User Reviews (517)

Add a Review

  • As a zombie aficionado is it impossible to not have watched the Romero zombie movies, especially as they are such big milestones in the zombie genre. And also as they are the zombie movies that has the most heart put into it, no pun intended.

    This 1985 movie, directed by George A. Romero, is the third of zombie movies in his lineage of zombie storytelling. And it continues with the usual bleak world overrun by the living dead. Society has collapsed and the world is in disarray, with small clusters of people struggling for survival. But it is not the threat of the living dead that proves the only danger is the new dying world.

    Romero does a great job at telling the story he has in mind, and it is presented in a very enjoyable manner, which makes his movies quite entertaining and watchable.

    The story in the 1985 movie "Day of the Dead" is about a group of soldiers and scientists who have barricaded themselves in an underground bunker facility. Here they try to survive the dying world around them. Some scientists are studying the living dead in order to understand more about them and to control them, a study which does not sit well with the armed military forces.

    Granted that this movie is from 1985, so the special effects and zombie make-up is a bit outdated by today's standards. But it still works fine though, and the effects are still believable. But in the Romero movies it is not the special effects that drive the movie, it is the story and the characters; the special effects just help to progress the story and add a visual imagery to the dying world.

    The acting in "Day of the Dead" was quite good, and there is a very memorable gallery of characters in the movie. And there was even a very memorable zombie known as Bub. And they had managed to cast some good talents to portray the various role and characters. I must admit that I was surprised to find out that special effects master Greg Nicotero was in the movie.

    I assume that you are already familiar with this 1985 classic zombie movie if you are a fan of the zombie genre. If you are not, shame on you, then it is about due time that you get around to watching it. In fact, watch all the Romero zombie movies, as they are important to the zombie genre.

    I have watched "Day of the Dead" several times, as I have with all of Romeros movies, and it can sustain multiple viewings, because the story is so well-written and executed on the screen.

    "Day of the Dead" receives a seven out of ten stars from me. This is a good, wholesome zombie movie.
  • southdavid28 April 2021
    Our rewatching of the original Romero trilogy comes to an end with "Day of the Dead" which is perhaps the most unloved of the three but has some of the best gore moments of the series and a legendary jump scare at the beginning.

    With the planet all but lost, a team of scientists and soldiers have formed an uneasy alliance in a large bunker in Florida. Tensions are high between them though, with the soldiers bearing the bulk of losses, trying to capture zombies for experimentation. The situation comes to a head though, when it becomes apparent that chief scientist, Dr Logan (Richard Liberty) is more interested in taming the threat, than eliminating it.

    In so many ways, this is the best film of the original trilogy. The acting performances are better than any that have gone before. Lori Cardille in particular is excellent as Sarah, one of the scientists and the lead of the movie. Joseph Pilato, who has a tiny role in "Dawn" has a much bulkier one here, with Rhodes being the chief antagonist. Tom Savini's effects are the best we've seen, with some of the disembowelment that occurs towards the finale being the most striking and still very much holding up 35 years later. The character of 'Bub' is perhaps the most effecting of the entire series, though I do have to admit the idea of the zombies learning is an uncomfortable one and I'm glad that most don't explore that idea.

    Plot wise, it could be better though. Initially starting with a big scope, and showing a Floridian town destroyed by the outbreak - it sinks back down into the only real storyline zombie films have, that of man's intolerance of each other ultimately causing our downfall. This might have something to do with the increasing cuts to the planned story, that budgetary restraints forced on Romero. It's the bleakest of the films, demonstrating not just that survival is unlikely, but perhaps even undeserved would this really happen.

    That bleakness though speaks to me, and I do enjoy the film. "Dawn" is still my favourite; the score and the location alone see to that, but "Day" isn't that far behind.
  • In 1985 this zombie movie virtually went by unnoticed except for many Romero fans. It was virtually dead a week or two after it hit the theaters. Many attribute its failings to the other many horror films released that year including "Re-Animator", "Fright Night", and "Return of the Living Dead". All these movies were R though and day was not. Romero stuck to his guns and made a very gory movie. Unfortunately, when dawn was released there were still many independent theaters, but by 1985 the chains had taken over and one thing chains do is not show movies like this. So it went by unnoticed and those that did notice it usually had nothing good to say about it other than the zombies looked really good. So suffice to say, I wasn't expecting much when I bought this movie except the zombies would look good. However, I am happy to report that I was very pleasantly surprised. Granted, Dawn was still a better film as it had more likable characters than the ones featured in this film. This would be the final Dead film George Romero would do until Land of the Dead was released, but I do not count that one as part of his original trilogy as they seem to belong together because Night showed us the humble beginnings of the zombie outbreak, Dawn showed us the zombies beginning to overrun us and this film shows us a bleak world where the zombies now outnumber the living 400,000 to one.

    The story has a group at the beginning flying a helicopter in the hopes of finding some survivors. All they find is the dead and quite frankly, any survivors out there would be better off keeping their mouth shut as they do not want to go back to the facility this group belongs to. It is like a bunker and in it we have scientists who have no clue what they are doing, army people in a rush to leave said facility even though there is no indication there are any people left, two civilian guys just doing their jobs and Bub the most awesome zombie ever! Tensions are running high in the facility as the army people want to leave and there is a lot of arguing; however, things take a turn for the even worse and the zombies that are topside begin to lick their lips!

    This film has great looking zombies and it does a good job with its setting. Originally, George wanted to do something much larger in scope, but could not get the funding so he had to scale back immensely which is why we sadly on get the one shot topside in the city and get to see how much the zombies have taken over. Everything in this film is rather good, except the characters! Seriously, Bub who is a zombie is the most likable character and then civilian guys. Everyone else just wants to yell and rant and this film is not a good one to watch when you have a headache! The good news is that this creates a finale where you really want to see a few of these guys eaten and suffer, unlike Dawn where you just kind of get a random motorcycle gang out of nowhere.

    So this film is good, just not as good as Dawn as this one just does not have the action of that film and for a good portion of the film the only thing you have to look forward too in between the shouting matches between the scientists and evil Bono are the Bub scenes. It does help build up the finale and like I said, you really want to watch these guys get eaten, but it also tends to get annoying as no one really seems right. That is just the way it goes though, mankind is pretty much lost here and so why worry about trying to cure something that cannot be cured when you can just try and live out your life the best you can.
  • 'Day Of The Dead' is one of the greatest sleepers in the history of horror movies. A flop when originally released almost twenty years ago, its reputation has slowly increased over the years, and now is generally regarded as a classic. I certainly underestimated it for a long time. In my opinion Romero's 'Night Of The Living Dead' and 'Dawn Of The Dead' are two of the greatest horror movies ever made, but I always thought that 'Day...' was a bit of a let down. But after watching it again for the first time in several years (via the highly recommended double disc "special edition" DVD) I must humbly eat my words. This is a GREAT movie! Romero and special effects Tom Savini do wonders on a limited budget, and the movie is full of suspense, a claustrophobic atmosphere and plenty of gore. It probably flopped the first time around because it's so bleak, but now that's one of its strengths. Interestingly Romero features a strong female protagonist (Lori Cardille) and a strong black supporting character (Terry Alexander), something not all that common in horror movies. Both actors give good performances, the soldiers led by Rhodes (Joseph Pilato) are all suitably ultra macho and deranged, and it was cool to see John Amplas ('Martin') in a supporting role, but the two stand out performances are by Richard Liberty ('The Crazies') as Dr. Logan (who the soldiers refer to as "Frankenstein"), and Howard Sherman as Bub, the zombie he has tamed. The sequences between Logan and Bub are just terrific and add a whole new level of pathos to the movie. The only negative comment I can make about 'Day Of The Dead' is that it brings home the depressing fact that George Romero hasn't made a truly outstanding movie in close to twenty years. I really hope he makes his long threatened fourth Dead movie 'Dead Reckoning' and that it turns out to be his masterpiece. But whatever happens he has already carved his name out in horror history as the creator of three classic zombie movies that just get better and better as the years go by.
  • While not quite up to the levels of Night or Dawn, Day Of The Dead still packs a story line that is just as relevant to day as it was in 1985, and boasts performances that are better than it should be. I really loved Lori Cardille here, and I'm surprised she didn't do much, much more than this.

    It has one of the best openings in horror movie history (and Dr. Tongue is likely the most impressive zombie in any of these films), but it does drag just a little bit in the middle. The antagonists (of which there are more than one), aren't your typical mustache twirlers, and Romero gave them some depth and nuances that actually made most of their actions completely believable.

    The climax more than makes up for the middle drag, and I love how Romero injected his undead with both horror and humor. A must for not only Romero fans, not only zombie fans, but horror fans in general.
  • The third film in George A. Romero's immensely popular "Living Dead" trilogy is by far the bleakest and most complex film the director has ever worked on. "Day of the Dead" received a lot of negative press upon its release in 1985 - people picked apart unsavory characters, OVER-acting from a no-name cast, and outlandishly gory special effects that only Tom Savini himself could be proud of.

    But none of this makes it a bad experience really, does it? I don't think so. For the reason that I usually detest zombie flicks, I have worked up a fondness for the works of Romero and over the last two weeks have separately watched each film in his trilogy.

    "Night of the Living Dead" (1968) virtually defined a new genre of horror movie-making and basically set the standards for the many zombie flicks that would follow in its footsteps. Next up to bat was the most praised film in the trilogy - "Dawn of the Dead" (1978) - which was more of an action film than a horror movie and was nothing short of epic. Then came "Day" in 1985, which got the tongue-lashing that I described earlier.

    However those that did like it, praised the Savini effects, its complex, plot-driven characters, and satire. While "Day" is certainly a step down from "Night" and "Dawn," "Day" is more of a claustrophobic horror movie and that allows it to stand on its own as a fitting end to Romero's trilogy. It's more in sync with the tension of "Night" than it is with the adrenalin-laced action, zombie-slaughterfest that was "Dawn."

    A team of civilian scientists and a loose army unit clash with each other's motives after they have taken shelter at an underground military base from the hordes of living dead that storm the surface above. The civilian scientists aren't seeking to eradicate the zombies like the soldiers are hell-bent on doing, but are instead trying to get to the bottom of what is causing them to be what they are.

    In doing so, they need live zombie specimens, which are held captive in a maze of dark underground tunnels where they're corralled like cattle. We later get what is one of the most profound and moving experiences in the entire trilogy with "Day," when we see one zombie, nicknamed "Bub" by one particularly eccentric scientist, who eventually learns what it means to be "alive," so to speak.

    "Day of the Dead" obviously isn't a perfect movie, but is more or less a fitting conclusion to one of the most daring film trilogies in the horror genre. It may be best to not watch "Day" thinking it'll be anything like "Dawn" just because it has military men blasting away mercilessly at the living dead. Zombie slaughter is few and far between and much of the first hour of the film is clashing dialogue between the characters.

    The darkest day in the world - "Day of the Dead."

    9/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This third instalment in Romero's series of zombie films is a mixture of the thoughtful, the satirical and the downright gory.

    The zombies are generally more of a sideshow in the early part of the film, with more emphasis on the semi-military group dynamics of the humans under siege. Romero expands upon this theme, by contrasting the 'egghead' Dr Logan (Richard Liberty) with the twisted, action hero-gone-wrong Captain Rhodes (Joseph Pilato). Both are anti-heroes in their different ways, fitting in with the 'Dead' series' clever refusal to countenance good and evil. Logan represents a fascinating, if potentially deluded and irrelevant academia; Rhodes a stunted, shoot-first, ask-questions-later militarism. Both are dismembered, neither approach shown to be 'right' or effective in the face of the undead onslaught.

    Again, the zombies are wonderfully crafted, though there is less poetry and surrealism in their depiction than in the magisterial "Dawn of the Dead". Barring perhaps the pivotal scenes of Dr Logan, with his application of behaviourist theory in training a lone zombie in his lab. These experimentation sequences have the sort of evocative use of sound that runs throughout the earlier film: the same sense of melancholy and dislocation, and Romero clearly relishes elaborating the 1978 film's core theme of the zombie regressing to previous learnt behaviour. There is a woozy, ambient calm to the scene where he tries to instill in the zombie a liking for Beethoven through textbook behaviourism. Otherwise, the music tends a bit towards the post-Carpenter 1980s norm.

    Performances are excellent, make-up and assorted guts present and suitably incorrect. However, whilst Lori Cardille is excellent, she could have been given more to do, and the progression towards the resolution is rather more contrived than in the previous two films. There are stretches towards the end where it gets close to standard action territory, and several characters are barely developed.

    This hasn't quite got the style and engagement of the previous films, but works on the level of a satirical exposure of mainstream action films and of dry academic theory. "Day of the Dead" is an admirably cynical and at times thoughtful piece of entertainment, always holding the interest.
  • Day of the Dead is George A. Romero's third Zombie film and it's by far my favorite. It has a lot of great social commentary on how we view the people with power and how corrupt that system can get. I enjoy the characters and the practical effects are absolutely amazing. Bub is probably my favorite Zombie in a movie because the character is pulled off so well. The entire movie has a lot of building tension that leads into one of the best third acts in any Zombie film. And just like with Zack Snyder's Dawn of the Dead I really can't find anything I dislike about this movie.

    I'm giving George A. Romero's Day of the Dead a 9.8/10.
  • A group of stressed survivors, composed by soldiers and civilians, share an underground military bunker surrounded by an increasing number of zombies. When the commander of the base dies, the tyrannical Capt. Rhodes (Joe Pilato) occupies his spot and the friction with the team of scientist reaches an uncontrollable level. Meanwhile, Dr. Logan (Richard Liberty), the leader of the scientists, develops a kind affection to the zombie Bub (Howard Sherman), showing signs of insanity. Sarah (Lori Cardille), the helicopter pilot John (Terry Alexander) and their alcoholic friend William (Jarlath Conroy) are the only lucid persons, being threatened by the rest of the survivors and the zombies. 'Day of the Dead' is a great conclusion of the George Romero's trilogy. Yesterday I watched it again, maybe for the fourth or fifth time, and I found a very claustrophobic story, having excellent nasty special effects. My vote is seven.

    Title (Brazil): 'Dia dos Mortos' ('Day of the Dead')
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This version of Day of the Dead is really good even tough it mostly takes place underground it still is really amazing!!! All the kills in this movie are creative and gorey!! Even tough it isn't really that funny but this is still amazing!! And the haunting 80's sound track in the background is really good!! And the zombie (Bub) is really cool!! When the creater of him dies and when bub discovers him you feel bad for him! Don't worry he gets his revenge.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Nothing too different. Maybe more of it. This the third in the George A. Romero trilogy of the flesh-eating undead taking over the world. In a high-tech underground bunker, a group made up of military and scientists dwell together actually cordoning off zombies to experiment with. There is some talk of even trying to domesticate these gut-suckers. The military would rather be rid of the walking rotted flesh; just as much as the scientists would keep a few alive. One mad scientist may have just crossed the line. A new commanding officer seems determined to let all hell break loose. Let the fun begin. Some pretty damn grisly images. F/X deliberate and pronounced. How hard is it for Romero to "out-gross" his followers? He leaves little to be desired. And there is a chance you'll get to taste your lunch one more time. Cast includes: Lori Cardile, Terry Alexander, Joe Pilato, Anthony Dileo Jr. and Don Brockett the chief Zombie.
  • I saw DAY OF THE DEAD at a drive-in; the second half of the double bill was DAWN OF THE DEAD (which I'd seen a dozen times by then, most often at midnight showings). I was stunned. DAY OF THE DEAD was as tight and as dramatic and as frightening as anything I'd ever seen. Although I'd championed Romero's movies in the pages of magazines like Famous Monsters of Filmland, Fantastic Films and Fangoria for years, I was totally blown away by the savvy evinced in DAY OF THE DEAD. No more of the tell-tale amateurishness of a "regional filmmaker," no more overindulgence: this is Romero at his very best, and a great movie by any standards. For critics who espouse the virtues of DAWN OF THE DEAD over DAY OF THE DEAD, take this simple test: watch them back to back, as I did the night DAY OF THE DEAD opened. If you're still not convinced, you may be a zombie yourself...
  • The third movie of the Dead pentalogy, this largely takes place in a military bunker. Like the cult classic Dawn of the Dead, Land… explores secondary issues like the treatment of minorities and exposes the dictatorial tendencies, the suppression of dissent and the racist and misogynistic streaks which run in people when they know they are not answerable to anyone. The screenplay is the real winner here as Romero writes a mean follow up to Dawn…which is commendable. There is a brilliant segment about the attempt to domesticate the zombie, echoes of which were present in a small sub-section of World War Z, the book. The gore quotient is remarkably high for a movie of the 80s with the last fifteen minutes straight from hell, thanks to Tom Savini, the SFX guru.
  • Imagine your one of the few people who survive the earth getting infested by zombies. Now your stuck in a military bunker with less than a dozen other people and your experimenting on the walking dead.Somehow in the middle of all of this the humans still find a way to end up in two opposing camps. Romero may be trying to capture the human factor of the original Night of the living dead but here it only seems to get in the way of an otherwise great zombie fest.The makeup is first rate and the gore is delectable but in my opinion this may be the weakest of the four Romero zombie movies.None the less this is required viewing for any horror fan.
  • "Day of the Dead" is a film that is an unfortunate sufferer of the "Alien 3 Syndrome". And, no, I don't classify those that are affected by the syndrome to be disappointing final entries in a trilogy. To suffer from "Alien 3 Syndrome", you must follow two exceptional films, and the entry that has preceded you must be so exciting and action-packed that when you dare take a grimmer, more deliberately paced approach to your material, you will become universally reviled, with many people failing to notice that you have more than your fair share of merits on your own. In fact, "Day of the Dead" has a LOT of merits - even more than the film that its syndrome is based on. While it doesn't quite approach the greatness of "Dawn of the Dead", it is still an intelligent, first-rate horror effort and stands as one of the best genre films of the 80s.

    In this final entry of George Romero's "Living Dead" trilogy, the walking dead supposedly outnumber the humans by a ratio of 400,000 to 1. Twelve people who have devoted themselves to studying and wiping out the zombies hole up together in an underground missile silo, and for all we know, these could be the last twelve living humans on the face of the planet. Most of these people don't capture our sympathy like the foursome who holed up in the shopping mall in "Dawn". Half of them are gung-ho soldiers who seem to take great pleasure in threatening the scientific team, and Romero spends much of the first half focusing on the bickering and intense conflicts between these people. In fact, for over an hour, the hordes of living dead get very little screen time, as the story focuses on the tension between the characters, and the efforts of an off-the-wall scientist to train a captured zombie named Bub to act human. Compared to its predecessors, this long section of the film may seem slow and talky, but it is always interesting and, for the most part, effectively performed by its unknown cast. Besides, it all eventually leads up to a corker of finale when the zombies finally invade the compound, and most of the humans become showcases for the brilliance of Tom Savini, who outdoes even himself in the gore F/X department.

    While most of this material is very grim, "Day" ironically has the most hopeful, upbeat conclusion in the trilogy - which, alas, is its only major shortcoming. The quick transition to the final scene is so abrupt and unexpected that the audience feels cheated, leaving the impression that the production ran out of money before the whole climax could be filmed. Indeed, Romero has often expressed his unhappiness about being underfunded for this project, which prevented him from creating a truly definitive final chapter for the trilogy. But while "Day of the Dead" may not quite be the ultimate finish to one of the greatest trilogies of all time, it is still a very satisfying conclusion (at least until Romero gets funding for his long-rumoured "Twilight of the Dead"). It may not be popular among everyone, due to many unfair comparisons to its superior predecessors, but on its own, it is about as good as horror films get.
  • venuslove10628 May 2016
    I adore this film, but I don't know why... Maybe because I didn't see it until many years after it came out and I was older and could appreciate it. Or, maybe because I just love John and Billy so much. I even like Steel and Rhodes in their nastiness. The one character I do hate is Miguel! I don't know if they intended to make Miguel such a loathsome character or not, but geesh! It isn't because he is mentally falling apart from stress, as Sarah so aptly points out in the beginning, but not only is there little character development for him, but what we do learn is that he does nothing to stand up for himself or his girlfriend, and doesn't speak up at all when he screws up, whether it's his fault or not. I just completely resent his character. Dr. Logan, aka Frankenstein, is even likable in his insanity. I was surprised to read that this installment of the dead by George Romero was the least popular of the three in theaters.
  • George Romero's zombie movies have always been standouts in the genre. Easily the best zombie movies ever, and contenders for the best horror movies ever. Night of the Living Dead (his first movie) set the ground work for every single zombie movie to come after it, and Dawn of the Dead, which came 10 years later in 1978 set the new standard for splatter and gore flicks. If you ask me, without George Romero's zombie trilogy, horror movies would have never been the same.

    Day of the Dead takes place after the entire Earth has become over-run with zombies. Every human must either hide, fight, or die. The movie follows two groups of people: doctors and army men. The army men pose as the bad guys in this movie (just as Mr. Cooper did in Night of the Living Dead) and the doctors pose as the good guys (as Ben did in Night). The groups of people are hiding out in a secluded underground base. The zombies await outside, while the humans try to come up with a plan to eliminate the zombie plague.

    Day of the Dead falls at the end of the trilogy. Being made in 1985, zombie movies were already high on the charts. Since the popularity of Dawn of the Dead, especially in Europe, a ton of independent film makers were pushing out these zero-budget zombie flicks faster than you could watch them. Finally, in 1985, George Romero and Tom Savini grouped back together to show the kids how it was done. Day of the Dead fixed all the mistakes that occurred in Dawn of the Dead, and turned out to be the perfect zombie movie. Day of the Dead IS the best zombie movie ever made.

    The main mistake that was fixed was the way the zombies looked. In 1978, Tom Savini (special makeup effects) was fairly new to the job, and couldn't take on the very large amount of zombies he had to apply make-up to. Therefore, he simply painted their faces blue. Here, Tom Savini had his own team of make up artist. The zombies in Day of the Dead look far more disgusting and gross. Facial decays and bite marks were abundant in this movie. Not only that, but every zombie looked different. No two zombies looked exactly the same, which added a small shock element every time a zombie appeared on screen. The gore in Day of the Dead was even more amped up than Dawn of the Dead. It looked more real, and came in much higher amounts. Day of the Dead ranks up with some of the goriest movies of all time; only Cannibal Ferox and Dead-Alive surpass Day of the Dead. For the way the gore looked, Day of the Dead holds the trophy for the best special effects I've ever seen in a movie - bar none.

    While the special effects have greatly improved, they aren't even the main reason I favor Day of the Dead over every other zombie movie. The reason Day of the Dead is, and always will be labeled as my favorite, is for the extremely serious tone of the movie. The characters in this movie (with the small exception of the doctor) are extremely serious and brutal in tone and pose an even bigger threat to the good guys than the zombies! It's Night of the Living Dead turned up to 11! The characters in this movie (especially Captain Rhodes) are very, very well written characters, although I wouldn't hold then as high as the characters in Dawn of the Dead.

    Day of the Dead is an extremely serious zombie flick with absolutely no humor whatsoever. It's serious, it's brutal, and has an extremely thick script with plenty to offer. Remember to bring a barf bag!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Aside from basically inventing the zombie genre of horror movies, George Romero seemed to push the limits when it came to how widespread the zombie apocalypses portrayed in his movies were becoming with each successive installment. Night of the Living Dead started it off with the undead swarming a town and farmhouse. Dawn of the Dead has them overtake the entire country, and now this film goes even further and has the zombies basically destroy the world. Even though the former is the case with Day of the Dead, the epidemic doesn't really appear any worse than in its prequel, but the movie does introduce a unique setting which Romero hasn't used before, and it forces more interaction between the characters because it is so claustrophobic. The story starts years after Dawn of the Dead finished. The characters are different, but an integral part of the ending of the last movie kicks off this one: a helicopter. A group of survivors, Sarah (Lori Cardille), Miguel, John and Bill are flying around the Everglades in Florida to see if any other survivors can respond to their pleas for assistance, but they get no answers. John lands the chopper at a former missile base, where they learn the former officer in charge, Major Cooper, is dead. His replacement, Captain Rhodes (Joseph Pilato), is an incredibly violent and unhinged soldier who is tasked with protecting the survivors in the base along with some scientists who are trying to conduct experiments on captured zombies, thinking they can be made less aggressive. During a meeting, Rhodes and his most trusted man Steel (Gary Howard Klar) threaten to have Sarah executed for standing up for Doctor Logan's experiments. Logan (nicknamed Frankenstein by the military guys) is kind of a nutcase and enjoys gruesomely dissecting the zombies to find out more about their habits. He believes that he is close to a breakthrough, but Sarah finds out that he is using the corpses of Rhodes' men as subjects. Knowing how unstable Rhodes is, Sarah keeps her mouth shut about it. When Logan's experiments fail to provide useful results, Rhodes loses his temper and says he is instituting martial law in the base, and will kill anyone who threatens his rule. Sarah, unsure if she will be one of the people Rhodes kills once her usefulness is exhausted, meets with John and Bill, who live in an RV in a tunnel at the other side of the compound. John expresses his belief that the zombies are retribution from God for humanity's crimes, and wants to take the helicopter for himself, Sarah and Bill and fly to a deserted island. Meanwhile, Logan continues with his experiments and hopes that he can get on Rhodes' good side if they pay off. He has been intensively studying a zombie he calls Bub, who is trained to use headphones, tape recorders, and even handle guns, suggesting he was in the military when alive. Rhodes unexpectedly shows up to the lab and observes Bub, but still thinks this science is a waste of time. Some time later, Steel, two soldiers and Miguel are trying to corral zombies for use in Logan's work, but one of them Miguel is handling gets loose and kills Steel's two friends. Miguel is then attacked by the zombie, leading to Sarah amputating his arm in hopes of making him immune to infection. An enraged Steel shows up to the RV with Rhodes at his side. They mean to shoot Miguel for letting Steel's guys get killed, but Sarah says they're going to have to kill her too. Rhodes cuts off all support for the survivors and scientists. Rhodes then finds out Logan has been using the bodies of his soldiers as nourishment for the zombies, and murders him with his assault rifle. Rhodes rounds up all the survivors and takes their guns from them. He then attempts to threaten John into flying them out of the base with the helicopter. When John refuses, Rhodes shoots Dr. Fisher, Logan's assistant. He forces Sarah and Bill into the caves bordering the base so the zombies will eat them, and Steel beats up John. In the lab, Bub manages to break free of his restraints and finds out Logan is dead. He picks up a discarded handgun and goes to avenge him. Despite the loss of his arm, Miguel decides to head to the surface and kill himself via the zombies, but not before opening the gates to the base, letting thousands of them flood the interior. As they tear him apart, he activates the elevator controls and brings the horde of undead into the base. Upon realizing the situation he's in, Rhodes jumps on a buggy and leaves his men behind to die. Steel and the others manage to survive for a couple of minutes, but the endless swarm of zombies eventually overwhelm them. Rhodes manages to make more progress, but comes across Bub wielding a pistol; something he's definitely not expecting. Before Rhodes can raise his gun, he's shot twice by Bub, who salutes him as the other zombies rip him apart. John (who managed to knock out Rhodes and take his pistol earlier), catches up with Bill and Sarah in the caves as they fight through the undead horde. They climb up a ladder and make it to the helicopter just in time and fly off. Just like its prequel, Day of the Dead ends in the same way, with the survivors leaving in a chopper and leaving their ultimate fates unknown. When compared with its predecessor, I would say that Day of the Dead is probably not as good. I liked the setting, which is a far cry from the wide open shopping mall of Dawn of the Dead, but something feels lacking here. Most of the movie doesn't even focus on killing the zombies, and Logan's experiment's are a big part of the plot, which might put some people off. None of the protagonists are that likable, and Romero seemed to copy and paste some elements of the prequel's story into this one. There's still 4 survivors just like last time, people show up to make their lives harder, etc. Once again, Romero's visual style is unmistakable here, and the movie is quite bloody. Not that Night of the Living Dead wasn't violent, but this film (and DOTD) make it more noticeable because it's not black and white. Tom Savini is back doing the special effects, and he more than delivers. The most shocking display of the work he did is probably when the zombies kill Rhodes, as they literally tear the lower half of his body off. Assisting Savini were some artists who later worked on The Walking Dead, which has no doubt proved its popularity in the realm of zombie related media (if you exclude its lackluster later seasons). Overall, I would say that Day of the Dead is a unique movie. It's not quite as refined as Dawn of the Dead, but still has Romero's signature style attached to it. Only he could make such slow moving monsters something you truly fear.
  • This classic zombie movie doesn't hold back on the gore. I'm not a huge fan of the kind of horror that simply seeks to gross me out. While there are moments of gratuitous guts and gore, this movie offers much more. It reminded me of The Walking Dead series in the way that it focuses mostly on the drama between the surviving people. This movie puts us inside an underground bunker with this small group of survivors who are seemingly safe in their little fortress. The problem they run into is that the real monsters are the living people inside the bunker. The interactions between them are extremely tense. The suspense is real as we watch and wait for the moment when it all falls apart for these survivors. With the exception of the zombies, the acting is really good.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I did not like this flick at first. It took video and a few extra viewings to appreciate it. This flick grew on me-unlike Land of the dead-which was just stupid. I wish they had done more in the city, but understand budgets and time. Overall, I started with a three and ended with a seven on this one. And I saw it in a theater back in 1985. the most horrific part of the experience was watching Mick Jagger and David Bowie do their video of 'Dancing in the streets'. I remember friends look at me and say 'what the *beep*'?' Awkward stuff. This movie was a 'grower'. It took a few viewings to like it and I remember people cheering when the headless zombie met the shovel. Great stuff. Savini and Nicotero were at their best on this film, even if the plot was not that great.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    A cold, harsh sequel to DAWN with superior special effects and a viciousness that froths at the mouth. Aside from the brilliant opening sequence where the dead are introduced, the film does lack contrast and has a monotony about it.

    There is evidence of the dead developing conscious rather than instinctive will in the character of "Bub". The film's central location, a large underground mine, is plenty claustrophobic and serves as another storyline decision that addresses both Romero's financial constraints and thematic concerns.

    A sequence where zombies are rounded up in a pen is very suspenseful, as is the climax where the living dead prisoners go on the rampage for a feed.

    NIGHT had a strong black character, DAWN had a strong black and a strong female character; this outing has a fiercely independent white woman who isn't obsessed with the plays for dominance the male characters engage in. It is their undoing, of course, and all character arcs follow their inevitable curves.

    Bleak and filled with despair, this is another courageous work from a director whose best years were twenty-five years ago.
  • Acceptable though inferior third part on George Romero's Zombie series initiated in the original classic film Night of the living dead and with expert make-up artist , Tom Savini along with Greg Nicotero . This powerful horror film with more budget than George A Romero classic film , one of the most successful independent films of all time that was initially dismissed as exploitation, but when was re-released , it struck deeply with a disillusioned youth angry . Here there is a team searching for survivors of a terrible crisis that began almost a year earlier . Flesh-eating zombies taking over the world and scientific experimenting on zombies . It deal with a small group of military officers and scientists (Lori Cardille , Terry Alexander) dwell in an underground bunker as the world above is overrun by zombies . As creatures trap a female scientific named Sarah and an army of angry soldiers commanded by a stiff-upper-lip officer called Rhodes (Joseph Pilato) . There a scientist wants to study them .

    This gory film contains chills , thrills , graphic scenes of cannibalism and violence , dismemberment and other scary carnage in which real pig intestines were used during the gore scenes. Gruesome third film, combining gore, 'bona fide' frights horror and in dirty style with simple characterization . The first time the Zombies appeared was in ¨White Zombie(1932)¨. From then on Zombies remained a firm staple of terror B-genre , bringing the dead back to life was a popular pastime in the 30s and 40s . The early zombies were basically genteel beings and generally likable and agreeable types . Romero created in Pittsburg his own production company Image Ten Productions with his friends, John Russo among them and they each contributed 10.000 dollars and formed the budget for his first ¨Night of living dead¨ movie which made Romero world famous and he gave birth to the modern Zombie genre . Most of the zombie extras in this film were Pittsburgh residents who volunteered to help in the film . This follow-up that doesn't hold up to its predecessors is mostly set in an underground bunker , but results to be relentless claustrophobic and talky for over an hour . The underground facility was not on a soundstage , it was shot in the Wampum mine, a former limestone mine near Pittsburgh, that was being used for a underground storage facility ¨Day of the dead¨ is even gorier than the first two "Dead" films . Unlike the other pictures this one has no truly agreeable roles to root for . Being easily the least of the entries and the lowest grossing film in George A. Romero's "Dead" trilogy. Nonetheless, it's gained a cult following over the last two decades and director George A. Romero claims this is his favorite film out of the original "dead trilogy".

    This trilogy formed by ¨Night of the living dead¨, ¨Dawn of the dead¨ and this ¨Day of the dead¨ were of the first successful independent terror productions influencing and inspiring countless imitations, copies and rip-offs . Romero gave birth to the modern Zombie genre and the film has had a lasting importance , giving interesting consideration to the violence executed by the zombies . And many years later Romero directed ¨Land of dead (2005)¨ with high budget played by Simon Baker , Asia Argento and Dennis Hooper . And also an inferior remake in 1990 by Tom Savini with Tone Todd , Patricia Tallman in which again a bunch of people are pursued by ghouls Zombies .
  • The living have lost the war and now the dead have taken over.A small pocket of survivors consisting of a military and scientific team staying in a secure underground bunker doing research,trying to find an answer to why the dead are walking,and also trying to find any other survivors,but without much success.The sequence of events that follow ultimately lead to their self destruction.Plenty of gore including usual gun-shots to the head,decapitation,amputation,bodies ripped apart,entrails eaten,throat rippings etc.The special effects by Tom Savini are truly outstanding and these scenes where Dr Logan(Richard Liberty)tries to train a zombie are simply amazing.If you love gore you must see "Day of the Dead".Highly recommended.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Not to be confused with Mexican holiday on November 2, aka Día de los Muertos. Day of the Dead is a 1985 horror film by director George A. Romero. It's the third of his Living Dead Series movies after 1968's Night of the Living Dead & 1978's Dawn of the Dead. Romero has described the film as a "tragedy about how a lack of human communication causes chaos and collapse even in this small little pie slice of society". I think the movie, somewhat shows that. The movie has three types of human survivors, each of whom have been given a task to figure out, what cause the zombie apocalypse, and how to solve it, by the government. The scientists have been ordered to find a resolution to the epidemic, but are tempted to violate nature's boundaries guarding life and death. The soldiers who are assigned to protect the doctors appointed to study the zombies, but are tempted to enforce fascistic control and destroy the specimens in an act of rebellion. Last are the civilians who are assigned to serve both groups with basic though necessary services like transportation and communication, but are tempted to abandon the cause and, instead, live out their last days in peaceful abandon. Since there is hardly any government, oversight, the three groups quickly clash each other, creating an emergency within the underground compound, in which they live. Can they work together and save society or will society collapsed due to the pressure of the disaster? Watch the movie to find out! Without spoiling the movie, too much, I found this film is one of the goriest film ever in the whole George A. Romero's Zombie series. There are plenty of scenes of people getting ripped to pieces. Very gruesome and very realistic. Actual pig intestines were used for filming. The crew, filming this movie, really had to have a strong stomach. And to make things worse, the refrigerator the intestines were put in broke over a weekend, causing the intestines to rot. One can only imagine the smell. The visual effects are pretty good for the most part. Tom Savini and his crew, really did a great job. Lot of creative new zombies. The make-up work is 100 times better than the previous films. Still, the budget was somewhat limited. The original script, for which George A. Romero couldn't get money for, involved the scientists living above ground in a fortress protected by electrified fences and the military living safely underground. It also involved a small army of trained zombies facing endless amounts of untrained zombies. Parts of this plan, would later became the basis of his later film, 2005's Land of the Dead. George Romero's less than flattering opinion on the US military is particularly obvious in this film; none of the soldiers have any redeeming qualities. They are racist, sexist and all around bad guys when it comes to dealing with both the dead and the living. It could be argued that they were going insane after all the isolation and the threat of zombies, or that all the decent soldiers have either died heroic deaths already, or deserted in hope of protecting their loved ones elsewhere. Still, I found, characters like Johnson (Gregory Nicotero) & Steel (Gary Howard Klar), somewhat likable & entertaining. While, Joe Pilato is over the top as Captain Rhodes. I found, his role, one of the better acted parts in the film. Although never confirmed, it has been rumored by fans that the character Pilato played in Dawn of the Dead is in fact Rhodes as a cop, before joining the army. Who knows! I love how the movie does somewhat reference, the previous films, but this series isn't really known for its continuity. After all, it has a Stephen King book from 1975 if the world start to go to sh*t in 1968. It's one of the suspension-of-disbelief conventions that viewers simply have to accept. The scientist subplot with Dr. Logan (Richard Liberty) & Bub, the zombie (Howard Sherman), while emotional entertaining and both well-acted, felt like a different type of a movie. It truly does remind me of Frankenstein mixed with X-Men. Honestly, I really don't get, why the scenes, were in, there since the subplot really goes nowhere. It's still somewhat, jarring, seeing a zombie shot a gun. My taste of zombie movies, I would rather, not see that. In my opinion, the movie doesn't really have, much likable characters in this film. I really couldn't stand the heroes, as well. While, Lori Cardille & Jarlath Conroy did a semi-good job with their roles. I really didn't like Terry Alexander. His over-the-top fake Caribbean accent was really, horrible. The movie does have some good scares. The infamous calendar on the wall is one of the best. Day of the Dead's electronic theme is very cold and clinical and very good at conveying the isolation and paranoia the main characters feel. While, the movie isn't as fun as 1978's Dawn of the Dead; time has gone by, enough that people have begun to view it in a more positive way for the movie's serious tones. It's far better than the 2008 remake by director Steve Miner. Then, there is an official sequel called Day of the Dead 2: Contagium which nobody from the original movie had any involvement with, so it's not worth, talking about, beyond that. Overall: I know the movie had a tough act to follow, but Day of the Dead is another zombie classic from Romero. Highly recommended! It's worth the watch.
  • George Romero's "Dead" movies, Night of the Living Dead and Dawn of the Dead, are perhaps best known for their graphic gore, but that the success of those films was due to more than just Romero's willingness to show blood-and-guts is confirmed by this movie, the third installment in his trilogy. Day of the Dead more than outdoes its predecessors when it comes to grossing out the audience, yet I nonetheless found it disappointing. As surprising as this might be for a low-budget horror flick, Day's fatal flaw is in the area of plot and characters. Romero may not have gotten Oscar-caliber performances in Dawn, but the performers were likable, and the story of their travails, though not exactly complex, was an involving adventure story. In the final Dead movie (as of this writing) on the other hand, the story never takes off. The characters spend almost the whole movie locked in an underground complex protected from the hordes of the undead. They are divided between scientists studying the zombies and soldiers assigned to protect them, plus two helicopter pilots. Of course, there is much conflict between the two groups as there is with the zombies. So far, this sounds like a good setup for a horror movie, but Romero botches the execution, probably due to an over ambitious desire to make a serious statement, which should not be a horror filmmaker's first priority. Romero should have gradually increased the tension between the characters, as in The Thing. Instead, they're screaming and pointing guns at each other almost from the very first scene. This dissipates all of the tension, and clearly prefigures the ending. There's very little real conflict, since the soldiers are depicted as complete bumbling fools. Romero lets the actors playing the soldiers overact shamelessly, and the dialog he writes for them is simply terrible. These guys are so annoying that I couldn't for them to get eaten. What's the point that Romero is trying to make here- that soldiers are bad? When, inevitably, the military turns on the scientists, it's for reasons that the scientist could have at least tried to explain. Another problem with the story of Day is the pacing.Dawn of the Dead may have had a relaxed pace, for which it has sometimes been criticized, but it worked because Romero began with the zombies overtaking civilization, relaxed the pace after the heroes barricaded themselves, and then finished off with a spectacular final attack by the zombies. Here, on the other hand, there's barely any action until the very end. That's means that dialog has to carry the weight up until the end, and neither Romero nor his actors are up to snuff.
An error has occured. Please try again.