User Reviews (47)

Add a Review

  • Silent film may be the only unique art form ever to have flourished and then become extinct. The great irony—indeed, tragedy—of its demise is that it reached its peak only in the last few years before the talkie revolution. Silent films from 1927 through 1930 dazzle with their fluid and sophisticated mastery of visual storytelling; the last thing they need is dialogue. F.W. Murnau's City Girl is a perfect example of this artistry, and what happened to it. The follow-up to Murnau's legendary masterpiece Sunrise, City Girl was made during the waning days of silents, and in a concession to the changeover to sound it was re-cut before its release and given a recorded score featuring singing farmhands. Not surprisingly, the hybrid film sank like a stone. Miraculously, an original silent print survived and was rediscovered in the vaults at 20th Century-Fox. I first saw it at the National Film Theatre in London during a Murnau retrospective. I'd never heard of it, but when I went to see Nosferatu the speaker introducing it added, "Be sure to come back next week and see City Girl—it's better than Sunrise!" This claim would be very hard to defend, but while lacking the transcendence of Sunrise, City Girl is in some ways a more complex and interesting work.

    It also defends the honor of city girls from the laughably caricatured vamp who causes all the trouble in Sunrise. Like the earlier film, City Girl deals with the clash between urban and rural values, but here the countryside is no more pure or wholesome than the city. Unlike the vague, timeless setting of Sunrise, City Girl's milieu is the contemporary American Midwest. Kate (Mary Duncan) is a waitress in a busy Chicago lunchroom who lives in a dreary tenement and dreams of escaping the city. She meets Lem (Charles Farrell), a naïve and sweet-natured farm boy who has been sent to the city to sell his family's wheat crop. They fall in love, marry, and set out for the wheat-fields. But Kate's dreams are shattered by Lem's harsh, tyrannical father (David Torrence), and she finds herself waiting on rowdy, leering farmhands who are even worse than the lunchroom customers. Kate loses faith in Lem when he is unable to stand up to his father, and the marriage appears to be over almost before it began, until a series of melodramatic events force the various characters to examine their true motives and feelings.

    Every aspect of this story is expressed through visual details. We are introduced to Lem on the train to Chicago, eating hand-packed sandwiches, oblivious to the flirtations of a vamp across the aisle whose interest is aroused by his bankroll (we know right off this isn't going to be Sunrise II.) We see Kate sassily quashing passes from customers ("What do you do in the evenings?" "YOU'LL never know!") and we see her in her dingy little room, watering a pathetic dusty flower on the fire-escape and listening to a wind-up mechanical bird while the El rushes past the window. The sweaty, chaotic bustle of the lunchroom is captured with tremendous verve. Once the scene moves to the country, the symbolism of wheat becomes the heart of the film (which Murnau wanted to call "Our Daily Bread.") In a ravishing scene, the newlyweds run through a glistening, swirling field of grain; when they arrive at the house, Lem's little sister greets Kate with a bouquet of wheat stalks. When the dour father enters, he rebukes her for wasting their cash crop; to him grain only means money. He also notices that Kate has put her cloche hat down on the family bible, and he is convinced that she's a floozy who sees Lem as a gravy train.

    The Torrence brothers, David and Ernest, specialized in hissable nastiness, but here David's worried, American Gothic face conveys the hard life that has turned this man into a monster. It's hard to believe he could be genetically linked to a sweet-faced, curly-haired cutie like Charles Farrell, but he does make Lem's anguished weakness believable. Mary Duncan is perfect as a feisty yet vulnerable working girl, a type that would become much more common in early talkies. Duncan left the screen in 1933 when she married a polo player named "Laddie" Sanford. She lived to be 98, but her retirement was Hollywood's loss. I would like to see this intelligent, natural, black-eyed actress in something else.

    City Girl is marred by an ending that feels rushed and unconvincing, but it raises interesting, at times troubling themes concerning marriage, traditional gender roles and family relationships. The most poignant aspect of this exquisitely directed film is not that it was one of the last silent movies made in Hollywood, but that its director would die in a car crash just three years later, at the age of forty-two. That was cinema's loss.
  • David-24021 June 1999
    Was Murnau the greatest director ever? His life was cut short by a car accident in 1931, when he was 42 years old. What magical films he would have made had he lived.

    "City Girl" is a fairly conventional story of a young man from the country who falls in love with a waitress on his first trip to the city. He marries her and brings her home to a hostile father. But Murnau takes this material and turns it into an expressionist exploration of sexuality, powering it with a theme of "it's not where we live but how we live". Within a world of hostile shadows and menacing crowds real people live and breathe in brilliant naturalistic performances. Farrell and Duncan are amazingly good. And even the smallest part is played with vivid life.

    But the real star is Murnau's startling direction. Tracking shots years ahead of their time - watch the scene where the couple run through a field of wheat - extraordinary point of view shots, and remarkable shots of and in fast moving wagons. The frightening city seen in "Sunrise" is here again - with trains and crowds obscuring vision and soot on the pot plants. And then there is the beauty of the countryside and the harvesting of wheat.

    Murnau made what I believe to be the best silent film ever with "Sunrise" in 1927. With "City Girl" he comes close to matching it. A must. I saw the original silent version which runs at 90 minutes. Apparently a shorter talkie version also exists.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    F. W. Murnau's 'forgotten' film probably isn't as good as Sunrise – and in fact looks like a pale imitation of it at times – but it's still better than much of Hollywood's output at the end of the 1920s. Big Charles Farrell plays Lem, an innocent country bumpkin whose lack of assertiveness threatens his still-to-be consummated marriage to city girl Mary Duncan. Lem's curmudgeonly father takes an instant dislike to his son's new bride, whom Lem impulsively wed while on a trip to sell Pop's harvest, believing she is a gold digger – which is a bit odd given that Lem failed to sell his harvest at the minimum price necessary to make ends meet. Despite the whirlwind nature of their romance, Kate really does love Lem even though he stands by and does nothing when his father knocks her about a bit…

    While the characters and their motives are strictly ordinary, it's Murnau's skill as a director that lifts City Girl above the ordinary. The juxtaposition between the stifling confines of the dirty city and the wide open spaces of Lem's homestead is subtly created, as is the change of emphasis from the depressing impact of technology on city dwellers to the equally distressing influence of personal relationships in the countryside. Murnau also creates enormous sympathy for the plight of Kate in spite of the relatively clichéd situation she finds herself in. She's no Lillian Gish type, dependent on a broad-shouldered hero to save her from her plight, but a spirited independent heroine in her own right who pretty much forces Farrell's insipid Lem to face up to – and eventually overcome – his glaring shortcomings.
  • I was so astonished by this movie that as soon as "The End" came up, I started watching it all over again. For one thing, the restoration of this forgotten classic was so stunning it was like watching a black and white movie made an hour ago. Each scene simply glowed with amazing grays and whites and charcoals. Mary Duncan as the 'City Gir' was absolutely enchanting. She was a sweet, young girl who was also feisty and was so believable and likable that she became someone you'd love to know. The movie's great loss is that she made only one other movie, 'Morning Glory" before leaving the screen to marry millionaire polo player. She only died recently at the age of 92 She was matched by silent screen great Charles Farrell who had t difficult role of Lem, who was also simple, sweet but manly, too. Although released in l930, this film confirms how incredibly smooth and profound silent movies had become. Director Murnau brilliantly cast and directed this amazing drama--proving to one and all what a profound loss silent movies became when they were overtaken by those noisy talkies. You should definitely check out this masterpiece and be amazed
  • Fairly familiar story, but told with real intimacy, restrained acting, and Murnau's always sensitive and virtuoso direction.

    Murnau has been compared to Welles, since both directors have cultured, poetic sensibilities, work brilliantly with actors, and constantly experiment, testing and expanding the expressive possibilities of the film medium, but here is the difference:

    Welles was an extrovert, a showman, parading his brilliance. Murnau, no less brilliant, is more subtle. His SUNRISE is to the silent era what CITIZEN KANE is to the sound era, but even in that film his innovations are "the art that conceals art".

    A casual viewer will see nothing in CITY GIRL but a nice story, well-executed. But the film is full of technical bravura for cinema fans: notice the perfection of the process shots in the opening train sequence. You didn't see this done as well in many major Hollywood films made even in the 1950s. Notice the farmhouse scenes where both the interiors and the brightly sunlit exteriors, visible through windows and doors, are PERFECTLY exposed. Even today, in the 21st century, we see films in which this isn't handled as well as Murnau & Co. do it here in 1928.

    I saw the 90 minute silent version, which is the one to seek out -- not the shortened, half-talkie version.

    Murnau's combination of technical brilliance, bold experimentation, superb direction of actors, and deep emotional sensitivity is practically unique in film history. He did EVERYTHING well. And if you have a chance to see his much earlier DER BRENNENDE ACKER (THE BURNING EARTH) see how much of this he was already achieving even with the primitive techniques and equipment of 1922. What a tragedy such a genius had to die in a car accident at the youthful age of 42.
  • zetes14 December 2008
    Murnau's third American film after Sunrise and the lost Four Devils, and his penultimate before Tabu. City Girl, of the surviving three, is the least seen. The reason for this must be its close resemblance to Sunrise, which is a masterpiece of the first order. Yes, City Girl does remind one of Sunrise in its mood and focus. A young rube from Minnesota (Charles Farrell) travels to Chicago to sell his father's wheat crop. Business-wise, the trip doesn't go well, but his romantic world blossoms when he meets up with a lonely waitress (Mary Duncan). The two marry, and the rest of the film deals with Duncan's fight for acceptance on the farm, where she faces a fierce opponent in her father-in-law (David Torrence). The film is romantic, emotionally moving and utterly beautiful. Yes, it is a lot like Sunrise, but, heck, who wouldn't want a second Sunrise? It's hardly a carbon copy, anyway, so it's like another wonderful gift. City Girl is a masterpiece, as well. I'm not the biggest fan of Murnau's German films, but his three surviving American films are probably the best proof of the sentiment that the silent cinema was at a miraculous level right when it was snuffed by sound. Murnau tragically died in an auto accident in 1931. I find it hard to imagine his work in the talkies, but I have an inkling that the cinema would be rather different if he had survived.
  • F.W. Murnau's penultimate film, City Girl was made just a year before his tragic death. It tells the rather simple story of a waitress named Kate (Mary Duncan) who, tired of her hectic schedule and overbearing boss, dreams of a simpler life. In steps farmer's son Lem (Charles Farrell) who is in the city in order to sell his father's product. The two fall in love, and Kate agrees to move to the country with Lem to live the farmer's life. Only after arriving, she realises that a farmer's life isn't as peaceful as she imagined, and she has to face Lem's irate father.

    Made as the silent era was sadly coming to an end, it was originally made as a hybrid, with long silent moments with the odd audible piece of dialogue. Apparently audiences could not take to its style and it bombed financially, but it has been recently re-discovered and restored in its complete silent form. And thank God it was, as although it comes nowhere near to the dizzying heights of Sunrise, the influential brilliance of Nosferatu, and the biting social commentary of The Last Laugh, it's a fine example of Murnau's ability as a filmmaker.

    It cleverly juxtaposes the naivety of the two leads who both sample a very different life, only to discover that it is every bit as stressful and brutal as their former lives. It's hardly groundbreaking, but Murnau handles the film with such a poetic elegance and intimacy rarely captured by other filmmakers. It makes it all the more tragic that most of his earlier films are now lost, including a version of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, and also that Murnau lost his life a year later after making his final film Tabu, to which he didn't make the premiere.

    www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
  • Minnesota farm boy Lem (Charles Ferrell) travels to the big city of Chicago for the first time to sell his family's annual wheat harvest. He meets tough-cookie waitress Kate (Mary Duncan) who dreams of a simpler life. The two fall for each other and get married, but they receive a less-than-warm reception back home from Lem's angry, tyrannical father (David Torrence). Kate is disappointed when Lem won't stand up to his father's violent ways, and things get more complicated when a work team arrives for the harvest, and the men start making advances on Kate.

    Although less artistically flashy than many of Murnau's films, this is stronger narratively. While Murnau was said to be disappointed that producer William Fox insisted on the casting of Duncan in the female lead (Murnau wanted to cast Janet Gaynor), I have to say that I was very impressed with Duncan's performance, and I consider it the highlight of the film. Torrence is also good as the mean father, and I like that he's given a nuanced background, showing that his ill-temper is a result of his worries over making ends meet and paying the bills, a source of stress for most farmers. The only drawback for me with this movie was that the end tied everything up a little too neatly to be believable. Recommended.
  • st-shot19 May 2017
    FW Murnau returns to his urban evil versus rural good theme in this visually striking but lean story involving a Minnesota farmer, a Chicago waitress and the external conflict created by their union.

    Hayseed Lem Tustine (Charles Farrell) is sent by his dad (David Torrence) to Chicago to sell his wheat crop at a set price. Fending off flirtation on the train he meets kate a waitress in a chaotic restaurant while the wheat price dips. After a whirlwind courtship they marry and he returns home with the a wife and bad news about the wheat. Seeing his son as a rube who lost money and now being exploited by a city girl he explodes chides and emasculates the son. When the help shows up to harvest the wheat they get an eyeful of Lem's wife and like what they see. Things really take a turn for the worse when the crop is threatened and the bunk house boys rebel.

    Given their similar theme and settings City Girl cannot avoid comparison to Murnau's classic Sunrise and while it does not rise to its stature, it retains his outstanding use of film language. Once again we have one of cinema's great visual storytellers unfold in image after image scenes of magnificent panorama and intense emotional close-up conveyed without utterance of a word. Scenes such as the camera riding on the wagon with the reapers and in a moment that teems with ironic beauty the arrival of the newlyweds in the wheat field at the farm glow with vitality and movement under the masterly hand of Murnau..

    Mary Duncan as Kate is a restrained Swanson who has her best scenes with the stern, violent father played by David Torrence in a restrained version of his bro Ernest. Edith Yorke cowers and frets as ma while Richard Alexander as Mac excels as a harboring menace. Charles Farrell is mealy and spineless in a reprise of his Sunrise character in the throes of moral dilemma but without that dark side his performance annoys.

    Flaws exist with some slow moments midway, the improbable actions of the hired hands and the father's stifling character limits the stories growth but Murnau for the most part provides us with more than a few gripping moments while deepening the cynicism and lasciviousness of his cast with expressive and informative closeups with little reliance on title cards. It is a thin story lushly told by a master.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    City Girl is another gem from the German master film maker F.W.Murnau, who directed the masterpiece, Sunrise.

    City Girl is similar to Sunrise in it's comparison of urban versus rural life and a conflicted relationship between a man and a woman. The couple, Kate and Lem meet in the crowded, gritty city of Chicago where Kate is living an uninspired existence as a waitress and an immediate attraction takes place. Lem is lonely too we gather and under the autocratic thumb of his father. He seems to be independent for the first time in his life, ( he's there to sell the wheat crop.) and makes the decision to marry Kate without asking his fathers approval. After they return to the farm, the conflicts between Lem and Kate and his father and the lead farmhand take place.

    This movie doesn't have the dream states, camera moves or super-impositions of the earlier film, but there are several good scenes, notably when the camera follows Lem and Kate as they run through the wheat fields, and the scenes of the wheat harvest which have such a real to life feel to them you almost feel that you're there as the work is going on! As human drama, a study of complicated interpersonal relationships, and the conflict between man and nature, I highly recommend this film! Murnau's masterful use of lighting is also present in this film, with the last scenes occurring at night with shadows so dark only lanterns can penetrate them, casting moody shadows and intensifying the action.
  • Friedrich Wilhelm Murnau treats the contrast between city and countryside in both "Sunrise" (1927) and in "City girl" (1930).

    In "Sunrise" he clearly chooses the side of the countryside, which is pure while the city is decadent. In the first half "City girl" seems to represent the same message. Look for example to the scene where slicing a homemade whole grain bread (countryside) is compared to measly slices of white bread rolling out of a machine (city). In the second half things turn out to be less clear. The bargirl who had married a farmer is on the countryside at least equally bothered with unwanted sexual advances by seasonal workers as she was in the city by guests of the bar.

    "City girl" was clearly a source of inspiration for Terrence Malick in making "Days of heaven" (1978). Elements such as the harvest threatened by natural elements and sexual tensions between members of the farming family and seasonal workers recur in this film.
  • True, it isn't "Sunrise" (what is?) and it isn't even the complete silent version as Murnau envisioned it, but it's still a beautifully expressive film from one of the great masters. What's more, it's the only film I've ever seen which pinpoints a pivotal moment in American history (it seems to be set before the Crash). One thing that precipitated the Great Depression was the squeeze on farmers, who had no profit margin at all, and whose only recourse was to plant more and more, unwittingly worsening their own situation. One of the conflicts is that Charles Farrell is sent to the city to sell the wheat crop at the most advantageous price (and this is a desperate necessity), and not only fails to do so but comes home with a (perhaps unsuitable) new wife. The family patriarch has planted the farm in wheat right up to the front door, and even reprimands his little girl for picking a stalk of it to play with. They are drowning in a product everybody needs but which barely supports them, and on which they are completely dependent. The contrast between an agricultural America far from idyllic and a motorized city whose drudgery for most is at least as bad is redeemed by the awakening of human feelings and re-ordered priorities. Nothing will save these people but love and family.
  • Silent movies aren't my favorite kind by far, but this one has some good moments indeed, starting with the girls, on a train and the main character Mary Duncan as Kate who is very sexy and took the heart of the Minesota's guy so fast, back in farmer the story stays aimless, became a strong drama and predicable, yet the workers's behavior is totally compelled to adjust the story, nobody does like that even in that period where the respect was required in every way, an important thing to be noticed is about the fine restoration if consider the age of movie!!

    Resume:

    First watch: 2018 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 7.25
  • City Girl is a very simple film about a young man who meets and marries a young woman. He takes her back to his family farm and she isn't exactly welcomed with open arms. The story is quite condensed and that makes the romance feel extremely rushed. It doesn't feel right, even if courting before marriage wasn't such a big deal back then. I think to sell some of the stuff that comes later they needed more time to convince the audience that they were truly in love. I still liked their rapport, though and the early scenes were quite charming. The rest of the film, however, is tough to watch. It's not fun watching the things that are done to the City Girl from the title. It's kind of depressing and dark most of the way through the second half of the movie. I was still invested in the plot, so at least they hooked me with the story. The only other problem I had with the film is a personal issue of mine. I find when I watch silent films there's a certain balance of visuals to intertitles that they can't surpass or it will start to bother me. This one was just slightly on the high side for me. There was just too much dialogue we had to read for the amount of scenes we get to watch, it's not out of control, but enough that I noticed (barely.) City Girl is still a solid story that is well-told, just not one I loved.
  • Minnesota country boy Charles Farrell (as Lem) goes to Chicago, to sell the family's wheat harvest. In the hectic city, he meets pretty coffee shop waitress Mary Duncan (as Kate), who longs for the simple life. The attractive pair fall blissfully in love. After marrying Ms. Duncan, Mr. Farrell takes her home to live with his country family. But, father David Torrence (as Tustine) distrusts the "City Girl", and is angry with his son for selling his wheat at an inferior price. A stern patriarch, Mr. Torrence drives a wedge between the happy couple. To make matters worse, Duncan becomes prey for some arriving reapers…

    This is another stunner from director F.W. Murnau ("Sunrise"), who would so tragically die in a car accident (after only one more film). "City Girl" was produced by Mr. Murnau as a "silent" ("Our Daily Bread"); but, Fox Films recalled the movie, and turned it into a "talkie". At the time, Farrell's name was rising to the upper reaches of "Box Office" star lists, but, truth be told, only Charlie Chaplin and Greta Garbo still had the power to draw audiences to a silent movie (and, even that was fading). With re-shoots, a partially talking "City Girl" was seen briefly, and forgotten.

    The unearthed full length silent version was, thankfully, preserved. It is a near-perfect film. Farrell, who many felt deserves some "Best Actor" recognition fro his role in "7th Heaven", outdoes himself. Murnau, photographer Ernest Palmer, set director Harry Oliver are also award-worthy. Although she looks too startlingly glamorous in the country portions, Duncan is hot in the city. No wonder leering Richard Alexander (as Mac) couldn't keep his hands off her. The entire cast performs splendidly, right down to David Rollins giving Duncan lift at work.

    Sequences to re-play (if not the whole movie): Farrell walking the crowded city streets, Duncan in her apartment (where she blows the city dust off her suffocating plant), the couple's ecstatic run through his father's wheat fields, the arrival of grinning Guinn Williams and the reapers, and their harvesting scenes. Murnau's direction of the horse-driven wagons is especially spectacular. The lighting is brilliant throughout.

    ********* City Girl (2/16/30) F.W. Murnau ~ Charles Farrell, Mary Duncan, David Torrence, Richard Alexander
  • Murnau had the knack of taking what looks like a simple relationship between a man and a woman (here a farm boy falling in love with a city girl who is a waitress) and depicting it in such a dramatic, physical, and spiritual fashion that you are spellbound throughout the whole picture. I must confess his early horror films do nothing for me; it is the romantic pictures like Sunrise and City Girl that show his real talents. These films transcend time itself.

    Murnau is not afraid to depict characters who have a spiritual aspect to them....a quality totally lacking in today's pathetic, heathen filmmakers. For instance, Murnau in City Girl actually shows the main character (Charles Farrell) praying over his food in a public diner! When was the last time you saw that in a major motion picture? Refreshing!

    Mary Duncan does well as Kate, the city girl. She had such soulful eyes and such a striking manner. She is totally believable as the woman struggling to survive a tough situation on a family farm run by a madman. Too bad this is the only silent film work of hers that has survived. Charles Farrell shows much depth in his silent film portrayals, much more so than in his early talkies, and City Girl is another fine example of his work.

    If you are a fan of silents or of Murnau's work, don't neglect seeing this gem.
  • City Girl (1930)

    *** 1/2 (out of 4)

    Country boy Lem (Charles Farrell) is sent to Chicago by his father (David Torrence) so that he can sell the family's wheat. The family is depending on getting a good price but once in the city Lem falls for waitress Kate (Mary Duncan) and the two are married. When Lem brings her home she's immediately hated by the father who sees her as nothing but trash and soon lust and envy are going to divide the family. This film has obvious similarities with Murnau's masterpiece SUNRISE and it seems this here takes a small beating simply because it isn't as great. There's no denying that SUNRISE is so much better but at the same time this is an incredibly impressive gem that manages to get just about everything right. The one negative thing is that the ending really doesn't work and there are a few parts where things get a tad bit over dramatic. Outside of those issues I really loved this movie from start to finish and I think it deserves a lot more praise than it gets. For me this entire film is Duncan as she's the heart and soul of the story. The first time we see her she just jumps off the screen and into your heart. I won't spoil how the two meet but the first time we, the viewer, see her is just like the first time Lem does as Murnau really makes us fall in love with her just like Lem does. I was really amazed at how caught up I was in her story but I thought the director did a terrific job at building up her character by telling us very little. We see her unhappiness in this crowded restaurant and we learn everything we need to know about her. The Lem character is a great one as well and the "simple boy from the farm" never gets watered down or made to look stupid. Sure, he's living in fear of his father but I think the film makes the right decision to not play him as some sort of fool. Lem and Kate's relationship is a rather incredibly one as we can see the passion, fire and love between the two. Murnau does a masterful job at painting their relationship and it's one we can really feel. The Torrence character is certainly one of the better villains from this period as you'll be wanting to jump into the film and do the guy as much physical harm as possible. The evilness of this character and the hatred he has will make you want to hate him in return. All three actors are wonderful but there's no question that the film belongs to Duncan. Richard Alexander is strong in his role of a man who tries to steal Kate away and we also get good work by Edith Yorke, Roscoe Ates and Guinn Williams. The visual style of the film is something else I was really impressed with as Murnau really makes the film look like a painting. The scenes in the wheat are filmed in a way where it looks like what Heaven would look like in another film. The glossy look of the scenery really fits the film well and the sequence with Lem and Kate running down the road when they first arrive home is unforgettable. While this certainly isn't the masterpiece SUNRISE is, this is still a classic and one of the better love stories from this era.
  • AAdaSC20 December 2018
    Charles Farrell (Lem) has lived a sheltered life on a Minnesota farm and has been inexplicably tasked with going to the big city - Chicago - to get a good price for the family's wheat crop. His extremely strict father David Torrence has sent him with precise instructions on what price to sell at. His son completely fails on his mission and returns with a wife in the form of waitress Mary Duncan (Kate) whose dream is to get away from city life. Daddy Torrence is not happy.

    This film is silent and also stars George W Bush as one of the farmhands who helps reap the wheat. It's the same dumb expression and he still had it in 1930. The story centres on human relationships between redneck farmboys, a pretty new girl on the scene, a simple farmboy who needs to man up and a mean old man who really needs to change his bully-boy outlook on life. Can things work out?

    It has funny sections, picturesque sequences, dramatic moments and unfortunately a frustrating Charles Farrell. Who prays at a busy diner before eating? NOBODY. The acting is generally good and Duncan's female boss at the café really needed a bigger role. She was funny. The film gives us a slice of social history which is also of interest in the form of farming techniques and city crop markets. Anybody know why we are still eating corned beef?
  • Excellent actors, good music, NO STUPID DIALOGUE and a story I was really interested in. The supporting actors had personality, the bad guy was realistic, for a long time the first movie I really had to see all the way to know the ending (happy end? No? Yes? No?). Perhaps a bit too much "Pathos" in the end, but I didn´t care...
  • This is one of those films that you can just sit back and let wash over you... The plot is simple, as are the characters involved - but that's what makes it effective. "Lem" (Charles Farrell) is a young man sent by his overbearing father to Chicago to sell their annual wheat crop. He frequents a diner where he meets the young waitress "Kate" (Mary Duncan) and the pair are soon an item. Meantime, though, the price of wheat is dropping so he must quickly secure a deal before he and his gal return home to rural Minnesota. His father "Tustine" (David Torrence) is less than impressed with both the deal he got and the wife, and a period of unpleasantness culminates in some deliberate and selfish actions by the father as the harvesting is going on, that could spell ruin for everyone. The camera simply loves Farrell and Duncan - and the accompanying score helps them to convey their love and frustrations expertly. The ending is maybe just a little twee - but it does offer some redemption that illustrates how difficult it could be for a father to show affection for his son, and also of the somewhat trivial roles accorded to women at the time - many of whom were far more competent than their men folks! It is based on Elliott Lester's play 'The Mud Turtle", which like this film, I suspect, doesn't get out much nowadays - but this flows smoothly and effortlessly and really is quite a joy to watch.
  • Not as well known as "Sunrise" but in its own way just as fine, "City Girl" is another Murnau pastoral in which "City Girl" and waitress Mary Duncan moves to the wheatfields of Minnesota as the wife of farmer Charles Farrell, (one of the greatest and least appreciated of silent movie stars), only to find his father taking against her and life down on the farm not as ideal as she thought it would be. It's a film that is said to have influenced Terrence Malick and there are images here as eloquent as any in "Days of Heaven" and its one of the few really good parts Duncan ever had. Although she lived to be ninety-eight she only made 16 films and retired in 1932.

    If the plot is novelettish Murnau's handling of it is anything but. He takes melodramatic material and situations and imbues them with a realism that the American cinema never really seemed to develop for at least a decade or two, aided by the magnificent cinematography of Ernest Palmer and the wonderful performances of the leads. It also proved to be Murnau's penultimate film; he died in a car crash the following year leaving behind a body of work as fine as any in all of cinema.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    For it's time I'm sure The City Girl was a bawdy piece of film work what with all the sexual advances and threats of rape posed by the hired hands. I'm not sure it has lost that quality as I found the hitting of women and the lechery of the men to be quite unsettling in it's reality. The film is simple, so simple it could have been written out on a couple pieces of paper, the dialog is good, the acting fair and the lighting and music exceptional. Heavy makeup on the actors especially Charles Farrell is a bit distracting and takes away from the modernness of the images. Even though this film is from 1930 you can easily relate to the times and characters. It is an enjoyable film and a time machine back to a simpler era but the story is too predictable and a bit contrived.
  • When it comes to silent film directors, FW Murnau is absolutely one of the best and most influential. His lesser work, such as 'The Haunted Castle', is still watchable, and his best work such as 'Faust', 'The Last Laugh' and 'Sunrise' is masterpiece level. He was a truly brilliant director (whose premature tragic death was a big loss) and very interesting and quite consistent, with his films being visually stunning and full of interesting themes and great atmosphere.

    His penultimate film 'City Girl' is not among Murnau's best or one of his milestones, other films of his have a bigger influence in cinema (i.e. 'Sunrise', which this film has been compared to on occasions). It is still a very, very good, and often great, film with so many brilliant things and is a visual and directorial triumph. If the story was stronger as that does bring the film down somewhat (not massively though), 'City Girl' would have been even better as it had all the makings of being a cinematic classic.

    As said, 'City Girl's' weak link is the story, which is very simple, at times barely existent, and some plot points have been used such a lot in film that it felt narratively on the predictable side due to not having many surprises or much new. The ending especially can be seen from quite some distance off and seemed a little neat.

    On the other hand, the story is also very charming and elegant and really liked its restraint. Some of it is very moving too. The characters are interesting and don't come over as caricatures and the conflict has tension, they are also acted with intensity and sincerity without being histrionic. Mary Duncan gives her role a lot of life and pathos in a beautifully understated way and Charles Farrell does show that while slightly too innocent (which is more to do with the role in a way) that he could do good performances outside of his pairings with Janet Gaynor. My favourite performance of the film came from David Torrence, giving his meaty father figure plenty of stern intensity that is smouldering at its best while not overacting.

    The music has a lot of charm and poignancy to it too which was perfect for 'City Girl's' tone. The biggest stars though are the visuals and the direction. Murnau's direction is nothing short of exemplary, Murnau's direction is some of his most accomplished, keeping things moving in a way that is never dull, maintaining a grippingly poignant and restrained atmosphere throughout.

    Even better is the way 'City Girl' looks. Simply put, the film looks amazing still, the use of light and shadow is quite masterful and the settings are sumptuous and not too stagy. Best of all is the cinematography, which is so gorgeously expressive and some of the absolute best of any recent first time viewing.

    Concluding, very, very good indeed. 8.5/10
  • City Girl (1930) : Brief Review -

    Murnau's top class high end drama to keep City Girl's Dignity Alive. Murnau is in different league altogether with any Love-story, affection sort of elements and here's another solid example of it. City Girl is a very early poignant take on City Girl's preassumed bad image by countryside people. Like other Murnau's other Flicks this one also has been framed in dramatic posture and every element is kept is in positive manners. While Sunrise (1927) was about lost husband finding true love of his life, City Girl is about an underestimated husband who learns to fight for his wife. A Chicago waitress falls in love with a Minnesota farmer, and decides to face a life in the country. She wishes to face good days but instead comes across worse days she couldn't have even imagined. A sweet Romance vanishes after couple of misunderstandings and then dignity of the woman comes at stake. She has to choose between her dignity and husband, what does she chooses? Find out all in the film. I am not quite sure about the predictability of the climax which seemed pretty okay as i am seeing it in 2021 but i guess it might have amazing for 1930s. Mary Duncan totally lives the character of the Girl in the film. Watch out for the expression she gives in Cafe scenes and the climax scenes. Farrell and Torrence makes a great pair of repulsive yet loved Son-Father whereas supporting cast in the workers roles is terrific in all scenes. Cinematography is perfect from City towers to countryside farms. City Girl has a good writing and its screenplay too fits in right size with gripping runtime of 98 minutes. Murnau doesn't hit the Masterpiece Level like Sunrise and his German Classics with this one but goes very close to it. Overall, City Girl is another fabulous film in F. W. Murnau's remarkable filmography because even his lowest is better than other directors high level.

    RATING - 7/10*

    By - #samthebestest
  • I liked the acting, the cinematography, you could tell the director knew what he was doing. I just didn't like the story, too many clichés, no twist was unpredictable, If someone gave you just the premise (boy marries girl in the city and move to the country to help his father on the farm) you could probably guess every major plot point of the entire film. Maybe the things in this movie weren't as well-known tropes like they are now, but it kind of made me dislike the movie just seeing how overdone everything in the movie was. Would have given it a higher score otherwise, the story just brought it down.
An error has occured. Please try again.