It's sad to see The History Channel selling information based on the alleged perspectives of New Testament figures as "history." While there are accounts by historians written after the time of Jesus' life asserting that a man named Jesus was preaching to his fellow Jews about his unique connection to their God, and one mention is made of Jesus' brother being executed, that's all. That doesn't stop the history channel from presenting the New Testament accounts of Jesus' life, execution, and resurrection as if they are confirmed by historical evidence of some sort. The only evidence cited to support this is the New Testament itself and numerous theological scholars who obviously have a bias in assuming what's in the New Testament is historical fact. It's sad to see The History Channel, which could have interesting programming based on historical research, resort to this to get ratings.