Add a Review

  • Very well-done documentary about small (2,651st largest bank in the U.S. at the time) family bank in Chinatown New York prosecuted for financial crimes after 2008, has interviews with all the major players (bank employees/owners, prosecutors, defense attorneys, jurors, audio from witnesses, etc.)

    Absolutely head-scratching as to why the D.A. thought this was a good place to satisfy public outrage over the Great Recession (politics and racism are hinted at but not fully explored). (I do wish this angle has been pursued in more depth.)

    Basic plot: low-level employees are fleecing home buyers into giving them cash fees and then falsifying their loan applications so they get approved by higher-ups, the government decides this is evidence of a systematic conspiracy and tries to go after the bank itself (this despite it having an extremely low default rate, which makes it strange that Fannie Mae is named the defendant in the case because overall it got much more money from this bank proportionally than from thousands of others, particularly the giant ones who not only didn't get prosecuted but actually got bailouts (courtesy of you and me)).

    Also shows incredible scenes such as the bank employees shackled together in a chain gang and paraded into the courthouse in front of news cameras (which by all accounts is an unheard-of practice nowadays); the Manhattan D.A. (Cyrus Vance Jr.) and one of his underlings ("Polly Greenberg" iirc) are both masterful in denying any kind of prejudicial motivation in selecting and prosecuting Abacus (the case took five years and cost taxpayers ten million USD and resulted in *zero* convictions).

    Anyone need anymore evidence that giant corporations run this country? Anyone?
  • johnsonalg19 October 2016
    This film received a standing ovation at the Chicago International Film Festival. At the Q and A after the film the family was as genuine as in the movie. Not only is this a story about government picking on the small guy (small by banking standards) but also a nice movie about immigration and family values. The entire movie was shot while filmmaker Steve James (Hoop Dreams) was unaware if the family or bank would be found innocent or guilty of mortgage fraud. Unfortunately the court proceedings are represented by paintings and live audio, but you still get the feeling of being in the courtroom. Even a couple of jurors are interviewed. Do not expect to sit on the edge of your seat with anxiety but a very interesting, thoughtful film
  • I don't know if you've heard, but the American justice system is probably too cozy with the Big Banks. The beauty of this little doc is that it puts a personal face on the decidedly impersonal numbers, giving a portrait of a family unjustly taking the fall for corporations much worse than them. Especially love the natural comparison it makes to It's a Wonderful Life...because maybe it's not always that wonderful.
  • 6/2/18. Another perspective on the 2008 financial debacle. While watching this, you have to wonder if this Chinese-run bank wasn't singled out to be the scapegoat for the what happened during the 2008 Great Recession. Just seemed like an easy target to get picked on, while the mega-banks got away with murder. Granted they had their problems with record-keeping, but they weren't the only ones. So, watch this with that in mind. Oscar-nominated and worth catching.
  • ryanlaurencecole11 February 2018
    I want to be careful to ensure my opinion of the doc isn't just my opinion of the subject. I don't think the subjects of the doc are admirable or deserve to be felt sorry for. The doc however, does a good job of introducing the players and explaining each of their association with the bank and family who runs it. I found myself getting distracted by the numerous scenes showing the family talking over each other and communicating nothing. I wanted to know more about the the effect on the trial on the community instead. Although this isn't my favourite doc of the year, I certainly think it's worth a watch.
  • UNBELIEVABLE! I have never written a review but feel compelled to by the emotional response and anger this documentary has stirred. It is a well-done documentary, and I guess I am just shocked by its content.

    I have studied the 2008 financial crisis extensively. I had no idea this happened. The US government and the New York DA's office should be absolutely ashamed. The fact that this happened makes me disappointed in my government. Part of me is holding some hope that the documentary is extremely biased and one sided (though I do not believe this is true). It makes me physically ill to think that the large financial institutions such as Citi Group, Bank of America, JP Morgan, etc., got away with what they did in causing the financial crisis and our government spent its resources persecuting this small family run community bank. Unbelievable.
  • DrNick118 April 2018
    Warning: Spoilers
    Documentary that doubles as a hagiography of a family of directors of a small Chinatown bank chain as they are brought up on mortgage fraud charges for wholesale fabrication of mortgage banking records sold on to Fannie Mae. They are proposed to be the victims of awful low level employee loan officers who fabricated and extorted the clients whose records they helped fabricate. What it actually shows is a family of shady bank directors who successfully firewalled themselves (take a page from Stevie Cohen!) from criminal guilt. Congratulations. A systemic problem that large wasn't found because they didn't want it found.

    There's a few words about tax fraud in this film but the subject passes by quickly. Make no mistake though, that is the scam going on here. The default rates on these loans was so low because the applicants actually made much more money and/or had assets that they never paid taxes on. Possibly kept in the Abacus Bank security deposit vaults shown early in the film. The gift note is mentioned prominently in the film, a note where a relative or person connected to the borrower promises a money transfer and this promissory note is then added to the mortgage file. If the makers of this film were really interested in what actually was happening at Abacus, a fascinating thing to do would have been to try and find the authors of these notes. I suspect they wouldn't find many, and that most of these promissory notes were to cover for mortgage applicants pulling their own unreported money out of whatever bolthole they had it shoved into.

    Was the prosecution and dog and pony show of dragging people in chains worth it? In hindsight, probably not, but that doesn't change the amount of shade going on at Abacus.
  • Abacus: Small Enough to Jail is a suspenseful David v. Goliath documentary of family loyalty and stubborn courage facing a gigantic government agency and an ego to match. As follows: Tom Sung emigrated from China at 16 and became in time a citizen, a successful lawyer and a resident of upscale Connecticut. Nevertheless he noticed that 'establishment' banks were happy to take his deposits, but when it came to getting a loan, he didn't, as the saying went in the hateful days of the racist Exclusion Act, 'have a Chinaman's chance.' Sung then took a chance and started his own bank—Abacus Federal Savings. His timing was perfect: new immigration laws in the 1960s meant Chinatown soon had a] plenty of customers for Abacus and b] something besides Cantonese restaurants. He was a genuine positive force among the Chinese population, admired and respected by all. Then about a decade ago low-ranking Abacus personnel were caught falsifying mortgage applications; they were immediately sacked and their misdeeds reported to feds, as required. Mistake, as it turned out. The subprime- mortgage crisis was big news: until then, few Americans used the word 'trillion' for anything but the national debt or the distance from here to Alpha Centauri. Villains included Citibank, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and while some were fined, no one went to jail and most bonuses were paid as usual. Unfortunately for Abacus, new-minted New York D.A. Cyrus Vance Jr., who was as hungry for publicity as NY's Sen. Charles Schumer, saw a chance for headlines and photo ops. Seeking a halo as the sole public avenger of the crisis, Vance charged Abacus with 80 counts of criminal wrongdoing, launching a court battle that ran five years and cost $10 million. Although the major villains had got off lightly as being 'too big to fail,' Vance's target was indeed 'small enough to jail': in size, Abacus was 2600th among U.S. banks. About the size, as it turned out, of David. This is an excellent documentary, suspenseful but lightened with some bursts of humor among the Sung family as they fight for the reputations and their principles.
  • This documentary had me fuming. The Too Big to Fail Banks got off scot-free, and actually made money from the crisis they created. Meanwhile, a bank catering to a migrant community, who tries to do the right thing gets screwed by an overzealous, politically motivated DA.
  • Steve James is a very famous documentarian who was robbed when his master work "Hoop Dreams" was inexplicably ignored by the Oscars in the Best Documentary Feature category in 1994. His later films included "Stevie", "The Interrupters" and the moving record of Roger Ebert's last days, "Life Itself". And now finally the film that brought James his first nomination for Best Documentary Feature.

    "Abacus: Small Enough to Jail" is an excellent documentary that centers on the Abacus Federal Savings Bank, a family-owned community bank in Manhattan's Chinatown which became the only bank to actually face criminal charges following the 2007 mortgage crisis - and only because it was deemed not 'too big to fail', an incredible injustice by the U.S. Justice Department merely looking for a scapegoat. But the film is not primarily socio-political; it is, in fact, a 'David vs. Goliath' story of the court battle of the Asian family's defense for their honor against the gigantic U.S. government, and, without shying away from showing the family's internal squabbles and moments of weakness, the film documents the difficult daily sacrifices necessary for them to stand up for their principles.

    Perhaps some will find this too much a 'standard' documentary, but I feel the story and characters interesting enough not to necessitate a stylistic 'hyping up', and, as is, the film perfectly captures its time and place while keeping us on the edge of our seats until the final verdict. Critic Matt Zoller praised the director for "finding the universal within the specific", and for the film creating a portrait of Chinatown as a thriving community that "defines itself in relation to...American culture... but never entirely comfortable or accepted." It is also an inspiring film of an immigrant family who struggles to survive through a conflict that they know is virtually impossible over which to prevail - but still they find they cannot submit to what they see as an injustice they did not come to America for. This is a film I truly loved. Don't miss it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is a well-constructed documentary. You may even enjoy watching it. But I found it incredibly frustrating because *none* of this ever would've happened if Vera Sung hadn't told one of her bank's customers -- who objected to losing a significant downpayment as a result of one of her employee's actions -- to file a complaint at the *police precinct*.

    (You can see this scene at about 13:30 in the Frontline version.)

    By treating this couple as criminal co-conspirators instead of customers, Vera Sung brought this entire thing on her and her family. It's really that simple. And it's unfortunate this fact is completely lost on both the Sungs and the documentarian.

    Years of litigation and a $10 million defense is perhaps a bit steep of a karma price tag, but not far off.
  • This documentary shows you how politically motivated are the justice system. Rather than picking on banks that defrauded American trillions of dollars, they choose to indict a small family bank in Chinatown. T's disgusting when you understand the scope of what the mortgage crisis did to America and not surprising that the only ones prosecuted were Chinese-American.The DAs in this film looks like pompous legal heavy hitter-wannabes tainted by self-righteous vain-glories.
  • Documentaries may be about true stories, but that doesn't mean they can't stir up emotional responses in the viewer. The last documentary I read, about first responders in Aleppo, Syria, made me feel anger against the callousness of governments, and sympathy for the strong and courageous men who have to deal with the consequences. This movie, too, made me rail against not just the enormous insensitivity of my own government, but also just how incompetent it seems to be.

    "Abacus" is the name of a small federally chartered savings bank, with just six branches, operating in New York's Chinatown. It was founded by a Chinese man, born in Shanghai, who immigrated to the United States as a child with his parents. He went to law school and practiced law for a while and then decided to help his native community by operating a bank that could provide credit to other Chinese immigrants who have a native mistrust of banks, government, and pretty much any institution who wants a share of their money. In addition, to operating his bank, successfully for many years, he, with his devoted wife, also raised four amazing daughters, three of which also became lawyers and the fourth, a physician. In short, this was an impressive family - smart and hardworking.

    The documentary camera spends a lot of time with this family, in their offices, and frequently in Chinese restaurants eating big, and appetizing, Chinese meals. We learn that the family is close-knit, loving, and commanding a sense of humor, in addition to being smart and committed to both their family and their community.

    They had to have those qualities, in order to survive an ordeal that lasted five long years and would threaten their bank, their reputations, and their freedom. Abacus Federal Savings Bank was not just the first, but the only bank in all of America that was charged and prosecuted with felony charges as a result of all the financial misbehavior that created the 2008 financial collapse of America. You have to think about that a bit. If, like me, you've been waiting for ten years now for leaders of America's biggest banks (like Chase, Goldman-Sachs, Wells Fargo, and Citibank) to actually pay for the suffering they caused Americans because of the greedy deals they fraudulently packaged and promoted, then this documentary will do nothing except make you angry.

    Instead of going after the banks that were 'too big to fail', instead, Cyrus Vance, the D.A. For the Southern District of New York, instead took the incredibly easy and cowardly approach of trying to punish a small community bank that had, at worst, committed some omissions of proper oversight over some of its employees. The Sung family, and the managers they employed, were definitely guilty of failing to adequately oversee several of their mortgage processors, because, frankly, they trusted them more than they should have. But, after five years of building a case, the assistant district attorney couldn't connect all the dots to prove criminal intent on the part of the owners, she instead developed absurd theories based on cultural misunderstandings and career advancement goals. No doubt she had encouragement from Vance who was desperately looking for an example that would pretend to show that they were indeed doing something about the financial crisis. They found a bank that was "small enough to jail!"

    I've been concerned for some time now about the lack of leadership in our political institutions. It seems we have embraced leaders who are not only just plain stupid, but who also are motivated by the basest of impulses. This movie does nothing to alter that opinion. I give the movie 8 stars for so effectively making me angry!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie is about a community savings bank in NYC servicing the Chinese immigrant community.

    The Bank had a deposit run in 2003 after news broke that a rogue employee had stolen money from the bank, and that run nearly closed the bank and required millions in expenses to fix. Likely as a result of the losses, the bank needed to find offsetting income and focused on real estate lending and then selling loans made to Fannie Mae. The Bank made good income on such activities beginning in 2009.

    At most community banks including Abacus, commissions are paid to lower and mid-level loan officers of the bank to find loans which are profitable to the bank when sold, but unfortunately some greedy and unscrupulous or lowly scrupulous loan officers will coach loan applicants on how to game the system to obtain a loan that they do not qualify. At Abacus, rogue loan officers did exactly that by coaching loan applicants how to lie on applications whether by false income or collateral.

    It is the responsibility of the independent underwriting team at the Bank to check and double check those facts. In this movie, the prosecution tries show that the Bank and senior officers were complicit in making fraudulent loans by not catching the false applications. The trial lasted more than 2 months with witness after witness admitting the information in their application was false though not always with the help of the lower bank officer. So the question was should the bank and higher officers be found guilty of fraud for not catching this. I believe the jury reached the correct verdict, though neither the Sungs nor the DA should be in the clear for noncriminal wrongdoing. The DA for being too ambitious to make a big name for himself and the Sungs for not being more vigilant in their pursuit of the gold. The trial cost the bank and Sungs millions, and as a result the Bank entered a formal agreement with the OCC to improve profitability after losses related to the trial costs. It was interesting that Jill Sung, President did not testify in the trial and that she works in a Chinese bank not being able to speak Chinese. Mrs. Sung was right that banking should have been left to others.
  • snowbird-184457 November 2018
    Wonderful family, and they won the fight against the state
  • Warning: Spoilers
    You can still get justice in America, but it will cost you 10 million.

    What I dont get in addition is that the AG and the government did not pay them back, for false accusation and 5 years of work. It's false accsation from the AG for god's sake.
  • I only got one thought when I watched this film: Suppose your family didn't have that 10 million dollars, or suppose you've only got 8 millions, could you still afford to continue the lawsuit against the American bureaucratic system? Or suppose you didn't have enough financial backbone and your pocket was not deep enough, did it mean that you guys would still have been jailed? So this also means that if don't have enough money to fight in the court, you would have to plead guilty in the end, the injustice would never be overturned? So even you've been exonerated and proved to be innocent, what's next?
  • Highly enjoyable documentary where events unfold in a matter-of-fact way with clarity and extreme realism.
  • chuckplotkin5 April 2020
    9/10
    Great
    I love documentaries and this one is wonderful. Steve James is a master filmmaker and the way he constructs this film is perfect. His film Hoop Dreams is one of my favorites but this one is right up there. The story of this family and all that they go through is a story that people need to see. I hope more people can see this film and be moved like I was.
  • Maybe I'm not the most objective reviewer for this title. I have known Mr. Sung's sister, Mary, since 1959. The conditions under which they fled China were never spoken of. But when Mary turned 80 it seemed like she had reached a rite of passage and now she was ready to open up.

    There's only so much you can put in a documentary. One thing that continued playing through my mind was how successful the family had been before leaving China, and arriving in the U. S. with nothing--except business savvy and a drive to rebuild. Watching the documentary unfold I couldn't help but thinking, "Twice in one lifetime--loss of everything--again." And while I would never wish anything bad for the powers that sought to put Mr. Sung and what he had built out of business, there is this thing called Karma. I remember with clarity a conversation with a friend many years ago: "The mill of the gods grinds exceedingly slow but exceedingly fine." And just one more for the road: "Time wounds all heels."

    And the aftermath? Moving ahead to serve their community. The documentary is a powerful reminder that marginalization along racial lines is alive and, unfortunately, much too well in America.
  • Wow. I can't believe they caught all this on film. What a story. David vs. Goliath. Stop what you're doing now and watch this documentary. You truly can feel what the entire family had to go through. Can't stress enough how good this film is
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This case was pretty cut and dry. I didn't know about it and it's mind boggling that the DA would go after a small bank that told on their own employees. But it was interesting to watch nonetheless and I was glad they were found innocent. Definitely shows how unfair some things are in this country for the bank giants that paid a fee and continue to commit crimes.
  • Is there a better documentary director than Steve James? I don't think so. His films are wonderful and captivating. From Hoop Dreams to the Ebert doc, he shows masterful storytelling skills. I love "Abacus: Small Enough to Jail" - he captures the Asian family's dilemma as they are caught up in the financial scandal. It's a beautiful American story. Bravo Steve!