Remember When? (1925) User Reviews (3)

Quintessential Langdon, which means it's not for everybody

[wmorrow59 · 7/10 · 3 December 2001]

Silent comedy is not everyone's cup of tea, but even among fans it seems that Harry Langdon is an acquired taste: either you like him, or you wonder how in the world anyone could like him. I happen to like him, at least most of the time, and I enjoyed Remember When? a great deal, but that doesn't mean everyone will. It has an oddly structured story that sort of meanders along, and it's not consistently funny, but, like Harry Langdon himself, it's unassuming, quirky and beguiling. Langdon doesn't strain for laughs, not here anyway, and the relaxed tempo is a pleasant surprise, certainly for a Sennett production. It's basically a simple tale of a boy and girl separated for a long time and then reunited, but with some pretty weird twists along the way. When our hero spends much of his time homeless and stealing chickens (to eat, that is), while the girl works as a bearded lady in a circus, we know we're not dealing with conventional Hollywood storytelling.

It's said that the European Surrealists of the '20s, such as Salvador Dali and Man Ray, loved these comedies and found poetry in Mack Sennett's slapstick farces; if that's so, Remember When? may well be the sort of fare they enjoyed. At one point, when Harry is attacked by bees, there is a close-up of the back of his neck as the insects crawl slowly across it that looks like something out of Buñuel's Un Chien Andalou. This close-up is followed by a long-shot of Harry's wild contortions as the bees sting him, and the fact that we are now clearly watching a stuntman who carefully hides his face while doubling for the star comic doesn't matter at all, any more than it matters when W.C. Fields drives his car in front of blatant rear-projection screens in his films, or that the Oliver Hardy who falls off the roof in L&H two-reelers is a obviously stuffed dummy. Even when we're presented with images of pain, humiliation, and disaster, the freewheeling spirit of these comedies prevails and jollies us along. In Langdon's case, the bit with the stunt double is amusing (because it's so unreal?) and just enhances the anything-can-happen mood.

On the other hand, the close-up of the fully bearded leading lady gazing sadly after Harry is startling and disturbing. It's a relief when her beard falls off-- and funny when Harry hurls the furry thing to the ground and stomps it, as if it were a dangerous beast --but even the final clinch between the reunited lovers can't quite 'normalize' what we've just seen. Langdon himself is such an odd, amorphous, grown-up baby-man; seeing him paired off with a bearded lady, even when we're aware of her fakery, causes a touch of queasiness. No wonder some people are put off by Harry Langdon's comedies: there's something unsettling about him and the universe he inhabits, and even the seemingly happy fade-outs can leave us feeling a little uneasy. In some of his films, especially later on, Langdon and his collaborators failed to create a satisfying balance of ingredients and the oddity of his character overwhelmed the comedy, but his better efforts such as Remember When? offer an intriguing mix of humor, pathos, and outright weirdness. There was no one else quite like Harry.

Despite having very few laughs this is a sweet though strange comedy short

[planktonrules · 7/10 · 16 August 2008]

This is one of the oddest Harry Langdon shorts I've seen. While the plot outline is pretty conventional, the details are indeed quite strange. A boy and girl grow up as friends and are separated. Years pass and they stumble back together and have no idea who the other one is until the end of the film. Now as far as the odd angles go, Harry as a child ran away from an orphanage (that's how the two separated) and despite looking like the world's tallest three year-old, became a hobo who steals chickens! As for the girl, she's now with a traveling circus and plays the bearded lady!! Remember, I did mention that the actual details were strange!!

This short comedy is different from most comedies of the day--even Langdon's own shorts. This isn't just because of the odd plot points but because this short is so story-driven and there aren't that many laughs. In many ways, it's like one of Harold Lloyd's full-length films in style--but crammed into less than 20 minutes. I didn't mind this at all since it was a sweet and enjoyable film. And, while there weren't tons of laughs, the chicken stealing scenes were pretty funny.

While I never will concede that Harry Langdon was one of the greatest silent comedians (something that Robert Youngson asserted in WHEN COMEDY WAS KING), this is a very good film and shows that Langdon films are worth seeking today. There's a four DVD set of his shorts from All Day Entertainment/Lobster Films and it's well worth finding.

Harry Langdon survives working with children AND animals

[hte-trasme · 9/10 · 8 November 2009]

This is indeed a strange, sad, and sweet little story to be the focus of Mack Sennett comedy short. Harry Langdon the bindle-carrying tramp accidentally joins the circus and almost misses being reunited with the love of his childhood, now a false bearded lady. It's true that there aren't many overt jokes here, just the outline of a charming but quirky story, and some very strange set-pieces.

At this point, Harry Langdon doesn't need over, constructed gags (though some situations are developed well enough to work like that such as when he shows off his stolen chicken in front of a cop -- but even there most of the laughs come from his sheepish reactions to being caught and attempts to hide). Instead, we see Langdon put in an unfortunate situation, and the comedy is in his response, whatever it be. The plot point is that he accidentally picks up a bee-hive, and hilarious things come from the fact that he doesn't even seem to know what bees are.

So the sweet story does what it does, and the bizarre set pieces -- many strangely appropriate, such as Langdon being a pied piper to a crowd of children. There's a great subtlety to this two-reel comedy, with wonderful laughs coming between the lines of something poignant and charming. Plus it's a lot of fun to watch. This is a great chance to see a representative Langdon film with the comedian at his best.