User Reviews (102)

Add a Review

  • I have just returned from a special advance showing of "All Or Nothing" at my local UGC and I must say, this film exceeded my expectations enormously.

    The film is about the lives of one family in a council estate and how each member interacts with the community. The Father, Phil Bassett (Timothy Spall) works as a Taxi driver while his wife Penny (Lesley Manville) is a checkout operator at a local supermarket. They are unmarried but have two children Rachel and Rory, the former being an angst-ridden, overweight layabout who is key to the film.

    Acting is superb. It is that simple. All but one performance is utterly convincing, especially Timothy Spall with his constant bemused grimace which sets the mood of both his character and the film. The one exception is Donna played by Helen Coker. Her role is played up too much and seems rather forced. Now if by any chance you're reading Helen, please don't be disheartened; I merely saw you as the "least best" of an excellent bunch and I have to criticise something!

    The script is authentic, witty and full of emotion while not being repetitive (barring the word "alright"!).

    "All Or Nothing" is one of the greatest portrayals of what it is REALLY like to be part of a down-on-your-luck working class family. I even believe the film ended too soon; there were a few ideas that could have been developed further. I mention this not as a criticism but as a tribute to Mike Leigh who actually made we wish this 2hr 28 minute film would go on!

    Fantastic! Eight out of ten!!!
  • "All or Nothing" certainly isn't a movie for the masses and I'm sure that many people will never see it or even think about seeing it and that is a shame. It's true that it is a rather depressing movie, at first sight, when you don't look closer and don't get involved in the story. When you take the time to dig deeper, you'll not only see the misery, but also a beautiful thing called love.

    In this movie we mostly follow Phil, a gentle guy who works as a taxi-driver and who lives together with his wife and two children in some social housing complex in London. His daughter works in a retirement home, his son hasn't got a job and his wife works on the checkout at a supermarket. They have the biggest problems to make both ends meet every month, but that's not Phil's biggest concern. He doesn't care much for life anymore, because his wife no longer loves him. But than something terrible happens to the family, bringing them all together again, as close or perhaps even closer as they have ever been...

    This movie is very realistic, hard and dark, but in the same time it is also very heart-warming. This certainly isn't a sugar sweet love story like we get too often from the big Hollywood studio's. This is what real life is like for many people. It has a social engagement (showing that even in biggest misery, people still care for each other and help each other), that probably will never be found in a Hollywood production.

    I guess it will be understand and loved more by people who like realistic movies in general and socially engaged movies in particular. I might even say that it will be loved more by the people who are used to watch other European movies (Scandinavian, Spanish, French,... movies often have a deeper meaning included). Personally I liked what I saw and that's why I give this movie a 7.5/10.
  • barberoux4 March 2003
    "All or nothing" was typical Mike Leigh. The acting was superb and the characters were realistic. His movies are more like a documentary than a screenplay. I become involved with the characters and I continue to think about them and their lives for a long time afterwards. The characters in this movie led bleak, sad lives. The small amount of happiness at the end of the movie isn't enough to overcome the bleakness of the story. I can't see how these people in the surroundings they live in and associating with the types of people portrayed in the movie could work their way out of their plight. Rory and Rachel are doomed to live in this bleak place. See, I get all involved with these characters. I think they are real. That is the power of Mike Leigh's films. This is a sad movie, an affecting movie. Ruth Sheen was the one bright spot, plus she has a lovely voice.
  • swbhoy14 November 2004
    Lets be honest, Mike Leigh's films are not for everyone. No effort is made to make them commercially viable, the cast are almost always, largely unknown and certain scenes are so harrowing that even the strongest viewer can find themselves distressed and perturbed. While these factors keep some people away, they also keep many others coming back time and time again. Mike Leigh is quite simply, a national treasure. And I don't mean that in the same fluffy "Gawd Bless 'Em" manner that people applied to Thora Hird and the Queen Mother. I mean that he is simply one of the finest and most honest chroniclers of contemporary Britain that we have produced.

    Make no mistake, the British have always enjoyed social realism. We can gauge that through that great yardstick of social self-perceptions, the soap opera. While the Americans produce soaps full of tanned, successful oil barons and their supermodel / actress mistresses, and the Australians show us their blue collar bungalow owners who like a beer with their mates and a barbecue on Sundays, the British make soaps full of characters who are little more than diluted, softened incarnations of Leigh's own subjects. People who work at checkouts and in launderettes, people who are trapped by poverty, alcoholism, violence and stifled or strangled ambition.

    But through it all , there's a hope, an anticipation of a better day just around the corner and that's what makes these films ultimately uplifting. Leigh has always shown that no matter how dire the circumstances, how forlorn the existence, love and hope, friendship and family, will find a way to offer support, comfort and succor.

    In achieving this, Leigh has the assistance of another of the U.K.'s finest - Timothy Spall. If ever an actor was capable of portraying at once the fragility, insecurity and yet the potential for sheer stubborn strength of the British psyche its Spall. His character in All or Nothing, Phil is an incredibly vulnerable man. A pensive, gentle man, trapped in his own doubts and in a world of people who react by lashing out, verbally or physically and so compounding his doubts and fear. He apologises constantly, and often appears to be apologising for simply existing. An under-educated but intellectual man he even apologises for having an extensive vocabulary, a character trait which Leigh uses cleverly but subtly by having Phil precede each "big word" with "wotsitsname". It appears that Phil is searching for the word, he isn't, he knows exactly what he's about to say but is reluctant to say it in case he appears educated or articulate. We hear Phil talk about destiny and saying "It's...wotsitsname..kismet". In a world of expletives and harsh words he's ashamed at his verbal dexterity viewing it as a weakness rather than a strength.

    Devices such as these help us understand technically why Leigh is just such a good writer and the way in which these devices are performed help us understand why Leigh constantly looks to Spall to anchor his scripts with his marvelous humanity.

    All or Nothing is a vicious, gut wrenching, graceful, uplifting gem of a movie from a master filmmaker. Its is performed by a marvelous leading man and a collection of wonderfully talented supporting actors. In a world of blockbusters and multi million dollar opening nights Mike Leigh continues to give us humanity, despair, courage and beauty. And do we ever need him.
  • Mike Leigh, in my opinion, is the greatest director ever! He needs no animations, CGI, big named stars or million dollar budgets to produce films of pure, simple genius. All or Nothing is no exception and is proving that as he ages his films have gotten better and better.

    All or Nothing reminds me of life on a council estate as I remember it when I was a kid. There used to be flats on our estate that, although not the same in appearance, where practically the same in their inhabitants: the drunk family, the quiet family (Phil's and Penny's family), the druggie families, the slightly odd kid, the angry violent boyfriend, the single mum with foul-mouth daughter. They were all there. Anyone who knows life on an estate like this would wonder how Mike Leigh can put together such an accurate snapshot into the lives of these families.

    Mike's films are totally captivating. To some, it might appear like nothing really happens in them, but what I see in them is a reality that is like nothing else on film. Sometimes they're funny, sometimes so almost unwatchably painful but never, ever dull or predictable.

    Once you're a Mike Leigh fan you're taken to a different level. I just can't take American movies seriously anymore.
  • I'm a huge fan of Mike Leigh and his latest does not disappoint. It is a typically well-acted working-class human drama. It has all of the elements you would expect from his films: the preoccupation with the effect of socio-economic conditions on the mental health & family/romantic relationships of working-class people, the theatrical exaggeration of certain characteristics almost to the point of making the protagonists into caricatures and of course the perfectly judged score which hits just the right note in setting the mood of the piece.

    The film centres around the family unit of cab driver Phil (the always excellent Timothy Spall), his wife (Lesley Manville) who makes up for his deficiencies in providing for his family by working in a mundane supermarket job and their 2 overweight children marooned in an insular existence with little chance of escape. The main focus is on their relationships, inabilities to communicate and articulate, and their individual outlooks. All or Nothing is extremely successful at conveying all of these aspects.

    Of course Leigh being Leigh also extends his portrayal to take in other dysfunctional characters living in the same demoralising high-rise housing flats. These include alcoholics, abusive partners in relationships and a young woman who uses her sexuality as a tool to escape the grim reality of her environment/ family situation.

    His bleakest since Naked but perhaps better realised and more coherent. There are (thankfully!) some moments of hope and optimism which are characteristic ingredients of his films but the abiding impression is one of hopelessness in the face of grinding poverty and ruined lives. A brave piece of work and an absolute must-see.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Another one of director Mike Leigh's languorous,semi-improvised essays of working-class life,ALL OR NOTHING seems a somewhat deliberate attempt to be as relentlessly miserable and pessimistic as possible;set on a dismal,down-trodden South London council estate,with plain,overweight,ugly,dissipated,resigned-to-their-fate tenants and their families,with a maudlin violin-laden musical theme for good measure.

    It was surely the case that Leigh knew even before the cameras rolled that such a scenario would be the easiest way to keep the majority of cinema seats vacant,as other similarly themed UK-based social dramas.Aside from the profanities abound,it does have the feel of a TV production,where it looks and plays better on the small screen.

    The film's saving grace is that at least it has relatively sympathetic characters at it's centre.Timothy Spall has and never will be Cary Grant,but he is nonetheless a very fine actor,and still manages to add some depth to his taxi driver role with an eternally hangdog expression.But Lesley Manville,playing Spall's wife,gives the film's best performance,with a painfully honest love scene involving them both towards the end easily the film's highlight.

    Aside from the relentless gloom,the film's main problems are it's sheer mundaneness.There may be a quietly effective,observational realism about them,but relatively little happens and some sequences are far too over-stretched and become very tedious.Leigh's habit of caricatures comes to the fore with a voluble Frenchwoman and drunken housewife,and the film's pacing is deadening,moving like a tortoise on Valium.But along with Spall and Manville,the supporting performances are solid all round,with the familiar comic actor Sam Kelly coming off best as a downcast,late middle-aged cleaner who makes half-hearted,hopeless attempts in trying to date the teen-aged daughter of Spall and Manville (Alison Garland),who suffers from shyness and obesity.Her foul-mouthed,lazy,even more obese brother (James Corden)suffers a heart attack while playing football,which in fact brings the family closer together and helps the film end on a mildly optimistic note.

    But this is untypical in light of what went previously;ALL OR NOTHING is not unwatchable,and Mike Leigh is a talented filmmaker,but less footage,better pacing and more humour would've made a better film.But Leigh and the actors would probably not have liked that,it would've made them more happier!

    RATING:6 out of 10.
  • silverauk27 December 2002
    Mike Leigh makes this movie as a sociological study because he wants us to be confronted with the state of mind of the working class of now. There is more poverty in the slums nowadays than say twenty years ago! Family-life is disrupted and children have many problems: overweight, sexual harassment, abortion (?). How will the rent be paid? And the loan of the taxi? What is going on in the mind of our son who does only look television and eat until he becomes fat? Why is my woman unhappy, do we still talk to each other? We are proud of our daughter who is a nurse for elderly people, but what is happening with our son? Even the dialogues in the taxi are splendid!
  • paul2001sw-13 September 2007
    Mike Leigh's 'All or Nothing' features some of the trademarks of his best known films: naturalistic acting, moments of extreme poignancy, and a sensitive portrait of those for whom modern life is not easy. But it lacks the more comic characters who have often adorned his work. In their absence, the result is one of his most understated, and downbeat, movies since his debut feature 'Bleak Moments'; and in spite of little jewels in the script, at times its almost painfully hard to watch. Additionally, the portrait of a very white British underclass, and the empty streets of the estate where they live, doesn't quite seem in tune with life as it is actually lived today. To my mind (and despite the Oscar nominations won by 'Secrets and Lies) Leigh's best contemporary portraits remains his early 1990s trio: the bittersweet 'High Hopes', the hilarious 'Life is Sweet' and the coruscating 'Naked'; but as he followed this film with the brilliant period drama 'Vera Drake', maybe he simply needed a change of scene to refocus his vision. Still, this film is definitely a minor entry in his canon.
  • Findoz13 May 2008
    I will not write a lot about the story since so much is already said in the preceding comments. However I will tell how I came to watch it.

    It was very late one weekday night and the rest of the family had gone to bed. I was dead tired and just about to turn off the TV - and there was this film, All Or Nothing, about to begin in one of the two non-commercial public service channels (which might be one explanation why it transfixed me - no interruptions with inane requests to buy anti-wrinkle cream). And I was just completely enthralled! I was dreadfully tired, my eyes were red and swollen from exhaustion but I just couldn't stop watching. When the movie was finished at around two o'clock my eyes were also red and swollen from crying - and yet I was completely sober and so unprepared for this absolutely gripping film experience with the most wonderful actors. One of the best ever!
  • This probably impressed me less than any other film by Mike Leigh that I've seen. But I mean that more as a compliment to Leigh than as a criticism of the film because its quite good by any normal standards. There's an odd quality to its narrative structure. The film has two distinctive halves. The first deals with the collective life of a housing project in Kent and seems almost like a British-ization of Bela Tarr's "Satantengo." It's relentlessly bleak- miserable people screaming at each other in conversations that go nowhere- and at times comes close to self-parody. I don't think I've ever heard the phrases "F--- off!" "You make me sick!" and "Care for a cup of tea then?" so many times in one hour. Yet, it retains a grim power, if for no other reason than the moments of mesmerizing cinematography by Dick Pope- its Leigh's visually splashiest film since "Naked"- and the characteristically wonderful score by Andrew Dickson. The second half focuses much more conventionally on one family, and is, taken in and of itself, one of the most warm and sentimental works Leigh has produced. Timothy Spall gives another great performance as a genuinely philosophical, and lazy, man. His marriage is put to the test. You feel happy at the out-come, but not sure its in anyone in the family's best-interest.
  • I really like this guy; he did Secrets and Lies, and Happy-Go-Lucky, and I'm about to check out "Life is Sweet." I'm on some nostalgic, vintage Britain trip. I first saw All or Nothing about 10 years ago, on cable, and came in halfway and, being an American, the times it was put on cable were about once every several years. And at the time I was in high school and didn't have my own personal computer or money to order a DVD so I just vaguely sulked missing this film. Now that I have my own means to hunt the film out I'm so glad I have! And with my trusty dusty internet I am able to see all these VHS gems I've stored over the years, like the first movies I mentioned, have the same director. So I feel I'm doing something right as far as taste, or Mike Leigh is.

    The film is about a connection of lives on a council estate/public housing complex. There's a couple with two kids that are less than models and not exactly skilled office workers, and neither are the parents. It's an overweight family of care home workers, supermarket workers, cabbies, and a bone-idle brat. You get the mother who has late-night timeouts to herself to grieve her existence, and the dad who digs for loose change under the cushions his couch potato son lounges on, a scene that silently, ironically shows how the cycle of poverty will continue within this family.

    Then there's the mother's friend, who is a drunk and her daughter is the council slag basically, who tries to steal the boyfriend of her mother's other friend's daughter. The daughter is Donna, a right stroppy girl who values her looks and nothing else of herself, which gives her a bad attitude that ruins her looks; the entire film she has a rough sneer on her face, or tear-stained makeup.

    The film shows the stereotypes without inducing eyerolls. Just like in Secrets and Lies (an AMAZING FILM that gives you laughs and tears), the soundtrack isn't cliché rap music to add to the mood of the urban setting, but it's somber violin music and no offputting lyrics. I don't know if the violin music is done to be ironic or if it's a way to ease and appease the upper-class or older viewers who probably need a break from all the aggression. But it's a contrast and kind of makes me giggle because it's music you'd hear in a Jane Eyre miniseries, and not in a film about rough "chavs" (I hate that word, but it's an inevitable and long standing part of English society, so.)

    Speaking of, then there's stuff like Daniel Mays who plays Donna's boyfriend, and his strong accent, and his entire script along with the other characters' is a rather intriguing glossary of chav slang like "doing my head in" and "bollocks" and "having a laugh"...it's endless yet not nauseating or annoying or forced. I'm not quite sure how much was ad-libbed/"mumblecore," or Mike Leigh's hand but I raised an impressed eyebrow at how Mike Leigh was able to do that, use that underclass attitude to add to the realism while making it funny without mocking them or ruining the film. So the social context of British historical and current events that create the too real contemporary "chav" culture is strong here, and Mike Leigh nicely portrays this bleak society somehow in many of his films.

    My only bone to pick is the actress who plays Donna. At first it seems like she is overdoing it but I know young women really do act this way and with their mums. Plus, she is pregnant, which makes women moody sometimes, and she has every reason to be angry if you look at the very utilised backdrop of impoverished tower blocks and screaming neighbours and a horrible boyfriend. It seems the actress has to really put on this hard act and bad attitude and her incessant "Shuh-ups!" to emphasise that her character is a chav and not a "regular" London girl. It's this attitude and accent and lingo that sets "chavs" apart from others, though they are a huge part of the demographic makeup in England and other parts of Britain. So I got over it. It is a bit crazy though that when she's battered and falls pregnant does this bring her and her single mother together.

    I think this lifestyle of unintelligent people was shown very intelligently. On the cable that I have it was ranked with 2 1/2 out of 4 stars. I know critics can be fickle but I was wondering why it didn't at least get 3. So perhaps the harsh setting and reality of white Brits (who are classically and mostly shown in film and art and music to be posh, upper-classed, intellectual) being shown here as the complete opposite was a hard pill to swallow and probably written off as hammed up rubbish, but no. I think it's got a skeleton of reality here under the embellishing skin of dramatic fights, and relationships, like Sally Hawkins flirting with a mentally challenged kid and how she chomps on gum the entire time and keeps flaring her nostrils. I'm not British so I don't know how many "rude girls" strut around provocatively on the estate all day, but regardless I don't think she played the role well to be honest. Someone *like* Lauren Socha perhaps, who can play chav rather naturally and endearingly.

    Anyway there's nothing here that I find unrealistic as far as the households and characters within and around, nor the situations they're in, nor how most of the actors/actresses played them, albeit some over the top, and I really appreciate this tour through the other half of British real life. Fine writer/director.
  • "All or Nothing" is a very, very tough film to watch. Many of the characters are unlikable and the rest just seem very sad...and rather pathetic. It's still worth seeing, however...despite its many, many problems.

    The story is about a lower working class family in London and, to a lesser extent, the families around them. Director Mike Leigh did a good job recreating this oppressive and anger-filled environment...and the acting is top-notch because it's so realistic. But seeing the folks being cruel to each other again and again wears on the viewer. In fact, I think editing out a bit of this would have made for a better film.

    So why did I still like it despite all this? First, when a crisis comes to the family, it also creates the possibility of change and growth...not pie in the sky and unrealistic changes but ones that are indeed possible. Second, during this crisis towards the end of the film, the acting is at its finest. Not a perfect film...but worth it for the finale.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Aside from Naked, I've been left disappointed in Mike Leigh's films and all for the exact same reason – sub plots and sub characters that are more interesting than the main plot & characters but don't get developed and are left as loose ends.

    This has been a reoccurring theme in the 3 Mike Leigh films I have watched recently (All or Nothing, Meantime and Life Is Sweet). In each case, there are characters and sub plots that come along and start to look interesting but just as they seem to be going somewhere, they are forgotten about as the main characters & storyline take over for about the last 20 minutes and everything else is just left unresolved. I have finished each of these films thinking "why??!"

    What is even more perplexing is that the sub plots and sub characters are usually more interesting than the main plots & characters. But even if they weren't, it's not very good writing or film making to start a storyline and just leave it mid air. It doesn't make any sense and yet it seems to be a theme in his films.

    Aside from that, I struggled to enjoy All or Nothing. James Cordon's character was great and interesting, but the remaining 3 family members were dull, weak, mopey and annoyingly subordinate. I found the reconciliation between the wife and husband at the end to be weak and unconvincing.

    I wish there had been more time spent on the 2 trashy girls who live in the same block of flats. Both them and their families were a lot more interesting.
  • Phil (Timothy Spall) is an overweight taxi driver who gets up late in the day and works intermittently, barely communicating with his family except for a few grunts. His philosophy of life is expressed as "We're all born alone. We die alone. There's nothing we can do about it". Mike Leigh has given us powerful portrayals of the underclass in his previous films Naked, Secrets and Lies, and Life is Sweet but none more powerful and moving than his latest, All or Nothing.

    In this film, Leigh looks at three families living in a dreary South London housing complex and captures their lives with an intimacy that is almost unbearable. All or Nothing has a documentary feel, almost as if the camera was just planted in the middle of the living room to observe. The conditions are familiar: unemployment and underemployment, alcoholism, teen pregnancy, isolation, and the inevitable loss of self-esteem and despair. It is, however, more than a drama of oppressive social conditions, but also of lack of communication between people who desperately need love but are too afraid or lethargic to ask for it.

    Spall's performance is a revelation. His unshaven face, disheveled hair, and hangdog expression communicate deep resignation. The film is bleak but Leigh mixes its heartbreak with joy. When a neighbor Maureen (Ruth Sheen) sings ''Don't It Make My Brown Eyes Blue,'' at a karaoke bar, her eyes shine with a glow that seems at odds with the rest of her life but is so contagious that even her most dispirited friends take notice.

    It is obvious, from the start that something is amiss. Phil says nothing when his obese son Rory (James Cordon) hurls words of abuse at his common-law wife Penny. Rory is an overweight bully who does nothing but lay around the house, watching TV and hurl insults at everyone in his path. Sister Rachel (Alison Garland) has a job cleaning up at a nursing home but also seems to be going through the motions of living except when she is interacting with patients. Penny works in a supermarket and does just about everything to keep the family going, but it never seems to be enough. The film's sub-plots add to the feeling of life reeling out of control, but none of these are fully developed and are just dropped without tying up the loose ends. Maureen's teenage daughter is pregnant by some lout that doesn't give two hoots about her. Another resident, unemployed Samantha (Sally Hawkins) hates her parents and finds herself seducing a very strange young man (Ben Crompton) lurking in the shadows of the complex grounds.

    The second half of the film concentrates mainly on Phil and his family. When a medical emergency occurs, the family begins to open up and express long buried feelings of hurt and resentment. The final confrontation between Phil and Penny achieves an explosive power. Phil tells Penny that when he's had enough, he just switches off the meter on his taxi. Penny responds that she doesn't have the luxury of turning off a switch and making everything go away, that she is still responsible for the daily chores and the condition of the family. After Phil finally reveals his deepest fears, a transformation occurs that is unmistakably reflected in the family's facial expressions and body language.

    Leigh does not offer simple solutions, but seems to be telling us that although life is painful, we can reach beyond the pain to get in touch with the beauty. He shows us that love is the glue that holds families together and that either there is love or there's nothing. As a result, All or Nothing pulsates with a humanity that, in spite of its bleakness, is life affirming and ultimately uplifting, reminding us that beyond bitterness, there is love, and beyond suffering, there is grace.
  • badjuju_0030 December 2003
    Warning: Spoilers
    Hollywood needs to take notes - this movie was great. Excellent plot, dialogue, acting, a perfect blend. This movie is about the lives of 3 families living in an apartment complex. Right off the bat, you can tell they are all unhappy - merely surviving and going along with their daily tasks. **SPOILER** When the son suffers a heart attack, it transforms the relationship within the family unit and also tightens the bond with the neighbours/friends.

    This movie was an emotional rollercoaster - laughter, compassion, happiness - life's twists and turns.

    The ending was perfect - it was not the average hollywood 'Happily Ever After' scenario, but you just had that feeling that they would be okay. I especially loved the fact that there were not too many characters, but we got to understand them and were able to laugh and sympathize with them.

    Great - I loved Neville! 'Don't give me sheckels!'
  • You know, I've seen alot of excellent films in my life, but All Or Nothing is a perfect film. The story was so wonderfully moving and touching, the direction flawless, but the collected performances in this movie are the best I've ever seen....and I mean from every single member of the cast. I was completely and totally awestruck by the quality of the acting. Thirty minutes into this film, I felt the strongest identity with each of the characters and my heart actually ached for them. There is so much truth and honesty, so much clarity, that I feel gifted just to have seen this movie and I will remember it the rest of my life. Absolutely fantastic!!! If this is the only drama you will ever see, do yourself a favor and let it be All Or Nothing.
  • Mike Leigh has gone too far with this one. This style of filmmaking has gone past its sell-by-date. I am sorry, but people just do not live like that any more. That level of poverty is not consistent with a family of three wage earners. What would Safeway have to say !

    Yes, you can find poor accommodation in South London (although this film did stretch it to the extreme); yes, you can find unhealthy people; yes, you can find miserable people. But.... would you ever find a micro-community like this where everyone is so screwed up and hopelessly wretched? These people would have committed suicide years ago. They did not even have any redeeming qualities and not one ounce of humour.

    Not only did this film bore me, it made me angry. I moved to Australia from SE England a few months ago. I watched this film surrounded by my new countrymen. I felt like standing up in the cinema and shouting 'Don't believe it, nowhere in England is this depressing'.

    OK, so there is nothing wrong with a film about 'real' characters no matter how dark they are. However, these characters are not real, they are made up stereotypes. This film is an insult to the type of society that Leigh thinks he is portraying.
  • DO Give it a go - avoid the temptation of caving in after what seems full on misery for 10 hours! . . . life can feel like that . . . see for yourself . . .

    Yeh Yeh, another Mike Leigh film I hear you say - but he's pulled it off again with ALL OR NOTHING. A strong lead of Timothy Spall and Lesley Manville struggle to keep their daily hum drum lives together.

    Now as ever it depends where you're looking from. Some comment it's a Middle Class view of working class life, but to be fair, Mike Leigh always does a good take on "Kitchen Sink" drama - and it IS drama at its very best. If you can stand the initial slow pace, and get through to the end without FF>> or surfing, you'll be rewarded with the wonderful way in which the so called working class (of which I am) bond together through travesty, injustice, need, desperation, loathing, loving and struggle.

    Those who have never been 'dragged up' on a Coucil Estate, may feel see it differently, but take it from a boy who knows - those characters in the film are my friends and neighbours, and I applaud Mike Leigh on his magic once again. 9/10
  • "All or Nothing" is a slice-of-wretched-life flick about a miserable dysfunctional working class London family. There's little arc to the story of walrus Phil Bassett and family who move sloth-like from day to day unhappy and unfulfilled. Undoubtedly an excellent film by film making standards, Mike Leigh puts the audience in the position of having to accept his characters' plaintive existence on faith by not showing the psychodynamics which perpetuate their misery and just giving us the result. In other words, we see sad people stewing in their own juices which makes the buy-in difficult and the protagonists more ignoble. Personally I was happy to see the foul mouthed fat kid keel over from heart attack though I don't think that was how Leigh intended the audience to react and I suspect many a weeping wallower was wringing tears from their hanky. Given a 2 hour run, misery throughout, and character we couldn't care less about without charity, most will find "All or Nothing" more nothing than all. (B)
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "All or nothing" is one of the most emotionally conflicting yet ultimately rewarding film I have ever seen.

    Veiled by its effectively subversive humour, this "difficult" film challenged the audiences to confront boundless human pain head-on (which may explain the need for some comedy to "soften the blow", I think). But if one rises to its enormous challenge, this film will deliver a catharsis not matched since the wildly swirling epic, "Magnolia".

    Many have commented on the quizzical reaction most everyone got from this obviously depressing film; very willing laughter. Outwardly, we can't help but laugh at its weirdly rhythmic/comedic presentation of depression (in all its different shades and facets). Some dramatic set pieces even seemed intentionally tweaked to make us laugh. Perhaps, Leigh trusted, or was willfully testing, the limits of a cinematic paradox; that the audience may laugh at a film's characters throughout a movie, but given half a chance, they may too have just as much capacity to cry with them. What can I say? In the assured hands of a master story teller like Leigh, this calculated gamble paid off big time.

    I was a devastated, liquified mess after being confronted by the exponentially overwhelming sadness and piercing emotional truths this film dished out. The hurt and despair the film's ordinary people bore, could just as easily be transplanted onto anyone who had parents or children, siblings or relations, friends or loved ones. In other words, its incendiary resonance / relevance was heart-poundingly honest and universal, whatever our social/ class divide.

    And frankly, to say the last third of this film packed a wallop will be like a monumental understatement. By then, I was already bleeding inside out. I was an emotional car wreck. For before I realised I was hooked by its imperceptible sea of sorrow, it was too late. I was already marooning in the deep end, struggling to stay afloat. Put simply, I was mercilessly pounded into submission by the sheer human pain with which each and every character in this film endured/ concealed.

    And guess what, I was still miraculously laughing throughout this ordeal? Either I am a masochist, or this film do indeed possesses the uncanny gift to force us into "keeping up appearances", no matter how bad it all seems....

    (Spoilers ahead)

    In fact, the final breakdown and confrontation between two key characters in the film was the most heart breaking moment I ever had witnessed in all the films I've seen. This whole film seemed logically set-up/ built-up to usher us all into this crescendo-like breaking point. Hence, imagine my immensely grateful relief when the film so mercifully, ended on a positive note of catharsis.

    (End of spoilers)

    IMHO, "All or nothing" may have been a top notch ensemble drama, I felt it would not have reached its full dramatic heights without the Best Male performance of 2002, that of Timothy Spall's (Or at least he'd have my vote anyway).

    Spall's sad puppy face incited the most laughter. His well-timed reaction shots to the situation around him were often pricelessly funny (either as a disillusioned loser London cabby or a disheartened loser father/ husband at home etc). But it was also his emotive face and his fearless performance in this thankless role that sealed the audiences' full sympathies with his character, and by extension, our wild abandoning regard for this stirring dramedy.

    In closing, I can safely say now that "All or nothing" can proudly stand alongside a film like "The Insider" (Another one of my all time favourite films). For it too possesses that rare quality of a 'slow burner'. This film's strong legs meant I won't tire of it. I will only grow to love it more, with each ensuing revisit.

    So folks, if my above slobbering words are to be believed, you have been informed. Go hunt for this highly recommended title now, and be richly rewarded.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Plenty of other reviewers have captured this movie, describing it as a hard to watch dose of poverty realism about some of the British underclass, brilliantly acted grimness, with a long time coming break from the apparently unrelenting nastiness (yes the people are not just miserable, many are often nasty) only towards the end, supposedly this brings a dose hopefulness to this group of people that could sustain them in the future, potentially improving their lives. Ah, if only. I know these people, I worked with them for years. Of course they have hearts and emotions and feel love etc, as well as anger, depression, envy, bitterness, etc....but in reality. These people don't learn from experiences as routine as this. They make the same dumb ass decisions, big and small all day long and eternally once adult. This realisation would be real but short lived, and wouldn't lead to permanent sustainable change in behaviours. So it's fake hopefulness. I love Mike Leigh, but there's a sort of underclass fetish aspect to films like this that is born of his empathy, but has a large dose of naïveté in it too. So bleak, what's the point?
  • CBW-222 February 2003
    In the beginning, while watching this film, I was alternately disgusted and infuriated. I was looking at the characters thinking things like "get a job", "say something" or "take a bath!". Needless to say, I ended up being humbled and deeply moved. We glimpse each character's inner world, revealing their pain, faults and strength. And it literally turned the tables on me and got me to examine myself--my capacity for understanding and love. This is truly a great film.
  • jboothmillard25 August 2007
    Warning: Spoilers
    I had seen the controversial and hard-hitting Vera Drake from director Mike Leigh, and the critics liked this film, so I decided to give it a go. There was no real plot to the story for a while, just a gentle, philosophical taxi driver named Phil (Timothy Spall) who has a dry love relationship with his partner (who works in a supermarket) Penny (Lesley Manville), their daughter Rachel (Alison Garland) is an elderly people's home cleaner, and their son son Rory (James Corden) is unemployed and aggressive. It is when Rory suffers a near-fatal heart attack that the film really gets its biggest interest (although there are moments of good chat before), and all characters are brought together to rediscover themselves. Also starring Ruth Sheen as Maureen, Marion Bailey as Carol, Paul Jesson as Ron, Sam Kelly as Sid, Kathryn Hunter as Cécile, Sally Hawkins as Samantha and Helen Coker as Donna. The actors are great, the story is human and believable, and this is just one of those films that you can't stop watching. Very good!
  • This film showcases some of the UK's finest acting talent but it is let down by it's funereal pacing and unrelenting bleakness.

    The performances by all the main characters are very strong. Timothy Spall is as reliable as ever and Lesley Manville has never been better as his partner Penny. Her face and nuances perfectly convey someone who has been bruised and battered by life and the world around her. Alison Garland is also outstanding as the daughter who is one of life's invisible people. There is a stillness and shyness about her that makes her position genuinely unsettling.

    The film has some very strong moments. When it is time for Phil (Spall) to pay his weekly charge to the Taxi firm, his search for money is genuinely moving. The way people react when they are in crisis and the stupid things people say when they are in shock are also very well drawn.

    Having said that I still walked out of this film disappointed. At 2 hrs 8 mins it is very heavy going - there is virtually no joy or optimism in this film. The film's strength is it's character observation but this has been done at the expense of plot development and it leaves us with a very one sided view of working class society.
An error has occured. Please try again.