent bystanders have far fewer rights than actual criminal suspects, as caterer Kathryn Beck finds to her ultimate destruction. A theme which is not explicitly explored, but which certainly ought to have been more acknowledged in reviews, is the double standard for men and women regarding their personal lives. The fact that Kathryn took a man she had only just met at party to her home afterward is an automatic assumption that she is a bad woman, ergo, she is not entitled to any presumption of innocence, not only by the media types who make her life unbearable, but even by the police, who also treat her without any dignity in the hopes that she will lead them to her new friend, whom they believe is actually an old friend, a suspected terrorist, with whom she must be in cahoots. As it happens, they find him on their own, and he offers no resistance. When he is able to produce a key showing that he cannot be accused of breaking and entering, his rights are quite secure; he is entitled to a defense and an assumption of innocence. He is actually troubled by Kathryn's dilemma, having contacted her while he was still free, and he tries to convince the authorities that she was not part of anything that he is accused of. He has more integrity, actually, than either the media or the police, and his guilt or innocence (is he a victim of excessive FBI and local police surveillance? Such things have happened, and continue to happen, as government agencies are weaponized against perceived "enemies") is still not established as the film ends with the emotionally traumatized Kathryn killing her nemesis from the media. Marlo Thomas and Kris Kristofferson both give superb performances, in particular Kristofferson's highly nuanced performance as a handsome charmer who may or may not be a very dangerous man.