This stinker is everything it claims Farenheit is Where to start? I actually started taking notes on the logical inaccuracies and unfounded claims being made in this documentary, but the list just became too long.
A lot of frustrated and bitter individuals get a chance to vent their anger towards Moore, Clinton and everybody else they want to blame for everything that's wrong in the world -- or at least in the US. The weakness of the movie is that they are allowed to do so without having to substantiate any claims, or indeed having any touch with reality.
Example: "Moore says in his film that so and so is true. Well, it isn't." Thanks a lot for clearing that up. Wouldn't it be nice to tell us what IS true instead? And actually explaining WHY? Replacing one unsubstantiated claim with another doesn't make compelling argumentation.
Another weakness of the movie is that they attempt to destroy Moore's explanation for what is going on, without presenting us with an alternative explanation. If Moore is so horribly wrong, than what is right? If oil had nothing to do with the unprovoked and illegal war on Iraq, then what WAS the reason? 9/11? Fictitious WMD's? In a rather puzzling sequence we are being told that the US somehow is in possession of documentation that proves Saddam Hussein had bought off the ENTIRE UN Security Council, so that no action would be taken against Iraq. If such documents exist, they would be very handy for the US to use in order to get the UN's cooperation in Iraq right now. Why they haven't been used I assume can only mean one thing. That the claim is indeed a big fat lie.
Anyway -- even if the UN hadn't been bought off by Saddam as the movie strangely claims, what was the issue at hand that the Security Council was to vote on? It was the question of WMD's and weather or not Iraq posed an imminent threat to the good countries of USA and Great Britain. Now, luckily history has proved that the "corrupt" nations lintel was in fact not as faulty as "good old" US's, and that had the US not decided to commit a war crime and invade Iraq without UN security council support, the war would have been prevented.
Now, in my world, preventing a war from being started based on faulty information is a GOOD thing.
But in the world where this movie was made, suggesting such a thing is worse that treason. Go figure
...and did I mention the movie was also boring?