Unfortunately, "Four Lives" feels like a disappointingly "adequate" & formulaic way to tell an incredibly important story regarding one of the worst institutional failures in modern British policing history - & for something which is as deserving of scathing condemnation as this, upon failing to rightfully tear multiple chunks out of the Met & its deteriorating credibility / reputation, the BBC's toothless dramatisation lacks the bold, scornful bite that it should've ideally possessed.
I'm not saying it's bad but after watching a groundbreaking, provocative series like "It's A Sin" (which, in a bittersweet combination, made the stories of young gay men about more than just their tragic & premature deaths, celebrating the individuality of those caught up in events & the beauty of their fleeting lives whilst balancing that happiness with politics & profound, traumatic loss) I can't help but feel as though there's a far better way to tell the stories of LGBT people than this. Furthermore, I don't really want to see a series shaped around the murderer who perpetrated these unforgivable crimes. It shouldn't be about him & I resented the fact that his featuring ate up so much screen time - because in life, he deprived Anthony, Gabriel, Daniel & Jack of their time; he had no right to do so here & wasn't worth it. Therefore, blotting out such light with needless, grim darkness was an unjustifiable creative decision, in my opinion. His scenes only sought to reaffirm his weird, obsessive, predatory nature but that wasn't warranted because his vulgar actions proved that beyond any reasonable doubt. A superior approach would've arguably been to make those who we lost the main focus - as opposed to reducing them to minor roles that were voyeuristically shot as deceased bodies for the vast majority of their inclusion. Didn't appreciate the gratuitous visualisations of their discoveries, I must admit.
Plus, the fact that the man responsible for these heinous acts (I'm not even going to dignify that thing with a name - doesn't deserve one) is dubbed "the Grindr killer" & the producers clearly haven't been granted permission to use the app on screen (the company evidently doesn't want any negative association) so instead, amendments are consequently made to the plot so that the victims are lured to their doom via random websites - like a couch surfing platform (?) - feels like a particularly offensive dilution, regardless of the reason for making alterations; the 4 men used a gay app for hook ups. You can't water it down or hide / shy away from it because that's not something to be ashamed of. Changing that plot point (very noticeably) - no matter how you try & excuse it - simply adds to the misconception that being on there was shameful & unintentionally comes across as victim blaming. It's a careless error of judgement that prevents this from being respectful & worse, it contradicts the messaging - that they shouldn't have had anything to hide in the beginning... When you can't even say what it was that they were using - out of fear of judgement / hostilities. This is a big issue as the series progresses. I know some heterosexuals will say "why put so much emphasis on gay sex?" But it's undeniably a big part of gay men's identities & integral to why they were there (in that flat) in the first place. Masking that & sweeping it under the carpet is counterproductive / erasure; the exact same harmful ignorance that left vulnerable gay men exposed... Thus, we're actively trying to dispel it.
Additionally, the overall focus of the series is all wrong. This was an attack on the LGBT community, perpetrated by a monster within our own community. That's deeply PERSONAL & quite frankly, a betrayal. The vile creature exploited institutional homophobia & people's ambivalence towards dead gay men, to kill again repeatedly - without consequence. The victims are gay men, living gay lives who were failed solely BECAUSE they were gay - yet the creators have lensed the story through the outside perspective of straight people, looking in? You can see how that doesn't align cohesively? In all fairness, I get *why* they wished to follow the narrative through the eyes of the bereaved families but there's a disconnect between the lives that gay men live & what their straight relatives see, which means their view of things isn't entirely honest. Hence, it's a point of view which lacks authenticity & truthfulness - because it's often omitting the parts where members tend to look away.
Furthermore, there's literally no social commentary, no damning refutation of the corrupt, systematic oppression which enabled these attitudes of complacency within the police force to go unpunished, no daring statements etc. The episodes lightly touch upon wider issues without ever having the guts to address the bigger picture at the heart of why this was allowed to happen. It's all very safe & unchallenging.