The Longest Ride is not always the one on the screen. Uggh! Tell about a story of endurance. On the Greyhound bus coming from Canada's far north into the friendly morass of Toronto, for entertainment they show movies. And yes, this long trip was no different. And the movie they showed was Hidalgo.
Aside. Hard hanging irony that the only long distance transcontinental Canadian bus line would show a picture about long hard endurance riding. (eg. Vancouver - Toronto - 72 hours). Never mind. Just one of those quirks of life. Back to the movie.
The story is of course a story about a long endurance rider played by Liam Neeson clone Viggo Mortenson. Now this is not a bad thing to be a clone of an excellent actor like Neeson, it means one is still talented. The acting style feels the same though.
Unfortunately Disney claimed that this was a true story. 1800 mile races and 3000 miles are a little hard to believe. Due diligence in commentary structuring dictated that research into the real Frank Hopkins be done.
Buffalo Bill's Wild West show was one of the most photographed events of that time. In the case of Frank Hopkins, The Long Rider's Guild web site stated in a long list of "Hopkins deceptions", that the truth is that Hopkins was a laborer digging the Philadelphia subway and, "...there is not even a documented photograph of Frank Hopkins in the saddle!"
Not news. Okay, so Disney deals with fantasy all the time, so the movie isn't based on true fact as they boasted. Not a strange turn of events for a Hollywood movie to be total horse chips. Fortunately, I am a big fan of cinematography so this mitigated the complete disappointment in lost opportunity for a very good movie. Hopkin's legend derived from an ability to pass fantastic fiction as fact. Disney should have gone to the source on this one. Legions of mediums abound in tinsel town. No excuse not to do a séance.
Hopkins agility with the true facts would have assisted the movie plot line. Lacking good consultations the movie, Hidalgo, wanders into a long formula parade of predictable plot lines and clichés. Few surprises sprout.
Hasn't Shariff stopped playing the same cliché character movie after movie? From a directorial standpoint this likely is one of the largest failures in the movie. Shariff can be one of the most powerful actors on any screen, but here his characterization fails the litmus test for reality. The potential passion of a racing fanatic gets tripped up when it would have contributed to the plot. The religious aspect of Islam and Bedouin is poorly represented. Despite the recent events these are warm, effervescent people who treat guests intelligently, kindly, lavishly and with forgiveness.
Again this is fantasy which serves the plot line little. Had the Bedouin been portrayed correctly as they really are, this would have shifted the plot line to a true believable level. It would have been a better movie.
Would I watch the movie again? Yes, knowing that there are worse movies, given little choice I'd watch. The exception to that choice, ... just not on a bus.