Add a Review

  • "Anders als die Andern" (Different from the Others) is a 1919 German film starring Conrad Veidt that was pieced together and shown at one point on public television. About a law on the books that makes homosexuality a crime, it had a very short run in Germany before being pulled, and people who attended the movie were harassed.

    The lead is played by a German actor familiar to American audiences, usually for portraying a bad guy, Conrad Veidt. Despite dying in 1943, Veidt had a nearly 30-year career in films. Here he plays possibly the first gay character in cinema who, with such a law in place, is a target for a blackmailer.

    A very interesting film with a wonderful performance by Veidt. Only part of the movie remains, but it has been put together as well as can be expected - it is, after all, a mere 102 years old. It's amazing how relevant some of the material in it remains today.
  • Interesting early film dealing with homosexuality and the laws in Germany at the time making it a crime punishable by a prison sentence. About a famous violin virtuoso, Paul (played by Conrad Veidt), who after a concert one evening is approached by a handsome young man named Kurt who idolizes and has a youthful crush on the older man. Kurt dreams of taking lessons from his idol, so visits the kimono-dressed man in his apartments where he is soon being given private violin lessons. The two men quickly become closer and closer, playing duets together on violin and piano, and taking strolls in the park arm and arm, but unfortunately a blackmailer sees them in the park - and seizes upon an opportunity to make himself some quick "hush money". Interestingly, the blackmailer himself hangs out in a nightclub full of women dressed as men, and pairs of men dancing together, which made me wonder - is he out to find himself another victim for blackmail here or is he himself?

    This film is a reconstruction containing fragments, strung together in a well-done manner with intertitles and still photos describing and portraying the missing scenes. The print for the scenes that are intact look quite nice here, the music is appropriate and pleasing. Parts of the film almost come across as instructional, including a lecture given by a sexologist featuring a slide show of males and females mostly in various states of cross-dress. Conrad Veidt gives a very well-done, touching performance here, really giving off a keen sense of the strong relationship and love felt between Paul and Kurt. Well worth seeing.
  • It's a shame that about half of this film is lost, deliberately destroyed by the Nazis. What is odd is that probably the tamest portions of the film are missing - the parts with Paul Körner (Conrad Veidt) and his family, and the parts in which Paul interacts with Else, the girl who loves him. The parts that are missing though are masterfully replaced by still shots and enough inter-titles that you get a pretty good idea of how Paul gets along with his family.

    The film was made after World War I during a brief time of relative tolerance for homosexuality in Germany, and rather than try to be titillating, the film tries to teach of the problems with the German law that made it a crime to be homosexual. Paul Körner is a famous violin virtuoso who harbors a terrible secret - he's gay and constantly in fear of being discovered and prosecuted under the law. As a result, you realize that Paul is a rather sad and lonely man despite his professional success, unable to openly express himself and look for a life-partner out in the open. Things change when Paul takes on a pupil, Kurt Sivers, a young man who idolizes Paul. Paul seems to really fall for Kurt, but you can tell that Kurt is still somewhat unsure of what to make of his own feelings at this point. Unfortunately, Kurt's sister Else loves Paul too, not knowing that Paul is unable to return the sentiment.

    Paul is also being hounded by a blackmailer who first met him in a gay dance hall. When Paul mistook the blackmailer's advances as romantic, he took him back to his home and there the man spurned Paul and demanded money. You get the impression he's been hounding him ever since that time. What is odd is that the gay dance hall where he and Paul first met almost seems to be the blackmailer's second home, so I have to wonder why the blackmailer isn't afraid of being blackmailed himself.

    There's a well done set of scenes with Paul looking back on his life - his adolescence at boarding school specifically - and the trouble he had there on account of his orientation. There's even a scene with a sexologist lecturing on homosexuality - oddly enough, this is how Paul explains to Else the truth of who he is and that his rejection of her is not personal.

    Highly recommended as a good reconstruction of a lost silent film.
  • It's a wonder any of this film exists; if not for the wear of age (it's said that most films of this era are lost), one would think censorship and the Nazis would have annihilated it. Yet, much of the footage remains. The Kino release of the reconstruction fills in the rest of the story with explanatory intertitles and still photographs, nearing the film's original runtime. That's the first wonder.

    The second is its message of tolerance and understanding of homosexuals. Message films, social realist films, or "enlightenment films" were not too common in the silent era, probably because the lack of sound takes away from the capacity to lecture. Lois Weber is an exception that I'm familiar with; she made a career out of selling morals to audiences. "Different from the Others" includes the tact of a self-referential scene, which Weber broadened to more interesting depths in her best work. This is a film pleading for the equality of homosexuals, and it features a lecture within the lecture doing the same: the "sexoligist" Magnus Hirschfeld giving a slideshow presentation, which is attended by Else. I think it makes the film more honest, and, at the same time, it's a way for the filmmakers to be as blunt as possible.

    It's difficult to appreciate the film aesthetically, anymore. The gay nightclub scenes are frank, but the film seems to shy away from too much intimacy between homosexuals. "Philadelphia" (1993) has been criticized for it's lack of a kiss, too, so I suppose it's asking too much of a film from 1919. The camera-work appears rather static, as well. On the other hand, Conrad Veidt was an admirable man and quite an actor. This is as much bravery from a prominent actor as you'll ever see. And, he was outspoken against the Nazis, as opposed to Emil Jannings, probably the other major male star of German silent film. Although Veidt's performance is much in the style of the time, he shows the right balance of effeminacy without being stereotypical.

    Other than Veidt, the film isn't of much entertainment or artistic value. The film's message, however, is very important, even today; as the reconstruction introduction says, Germany, while a generally liberal government and populace today, Paragraph 175 wasn't repealed until 1994. And, there's the marriage debate in the US and elsewhere. "Different from the Others" is powerful in that way.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Anders als die Andern" or "Different from the Others" is a German black-and-white, silent film (soundtracks were added later) that runs for 50 minutes. It was probably a bit longer and parts may be lost from the original version written and directed by Richard Oswald. This film will soon have its 100th birthday, it is from 1919, and this makes the message in the movie extremely interesting. Homosexuality was considered abnormal back then, people were sent to doctors to be cured from this disease. this is also what the film shows. However, it supports homosexuals and this is a truly progressive message for its time. The couple is likable, the blackmailer is the bad guy. It should not come as a surprise that people who worked on this movie in major roles, probably had a tough time working successfully under the Nazi regime 2 decades later. Conrad Veidt (not only because of his participation in "Casablanca" was a big name back then and I can see why. Yes there is the usual unnecessary overacting from silent films, but he certainly has his good moments too and carries this film nicely from start to finish. Today, almost a century later, gay-themed (short) films are very frequent and frequently very bad. I wish the makers of this new generation of movie about this subject would watch stuff like "Anders als die Anderen". Maybe this could teach them how to make a quality film. Good watch and I recommend it.
  • Two male musicians fall in love, but blackmail and scandal makes the affair take a tragic turn.

    Director Richard Oswald was bold in making this film and pushing the message that homosexuality was not a crime but a failure of society to be accepting. Especially at the time when homosexuality was blatantly illegal in Germany. Not surprisingly, the film was soon banned and almost completely destroyed.

    Conrad Veidt was also bold for starring in it, even if he had not yet been made into a star for "Cabinet of Dr. Caligari" the following year. This was at least Veidt's second time working with Oswald, having just finished up "Uncanny Stories".

    The plot is interesting in making the presentation that homosexuality is normal (definitely a minority view at the time) and the real crime was extortion from those who would blackmail closeted men. Although neither Oswald nor Veidt were gay, they clearly had sympathy for their brethren (Veidt was later better known for standing up for the Jewish community).
  • This 1919 German silent film has to be the earliest queer film I've seen. This, along with two other films made in Weimar Germany - 'Michael' and 'Sex in Chains' - stands as landmark in queer cinema. The movie is really ahead of its time; from the story treatment to the informed way of handling the theme of homosexuality, many countries can learn how artists of ages past (this one almost a century ago) have tried to tackle such subjects with grace and their own unique style. Many might be get annoyed by the long expository monologues, but considering the time and the intention of the film, it's completely understandable; movies have the power to enrich.

    The film was adapted decades later in Britain - 'Victim', and the sad thing is that in countries like India, where such law sections are relevant even till this date, such a theme hasn't been explored properly on screen. I've always believed that informed exposure to a subject is a giant step closer to understanding and acceptance of it.

    The actor Conrad Veidt who's the lead in the film becomes a star with his next year's film , 'The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari', and even has a small role in 'Casablanca' as a Nazi (funnily, he fled from the Nazis to England).

    Overall, interesting story and brilliant treatment.
  • Venarde21 January 2005
    A frank story of homosexual love and tragedy made 85 years ago, featuring such amazing things as a same-sex dance hall and a drag ball as background to dramatic scenes. It still packs a wallop, thanks to its purpose as an impassioned plea for justice and a wonderful central performance by the Conrad Veidt. Kino has just released this reconstructed version of about 50 minutes, based in large part on a print discovered in Moscow, with intertitles and a few stills telling the rest. It's a an effective drama and a fascinating history lesson. A good bit is still missing, but the most amazing things turn up, so maybe more of Anders als die Andern will as well. To have this much is wonderful.
  • The troublesome Weimar period was a controversial era full of social and political problems, a time of delicate German democracy, a time of scarce freedom but it permitted to develop different cultural showings, experimental and avant-garde oeuvres that even today astonish modern people of nowadays for their audacity.

    "Anders Als Die Andern" (a.k.a. "Different From The Others" ), was a film directed by the important Teutonic film director Herr Richard Oswald. It is a film that it might only have been made in such controversial and free Weimar times. It is a film that probably is the first gay openly silent film in commercial terms (amazingly it is to know that "Anders…" had a notorious commercial importance in those days). It's an oeuvre that is outstanding for its historical importance, not to mention its social, informative, enlightened aspect. Depicted in the film is a lecture about the German law of Paragraph 175 which was a restricted law that punished gay people in Deutschland. This was written by Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld, a remarkable and pioneering German sexologist and gay rights advocate, who explains the social and inner conflicts of gay people in a modern way while forgetting misunderstandings, complexes or even topics about such a human group.

    The social and psychological aspects of the film are very remarkable; the hypocrisy, social behaviour, from strangers to relatives, against gay groups unfortunately is present today. Herr Conrad Veidt's performance ( who was "discovered" by and collaborated with Herr Oswald in many films ) as a tormented man who has to deal with social incomprehension, blackmail and social discrimination ends up finally in ostracism. This happens in a tragic way ( as is anticipated at the beginning of the film ). Emphasized and denounced are many conflicts; avoided are historical topics and repetitive mannerisms of gay people thus giving seriousness, humanity and visibility for the first time in the silent screen to the gay movement.

    And now, if you'll allow me, I must temporarily take my leave because this German Count must be gay in tonight's soirée.

    Herr Graf Ferdinand Von Galitzien http://ferdinandvongalitzien.blogspot.com/
  • This film stars Conrad Veidt and came "out" on the heels of Cabinet of Dr. Caligari's success (1919). It was banned after a short run in Germany where theater goers were harassed at showings. It seems very brave of Conrad Veidt and the makers of the film to make a sympathetic, sexually charged film about homosexuals in 1919. The story is about a man who is blackmailed after making advances on a stranger he meets at a men only dance. Found in the 1970's, the remaining footage is a testament to the great forward thinking German Expressionist film makers. Available on video from Facets, this film will appeal to film historians, Conrad Viedt fans, and gay groups.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The character of Franz here is a real smarmy hustler type who victimizes gay men he picks up in Berlin gay bars and threatens to squeal on for breaking some morals law. The sad thing is that he's breaking the law, but he has the upper hand. For concert violinist Conrad Veidt, that's the sad story of his life, and here, his story is documented, and there's only few moments of happiness when he seems to find real love. The film is greatly edited from its original form (utilizing stills and newly created title cards to help move the action along with what remains), so it's not the product that German film audiences saw between 1919 and 1920 when it was banned. What remains is a compassionate portrayal of an aging gay man who becomes the mentor of a young violin player, the romance that follows between them, and the threats of scandal that tear them apart. Flashbacks to Veidt's younger self (with another actor portraying the character during his school years who looks very much like a younger Veidt himself) show all of the trauma he's gone through, with a rather effeminate schoolmaster coming between the younger version of Veidt's character and the fellow student who can't seem to live without him. The blackmailer, Franz, is seen in a cabaret consorting with a very unattractive, yet effeminate man who seems to be a part of the blackmail scheme, making it appear that if you were not attractive enough to find companionship, you would do what you could to prevent somebody else from finding it.

    The newly made dialog or letter cards seem sort of forced and not like real letters or pieces of dialog, so that becomes one of the film's few detriments. A scene of a costume ball shows men dancing with men, women dancing with women, and Franz lingering around Veidt to pretend to make a play for him. A real life sexologist is there to provide a scientific reason that homosexuality exists and to show the audience that there is nothing unnatural about it. This was banned because it put a positive light on the reasons for homosexuality, and was considered almost like an invitation to become gay. Veidt's character has some effeminate mannerisms, but in a confrontation with Franz, shows that he has the strength to carry the upper hand, so he's no limp wristed "poof". A disturbing party scene has Veidt being molested by female college students hoping to "straighten him out", but Veidt's reaction to all this shows that he is who he is, and like Jerry Herman wrote for "La Cage Aux Folles", didn't need no excuses. The ending is a downer but has an element of hope, looking fifty years into the future when gay liberation really began to move forward.
  • This film deals with a prosperous man who encounters a sleazy blackmailer who discovers that he is gay. (This silent rarity is a good reason for film preservation!)

    A much later film "Victim", deals with a similar subject.
  • Conrad Veidt plays a famous musician who is blackmailed for being gay. Eventually he stands trial and is convicted. At the end the Film pleads for the abolition of § 175(The Paragraph which punishes homosexuality).

    The making of such a film was only possible because after WWI there were no Censorship laws in Germany. After a wave of sexually explicit films they were reinstalled and 'Anders als die andern' was banned for the public in Aug.1920. Not until 1957 would homosexuality be a main topic in a film again (Anders als Du und Ich).

    Sadly this historic film is lost. But Portions of it were incorporated into another film (Gesetze der Liebe/Laws of Love,1927) and survived. These have been restored to a length of 41 min..
  • From the outset, it needs to be stated that there are definite content warnings in 'Anders als die Andern' for homophobia, and suicide. More than that: the picture is wrapped up in so much extraordinary and dire real-life history - people, places, and events - that require utmost attention and remembrance, but that most assuredly also carry the same notices. For all that, it's also deeply unfortunate that not only is there accordingly perhaps only a single print remaining in existence, but that the footage that remains also seems to be incomplete, as indicated by heavy use of intertitles and/or still images to fill in for scenes that are otherwise unaccounted for. I would be deeply curious to learn of efforts to restore and preserve such a precious title. And it is precious indeed, for it would by all means appear that 'Different from the others' is the first motion picture to promote gay rights, and acceptance of the LGBTQ community. The movie is neck-deep in history - and it is profoundly historic in and of itself. With all this in mind, before even considering the content proper, it's an essential viewing experience.

    The fate of the Institute for Sexual Research, that to an extent funded this endeavor, is all too well known (and still not widely enough), though the name of founder Magnus Hirschfeld is less famous. That's a great pity, for while still behind by the standards of 2021, he certainly seems to have been a man far, far ahead of his time - astoundingly progressive for any cross-section of the 20th century, let alone his own - and his collaboration with director Richard Oswald on the screenplay here is paramount. The story told within is all too real, ripped from the pages of reality, and carries the most urgent of messages. With 'Different from the others' less than whole as it exists, it's difficult to purely assess every possible aspect, but it surely seems to me that the characters are complex and diverse, with strong personalities, yet with each part left with room to be explored as the actors would. The narrative and scene writing alike are dynamic and absorbing, filled with great sincerity and emotional weight, and it's a shame there's simply not more of it for us to see. And for that matter, too, the cast is excellent - Conrad Veidt should be very familiar to anyone who has sampled early German cinema, and he portrays protagonist Paul Körner with gratifying nuanced range and physicality. And so it is as well with his co-stars, including Reinhold Schünzel, oozing smarm as antagonist Franz Bollek. Once more - ah, what we must be missing with a title that is partially lost.

    Crucial as 'Different from the others' is in the history of cinema and LGBTQ rights alike, and critically important as its message is, the feature rides a delicate line. When a message is first and foremost in any piece of media - movie, song, or otherwise - it's commonly seen that the artistic craft of the work suffers owing to that singular focus. The emphatic use of intertitles to relate scenes that are lost to time, war, and censorship is furthered with large blocks of text as Hirschfeld, appearing as himself before the camera, imparts long speeches advocating for the gay community and the advancement of research. Significant as they are in all ways, these have the unfortunate effect of threatening to shake us from our engagement with the picture. However, even with but a fragment of 'Anders als die Andern' before us, there is still sufficient lovingly rendered cinematic marvel to provide balance, and keep the movie afloat. It's a noteworthy inelegance, but not enough to completely bog down the picture.

    I repeat myself, but I wish so much that we could have a complete, unmarred presentation of this feature as it was written and filmed. Unfortunately, that's just not how the past 102 years played out. Nonetheless, I think this is a very well made film that manages to overcome the indelicacy of thrusting a core message to the forefront. Frankly, in so many ways, I dare say this is essential viewing: as a work of early cinema; as a groundbreaking movie championing LGBTQ rights; as a picture that the worst people in the world tried to obliterate (and no doubt still would, if their successors had their way); and, very plainly, on its own merits as a motion picture, a story being told. Again, content warnings are necessary, not least of all should viewers embark on reading up on all the incredible and sad history to which this is directly or indirectly tied. But I enthusiastically encourage all comers to find and watch 'Different from the others' if you can - this is a landmark that altogether must be seen.
  • EdgarST13 April 2024
    Very good drama, even in the fragmented version that has survived. Although it is a fictional story, it seems sometimes like an anthropological portrait of homosexuals (and a few lesbians seen in the café scene) during the 1910s. Conrad Veidt (who has been called the "most beautiful travestite of Berlin nights" in the 1910-20s) is very moving and convincing as the victim of the "hygienic society" in which he has to live, learn, and fight for his sexual orientation against the homophobic law that used to rule the lives of the "third sex", as homosexuals were called; and criminal harassment by common people. Worth a look.
  • It is hard to vote for this film, because it is really just the shreds of a film. The odd thing is that ONLY the parts of the story relevant to gay sensibilities remain: the relationship between the violinist Paul Körner (Veidt) and his youthful protegé, the scenes of all-male partying, Paul making a pass at the man who turns out to be a blackmailer, and apparently the slide-show lecture on the sexual continuum (though perhaps this was reconstructed from the historical sexologist's actual slide shows?). Besides this, there is the skeleton of the legal plot: Paul reading about suicides and knowing what's behind it, the judge giving the blackmailer 3 years and Paul one week, and Paul coming home to kill himself.

    What you don't see is any scene at all with a woman in it, except for one where young Paul runs in terror from a whorehouse. Evidently there were two sets of parents and a young woman all active in the original film, and they all ended up being cut from the final film.

    There is not much development of the character of the boy Paul loves--it is not quite clear from the end whether he mourns Paul as a self-sacrificing friend, a great violinist, or the love of his life. Paul himself, in an extended flashback, evidently realized he was gay at the moment a whore kissed him; the fill-in titles explain that a young woman of dubious morals kissed the boy at a point after his story has disappeared from the surviving clips of the film. So presumably the boy has realized that, since he does not like being kissed by a woman, he must be gay and love Paul after all. It's an odd logic, redeemed only by Veidt's combination of sensuality and morality (great moment when he starts eagerly kissing a pick-up and then is horrified when the man asks for money).

    Veidt is pretty amazing. The man played vampires or at least exotic sexual predators, Jews, Nazis in Allied films, a Devil's Island inmate--every kind of marginal monster; in one movie he seems to be playing Jesus. When he played kings, he played them mad and/or deformed. Yet he gave every character an edge, a dignity, a strength that made you feel it wasn't right if he got shot in the back. In this film, he looks rather like Cesare from Cabinet of Dr. Caligari but the same skeletal-elegant physique and haunted quality (and haunted makeup) become expressions of human sorrow, longing, and a frail nobility of character.

    It is interesting to compare this film to Victim, made 42 years later. In both stories, the protagonist is a man who discovered and explored his sexual feelings for other men as a schoolboy; as a mature adult, having achieved a position of great prestige, he becomes involved in an unconsummated relationship with a much younger man who admires him passionately. In both stories, a law makes homosexuals an easy target of blackmailers, and both men attempt to defy the blackmailers and the law. In the 1919 movie, however, Körner, after attempting to redirect his sexual desires by various means, accepts himself as the way he is and lives a gay lifestyle (or so we may assume from his activities at the drag ball). When he is confronted with the prospect of marriage, he sends his parents or prospective girlfriend to a sexologist so that they, too, can accept him as he is. If he does not try to seduce his protegé, it is presumably from a sense that it would be wrong to exploit his position of power over a very young, indeed virginal, student (and the boy is horrified when he realizes that the relationship is potentially sexual). Melvin Farr, on the other hand, has succeeded in redirecting his sexual desires: he is married to a cool blonde and together they are confident that he is, if not completely heterosexual, completely monogamous. No gay bars for him. The boy with whom he is in love, on the other hand, is frankly gay and would like to seduce his hero. In both stories, the tragic "victim" is the man who, openly and unreservedly gay, is vulnerable to blackmail, tries to protect the man he loves, and finally kills himself. The earlier movie has a distinguished doctor arguing that there is a sexual continuum which is natural and good, and should not be subject to legal penalties or blackmail; the later movie just has examples of presumably good (eminent) men who happen to have secret homosexual sides, and the hero's nobility lies in going to bat for a working-class boy who could not keep his own sexuality secret.

    I am struck by the fact that both the tragic victims look physically frail--thin, as if worn to a bone in the hope that if they turn sideways they will be overlooked by society. Both the ambiguously sexual survivors are heartier types, physically more solid and substantial, though of course Dirk Bogarde could out-edge even Veidt.
  • Kirpianuscus18 November 2018
    After almost a century after its apparition, it remains more than great. But a perfect film. For the mark of Magnus Hirschfeld, for the delicacy of exploration of theme, for the cinematography and for the freshness. The rafined performance of Conrad Veidt represents one of basic motifs for see the film. In same measure, spectacular is the grace of the portrait of forbidden passion , giving wise answer to contemporary problems. A film about love and its price. Amazing for the profound and touching honesty. And, sure, a legendary page of history.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Though many historians agree that Anders als die Andern was the first Gay feature film, a few have come before it. If interested in early images of Queerness, we can look all the way back to Dickson Experimental Sound Film from 1894! Though only a few moments long, the film is also arguably the very first sound film. Though many have contested that the film may not have been "purposefully" gay, the image of two men dancing together is definitely an image seldom seen or repeated for many years. Sadly, images of queer women seem to be completely lacking in early film (though of course I'd love to be proved wrong). Yet, Anders als die Andern continues to be an important precedent, a treasure that has been able to come out of the vault.