User reviews

Unfortunately the US version isn't available to UK residents. However after bingewatching the marterpeice that is Australian Survivorm I am mostly comparing it to that show.

To put it shortly....this is mostly garbage.

I LOVE Joel Dommett in the Masked Singer and he makes me laugh in this with his "so bad it's funny" puns but I must admit he is a bit out of place in this show. And yet he is one of my brighter points of UK Survivor.

As for the contestent, it's obvious they have no idea what they signed up for. Whining about being lied to, annoyed that they can't trust anyone. I just found myself rolling my eyes at almost all the players (especially you Lee) because they didn't seem to understand that this a a GAME and that it's supposed to be about STRATEGY and yet there is hardly any strategy in the UK version. Add where are the Idols? And please fix that cheap and nasty parchment paper! The voting is always so cringy to watch because it just looks like normal paper intentionally crumpled up repetitively to give it a tacky look. It's embarrassing to watch poor Joel try to open up and reveal the votes. If you haven't watched Australian Survivor on Amazon prime, it is much MUCH better than this. There is alot less whining and people are more likeable....even the 'villains'

Well, the U. K ..ie my home finally got round to doing another series of Survivor after many, many years and they seem to have paid a bit of attention to other franchises and basically gone back to early days of the U. S version because that really was the best. (With acknowledgment to Australian version where I'm convinced that at times they're out to kill them) What they haven't done is gone wildly politically correct or at least they haven't smashed it into our faces they've just a shown us Brits as we are. They have done a pretty good cross representation of us Brits...from the posh Toff to the not so posh working class with everything in between. And our nations and regions are shown. And they actually left the survivors with nothing initially, old style, earn your stuff the hard way !

Even Joel isn't as annoying as he can be. My only real and constant gripe is the background music. It's far, far too loud. It's intrusive, relentless and infuriating. On U. K TV we suffer from 'whispering' where for some reason the broadcasters seem to think we don't need to hear the words that are said...they are either drowned out by background music or the voices are so quiet you struggle to hear. Many folk leave subtitles on permanently...it really can be that bad.

So BBC do us all a favour and tweak the sound levels...it spoiling a good programme.

Give it a whirl....these survivors mean business, just like they used to.

Survivor fan since 2000 here. Despite straying away from the show here and there, I always go back to it.

Season 45 is my first back watching since Covid hit, and boy am I glad I decided to watch this season as it's been really good.

I quickly caught wind of the existence of a UK version (actually, more like a reboot as the UK had previously tried their hand at Survivor in the early 2000s, with poor results) which was airing at the same time as the US version, and figured, winter is coming, I live in Canada and I don't ski, skate or follow hockey, so it's not as if I had better things to do than taking on a double dose of Survivor.

I won't lie, the first couple of episodes were pretty slow. I almost felt like I was being transported back to the first season of US Survivor, watching Richard Hatch figure out how this game worked before everybody else he was playing against on that season.

It was pretty clear from the get-go that most of the cast of this Survivor reboot knew very little about the show and needed some time to understand what the hell they had gotten themselves into, unlike the American contestants who start talking game and building alliances the second they step off the boat.

I think it's also safe to venture that the slow pacing of the early episodes was a way to properly introduce an audience who might not be familiar with the strategic dimension and the cutthroat nature of Survivor; and given how sometimes needlessly convoluted and complicated US Survivor can be these days, with all its twists and idols and amulets and advantages, I'd say it was a wise decision. If a long-time Survivor fan like me can barely keep up with all these trinkets and powers, an audience new to the show has no chance. So keeping things simple and straightforward early on was the right way to go.

The second batch of episodes (UK Survivor aired every Saturday and Sunday night) was better than the first one. Nothing amazing, but still, a neat improvement. Characters were starting to emerge, game talk was happening from several contestants, and things were definitely looking up. And they did keep progressing week after week, and I was thinking, we're started to have a pretty good little season going here... Not great perhaps, but very decent nonetheless.

Then the merge happened. And boy, did almost everyone left kick things into high gear. After this pre-merge which had improved week after week, my expectations for the post-merge had grown, but I'm very happy to say that Survivor UK far exceeded them. Several of those post-merge tribal councils were simply electric, that hanging-off-the-edge-of-your-seat kinda stuff. Seriously, I'm not kidding. This was grade A Survivor, surpassing many US seasons.

Watching these people initially stumble their way through this weird, brutal game of strategy where the pawns are all fellow human beings, seeing them slowly start to understand the game's mechanisms, how to use other people to get yourself further in the game, how to dispose of these same people without pissing them off too much because you'll need their vote if you make it to end, was pure joy.

And while this Survivor UK season was excellent in its own merits, for me, there's a second reason as to why I enjoyed it so much. I'm a bit of a Survivor purist, I like to keep things simple. And while I understand that a game as bare bone as Survivor Borneo would never fly nowadays as it would put north American audiences to sleep, I find Survivor US' habit of continually messing around with the format, insisting on adding often unnecessary twists very irritating.

And while the magic that was Survivor Borneo can never be recreated, Survivor UK allowed me to be transported back to a time when the game was a lot less complicated and completely devoid of the meta aspect of US Survivor, where players now constantly refer to previous contestants or things that took place in earlier seasons. And I don't fault the franchise for that by the way. This show has been on for 23 years, for God's sake, of course it's going to be meta and self-referential, and that too can be a lot of fun.

But what Survivor UK brought back to the show, was its innocence, as dumb as that may sound. I'm aware a few of the UK players were familiar with the US version and some are actual fans, but it seemed pretty obvious most of them knew very little about the show if anything at all. And getting to witness these folks navigate their way through this surreal experience, realize this is a game of numbers, but also a game where very real bonds are formed, and that to get further, they may have to betray people they genuinely like, simply feels like a privilege. Because it felt a bit like getting the chance to hop into a time machine to watch Survivor back in the early 2000s, before it became this super fast-paced meta game plagued with contrived twists and bags of tricks.

Oh, and I'm writing this a couple of hours after watching the finale, and I won't spoil the winner, but I'm happy to say it's a very satisfying one. That's an extra feather in Survivor UK's cap!

Tl;dr: Survivor UK starts off slow, then it gets better, then it gets even better, then it becomes absolutely awesome post-merge, you should go and watch it right now. You can thank me later. :)

I've seen every English language Survivor season. This is horrible.

It's as if it was made by people who never watched the show and certainly don't understand what makes it popular.

The players aren't interesting or people you want to watch.

The host, Joel Dommett, is annoying. His little voice is like fingernails across a chalkboard. And unfortunately, he really likes to talk. To make matters worse, they have him doing voice overs to narrate and explain things.

Instead of using the typical Survivor instrumental music, there are CONSTANT vomit inducing pop songs and cover versions of pop songs.

The paper they vote on looks like cheap toilet tissue that has seen action.

From the big things to little things, this UK series is horrible and should be marooned on an island and left for dead.

Reviewing series 3 which is presented by Joel Dommet and has been picked up by the BBC and I am really enjoying it, We are currently 4 episodes in and I'm hooked, I love all aspects of it, there is action, tension, drama and humour to it, from the competitive nature of the physical tasks which are entertaining to watch and emphasises peoples strengths and weaknesses, to the psychological aspect of game playing and such you then see in camp where people attempt to form alliances and divisions and sway others on who to vote out, Joel does a great job presenting it and brings comic relief at times, but is also able to add to the tension and drama when required.

This just didn't capture the 'soul' of survivor. Were any genuine survivor fans involved in the production of this travesty? It's as though someone was just sent a rough template and followed it without any regard to the fans who watch this show.

Please go and watch Australian survivor and see how it's done, this was cringeworthy and an opportunity for a successful UK survivor franchise has gone begging.

The presenter seems like a nice guy but between his style, dad humour and the terrible music between scenes you could have been forgiven for thinking you were watching an episode of love island.

We almost fall asleep during tribal council...the way they were counting the votes, opening the pieces of paper...so sloooowwww. It needs passion and fun...The American version totally fan for more than 15 years...we also love very much the Australian version...3rd option South African and last the U. K Even during the episodes there is a lack of passion and motivation...also I notices the edting and post production could improve a bit. The set and lighting atvtribal council could also improve as well.

After watching so many years the U. S version can't wait for another season to start, in this case not sure we will continue.

A poor version of an iconic tv series... just leave it to Jeff Probst! Even though classic phrases are reused by the host - they lack a presence and passion for the game. The tribes start the game with opportunity to take food with them back to camp (potatoes, pineapples - has the production team even watched the original Survivor series?), which seems a huge unfair advantage.

The concept itself of surviving on a remote island for a cash prize is a nice draw. However what keeps the audiences attention is the interpersonal relationships and strategy of the individuals to ultimately back stab and manipulate the players to become the sole survivor. The original American version carries the the tag line "outwit, outplay, outlast" giving the players 3 clear arenas to compete in to win the prize.

The uk version seems to missing this, and for some reason hasn't replaced it with anything, leaving this version lacking in interest and gameplay.

I mean maybe they can learn from their shortcomings and improve in the seasons to follow. Who knows.

Long story short - Jeff Prost the American version producer and host created the show and has so much passion for the project it's pointless having anyone else.

Come on, own up - who asked for this?

Probably nobody, knowing the BBC. Some boffin probably looked at an algarythm and decided that the numbers/data proclaimed that this show needed, positively needed, to be darkening our TV screens again. It was such a big success when ITV had a go with it back in the day of course...

No it wasn't - it crashed. This version didn't do much better, despite 'Strictly' giving it a massive leg up as its lead in show, and it being mentioned seemingly every two minutes through promos.

It's not very good, the host isn't very good, and overall it reeks of the BBC trying to play to the numbers and a young audience who don't watch TV anyway.

I hope it doesn't survive.