Rawin1981
Lifetime Total
1+
IMDb Member
17 years
Reviews
London Has Fallen (2016)
Just about a good enough sequel.
Gerald Butler returns as super macho and humourless John McClane clone, Mike Banning in a film that is more at a level of Undersiege 2 (enjoyable but cheap thrills) rather than Die-hard 2 (a sequel with familiarity that rises above its plot faults to become an action film nearly as good as the first outing).
Despite its silly premise of all major world leaders being assassinated in London, accept the U.S Pres' of course, the film has a decent amount of action, but has a flaw not rectified from the first outing.
Many other reviews elsewhere have commented on the bad special effects in both this and it's predecessor Olympus has fallen, and it's a fair criticism, they are bad. It's not even a fair argument to say this is a B movie, it has a budget in the region of 60 million dollars, granted that's not huge, but its higher end B movie. The worst CGI scene (though others may find fault in most of them) is a bridge collapse with a close up of a car going into the water, it looked like one of the CGI vehicle effects from Twister 1996 ( cutting edge 20 years ago) and had no place in a cinematic release in 2016.
Another complaint is the fact that London looks a little under populated at times, but at least the wide camera shots (not close ups) of the landmarks being destroyed hold up pretty well. It's also worth noting visually the film has a drab grey pallet throughout the daytime scenes, one could suspect that is easier to pull off CGI against grey skies, rather than glorious unforgiving sunshine.
The practical action scenes of car chases and gun-shoot outs on the other hand are well staged, well filmed and as ruthlessly efficient as an action movie can be.
The plot is not really worth mentioning, it's Butler kicking ass, lots of chases and very forgettable bad guys, oh and Morgan Freeman Sat in a room with officials looking worried, basically any terrorist take over movie ever made.
It's fun, if lacking humour, apart from a couple of quips, takes itself seriously (not in a good way) and delivers on the stunts, you'll just have to forgive the CGI and go along for the ride to enjoy this.
Decent action, short run time and a destructive level of fun.
Despite its silly premise of all major world leaders being assassinated in London, accept the U.S Pres' of course, the film has a decent amount of action, but has a flaw not rectified from the first outing.
Many other reviews elsewhere have commented on the bad special effects in both this and it's predecessor Olympus has fallen, and it's a fair criticism, they are bad. It's not even a fair argument to say this is a B movie, it has a budget in the region of 60 million dollars, granted that's not huge, but its higher end B movie. The worst CGI scene (though others may find fault in most of them) is a bridge collapse with a close up of a car going into the water, it looked like one of the CGI vehicle effects from Twister 1996 ( cutting edge 20 years ago) and had no place in a cinematic release in 2016.
Another complaint is the fact that London looks a little under populated at times, but at least the wide camera shots (not close ups) of the landmarks being destroyed hold up pretty well. It's also worth noting visually the film has a drab grey pallet throughout the daytime scenes, one could suspect that is easier to pull off CGI against grey skies, rather than glorious unforgiving sunshine.
The practical action scenes of car chases and gun-shoot outs on the other hand are well staged, well filmed and as ruthlessly efficient as an action movie can be.
The plot is not really worth mentioning, it's Butler kicking ass, lots of chases and very forgettable bad guys, oh and Morgan Freeman Sat in a room with officials looking worried, basically any terrorist take over movie ever made.
It's fun, if lacking humour, apart from a couple of quips, takes itself seriously (not in a good way) and delivers on the stunts, you'll just have to forgive the CGI and go along for the ride to enjoy this.
Decent action, short run time and a destructive level of fun.
Criminal (2016)
Mixed but very watchable thriller.
No spoilers if you've seen the trailer (oh and the trailer really is one of those where if you've seen it, then you've seen all the best bits).
Criminal on paper looks like a safe bet, it's produced by super 'B' movie producer Avi Lerner (Olympus/London has fallen, Expendables) has an A list cast and a much worn premise, along the lines of Face Off or Ryan Reynolds lukewarm thriller from 2015 Self/less, involving body/mind swap sci-fi, while being set in a present day surrounding.
The premise, Reynolds young spy has his memory's implanted into Kevin Costners gruff, violent criminal by Dr Tommy Lee Jones, overseen by mostly shouty Spy boss Gary Oldman, to stop some bad men doing bad things with hacking and missiles. Costner's criminal escapes and goes on a bit of a rampage through London whilst also wrestling his own violent nature against Reynolds softer character traits seeping through (so basically he's got a bit of a split personality going on).
In other words it's a silly high concept plot line to effectively have Costner run around a city, beat up some bad guys, get into shoot outs, chases and save the day.
He also along the way tracks down Gal Gadot who is Reynolds wife, and by far the best at delivering anything near a believable character, followed by Tommy Lee Jones (in a very restrained role) in a very mixed bag of a movie.
The film was made for around 30 million dollars, so don't expect much big blockbuster action, although the few car chases and explosions there are, are done decently, the film still at times feels quite cheap. The pace is a little off as well as its a bit of a slog and feels longer than it should at times.
In terms of tone it's violent, full of bad language, and seems to think both of those pass as humour, they don't in the context they are used in this film and are frankly pretty misjudged.
The performances vary, by far the worst being Gary Oldman who whilst normally excellent simply feels like he's in another film altogether at times, he literally shouts his scenes of dialogue at times when it seems a quieter authority would have been better suited.
As for leading man Costner, he's playing a pretty unlikeable fella here, so you would expect the filmmakers to try and inject some charm for an audience to sympathize or grow some kind of emotional attachment, but no Costner simply grunts and swears through most scenes in a gruff lazy drool, he's watchable as always but doesn't have much to work with here, though they do try to have him form a Bond with mother and child later on its quite late in proceedings.
There's some good touches, Gal Gadot brings out a softer side of Costner's character, there's a decent mix of Electro music and the film score used is atmospheric, some of the visuals are decent, shots of London for example and the action scenes whilst only short bursts are clear to see and not confusing and finally there's the thriller plot aspect of the story that plays like a standard spy/action thriller as our (anti) hero must set out to stop the villains and save the girl.
In closing, mixed performances, misplaced serious tone with violent outbursts of humour, some decent action but a bit of misguided film, watchable, not terrible but quite frustrating given the fact there's a better movie in there that could of got out.
3 out of 5.
Criminal on paper looks like a safe bet, it's produced by super 'B' movie producer Avi Lerner (Olympus/London has fallen, Expendables) has an A list cast and a much worn premise, along the lines of Face Off or Ryan Reynolds lukewarm thriller from 2015 Self/less, involving body/mind swap sci-fi, while being set in a present day surrounding.
The premise, Reynolds young spy has his memory's implanted into Kevin Costners gruff, violent criminal by Dr Tommy Lee Jones, overseen by mostly shouty Spy boss Gary Oldman, to stop some bad men doing bad things with hacking and missiles. Costner's criminal escapes and goes on a bit of a rampage through London whilst also wrestling his own violent nature against Reynolds softer character traits seeping through (so basically he's got a bit of a split personality going on).
In other words it's a silly high concept plot line to effectively have Costner run around a city, beat up some bad guys, get into shoot outs, chases and save the day.
He also along the way tracks down Gal Gadot who is Reynolds wife, and by far the best at delivering anything near a believable character, followed by Tommy Lee Jones (in a very restrained role) in a very mixed bag of a movie.
The film was made for around 30 million dollars, so don't expect much big blockbuster action, although the few car chases and explosions there are, are done decently, the film still at times feels quite cheap. The pace is a little off as well as its a bit of a slog and feels longer than it should at times.
In terms of tone it's violent, full of bad language, and seems to think both of those pass as humour, they don't in the context they are used in this film and are frankly pretty misjudged.
The performances vary, by far the worst being Gary Oldman who whilst normally excellent simply feels like he's in another film altogether at times, he literally shouts his scenes of dialogue at times when it seems a quieter authority would have been better suited.
As for leading man Costner, he's playing a pretty unlikeable fella here, so you would expect the filmmakers to try and inject some charm for an audience to sympathize or grow some kind of emotional attachment, but no Costner simply grunts and swears through most scenes in a gruff lazy drool, he's watchable as always but doesn't have much to work with here, though they do try to have him form a Bond with mother and child later on its quite late in proceedings.
There's some good touches, Gal Gadot brings out a softer side of Costner's character, there's a decent mix of Electro music and the film score used is atmospheric, some of the visuals are decent, shots of London for example and the action scenes whilst only short bursts are clear to see and not confusing and finally there's the thriller plot aspect of the story that plays like a standard spy/action thriller as our (anti) hero must set out to stop the villains and save the girl.
In closing, mixed performances, misplaced serious tone with violent outbursts of humour, some decent action but a bit of misguided film, watchable, not terrible but quite frustrating given the fact there's a better movie in there that could of got out.
3 out of 5.