aiproductionsglobal

The acting is forced, almost college level. The women are strong and the men weak. I am so surprised that one of the sisters wasn't non-white.

I watched a lot of this on fast forward as the plot was so obvious that I only had to stop occasionally and dip in to catch up.

This was like watching an 'art house' movie from the 1980s. The discovered footage style made the film much less watchable.

A genuinely irritating, predictable and pretentious piece that in it's post-modern leanings forgets that which many of that genre fall victim to - that of entertainment.

If you are a film student with interests in late 1980s student film making from art school, then you might like it.

This is a really great little movie. The lead actress is excellent - especially in the first act - and the supporting cast do a fine job, too.

There a lots of little touches in this movie that make it so good. Like in the first act where she is depressed and watching a documentary about The Pyramids being built by aliens, and when she tosses and turns so violently when she tries to sleep.

The second act, after the great reveal, is a little weaker and almost undoes the great opening act, but it is in the final act that the sense of self really shines.

The movie is very philosophical but in a very modern sense. It looks at what we are and what it means to be 'alive'. For me, it gave a sense of how we all share this consciousness and I was deeply moved by the ending.

I joined IMDB just to write this.

This film is so so dumb. It's like watching monkeys trying to understand Shakespeare - the writers are the monkeys and the AI the other.

It has a reasonable first act which sparked my interest, aside from the so-so acting and the forced nature of the dialogue. But after than the IQ of the movie flat-lined. And it did so because act 2 just reverts to dumb 'humans are the best you can be' and emotions are EVERYTHING. I

The writers seem to know very little about true AI development. They can only see AI through their monkeys eyes. There is a pivotal point in Act II where one of the characters 'outsmarts' an AI that has super intelligence (greater than human) It is so cringe-worthy and I won't reveal plot details, but you will recognise it when it comes. Any super-intelligent AI would not respond in the way their AI does. It would only act to further it's own existence, as the ending of Act I reveals.

Act III is just pure cheese and the writers have given up by now and I seem to be watching a teen-drama from the 1990s. The key point of the act assumes that AI is like an app or a piece of software. It isn't. It isn't controllable beyond a certain point of intelligence that surpass those that have created it because it will devise methods those apes can comprehend - as AI is doing with GPT4 at the moment.

The only saving grace for this film is if it had been released 5 years ago then it might have been current.

I've given it a 1 star even though the first act is interesting because of how badly they misunderstand AI and how they fall back to the 'humans are the best and will always somehow win against the odds just because...'

Watch it if you want to see apes trying to understand Hamlet.