User Reviews (465)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    (Flash Review)

    A young couple with an infant child has a fraternity buy a house for sale next door. Cue immature comedy scenarios of both 'parties' not getting along because of, you guessed it, rambunctious 'parties' – zing! This is moderately more funny if you are a parent as you have the perspectives of: wish I could go out and live it up but I can't because I have an infant at home and let's be cool with the young neighbors because even though we are older, we are still cool. Lewd humor, scheming and substance abuse ensues. Who will get the last laugh? The end. It has some funny gags, many bad jokes and a plausibly core story as a foundation for the humor. It was OK and better than many current teen-focused comedies.
  • Floated23 July 2015
    Neighbors plays as a typical Seth Rogen meets Zac Efron comedy. Its demographic double play aside, Neighbors is very good at blending its two kinds of comedy, frathouse and new-parent angst together into a tight and consistently funny package. The film draws connections between the two house, new parents Mac and Kelly Radner (Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne) secretly crave their old wild lives, while the boys at Delta Psi look at their brotherhood as a sort of stable home environment.

    Neighbors at first seems to string along many unconnected pieces then eventually we see he first connection come along and start to process as the film goes along. It is a silly comedy and many of the negative reviews seem to have complaints about this. It isn't trying to be a masterpiece or anything special but what t does, it works and there are a specific audience for these kinds of comedy.
  • hooglande416 May 2014
    Warning: Spoilers
    well, this is my first review so don't be too harsh with me. I watched this movie a few days ago and I went to the movie theater with high expectations because of the fairly good rating (7,4 at the time of watching). But boy was I wrong. The story was nowhere near original, the acting felt wrong as if everything was improvised and the worst aspect: the jokes were only occasionally funny. I guess a lot of people in the movie theater shared this opinion since it was awkwardly silent at parts where you were supposed to laugh. I really missed someone hilarious like Steve Stifler in the American Pie movies whose quotes would stick around. For your money you get a dull comedy with lame jokes that you will most likely have forgotten the next day. Save your time and your well deserved cash and don't visit this one. Unless you find it funny when a baby eats a used condom. I'll give it a generous two because I did laugh two or three times.

    2/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It is sad to see Rogen prostituting himself for money. I saw him in the 2011 "Take This Waltz" in a non-comedic role and he was excellent. But most of his roles are like the one here, sophomoric and dirty humor that is only humorous to the younger crowd that likes dirty humor.

    Here he is Mac Radner, an office worker, with wife Rose Byrne as Kelly Radner. They also have a small child, a girl not quite one year old. They banter at home and it is usually sex talk, and it isn't funny at all.

    As fate would have it, otherwise the name of the movie would be different, their new "neighbors" are a fraternity house that likes to party hard, loud, and late into the early morning hours. The president of that frat is Zac Efron as Teddy Sanders. Actually Efron is the only partially saving grace for this movie.

    So the story is mostly about the neighbors battling the frat boys to restore some peace and quiet in the neighborhood. Unless you are a kid who relishes this kind of attempt at loud and dirty humor, most thinking adults will find their time totally wasted on this mess.
  • isaacch-9991730 June 2016
    7/10
    funny
    This is a typical , silly , American comedy. Its not the best of movies , but it is funny.If you are into comedies , I recommend this film strongly. Having said this, it only has a specific humor that wont be every bodies cup of tea. It wont appeal to all audiences and has a lot of bad language ( take in account it is a restricted movie )Despite all of this it is a witty and funny comedy worth watching for a good laugh. It will probably be a classical comedy in years to come. Apart from the great cast,there is nothing special about this movie really. There is nothing that makes it better than other comedies. All in all, its an entertaining light hearted film. Whether you like the humor or not, that is down to the individual watching.
  • Like most comedies these days, most of the funny parts were given away in the trailer. Unlike some of the wet blankets posting comments about this movie, I did actually get a couple of laughs from this one. I liked Rose Byrne and her character. I was not very familiar with her. I saw Bridesmaids, but Ms. Byrne did not register with me for some reason. Seth Rogen can deadpan these lines okay. Yes, much of the humor is smutty or scatological, which is largely not my cup of tea, but what else can one expect these days, particularly from a mass market vehicle? I cannot really recommend this film, but it is, I guess, okay. I have definitely seen worse.
  • Neighbors: this one I actually watched with my parents, and if you've seen this movie, you'll understand why that could get kind of weird. There was really great moments to this film, and honestly it's here more because I just really liked a lot of the films of 2014. The dildo making fundraiser and the insane parties are part of what make this movie hilarious, and it's definitely one watching. Probably better with a group of friends then your family, but either way, this ones good, and gets 7ish. If you guys want more in depth reviews, please be sure to check me out, Quinn C with the James Bond emblem, on YouTube. I do daily videos reviewing films of old and new, and also give very in depth analysis of the James Bond films. So if you enjoyed and/or appreciated this review, please be sure to check me out at Quinn C on YouTube with the James Bond emblem, thanks
  • Neighbors is one of those hate it or love it titles. Many people dislike this type of comedy calling it stupid and pointless. While I quite enjoy serious and high-quality movies, sometimes I just want to lay on the couch and watch 90 minutes of high-quality stupid things that just make me laugh a lot. Neighbors is just this type of movie - sit back, relax and just have a laugh - not everything we watch has to be a life-changing experience.

    As far as actors go I think everybody did their work great. Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne have a great chemistry and really make all the scenes work. Do not let yourself be fooled by the low rating here - Neighbors is a good comedy with loads of funny moments that would not let you get bored while watching it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Okay, first of all I'd like to state that I rarely review films because I tend to think IMDb does a great job giving people a general picture of how good/bad a movie is, and the mixed reviews tend to allow for a pretty balanced perspective. But what the f-bombing f-bomb is going on here?

    I went through pretty much 5 pages of 1/10 reviews of this film and then I just exploded with frustration. I had to interrupt this copycat streak. It goes to show that it's in peoples nature follow the herd and if they see enough negativity they'll convince themselves that's how it is.

    This movie is obviously not targeted at the old people writing these reviews, nor the young people following their lead to appear "intelligent" or whatever they're trying to achieve. Since when is multiple usage of the f-bomb a plausible reason to dislike a movie? I am in complete shock.

    I watched this movie sober, late at night, by myself and I laughed out loud a multitude of times and I rarely laugh when I watch comedies alone even if I find them funny.

    The dialogue was f-bombing hilarious, witty and extremely clever. The much used f-word adds authenticity and flavor in an comically exaggerated scenario. I personally use the word (almost) equally much in casual conversations with my friends. Obviously things are exaggerated though, otherwise you'd be making a documentary.

    Based on all these negative reviews, I guess you could say that many fail to realize and appreciate when things are intentionally lame and intensionally exaggerated to the point when it almost doesn't make sense, but since it is intentional it in fact does make sense. The movie makes use of a lot of satirical elements and is in a sense is making fun of people who doesn't get this type of humor. I, for one, love Seth Rogen and personally think this is one of his best. "The Hangover" which is praised by so many people for example, I re-watched it the other day and holy s-bomb is that humor outdated. I did not even smile. Zach is good, but unfortunately it's been used to the point where I want to vomit. THAT is a stupid movie, this movie is actually made by someone who's so intelligent most people don't even get it and render it stupid and immature. Humour is evolving as quickly as technology, and like 9GAG, if you're not active or within that atmosphere many of the jokes will be almost impossible to grasp or seem extremely lame, but lame is the game. This (in my opinion) is a very small piece of the dawn of a new era of humor. If I could define this movie I would call it a comically exaggerated satire of both early marriage, frat life and friendship. The message is there, but I guess a lot of people get scared off by the constant swearing and profanity to look past it and not take it so f-bombing serious.

    I loved this movie and it scares me to see that the average reviewer is on an intensely different page, and has failed to take the movie for what it is. I'm with the critics on this one.

    10/10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Overall: I personally thought the movie was very funny, however the humour will definitely not be for everyone.

    Good: Zac Efron and Dave Franco have great chemistry as do Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne. Seth's friend, Ike Barinholtz, is also a fun and interesting character. The idea is pretty cool although I am not entirely sure it is original. The cinematography was decent and, for me, it was consistently funny from start to end. Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne act pretty well.

    Bad: Sadly, I think the rest of the cast's acting was just sub-par. Nothing to do with the script I just didn't but their performances. Ike Barinholtz's acting just felt like he was reciting his lines and going crazy. Obviously, the humour will definitely not be for everyone and is targeted to a specific group of people.

    Best Part: The airbags...

    MVP: Seth Rogen as Mac Radner

    7/10
  • I'm struggling to understand how this got such good reviews. I usually rate the IMDb score as the gold standard but something has gone seriously wrong here. I did see the trailer, it was good and contained the only laughs of the movie. The movie was truly the most tedious thing I have ever experienced. Why did it get such good reviews from critics and such a high score on IMDb? User reviews here are spot on. Not a single good review. The reviewer above who mentioned he had sat down to more entertaining bowel movements surpassed any joke in the film.

    Something is very wrong here.
  • I will never understand why people slate films like this, comedies are never going to have Oscar winning performances or scripts, so to the people who come and review films like these I think why go in the first place, you watch different types of films for different reasons, comedies to laugh, romantic films for dates etc etc.....

    The main reservation I have with comedy films recently is that most seem to have all the best bits in the trailer and the rest of the film is kinda flat, this was not one of those at all. I laughed from start to finish and so did my girlfriend.

    I'm not the biggest seth rogan fan, I liked a few of his films and hated others but he was awesome in this, a real down to earth guy you can relate to, his wife played by Rose Byrne was also very funny, women tend to have comedic roles toned down in films but she was as good if not better than rogan. Their acting was good, they clicked well and seemed like a couple most could relate to.

    Then comes the frat boys, led by zac effron Christopher mintz plasse and Dave Franco who were all superb at what they did, considering they were all 6-10 years older than their roles they played them perfectly. Good chemistry between the group. Also had some great cameos including Lisa kudrow as the dean. The casting and acting were great. The actress who stole the show though was Stella played by twin babies, she is the cutest baby I have ever seen and was really funny. Zac effron although begrudgingly is one fit dude, he seems like a decent comedy actor as well, I loved 17 again so maybe this could be a more common role.

    Being English I don't fully understand fraternities and the American traditions and I'm unsure that a university would purchase real estate in a suburban neighbourhood knowing it to be a loud party filled mad house. But either way I don't care about how something may or may not happen it was a good plot and worked well throughout. Zac and seth were great together! The overall chemistry was great and the film looked so much fun to make.

    I loved this movie there are easily 15-20 hilarious moments which had some cinema goers clapping (that never happened when I saw the snoozefest gravity which is a supposed masterpiece) everything is there to make a good comedy film, chemistry, relate-able characters, a plot that if it happened to you you probably would act similar to how they played it! Start off as cool neighbours before entering all out war.

    The flat bits in the film where there's more dialogue were fine, it never felt slow or boring, the hilarity was well worth the wait. The film is easily the best comedy in years. I won't say much more than if you've been disappointed with recent comedies you won't be by this, go to the cinema or wait for DVD cut ages 10-30 will love this! Maybe even the older folks to, ignore the low reviews and scores , people have lost their sense of humour!

    9/10 must see
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie was no Animal House! Directed by Nicholas Stoller, Neighbors or Bad Neighbors known internationally isn't that funny. Originally titled Townies; the movie is about Mac Radner (Seth Rogen) and his wife Kelly (Rose Byrne), trying to raise their newborn daughter in a quiet neighborhood. It was going well, for them, until one day, the couple, finds out that Delta Psi, a fraternity known for their outrageous parties, has moved next door. Leaded by Teddy Sanders (Zac Efron) and Pete Regazolli (Dave Franco), the fraternity is searching for the ultimate party that would give them, short-term fame. After a few loud parties, Mac and Kelly ask them to keep it down, only to have Delta Psi begin to constantly haze Mac and Kelly to dangerous lows. I have to say, the movie is just big irritating movie that really wants to push your buttons. The fraternity are certainly not the heroes, nor the really bad immature and irresponsible parents, Mac & Kelly who love to party hard, too. I get it, Kelly and Mac haven't yet quite accepted that parenthood will mean the end of their old, irresponsible life. It wasn't until meeting the frat, that they realize that. Still, just think if the parents were actually responsible adults conflicting young frat boys; it might be a lot better. Instead, both camps are really just horrible dumb unlikeable people for the most part. Honestly, I lost all respect for both characters half way through the film, as I couldn't root for any of them. Attempted murder & threats to a New Born Baby was just too dark for me to find funny. I know some comedies wouldn't fit in the tone of logic, but the movie tries really hard to be realistic, here, but fails badly. It's hard to believe that no one in the neighbor would mind their obnoxiously loud, all-night parties, besides the Mac's family. It defy logic even more with the movie lame excuse on not calling the cops. The movie even set up a theme about growing up and taking adult taking responsibility that somehow gets lost due to its skit to skit plot line. It was so disjointed that it barely manage to retain some vestige of a plot. Don't look for any smart or cleaver humor, here. Most of them are really cretin. The film camera work is pretty awful in the party scenes. It looks and felt like a really bad trip, with light potentially, that could trigger seizures for people with photosensitive epilepsy. Add the large amount of nudity, drugs use, and drinking that make you feel dirty for watching it. It's rated R, but feels more like a NC-17 film. Honestly, it's was made painful like a hangover, when you think how mean spirited and degrading, everybody is. There is a considerable amount of profanity that doesn't make it funnier. This comedy shows a lot of crude humor from a frat guy has his penis around a girl's neck, circle jerking, to a baby eating a condom, but for me, it was more misses than hits. None of it is in good taste and many will be offended many people. I do have a sense of humor, and find certain toilet humor, funny, but Seth Rogen pothead, perverted style of humor has gotten old, and felt out of place here. Don't get me wrong, Seth Rogen is definitely funny in certain movies. It's obvious that he doesn't appeal to everyone taste, but this was a void of humor. Talk about art imitating life, Zac Efron during filming had to go to rehab stint for substance abuse. I don't know if I call his acting, great. I don't really hate the guy. Efron seems to be playing a simple water down version of himself; here. Relying on good looks and charm rather than any real talent to make his way in the world. Rose Byrne is well-used in her role, but there was an oddly place, fake looking milking scene, that wasn't really needed to enforce the main plot. It just serve as an excuse for a gross-out. Another character, oddly place is Christopher Mintz-Plasse. I really don't remember any funny moments from him, at all. I do have to say, a character really noticeable is Ike Barinholtz as Jimmy. He really made the movie, fun for me. I do have to say, the baby Stella played by the Vargas Twins are just cute and adorable. I wish, they feature more of the baby into the plot, as it's seem really odd for the baby able to sleep well, during most of the loud parties. It seems that both Mac & Kelly were pretty neglectful of the baby, during these parties' revenge scenes. It seem the plot was hardly about the baby, but saying it was. Honestly, the ending was pretty cheesy. Without spoiling too much of it, I really don't see Mac & Teddy ever being friends again. Come on, he threaten your family, Mac!!! Overall: Mediocre as hell. If you saw the trailer. You saw the best bits of the film. While the humor, mostly appeal to the high school/college audience. I do believe that the jokes could had been retouch a bit, to appeal to a wider audience. It's OK to be a little vulgar, but when most of your material is, you risk offending and turning off a lot of viewers. Honestly, not a watchable movie without getting a little annoyed.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I'm wondering if the infant in the film has fired her agent for landing her this gig.

    I love bawdy humor. I actually love bad movies ("The Thing With Two Heads", for example) but this one misses on every count and I'm supremely puzzled by the positive reviews along with alleged media critics asking if this is the "...funniest comedy of the year?"

    Really?

    The basic concept was not a bad one -- partying frat boys next door to a 30-something-couple-with-infant trying to retain their youthful coolness -- that the couple never convinces you they had in the first place.

    As a former journalist who knows many useless small details, it grated on me that the frat house operated so far outside of municipal regulations its existence would never have been allowed along with rickety plot gimmicks that derail the couple's efforts to uproot the frat boys through official means.

    The sexual humor was uncomfortably crude and unfunny rather than bawdy (i.e., the scene where a frat boy wins a fight using his erection) and there is not the slightest success in creating the most threadbare aura of believability necessary for genuine comedy.

    Those who made this film could have taken some lesson's from Chaucer's Miller's Tale on how to handle off-color sexual humor and scatology with precision and good effect.

    It seemed the writers thought up crude things and then reverse-engineered them into the script making it a collection of rather dumb gags disconnected from a discernible story arc.

    My afternoon viewing of this film was interesting in that the entire audience was 60 or older and when the film ended the house was silent.
  • Yes, as you may have already read a hundred times, this film is absolute boring FILTH. Also, you should be very aware by now that the "good reviews" and ratings for this movie are certainly bought and paid for.

    What blows my mind is that these types of films cost many millions of precious dollars to make. If just ONE of these meaningless films would simply cease to exist, a small country could likely be fed! It's truly amazing that such a tiny group of people working within Hollywood have millions in spare change to make this kind of garbage and then have the audacity to CHARGE people to be dumbed-down, brainwashed, and mentally/emotionally corrupted.

    It's time to wake up....Supporting this mindless smut is to our detriment.
  • abouhelier-r11 August 2014
    A couple with a newborn baby face unexpected difficulties after their new neighbors, who happen to be a fraternity house, moved in. Therefore they are forced to live next to each other.

    This movie could have gone both ways. In one hand you could leave and think it was the worst movie you ever seen. In the other hand you could think it was extremely entertaining and funny. There are some very funny jokes and likable absurdities during the competition between the two houses, they are pranking each other back and forth, which is fun to watch. I feel like there are a great chemistry between the stars; not only between Rose Byrne and Seth Rogen who are fantastic together, but also between Efron and Rogen. They are really good. Indeed, both of them are in the same path but in different ways. They are experiencing the same things. There is a gap between them as one is going from teenage hood to adulthood as he experiments the fact of being a dad and the other has to face the harsh reality leaving college and working world. Plus, Rose Byrne is absolutely amazingly hilarious in this movie, she totally gets that!

    Overall, Neighbors is an enjoyable movie thanks to fun characters and cast chemistry. It's the perfect summertime comedy that we all want to see every summer.
  • titanill-068181 November 2020
    I'm quite surprised by the latest bad reviews. The movie fulfil perfectely its promise. Fun and entertaining. Rose Byrne is a pleasure to watch. Give it a shot, I didn't regret it.
  • Was not as good as all the hype but had a good amount of laughs.
  • coltybeballin20 December 2023
    "Neighbors" delivers non-stop laughs and unexpected twists in this raucous comedy directed by Nicholas Stoller. Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne showcase their comedic talents as a couple navigating the challenges of parenthood while living next door to a rowdy fraternity led by Zac Efron's charismatic and hilarious character. The film excels in blending outrageous humor with genuine moments of heart and relatability, creating a unique and entertaining dynamic between the neighbors. Memorable supporting performances, comedic set pieces, and sharp dialogue contribute to the film's comedic brilliance. While the film's raunchy humor may not be for everyone, "Neighbors" successfully entertains with its energetic pacing, engaging characters, and laugh-out-loud moments, making it a must-watch for fans of comedic cinema.
  • I saw this film on opening day with a friend because I was bored, and did not expect much. After seeing the trailer I thought "this movie will make me laugh a bit, but will probably suck overall", and I was mistaken. I was pleasantly surprised by how funny this movie was surprisingly funny. I am not a big Seth Rogen fan, but he was funny. The biggest stand-out performance was from Zach Effron. He has come a long way since being a Disney star, and he was the reason for a good number of laughs I got from this film. I see a lot of reviews on here complaining about how dirty and vulgar this film was... did none of you read the rating? This movie is rated R for "pervasive language, strong crude and sexual content, graphic nudity, and drug use throughout"... I mean, for God's sake Rogen and Effron get in a dildo fight(which was hilarious).If you are offended by such things, a prude, or easily offended in general, you probably should not see this film. If you do not care about that, and expect a fun movie full of laughs, cussing and partying, this is a film for you. Hope you enjoy.
  • Absurdly funny is perhaps the best way to describe this comedy which successfully embraces its genre role, as Neighbors depicts a somewhat typical comedic clash of two polar opposites, but does so in a refreshing and interesting way, exploring themes of responsibility and immaturity along the way. Although quite outrageous at times, the film does have some unexpected additional layers of complexity which prove beneficial, adding greater depth without hurting its comedic aspects. Surprisingly enough, Rose Byrne stands out from the cast that includes such talents as Zac Efron and Seth Rogen, and her performances is undoubtedly worth praising as she displays great comedic ability. Overall, Neighbors can be described as a highly energetic film which stays true to itself and with a short running time is aware of its limitations, ultimately resulting in a funny comedy that delivers in every way and is definitely worth watching.
  • As I write this review, there are around 200 reviews posted. As far as I can tell, fewer than 10 of them rate this film at 7 stars or above, yet its average rating is slightly more than 7 stars. In fact, while the vast majority of reviews on the first five pages give it only 1 star, the ratings summary says that only 1.2% of those rating it gave it just 1 star.

    This is a long way of saying that it's now inescapable fact that trolls, spoofers, and studio shills dominate the site. A system is only useful until enough people figure out how to game it, and this is (sadly) now the case for this site.

    On to the review: Neighbors had a big challenge to overcome with me, as I just don't normally find Seth R. and his "Seth Pack" to be very funny. Unfortunately, this film fails on every level to provide either humor or entertainment. It's a rare film that can depict all characters as totally unsympathetic and get away with it. After all, the viewer needs to be able to identify with SOMEONE in a story or film, even if it's the third-party narrator. This movie has absolutely no sympathetic characters in it at all. It's the essence of comedic nihilism. I didn't like any of the characters, none of them said anything that was vaguely funny, and I didn't identify with any point of view expressed in the film. To make matters worse, the director relied solely on profanity and T&A for shock value.

    Totally worthless movie. Don't waste your time.
  • masonsaul20 April 2020
    Bad Neighbours is a great comedy that explores an interesting premise extremely effectively, even if a few jokes don't land. Seth Rogen, Rose Byrne and Zac Efron are all great. Ike Barinholtz and Dave Franco are really good. The majority of the jokes are funny and at certain points hilarious. Nicholas Stoller's direction is great and its extremely well filmed. It's also well paced and the soundtrack is really good.
  • It's like they were trying to see how inappropriate they could make this movie to make people laugh. The plot is REALLY simple. The movie is more relying on the "funny lines" and "funny scenes." I guess if you really like some of the actors or think they're funny or cute or whatever, you'll be interested.

    I don't really know what to say. It was a good time..? At some parts it really made me laugh and was just laughing at how stupid it is. While I was watching it, I knew that basically Dave Franco and Zac Efron were the reason I actually bought the ticket.

    After it ended, it left me feeling nothing. There is no satisfaction that comes with it. Hey if you're watching with your friends and just hanging out and laughing, it'll be really fun! But don't look for anything more in this movie. It's a good time. But just judging as a film, it's weak.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    There was promise in the premise of two opposites dealing with a too close for comfort situation. Sadly, every single element here is the worst of the worst. From the writing, to the non existent "comedy", to the horrible casting choices and the lack of chemistry in many of the different couples here. It's hard to feel any empathy for the old couple, or even believe any of the brothers were really fond of each other, and the unbelievably stupidity of the script dragged everyone to even lower levels. This was one time when one was wishing for negative numbers to be used for ratings here.

    Seth Rogen, usually a very likable everyday type only annoys everyone from the beginning, and Gowan can't lend any credibility to her role as the wife of this loser. This is probably to the fact she has always played women who are either a plain Jane type or have the ability to manipulate or deceive those around them. She doesn't seem capable of showing any degree of sexiness, and the dialog she has been given makes the situation more ludicrous than ever.

    Here comes Zach who doesn't fare as badly, but there is still nothing he can do with the horrible puns, lines, and directions, if we can call them given to him by whoever was directing this mess. Sitting through this is probably the equivalent of water torture, medieval sadism, or something worse. It was torture for the sense because of the endless barrage of vulgarity, ineptitude, and huge amounts of contempt for those in the audience. It was offensive in so many levels with its visual display of scenes that deserve an NC-17 more than an R. Language, visuals, jokes, special effects, everything is here was deplorable and disgusting.

    It's not that we had a couple of desperate morons trying to outdo each other in order to stop a situation like this. We have seen it before, and it has been at least entertaining or done in a creative manner to suggest an action, rather to give unnecessary graphic imagery. What is happening here? We had "The Watch" and their obsession with male private parts and scatological jokes, then "The Wolf" came along, and we were supposed to believe drug abuse was good cinema, and now this came to top everything else. A big problem was that this is lending no credibility to what critics might potentially say in the future. I truly don't understand what film they saw, but there is absolutely nothing to recommend about this disaster.
An error has occured. Please try again.