Nana (1934) User Reviews (10)

Anna

[wes-connors · 5/10 · 29 September 2011]

In 1860s Paris, beautiful escort Anna Sten (as Nana) falls in love with handsome lieutenant Phillips Holmes (as George Muffat). When Mr. Holmes' colonel brother Lionel Atwill (as Andre) finds out Ms. Sten is the mistress of elderly Richard Bennett (as Gaston Greiner), he forbids little brother marry the beautiful Sten, then falls for her himself. This watered-down adaptation of Emile Zola's naughty novel "Nana" was producer Samuel Goldwyn's attempt to create a new Greta Garbo - with a Marlene Dietrich song imitation thrown in for good measure. Alas, lightning did not strike up much action in theater cashiers...

Her MGM contract up, the elusive Garbo had "retired" to Sweden for several months during 1932-1933, creating the gap filled by various attempts to find a "New Garbo". Sten, who had already proved herself an accomplished and versatile actress, comes across as unable to handle the lead role. A good supporting cast, fine photography from Gregg Toland, and capable direction by Dorothy Arzner failed to create anything approaching Garbo or Dietrich. Ironically, Garbo's own "Camille" (1936) would later cover much of the territory attempted in "Nana", with Jessie Ralph (as Zoe) uttering almost identical lines.

***** Nana (2/1/34) Dorothy Arzner ~ Anna Sten, Phillips Holmes, Lionel Atwill, Richard Bennett

Sten's Nana is nasty

[st-shot · 5/10 · 26 October 2011]

This tame version of the Emile Zola novel has excellent production values is lensed by Gregg Toland and features an able supporting cast all negated by the wretched Anna Sten in the lead. A Garbo/Dietrich hybrid with a dreadful grasp of English she more resembles Bela Lugosi in inflection than the other two imports.

Nana is the toast of the Paris theater during the Belle Epoque. With boudoir attributes that match her stage performances she attracts a lot of heavy hitters. She truly falls for a low in status officer but this is complicated by his brother (Lionel Atwill) who at first attempts to break up the two but finds Nana irresistible himself.

Sten's flat affect is beyond bad, her stage presence a travesty. Lionel Atwill, Mae Clarke and Philip Holmes fulfill their end of the bargain ably but there is no getting around the totally lost Ms. Sten. It cries out for Greta or Marlene from its opening moments and given its impressive foundation I found myself annoyed at this botched chance to do the Zola novel justice and the lost opportunity for both actresses to sink their teeth into a role that would have ranked with their best.

Sten was better than the material Goldwyn gave her

[MissSimonetta · 6/10 · 3 April 2024]

Having seen two Anna Sten vehicles during her brief collaboration with Samuel Goldwyn, I've come to the conclusion that Sten's Hollywood sojourn was horribly mishandled. Sten herself is charming, particularly in comedic scenes. She was undeniably beautiful too. She does handle a few dramatic scenes awkwardly, though this could have been from discomfort in the English language.

The big problem is the films themselves. NANA and WE LIVE AGAIN are glossy, tame versions of 19th century novels. NANA in particular has a patchwork script, a case of parts being better than the whole. The best scenes involve Nana and her fellow ladies of the night interacting, or her misadventures in wooing foolish men. The moment the serious love plot rears its head, the movie clomps. Sten is also called upon to do her best Dietrich impression in the film's one musical number and it's okay-- but it's better to be a first rate version of yourself than a second rate Dietrich.

A different side to Anna Sten

[jimjo1216 · 19 September 2013]

Ukrainian-born Anna Sten was brought to Hollywood by Samuel Goldwyn to be the next Greta Garbo, but her career didn't quite pan out that way. I'd seen WE LIVE AGAIN (1934), an Anna Sten vehicle adapted from a Tolstoy epic, and I didn't care much for it. I hadn't heard great things about NANA (1934), Sten's Hollywood debut, and was hesitant to check it out. But NANA's not too bad and it's easy to see Anna Sten's appeal.

NANA is a period piece based on the novel by Emile Zola. Sten plays a Parisian streetwalker who is discovered by a theatrical impresario and becomes a stage success before falling in love with a soldier and running afoul of his protective older brother. Anna Sten does alright in the lead role. She's a beautiful girl, and her hard-boiled performance is much different than her turn in WE LIVE AGAIN. Part Garbo, part Marlene Dietrich, she even talk-sings through a stage number, smoking a cigarette.

Sten has a noticeable accent, like many other foreign imports, but her acting isn't as bad as some people say. Sten's character is a self-confident prostitute, at ease with her place in Paris society. It's a low-energy role. All she's really required to do is effortlessly seduce every man who looks at her, and she seems to pull it off. She's certainly very attractive. The scene where she teases her new admirers in her dressing room has a sexy edge. Perhaps Anna Sten came off as too much of a Dietrich/Garbo stand-in, without a style of her own.

Lionel Atwill plays his usual antagonistic aristocrat, though the forty-eight-year-old Atwill is improbably cast as the older brother to twenty-six-year-old Phillips Holmes, who plays the young soldier who falls in love with Sten. The cast also includes Jessie Ralph as Sten's personal maid, Richard Bennett as the great impresario, and Reginald Owen as his assistant. The film does suffer from a lack of star power, with no Fredric March or Gary Cooper to shoulder some of the weight. Anna Sten gets the spotlight to herself in what is meant to be a star-making role, but her name alone wouldn't be enough to draw an audience.

Mae Clarke, one of my favorite actresses from the 1930s, was a big reason I gave NANA a shot. She plays one of Sten's prostitute buddies (along with Muriel Kirkland). Clarke does a good job, but it's a minor role. Her performances in several early-1930s films are refreshingly naturalistic, but she was eventually reduced to often-uncredited bit parts. Viewers may know Mae Clarke from THE PUBLIC ENEMY (1931) or FRANKENSTEIN (1931), but I'd also recommend her work in WATERLOO BRIDGE (1931), THREE WISE GIRLS (1932), THE MAN WITH TWO FACES (1934), PENGUIN POOL MURDER (1932), and LADY KILLER (1933).

NANA was directed by Dorothy Arzner, the only female director working in Hollywood at the time. Set in 1860s Paris, it's a decent period piece. Good production values, nice costumes, and a tragic romance. Better than I expected, and a pretty good showcase for Goldwyn's exotic new discovery, Anna Sten. Unfortunately audiences in 1934 didn't take to NANA or Sten, and she never achieved stardom.

worth seeing . . . once

[tracyfigueira · 4/10 · 14 November 2008]

This film has gone down in history as one of the great turkeys of all time, and to a certain extent that reputation is justified. Anna Sten, the émigré Russian starlet Samuel Goldwyn tried to build up as the next Garbo, was a beautiful woman and her English diction wasn't as bad as it's made to be. The problem is that there was no way Hollywood in 1934 could do justice to Emile Zola's scathing account of sexual debauchery in Second Empire Paris. The nudity is gone, most of the lovers are gone, the lesbian relationship with Satin (Mae Clarke) is barely hinted at. Nana, as played by Sten, is a far more sympathetic character than she is in the book. She shoots herself rather than rotting to death from smallpox (a euphemism for syphilis?) No mention is made of her illegitimate child or the path of death and destruction she leaves in her wake. The film is an interesting if dated curio, worth watching at least once, but proof that not every film from Hollywood's "Golden Age" is a gem.

Poor Nana (Anna Sten) never stood a chance...

[splurben · 3/10 · 19 January 2022]

When producer Samuel Goldwyn hired Travis Banton (who costumed Marlene Dietrich for Paramount) AND Adrian (who costumed Greta Garbo for MGM) to do the costumes for his new international actress of mystery and glamour Anna Sten, who could have guessed that it would be a recipe for disaster?

This film tries SO HARD to be a Dietrich or Garbo vehicle with that "Lubitsch Touch" but oh my dear sweet Aunt Betsy it doesn't work. The script is rubbish, the titular author Zola is pretty much nowhere other than character names and some situations. There's no Von Sternberg lighting or atmosphere. The Banton costumes come off as a parody of Dietrich which was probably an assassination plot by Banton and Dietrich. Dorothy Arzner's direction was undoubtedly constricted and hampered massively by Goldwyn's constant interference.

And although she tried valiantly, Anna Sten was left with nothing but a mish-mash of hackneyed Hollywood plots with which to try and imbue some vitality. The rest of the cast, including many capable and veteran players, are just along for the ride whilst trying to keep their heads above water.

Poor Miss Sten's Hollywood career was over before it began. Safe to say that "Goldwyn's Folly" as this production was known, would not have ruffled any feathers of international mystery and glamour in 1934.

Boring...and it wasn't all Anna Sten's fault--though much of it was!

[planktonrules · 3/10 · 15 November 2008]

My wife and I just finished watching this movie and throughout much of it, she kept asking me "are you SURE you want to finish this film?!". I have to admit that I thought about turning it off a few times, too, but it never was quite bad enough to merit this--though it sure came close!! In light of the general view that the film was a major debacle when it debuted, I was actually surprised to see one reviewer gave it a 9.

As for the plot and how it differs from the novel by Emile Zola, I'll leave you to read over tracyfigueira's excellent review. I haven't read the book but knew enough about it to realize that the plot was dramatically different from Zola's. One of the reasons is that although they never say it, it's very obvious that Nana was a prostitute and had slept with half of Paris! And her friends were also common prostitutes as well. Yet, Sam Goldwyn insisted that Nana be played like a combination of Marlene Dietrich and the Singing Nun! Oy.

When the tale of this trollop with a heart of gold debuted in 1934, critics howled at the horrible acting of newcomer Anna Sten and the public avoided this bloated epic like the plague. In fact, for years, consensus was that Sten was a horrible actress and her performance convinced me that the people of the 30s were very astute--she was a terrible actress. Her accent was difficult to cut through and her "acting" was amateurish throughout. However, I also feel that to blame the picture's demise squarely on her was unfair. Even if Ms. Sten had been competent (and I remind you she was NOT), the writing was just awful and anyone uttering such claptrap would look ridiculous! Plus, Goldwyn's insistence that Sten be treated like an even more bewitching creature than Dietrich and Garbo was silly and destined to failure--and making Sten look even more ridiculous as she tried in vain to act that alluring. Heck, when Sten sang (if you can call it that), before she even finished this god-awful number, the men in the audience (who had previously never even heard of her) all began behaving like a Tex Avery cartoon wolf! No one is THAT sexy and desirable!! In addition to all this silliness and bad acting, the film also suffers from bad acting by many of the co-stars--particularly Nana's hooker friends. And, to make things worse, the film is also dreadfully dull and derivative--looking like a knockoff of several of Garbo's and Dietrich's films (especially CAMILLE and BLONDE VENUS). See this film if you are curious about Sten--otherwise, avoid it like the plague.

By the way, and I know this will sound VERY catty, but in watching this film I kept asking myself if perhaps Ms. Sten and Mr. Goldwyn have some other vested interest in each other. I know this sounds petty, but his insistence on a huge publicity campaign to create an American career and three failed big budget US films does make you wonder why he brought her to this country to begin with or kept her here after her performance in NANA.

There Was Something About Anna Sten

[felixoscar · 9/10 · 5 April 2003]

Sure, the film is dated, the dialogue sometimes florid, the tone too much copied von Sternberg. But this movie a mega-flop and Anna Sten and her mentor Sam Goldwyn pillaged?

I have seen Nana a few times on TV; coincidentally when first aired on TV (around 1970) and twice since then. Gotta tell you, I think Goldwyn was on to something - Anna is, yes, a bit like Garbo, a bit like Dietrich, but a lot like, well Anna Sten. And her acting far better than she is criticized for (try her 1935 The Wedding Night, very touching, thank you King Vidor).

Too bad she was not afforded more opportunities in the right vehicles (like Marion Davies?).

Anna Sten turns in a realistic, fine performance

[lora64 · 10/10 · 25 September 2011]

This is the first time I've seen Anna Sten in Nana and it's worth every minute of viewing. Of course what comes to mind is the opera La Traviata by Verdi which in turn was based on Alexandre Dumas the younger's novel La Dame aux Camelias, and I daresay the story has been told many times, of ill-fated deception of too many lovers.

Anna, whose spontaneous manner reminded me of Miriam Hopkins' strong style of delivery, is true to life and far more believable than Garbo whose acting came across as stilted. There are traces of Dietrich mannerisms in Anna's facial expressions but her beautiful features are truly awesome, a real beauty that I never tire of seeing.

This is a movie that I can look forward to viewing several times and not get tired of it. Recommended.

Forget Zola and Garbo. Think proto-feminist film by 1st female director starring prettier actress with a light accent.

[Isobelk · 8/10 · 13 May 2014]

Fascinating period piece both in terms of the Setting of the film and when it was made. It's a rather early "talky" made by the only female director of the time. The original director began his career as a French art director and was fired and replaced by Arzner. Maybe he is responsible for the grand production values. Dorothy Arzner had been a film editor and even a cinematographer before becoming the first female member of the Film Directors Guild. She uses some great camera movements and segues that were very innovative for the era.

The music is very good. There is a great use of drums to create and build tension.

I didn't even think of Zola's Nana so it's loose connection didn't bother me. Anna Sten is gorgeous. There are some references to homosexuality between the women. But it's very subtle to modern viewers as required in 1930s when it might have been unheard of to the majority of viewers.

This Nana is quite a feminist for the 1930s. She's gay in the original meaning of the word and refuses to exist in her preordained social class. She is an independent woman who has affairs with different men throughout the picture without necessarily loving them. She gets drunk. She works hard. She parties. What woman today hasn't done that? But in the 1930s? Scandalous! And the men all blame her for their bad choices because she doesn't fall in with them or obey them. One of Nana's lovers forbids her to drink more alcohol and she says, "You what!!??" He has to soft pedal it.

She constantly takes insults and keeps going. The old men in the picture want to ruin her for loving outside her class. She gives it right back to them. She tells one old fart, "You made me? Well I paid you!" Meaning she paid him with her youth, beauty, and sex. And his price was expensive, the wrinkly old dick.

It is a much more sympathetic view of Nana than the self righteous and sexist Zola could have dreamed of. So many men just can't believe that a woman might just enjoy life outside of marrying and having children. Arzner knew a woman could.

I think Sten's accent and acting was criticized heavily when the film first came out because the acting in the silent era was so different and critics weren't used to the new style in talkies. Also, foreign accents were initially not well received. Garbo had been a silent film star and was accepted as a transitional star. Sten didn't have that to carry her into the new medium. Viewed without any bias over Garbo, Sten is very good and in some ways seems to have a more modern style comparable more to Olivia de Haviland. Her eyes are super sexy.