Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat.
Presumption of innocence.
Just a simple question, where is the other side?
Is this a judgement before judgement?
Have I read that "someone" bought an indulgence for 12 mil. Pounds?
And I must ask, how "filthy rich" Ghislaine needed Jeffrey's money, as it was stated in the movie?
After Jeffrey's, more than suspicious suicide, our attention should be turned to Ghislane. We must forget as soon as possible all those, Clinton like, names, and listen to those three years meticulously staged stories, like "yes we knew them for decades and we knew something was so wrong"?
Sorry.