84
Métascore
30Commentaires · Fourni par Metacritic.com
- 100The New York TimesVincent CanbyThe New York TimesVincent CanbyThe reason the film prompts laughter, and finally elation, is not because it's jolly or has any feel-good words to live by. It's because of the utterly demonic skill with which these foulmouthed characters carve one another up in futile attempts to stave off disaster.
- 100Rolling StonePeter TraversRolling StonePeter TraversThe pleasure of this unique film comes in watching superb actors dine on Mamet's pungent language like the feast it is.
- 100Dallas ObserverLuke Y. ThompsonDallas ObserverLuke Y. ThompsonThe directing's a bit obtrusive, but the script and the acting gets to the heart of Mamet's glorious obsession with macho B.S.
- 100Entertainment WeeklyOwen GleibermanEntertainment WeeklyOwen GleibermanThe movie version, directed with unobtrusive precision by James Foley, stays amazingly true to the play's feisty spirit.
- 90The A.V. ClubNoel MurrayThe A.V. ClubNoel MurrayGets most of its legs from the acting and the dialogue, which has such a rhythmic grace that scenes from the movie can be played and replayed with no loss of thump.
- A searing showcase for a remarkable ensemble cast.
- 75The Globe and Mail (Toronto)The Globe and Mail (Toronto)It's blackly comic - though the humour creeps up on you slowly, and you're seldom sure if you should really be laughing.
- 70VarietyTodd McCarthyVarietyTodd McCarthyBut it doesn't quite all come together here as it did onstage, and relentless scabrousness, heavy claustrophobia and a vaguely dated feel are among the elements that will keep mainstream audiences away.
- 60The New YorkerMichael SragowThe New YorkerMichael SragowHammers away at the plot so relentlessly that you can feel the nails entering the back of your skull.
- 60Washington PostDesson ThomsonWashington PostDesson ThomsonThere is no evidence of life outside the immediate world of the movie.