When you can actually make GRETCHEN sound sexy then you know you've got something.

My no 1, sort of. Tough to pick just one.

THE sex-bomb of the 70s, but fairly rapidly lost her looks.

Unlike most of the women on this list, she played in a number of good movies. (Talking about the 70s and 80s, not this past decade.)

If I included the quality of the movies as well, she'd be unassailably the no 1 here.

Helen's physical transformation has been interesting. Slightly chubby, very voluptuous in the late 60s, then thinner and with curlier hair in the 70s and 80s, then with short hair in the early 90s (her weakest period), then the sexiest 60something in the history of film. I've been a fan of her beauty since I was a kid, and am glad she's become something of a sex icon in recent years.

Utterly sweet, and a perfect blend of cute and beautiful.

I.e. cutiful.

Cameron Diaz would give a leg to look half as good as she does.

Still looks good. Some genes age well.

Well, what do you know. The other day (around 2010) I met Danijela, bumped into her through sheer chance. She'd always been my no 1 Serb-actress choice, so if I were a religious person I'd probably get all sorts of crazy ideas regarding this rather amazing coincidence.

She still looks fantastic, in her 40s. Of course, if there were an actual photo here, you wouldn't have to google her to see why she's on the list. Someone should put a photo here finally, this empty space is quite ridiculous.

A bit too thin, her only issue.

One of the most photogenic women on the planet. She looks fantastic on every single pic, which is bizarre.

Another "bizarrity" is that she always looks a little older than she is, in her 30s and 40s. Yet even at 52 she beats 20 year-old Aniston by a huge margin.

But that's not much of a feat, of course.

It's very unfortunate that she plays in mostly crap movies. And usually doesn't get the lead role. Because she never said yes to Weinstein?

No, she cannot have a career like Mila Kunis, because Amanda is simply too good-looking - and doesn't have the "right Hollywood breeding" (if you know what I mean).

Very good actress too.

I'm ashamed to admit that I included her on the list only very recently, almost a decade after the list's inception. I'd always known about Elvira but had no clue how stunning she looked back in the 70s. Her vampiric look isn't that great.

A classic beauty, the type ALL guys can agree on. But she is far more attractive than Grace Kelly or Katherine Deneuve, who both fall into the same category. The Barbie Doll category.

I prefer her at 30plus than at 20.

She has a twin sister. Or not. Not sure.

Total innocence is her defining feature.

Cute, likable, sexy.

Hence her career in films was doomed.

If she'd been ugly, unlikable and unsexy she might have had a shot at stardom.

Looks much better as a brunette.

One of the rare millennial actresses that deserve to be on the list.

Walkabout.

That's all I gotta say.

Has everything going for her - talent, looks, body, charisma - except nepotism to catapult her into bigger movies.

Still, she is ethnically PC.

On the other hand, Hollywood won't be too eager to push any actress with ample... assets.

Forget Eva Mendez, Eva Longoria, and Salma Hayek. Liz is the hands-down most gorgoeus Latina Hollywood ever dumped on us.

Well, not dumped. She was generously offered, whereas the two Evas and Salma were unceremoniously dumped on us.

Such innocence about her...

She was a liberal.

I.e. appearances can be so deceptive.

Prettiest Croat actress. Looked great as a young woman, even better in middle age.

If she'd been born the daughter of a Hollywood producer (or had the "right breeding"), she would have been the world's greatest film star by now.

But, as it is, she's almost totally unknown. One of Emir Kusturica's very few good deeds, hiring her for one of his stupid movies.

There's no photo here (typical), so you'll have to google her. Or just click here:

http://vjetropev.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-most-beautiful-serbian-women.html

Italian cinema is the complete opposite of British cinema.

In Italian cinema film-makers try to cast the best-looking actress they can find. In British cinema they do the opposite.

And then they wonder about being tagged as eccentrics.

Bollywood star, probably the prettiest they ever had.

Of course, I am guessing here. I have no clue what the others look like, nobody aside from Indians actually follows Bollywood. Considering that Bollywood is awash in nepotism, my guess is I may very well be right with my assessment.

She killed herself at a young age.

The Katherine Hepburn of Yugoslavian cinema.

Except that Milena is beautiful, charismatic and feminine.

Typical British hottie. Reminds me a lot of an English girl I went to school with.

Stems from an ultra-wealthy family, but all is forgiven when you look like this.

I meant that in the sense of Hollywood's elitism and nepotism, not in the sense of "rich people are all wicked". Only Hollywood's rich elites are all wicked, the others are a mixed bag.

She always plays in relatively obscure films...

... Because she's too pretty for Aniston-bowing Hollywood? Because she refused to meet Weinstein in a dark casting room?

She was stunning back in the 80s. Looked pretty good afterwards too.

Much much better than Aniston, in every way, shape or form.

Extremely cute, and I'm baffled why there's no pic of her.

EDIT: Ah, finally.

Peter Jackson really screwed up by casting Liv Tyler, but he mostly made it up with this choice.

Mostly. Because casting Liv Tyler is tough to balance out. Even with Miranda Otter.

That middle name though...

A clueless left-winger back in the day, but what a beauty. Kind of like Vivien Leigh but prettier.

Yup, Boiz like Cecile...

Almost as much as I like my dumb word-play.

Why implants?

There is a scientific theory that correlates beauty and intelligence in a direct relation.

The theory could be wrong.

Forget Halle Berry and her surgically altered face. This one should garner all that attention.

Which brings me to why she is the only black woman on the list. For whatever strange reason, Hollywood can't bring itself to push careers of beautiful black women: they always seem to go for women that are unexceptional.

Furthermore, Hollywood execs don't seem to mind black women having ample cleavage, whereas nearly all the white women they push are far more modest in that department. Just one of the many dubious goings-on in corrupt, decadent, vile Tinseltown.

Having said that, Pam Grier is close. Latifa and Whoopie are definitely not.

A few decades back she looked perfect. And then she made all the right "religious" and marriage moves, as we all know.

Very sweet, typical "All-American" type.

The sort of natural, next-door-neighbour beauty that's rare these days in films.

Come to think of it, ANY kind of beauties are rare these days in films. Thanks to nepotism, gay casting directors, and a large ethnic bias.

One of very few nepotists on this list.

Somewhat reminiscent of Cassandra "Elvira" Petersson from her early years.

I don't mean when Elvira was 5. Not that early.

Not the greatest intellectual in the world, but extremely sexy.

I was being diplomatic. Very diplomatic. UN-level diplomatic. Cosmic-Buddha-Ommm-level diplomacy.

My favourite cause? "March For April's Rights". That was righteous.

Another Establishment bot.

But we can forgive her... somewhat?

That's a pretty bad photo.

Not exactly your classic beauty, but I couldn't care less about Barbie-doll criteria anyway. She is kind of a Chloe Sevigny type - or Chloe is a Glenne Headly type, if you prefer.

Looks great as blonde and brunette alike.

Another one of those who should be every guy's type. She looks great from every angle and every pic.

Uber-cute. Not even a tiny ounce of testosterone anywhere.

Hear that, Cameron?

Photo... someone?

Get going.

And pick a good one.

No photo...?

It figures.

One of the very few nepotists on this list. Not a blood nepotist though, but nepotisized through marriage.

Nepotisized is a new word. Yes, I am an innovator, not just an educator.

Someone upload a photo, please.

And make sure it's not when she was a granny.

Unorthodox cuteness.

Some of you might say "unattractive", but then again some of you listen to rap and vote Democrat.

The name's real.

Too beautiful to have her career pushed to A-list stardom. She needs to look like Drew Barrymore (and have that sort of nepotistic family pull) in order to get anywhere.

Hmmm... A good-looking female star? That's quite weird. They tend to be homely these days.

Hollywood's Barbie doll turned flesh. Beautiful, but not as much as the gals in front of her.

Similar to Hope Davis.

And an intellect to match!

Or not.

They say she looks like a man next to Di Caprio in "Titanic". But that wasn't her fault. Leo would make ANY woman look like a man by comparison.

So next time James Cameron decides to make a lesbian couple the focus of a sinking-ship story, he might as well not beat around the bush with it and simply admit it (by giving them both girl names).

Obviously, this photo is no measure!

Come on, put another one. About 30 years older.

The French don't always try hard to find beauties for cinema, but very occasionally they find one anyway.

As different as the French and the English are, in one thing they are very similar: they are very eccentric in terms of what they consider female beauty. Both cinemas tend to pick below-par women very often and then pretend as if they are gorgeous.

This is the reason why you won't find many French actresses, considering what a big role French cinema plays internationally.

Italian names are very cute.

Nordic ones? Not so much.

Wanna bet she's the only Caitriona Balfe on IMDb's computers?

Or in them. I wasn't suggesting she was standing on a computer.

So why would anyone want to cast women like Julia Roberts with women like this around?

This is what female facial anatomy is all about, not Eva Mendez.

Eva is a bit too manly for my heterosexual taste.

Looked good even in her 50s. One of the best-looking of that era. Pity the movies back then sucked nearly as much as in the 00s and 10s.

If you ever wondered why Sandra Oh is pushed so hard by the Establishment, despite 100000s of far better-looking and more competent Oriental actresses...

...It's because she is so belligerently PC. Politically subservient to the needs of the control-freak Establishment. Nowadays that is a PREREQUISITE to corporate media success. Which is why 95% of current A/B-list actresses and pop singers virtue-signal at every opportunity.

Sexual servitude used to be the main way to reach the Hollywood top (even for certain male actors), now political obsequiousness is just as crucial, if not more so.

Unconventional-looking, very sexy French ginger.

Looks different on nearly every photo i.e. from every angle. One of those chameleons... In other words, "once you've seen her, you haven't seen her yet". One moment barely attractive, the other beautiful.

She looks good as a brunette, but I prefer her blonde version.

Half-Oriental, in case you were wondering.

Her sister Jennifer is cute too, sexier than Meg, but not cute enough for the list.

The Ditz is strong with this one.

I preferred her appearance before she started using 56 kilos of make-up and before she started making fake grimaces for nearly every photo. If she'd been a millennial, she'd have been one of those women that do plastic surgery every month, and she'd have posted terrible pouty selfies every day on Instagram. Horribly insecure and horribly thick. A precursor to the egotistical, superficial, looks-obsessed modern millennial woman.

Back in the 50s she was coerced into fixing her nose and the teeth. Just imagine what she'd be doing now - at, for example, age 50.

I read her biography. Basket case.

Italian women aren't known for their ravishing beauty, but they sure do know hot to pick them for films. Which is why there are so many of them on the list.

Why is there no photo here? Are we too busy ramming the next 300 pics into Cameron Diaz's page, so we can't find a minute's time to place one lousy pic for Belli?

EDIT: They uploaded a pic but it's a lousy film poster. Whoever made that poster is a buffoon. Why is the guy closer than she?

A bit like Heather Graham, roughly that type.

Exotic beauty. Black, Oriental, and what-not.

No nepotist connections, hence no chance at a major career.

Very charismatic, this one. Some good movies, too.

Yeah, about her choice of husband...

One of the rare nepotists.

Another rare nepotist.

The epitome of Anglo-Saxon cute.