User Reviews (290)

Add a Review

  • I was 19 when I saw AFTER HOURS in 1985. Back then, I thought it was funny as hell. But as a 54-year-old man, I can appreciate it even more.

    In my 3.5 decades between my viewings, I've been to New York City many times, read Henry Miller, become familiar with the doo-wop songs on the barroom's jukebox, and (unfortunately) dated women who reminded me entirely too much of Marcy, Julie, and Gail. On the other hand: to date, I've been lucky enough to never be stalked by a vigilante lynch mob (unless you count Facebook). And the Mister Softee truck was a riotous touch!

    I agree with the reviewers who call AFTER HOURS the most underrated Scorsese film. It features elements of what already him a great director, as well as glimpses into the future career of this master filmmaker.
  • Out of all the Scorsese films - I would have to admit this ranks in the top five. After Hours draws you into it's dark and surreal world with fantastical wonder. The characters are all interesting, the acting superb - especially Griffin Dunne - and the pacing is great.

    It was made in 1985, and I can already see the techniques Scorsese used in Goodfellas - and the quick editing. It is directed and edited really well. So if you were a fan of Scorsese's frantic camera work in Goodfellas and Casino, this film is for you.

    It really does put you on edge - as a viewer, you really want Dunne's character to get back home - but everything possible that could happen to him - happens. This is not just a evocation of soHo in the early 80's - it is a deeply black comedy. All the rules go out the window for Dunne's character, because after all it is after hours.

    Scorsese really is the best living director at the moment - so do yourself a favour and watch this movie - it's fantastic.
  • This wasn't a big hit when it came out, but it should have been. Martin Scorsese is a master of creating atmosphere and exploring a specific setting, and he has proved that in movies like Taxi Driver and Gangs of New York. In this film he brings the SoHo of the early to mid 1980s to life in brilliant and surreal fashion. Griffin Dunne is a great Every Man character. You like him from the very first scene and you follow his adventures with excitement and dread. The tension in this film is also intense, and that is amazing for a light hearted comedy. I am always surprised to hear that people have not seen this movie, or that people don't like this movie. I urge all Scorsese fans to see it. It's one of his best, even though many critics did not like it when it came out. It's a cult hit, but it deserves to be more than that too. It's a masterpiece.
  • 'After Hours' is a really dark, nightmarish comedy and is one of Martin Scorsese's most enjoyable films. Griffin Dunne is perfection as the computer operator who meets lovely but ditsy Rosanna Arquette in a diner and arranges to meet her late one night. His journey to downtown New York goes hideously wrong when he loses his taxi fare and spends the rest of the evening trying to get home. Along the way we meet feisty Linda Fiorentino, whimsical Verna Bloom, Gorgeous but hysterical Teri Garr and Dusty Springfield look alike Catherine O'Hara. We also get to witness suicide, murder, robbery and vigilante mobs in this tale of big city madness. The camera-work is stupendous and features every trick in the book. There is much to admire in this film and thankfully it now has a DVD release with a commentary by the Director and star.
  • Martin Scorsese has always been a master of kinetic filmmaking but After Hours is really where he starts cranking up the energy even more. This movie is simply alive in a way that most movies aren't. Everyone in it has a story to tell and we're ready to hear them all.

    From the cocktail waitress who seems stuck in the 1960s to the ice cream truck driver who wears a rape whistle to the stoic bouncer outside the punk bar and of course the sculptor who lives under the bar and has no scruples about using live subjects, there are so many weirdos in this film it's fantastic.

    I've seen plenty of New York movie but I'm not sure I've ever seen any make the city feel so oppressively large. There's a great sense of space in this film and it genuinely feels hopeless for Paul to try to get home, which could sound like a dumb premise for a movie until you see it handled here. The journey is downright epic and Scorsese uses every visual technique he learned in school to keep the tempo cruising through this long trip.

    I wasn't bored for a second at any point during After Hours and you won't be either. This film is alive and Thelma Schoonmaker does maybe the best work of her great career at an editing bay. She should've gotten an Oscar nomination. This film is simply a master class in pacing.
  • This is one of Scorsese's lesser known films which is a travesty. Griffin Dunne plays a cubicle working blue collar- the type that was so rampant in the mid 80s, who accidently experiences a series of bizarre misadventures in New York City. This is not typical Scorsese fare and one reason it works is because of the legendary filmmaker's deft skills- the atmosphere is amazing as is the pacing of the film. The protagonist is relatable in an everyman lost and confused kind of way. Like a bad dream or surreal experience After Hours is one hell of a ride. As stated in the opening line of this review- it is a travesty that more people aren't aware of this film.
  • I tried very hard to like "After Hours," Martin Scorsese's surrealist head trip about a straight-laced word processor (Griffin Dunne) who ventures off into the SoHo night and gets trapped inside a frustrating nightmare. It's an interesting premise for a film -- what goes on out there in the nocturnal world while the rest of us are fast asleep? But I couldn't help but feel that the film was trying too hard, like its creators were intentionally setting out to make something that would eventually end up as a cult classic. That it did doesn't make the movie any better. The best cult classics are those that become so naturally, not those that are manufactured to be so.

    Griffin Dunne is on screen nearly constantly, and he does well with his role, gradually working himself up to a nearly hysterical pitch of frustration in his failed attempts to get back to the safety of his home. The supporting cast is peopled with recognizable faces in cameos: Teri Garr, Catherine O'Hara, Cheech Marin, Rosanna Arquette. But no one is really playing a character, and no one really gets much to work with. I wasn't bothered by the implausibility of the film; implausibility is the film's point. But I did get somewhat bored by the arbitrary plot twists, and the fact that I couldn't connect with anyone in the film, not even Dunne, whose character is vaguely unlikable.

    I did like the film's ending, though. It nicely captures that feeling of waking from an unsettling dream into the familiar world that you know and recognize.

    Grade: B
  • I saw this when this first came out about 19 (!) years ago, and it became my favorite movie of 1985, and probably my favorite Scorsese film ("Goodfellas" is right there with it). However it always seemed that I was the only one who felt that way. It was no sensation at the box office (even by art film standards), it was ignored by all the awards as far as I remember, and no DVD release.

    Until now. First off, I am happy to report that the new DVD release looks and sounds great. It feels like the film came out last year.

    Now, years down the road, you really appreciate how accomplished "After Hours" is in the wake of 100s of inferior indie releases that ape the urban paranoia and "downtown" sensibility that this seems to effortlessly catch. The film is pitch perfect:you sense a filmmaker in complete command, but the film is always off balance (as intended). The plot seems to flow randomly and the movie always defies your expectations, yet it's as tightly assembled as a jigsaw puzzle.

    It's easy to catch the Scorsese style of shooting and editing, really starting to roll here (before taking off in "The Color of Money" and "Goodfellas"), as the engine of the movie. You have to remind yourself that every other director was not trying to make movies this way at this point (1985), and that you are watching the inventor, not just the best practitioner.

    But don't overlook the cast's contributions. Perfectly cast down to the smallest roles (yes, I mean you Dick Miller), few things are more enjoyable than watching an able cast take the ball and run with it. Obviously having a blast, they not only jump into their parts, but they have no hesitation at being unlikable and annoying. Particularly Griffin Dunne, the perfect Everyman, who becomes more and more of a jerk as the night wears on.
  • Poor Paul Hackett. A chance meeting with a woman in a diner leads him later to taxi some distance to where she is staying. Once there he realizes that things are not going well and he wants out, but he just can't extricate himself from the complexity of circumstances that prevent his finding his way back home.

    I found this film to be one of the most artificially constructed and highly stylized I have seen. I reacted to it more as one long anxiety dream than as comedy, although in a different context, like Charlie Chaplin moving from one frustration to another, I can see the comedic potential. Perhaps on second viewing I would be more receptive to the comedy rather than the anxiety.

    Paul's interactions with the people he encounters on his nighttime odyssey are all, well, rather weird. So weird in fact that none of them is quite believable. But, I suppose they are no more than exaggerated riffs on personality types that are more familiar, at least in New York.

    An intriguing aspect of the film is that, while recognizing it as pure artifice, I was sucked into the story. I suppose that is testament to Scorsese's skill as a filmmaker.
  • petra_ste11 November 2013
    Warning: Spoilers
    Scorsese's funniest movie, this dark comedy follows meek New Yorker Paul (a brilliant Griffin Dunne) as he ventures for a night outside his safety zone in an unknown neighborhood to a date with a cute young woman (Rosanna Arquette) he barely knows. Soon enough events take a dangerous turn: his date is a creepy disaster, he meets increasingly weird individuals, an angry mob mistakes him for a criminal and chases him through the streets as he desperately tries to go home.

    The book Paul reads enraptured at the beginning is Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer, a picaresque novel full of seedy sexual encounters and drunken escapades - that's obviously what Paul was dreaming of, but expectations clash with a dangerous reality he isn't prepared for. Scorsese, Dunne and writer Minion successfully play it for laughs, but Paul's nocturnal adventure has the uncanny quality of a nightmare - it's no coincidence a scene with a nightclub bouncer mirrors Kafka's short story Before The Law. Dunne even kind of looks like a yuppie version of the Czech author.

    The ending is a little gem. Through the use of religious imagery - Paul's "resurrection" after getting out of the statue, the bells, the great gate... - the movie ironically implies that Paul, after his disastrous attempt at a new life - which turned out to be a hellish experience - returns to his own personal heaven and benevolent "god", his computer in a pleasantly dull office. Josef K actually finds salvation in bureaucracy this time.

    8,5/10
  • 'After Hours' is a minor Scorcese film, the story of a man who heads out one night on a hot date with a virtual stranger. But he loses his money, the girl turns out to be downright odd and everything soon runs totally out of control. It's a nice conceit, but the plot feels contrived and stretched, while the film is never consistently funny: in fact, it feels more amateurish than any of Scorcese's other works. Arguably, this sort of concept works better when there's a conspiracy involved, as in Fincher's 'The Game': otherwise, the hapless hero is left a victim of outrageously bad luck and his own stupidity. There are entertaining moments, but compared with 'Raging Bull' and 'The King of Comedy', which Scorcese also made around this time, it makes a very poor cousin.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    N.B. Spoilers within.

    This is an underrated, sublimely realized black comedy by the (at the time) struggling Scorcese. There is a perfect balance here between the big picture—-uptown white-collar insurance guy out of his league in night-time bohemian SoHo—-and infinite numbers of details within. Scorcese has taken a great script by Joseph Minion and crafted a piece of comedy, suspense, self-exploration, plenty of twists, and interpersonal discovery. Our lead, Paul Hackett (the subtle and brilliant Griffin Dunne) is the most hapless "hero" to grace the screen in a long time. Whatever can go wrong does go wrong. As Paul steps into the next venture, there is no telling what will come of it. The script keeps the viewer constantly on edge and clueless as to what to expect next. Paranoia becomes rampant.

    The music that frames the picture—-a youthful symphony by Mozart—-defines the outwardly tidy guidelines of Paul's world (number crunching and computer interfacing). But even the small glimpse we get of that world says that all is not right. The trainee whom Paul is overseeing (a small part for Bronson Pinchot—-see "True Romance") hates the job and wants out of it. Then there is that telling moment where Paul looks around him and watches everything flow by in its idiosyncratic motion. The quick vision is both sexy and unsettling. He's having a momentary insight, but exactly into what? Is his whole life here empty and pointless? Is he bored out of his mind? Scorcese never lets us know for sure. But then Paul meets Marcy in the diner and the fun begins.

    We can't know if Murphy's Law applies to Paul all the time, but it certainly does on this fateful night. There is a flat-out poetic shot of Paul's sole 20-dollar bill floating from the cab into oblivion, and this is just the beginning. This brings up my first observation, though, on Scorcese: his stunning and beautiful camera work. It flows, it jumps, it's liquid, now it interrupts jarringly. The whole effort contributes to the anxious nature of the story and of how Paul never feels completely grounded while he's out of his territory.

    The multitudes of characters that Paul meets are all convoluted stories unto themselves. Kiki (a smoking-hot Linda Fiorentino—-where has she gone?), Marcy's artist roommate, and the ultimate 80s bohemian; her leather-bound friend Horst (a menacing Will Patton); the "nice" waitress (Teri Garr) with more baggage than Paul can handle; Gail (the hilarious Catherine O'Hara) who will turn on Paul in a big way; Tom the bartender (John Heard), himself a ticking time-bomb; Cheech and Chong, industrious through the long night, and the solution to who the bad SoHo burglars are; but especially there's Marcy (the luscious Rosanna Arquette). She is sweet, good-hearted, ditsy, but full of dark secrets. A lot of these are spilled, others only suggested. The rape story, for example...hard to understand until you've seen it, but it's full of comedy. Arquette plays Marcy just right, a girl who is just short of being completely unhinged, but who still stumbles ahead smoothly and confidently if not a good bit clueless-ly. This is one unique character. Her suicide contributes much to Paul's emotional weight—-how exactly did he contribute to it?—-and also to the comedy's being so black.

    "After Hours" occupies an era that is pre-ATMs and cell phones, but there are Checker cabs, subway tokens, gritty artists' lofts, and rotary phones. Punk is king. The picture strikes me as being linear, yes, but also kaleidoscopic: Paul meets and re-meets the same characters throughout, but each time this happens, his circumstances have taken a new turn. The story is also full of strange details that help knit the whole together. An example: the subject of burns and scars. There is this brief focus on burns and burn treatments. Marcy's cream, her trip to the drugstore to get it, the book of gruesome pictures that Paul can't keep himself from...then Marcy floats back in (he slams the book shut) and what is she holding? A candle with a huge flame! Ha! It's details like these that make the movie feel so integrated. (Even Kiki tells Paul she has "horrible, ugly scars.") Finally, and this part is truly sick, once Marcy is dead under the sheet, Paul can't help but inspect her body for those suspected burn marks. Ugh…

    I have to mention the last of Paul's meetings, when there is absolutely nowhere else to turn: June, at the club (Verna Bloom), seems to be the only person who truly understands his predicament and who helps to finally "rescue" him, but her means are highly suspicious. Is she also trying to kill him? What a stroke. One of the key themes of the flick is that everyone Paul encounters is for the moment his savior, but who soon leads him into more trouble than he already has. It is Paul/Upper East Side/trying-his-best versus the nighttime/living-on-the-fly/Downtown mentality, and "After Hours" places the two mindsets at opposite ends of the universe.

    Scorcese, temporarily abandoning the beleaguered "Last Temptation," hit the mark spot-on with this wonderful comedy. In the process he proved his love for the medium, not to mention loving all the memorable characters that inhabit the wacky, unpredictable story. I also think this is Griffin Dunne's pinnacle: he perfectly inhabits a role where everything is falling apart around him but where he hangs on and finds something inside that keeps plugging on until the sun rises again. Polished, inspired, funny, and disturbing film making. Highly recommended.
  • Wow, this is another strange movie. Maybe "bizarre" are even "weird" would be better descriptions. Since it's a favorite of national critics, you know it's not a movie that most normal people are going to like.

    I watched this movie twice, and found it to be one of those films that is very interesting the first time around, but tiresome and almost stupid on the second look. Some movies are like that, mainly the ones which are wacky and the viewer is shocked at what he's seeing. When the shock wears off, it isn't so entertaining. That was case here. On the first look, it kept my attention because I was wondering what crazy thing was going to happen next. It's hard to explain this film because its a combination of genres and an attempt at black humor. I say "attempt" because on the second viewing, I didn't find it very funny. Be warned, too, on the first viewing: the first 25 minutes are slow, and then it picks up, so stick with it.
  • Director Martin Scorsese doing coldly-cutting comedy--sort of like a prankster with a joy-buzzer that really zaps you. The effect is both rude and sadistic...yet some may find irony in this low-ball humor. Luckless Griffin Dunne chances to meet cute flake Rosanna Arquette one night in New York City, but a follow-up date is fraught with calamities, and characters apparently just sprung from a nuthouse. The attractive supporting performers (including Teri Garr, Linda Fiorentino, John Heard, Thomas Chong and Cheech Marin) are not used to balance out the craziness in the material with their star-personas; everyone on-screen is just a little bit battier than the ones who came before, and once you've become attuned to the movie's intentionally-bumpy rhythm (the cinematic equivalent of Bumper Cars), the rest of the picture can be a very funny lark. However, with so many ciphers on display, and absolutely no mercy shown from our director, I was too aware of the material as "gag comedy". It's never less than well-done, and has an amazing full-circle finish, but there's nothing substantial about "After Hours". All the requisite Scorsese style is wasted, really, on piffle. ** from ****
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I was living in Los Angeles in the golden '80s, the last great age of American films I think. I watched the video of 'After Hours' so many times it wore out and am happy it is now available on DVD. But I hesitate to buy said DVD. Why? This film is extremely disturbing, and not really a comedy but a gruesome and pitch black snapshot of NYC culture that cuts very close to the bone for those of us who knew the nightlife of Sunset Boulevard on the other side of the country. The similarities between NYC and LA at that time were legion, the only difference being the cavernous, sinister streets of NY were not lined with palm trees. David Lynch's 'Mulholland Drive' best captures that aspect of danger and tragedy on the west coast that Scorsese has captured on the eastern seaboard.

    Griffin Dunne has to be the most under-rated American comedian and it is a very good thing his gifts were captured so beautifully in 'After Hours'. His character seems to be the only sane person in Manhattan. He is mostly surrounded a bevy of beautiful and hopelessly neurotic and ruthless women.

    Rosanna Arquette, a strange actress all on her own, is cast in a very weird part in this film. Nothing she does makes sense which makes her behavior entirely plausible within the circumstances of her environment. Kafka, the author Dunne's character is reading, sets the tone for this dark and dangerous story. Arquette is perfect as the doomed suicide, a sort of modern grand guignol character. She is also tremendously annoying and it's a relief when her whining person is dispatched in the creepy loft she inhabits with Linda Fiorentino.

    There is a fine performance from Linda Fiorentino (whatever happened to her?), as an s/m style dominatrix/artist in SoHo who leads Paul (Dunne) a merry dance through the darkest bowels of the nightclub scene during the "punk" hey-day. Terri Garr, a seemingly sweet and "normal" city girl, a blonde, all-American girl living in a sickeningly sweet and Dada-esquire little apartment. She is the most horrifying of all the women Paul encounters. She struck me as being a potential murderess should Paul have decided to linger longer with her. It was a great relief when he escaped her burgeoning hysteria and ran back into the streets. Verna Bloom's motherly artist caps off Paul's horrible journey by encasing him in plaster of Paris and leaving him in a basement flat fit for Frankenstein's monster.

    John Heard is entirely weird and menacing as a soft-spoken but highly-strung bartender, another mass-murderer waiting to blossom looms in the background of his personality.

    Scorsese has zeroed in on the familiar things in our lives in a most alarming manner. Cheap bathrooms in cheaply renovated lofts and cramped little apartments. The god- awfulness of the lives of these people is deeply disturbing, and now that I am19 years older than when I first watched this film so avidly, I am not so sure I want to dive back into that vortex of neurasthenia and darkness again.

    But I probably will. One of Scorsese's best and definitely his most under-rated film.

    Watch at your own risk.
  • Perhaps one of the Scorsese minor masterpieces that sometimes get lost when considering "Goodfellas" or even "Mean Streets," films that get the bulk of the chatter. This, along with "King of Comedy" run in a very different vein, combining black comedy with tension and suspense as a central spine to the piece. Sure, Goodfellas has some black comedic moments, but on whole, it stands as a "drama" rather than a comedy. This is a VERY different film and will cause you to laugh and to shake your head in sympathy and mutter "Oh NO" more than once. I rated it a 9, I have no idea why this got lower marks than that. See it more than once.
  • One of my tops. Classic NYC and holds up. The story is so something I'll never let go. Under rated.
  • kosmasp22 April 2021
    I have been known to be nice to movies ... I've also been known (at least to myself), that I have issues with characters or choices that I am not comfortable with or think the movie went wrong in certain places. Now our main character here is not the most likeable. And that is something that really makes it hard to feel for him at certain stages, which is something that dampens the movie and its impact quite a bit.

    If that does not bother you as much, you can easily add another point to my initial rating - or maybe two. I am quite sure I had seen the movie before, but I did't remember it at all. Seen or not I remember seeing the video tape at video stores ... I reckon I have aged myself. Or alienated those not familiar with the terms/words I just used. Whatever the case, if anyone feels that way, wait til they see a movie where the main character is not able to use a cell phone or internet ... I know, shocking! But true as this movie is able to show us.

    The movie is well done, which is no surprise considering Scorsese did it. Great cast and suspense from start to finish.
  • To get an understanding of the caliber film we're dealing with, you have to imagine some of the finest elements of other films being wound into a tight 95 minute package and directed by the incomparable Martin Scorsese. After Hours reminds this critic in many ways of Stanley Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut. But somehow it seems to be about the best elements of that film. Our film deals with a mild-mannered Manhattan office worker taking a late night trip to the Soho district to meet up with a beautiful woman he first encountered earlier in the evening. So, much like with Tom Cruise in EWS, we have a protagonist searching for love in a world completely foreign to him. But instead of a never ending and overly talky film, we get a tightly wound and much better paced film from Scorsese. When the film does slow down for conversations, the ones we're treated to are comparable to the best Tarantino ever wrote for any of his films. Fortunately we don't get too many of them, like we would in a Tarantino film, however.

    Griffin Dunne plays Paul Hackett, who is bound and determined to hook up with Marcy (Rosanne Arquette) whom he met in a restaurant earlier that evening. Once he makes it to Soho, Paul quickly realizes this spur-of-the-moment rendezvous may have been a terrible idea. Apparently Soho is (or was in 1985) a macabre place full of eccentric artists, bondage enthusiasts, and vigilante mobs made up of mostly gay people. Not only does Paul fail to score with Marcy, he ends up being stranded in the neighborhood with no money to get home, and being blamed for several apartment break-ins by a crowd that wants his blood! Every place or person he turns to for help seems to get him deeper and deeper into danger. There are all kinds of famous or soon to be famous people popping up in little roles here and there. Will Patton as a leather clad bondage enthusiast may be the most odd. Also look for Scorsese in a nightclub sporting a beard and shining a spotlight down on the rowdy patrons.

    Unlike many Scorsese films, this one does not rely much at all on violence to get the point of danger across. I believe there is only one violent death, and the victim is not a main character. But in true Scorcese form, the scene produces a laugh! More than anything else, this film has a claustrophobic feeling. It's as if the world is crumbling all around Paul Hackett, and the next door he walks through may be his last. By the final fifteen minutes, he finds himself in the apartment of a gay man he picks on the street. To the man's obvious disappointment, Hackett simply wants someone to tell his story to. Before the scene has any type of logical conclusion, Hackett finds himself back on the street running for his life once again. His momentary attempt at finding compassion shattered in the blink of an eye. The whole film is kind of like that.

    After Hours may not be for all tastes, but this critic first saw it back in junior high and never forgot what a treasure it is. 10 of 10 stars.

    The Hound.
  • I'll admit I was hesitant to see this underrated Scorcese film. His previous black comedy The King of Comedy is still what I consider one of the worst movies I have ever seen and while Raging Bull and Goodfellas are undeniable masterpieces as well as the wonderful Aviator re-visiting Scorsese's filmography I was also disappointed in Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore.

    I didnt go into this with high expectations but surprisingly it was an entertaining enough film, far better than the aforementioned Scorcese disappointments and the acting and directing were both good, but this is labelled as a black comedy and I didnt laugh.

    Not to say that makes it a bad film by any means. I just feel it is far more effective as a drama, or even crime thriller.

    Griffin Dunne who I haven't seen in much aside from his supporting role in My Girl which came along six years later does very good in the lead, and the supporting performances from Rosanna Arquette, Terri Garr, John Heard Catherine O'Hara and Cheech and Chong are also very good.

    The film is far too interesting to ever be boring and I was never bored while watching it but I just expected some dark laughs and there weren't any.

    As a crime drama this works and any Scorcese fan or fans of these actors should definitely give it a look.

    View it more as a drama or even a suspense film and you will probably enjoy it even more.

    As it stands it's a solid entertaining effort with good performances. Not Scorcese at his best but very watchable and entertaining nonetheless.
  • This is my favourite of all Martin Scorsese films. I didn't say it was his best, but for my time and money, I'd rather watch "After Hours" once a month for the rest of my life than anything else he's ever directed.

    Unlike "Taxi Driver", the vehicle for hire here inspires a ridiculous, yet strangely believable idiotic odyssey through darkest Manhattan, as Griffin Dunne (never better) is simply looking for a nice woman to spend a few hours with and ends up fighting for his damn fool life instead. His Paul can't get a break until art intervenes (suggested by the late, great Michael Powell), bringing this hilarious endurance test back to square one again.

    If you've never watched this, you're in for a treat. Linda Fiorentino and Rosanna Arquette (each at her sexiest) are terrific in the night and day loft mate roles. Character specialists Will Patton and John Heard get the best parts of their early careers. And the disc has one of the most rewarding and complementary to it's subject special features ever, definitely worth giving nineteen minutes of your time to. The pre-Disneyfied New York on display is both charming and deadly.
  • 'After Hours' is a film, that is meant for a certain audience. A Dark Comedy by Master Filmmaker Martin Scorsese, that offers shock value, some engaging moments, but, it's dark tone, will not attract everyone.

    'After Hours' Synopsis: An ordinary word processor has the worst night of his life after he agrees to visit a girl in Soho whom he met that evening at a coffee shop.

    This Dark-Comedy is meant for a certain audience. Scorsese's Direction is fantastic, while the writing material is fairly engaging & offers shock value. But, as said, the dark tone and the complicated narrative, will not attract everyone. You need to be in a certain mood to absorb a film like 'After Hours'. In my opinion, the film worked in bits. I truly feel the second-hour could've been better, and even shorter in terms of length. Cinematography & Editing are well-done.

    Performance-Wise: Griffin Dunne delivers a terrific performance. He beautifully executes and understands his character. Teri Garr, like always, is top-notch. Rosanna Arquette is impressive. Linda Fiorentino does exceedingly well. John Heard gets limited scope. Verna Bloom lends support.

    On the whole, 'After Hours' is engaging & absorbing in parts.
  • While reading the Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer in a coffee shop, the bored word processor Paul Hackett (Griffe Dunne) meets Marcy Franklin (Rosanna Arquette), and she gives her phone number to him. Close to midnight, Paul decides to call her and she invites him to visit her in the loft of her friend, the sculptor Kiki Bridges (Linda Fiorentino), in Soho. Paul gets a taxi and loses his money through the open window of the cab. Paul arrives in Kiki's place, where begins his surrealistic adventure along the night.

    I do not know how many times I have seen this movie along my life, maybe ten times, but it still attracts me and now I have just seen it for the first time on DVD. I love it and it is one of my favorite cult movies. The surrealistic 'saga' of Paul Hackett trapped in Soho without means to return home is fantastic and fascinate me. The cast, direction, soundtrack and camera are excellent. I believe it is the best role and performance of Griffin Dunne in his career. My vote is nine.

    Title (Brazil): 'Depois de Horas' ('After Hours (literally)')
  • FKDZ4 September 2022
    After Hours starts off tame but slowly gets more and more strange. In general this is an entertaining movie and it will keep you guessing especially the first half of the movie. But tends to fall off towards the end.

    Directing is well done, the quintessential dolly zoom on characters isn't missing here, a Scorsese trademark it seems. I love it though and it adds such a level of interest and importance to characters. There's some rotating shots and pans, some cool stuff. Lot's of variety. But nothing felt too special.

    Music selection is great, no original score, just actual music from classical to punk rock and oldies. Scorsese does this a lot and they definitely liven up the scenes. Though the acting is the strongest factor for that here.

    Acting is great and everyone has got this weird thing about them, none of the characters feel like they can be trusted except the main character and it makes it all the more weird when watching. There's always some way they blow up about something or act odd. It makes for entertaining characters and conversations which of course this movie needs considering it's 90% that. It's character heavy and the characters that are there are fine and acted well.

    The ''story''... or more so an experience that main character goes through, is engaging. There's all these links between everyone but whilst some of them work others are just there for the only reason to have a link, even if it makes little sense. In general I think most of the linkage was odd. But I have at theory about all the events that happen, it seems like this entire experience was some sort of play on Hackett. Like everything was set up, like some weird artistic endeavor where they put a random guy in the middle of their art ''show''. Especially towards the end when he meets June. And the room he goes into with all the plaster, on the left in that scene you can see a stack of those bagel cream cheese whatever -paper weights like they were prepared for something. It would explain all the links. And the lack of follow up on the dead girlfriend from the police. And all the timing and distractions from the people he encountered.

    That said that's just a theory. It's never said or anything. Generally though it was a pretty good movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    After Hours is the kind of movie that inspired lots of filmmakers but ultimately does not work by itself as a work of art.

    The film tells the story of an average 80s worker that finds himself into a bizarre adventure full of absurd and terrifying situations.

    The problem with the movie is that everything (the plot, the characters...) is so absurd that at the end you stop caring about what may happen next. The fact that the script jokes about thing that are not laughable (rape, suicide...) does not help at all.

    I understand that this movie's absurd humour and the way it deals with twisted versions of actual 80s fears probably were very innovative in its time, but nowadays its not enough to surprise the average viewer.
An error has occured. Please try again.