Orochi (1925) User Reviews (7)

One of the few silent chambara films to survive in relatively complete form

[psteier · 6/10 · 4 June 2000]

Tsumasaburo Bando plays a young but hotheaded samurai. He falls in love with two women (Misao Seki and Utako Tamaki) but he cannot convince either that he is a good man. He becomes a killer trying to save one of them from a criminal who had rescued him after some time in jail.

The final extended fight scene is wonderful. The print also comes with a 'benshi' (film explainer) performance. He does the voices of all the characters and explains the action.

Chambara (from the sound of swords striking one another during a fight) is the Japanese name for samurai warrior pictures. They were a very important genre in the early days of Japanese cinema, but surviving films are rare.

Remarkable Film from 1925

[Hitchcoc · 8/10 · 26 April 2021]

From a technical standpoint this is wonderful. There are great sword fighting scenes, panoramic camera shots, and good characters. Of course, as is always a battle for a westerner, I have been slow to embrace the Japanese history, the caste system. Here, a man who does not deserve to be persecuted, is attacked over and over because he is poor and has few options. He falls in love tragically and this leads to even more pain. I assume this was a statement film about life's cruelty.

An amazing experience

[moviebuf-814-739607 · 8/10 · 16 December 2015]

I had the good fortune of watching this movie with live piano music, narrated by the wonderful benshi Kataoka Ichiro. The experience as a whole was easily my favourite movie-going experience in recent memory.

The (anti-)hero of the movie, Heisaburo, is a young samurai. He tries to do good by upholding his sense of bushido, while pining for the attention of the woman of his dreams. Unfortunately, his sense of honour keeps getting him into trouble, and public opinion quickly turns against him.

Heisaburo writhes like a snake -- Orochi means snake or serpent -- while trying to stay alive, down on his luck.

Unlike many movies of its time, the fight scenes are nicely choreographed and fast. They manage to convey Heisaburo's prowess as a martial artist, without resorting to either camp over-acting or slow kabuki-style action.

The movie caused some minor controversy in 1925 Japan. It was banned for a time, and forced to change its title from Outlaw to Serpent. It was deemed "improper" to have an outlaw as a hero. Apparently universal male suffrage in Japan (1925) was a large political hurdle. The more conservative members of government wanted assurances and compromises. Cracking down on "improper behaviour" was a sad side-effect of that.

If you can watch this movie with a narrator, then I strongly encourage you to. It's a wonderful tradition that is on the verge of extinction.

Sword of Doom

[chaos-rampant · 9 November 2011]

Lately I have been trying to pluck the roots of cinema, looking for images from the first hours. Especially intriguing images that have shaped entire cinematic worlds by now. For my next entry from Japan I finally get to see the grandfather of chambara, as a big fan of the genre a film I have been looking forward to for a long time.

Storywise, it was meant to caution audiences on the deception of appearances; that the most noble authority may be masking evil, and a crook may be a victim of unjust prejudice and at heart a hero. It is all structured around a young, honorable samurai's descent into anomie and lawless violence, the reason offered for this is not just the unreliable human eye prone to make judgments from ignorance but the very nature of a world floating with fleeting images.

But of course we have been watching all along and know who is pure at heart. It works perfectly as a tragedy about organized injustice, an indictment of a Tokugawa society of absolute power and reckless vice, but double-times better as a metaphysical treatise on the sankaras of the clouded mind, to borrow from Buddhist terminology, that power the cycle of human suffering.

It is superb stuff and not just for the time. There was a long precedent of these types of film on the kabuki stage; with the intense artifice of that stage and its striking poses. But the film is serpentine with vitality, the eye prodding.

It ends with a protracted fight scene redolent with agonies of the soul, as would grow to be the chambara tradition in everything from Killing in Yoshiwara and Sword of Doom to the Lone Wolf films. The karmic sword slashing inwards in a dissolution of the self. The camera steals a sweeping panorama of this as it unfurls across the screen.

The actor playing the lead was one of the first jidaigeki stars. Everyone who yielded a sword afterwards, Tatsuya Nakadai, Shintaro Katsu, Tomisaburo Wakayama, they owe no small debt to what he accomplished here. For the finale, to accompany the wonderfully unceremonial aragoto ('rough style') of his performance his face is subtly made-up in devilish hues from kabuki, to connect the audience with where these stories were first conceived.

He is not finally allowed to perform seppuku or die in battle, that would have been more heroic than the censors of the time could tolerate. But the finale affects with just the turn of life in this fleeting suffering world.

Give a Dog a Bad Name

[boblipton · 6/10 · 27 April 2018]

I've long known that Samurai movies have a long history in Japan -- one of the Lumiere actualities from 1898 is ACTEURS JAPONAIS: BATAILLE AU SABRE. However this movie is the earliest full-fledged Samurai feature I've seen. In it, Tsumasaburô Bandô is a young samurai with ideals and a short temper. He develops a reputation as a bully and gets kicked out of his position for trying to defend the reputation of his calligraphy master's daughter -- no one will listen to his explanations. He takes to the road as a ronin and falls in with bad companions, always wondering why no one will see the good heart beneath his fearsome reputation.

This movie is offered as a tragedy of society's failure (the version I watched had a simultaneous Japanese and Russian audio track that made me think it must have done well in Soviet Russia as an indictment of Pre-Revolutionary society). I thought it was an indictment of people who failed to show a little forethought in their actions; if Our Hero (as the narrator referred to him) had shown a little discretion, he might have done a lot better for himself.

Nonetheless, one watches westerns for the riding and the gunplay, and one watches Samurai movies fo the fight scenes, and there are some fine ones here, particularly the big finale. Although my cynical take on Our Hero rendered many serious sections comic, this is well worth watching as an early example of the genre.

A masterful work about appearance and reality.

[ofpsmith · 9/10 · 2 July 2019]

Orochi (or Serpent as I've heard it referred to in English) is very much told like a folk tale with a prevalent moral. The moral is to not judge a book by its cover, a very common lesson. In the beginning of the film the benshi explains how its perfectly possible for someone commonly reviled as a villain could be completely innocent and that its equally possible for someone revered as a hero to be corrupt. Heizaburo Kuritomi (Tsumasaburo Bando) is an exceedingly unlucky man. A young samurai in the service of his master Hyozan Matsusumi (Misao Seki), he has a less well to do background than his peers. On Matsusumi's birthday the samurai are drinking sake and having a wild old time when Shinpachiro Namioka (Momotaro Yamamura) offers Heizaburo a glass of sake out of boredom. Heizaburo declines and an offended Namioka rudely accosts him and throws sake in his face. A fight breaks out and after it is broken up Heizaburo finds himself with the blame. Warned against getting into any more fights he battles a group of traveling samurai who talk smack about Namie (Utako Tamaki), the daughter of Matsusumi. Again faced with blame Heizaburo is banished first from Matsumi's service and then the town. Years pass as he lives life as a ronin, wandering Japan. Before long he again finds himself in trouble with no one sticking up for him until Jirozo Akagi (Kichimatsu Nakamura) a respected local nobleman takes him in. As was foretold earlier he turns out to be a villain. Its a sad film, especially in how Heizaburo gets spat upon by everyone for really no reason other than...well, everyone else does it. His consistent attempts to explain that he's innocent are all futile. It's a common lesson and in this case its told very well. Furthermore, the cinematography was pretty surpringly innovative, at least to me. Especially the final fight scene. I've never seen a Japanese silent film before so I don't know how often the type of split second shots of someone's face or weapon were used in other Japanese fims at the time. Either way I can't imagine it would have been that easy to do such a thing in the silent era. The tracking shot of the scene was very impressive as well. Obviously this isn't the oldest scene of some grand final battle. Numerous older films included grander spectacles. But I don't seem to recall there being a tracking shot in Battleship Potemkin or Intolerance (the D.W. Griffith film.) Although very tragic, Orochi is a masterful early work of Japanese cinema.

A Totally New Samurai Movie, One With Lasting Effect

[springfieldrental · 8/10 · 9 February 2022]

Samurai films in Japan during the mid-1920s were increasingly popular in the thriving cinema market of the Land of the Rising Sun. Although not laden with multiple sword fights, these movies highlight the noblesse battling evil criminal elements to preserve the Japanese way of living.

Actor-turned-film producer Tsumasaburo "Bantsuma" Bando, in his second independent movie, released an entirely different samurai motion picture, November 1925's "Orochi." In it, the portrayal of a few noble samurai wearing false masks are the actual villains in the film, unique in early Japanese movies. The hero in "Orochi" isn't some rich guy; he's a member of the lower class. Kunitomi (Bantsuma) possesses all the positive traits of a noble, including an underlying sense of loyalty to his master and an expertise in sword fighting. The movie follows him through a series of unfortunate circumstantial incidents, casting him in an unfair villainous light.

The first misfortune occurs to him when he attends his master's birthday party. As the sake flows throughout the partiers' guts (with the exception of Kunitomi), one young samurai offers him a glass. When he refuses, the hot-headed samurai hurls the drink in his face. After the fight, Kunitomi gets blamed for the incident. Another event happens when a group of noble samurai insult his master's daughters, sending Kunitomi into another brawl. He gets banished from his hometown, labeled as a criminal.

Bantsuma's film was originally titled 'The Outlaw.' But an increasingly militance stance by the Japanese government created a hostile atmosphere, forcing him to change the title's name. He settled on "Orochi," meaning serpent. He felt his style of sword play was similar to a fighter slithering like a snake all the while he felt the censors would be happy seeing his hero described in despicable term. Bantsuma was required to cut and reshoot 20% of the film because censors were displeased with his portrayal of the nobles at writ large.

"Orochi's" fame in cinema is the concluding battle, which captures an entirely new style of sword fighting. The fast-paced, quick-edited sequence of Kunitomi battling a group of samurai set a standard in the genre. One unusual aspect of his sword fighting is he doesn't look at the person he's killing. As the weapon enters his victim's body he's already on alert for the next fighter he'll take on. So impressive were the martial sequences in his movie that Bantsuma was given the nickname "The King of Swordfights."

Bantsuma produced and directed a number of films after his landmark "Orochi," well into the early 1950s. But of all the movies he made, there was one that he held in the highest esteem. He kept only one negative print of a movie in his personal library, and that was "Orochi."