Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    I'm surprised no one has posted commentary yet on this compelling telepic. Contrary to what some believe to be an attempt to "soften" Hitler, what this film manages to do is to add the dimension of humanity - in a most grotesque form - to the monster he was.

    Ken Stott is riveting as Hitler in his rise to infamy. Along the way, he picks up his young, vital niece, Geli (the dynamic Elaine Cassidy) who is just as headstrong and manipulative as he is - only she's sweet where he is obsessive.

    What is refreshing about this particular production is that Geli is not necessarily portrayed as Hitler's victim, but quite often his willing accomplice. She is vivacious, full of life, and love, and makes the mistake of believing she has control over him. No one controlled Hitler, and to that end this story goes.

    If there is a flaw w/ this production, it is not in the liberties it may or may not take with historical data (the DVD commentary track w/ the film's director, producer and writer reveals that painstaking turns were made in keeping as close to 'truth' as possible while still filling in gaps where no documentation exists), but in the editing of time between Hitler's past (w/ Geli) and his present (in his final days in the bunker). While there is some time line provided, there is not enough to keep the viewer from confusion during some of the later transitions, particularly those after Geli's death.

    Still, this is a compelling film w/ remarkable performances, particularly from Ken Stott but also from the two female leads, Elaine Cassidy and Christine Tremarko. The script is tightly woven w/ a bit of (BLACK) humour mixed into the otherwise overwhelming darkness that seems pervasive in all things Hitler.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This review is authentic and has NO spoilers as insinuated above. I just have a different opinion of conformist views.

    This film tries to maintain the continuity of the classic portrayal of Mr Hitler as an evil, a last longing hatred inculcated perception in the British culture as a result of the war propaganda initiated by Mr Churchill and his Focus group.

    The current revisionist historiography has already plenty of strongly convincing information to state the opposite, but writers still resource to the over publicized conventional literature – either by ignorance or self interest.

    The film making is not bad, but the story is just a naive distorted invention.

    One that goes a bit more in deep and away of the typical official misleading influence, will learn a complete different Hitler: he was a kind, truthful and just man.

    The old conformist literature refers mainly to themselves in vicious cyclical circuit, and rarely to original documents, diaries and memoirs, or cross check all the parts involved in the subject. Those books that are considered "authoritative" and original sources for the thousand of sequels, are mainly based on unverified "witnesses", the illegal Nuremberg tribunal and dubious documents.

    One needs to read Stolfi's Hitler – Beyond Evil and Tyrany to grasp a proper idea. Or David Irving's investigative books like Hitler War and Churchill War among others. Of course these are dissidents, and the media (write or left) hate them and depict them with an emotional and unreasonable criticism, and their public don't access such a literature to avoid be associated with a "negative" entity.
  • rps-217 March 2008
    I'd always considered Alec Guiness' portrayal of Hitler as the definitive one. This is as good or possibly even better. Ken Stott (never heard of him before)has caught Hitler perfectly...the gestures...the unblinking, ice cold eyes...the speaking style. He is the highlight of the film --- a masterful performance --- but everything else is excellent too. They seem to have got the uniforms and the trappings right (although Heinrich Hoffman's camera looks a little too modern for 1928.) Hitler is a difficult character to capture. But in this film it was especially difficult because in addition to the strutting "fuehrer" we also see a very different emotional side of the man. My one small criticism is that the 1928 Hitler looks too old.
  • grangeangela15 July 2020
    I really like this film and have watched it many times. I do wonder what would have happened if geli had lived and stayed with Hitler . Would things have been different