Everything was great until the end. I can easily say that this second movie of A Quiet Place managed to be as scary as the first one with having more tempo.
Even though now we got used to the appearance of those monsters and know that they are killable, I still got terrified in every scene that has those monsters. I had thought that those monsters would feel like zombies from the movies that are just there to create some action sequences and die after that since we now know about them more. However, I was wrong. Those monsters were still terrifying, like in the first movie. I believe that camera angles and music have a lot of influence on that, so I think the director, John Krasinski, has done an excellent job. The movie had a strong opening, which I believe ended a bit abruptly and too soon. When we first saw that thing like a huge fireball was falling from the sky, I had goosebumps. I also loved Cillian Murphy's character, Emmett. But, I can't understand why he is okay to do anything when someone merely "pretty pleases" him after he clearly states that he will never do that or help them.
There are other things that tangled me as well. After Emily Blunt's character Evelyn leaves the shelter to grab some medicine, I couldn't reason why the hell the kid Marcus left that shelter. I think a coward character like him leaving the shelter does not make any sense. I think the only reason he left there was to get into trouble and give us something to watch. In addition to that, when Marcus saw the skeletons behind the curtains, I expected to see something revealing an evil secret of Emmett. It just turned out to be something to scare him so that monsters can come.
I expected to see more from Djimon Hounsou's character since they showed him in the trailers and introduced him like he might play a considerable role in the future. I felt quite disappointed when I saw him die after 15 minutes after his introduction to the film because as I said, I pictured him in my head to be more important. Last but not least, the thing that tangled me the most is how the hell did that monster manage to come to the island with that boat by itself. The explanation might be something like the water flow, but I still think that this thing has to be clarified. Those were just the little things that confused me a bit. It did not really affect my watching pleasure, but the next thing that I'm going to talk about did.
I feel something incomplete about the ending. The movie just ended while it deserved a proper final that resolved most of the things. I am aware that they did this to give something to part III, but I think it is enough. Because they just ended abruptly, it does not feel like a complete film and leaves a weird taste in your mouth. It would still be okay if they presented a paragraph about what happened afterward because it would at least settle the story. Finally, they demonstrate that children killing those monsters is an important thing, even though we already knew that they can kill them. Even if they end the movie abruptly, it's better to show something that will change everything, similar to the first movie. It would be much better if someone else from far away that we do not know killed the monster because it would show that now everyone knows how to kill them with the help of the broadcast.
That was all I can say about the movie. Even the end troubled me; I still had a lot of fun watching it. On the other hand, I still believe that ending in a movie is so important.