mn2000

Thor movies used to be cool (except for The Dark World, which was not that bad) but even The Dark World was even better than this. In fact, I regret watching Love and Thunder.

Why I chose to watch this movie on a Friday? Friday was supposed to be fun!! I just wish I can travel in time to never watch this movie.

Thor has been one of my favorite super heroes but I will never watch a new Thor movie again.

There are so many things to say, that I just don't gonna say anything . Too much and I only have 557 characters remaining to write, and I need more. So, I will summarize with one thing: I am afraid that Disney will ruin the MCU.

If you are expecting to see a Christopher Nolan's style batman story, portrayed by Christian Bale or Ben Affleck, you will be disappointed.

It will be controversial and will have mixed criticism, because many people probably got use to a different style of Batman, but it is very attractive for those who love art. And it is still Batman in all aspects.

This is a more sentimental, romantic, and heroic Batman. Not just a superhero, but a hero. Still maintaining the mysterious concept that characterizes the batman movies, and following the batman's timeline, with a little younger (and a little less experienced) version of Batman targeting Gotham's high-end criminals, with a very sexy ally.

Not just another Batman's movie, but one that can have you talking for while.

I still believe the Dark Knight is the best Batman's movie of all time, but is there's runner up, it should be this movie.

I want to say thanks Marvel, thank you so much! This movie is definitively a gift for all Marvel fans.

This went way beyond our imagination.

I cried a couple of times watching this, and it is amazing how they connected everything without missing anything. And I enjoyed every single second.

This is now my favorite superhero movie and it is somehow even better than Avengers: Endgame.

I will not tell you what you will read in other reviews, whether if they are good or bad, but I will give you some answers, and the reason why this movie deserves 9 stars, why not more, and why not less.

Ok, Neo and Trinity are old and tired now, but did you watch the entire movie till the end? They both became even more powerful than ever, at the end of the movie. And remember, this is set 60 years after the dead of Trinity and the ceasefire/peace treaty. This movie is the future of Matrix.

Now, I don't know what the producers are planning to do, currently, no official plans for a Matrix Resurrections sequel have been announced. Warner CEO Ann Sarnoff hinted that Warner Bros. Would be open to a Matrix 5, if director Lana Wachowski wanted to make it. So, there are big chances this is a new trilogy. But think about it, if there will be a new trilogy, this is how this should have started, because imagine a Matrix movie without Neo and Trinity, I probably wouldn't even watch it, honestly. They are the most loved characters, other than Morpheus.

And talking about Morpheus... a lot of people complained that Laurence Fishburne was not in this movie, and some even hate the new Morpheus. But take in mind, again, that this is set 60-year after the ceasefire/peace treaty. The real/original/human Morpheus is dead! So, this is a new reconstructed Morpheus by Neo, inside The Matrix. And this takes us back to the first comment, "Oh Neo and Trinity look old and tired"; However, the same people who complain about this, also complain about the new young and strong Morpheus. There's no way to have them happy, because they are just haters!

I would be happy if Morpheus was still alive, like a Zion or IO governor or senator or something like that, but it wouldn't make sense make a sequel in that timeline because remember, Zion and the machines had a peace treaty. So, that peace treaty should last at least 60 years. That makes sense!

It all makes sense!

Now, let me give you my honest opinion about this movie. "The Matrix Resurrections" is nearly as great as the first Matrix movie, and better than "The Matrix Reloaded" and "The Matrix Revolutions" don't listen to the haters! The first movie is still my favorite, and this happens very often in many sequels because usually the first one is the one with the big story, all others are just the follow-up to a great story because the first one was so successful. But "The Matrix Resurrections" is still a great movie because of many reasons, and I don't think I have time to explain all of them, but if you want to understand why it is a great movie, please don't make the mistake that most people do, please, please, take a marathon, and watch the first three movies again (no matter how many times you watched them a long time ago), but watch them first before watching this one.

I give 9 stars. And I will explain why 9, why not 10, and why not less than 9.

Now, the story could have been better? I believe yes. The production could have been better? I also believe yes. For example, Neo shouldn't look like John Wick, honestly. This new appearance made me think a lot about John Wick, while watching the movie and that was very distracting, honestly. I understand he is the same actor, but why should he look exactly like John Wick?

Another thing is, if there were going to reconstruct Trinity, and thank you so much for that, I love Trinity, and I was so sad in the last movie, but at least give me better reasons to believe they were able to reconstruct her and bring her back to life. I mean, she was totally dead! Did you see how she died in that last movie? How is it even possible? But I understand, technology improved, and probably her brain was still alive, so they were able to reconstruct her. But I feel like there's still something missing in this story. I mean, how is this even possible? Maybe, we needed some more science in this part of the story, so we are not like "really?". But again, I am super happy that she is back. Thank you so much for that.

Everything is possible in Hollywood. Now I can believe that Tony Stark can be resurrected.

You made me think that everything possible in Hollywood, even resurrecting Tony Stark (which has nothing to do with Matrix, but I have to say it). But again, thank you for resurrecting Trinity, even if I feel like a child when his parents are lying to him, but what a happy lie. At least I am so happy with this lie.

Now, do we need to talk about everything else? (The acting performance, cinematography, editing, sound mix, etc. Etc. Etc.) I don't think so because I think they were all great, and that's why I give it 9 stars. Except for the new agent Smith, but I will no go in details with this, you all should know what I'm talking about.

Special effects and cinematography were even better than what I was expecting because it seems like hollywood movie producers have been trying to save some money lately due to the pandemic, and that's sad but Warner Bros. Gave me more than what I expected and thank you very much for that.

The last 30 minutes of the movie were beyond thrilling. I opened my eyes wider and was so thrilled that I was like "Wow! You made it! Now we have a great movie in 2021!

It's a great movie, period.

If you are a Matrix fan, you will love it. I don't think a Matrix fan will actually hate this movie. But there are always some haters everywhere. Don't listen to them because they hate everything in life, everything.

Please don't pay attention to unsubstantiated reviews. It's a great movie.

All is perfect in this movie, except for the end. Why James Bond has to die? Why? I hate the end.

My only hope is the text at the end of the credits. But I hope it's true.

I am in shock.

No no no no no no no.

Why?

Can someone explain why James Bond died? This is most horrible end I have ever seen.

Well, everything was perfect until that end.

When I watch this movie, it only makes me remember how good were all those other Star Wars movies and series before this one. They were great! But this one is a disaster.

I am a Star Wars fans that has watched everything about Star Wars, including all animated series, movies, TV shows, video games, toys, non-canon legends, articles, everything. I can tell Star Wars is my favorite franchise to marathon.

Last year I started my full marathon again, for 4th time, including all movies and series. The marathon is really long but hugely enjoyable at a level that no other can compete, until you get to this movie, The Last Jedi (2017).

The Last Jedi (2017) screwed it all.

Let me explain...

...If you are not a Star Wars fan, and you watch this movie alone (without marathon), you may like it. But when you are a Star Wars fan, you will feel severely disappointed, specially if you are marathoning.

Where's the respect for the Star Wars fans?

I blame it on only two persons: Rian Johnson (writer and director) and. Kathleen Kennedy (producer). You two screwed up what George Lucas took 40 years to build.

It was much better with George Lucas. Oh! Way better!

Why I blame it on Kathleen Kennedy? Because she is in charge now. If you choose someone to direct a Star Wars movie, make sure he or she is a Star Wars fan, because oh God! The Star Wars fanbase takes all this very seriously.

I have some questions for you, Rian, and Kathleen. See below:

* How Luke Skywalker gave up and abandoned his only family (his sister and friends) the republic, and all the causes for what he fought so hard and refused to help them? Did you even watched the original trilogy? Luke never give up. Please watch The Return of the Jedi, Rian.

This "Last Jedi" Luke is not in line with the Luke from previous movies. And that's just NOT what a Jedi does.

* If Luke didn't want to be found, how R2 D2 gave the missing part of the map? Can you explain?

* How Rey, without any experience with the force, develops skills so perfectly and quickly in a way that an experienced Jedi or even a Sith has never done it?

* What is that training from Luke?? Are you kidding me?? And how this training helped her in some way??

* Where the hell the all-powerful Snoke came from?? He did showed up in Star Wars without any origin, background/story? Nothing?

* How Leia survived that incredible SCAR explosion like in way that no a Jedi wouldn't have survived? Ok she is a Skywalker but, if she is so powerful, more than the Jedis (judging for the way she survived) why she didn't used those powers before to help a little bit? C'mon!!! This doesn't makes sense!!

* Why Finn and Rose rescue the space-horses but don't rescue the children?

* And there's a lot more. I just don't have time to mention more than 30 errors found on this movie.

If you are a Star Wars fan, you know what are all those errors.

We, the Star Wars fans deserve more respect.

I am going to marathon again, and I will skip this one and pretend this movie doesn't exists.

The production design is good, the special effects are good, the acting is good, but the story is a joke. This screenplay is embarrassment for the Star Wars fans.

Wow! wow wow wow! what a legendary performance by Joaquin Phoenix in this movie.

I would recommend, first go to watch Batman movies (or maybe just one, "The Dark Knight", so you understand who is the Joker, then comeback and watch this movie (Joker), and then make a review. Don't just review without understanding who exactly is the Joker.

Then you will understand why this movie really deserves the Oscar at least in the category of Best Performance in Leading Role.

It is incredible to see how amazing is the character development in this film.

Other than the acting, everything else was also great, including the costume design, hairstyling (that one in the Joker), the make-up (that one in the Joker), the cinematography, art direction, and everything else, just amazing.

This movie only remembers me other legendary movies that made a huge impact, and it is now in the IMDB Top 20 ranked movies of all time, a prestigious list that has other legendary titles such as The Dark Knight (2008), Forrest Gump (1994), The Godfather 1 & 2, The Lord of the Rings trilogy, and others. And it is for a reason.

I would be surprised if this movie doesn't gets nominated in the Academy Awards in categories like Best Actor Performance in a Leading Role, and Best Picture. Joaquin Phoenix deserves the Oscar this year.

From the screenplay, the costume design, hairstyling, the art direction, to the cinematography, the music, the direction, and the acting, this TV series was crafted, developed and finished to perfection. There's just a few historical TV series out there that you can compare with this one, in the level of quality and professionalism.

Every single role (job position) in this entire production deserves a special and notorious mention. Wow! what a great job!

I had to watch this series a couple of times to admire every single detail in it. Too much good stuff! Amazing in every single piece. An iconic an exemplary production that makes you travel in time by just watching it.

The acting from Jonathan Rhys Meyers (King Henry VIII), Maria Doyle Kennedy (Queen Catherine of Aragon), Natalie Dormer (Anne Boleyn), Sarah Bolger (Mary Tudor), Henry Cavill (Charles Brandon), Anthony Brophy (Ambassador Bishop Chapuys), James Frain (Thomas Cromwell), Sam Neill (Cardinal Thomas Wolsey), Gabrielle Anwar (Princess Margaret)... (not enough space to mention all of them and their great labor), it was impeccable! Even those who did not have much participation were excellent. And an honorable mention to Peter O'Toole (Pope Paul III), despite that only participated in seven episodes, but masterful performance, as well as everybody else.

If I have to make at least four special mentions, other than the acting, it would be to the cinematography, art direction, costume design, and hairstyling. But this does not detract from all the hard work seen in all the other roles which were as well as amazing as these ones, such as the music, the incredibly great direction, and the entire production (everyone). .

I'm only disappointed by the fact that the Golden Globes did not give them more recognition, but I'm glad to know that the The Tudors won 49 awards (from 82 nominations), including the very desired Primetime Emmy Awards.

The story of the Tudors dynasty, and King Henry VIII was perfectly captured in this series. If you haven't see it, I invite you to watch it.

Will Smith has an amazing gift to play many different roles. And his role in this documentary series was crucial to make it a piece of art, with the potential to change up to even your mindset.

But this is not just another documentary about our planet, no, this goes beyond everything we've seen about Earth.

All the information gathered in the making of this documentary series is so valued that only way to tell is by watching it.

Put simple, you have to finish watching the movie, up to the end, the very end, then you can judge.

The level of acting, just makes you feel in some way that you are watching your own life. One of those movies that makes you some how feel inside the movie and forget about everything surrounding you. That's my opinion about the acting in this movie, Laia Costa, Nicholas Hoult, Danny Huston, and even Pom Klementieff. Great acting! specially Laia (Gabi) at the movie ending.

The screenplay in overall is in big part about something that happens truly often in real life, but, the story in depth, is a master piece, Despite that the beginning looks like an ordinary teenager/youth romantic movie, because it starts from two young guys that have hooked up with many people, and then meet each other, and start to get bored, going to alternatives to keep the relationship alive by pushing the boundaries. At that point, you think well, this is probably another kinky movie, BUT at some point in the middle of the story, the drama starts to develop to a level of unpredictability that makes you think "Ok, wow now where is this going?..." although you can predict the end when the movie gets close to it, but it's ok! the end has to start to develop at some point in a romantic drama movie.

The best part of the movie, and the story, is when the love and the human feelings survive above anything else that is similar to love or fun (which is nothing new, BUT the whole story all-together makes it a very creative screenplay). The end can drop tears and makes you immediately tell your spouse "I love you!", and it could be a life-changing end. Or it can just make you saw "Awww! that's so cute!".

Now, if you are type of "perfect" and "holy" person that never has done anything wrong or naughty in your life, you may say things like "Ah this is about selfish love" "this is a kinky trash" and things like that. But c'mon! pay attention to the movie, be sincere with yourself for at least once instance in your entire life, and wait until the end! if you do so, I promise you, you will at least respect this screenplay, and the great acting.

In overall, I think this movie is one of the best underrated romantic drama films of the latest five years. And please notice, I said: Underrated. If you don't know what i mean, put simple, I think this movie deserved more appreciation. But it won't have more appreciation, because in 2017-2019 we are still in a world that is full of holy perfect humans that don't put aside the hypocrecy and pay attention to a great sample of art, which I think, the production team on Newness (2017), they made something that deserves admiraction.

In the first place, why they filmed this? why? I know this is Sci-Fi, but at least try! The competency in Sci-Fi movies and TV-series today is hard. You cannot just come with this type of garbage anymore! No! Those times ended! I mean, what's this??? What's this??? This is one of the worst garbage I have ever seen in my life! They use a lot of scientific terms without scientific basis; they talk about orbiting a giant blue star with human tribulation and traveling faster than the speed of light, passing the dark matter to meet another civilization for the first time. This is definitively written by someone that didn't make his/her homework on astronomy/cosmology. Jesus! Jesus! what a garbage! For your reference, just for comparison, a star like our Sun only has a surface temperature of about 6,000 Kelvin. A blue giant star can put out 10,000 times as much energy as the Sun. ... These can be a blue star with surface temperatures of 20,000 - 50,000 Kelvin and can be 25 times larger than the Sun. Is the human kind sending people to a blue giant star in the future? and get carbonized by the radiation? I know, this TV-series is Sci-Fi, but for the love of god!!! at least try!! But the worst part is not the story. Well, yes, yes, the story is the worst, but even worst than that is the acting and directing. Horrible. Why do you guys make a rich guy spend a lot of money investing in this kind of garbage to make all of us waste our precious time? why? why? why? somebody tell me why! Whoever wrote this, that person hate us. You don't believe me? watch this TV-series for 45 minutes, and I guarantee you will understand. And here is my question to IMDB... yes IMDB... Why you don't let us rate movies with a Zero? why? now I need the zero after watching this!!

The major problem with this film is the acting. Really bad acting. Actors don't look convincing, but probably the worst is Sophie Skelton overacting from the very beginning. You know, when you watch a movie, you want to forget about the real world and get into the movie, but once I saw Sophie's acting, I realized I was just watching a bad movie. Horrible. But don't blame it all on her; all of them are terrible. But then, there's Nicolas Cage there too, a memorable actor with a legendary trajectory that started to decline when he started to participate in this kind of movies. But he still has my respect, for the movies like Leaving Las Vegas (1995), Adaptation. (2002), and Face/Off (1997). But this doesn't distracts me from the fact that he is also remembered for really bad movies like Left Behind, Outcast and Pay the Ghost. Jesus! Horrible! Horrible movies! Now this legendary Nicolas Cage seems to have up and downs, more than any other movie star in the world history. This movie, 211 (2018), has a big chance to stay in the list of his worst movies forever. The music direction is ok; the art direction is kinda ok. But again, the acting screw ups everything. And the screenplay, well, just makes me feel like another copy of copy of copy, nothing original, not even a line. If you want to be part of the history, and watch one of the Nicolas Cage's worst movies, and waste your precious time, watch this movie. You will be close to hate Nicolas Cage after this. Again, we almost forgive him because he also made good movies.

This movie is extremely predictable. Since the moment the astronaut casually gave the key to the four survivor kids, you know what's the end.

I wish I can travel in time to not to watch this movie.

The key which was in the space for some reason, has to be used on earth to save the world! so the key part of the movie is the key, from the very beginning.

Well, there are many scenes along the movie that don't make any sense. I will just mention a few. This movie doesn't even deserves another hour of my time just reviewing.

The kids finds a man behind bars in the police station; they released him. A while later he just showed up, and surprise! He is a gang-band leader who was able to find the other gang members and then find the kids, hey more surprises! now he was asking for the key!! Yes the key!! I mean, the key!! K - E - Y He was asking the kids for the key!! Wow this is amazing!! That's a lot of creativity there!! but... really? How?? How did he even know about the key? Wait! Maybe he was arrested because he was looking for the key!!! Yes!! I got it!! But hey!! How?? How did he even knew that the kids found the key that fell from space in a capsule. Well going back, I have to mention that accidentally after they kids receive the key, they met the gang leader when he was behind bars!!! But the key point here is, how the gang leader knew about this key? well, the movie doesn't reveals how everybody knew about this key. But how a street gang leader knew about about it and he also knew that the kids had the key!! Bufff I give up!

My key point here is the key. The mysterious key.

Well I was going to give 2 points to this movie, but then one of the most nervous kids became a hero when trying to get the key which was left in the car that fell with the creature, and when he picked up the key, the creature scratched him (curiously in the chest, but the creature was behind him, take notes) and the kid apparently starts losing blood, a while later he faints in the NASA building in Pasadena, California, yes it makes sense.. but surprise! another while later he was able to get up! he was able to run and and celebrate the victory at the end of the movie!! but what happened to the wound and the blood? I mean, he faint because he lost blood! There was not ambulance!! No no no wait! I got it! This got to be a prank from the writer...

I give up. If the idea of this movie was to help fill up the movies catalog, they achieved it. Yes. But I better stop here, I'm not going to say that.

Well, If I keep mentioning all other non-sense scenes, this review will go for long, but I don't want to waste another hour of my life on this.

In conclusion, with 5.1 score based on 3,352 user ratings, I found out that this movie is overrated. I have seen better movies with score under 5.

Don't waste your valued time watching this. I regret it. I suggest to come to IMDB first, and see the score, and then watch the movie. If it's under 5.2, be ready to waste your time.

SPOILER ALERT! IF YOU HAVEN"T WATCH IT, DO YOURSELF A FAVOR, DON'T READ REVIEWS YET, GO WATCH IT FIRST. OTHERWISE, YOU WILL GET SPOILED. Everything has an explanation.

If you didn't do a marathon watching the 21 marvel movies before Endgame (or at least 12 of the essential movies), you will probably end adding a negative review about Endgame.

1st: Why Captain America was able to use Thor's hammer? (And some say: "the cap used even better than Thor, how?"). OK, here is why.

You have to go back to Thor's and Captain America's movies. Back in Thor (2011), Thor committed an act of war that put the lives of millions of people on risk, so he demonstrated not to be worthy, so Odin exiled Thor, removing his rights to use the hammer. Odin said "Whosoever holds this hammer, if he be worthy, shall possess the power of Thor". In the same movie, Thor tried to pick up the hammer, and he wasn't able to do it because he was not worthy. The keyword here is "Worthy". At the end of the movie, when Thor sacrificed his life to save the world, then he demonstrated to be worthy, and then the hammer came back to him. Then, going back to Captain America's movies, from the very beginning, when Steve Rogers was not a superhero yet, in several occasions, he demonstrated to be worthy, including that moment on which he jumped over a pomegranate to save the lives of people that were just bullying him. In fact, he was chosen to become a super soldier, because of was worthy to become super powerful (did you watch Captain America the First Avenger?) if not, you won't understand anything about the cap. The movies after that, he also continues to give his life for others, putting himself on risk to save the world (even before having any power).

Remember that fun scene in Age of Ultron on Thor is making fun of everybody because nobody can pick up the hammer? But when Captain America tried, Thor gets surprised because when Captain America make his try, the hammer moves, but then cap is so humble that look at Thor and then doesn't pick it up, maybe he was not fully worthy at that moment yet?. If you look back in the comics, the cap picked up the hammer a couple of times.

2nd: Why Captain America took the hammer with him at the end of the movie when going back in time to return the infinity stones? This is not revealed in Endgame, but he was definitively returning everything back, maybe the Hammer was one of those things, so it won't mess Thor's timelines. Thor needed that hammer in the past, that's a reason.

3rd: Why Captain America was able to use the StormBreaker? The StormBreaker doesn't has the magic from Odin. So anybody with enough strength can use it. Is not the hammer that has the magic from Odin.

4th: Why Captain America appears as an old man, at the end of the movie? C'mon guys! You don't know this? Really? Again, watch Captain America: The First Avenger (2011), and also watch Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014), and you will find all answers. He had a pending dance with the love of his life, the woman with who he wanted to get old together. Remember in the Winter Soldier, he said to her (on her deathbed) "we still have a pending dance". That's why the movie ends with that dance! And c'mon! He deserves a life too! That's why he just appears as an old man in front of the lake, because he used the time travel to have a life and get old with his woman! Jesus! C'mon! Please tell me that you get it.

5th: Why Captain Marvel doesn't really stick around to show off all her infinite power to just defeat Thanos? The simple answer is, because you guys hate her!!! If Marvel gives the main role to Captain Marvel, most of the Marvel fans will get pissed! C'mon tell if I am right or wrong?

About the Timeline Mess-up: Yes, I understand, time travel in so many stories, it brings new time lines, and this leaves some unanswered questions. Now let's look at the future. Did you see the new Spider-man trailer? Nick Fury calls Spider-man to resolve a mess with the new timelines. In fact, he ask "why you didn't call Captain Marvel", they answer "She is not available". The real answer is "She is not that popular, the fan base hate her, that's why we called you, Spider-man". Also after Tony Stark death, which movie you think is more profitable? Either a Spider-man movie or Pepper's movie, right? But people won't really like Pepper as they already like Spider-man. So who is the go-to person now? Spider-man. And the probe of this is that he sets a new record in trailer views. Everybody wants to know what's next! That's why Spider-man is the man now. He was Iron man's pupil, and he still wears the suit made by Iron Man. So Spider-man is at the same time new Iron-man? And he is going to resolve some of the mess-up caused by the time travel? Well let me tell you, this is much better than having almost all superheroes dead.

Do you guys really thing the planning for a movie with a budget of $356,000,000 (estimated), is just about a few guys just sitting and inventing random stories without analyzing? Nope. That's a lot of people thinking and challenging each other when a new idea comes out. Almost everything in this movie makes sense and is referenced from prior movies. And anything that doesn't makes sense yet, will makes sense in the future, in the next movies.

My only concern in this movie is who dies. I still don't accept it. I can accept black widow death because she has a contract for a prequel, so we are going to watch much more about her. But Ironman! C'mon! Why him? You lost black widow, and we are losing the cap, and Ironman too? Marvel you sacrifice too much. We can still enjoy the movie without so many sacrifices. That's my only concern. Yes, I am still sad about who died. But I have to accept it. Let me tell you, if all the good guys always survive, and all the bad guys always die, in every single movie you watch, then what's the point? You will know the end already! But Marvel is giving us stories that keeps us thrilled because we cannot predict it (unless you have been spoiled of course). These are movies in where anything can happens, as they says "whatever it takes". But hey, I am still sad. Sad! Very Sad! Why him? This is the only reason why I would hate Marvel.

Well, in overall, Avengers: Endgame, is the end of an era, and it is the most epic ending you couldn't even imagine.

It took them more than a decade to make this movie. All of those 21 prior movies point to this one, and this on point back to the prior movies too. You may be surprised of finding also some references from the comics.

Some of my favorite parts are the references to all the 21's prior movies to this one. But this is also a double-edged sword, because it is good for people that really remember those movies, but bad for those that are not fans, didn't watch the prior movies, and don't know what is going on.

Another good mention about Endgame and all Marvel movies is that they are bordering the lines between science and science fiction. Marvel Studios prides itself on scientific continuity throughout its many movies, and this movie really made it in that direction. They give a drama story and origin to each super hero, and they also explain their powers and how these characters obtained these powers. Most of the story is actually based on scientific theories (the quantum physics), and how far a civilization can go if some of these theories are exploded. So can we become super heroes and travel back in time? Hey, I haven't say that. But if you are a science enthusiast, you will love how Marvel does it with science fiction.

Marvel make us become children again by the time we sit to watch their movies.

Everything in this movie is above and beyond amazing, in combination with the full sequel (as I mentioned above). The story and screenplay, the art direction, the acting, sound mixing, visual effects, engineering effects, music, cinematography, costume design (as always), action, drama, comedy, film editing, everything. No negative critics. Would it earn or be nominated to an Oscar? Well, I think Avengers in overall has the potential to add another category to the Oscars: 'Best Sequel'. Yeah! Why not? As I said, if you judge this movie itself without watching the entire 22 avenger's movies, it won't be a fair judgement! Period. Oscar's committee, please take that in mind.

Would I watch it again! Yes, I'm going back to the movie theater, to watch it a couple of times more. And then when it gets released in Blu-Ray, I will watch it again about 4 times more. For real, it is fun to watch!