User Reviews (1,782)

Add a Review

  • Sally Hawkins puts in a lovely, sweet, almost sympathetic performance as the central character, it's her delicacy balanced against the harshness of the amphibious man that makes it so interesting.

    It's not a film I'd sit through several times over, but I have seen it twice, and was as impressed with my second viewing as the first. It is a beautiful film, with the most glorious soundtrack, a feast for the eyes and ears alike.

    I'm sure there was a social message here, it was perhaps over my head, what I saw was a good old fashioned love story, one with a difference, and a load of eggs.

    It's sad, moving, funny, it's definitely very, very weird, but if you've seen any of his other movies, then you'll realise the inevitability of that.

    It's a unique watch, and a rewarding one, 8/10.
  • It's a time when being different was discouraged, by how you looked, by how you hooked, by how you foraged, in a world of prejudice, the overwhelming emphasis, was to align, to toe the line, to be acknowledged. Elisa's mute, but she still has things to say, using Zelda as a surrogate airway, together they both clean, where there's things that go unseen, behind one doorway there's a place she likes to stay. In this place something's imprisoned and interned, Elisa shows it love, the tides begin to turn, a connection has been made, it's time to escape and evade, logistically that causes some concern.

    Sally Hawkins is as spectacular as ever in an imaginative tale that reflects a world of the past, but not forgotten or disappeared (sadly).
  • iheartmilkshake3 April 2018
    "When he looks at me - the way he looks at me. He does not know what I lack or how I am incomplete. He sees me for what I am, as I am."

    This film was strange, yet haunting. Disturbing, yet poetic. I loved the cinematography, the music, and the moral behind this film. Love is not judgemental, and this film leaves you with an ache in your chest.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I was very skeptical about this movie from the very beginning, because I thought that this would probably be a dumb monster movie with a similar theme like "Beauty and the Beast". However, I was very surprised when I saw the movie and think that it was brilliant!

    After reading the reviews on this site, it is my understanding that many people that saw this move completely misunderstood it, both the people that loved it and the ones who hated it.

    The theme of the movie is not something similar to Beauty and the Beast for those who might think that!

    There are several themes in this movie, but the overall theme is about minorities and how privileged people view those who are different. However to make this message more clear the movie is set in the 1960's, where minorities were generally marginalized.

    The lead character Elisa Esposito is a mute woman, who was an orphaned child that was found in a river with wounds on her neck and communicates through sign language. She works in a government laboratory as a cleaning lady. Her friends are her co-worker Zelda, a black woman who serves as an interpreter for Elisa, and her next-door neighbor Giles, a closeted gay man. Elisa discovers a mysterious creature in the facility and begins to bond with it. The creature is a mute humanoid amphibian that was captured in a river in South America by Strickland, who is in charge of the project to study it.

    Elisa is the main protagonist in this story, and together with Zelda and Giles, they represent a social minority. Women, handicapped people, black people and gay people are all amongst those that were outcast by society at the time. On the other hand, there is Strickland who is the main antagonist in the story and he represents the privileged people at the time. He is a white man in a privileged position, married with children, religious, and is hostile to those who are not like him. He treats the creature hostilely, beats and abuses it, and calls it a monster.

    When Elisa learns that Strickland plans to vivisect the creature, she hatches a plan with the help of her friends to free the creature and keeping it in a bathtub at her apartment and planning to set it free in the ocean. Elisa and the creature bond romantically and it is revealed that the creature has healing powers.

    When the day arrives to set the creature free, Strickland arrives and shoots Elisa and the creature. The creature heals itself and kills Strickland. The creature takes Elisa and jumps into the ocean where it heals her. When the creature applies his healing touch to the scars on her neck, she starts to breathe through gills.

    Here is the TWIST: This scene reveals that Elisa was of the same kind as the creature all along. She just had a more human like form than the creature. There are different clues throughout the film. She was found as child next to a river like the creature. She was found with the "scars" on her neck and they turned out to be dormant gills as the creature healed her. She was mute like the creature. She loved being in water as shown in her morning habits. She was initially attracted to the creature whereas most people would fear it. She comes from a Spanish speaking country, as her last name is Spanish whereas the creature was found in a river in South America.

    The creature itself and Elisa represent a minority, as they are alike. The fact that the creature is different yet human like, symbolizes how privileged people viewed minorities at the time. The point of the monster is simply to symbolize how we sometimes view other people that are different from us.

    The message of the story is this: You view other people that are different from yourself as "monsters" if you don't try to understand them. However, if you try to understand people who are different from yourself, then you will see that we are basically all alike even though we look different.

    I think this movie was brilliant and very clever. Guillermo Del Toro did a great job. It is definitely a movie worth watching.

    This is my point of view and I hope that you found this helpful.
  • The beauty with which Guillermo del Toro narrates this film offers us a beautiful story of a love between a woman and a monster. It is worth highlighting the essential performance of Sally Hawkins as Elisa and Doug Jones as the amphibian man. The photography and music composed by Alexandre Desplat manage to create an underwater experience that pays homage to classic cinema and also manages to captivate and identify with each of the characters. The shape of the water is without a doubt a beautiful movie in all its aspects and that manages to impact us with its highly detailed aesthetics and majestic direction. 1 000/1 000
  • siderite14 March 2018
    The film starts with an interesting premise: during the Cold War era, a US government research center has captured a strange amphibious creature and the protagonist is a mute cleaning lady. From the beginning the story overflows with symbols if intolerance: towards women, towards handicapped people, black people, amphibious people, immigrants, gays, old people, and so on and so on. It's like it's trying to check all the boxes, see how many it gets in a single row. But while it does this, the story itself just stalls. This is a two hour long movie in which nothing much happens. It shows intolerance, but doesn't go anywhere with it. Yes, we know people are assholes and that during that era, they were slightly worse than now. It does nothing for the plot, which is predictable and boring.

    The bad man is reminiscent of Pan's Labyrinth villain and the main character a girl with an active imagination, but it is way slower and more poorly executed than Pan's. It is clearly a worse movie than that was. To put it mildly, I am at a loss for why this film won Best Picture. It was visually interesting, but you couldn't take it seriously. It went from metaphor to reality with no regard to the previous context. A villain that seemed to not have a purpose other than being obtuse and evil, a woman who after learning that the creature has bit two fingers off a man's hand goes near it and offers it food from her own hand, a black best friend who's only role is to gossip about her irrelevant husband, some Russian spies that seem more interested in food than in spying, the list goes on and on. It's not like the actors didn't do a good job, it's not that the direction or the sets were faulty, but the story itself was nothing more than a long slow cliche.
  • So much appealed to me about 'The Shape of Water'. The trailer and story captivated me, Guillermo Del Toro has done some great work prior (especially one of my favourite films 'Pan's Labyrinth'), the critical acclaim and numerous wins and nominations (including a whopping thirteen Oscar nominations as we speak) promised so much as did the talented cast and having Alexandre Desplat on board.

    Luckily, 'The Shape of Water' didn't disappoint me at all. For me, it's one of Del Toro's best and his best since 'Pan's Labyrinth'. It's a beautifully transfixing adult fairy tale with elements of 'Beauty and the Beast', 'Amelie' and 'Creature from the Black Lagoon', while showing a real sense of unsettlement and affectionate nostalgia from film and music from the golden age.

    Everything here absorbs, right from the visually gorgeous, musically hauntingly beautiful and really quite wondrous opening to the genuinely unnervingly tense and powerful, in emotion and violent action, climax. The love story is very touching and has a lot of heart, the conflict provided by the as ice cold monster a villain as one can get brings chills up the spine, Elisa and Zelda's friendship has warmth and that between Elisa and Giles has charm and poignancy.

    'The Shape of Water' is one of the best-looking films of the year bar none. There is a real fairy-tale, in both sheer other-worldly beauty and sometimes unsettlingly nightmarish, look to the cinematography. The production and costume design are meticulously detailed, evocative (one really is taken back to the Cold War's look and atmosphere) and atmospheric, while the creature design clearly looked like a lot of care and effort went into it and the editing has a natural and cohesive flow.

    Alexandre Desplat's music score is ethereal and hauntingly beautiful, especially so in the opening scene, one of the best scored opening scenes of the year. The vivid sound mixing and editing helps it a lot, and the pre-existing music also makes a positive impression with the rendition of "You Never Know" touching the soul and haunting the mind. 'The Shape of Water' is one of the best examples of Del Toro's mastery of story-telling when the material is particularly good, like it is here and in 'Pan's Labyrinth', with all the different elements ideally balanced and just as strong individually.

    Regarding the script, it's tightly structured, poetic, poignant, nostalgic, thought-provoking and with nothing inconsequential. What is done with the monster is a revelation, not just because the design is so rich in detail, expressive and real but Doug Jones masterfully brings nuances, chills and heartfelt emotion and makes the monster much more than a creature design that looks good but with no soul.

    Can't fault the acting either. Sally Hawkins is one of the finest recent examples of conveying so many different emotions and nuances without saying a word, my personal favourite as of now of the nominees for this year's Best Actress Oscar category (yes even more so than Frances McDormand for 'Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri').

    Octavia Spencer is humorously earthy and sympathetic and warmth and sincerity shines through every aspect of Richard Jenkins' performance. Michael Shannon has rarely been creepier than he is here and Michael Stuhlbarg is also fine.

    In summary, unsettling and truly beautiful, one of the year's must sees. 10/10 Bethany Cox
  • It is the mid-1960s. Elisa is mute, and a cleaner at a US government experiment facility. Her life is quite mundane and unfulfilled. Then the facility starts on a new project: the US government has captured a man-fish hybrid in South America and now they are seeing if the creature's unique physiology could have some uses for humans, especially for astronauts. Elisa becomes attached to the creature.

    The winner of Best Picture at the 2018 Oscars, though difficult to see why. A pretty basic movie - a linear romantic drama with one-dimensional characters, cartoonish, badness-laid-on-so-thick-it's-laughable villains, conventional plot development and a fairly predictable ending. It's not that profound or original in its themes or development (unless the viewer has only seen a handful of movies in their life) - quite dumbed-down (though that might be more a reflection of modern audiences than anything else). If it wasn't for the excellent CGI, the sentimentality, the slickness of the plot development and some of the performances it would be just another B-grade creature feature.

    Part of the problem is that director Guillermo del Toro tries to steer a path between fairy tale and gritty drama, and thus ends up with something that is tonally jarring and inconsistent. The movie from the start has a light, airy feel, the ideal set up for a sweet, all-ages drama. There's even some funny moments to help this along. Yet, interspersed with the lightness are several adult-orientated scenes. Even as the movie becomes darker, bloodier and grittier, del Toro still tries to cling to the fairy tale side.

    Made as a plain fairy tale-like drama, suitable for all ages, this would have worked a whole lot better.

    Not that it's that bad though. The movie moves at a decent pace and is quite entertaining. There is a decent level of intrigue and tension and Sally Hawkins puts in a great performance as Elisa.
  • Please lower your gun and feel the shape of the atmosphere. Don't learn the logic, but submerge in the water.

    All the bad reviews. I love it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The Shape of Water opens with a whimsical, murky underwater scene in a submerged apartment, with fishes swimming around floating furniture as if in an aquarium. A character narrates about a "fair prince's reign" and a princess without a voice as we see a woman floating above her sofa in a sleeping pose; drowned passively and unaware while catching some Z's.

    Sirens scream outside Elisa's window and she draws a bath. She makes a high cholesterol lunch of three boiled eggs (probably not a great plan...) and sets an egg timer in the bathroom, noting several long (and meticulously placed) scars on her throat in the mirror - she then pleasures herself in the bath. It's healthy and natural and normal and it's delightfully embarrassing.

    At her neighbor, Giles' place we learn Elisa's mute and the scars on her neck seem to make sense now. Giles notes the smell of cocoa in the air from a fire at the chocolate factory: "tragedy and delight, hand in hand". Alone in the hall on the way out, Elisa does a whimsical little tap dance in her particularly highly polished black shoes, like Shirley Temple on TV. She has a unique exuberance and she seems to be in another world; she must be a woman of wonderment.

    Elisa works as a custodian at a government facility with Zelda, her talkative coworker. As they're cleaning in a dank room with a water tank a "sensitive asset" is brought in; a sea creature in a pressure tank. Elisa approaches the tank and taps gently on the glass and the creature inside bashes the windows. They're rushed out.

    Back at Giles' place, the key lime pie he bought is sordid and turns Elisa's tongue green. She should probably just spit that cloying green fakeness out.

    At work they're cleaning the men's room when security man, Strickland enters the room with a bloodied truncheon. He pisses in front of them at the urinal while rendering a full description of the cherished cattle-prod, specifically refusing to wash his hands afterward. He is very meticulously offensive. Later, he's seen in the hall bleeding profusely from his hand. They're called in to clean a bloody mess in the fish room where Elisa finds two of his fingers, bitten off. Ich.

    At the advertising firm where he works on Contingency basis as an illustrator, Giles is advised that the Happy Family piece he's presenting will have to change. The Jell-O will have to be green; green is the future now - it's a new concept.

    Elisa decides to have lunch with the creature. She enters the tank room alone, sits at the edge of the open aquarium and offers a hardboiled egg. The fish thing emerges from the water imposingly, makes gurgly noises, and then postures super-aggressively when she makes a quick movement. She backs down and lays the egg on the ledge, calling it "egg" in sign language. The creature makes noises, snatches the egg, and dives back into the water.

    Strickland is a pressure tank filled with prejudice and self-loathing. He has a lousy relationship with his family and detests being home. After the kids go off to school he washes his hands as required by his wife, she sniffs his hand to confirm cleanliness and then unbuttons her dress and hauls her breast out, putting his hand on it. During sex he strokes her face dumbly with his wounded hand (with sewn-on fingers), then when she protests that his hand is bleeding on her he puts his bleeding hand over her mouth, saying "Don't talk... Silence" It's all very meticulously offensive.

    Entertainment is a must on a second date, so Elisa brings a record player into the tank room to play music while they dine. As a record plays, she signs "music". It signs "music" back. They have a certain simpatico. Like the whirlwind rush of new love it's suddenly a thing now. We see Elisa daydreaming romantically, bringing more records into the tank room, and performing a delightful dance for It while mopping. It's every bit as charming as the old B&W musicals. Only, green.

    A blind spot can be created, and Elisa makes another great plan as she smokes a cigarette, eyeing the upturned camera at the loading dock.

    We feel bad for the fish thing when we see Strickland pointlessly abusing It. He must be bad. He wants to vivisect It of course, but a scientist (who's also a Russian spy) wants to study It and seems to feel for It. Elisa tries to enlist Giles' help to get It out of the facility. She says It accepts her as she is; It doesn't know how she is "incomplete". We feel bad for her; she must be a woman of wounds. Giles ultimately agrees to help get the creature out of the facility because Elisa "needs" It.

    Strickland is stalking Elisa now. He methodically creates a small water spill and has Elisa brought into the office to clean it. He makes his objective clear with a heavy dose of sexual harassment, saying she's not much to look at but he likes her scars and the fact that she can't speak; it gets him going. He seems genuine. She runs out as he says "I bet I could make you squawk a little". He is very sincerely offensive.

    Strickland's reading (and distorting) "The Power of Positive Thinking". This seems to show how manipulative Strickland is, but it doesn't, really.

    As Elisa executes her amphibian extraction mission she gets some unexpected help from the Russian scientist and Zelda (who first rightly implies that she's out of her mind). Per the scientist's advisement, the fish thing apparently eats raw meat. Ich.

    After the escape, Elisa and Giles put the fish thing in her bathtub (she'd better scrub that down with bleach after they figure out what to do with It...). The next day, Elisa and Zelda go to work where they'll have to act like Normal and Giles chats with the creature in a charming one-sided heart-to-heart talk. Then the creature gruesomely savages one of the cats in a bloody spectacle of heinous barbarity and gashes Giles' forearm as It escapes. But that's OK because It's a wild animal after all...

    Strickland calls Elisa and Zelda into his office to interrogate and insult them and Elisa signs "F- you". He can't tell what she said but we're proud of her for standing up to him anyway. She must be a woman of will. She later overlooks the savaged cat and desperately searches for her 'needed' creature, finding It in the cinema by following a trail left by Its bloodied claw-flippers. They experience a touching connection. Back home, the creature has a contradictory change of character, behaving like a pet now. It lays low, sliming Giles charmingly in an oopsy-doopsy, flippy-floppy 'lets-make-up' session. Well, it must be water under the bridge after all that sloppy green 'cuteness'.

    So then Elisa decides to have SEX with the creature - she disrobes and steps into the bathtub with It. But that's OK because she does this kind of activity in the bath all the time after all... It's healthy and natural and normal and it's delightfully embarrassing.

    The next morning Elisa daydreams whimsically on the bus. It's so very romantic and she's so delightfully vivacious now; she's even wearing a pair of sexy red pumps. When Zelda wonders how it happened (meaning how it was even possible) (as opposed to why would anyone ever...) Elisa super-cutely explains that It has a sheath that retracts to reveal... well, you know... The creature is apparently exceptionally 'complete'.

    Elisa whimsically creates a huge soggy mess, flooding the bathroom with water so she can have a touching naked connection with the creature, submerged. Water runs down into the cinema and the apartment is flooded when Giles opens the bathroom door, but that's OK because it's delightful and it probably just won't cause water damage and black rot in the walls. Anything is impossible in the movies...

    The fish thing can just suddenly heal wounds as if by magic, so It heals Giles' arm but strangely doesn't bring their savaged cat back from the dead. Sadly, It starts having a problem, though. It doesn't seem like Ich, but Its scales are sloughing off in a slimy way. It's apparently going off, but they don't seem to notice the smell... They'd better wash their hands after handling It...

    Elisa bothers to place buckets under water leaks from the rain and the creature sits at the table proper, preparing to eat boiled eggs. It makes noises and signs "egg". Elisa nods. They have a certain simpatico. She starts signing some other words but It's inattentive and doesn't understand. She then has a delightful fantasy in B&W that she's singing and dancing with It onstage like in an old musical. Its gills vent in time to the music.

    The Russian scientist is shot by his comrades, who Strickland then shoots down so he can torture the scientist. He drags him by the bloody gunshot hole in his cheek, tazes him with the electric cattle prod, and grips him brutally by the gunshot wound in his gut. The scientist has no information; it's a gory torture session made 'necessary' by how very bad Strickland must be.

    Elisa and Giles take the creature to the docks to release It into the sea. Strickland catches up with them, clocks Giles, and shoots the creature and Elisa. The creature then imposingly rises to Its feet and simply just wipes Its gunshot wounds away because It can just do that. Strickland says "F-... You are a god" and It does the 'godlike' thing and slashes his throat with Its claws.

    The "fair prince" then jumps into the water with Elisa (who is dead) and 'magically' transforms her with a kiss, ending the curse that had made her a lowly human. The scars on her neck become (meticulously placed) gills and she starts to breathe like a fish underwater. Apparently undeserving of a good relationship with one of her own kind and fated otherwise to a premature death, she is 'completed' now by the unbelievable transformation of abuse injuries into a survival mechanism, joined dependently to her 'needed' creature, and prepared in this way for her 'deliverance' into Its domain: a cold, inhuman world of water.
  • While I'm not into 'creature from the deep' type movies, this is not really one of those. It is more of a love story like I've never seen before...

    There really wasn't any room for 'spectacular' acting, though the whole cast did their job delivering the character they were assigned.

    The wardrobe and props departments also did a great job giving the film a 1950s type of look and feel. The same should also be said of the film crew.

    But, back to the story...

    There were a couple of times I expected a completely different reaction from characters (no spoilers). However the reactions were delivered smoothly, so smoothly, in fact, that they didn't bother me, or make me 'dwell' for longer than a moment.

    Like I said near the beginning, it is a love story, of sorts, with a sci-fi / creature from the deep sort of twist to it, and, once again, no spoilers, there is a betrayal that goes on, but a betrayal that has no pain...

    There is no reason this film should get less than a 7 out of ten.

    A film truly worth watching, no matter what you prefer. It has a story that it delivers, and a story that is easily enjoyed.

    And, probably best watched by mature audiences :)
  • saimiftikhar25 July 2018
    People, this is a fairy tale. Stop trying to find logic in it. If you don't like fairy tales, go play brain games.
  • Briefly, a beautiful piece of work. Gorgeous sets, costumes colors, monsters and music. The relationships are interesting and the chemistry is wonderful however, the story is so predictable. Regardless of that it is a sight to behold and worth a watch.
  • I usually love Del Toro's movies, his weird gothic fantasy style usually impresses me. But i dont see the hype around this movie, not only is it a boring love story, i cant seem to escape the fact that she falls in love with a fish man, forget that she is a weird confused sad little girl who lives a mundane life, i doubt thats reason enough to fall in love with a fish that communicates like a family pet, i thought it was silly and most definitely out there, the fact it won oscars baffles me, these critics giving their artistic veiws to us mere mortals, its like those pompous art goers who try to justify paying millions for something that looks like a 4 year old doodled while painting at nursery.
  • The Shape of Water, the Oscar winning film about an unlikely love between a humanoid amphibian and a mute woman set in the early 1960's. The movie was greatly directed by director and screenwriter Guillermo Del Toro and acted by award winning actress Sally Hawkins with supporting actress Octavia Spencer. The movie is full of hope and desire as the lead characters explore love in a unique way that is different and unnatural. The movie will have you shed tears, in suspense, and thrilled by shocking twists and events.

    "Unable to perceive the shape of you, I find you all around me / Your presence fills my eyes with your love, It humbles my heart, For you are everywhere." -Giles, The Shape of Water
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I was stunned this year when they announced the winner for the best picture category at the Oscars. How could it possibly be that a movie whose description reads like a low budget horror film from the fifties could win top prize? And from a director known for movies filled with comic book heroes, monsters, ghosts and tales of fantasy? And yet it happened. Now that movie makes its way to disc.

    The film takes place in the early 1960s in a government run research facility. Unlike most places we've seen in the past this location actually employs people to do real every day jobs like clean the place up. Elisa Esposito (Sally Hawkins) is a young mute woman who works the janitorial staff alongside her friend Zelda Fuller (Octavia Spencer). When not working she shares an apartment over a movie theater with her advertising artist best friend Giles (Richard Jenkins).

    Something big is going on at the facility with the arrival of several people. First is a scientists named Dr. Hoffstetler (Michael Stuhlbarg), followed by special agent Richard Strickland (Michael Shannon). The third arrival shows up in a tank, an amphibious being or fish man played wonderfully by Doug Jones. Captured in South America by Strickland the two have an adversarial disposition to one another.

    But Elisa sees something the others don't in the amphibian man. She sees a kindred spirit, another person who is different from the rest and ridiculed or tortured for it. Seeing the cattle prod tipped in blood used by Strickland on the creature she decides to reach out to it instead. She shares her lunch with the creature, nothing more than hard boiled eggs, but in treating it kindly she breaks through to him.

    None of this is noticed by the research team. She, like several characters in the film, are ghostlike non-entities, people who are there but never seen by those they work among. The only person who witnesses her communicating with the creature is Hoffstetler. But he won't reveal this. Why? Because he's a Russian spy sent to gather information and possibly steal the creature if possible.

    The story fluctuates between the tenderness and bond that forms between Elisa and the creature, the mean spirited, bitter and cruel treatment that Strickland pushes on any and every one (including his wife) and the characters found in the periphery here. Each contributes something to the forward movement of the story. Giles is gay and shunned but the film doesn't focus on that. Blacks are turned away from a restaurant he visits. Zelda is talked down to by her husband.

    Halfway through the film the decision is made to destroy the creature. Elisa and her friends set out to rescue him before that can happen. They succeed and take him to her apartment where she keeps him in the bathtub. It is here that her fondness for the creature morphs into not just affection but love as the couple become intimate with one another. It's become one of the more controversial moments in the film but needn't be coming off as more natural than most love scenes in films these days.

    But we know that the bad guy, Strickland, will eventually be pushed to become the evil government force that thinks only of killing anything they find. It's a slow buildup to that point and when it happens in the third act you know something will change the lives of all involved before the final reel.

    I've always been a big fan of Guillermo del Toro. While I've missed one or two of his films, I've yet to see one that I thought was bad. He has a visual style all his own, one that brings the fantasy realms to the screen and makes them believable. He does that here again creating a world, a creature and a romance between species that makes sense if that's possible. A fan of monster movies he turns the tables here making the hero the monster and the monster the hero. And it works incredibly well.

    The acting here by all involved is great as well. Kudos must go to Sally Hawkins for her bringing life to a character who has no way of speaking except with her hands, face and body language. She does so with skill. And while he may be ignored consistently by the Academy Doug Jones brings to life a creature that emotes through his body like no one else can. He's done this time and time again and never gets recognized for it. Shame on those who think the only way an actor acts is through the language they project.

    In the end the movie may not be for everyone. There is nudity and sexual situation that mean the kids can't sit in while you watch it. But for adults who understand the circumstances the story revolves around and who can find the romance beneath the makeu
  • JennFilms16 February 2018
    This film was extremely imaginative and gorgeously shot. At the heart of it, the film is about a girl who falls in love with a fish. But it adds so many gorgeous elements to it to make it feel like you are watching an epic. The acting is phenominal, especially Sally Hawkins and Richard Jenkins. Worth checking out!
  • Guillermo Del Toro's leaving the Pacific Rim pays off. Science fiction is not always about action. Please do not hope for any of it. Enjoy the complexity of the situation.
  • jellejeremiah3 April 2018
    Typical for a beautiful movie to be underrated by most people. The difference in meta and user score was to be expected.

    In my experience, this movie was captivating from the first scene and ended on a high note, with a simple frame, music and quote. Del Toro takes you on a journey, that never goes full-blown fantasy. The minor details in both film and music are sublime. It really brings the story to life. In my opinion, this is one of those movies that don't need any questions. You have to experience is.

    Perhaps it is a story that is only enjoyable for people that daydream. The ambiance and message are set up in a way, a hopeless romantic could feast on for days. Seeing as most Hollywood movies are complete rubbish, this one really shows what a movie is capable of. Bringing the love of a celebrated director on screen. Go see this movie!
  • I like a good story and here we have a good story being told. It helps if you are a fan of the Creature From the Black Lagoon and the sequels. Hey, the guy only wanted some company and was willing to do what it takes to get some. In this movie, we are introduced to a sort of fairy tale telling of the world of what if and what could be which exceeds our thoughts but feeds the imaginations. There were a couple of sex scenes that I thought were not necessary at all and one wonders why they are in this? With them gone, this could have taken its place with Beauty and the Beast and brought the lessons to children more. It also ran a little long but for those that like a good build-up they wont' be disappointed. When watching this movie, if one believes there are no accidents, that the heart can prevail by its own rules and not giving up allows it to do so then a treat awaits. The bad guy in this movie was a little over the top and the premise of what to do with the "creature" doesn't pass common sense but it doesn't have to either. The movie still prevails. The shape of this water....
  • The latest beautiful film by the dark fairy tale fantasy director Guillermo del Toro reminds me of hearing 40 year olds talk about what they got out of going to college . It seems that you get what you put into it. I'd claim the same goes for this collective homage film that will certainly open your eyes through many theatrical portals. I found an immediate thought of the French movie "Amelie" due to the quiet nature of our protagonist and the smart and artful use of color. It's a romantic viewing for those who appreciate such things and yearn for a better nature in ourselves. This 1960's period piece, set in Baltimore, Maryland, certainly doesn't look like any John Waters film I ever saw, but the small city with a chip on it's shoulder is carried well by the outsider and monster of the movie played by Michael Shannon. Yes, his characters' depth won't go past wading levels, but the fim isn't about character depth, and the story is the star. The movie has a collective voice of characters who, although silenced by the social indignities of that time, rose above themselves for the greater good. Octavia Spencer is understated but is our eyes as an outsider and our conscience as a friend. The only person who this doesn't hold true is Elisa, our protagonist, part mousey mute and part "quite female" to say the least. She's daring on a number of issues, but it feels as for personal gain, despite the pure heart angle. I will watch this again to see if I come away with that same sentiment.

    The "asset" is more reminicent of the Watchmans' Dr. Manhattan in it's perfect masculine form, allowing the romance to be "somewhat" believable, but it does appear one-sided for the majority of the film, so not sure how to handle the folks grabbing their pitchforks about their time with the film. If you love film beauty and are willing to spend time away from your everyday troubles, this flick works in it's own way. Predictable, sure, but vividly engaging!
  • Everything was on point. I really loved how the story panned out. The creature was well designed, unlike most monster movies they actually hinted us answers about the creature. Except there were lame decision making cliché sprinkled all over. Other than that, i couldn't complain more. Story could've been much more vast. The 60s backdrop was amazing too. People shouldn't miss this movie. Beast and beauty movies always have a flamboyant effect on me.
  • stevekeyes3 April 2018
    Simply a great film and for those that gave it a low score they've never been in love. The film score nails it too, go see and it will touch you.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Diabetics beware, you're in for a saccharine flavoured heap of mush.

    The Shape of Water was directed/created by Guillermo Del Toro best known for creepy and violent films such as Pan's Labyrinth and more mainstream writings such as Hellboy and The Hobbit. For some reason he has had a dose of the lovestrucks and written a film that is basically Amelie meets Creature from the Black Lagoon. There are a couple of questionable violent scenes (torturing a dying man by dragging him around via a bullet wound to the cheek had a touch of the old GDT that we know and love) but the plot literally has no surprises whatsoever. I picked the minor twist about 10 minutes in, and spent the second half of the film waiting for it to be over.

    I am sorry to say the only interesting part was the reveal (not literally) of the sea creature's penis via the main character's description which is frankly hilarious.

    Octavia Spencer does a fantastic job of playing herself (Was this woman born middle aged?) but let's face it we love her anyway. I would love her to be my best friend, she's a hoot.

    Michael Shannon (whom I remember from Take Shelter and Boardwalk Empire) plays a creepy bad guy in a way that makes me never want to have him around for Christmas lunch. Why does he always play someone sexually awkward? I pray we'll never find out.

    I was most disappointed that unlike Pan's Labyrinth and some of the other films GDT has made it's not set in a fantastical different world. It's basically the 1950s cold war era in USA with no real pretense of being anything but. I was hoping for a magical realism, but other than the creature, there's no otherworldliness to it.

    I am a solid romantic, but I found the plot so saccharine that it made me feel nauseous. There is also a sudden musical number that almost had me running for the aisle, and my sister desperate to see my husband's face (He's allergic to musicals generally). Apart from this light relief, I couldn't wait to get out of there.

    I am pretty alone in this opinion, our party was split between 3 people who loved it, and my husband and I who hated it. Maybe if I hadn't seen other GDT films I would have liked it more. My husband also thought the trailer completely misrepresented what he expected from the film. So maybe we were in the wrong movie. But I think romance lovers won't like the art house element, and art house/GDT fans won't like this film. So I think commercially it will be hard to place.
  • Honestly it was a really good movie. It has a very childish theme to it, but in an adult content setting. Something you wouldn't expect to work, but it did.

    I don't get the bad reviews. It was a different kind of movie with a happy ending that delivered a pretty good message that love knows no bounds. Yeah the fish man wasn't the most attractive, but the main character didn't care about that. They were both lacking something and they gave each other what the other was missing.

    It was a super sweet movie and I even got to laugh a couple of times. It deserves the Oscars it got and everyone who disagrees honestly just needs to get their heads out of their butts. This isn't a movie that goes "YAY BEASTIALITY" it's a movie that promotes love past looks.
An error has occured. Please try again.