Add a Review

  • Just watched "In The Flesh" and thoroughly enjoyed it. An interesting take on Zombie apocalypse, playing with our preconceptions of Zombie rules and presenting a tense personal drama. Many plot lines and complex relationships with plenty to make you think about in between episodes.

    Disappointed to see one (spectacularly) bad review for this mini-series but I think all of the other positive reviews speak for themselves. If you want to see some Zombie carnage (which I do like) then this is not it. However, given that almost all Zombie films/series feature brains and blood letting action, I think there is room for something a bit more contemplative, gentle and thought provoking.
  • well,I'm two episodes in and I'm hooked.i was a bit dubious at first about the cast,but i have to say they've all got into their roles brilliantly.its especially worth noting the performances of steve evets and ricky tomlinson,both truly underrated actors who have a larger than life screen presence and boy can they deliver those emotional scenes...

    'in the flesh' is gritty,solid,brilliantly written and delves into questions never asked before.even the soundtrack has its moments of simple beauty.

    if you like zombies and you like good television,'in the flesh' is well worth watching.

    9/10.....(it loses a star because 3 episodes is not enough...which when you think about it,is a compliment to the writers and their ability to weave a gripping story....I'm hooked and 3 eps just isn't enough)
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In The Flesh begins at the end, by asking us this question: What if the un-dead could be cured?

    The un-dead have been cured, reclassified as Partially Deceased Syndrome sufferers and are returning to their homes, their lives, their towns. Towns filled with non-sufferers who have spent years fighting PDS sufferers (Rotters), fearing them, killing them to survive themselves.

    And that's where we are invited to watch how the integration unfolds.

    You could simplify it down to homosexual allegory (there is a queer aspect to the central character's storyline), but that's like saying that Casablanca is about a bar in Morocco. The philosophical concepts dealt with so far are more complex than that.

    How we accept, or don't accept, the things we don't understand and the consequences of that. The concept of nature versus nurture (There is this scene toward the end of the second episode, involving a father and his daughter. Heartbreakingly beautiful in it's simplicity). Honesty - how we deal with the truth when it is often so hurtful.

    Everything feels real about this series. Other shows I'm watching at the moment either break the fourth wall and remind you they aren't real, or they make mistakes and it takes you out of the world they have created for a moment - Revolution should work, but the soundtrack is mismatched with the events on screen and keeps jolting me out of the shows reality. The Following has fantastic actors and the idea is great but there are still moments where you catch yourself thinking something was a little too convenient, even within the confines of the reality of the show.

    I haven't had that with In The Flesh yet. The soundtrack is minimalist, and that works for this kind of television. The actors are talented, the conversations on screen are so understated, which is refreshing. I hope the series creators can continue what they've begun, I think it will be interesting to see where this goes.
  • Rarely does a drama come along which is original as In the Flesh. I fear that when most people hear it's about zombies they imagine it's a poor man's Walking Dead but actually the two shows have few things in common. The show is all about what happens when zombies are cured and brought back into society.

    One of the one hand it is a good supernatural drama. "Rotters", as they tend to be known in this world, actually play a bigger part in the second series. There are rotter attacks and a mythology about a second rising. The whole concept is unique and the writers continually add the the actually pretty small mythos.

    On the other hand though the "partially deceased syndrome" sufferers play a very real-world role. They are symbolic of any race or group of people have been segregated and made a prejudice by the majority due to fear and lack of understanding. The key point is that the undead only cause trouble when they are provoked. There are also lots of other issues appearing in the show, like extreme politics and the effect of religion.

    A supernatural drama which brilliantly reflects on real world issues, In the Flesh is brilliant. The first series was good but the second series totally eclipses it. I really hope that it will get a third series.
  • This show is one of the best I've seen in a very long time. The cast are amazing, the writing is complex, but not overly so, and, despite the series featuring zombies, it's very easy to relate to in real life. Issues like discrimination are tackled in an eye-opening way without being preachy. There's representation for the queer community, though again, the queer characters are not solely defined by their sexuality, nor does their characterisation hinge on it. The topics of depression, anxiety, self- worth, self-acceptance, and PTSD are explored in a meaningful and honest way. Add to that the drama of families regaining someone they'd lost and grieved for and you've got gold.

    I watched the entire series in just over a day and I'm dying for a third one. I can only hope that we've not seen the last of this world as it has so much to offer.
  • IrishFrog23 July 2013
    In The Flesh did something most series or movies can't do to me: it actually caught my attention, it motivated me to stay with my eyes glued to the screen and even go back when I didn't pay attention for a minute.

    The thing I like most about this series is that it doesn't portray "zombies" as other productions. They're not the cruel creatures that come to kill you, even though they can be like that in their most primitive stages. Those who have the so called PDS are as rational or emotional as anyone who hasn't died before.

    The fact that the protagonist is one of the "zombies" makes it more interesting, for we see their suffering from their own point of view, we feel their struggles to overcome the prejudice that targets them and to deal with the bad they involuntarily did.

    With its moral questions, innovative plot and entertaining production, In The Flesh is definitely a must see. The only reason I didn't give it a higher rating is that it hasn't yet answered many questions I have, but I trust that new seasons will come and bring the required information.
  • This TV show is not like most of the movies featuring zombies. In the flesh is set after the apocalypse, where zombies can be treated and they can be a part of the society. The show focuses on the psychical damages of the treated zombies, how families deal with that they've got back their dead family members, the fear of the unknown and the discrimination. Sometimes it's very touching and makes you think about our society. The treated zombies behave just like other people, so don't expect too many brain eating walkers, like in walking dead. This show is not violent that way. But it shows us, that a zombie show doesn't have to be full of blood and brains.
  • sams_world_u_know2 April 2013
    Warning: Spoilers
    Please know that when i rate things, 5 is average, not 7.

    "In The Flesh" is a new zombie post apocalypse TV show by the BBC. Most likely that this show was made to capitalise the explosion of zombie media brought on by AMC's "The Walking Dead". When I said that this is a post apocalypse TV show, this really is post. The show is set after the zombies have been dealt with and a semi cure has been found to give free will back to the zombies but not fully resurrecting them. These former zombies are now being reintroduced into society with a very negative attitude from the public.

    I find the best way to look at a zombie TV show or movie is too take zombies out of it. This may sound stupid but if zombies could be replaced with something else like robots or your horny mum, and the show still works its a good sign. The reason The Walking Dead works so well is because it focuses on the relationships between humans and if there we're no zombies and most of humanity was wiped out buy a bomb or giant space octopus, the show would remain just as good. So basically what i'm saying is the mark of a good zombie film or TV show is if it doesn't need zombies. Does "In The Flesh" meet these standards?

    Well I'm pleased to say it does. If the zombie's had been replaced by an infectious disease and the public didn't want the formerly infected to be reintroduced because they might get infected, it would work just as well. It deals with elements of prejudiced and what constitutes a human being. Should people accept those who once attacked them because of a drug. Is it right to kill something that's already dead. Something else I appreciated was the fact it hinted at things to let you stay one step ahead of the story. It will fill you with a great sense of pride when you figure something out before you're told. That's not to say you can guess whats happening next but it almost always gives you the opportunity. I would have preferred if they had left things open. The show is going "have you figured it out yet? have you?" And I loved that. You have your own idea of what might of happened but your not sure. Then like a complete ass hole it goes "fuck it we have to cater to idiots too." And just tells you. I'm going to give you an example of this but ****WARNING SPOILER ALERT**** now that we've gotten rid of some wussies. The Main protagonist, Kieren a former Zombie (not the spoiler) is a withdrawn and lonely character and there is a cloud of mystery held around his death. It drops subtle hints that if you're paying attention you'll pick up on. Then BAM it f***ing tells you, he killed himself. Thats the kind of thing you either never reveal or you wait until the season finale or something. I like open ended movies and TV shows. See Donnie Darko on how to do it, and Prometheus on how not to.

    "In The Flesh" actually has some surprisingly good cinematography and symbolism. It also knows how to show emotion. There is one very memorable scene when they kill a mans former zombie wife in front of him and it very nearly almost made me a little sad. That's not to say it doesn't have its fair share of plot holes. Like after the scene where they kill the mans wife you used to be a zombie nothing happens. These former zombies are meant to be seen as people again by the law. So what the woman's husband just doesn't call the police. He had his wife killed very publicly in front of him and the character who did it just gets away with it? The other problem is that its established that the zombies don't infect other and that all previous zombies died before the outbreak and crawled out of their graves. If that's the case whats the cut off point? Why aren't there any skeletons walking about the place? or decayed zombies? I understand that its BBC 3 program and that they don't have the same make-up budget as most other shows but they really do leave the some pretty annoying plot holes.

    Overall though I would recommend "In The Flesh" it hits lots of the check list i look for in a zombie show, but there is the burning question. Is it better than walking dead? No.
  • mellyb-492-27945318 March 2013
    Warning: Spoilers
    *CONTAINS SPOILERS*

    I find it very refreshing the show starts off with a completely different view than TWD for example. We get to step into the zombie shoes; lead actor's humanity is re-installed by medication and we follow his rehabilitation back to society. As expected, it doesn't go nice and smooth.

    We get to see humanity from a perspective most of us would not think to think on our own and I believe this is one of the strong points the show has.

    The cast seems great and I'm very much looking forward to the next episode.
  • Familiar ground, some of which was covered years ago in THEY CAME BACK (a movie that seemed genuinely GENUINE at the time). IN THE FLESH takes the basic premise and runs with it- though not always successfully. Essentially a mix of THEY CAME BACK and any one of the dozen or so Vampire series that have saturated screens both Big and Small for the past decade or so, IN THE FLESH nonetheless sometimes manages to be intriguing and poignant. The Institutionalization of The Rotters makes for some interesting (if not exactly always plausible) situations. (To be fair, we're talking about a Zombie teleshow. Whaddaya want, Billy Shakespeare...?) For Zombie completists, IN THE FLESH is worth the time and effort, but, for non-Zombieists, it might NOT be.
  • When you see a new drama previewed on BBC Three you can be sometimes forgiven for thinking 'its on a channel for kids and student types -must be rubbish' and then forgot all about it. I remembered Id seen the trailer and decided to give it a go-not expecting much...after all its on BBC Three.

    So I gave it a go and I wasn't disappointed. In the Flesh is a brilliantly written and acted, realist, British 'kitchen sink drama' take on the Zombie apocalypse that gives the viewer lots to think about on Life, Death and Love.

    With standout performances from Ken Loach stalwarts Ricky Tomlinson and Steve Evets and newcomers Luke Newberry and Harriet Cains In the Flesh delivers as emotionally driven drama and a horror
  • samanthaummel29 July 2018
    Warning: Spoilers
    Love it reminds me a lot of the world these days like racism and homophobia
  • I find myself unfortunately with nothing to remember or ponder about after finishing season one. The theme is about how we treat those who are different from the norm of our society, but it is is presented in pretty much the most straightforward way possible. There was not a single memorable line, or a deep philosophical thought present throughout. The normal stuff you would expect to happen in any dysfunctional community filled with prejudice happens, except with rehabilitated, medicated zombies driving the narrative. You could pretty much replace the zombies with any other kind of minority group and the show would be pretty much the same. I know that this is probably the intended symbolism of the creators, but it didn't work for me.

    I am a big fan of the "what it means to be human" theme, and expected a lot more after having read the reviews. A similar (by concept) drama "the Leftovers" is also about dysfunctional people living in a post-catastrophe world in fear and uncertainty. The difference is that "the Leftovers" has complex characters and layers of depth while the moral lessons of "in the flesh" are, in my opinion, aimed to impress only intellectual lightweights. Another very similar British show, "Humans" also leaves a stronger impression with better acting and a bit, (though not enough) more depth.
  • \Going into this series i knew only one thing about this show and that was it had zombies in it and I needed something to tie me over until the next season of Walking Dead arrived. What i got was an emotional roller coaster which not only takes the typical zombie gore fest in a new and less mindless direction but provides an inescapable emotional roller coaster ride which i would highly recommend.

    The series focuses on Kieren Walker a recovering zombie who is placed back with his family and has to deal with his new condition as well as the prejudice and hate that comes from the accepting community around him. The concept itself is very interesting and many of the subjects it touches upon has real world and often very relative implications.

    In The Flesh is not a TV show to watch for mindless entertainment, it looks deeply at real world issues and can get quite dark, looking at ideas of prejudice, suicide, sexuality and extreme religious views. What ever you do don't watch In the Flesh for loads of gore or violence because you wont get much, however this I think serves the show well and its sparing use of violence and gore even more impact when situations do escalate to deadly results.

    Visually the show is a treat and beautifully shot, with excellent locations and a diverse range of settings its hard to falter the production values of this show. Acting is top notch and every cast member gives memorable performances and I think this is what really brings in the flesh to life. It creates these living breathing characters that you feel for and understand, which makes their problems even more relatable and interesting.

    I have to warn you though that this is not a feel good tap your heels and skip off into the sunset type of show and I often tell people that if you get into this show there will be more than a few tears shed by the end. To me this show has positioned itself quite comfort next to some of my favourite TV shows. Well worth a check out. Bring on Season 2 is all I can say!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    SPOILERS BELOW.

    In the flesh was simply amazing from start to finish i was caught up in whirls of emotion , from disgust to empathy. Set after a outbreak for the dead rising from the graves the government has invented a vaccine that is injected directly into the back of the neck to stop the rotters from turning back into savage beasts they once where. All the undead are kept in a special army /nhs ran hospital to treat them for the illness. The government is someday hoping for them to return back to normal life by sending them back to their families.

    However there is a horde of civilians that aren't to happy about the idea of co-existing with the once mindless zombies that ate human brains. Armed with some of the latest weapons they set out to stop them coming back into civilian life.

    The plot is simply sublime never in my life of watching horrors would i of though about a event that could happen after a invasion of zombies. It was always just a massacrer and ended badly. But somehow the writers of this show have thought up something so unique its stunned and shocked me to my very core.

    If your a fan of zombie films , and great British acting. Please watch this 3 part show! I cant credit the writers enough for bringing a new age of zombie shows on us.

    9/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    There must be an industry term for this style of television writing; it requires you to pay attention to every scene and everything that the characters say, so that you can form an idea of the world that the writer is creating. This is refreshingly challenging for the TV viewer who is accustomed to the plodding pace of The Walking Dead, for example. In The Flesh takes advantage of flashbacks to fill in the story as the relationships among the characters are slowly filled in. It's engaging to watch, but sometimes a bit disorienting.

    The show hints at themes without overtly addressing them; for example, when a member of the HVF shoots the old woman, is it murder? No, because she's already dead. But was she the same person after she returned home? This is why Jem relentlessly needles Kieren, unconvinced that he is the same person that she grew up with. Also, will Kieren get older, or will he always stay the same age? After returning home, Kieren's younger sister is now his older sister. Will millions of PDS sufferers forever wander the earth, watching generations of normal people grow old and die before them, including their family? Can PDS sufferers reproduce? These ideas are ripe for exploration.

    There are some odd but funny scenes: Amy and Phil sleeping together, Kieren's odd dining habits, Kieren looking into his own grave, the PDS social worker bit, Kieren & family playing the game of Life, Amy's hilariously inappropriate small talk, the processing center, "rotters" in the amusement park, Kieren's bizarre makeup to make him look "normal", etc. This show accurately portrays what would happen if zombies were repatriated into their communities, and it does it with an authentic, hometown feel, and all the paranoia and anger from the villagers that you might expect.

    For all its good points, the show is sometimes manipulative and sappy, for example at the end when the father recounts finding his son, dead, in the cave, and father and son embrace; what should have been an emotionally crushing moment comes off as weak, especially with the father standing there blubbering. It doesn't work. But this show is so well-written that I was happy to learn that BBC green lit a second season; theses are characters that I want to learn more about, especially the colorful and irreverent Amy.

    I expect the Syfy channel will probably create their own version and it will be predictably watered down and sucky.
  • I first heard of In the Flesh from Tumblr and I am incredibly happy to have found the show. I would say that this is one of my favorite TV shows of all time. In the Flesh not only provides an entertaining story filled with gripping story lines and interesting characters, but also shows a social commentary of the world we live in. I can not repeat enough how much I love Series 1 and Series 2. I think that Series 2, which has just finished, was perfect. The writing on this show is fantastic and you just want to continue to watch and re-watch. I sincerely hope that BBC Three decides to renew this show for another series. I have already ordered by box set for Series 1 and 2!!
  • This is probably the best show I've ever seen - dramatic and passionate and soul crushingly bittersweet...

    It's disappointing it was cut too short, this would have been a perfect series of 3 or 4 seasons, to finish the story...
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's sad. This show would have been great. It would have continued to be great, is what I mean. I guess it didn't have enough Hollywood bullshit. It had the viewer-ship, just it wasn't like some other shows. It was incomparable and I guess for some, bullshit love triangles and sex as the main plot line is a must. I watched all the episodes in one sitting. Was disappointed when there weren't more. I had hoped Amazon would pick it up but *sigh*. Same fate as Firefly... (any fans out there? no? ) I'm hoping that somehow, this show will be saved but I know not to hold my breath; the acting, the story...it would have been so good. :(
  • I really wanted to like "In the Flesh", but I just can't :( I'm an avid fan of zombie genre; Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead (both versions), 28 Days Later, Walking Dead. I'm even tolerant of off-beat zombie genre (Shawn of the Dead, Black Sheep) and low-budget indie zombie genre (Stakeland).

    So I *expected* to like "In the Flesh". It has an intelligent an novel premise; the world had a rough time, but did not end, and now is trying to recover from the zombie apocalypse. Lots of good metaphors for racism and classism, mixed with the legitimate fears of violence and the threats posed by religious fundamentalism. This should be premium stuff.

    But it makes one deadly error: it is BORING! Slow, plodding, monotonous. The plot moves at the pace of a wounded slug. They take *ages* to get anywhere. This same story, with the content they have, could have been presented in 1/3 the time, and would have been better or it. After an hour, I could not take it any more, and turned it off :(
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I loved this show! The actors did an amazing job. The story was compelling, brilliant storyline that touched on a subject that many other shows/movies have danced around but never fully explored.

    What happens if they DO find a cure? Will people forget the past and accept them back? Will they be deemed victims or monsters? I was completely shocked by the last episode, I almost cried!

    I became completely hooked after the second episode and had no idea that there were only THREE episodes, so I was left wanting more.

    I need to know what happens with Lisa and the Prophet! Please tell me there will be more!!!?

    I gave it a 9 out of 10, it lost a star for only having 3 episodes :( One of my favorite new shows :D
  • Now, I would have given it a ten, but I've only seen the first episode and drama's normally cannot achieve a ten and I doubt they ever will.

    The good: This is one of the only drama's that aren't over dramatic, most over dramas have them overreacting to everything which is stupid and pointless. But in the flesh captures the drama genre perfectly like no other drama could ever do.

    The action is spectacular and fresh, it's not everyday you see a zombie drama is it? This one just get's the job done just right.

    The lighting sets a great effect that really capture the atmosphere of it all.

    The storyline is also superb and strong.

    It's very unique of how the zombies can be good if they aren't rabid!

    The bad: Only 3 episodes, now this is one of the only bad points. It isn't so bad but I would love it to be at least six part drama.

    Can be sometimes confusing, like sometimes you won't know what's going on. Like some people won't know what a rotter is.

    9/10 it's an amazing drama that is worth checking out.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is quite simply one of the best TV shows ever. This show is marvelously and tightly plotted, but it is not about "zombies". The plot is about relationships - the relationship between Rick and Ren that led to the implosion of Ren's family and a direct line to his sister's involvement in the HVF. In the third episode of the first season, the conversation between Ren and his mom in the cave made me sob. Mascara streaks and pausing the show for twenty minutes. "I would love you if you came back as a goldfish." As tight as the story is, the suspense in season two is just as fun as the plot begins to blossom.

    Some of the plot lines: the ideas of love and life, acceptance, sexuality, suicide, government policies, slang and labels, popularity and what we will do to fit in versus individuality, equal rights, our idea of sickness and disease, familial relationships and roles, parents' dreams and ideas for their children, history and the way it is taught in the formal education system, religion and the belief systems that are insidious in small villages, radicalism in many forms, self-delusions,alternative medicine, immigration issues. It is all amazingly well captured in this little drama.

    I have NEVER given a TV show a 10 before and I hope that I do get to see another 10 star show in my lifetime. This show is much better than Walking Dead (which I also love). Re-integration instead of apocalypse. You can't look away or you will miss the relationships between all the people in the storyline. Watch it more than once to catch all the amazing s*** in the background. I love this show.
  • I give this show a 9 because although I do miss the gratuitous violence of traditional zombie flicks, I cannot deny the truly unique premise of the show. Rather than fighting to survive against a zombie horde the characters, are learning to live with zombies, who are not the real evil in the show. Instead the evil is rather the bigotry and ignorance of the human race itself, a kind of mindlessness paralleled in the behavior of zombies themselves. I could expound on and on about the thematic subtitles I've detected whilst viewing season one. But that would belabor the point. Besides the outstanding writing, and top-notch acting this show also delivers an amazing atmosphere, Kieran truly looks like an embalmed corpse all drenched in foundation, his haunting glassy eyes white and ghostly reflecting the foggy depths which engulf every scene... blah blah. In conclusion though I recommend this show because it really encapsulates what true horror, good horror is all about, a story wherein the characters themselves discover themselves to be monsters akin if not worse than the monsters they used to fight against.
  • I happened to stumble upon "In the Flesh" by sheer random luck while browsing zombie titles on Amazon. And the synopsis really had my interest peaked. And of course, anything just even remotely zombiesque does catch my interest.

    And as the first episode was coming to an end, it was clear that this was going to be a hidden gem. And it took very little time to sit through both seasons of the series. Mainly because there were only three episodes to season one and six episodes to season two, but also because the series was just so captivating and interesting that you simply keep watching episode after episode.

    I thoroughly enjoy the approach that they took upon the zombie genre. It was a much needed take on the genre, and it was somewhat of a gamble I assume. But it was a gamble that was well rewarded. It was really good to see the end of a zombie outbreak and to see what could essentially happen in the wake of such a horrid event. The thing with the formerly risen (aka zombies or infected) to be medicated in order to reproduce brain activity and brain cells, and thus in turn return to their former humanity and start the progress of being reinserted back into society was really thought provoking and interesting.

    And the thing about referring to the returned as PDS sufferers (Partially Deceased Syndrome sufferers) was a stroke of genius, especially as it would be likely to happen, as society and law need to slap a label on just about everything.

    There are so many different angles to the storyline in the series that it would be a shame to even just attempt to delve into detailing these. I will say that "In the Flesh" should be watched and experienced to be fully appreciated and taken in, talking about it hardly do it any justice.

    One thing that really made "In the Flesh" come to life, pardon the expression, on the screen was the fabulous ensemble of acting talents. There were a lot of really good actors and actresses in the series. I was especially impressed with Emily Bevan (playing Amy), Emmett J Scanlan (playing Simon), Luke Newberry (playing Kieren) and Steve Evets (playing Bill). Even though some of these people play characters that you will dislike, it is hard to ignore the talent that the actor or actress possess in bringing such a character to life (or unlife) on the screen.

    The special effects team did a great job in bringing the PDS sufferers and the PDS sufferers in their untreated condition to life (or unlife, as it is) on the screen.

    Don't expect this to be a run-of-the-mill addition to the zombie genre, with heaps of blood, gore and vicious dismemberment. If so, then you will be sorely disappointed. Instead, expect a clever, thought provoking series that delves deeper into the zombie genre than previously seen. And expect a series which is fueled by a myriad of different aspects and angles to the storyline.

    I can more than strongly recommend that you take the time to sit down and watch all 9 episodes of "In the Flesh", because it is really a gem in the zombie genre. I am rating it a solid eight out of ten stars without hesitation.
An error has occured. Please try again.