With help from a guardian angel, a rich, spoiled, ultra-material teenage girl learns to find true value in assisting others rather than in material things.With help from a guardian angel, a rich, spoiled, ultra-material teenage girl learns to find true value in assisting others rather than in material things.With help from a guardian angel, a rich, spoiled, ultra-material teenage girl learns to find true value in assisting others rather than in material things.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Jason Avalos
- Giorgio
- (as Jason D. Avalos)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I have seen hundreds of Christmas movies. I don't write reviews often, but I just couldn't let others suffer if I can help it. From the every first 5 minutes of this film, everyone can tell how horrible it will be (people about to get hit by an automobile don't press their bodies against the very same direction they will be getting hit by).
The worst part? (yes, it's about to get even worse), they are making a sequel to this movie.
The worst part? (yes, it's about to get even worse), they are making a sequel to this movie.
I was only able to see the last half of this film school reject. The only good thing about it was that it made me laugh out loud during the big climactic moment. "Cool!"
Angel Gabriel sporting aviator shades? Not a good look, but it turns out they were necessary for the "big scene."
Shooting the reflection in his shades for the "big scene" was pure artistic genius. I guess there weren't any puddles around.
The standards for these made-for-TV Christmas movies are minimal, but this one really lowers the bar. Directing, production, and writing are gimmicky and formulaic. How hard is it to make one of these things anyway?
I had to look this movie up to see if it was supposed to be a comedy, or perhaps has a cult following in the awful movies category.
Angel Gabriel sporting aviator shades? Not a good look, but it turns out they were necessary for the "big scene."
Shooting the reflection in his shades for the "big scene" was pure artistic genius. I guess there weren't any puddles around.
The standards for these made-for-TV Christmas movies are minimal, but this one really lowers the bar. Directing, production, and writing are gimmicky and formulaic. How hard is it to make one of these things anyway?
I had to look this movie up to see if it was supposed to be a comedy, or perhaps has a cult following in the awful movies category.
I have been a member of IMDb for 13 years, and this is the first time I've written a review. That's how dreadful this film was to watch! People must be warned...
Even for a made-for-TV Christmas movie, the plot is markedly formulaic. The moral message feels forced, and the pace and timescale are incohesive. The dialogue is flat, and the dramatic elements are predictable and poorly executed. The sets and locations are reasonable, but the special effects are hilarious. Lots of fans, slow-motion and fake electrical discharges that wouldn't look out of place in a low-budget 1980s sci-fi flick.
The characters are trite, and the lead Donna Spangler is wooden to the point of unintentional comedy. Her stilted delivery made me cringe, and as with the rest of the movie, I kept waiting for the punchline that never came. Dean Cain has demonstrated his acting chops in other roles, but in this one he is background noise in bad sunglasses. I second another review that says he did provide the only laugh-aloud moment in the whole film, but even that was unintentional.
The young secondary lead Ravin Spangler is reasonable yet unremarkable as a spoiled rich girl turned good. Mara Rydell as the maid Lucille had potential, but was not utilised effectively. There are several other supporting characters in the film who appear to be there as furniture. They have few lines, wander about in the background of scenes where no background characters are necessary, and they contribute nothing to the plot.
The one dim bright spot in the whole festive failure is Brandon Tyler Russell, who plays his character 'Jerry' in a manner that evokes genuine sympathy. Jerry is essentially the only character who is given any depth, warmth or likability.
On a final note, the movie doesn't have much of a Christmas setting or feel to it. Aside from a few decorations and a brief Christmas party, the plot could have taken place at any time of year. Overall, I'd say give this movie a miss. There are plenty of made-for-TV Christmas movies that get it right. This is not one of them.
Even for a made-for-TV Christmas movie, the plot is markedly formulaic. The moral message feels forced, and the pace and timescale are incohesive. The dialogue is flat, and the dramatic elements are predictable and poorly executed. The sets and locations are reasonable, but the special effects are hilarious. Lots of fans, slow-motion and fake electrical discharges that wouldn't look out of place in a low-budget 1980s sci-fi flick.
The characters are trite, and the lead Donna Spangler is wooden to the point of unintentional comedy. Her stilted delivery made me cringe, and as with the rest of the movie, I kept waiting for the punchline that never came. Dean Cain has demonstrated his acting chops in other roles, but in this one he is background noise in bad sunglasses. I second another review that says he did provide the only laugh-aloud moment in the whole film, but even that was unintentional.
The young secondary lead Ravin Spangler is reasonable yet unremarkable as a spoiled rich girl turned good. Mara Rydell as the maid Lucille had potential, but was not utilised effectively. There are several other supporting characters in the film who appear to be there as furniture. They have few lines, wander about in the background of scenes where no background characters are necessary, and they contribute nothing to the plot.
The one dim bright spot in the whole festive failure is Brandon Tyler Russell, who plays his character 'Jerry' in a manner that evokes genuine sympathy. Jerry is essentially the only character who is given any depth, warmth or likability.
On a final note, the movie doesn't have much of a Christmas setting or feel to it. Aside from a few decorations and a brief Christmas party, the plot could have taken place at any time of year. Overall, I'd say give this movie a miss. There are plenty of made-for-TV Christmas movies that get it right. This is not one of them.
Horrendous excuse for acting. Sound off so bad it's like it's a dubbed foreign film. I was so annoyed I didn't make it past dean Cain mouthing to the blonde bimbo that she can't touch alive people. Horrendous.
It's a tragedy, the acting, the premise. The main Actress should be fined for torturing us with her horrendous acting. I thought it was a joke or a spoof. If you want to cringe and laugh, go for it. If you're actually looking for a quality xmas movie look elsewhere.
Storyline
Did you know
- Triviathe director of this film won 2011's Arizona film maker of the year
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Soup: Episode #12.47 (2015)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Beverly Hills Puppy
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 26 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content

Top Gap
By what name was Beverly Hills Christmas (2015) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer