Add a Review

  • This movie is basically about two guys going around blowing stuff up in Paris. And the plot of them trying to take down a terrorist organization is just there to move the movie along because, even for films like this there has to be some sort of plot. And everything in this is nothing you haven't seen before with the explosions and gun fights and all, but something about the film just makes it pretty damn entertaining. I mean the plot with the by the book dude teaming up with a loose cannon crazy guy has been done before, but the elements of bad ass and witty and fast paced dialogue and maybe some other stuff makes it really entertaining to watch, even if the twist near the end was pretty predictable as the rest of the movie. Jonathan Rhys Meyers who plays a character that plays by the book was pretty boring and he takes up the first few couple of minutes of the movie, but when John Travolta comes in, well lets just say it's one hell of a ride. He basically plays Charlie Wax, a reckless guy that is a bit crazy but always gets things done. Just turn your brain off and enjoy this movie for what it is, not every film has to be smart to be enjoyable.

    7.5/10
  • A young spy who wants to get bigger and better jobs is partnered with an American hot head with a foul mouth and a love for violence. The mission is to stop some terrorists.

    To say I was expecting crap would be an understatement. Travolta's goofy look, a tired clichéd pairing of straight man and crazy partner, senseless action that would try to cram a plot and story in at some point. Yet, after the credits rolled, I sat there with a smile on my face. As far as spy films go, this one takes a more action heavy side. There are some cool and interesting gadgets, but I didn't get any James Bond moment.

    Travolta surprised me here too. His character was funny, bad ass at times and knew how to kick some ass. The only downside would be that I just couldn't imagine Travolta doing half of these things. He's a great character and fits perfectly with this film, but it seems a tad miscast for the action sequences. Travolta nails every other part of the role. Jonathan Rhys Meyers is the straight man to Travolta's crazy hero. This is nothing new and the film doesn't try to step around this issue. Instead it is upfront about it. It tells you exactly what you are in for when you are introduced to these characters. All it asks is for you, as a viewer, to enjoy the action and thrills this film wants to give you.

    The action is non-stop. Of course we are privy to those scenes in between where we need to move the plot along, but the film has shootouts, car chases, foot chases, rocket launchers, etc. It's handled well and I was actually able to see the action on the screen. I was never lost in the film, I knew where I was the whole time and what was being depicted. Again, that one shortfall is that we know Travolta isn't doing these action sequences, it's clearly a stuntman.

    With every spy film you know there will be some twist that someone is not who they seem to be. I was able to pick this one out right from the beginning. Again, the plot devices used in From Paris With Love are far from original, we have all seen this film before. So why bother watching it? For the chemistry between the two leads and the action sequences in a beautiful city. The city, we unfortunately, did not see enough of.

    I went in with low expectations and came out happy with the end result. I would suggest you do the same.
  • It's John Travolta like you have never seen him before. Here he is Mister Action, the ultimate Tough Guy, the new Bruce Willis but with more flair. The story itself is not particularly noteworthy. But there is lots of action as Travolta shows everyone who's boss in this action-packed special effects extravaganza. Also there is non-stop violence with Mr. Travolta leading the way. If you like movies with stories that feature nonstop violence, then this movie is for you. If you like John Travolta, this movie is for you. But in terms of the story, don't expect too much from this movie. Remember: it's a commercial product so at some point artistic merit inevitably gives way to the usual dose of special effects that Hollywood spews out like clockwork. Hooray for John Travolta and Hollywood!
  • A personal aide to the U.S. Ambassador in France, James Reese (Jonathan Rhys Meyers) has an enviable life in Paris and a beautiful French girlfriend, but his real passion is his side job as a low-level operative for the CIA. All James wants is to become a bona fide agent and see some real action. So when he's offered his first senior-level assignment, he can't believe his good luck - until he meets his new partner, special agent Charlie Wax (John Travolta)...

    From Paris With Love is an unrealistic, over-the-top action flick. The plot is extremely silly, the story quite implausible, and the action scenes are absolutely ridiculous not to mention that you can see the twist coming from the beginning.Both Travolta and Jonathan Rhys Meyers deliver good performances and they had good chemistry but at the same time their characters are paper-thin and were poorly written. Something that appalled me was the editing of the film and the transition between some scenes. I thought it was rather choppy and not something I would expect from experienced directors like Luc Besson and Pierre Morel. The film does have its moments and can be quite entertaining at times but if you're expecting something along the lines of Morel's last film, Taken, which was a well thought and realistic action-thriller then you're gonna be extremely disappointed. Recommended for action junkies only.

    6/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I actually liked From Paris with Love in the beginning. I liked seeing Meyers's character, James Reece, in his yearning to expand out of his low-brow "bubble-gum" spy techniques and reach the "big-time." Then James gets his break by escorting/babysitting fellow secret agent CRA-ZEE John "Charlie Wax" Travolta around his stationed city of Paris. Once over-the-top Charlie entered into the picture and the idea was two "Lethal Weapon" partners were obviously unwillingly thrown together, my immediate reaction was the same as any other sane person.

    Box-Office didn't actually lie this time. $24 Million should be the opening day, not the grand total of the film's (to date) release in America.

    Just as a side note: I don't consider box-office as a way to determine quality of a picture. Avatar made zillions and was below average while one of the greatest flicks of all time, Memento made pennies. People are just drawn to "advertisements" over quality for the most part, as moths to the flame.

    This, my loyal reader, is a perfect example.

    From Paris with Love was AWESOME! OK, I'll tone down the dudeness, even though this is a true dude movie. This incredibly short action flick had so much fun packed into it, and it truly began once nutzo Charlie showed up and became the "Super-Human" character I favor a lot of the time. (SEE: Officer John McClane and Jack Bauer, to name simply just two of the best.) Charlie explains to incredibly wet-behind-the-ears James why he's there in Paris, or why they have to go there…it's all clichéd action set-ups to get them from Point A to Point B to the inevitable "explosive" climax. Forget all that. Enjoy the explosions; enjoy the snappy comebacks from Travolta, including the tongue-in-cheek reference he had to another "famous" Travolta film.

    Truly, I love super-human characters, as long as I know the film is a fantasy and could never really happen. This wonderfully short – I have little patience for a movie that wants to be more than it is, silly action and then needlessly expand to over two hours – martial arts/spy/shoot-em-up throw-away is seriously attempting you to NOT take it seriously. I got the same feeling from Ninja Assassin and same reaction: Awesome, yet check-your-brain-at-the-door, fun.

    I told a friend about it at work, and being the clichéd hetero male he is, he rented it the day I told him about it. He came in the next day actually quoting it and agreeing exclusively with my enthusiasm of the film. There you go. One person agreed with me.

    Seriously, if you don't mind some, well, mind-less action with a character that can do no wrong, rarely gets hurt, is always right and down-right crazy with a touch of sarcasm (i.e. The Super-Human Character), watch From Paris With Love. It certainly won't win either an award, or a sequel, but it's so action packed and so short (a PLUS!) that despite its obvious "twists" it'll satisfy any action junkie.
  • itsparsley12 February 2010
    Pierre Morel & Luc Besson delivered one of the best action films of the last decade, Taken. Even people who typically despise the action genre were won over by it. So where do Pierre & Besson head from here? They made the move to appeal solely to the action fan base. From Paris With Love is made for genre fans, not your average movie-goer. The first 20 minutes are spent with Jonathan Rhys Meyers and it feels a little slow. Once John Travolta's character comes into the story the film takes off like a roller-coaster. His charisma gives the film an extra kick and it gives much of the action a new flavor. Once the fun starts it doesn't stop. Whenever you think this film is slowing down it's really getting ready for the next shootout. You're on the edge of your seat until the very end. Actually, one of my two complaints is the end (I won't spoil anything). Let's just say the last 5 minutes feel a little rushed. If you loved going to the theater to see Live Free Or Die Hard, Rambo, & Taken than this is for you.
  • Jonathan Rhys Meyers works for the American Embassy in Paris and is used to performing small surveillance/spying jobs. Yet he yearns to be a member of the big league: what is referred to as 'The Club' – a buzzword for elite government agents. He gets his chance when he has to go to the airport to collect a loud, foul-mouthed colleague – John Travolta in a totally unhinged performance – who's arrived in town on a drugs bust, but later uncovers a terrorist plot. Cue: lots of witty banter, beatings and shootings galore as a reluctant Rhys Meyer's gets in over his head with his apparently unstable partner.

    As you can tell from the above short outline, if you're watching this thinking you're in for a soppy love story, you'd better brace yourself for the truth: this is a violent, foul-mouthed, headache inducing shoot 'em up. It's a simple action story where – stop me if you haven't heard this before – two mismatched agents argue and bitch the entire time while spouting witty dialog at each other. But don't let that put you off: this is a deliriously entertaining buddy movie in the mold of Lethal Weapon, The Last Boy Scout and a host of others, but with an added European flavor which serves to make it stand out from the crowd.

    For a flashy, big budget movie, it's refreshingly old school. There's no dizzy 3D on display and whatever CG is present is so subtle as to be almost undetectable. In fact this movie could have been made in the late 80s/early 90s. What we get in their place is a movie that relies on the characters talking to each other rather than relying on big effects. This is like a breath of fresh air. Travolta and Rhys Meyers work really well together and are believable as the two mismatched agents: one a nervy and green rookie with no experience, the other a seasoned pro that tends to shoot first and then ask his questions. The script is very witty and there's lots of entertaining back and forth banter between the two of them.

    Travolta is his typically over-the-top self in the movie - but in a good way. At times he's laugh-out-loud hilarious and puts in an energetic comedic performance. He's seems to relish the outrageous situations and the witty dialog. He runs through his familiar back catalog of high pitched 'Yeahs' and whoops and an assortment of swear words that wouldn't have been out of place in Pulp Fiction. In fact the aforementioned movie is even referenced in a throwaway line where he mentions that his favorite food is a 'Royale with cheese'. You know that an actor's recent output hasn't been of the highest quality when he has to remind us of former glories not just once, but twice: did he really think we didn't catch it the first time? Rhys Meyers is good as his straight faced, though bewildered sidekick and underplays his role to good effect. Admittedly, he has no other choice since he's playing to such a powerhouse role as Travolta's. It's clearly Travolta's show and he loves every minute of it. And why wouldn't he? This gives him the chance to play one of his most colorful characters in years.

    There are lots of really good classic scenes in this movie, perhaps too many to mention: the airport interrogation room, a scene set in a Chinese restaurant and an encounter with street punks, to name just a few. The movie is brimming with entertaining moments and moves along at a breathless pace, effortlessly sweeping us in with it. So much so, in fact, that we fail to notice how… slightly… confusing… it… is… It's fair to say that this movie doesn't have your standard A-B-C plotting. Story-wise, it is - as they say - all over the shop. Still, when you're having this much fun that doesn't really matter.

    It's a shame they couldn't have come up with a better title for the movie because the one they chose doesn't do it justice. While it works in the context of its Parisian setting, it may put people off. The unacquainted could unwittingly pass it up, thinking it's something else entirely. And that would be a shame because this is a highly entertaining and re-watchable gem of a movie with rapid-fire dialog and lots of preposterous situations thrown in for good measure. It's also got its share of surprises and twists. If you like witty buddy cop movies, then go out and see this, if for nothing else, then just to see Travolta back on top of his game in loud, dynamic form.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    From Paris With Love is a very good example of a film that is improbable & at times ridiculous,BUT moves at such a fast pace,you do not have time to realize this.

    There are many shoot outs, some explosions, great chase scenes & much humor. It is also very foul mouthed but when John Travolta uses these words, It is not objectionable

    Most of you know I normally can not tolerate this language,as I stated, the scenes go so fast did not mind it.

    Luc Besson wrote the original story & co-produced, Pierre More3 directed. The production is first rate,

    John Travolta & Jonathan Rhys Meyers, make a fine team.

    This is the type film we used to see all the time. Granted they did not use any foul words back then, Improbable stories that move so fast the audience does not pay that much attention to the stupidity.

    See this as an action packed violent comedy, sit back & enjoy.

    Ratings: *** (out of 4) 87 points (out of 100) IMDb 8 (out of 10)
  • While there is no shortage of people jockeying for position in line to condemn Luc Besson, there's no denying the entertainment of his action movies. Over the past ten years the man has given us Kiss of the Dragon, the Transporter franchise, and Taken. These movies will never be up for any major awards but they are still worth the money and time for action fans.

    Jonathan Rhys-Meyers plays James Reese, the personal assistant to the American Ambassador in France who does odd, low-level covert jobs on the side. He longs for the big leagues, and gets his wish (to the extreme) when he's suddenly partnered with the flamboyant Charlie Wax (an OTT John Travolta, who really seems to be enjoying himself). Wax has a mission in Paris, but he's keeping the full details from Reese, gradually letting him further into the tangle of twists as the elaborate story unfolds. Racking up a body count of more than one an hour in the process.

    The Travolta/Meyers double-act mostly pays off, but, like Reese, the audience is left out in the cold for the duration. Meyers doesn't do much but stand aside while Travolta rampages through posses of bad guys. I know he's the 'everyman' we can identify with, thus giving us a smoother insight into the world of espionage, but if he was just given a tiny bit more to do than stand around wide-eyed and frightened the film would have gotten a higher rating from me.

    As 90-minute fluff we're talking serious entertainment here. If you're wanting more profound film-making look elsewhere (not that Besson is incapable of this either). From Paris With Love doesn't rewrite the rules of the action or spy genre, but it does play every expected note loudly and maniacally. Exactly how many films have a bald, goatee-sporting John Travolta hanging out of a car window talking on the phone in one hand with a giant mofo rocket-launcher in the other?
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I can't stand it when people start bashing an action comedy (yes, that's what the flick is!!) for being unrealistic or not politically correct!! If you wanted something realistic, then stick to the news channels on TV or the COPS show... and if you wanted a politically correct "information" then... well, just read the mainstream European media where they avoid mentioning the ethnic background of the perpetrators although you should be blind and/or completely ignorant not to notice who they usually are! It was quite a tragic coincidence that few days before I saw the film, two Muslim women from Chechenia blew themselves up in the Moscow subway - a fact that gave a bitter connotation to a twist in the film I would rather not elaborate on. When I go to a film like this, I expect funny dialogs, improbable but entertaining scenes plus a storyline that is not hard to follow - and guess what, all these ingredients were there. Sure, the last part of the story pushed my suspension of disbelief way past its limits and reminded me of comic books for 8 year old boys but hey, nobody's perfect... Definitely fun to watch.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is a high-octane action movie filled with a high body count. Pierre Morel directs Jonathan Rhys-Meyers as James Reece, a low-level intelligence agent in Paris with a cushy job, but with dreams of getting into the real action in the field. The agency gives him his chance to prove himself by assigning him to team with a crazed uncouth operative Charlie Wax(John Travolta)in busting up a terrorist plot that may lead to a high profile assassination. Reece must trust Wax just in order to protect his own life.

    Travolta is the out-of-the-box character you can't help but like. Fearless, ruthless and volatile. Rhys-Meyers is a believable less trained sidekick. I've been interested in him ever since his spot-on portrayal of Elvis Presley in the 2005 CBS mini-series Elvis. When the action gets started it is quick, often and violent. The story has no trouble keeping you occupied. The cast also features: Kasia Smutniak, Richard Durden, Bing Yin, Eric Gordon and Amber Rose Revah.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Wildly inventive and a whole lot of fun, 'From Paris with Love' is a roller-coaster ride from start to end-credits. The delectable (and boy, is he delicious?) Jonathan Rhys Myers plays straight man to John Travolta's manic, off-the-wall character. The script is funny and has some great throwaway lines ('Wax on, Wax off', 'Ka-fucking-BOOM!') , including a sly reference to Pulp Fiction that movie-buffs will love! John Travolta and Jonathan Rhys myers have so much fun with their respective roles that the plot is actually irrelevant to the running, shooting and exploderising that is going on. Don' t think about it, just sit back and enjoy!
  • kosmasp19 October 2010
    And it does do that quite a lot. Story? Believable action/human beings? Don't bother looking for them here. Because if you do bother, than you will be more than disappointed, as many reviews have shown here. Don't think this is another Leon either. This is far removed from Leon. And don't read too much into the nationalities of the characters, if that is possible.

    After all this is just a movie. An action movie at that. And it does deliver on exactly that. Now maybe John Travolta wouldn't have been my first choice for the lead, maybe our lead man could've been better "fleshed" out. Maybe there are a few coincidences too much. But do you really care, if the action is shot as good as this? That comes down to your taste I guess. But you have been "warned" and you should know what you're letting yourself into.

    Don't expect anything this isn't (I have to admit, the first time I heard the title, I thought this would be a romantic comedy, though it is reminiscent of Bond movies ... don't compare it to them either!) and there is a chance you will enjoy this very much (if it is your cup of tea of course).
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Im a big action movie fan and not normally a fan of John Travolta but after seeing the trailer for From Paris With Love, I thought ''Wow, that looks awesome!''. I was right, it was. I really enjoyed Taken (with Liam Neeson) which was directed by Pierre Morel, and thought this would be similar and therefore very exciting and enjoyable. Morel's breakneck directing style was perfect for Taken and adds to the flow of the movie.

    Whereas Liam Neeson is a father hunting for a kidnapped daughter in Taken, Travolta plays CIA Agent Charlie Wax and is a completely crazy, old fashioned gung-ho American secret agent who shoots first and asks questions later. He's teamed with a Paris based, chess playing aide to the US Ambassador called Reese (played by Jonathan Rys Meyers), who, while he wants to see more 'action' in his job, is shocked by his new partner's 'unorthadox methods' in taking down a terrorist cell who intend to blow up visiting US delegates. Travolta is completely OTT in this movie, and looks like he had a blast making it. When Wax arrives in Paris, Reese picks him up from the airport then its straight to the action, as Wax kills a restaurant full of Chinese cocaine dealers, then moves on to the head of the Chinese criminals, killing a warehouse full of henchmen sent to get him. Wax and Reese then move on to Pakistani money-laundering pimps, with Wax killing dozens of them in a run-down apartment building, all while finding time to take cocaine on the Eiffel Tower and have sex with a French hooker while staking out the bad guys. When they finally find out who is behind the terror plot, there is a nice plot twist which keeps the action flowing. Reese is just a passenger as Wax racks up one of the biggest body counts i can ever remember in an action movie.

    This movie is very old school, similar to a lot of action-packed Stallone, Schwarzenegger or Chuck Norris movies, where really the plot is secondary and its a showcase for the awesome Travolta. It's just non-stop blast 'em and work it out later, which is fine by me and I really enjoyed it but general audiences would probably reject such machismo in this day an age, which is strange as 2010 seems to be some kind of 80's revival movie-wise with remakes and action films by the bucket load. The plot is simplistic and not much thought is required but the target audience are not going to see this to hear Shakespearian dialogue! It's fast paced, violent, edge of your seat stuff and quite funny (thanks to Travolta). I would love to see a sequel or see it become a franchise. I am already imagining how awesome it would be to see something like From Moscow With Love or From London With Love, which hopefully the producers and Travolta think too. From Paris With Love is the best action film of the year to date, but with Sly's Expendable's and The new A-Team on the way in the summer, it will have competition but it made my day. Action fans will love it, other's not so much...
  • Warning: Spoilers
    An efficient employee to an UN Ambassador in Paris, James Reece(Jonathan Rhys Meyers) moonlights as a low-level agent(..obeying the commands sent to them through messages on his cell phone), hoping for his opportunity to become a legitimate worker in the field, getting his chance as the partner to a very unpredictable American "assassin", Charlie Wax(John Travolta) who is called on to eliminate a terrorist network. He conducts his business in a very aggressive, but proficient, way, leaving plenty of dead bodies behind him.

    This movie, presented by Luc Besson based on his own story, has your basic terrorist plot, with the appeal being the odd pairing of corporate suit hotshot Reece, and the rather dynamic Wax, who often surprises his young protégé by shooting many people in the head, afterward explaining his methods in detail as action commences.

    It's Travolta's turn as the one-man-army, getting to use a hand gun, machine guns, C4 explosives, and a missile launcher. Wax is very skilled in the art of killing(..and leaving a lot of damaged property)while Reece often looks rather dazed and taken aback by how violent scenarios escalate in an instant. Wax may look and behave like a wiry loose cannon, but he always has an answer to every move he makes..it all shows he has prepared and studied his targets, knowing who and where they are. We get an idea as to how effective this covert cloak-and-dagger organization really is, through constant contact with outside resources always channeling information back and forth as to what steps to take next.

    Some mighty fine action set pieces including shootouts in a Chinese restaurant, a mannequin factory, and a street slum terrorist cell located in an apartment complex. There's an exciting car chase as Wax and his driver follow in hot pursuit behind a terrorist with plans to encounter an American consulate, his vehicle bomb-heavy. During this key car chase, Wax spends a lot of the time hanging outside a window with a missile launcher, trying to lock his target in his sights before the terrorist achieves his ultimate goal. Travolta is both playful and vulgar as Wax, a man who is very blunt and honest, not one to mince words when it comes to his job. I think a film such as this always works when we can gauge the rookie's response to his professional counterpart's ways of handling situations which often end with buildings blown apart, people gunned down, and cars exploding.

    A development in the plot regarding Reece's fiancé is the emotional arc of the film, and it creates a major problem which changes his world forever.

    The film, from the director of TAKEN, provides plenty of street gangs, dope-pushers, and Pakistani terrorists for Travolta to obliterate, an innumerable amount of corpses left in his wake. Travolta's stuntman was put to work in this movie as Wax slides across tables and down rooftops, not to mention constantly dodging bullets aimed his direction, walls and windows the ultimate victim. Travolta even gets to take apart a gang of Paris Asian hoods using their own weapons against them! From Paris with Love sets up Reece's life, and once he meets Wax, it takes off, never catching a breath. Wax, barely in Paris five minutes, induces his altercation with cocaine smugglers, has Reece collect some of the product in a Chinese vase, and moves through the city at an intense pace. The plot may be rather unspectacular, but the action is almost non-stop..even a seemingly festive dinner erupts in an outburst of violence.
  • The assistant of the American Ambassador in Paris James Reece (Jonathan Rhys Meyers) is an aspirant spy working in minor jobs for the CIA. James lives with his fiancée Caroline (Kasia Smutniak) and expects to be promoted to the special operations. When James is assigned to drive the unconventional but efficient agent Charlie Wax (John Travolta) in Paris, James learns that a terrorist cell is preparing to attack the American delegation and he is close to the key element that will explode the group of representatives of his government.

    "From Paris with Love" is an explosive collection of clichés with a predictable story. There are scenes supposed to be funny that do not work and there is nothing new in the plot. The good thing is the gorgeous unknown actress Kasia Smutniak. My vote is four.

    Title (Brazil): "Dupla Implacável" ("Implacable Double")
  • I wasn't expecting much when I sat down to watch 'From Paris with love' this evening, I bought the DVD for a couple of quid recently and I already knew from looking on here that it had been a Box-office disaster on its theatrical release a couple of years ago and that critics had been anything but kind, but damn it I loved it.

    I'm not a fan of Travolta, which was the main reason I hadn't seen the film till now, but I was pleasantly surprised as his role as the unpredictable special agent Charlie Wax IMHO is one of his best. Jonathan Rhys Meyers is pretty wooden as expected but he didn't really need to be any great shakes for the role he took on, he fitted in well as the Chess playing aide to the U.S. Ambassador whose desperate to get a job he can really get his teeth into.

    Outrageous action and explosions, plenty of violence (most of it unexpected) - with a very high body count, this is the type of Film that Luc Besson does very well. Great locations and Cinematography, and very important for Films of the genre - It's fast moving and never boring. There have been rumours of a possible sequel, but given the poor Box office returns, that, for the moment at least seems unlikely
  • Troy_Campbell20 February 2010
    After Pierre Morel delivered the surprise smash Taken a couple of years ago it is no wonder he has been given another chance to strike box office gold. He certainly hasn't held back, throwing everything including the kitchen sink at making his follow up as enjoyable and adrenaline pumping as everyone is expecting it to be. He very nearly succeeds. Whilst it features some ambitious set pieces – a fist fight with a rowdy gang and a multi-storey shootout against drug-dealing terrorists stand out as two of the best – laugh out loud gags and a humorous tongue-in-cheek performance by Travolta, From Paris will alienate half the audience who saw Taken due to its over-the-top, comic book approach which can sometimes be hard to indulge. If you can lower your IQ, look past the nonsensical plot and take the outlandish action for what it is, you may find yourself smiling more than you would care to admit.

    Don't let the throwaway Bond title misguide you, there is no handsome spy, futuristic gadgets or cartoonish villains on offer here. There are two elements that share a commonality with the 007 franchise though: nonstop one-liners and henchmen who just can't shoot to save themselves. Both are dispatched with effortless ease and calm control by the adroit Charlie Wax - who comes complete with self-appointed catchphrase "wax on, wax off." However Wax is so far removed from Ian Fleming's famous spy it's much easier to compare him to the scoundrels Bond has faced off against: he has the hairless dome of Blofeld, the hefty frame of Goldfinger, the love of firearms like Scaramanga and the impetuousness of Xenia Onatopp. It's credit to the ageing Travolta that we still root for Wax a hundred percent of the way.

    That leaves "The Tudors" star Johnathan Rhys Meyers to play the thankless straight role of by-the-book, Cambridge educated James Reece. Different is an understatement when describing what kind of star Meyers is; he always has a sinister appearance even if that is not the intention and charisma doesn't exactly ooze out of him like it does from your Brad Pitts or Shia LeBeoufs. But he has carved out a neat little resume over the last decade and deserves this, his first lead in a bona fide Hollywood blockbuster.

    Big. Dumb. Fun.

    3 out of 5 (1 - Rubbish, 2 - Ordinary, 3 - Good, 4 - Excellent, 5 - Classic)
  • Just as how Milkyway and Johnnie To in Asia has churned out films with that indistinguishable Hong Kong crime noir flavor, I look at Europa Corp and Luc Besson in Europe with something of a similar eye, being somewhat of a fan of their action films of late, especially when Besson has some involvement either in production, story or directing that rare film these days.

    One can imagine the kind of cinematic mayhem created with Pierre Morel directing a Luc Besson story, which the last combination had resulted in the action packed thriller Taken. With From Paris with Love, this formula again delivered where it mattered – high octane action that never lets up from the get go, especially when we have the casting of John Travolta as a loose canon live wire who was probably schooled and skilled iin the same clandestine network as Liam Neeson's Bryan Mills from Taken, except that he cracks more jokes, uses methods that are a lot more over the top unorthodox, but similarly dispatches opponents with deadly force and without remorse.

    In some ways this is like the rebooted James Bond, where we follow diplomat James Reece (Jonathan Rhys Meyers) who is yearning for a more adventurous tour of duty for his country other than serving in the US Embassy in Paris, planning the itinerary of the Ambassador. He gets that all important call one day to do just that, except that he finds himself stuck in an extremely strange on job training with the best in the cloak and daggers business, Travolta's Charlie Wax. Before he can even settle down for a meal, they get into fire fights after fire fights, from restaurants to dilapidated built up areas, touring sites like the Eiffel Tower, to staking out from a run down brothel, all in the name of taking down drug dealers, or so it seems. Reece had asked for a license which is more than what he can handle, and has to fulfil his duty to the country while learning an important lesson in his occupation that would make Bond just as proud, and probably put his arms around and empathize with.

    Morel again demonstrates that he's top dog in the action flick business now, knowing when to push your level of adrenaline to a higher level, and keeping it there throughout the set action sequences, be it balletic pistol shoot outs, or a meandering freeway chase at top speed. Like how the metaphor of chess playing get thrown around from time to time in the narrative, Morel plays the narrative out like a chess game, one step at a time and always having one party being one step ahead, until the ultimate checkmate.

    With our recent diplomatic immunity spat, this film delves into just how much mayhem a diplomatic pass can dish out, from bypassing security screenings, behaving like a complete jerk and getting away with it, and of course, bringing about complete and utter chaos with an ever increasing body count with nary a question asked by a single cop. The dynamic duo here walks around as if nothing has happened, that in some ways may feel heavy handed that only the American clandestine network is capable of taking down the bad guys anywhere in the world, without giving too hoots about sovereignty especially France which they had bailed out twice in two world wars.

    For those who enjoy the bickering-buddy movie, then From Paris With Love is your automatic choice, especially when Travolta steals the show with his mean looks of a bald head and a goatee, thrash talking and punishing his prey at the same time without breaking a single bead of sweat. Heck, he even comes with his own bag of high tech toys to keep the tech junkie happy that he's not just all brawn but some brains as well. What more, I can't laugh harder than when a sly reference managed to find itself inserted into the film which jibed at Travolta's Vincent Vega role from Pulp Fiction which talked about a certain food franchise observation. Jonathan Rhys Meyer's character looks more the whiner than a decent partner for Wax, and this turns out to be the cursory character development to make its way to the story.

    But the film is far from perfect and lacking that killer instinct that Morel's Taken delivered, and fell for the ultra conventional finale monologue that wouldn't fly if this had tried to be a tad more realistic. Still, action fans are likely to get their bang for the buck. Recommended!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie is literally one wild ride from the beginning to end and leaves little time for you to stop and catch your breath. It is purely an action movie with characters that are in a league of their own (though I wouldn't exactly call them well defined as this is an action movie and not really meant to have any literary value). However, the plot does twist, and events that occur at the beginning of the film suddenly reveal their purpose as the film progresses (such as why James Reece spends half the movie carting a vase full of cocaine around Paris).

    One could describe this as a coming of age type film, but it doesn't really work like that. It isn't a teenager being given his first taste of adult life, but rather a young diplomat who really wants to become an undercover operative, and is given a chance to prove his worth. Charlie Wax is probably more stereotypical than not (though I must admit that John Travolta does play his quite well). Wax is a typical operative who does things his own way, and not strictly by the book, but he gets things done. Reece is very much a buy the book type of guy, but he is thrown in with Wax to see that doing things strictly by the book is not the best way of getting things done.

    A lot of things are hidden from the viewer at the beginning of the film, and it only starts to be revealed as the film progresses. I won't say too much about the plot because it will destroy the value of a very good film (though I have given a little bit too much away with regards to the vase full of cocaine). In a sense it could be considered a tour of Paris, but not the parts of Paris that your average tourist would visit (and the only part of Paris that I visited that was in the movie was the Eifel Tower, or that is at least what I can remember).

    Yes, this is a spy movie, but it is a spy movie full of action. It is not your typical Bourne Identity or James Bond type of spy movie. There are machine gun fights galore, explosions, and car chases. I guess the only thing that makes this film a spy movie is the fact that it has spies in it. I guess that I all I really want to say about this film because any more will simply give too much away. Oh, before I go, they do have the Royale with Cheese in Paris, though it is not a Big Mac (they have them as well).
  • Warning: Spoilers
    James Reece has an enviable life in Paris and a beautiful French girlfriend, but his real passion is his side job as a low-level operative for the CIA.

    All James wants is to become a bona fide agent and see some real action. So when he's offered his first senior-level assignment, he can't believe his good luck until he meets his new partner, special agent Charlie Wax - a trigger-happy, wisecracking, loose cannon who's been sent to Paris to stop a terrorist attack.

    Wax leads James on a white-knuckle shooting spree through the Parisian underworld that has James praying for his desk job.

    But when James discovers he's a target of the same crime ring they're trying to bust, he realises there's no turning back...and that Wax himself might be his only hope for making it through the next forty-eight hours alive....

    This film is from the creators of Taken, but this movie couldn't be so far from that movie in so many ways. If you like Travolta circa Face/off and Swordfish, then you are in for a real treat. He puts in his most maniacal performance as Wax, who will probably be the screens biggest anti-hero this year.

    Travolta chews the scenery and commands every scene he is in, leaving poor Rhys-Meyers with very little to do, apart from carry the one little bit of story that this film tries to hold.

    It's one of those films that you are either going to love or really really hate with a passion. I for reasons unknown to myself really enjoyed this, and it kind of reminded me of the good old fashioned action movies of the eighties that never took themselves seriously and had more balls than the PG-13 ones we all know and hate now.

    Well this film has found it's balls, and holds them proudly in its hands. For every silly set piece, there is an even sillier line, for every explosion, we have Travoltas child like Wax doing Kung Fu and even Parkour (yes, he does Parkour).

    It's silly, loud confusing, but never dull, and every character and situation ends up with a silly punchline. It's fantastic stuff, with a decent ending, and a very cool nod to Pulp Fiction that has been blown out of proportion on this site (it's so insignificant).

    But if you liked this film as much as i did, don't be surprised to find someone who loathes this film.

    The ultimate Marmite of cinema.
  • neil-4763 March 2010
    Warning: Spoilers
    What a load of old tosh! Inexperienced operative Reece is paired up with thunderous psycho agent Charlie Wax, which means that he follows him round Paris (carrying a large jar full of cocaine) while Wax shoots lots and lots of people. I mean, lots and lots. An average of about one per hour, we're told.

    This is what I tend to think of as a video game movie - not so much a plot as a series of obstacles to be overcome (in this case, shot) in the course of moving from one short-term objective to the next. It all seems complicated, but it isn't - the business with the Chinese and the cocaine, for instance, is largely irrelevant to what turns out to be the story.

    There is a twist which will surprise some but not all.

    Travolta is in hilarious over-the-top scenery chewing mode. Jonathan Rhys Meyer, sporting an ill advised "moustache" and "beard" looks barely old enough to shave.

    The action is fun, and of the many many people killed, most of them have no emotional resonance at all - they are spear carriers whose sole purpose is to be killed.

    Utterly daft, completely implausible, it passes the time cheerfully enough, and isn't a patch on Morel's previous film Taken.
  • You never know what you are going to get. With From Paris with Love, you see two distinctly different marketing strategies. One set of trailers and TV spot bills it as a hard-boiled action flick, with Travolta unleashing a fury of bullets. The other focuses on the much lesser known Jonathan Rhys-Meyers as he deals with the comedic situations placed on him through the Travolta character. If you can go in with an open mind, you'll see that both approaches ring true for better or worse.

    Our story starts with a long dose of James Reece (Jonathan Rhys Meyers). He's the personal aid to the U.S Ambassador to France. Known for book smarts, his side task of spying for his country affords him the opportunity to place bugs and switch plates. At his flat, his girlfriend Caroline (Kasia Smutniak) has to deal with being kept in the dark. When the opportunity for more dangerous work presents itself, Reece is given a partner in the form of Charlie Wax (John Travolta). Wax is a fast-talking, trigger-happy, manic whose order to do as he pleases may just be too much for Reece.

    The two J's make for a great team. On one end you have Reece leading the audience into the underground world of mayhem while trying to keep his wits about him. On the other there is the everyman's adrenaline junkie who may not be too old just yet. And for what it's worth, in a throwaway action flick, there's a genuine sense of fun in the air. However, the emphasis on mindless chaos puts a damper on the mood. There are numerous moments where the pace hiccups all the way to 11. I sure would have appreciated a briefing of sorts instead of a simple kill everyone mentality. Even with the agenda to smite the terrorists, there is an explosive moment near the end that exists for zero narrative purpose. Maybe Wax was having so much fun flirting with diegetic sound that he forgot to fire his bazooka, opting instead to save it for a more dramatic moment. You just can't have the kill happy hero abort and purse a target at the same time.

    From the director of Taken, Pierre Morel, comes a tale based on a short story from Luc Besson. I'm not sure what that's going to mean to the average moviegoer, whether you factor in Morel's short resume at the helm or the sporadic nature of Besson's screenplays. What I saw from a crew standpoint was a throwback to the '80s and '90s action genre. Gun use doesn't provoke bullet-time effects. You can bet Travolta has a stunt double. Most importantly you can understand what's happening during the fights. I can't even count how many films edit around the action these days to the point that you have no honest idea of who's still standing. If you are sick of The Dark Knight method of shooting fists juxtaposed with fallen bodies, From Paris with Love will be a good movie for you.

    Wax is a character that is unfortunately placed in the narrative's backseat. To better understand what I'm talking about, look at Lethal Weapon. In that film the two cop buddies have a developed background. We see their homes, we see Murtaugh's family and Riggs' dog. Well in From Paris with Love the only character you get to know the history of or see the private love of is Reece. At 92 minutes, there certainly could have been time allotted to explore Wax, but the screenplay shuns it. Maybe some time to cool down with his side of life would have helped reduce the jerky pacing. Man, I feel the love for you Paris but I'm not sure that I'm getting it back.
  • mr-paladin26 March 2010
    Please be gentle, this is my first review.

    First of all, Travolta is back! Since Pulp Fiction, where I really enjoyed his play, I always had the feeling that his acting was about skin-deep. What happened in this movie is an invention of a new old-school action hero which would have stood in one line with Willis, Stallone and Schwarzenegger without trying to be one of them. He's powerful, funny and seriously "true" without being ridiculously over-torqued like in Pelham 123 or Face-off.

    Basically you need to enjoy old-school action movies to like this. The storyline must have come to the writers mind while brushing his teeth in the morning - It's solid, well grounded, but a little bit too compressed for a 90 min movie. Concerning the speed of this movie, the camera work is fantastic and the cut allows to enjoy the action at it's fullest. (In the last years there were many movies of this type with a cut/camera like a flip-book with missing pages, which made them completely unenjoyable.)

    I would like to see more movies of this type in the next years. It's not pretending to be more than what it is: Solid "hero-action" with a proper sidekick.
  • Lots of exploding cars, a hundred people or so get killed, many mown down in hails of gunfire, blood spatters all over people's faces, drugs, terrorists, it's all in there in a great hodgepodge of nothingness. This film is said to be based on a story by Luc Besson. I'd keep that quiet if I were Besson, as it's nothing to be proud of. The lead role is played by John Revolta, who is unspeakably hideous to look at and as usual unremittingly disgusting, vulgar, and obscene. If that's your thing, well … by the way it's in English and we don't see much of Paris besides some badly-shot footage from inside a moving car, and a few stock shots with the Eiffel Tower in the background (for those who can't read five-letter words beginning with P, the name of a capital city in France, uhhhh…..)
An error has occured. Please try again.