Little Lord Fauntleroy (1936) User Reviews (36)

The vintage adaptation of the famous novel with two sensational boys , Bartholomew and Rooney

[ma-cortes · 7/10 · 16 May 2006]

1880 , Brooklyn , New York , a poor and fatherless boy (Freddie Bartholomew) is living with his mum (Dolores Costello). A sender (Henry Stephenson) communicate them which he turns out to be the only state heir to the earl of Dorincourt (Sir C. Aubrey Smith) . He then leaves his friends (Mickey Rooney and Guy Kibbee) and set out for England as the long-lost heir to his grandpa and a British dukedom . But the grandfather is a grumpy and crusty nobleman and the problems are always cropping up . Then , little Lord Fauntleroy must try to overcome the cold and grouchy lord .

Classic and the best version based on known novel by Frances Burnett with elitist and sincere interpretations from Bartholomew , Aubrey Smith , Rooney , enough to make the creaky ancient tale actually works . Freddie Bartholomew had starred ¨Anna Karenina¨ and ¨David Copperfield¨ but his greatest success resulted out to be this film . Dolores Costello , married to John Barrymore , plays the lovable mummy in an affected and forced acting . Sir C. Aubrey Smith is magnificent as the bitter-grumbler and unsentimental count . Una O'Connor , as always , plays a maid with her ordinary gestures and grimaces . For comic relief , as usual , appears Mickey Rooney giving a hilarious and sympathetic acting . This was originally made in black and white with an excellent cinematography by Charles Rosher but there is also available in computer-colorized version and the musical score was composed by the classical musician Max Steiner . Director John Cromwell worked a lot with the great and powerful producer David O. Selznick and seems largely to have been content to follow his instructions , though he was always loath to allow too much sentimentality as happens on the sometimes heavily relationship between mother-son and grandfather-grandson . Due to the demise of O.Selznick , this movie is now in the public domain . The picture was remade for television in 1980 by Jack Gold with Alec Guinness and Rick Schroder and in 1976 by Paul Annett and 1995 with George Baker . The motion picture was immensely successful in America and around the world , it is actually an authentic and charming classic movie .

An excellent adaptation, a bit too sentimental, but. . . ah well.

[tinman19602003 · 7/10 · 5 May 2006]

John Cromwell gets a lot of credit for this Selznick Studio release. It is only the second time (at that time) the story had been filmed. The first was a poor silent version. Although Cromwell could have developed the story a bit more, it is well cast. Bartholomew is excellent as young Cedrick and Smith is fine as the crusty old Earl who learns to love his grandson, additionally Rooney as Dick the bootblack, and Kibbee as storekeeper Hobbs are also outstanding.

Although heavy with sentimentality, Cromwell has done an excellent job of cutting out all the terrible wordiness of the novel. (Burnett writes as though she is being paid by the word and puts in way to many adjectives.) The story is well told and the scenic effects are good for their time. Unfortunately the film has not aged well and some scenes have darkened with time. Perhaps an enterprising admirer will trouble to restore this film. IF they do, hopefully they will also restore the missing scenes so the film runs its full length.

A discount film hawker (Front Row Video, Canada) has the nerve to sell copies of the film (claiming a running time of 1:42) that are so butchered, that two conversations are cut right in the middle with a change of scene. Digiview Productions who states on the front cover "Sometimes the price we pay is too high" and charges only a dollar for their DVD version, has been caught with their foot in their mouth. They only charge a buck, but even that is too much for the hacked up 92 minute version of the film they sell.

For purists, I urge you to find a complete copy of this well done film. THe only way you can enjoy something is to see all of it.

Great British/American partnership---once again.

[knutsenfam · 7/10 · 23 November 2005]

Two great 1930's child actors, Freddie Bartholomew and Mickey Rooney, play Little Lord Fauntleroy--Cedric Errol, and streetwise American friend Dick Tipton respectively. (Part British Ceddie fights the bullies--and Dick Tipton runs to help...they fight together. A preview of what a lot of Brits & Americans did in WWII a few years after this film!!!)

Also watch for Sir C. Aubrey Smith as the definitive hostile old Lord Dorincourt, who is charmed and warmed by his newly-met half American grandson's unconditional love. Character actor Guy Kibbee also seems made to play staunch anti-aristocrat American Silas Hobbs. If you read the book (free online), the movie fits it well!

Did you know the book LITTLE LORD FAUNTLEROY was an incredible late 19th century "hit"? Some statesmen actually credit this tale of reconciliation between an old Earl and his half American grandson with improving the then-strained 19th century British-American relationship.

Drew Barrymore's grandmother Dolores Costello Barrymore plays Cedric's charming American Mother.

While this film needs a sound and picture cleanup, it is still worth the watch!(TO YOU FILM PEOPLE--LOTS OF PEOPLE LIKE THIS OLD FILM. CAN'T SOMEONE CLEAN UP THE PICTURE & SOUND?)

Good Adaptation With A Very Good Cast

[Snow Leopard · 19 January 2006]

This is a good adaptation of the story of "Little Lord Fauntleroy", with a very good cast that brings the characters to life in a believable and entertaining fashion. Besides telling the enjoyably old-fashioned family story, the movie adds some nice scenes that simply emphasize the relationships among the characters.

This is one of Freddie Bartholomew's best roles, and he seems pretty natural in the part of Fauntleroy. The adult cast features some very good performances. Dolores Costello is a good choice as the gentle 'Dearest', Henry Stephenson is well-cast as the faithful Haversham, and C. Aubrey Smith seems the very embodiment of a bad-tempered Earl.

But perhaps the best performances come from Guy Kibbee and a young Mickey Rooney, as Cedric's American friends. Their camaraderie in their scenes with Bartholomew works particularly well, and they figure in some of the movie's best moments.

The story is just the familiar old tale, with young Cedric leaving his humble but cozy existence in Brooklyn to go to England, where he must contend with his grandfather's coldness towards his mother and with other challenges. But it's the kind of story that's easy to watch over again when it is told the right way.

Old-fashioned, quaint and mushy - but it works.

[BadWebDiver · 7/10 · 9 January 2004]

This is an example of the type of film where I reckon all the characters act like they know they're in a famous novel. The style and delivery is VERY self-conscious and prosaic, with everyone declaiming their lines in a very "noble" fashion (sort of like the "traditional" delivery of Shakespeare).

C Aubrey Smith is by far the most interesting performer in this story, his irascible nature adding some much-needed bite to the movie. Mickey Rooney is also very memorable, showing once again he was a very dynamic and versatile child actor, handling comic and dramatic scenes very well - even in the same film. The mark of a true consummate performer.

I would rank him as a definite child prodigy. (You should also check him out in YOUNG TOM EDISON for another example of this)

I actually think the 80s tele-movie with Ricky Shroder and Alec Guiness worked slightly better than this version does; the characters are a lot more casual in their delivery, and the story flows better. But this is a pretty good version on its own terms any rate.

Excellent Adaptation of Childhood Classic

[Ron Oliver · 10/10 · 8 April 2000]

The Earl of Dorincourt, lonely in his great castle, has grown old. Now, with the death of both of his sons, he sends for his only grandchild to be with him. This is an innocent boy living in New York City with his American mother. Sweet-tempered and beloved, the earnest young child knows nothing of the crusty, fierce old lord in England, or of the wonderful changes about to happen in his own life, now that he is LITTLE LORD FAUNTLEROY.

This is David O. Selznick's wonderful & lavish retelling of the classic children's story by Frances Hodgson Burnett. Much effort was put into getting the details just right. Sentimental? Yes, but honest sentiment, with emotions straight from the heart.

Freddie Bartholomew & marvelous Sir C. Aubrey Smith are picture perfect in their roles as young Fauntleroy & his grandfather. There may never be a finer male child actor than Master Bartholomew and Sir C. was the epitome of the English aristocratic tradition. Two champion scene-stealers, they work together beautifully.

The rest of the cast is both extensive & uniformly excellent: Dolores Costello Barrymore, Henry Stephenson, Guy Kibbee, Jessie Ralph, Una O'Connor, Constance Collier, E. E. Clive, Lionel Belmore, Eily Maylon & Mickey Rooney. Film mavens will spot uncredited appearances by Mary Gordon as a churchgoing villager & Leonard Kibrick as one of Fauntleroy's Brooklyn tormentors.

Sir Hugh Walpole, the celebrated English novelist, wrote the screen adaptation.

An honor to the name

[nickenchuggets · 7/10 · 20 August 2022]

I have to say I typically don't like movies like this because the main characters tend to annoy me with how steeped in royal and aristocratic culture they are. After watching this, my opinion hasn't really changed since the protagonist of this film is a 9 year old boy who is somehow able to speak more eloquently than most modern day adults. I realize people back in this time period were probably more studious and cared more about sounding sophisticated, but not many of the other characters here mirror the boy's behavior. Anyway, this movie is about a young kid named Cedric played by the acclaimed child actor Freddie Bartholomew, and his life in late 19th century New York City after his father dies. Cedric is actually half English genetically, but was born in America. His British grandfather, whom he meets later on, cut relations with his son for marrying an american woman. Cedric, or Ceddie as he is known, is brought to england following a visit from one of the Earl of Dorincourt's associates. Ceddie meets the Earl (C Aubrey Smith), who actually turns out to be his grandpa. Because the Earl has no more living sons left, Ceddie is next in line to claim the title of Lord Fauntleroy, but his mother isn't permitted to stay in his grandfather's estate. The Earl keeps insisting that Ceddie is english because his father was english, but Ceddie says he's american because he was born there, frustrating his grandfather. Ceddie is eventually able to win the gratitude of the Earl by showing everyone how well mannered and aristocratic he is, leading everyone to think he's indeed worthy of his new title. Unfortunately, Ceddie's decadent lifestyle is to be short lived. Someone tells the Earl that a brat named Tom is the real heir to the title of Lord Fauntleroy, since Tom's mother was the spouse of the Earl's oldest son. Extremely disappointed, Ceddie's grandfather travels to meet with Minna, the american girl who makes this claim, and finds that both her and her son are terrible human beings. They have barely any manners and Tom doesn't look like someone who deserves the title of Lord at all. He's slovenly and doesn't even say hello to his grandfather when he arrives. Back in america, Ceddie's friend Dick (Mickey Rooney), a shoeshine boy, finds Minna's photo in a newspaper and travels to england with his brother Ben, who is Minna's actual husband. After Minna's deceit is exposed, Ceddie is allowed to be Lord Fauntleroy after all, and his entire family is allowed to live in the Earl's castle. Like I said earlier, the main problem I have with this movie is the behavior of the main character featured. There's nothing really wrong with the movie itself, it just irritates me for some reason when I see such young characters in such high societal positions. It's only natural they got Freddie to play this character, since even as a child actor, he's able to sound classy in most films he's been in (probably because he was british). It's also strange how this is only the second film I've watched with him in it (the first being The Devil Is a Sissy), and both these productions have another character played by Mickey Rooney who acts as a friend to Freddie. Overall, I felt most areas of this movie were lacking. Nothing really exciting happens throughout its entire runtime, since it's strictly focused on Ceddie's rise to prominence in british society, having his prestige threatened, and then discovering he's Lord Fauntleroy after all. The movie had a lot of potential, but didn't really know what to do with it. Just weird to think the person behind this was also responsible for Gone With the Wind.

Exquisite!

[shneur · 10/10 · 1 April 2006]

They just don't make 'em like this anymore. You can take all your Culkins and Woods and Osments and roll them into one, and they still couldn't shine the shoes of Freddie Bartholemew (as Mickey Rooney does in this film). The difference, I believe, is that these contemporary performers think of themselves as CHILD actors, where Bartholemew and his contemporary Shirley Temple thought of themselves as ACTORS -- just as Rooney's character thought of himself as a BUSINESSMAN. The effect is palpable: you just can't fake being a real person. This of course is the familiar story of an American boy in the 1880's who learns he is the heir to an English earl and must go live with the old bloke, who parenthetically hates his mother, in an old castle. Needless to say, it is the earl who is transformed by the strength and purity of the boy's character, and not the intended reverse. Every scene and every line in this film is perfect, and if it is a "period piece," then I say we'd be so much better off if we could return to that "period."

LITTLE LORD FAUNTLEROY (John Cromwell, 1936) **1/2

[Bunuel1976 · 6/10 · 22 December 2007]

I was familiar with the well-regarded 1980 made-for-TV remake with Alec Guinness and Ricky Schroder of this children's classic. I wasn't expecting this much earlier version to be inferior – especially given that it was a David O. Selznick production – but, as a matter of fact, I think it was just that!

The cast is typically well-chosen – Freddie Bartholomew, C. Aubrey Smith, Dolores Costello, Guy Kibbee, Mickey Rooney, Una O'Connor – but the film as a whole fails to rise to the level of contemporary Selznick titles in a similar vein, like David COPPERFIELD (1935) and THE ADVENTURES OF TOM SAWYER (1938). Bartolomew was the top male child actor of his time (before he was superseded by co-star Rooney!) in such contemporary film adaptations of children's classics as the afore-mentioned David COPPERFIELD, CAPTAINS COURAGEOUS (1937), KIDNAPPED (1938), SWISS FAMILY ROBINSON (1940) and TOM BROWN'S SCHOOLDAYS (1940).

The main problem here is that the story of a young New Yorker at the turn of the century who finds himself living with his aristocratic (and tyrannical) English grandfather – where his position as heir to the title is questioned by another child, subsequently exposed as an impostor – just isn't all that interesting, and frankly quite corny (especially Freddie's penchant for constantly calling his mother "Dearest" and the way the English-hating Kibbee eventually learns to tolerate them). Even so, I would still be interested in catching the Silent 1921 version with Mary Pickford playing both mother and child!

Ultimately, producer Selznick, director Cromwell and actor C. Aubrey Smith would, thankfully, fare much better on their next collaboration – the definitive screen version of another classic story, THE PRISONER OF ZENDA (1937; with which I intend to re-acquaint myself in the coming days).

A priceless Gem...

[[e-mail] · 10/10 · 3 May 2008]

This "GEM" of a film should be digitally remastered to preserve its cinematic integrity. The audio seems a bit "washed" and scratchy and some video portions skip and flutter a bit. This is a shame considering the quality of this fine production. Freddie Bartholomew is precious in this role and was a fine actor in his own right. There is an immediate chemistry generated between him and C. Aubrey Smith. From the outset there was no clash of generations, in fact quite the contrary, they got along swimmingly! It's just too bad that the Earl shunned Dearest right off, but I guess living alone and being lonely would take its toll on anyone, especially since his son married against his wishes. In any event, there should be more movies with actors of this caliber, especially nowadays when the world could really use a great "G" rated film without all the animation and special effects. This should be required reading in schools, if for nothing else, for the lesson in humility. GREAT FILM!!!

The evergreen classic tale is done well by the king of human dramas, John Cromwell.

[SAMTHEBESTEST · 7/10 · 11 December 2022]

Little Lord Fauntleroy (1936) : Brief Review -

The evergreen classic tale is done well by the king of human dramas, John Cromwell. I absolutely love and adore Cromwell for exploring the human drama genre in the 1930s in its most positive form. He made films like "Of Human Bondage" (1934), "The Prisoner of Zenda" (1936), and "In Name Only" (1939) when Hollywood was shifting gears from one to another. Hollywood was upgrading in every genre, from musicals to rom-coms, screwball comedies, film noir, biopics, adventure films, and children's films. Cromwell, too, made films in different genres, but his most acclaimed and successful films were in the drama genre, especially human dramas that carried people's goodwill to teach you something pleasantly positive. Little Lord Fauntleroy was in a similar zone to some of the contemporary classics that featured a child in the starring role and had nothing but good things to say. Here we see a handsome, smart, and kind 9-year-old boy teaching his grandfather to be good. That's too much for a family film, man. You instantly fall in love with the story, while emotions follow blindly. The comedy isn't great, as it shouldn't be, but it's adequate. I kind of have two opinions on the American vs. British arguments. Was it slightly over-propagandised? Or was it an attempt to make things better between these two nations and what they think about each other? Freddie Bartholomew was a "little master" of cinema in those 10 years of his life. C. Aubrey Smith, Guy Kibbee, Henry Stephenson Mickey Rooney and Dolores C. Barrymore are superb in their nicely written roles. Frances Hodgson Burnett's evergreen classic tale is justified by John Cromwell's steady direction, which amounts to a heartwarming experience.

RATING - 7.5/10*

By - #samthebestest.

Much better than I expected.

[Space_Mafune · 8/10 · 6 March 2008]

A nine year old Brooklyn boy nicknamed "Ceddie" (Freddie Bartholomew), beloved by all who know him due to his kindly nature, finds himself in for a most unexpected change of lifestyle when he learns he's to be heir to the estate of his grandfather (C. Aubrey Smith), a British Earl and has to move in with him. A bigger challenge for the boy to overcome though is to bring down the barrier between his stubborn, set in his ways grandfather and Ceddie's mother "Dearest" (Dolores Costello), who the Earl resents his son marrying as she's an American.

This one really grabs you by the heartstrings and doesn't let up. Freddie Bartholomew is simply wonderful as "Ceddie", wonderfully capturing his character and winning over the viewing audience's hearts in fairly short time, no easy feat for a child star. C. Aubrey Smith too is just marvelous as the crotchety old grandfather who finds his stubborn, hard-hearted, icy exterior being worn away just by being in the presence of such a terrific young lad who loves him unconditionally. Dolores Costello too was nicely cast and delivers the goods when she's called upon to do so. It's the likable performances given by these stars that make this a real winner in that we're truly made to care about these characters and what happens to them.

Unless you see,remember me.

[ulicknormanowen · 7/10 · 14 December 2020]

This is a perfect choice for the family .I have a tendency to prefer this black and white version to the color 1980 remake ,except for Alec Guiness -Aubrey Smith overplays- ; more time is given to the times in NYC and to mister Hobbs ( a colorful Guy Kibbee).

Three child actors , one of whom is the lead: Freddy Bartholomew is extremely cute ,his character ,some kind of male Pollyanna , wins the neighborhood -and the audience- over ; you should hear him call his outcast mom "dearest" ;Dolorès Costello is the mom every child should have ,playing her part with an infinite tenderness and delicacy ; Mickey Rooney is well cast as the Brooklyn brat ;and Jackie Seal does quite well in a thankless part.

Some scenes such as the commoners bowing down as their masters enter the Church where the privileged have their place of honor might seem old hat for today's audience.But it works, for the "from rags -not so much ,by the way - to riches " story of this adorable boy is a fable, and his coming means the redemption of a grumpy snob fogey who discovers ,much to his surprise ,that he can bring sweet relief to his fellow men.

Not For The Tough Minded.

[rmax304823 · 5/10 · 25 April 2012]

The book by Frances Hodgson Burnett was published in the 1880s and carried a simple message: humanitarianism is better than arrogance. This is William James' distinction between the tough minded and the tender minded. I must be one of the former because I found it a nonpareil of sentimental and inelegant pap. Pardon me while I light an expensive cigar and stomp the cat.

Sheesh, how triumph follows tragedy and vice versa. Freddy Bartholomew is a nine-year-old boy living in genteel poverty with his loving mother ("Dearest") in a crummy neighborhood in Brooklyn. But not the real Brooklyn of the 1880s. This is a fairyland Brooklyn where there is no garbage or horse manure on the streets, and where Freddy's pal, Mickey Rooney, only betrays his lack of breeding by saying "erl" instead of "oil" and never busts Freddy in the snot locker. Freddy loves his pals, who include the greengrocer, and everybody loves Freddy, just as love loves to love love.

I almost burst into sobs when a lawyer arrives from England and informs Freddy that, since he is the only surviving grandson of the Earl of Dorincourt, he's invited to come to England, join his grandfather in the family mansion, and be inculcated into the aristoi. The present Earl is a bilious and bushy old man who knows no pity except for himself. He hates Freddy's mother and she must live elsewhere, not in the mansion. He treats his tenant farmers the way they treat their dirt.

Freddy, though, is a winsome little lad, naive and generous. To a fault, one might say. And before you know it, Freddy has the crotchety old curmudgeon learning how to be generous and kind -- in an old fashioned way, of course. He's not going to give the family silverware to the poor. He's just not going to berate the servants quite as much.

Then tragedy strikes, and just when it seems things are going so well. Another woman shows up with a lollipop-sucking son who is older than Freddy, and SHE claims to be the first wife of the son of the current Earl. And, believe me, this babe is a real wasp. She laughs and taunts the white-haired old man who has grown to love Freddy, just as everyone else loves Freddy.

Do things turn out all right? Is there a happy ending? Doesn't it prompt you to weep when you hear "Auld Lang Syne" played adagio? On a solo violin? Well, Freddy Bartholomew is unquestionably cute in appearance, speech, and demeanor although, to be sure, a little fist fight in the schoolyard might have done him a power of good. Actually, the illustrations in Hodgson's book started a sartorial fad and kids began to dress like Little Lord Fauntleroy in outfits that resembled little sailor suits with lace collars. The fad lasted for years. I believe there's a photo of young Ernest Hemingway floating around out there somewhere in the ether.

The character of Little Lord Fauntleroy is winning, precisely because it's so improbable. The whole movie is as fantastic as The Wizard of Oz. C. Aubrey Smith is great as the grumbling old Earl, only reluctantly won over by his new grandson. Dolores Costello as "Dearest" always looks as if she's wearing a brave smile to keep from breaking into sobs of some sort, grief or gratitude -- it doesn't matter.

Like so much sentimental material it has its charm. But that's about all it has, sentiment and charm. There's not a laugh in it, and there's no edginess to it. We know at once that the mistaken people will realize their errors, that the bad people will be punished or thwarted, and that the good people will be rewarded. A bit of edge might not have hurt. Have Freddy sneak a few puffs on a corn silk cigarette or something.

Opinion of the current condition of a Selznick classic

[Rlgarstjr · 27 July 2007]

This altogether lovely, exquisite period piece represents Hollywood filming at its height, no doubt. But what almost destroys its timelessness is the terribly bad condition of the film, reportedly taken from a television showing some years ago, complete with some of the worst damage I have ever seen in an old Hollywood classic. The memory of David O. Selznick deserves better than this shoddy monument to his great vision of the Burnett book. It is simply unforgivable that various "discount" houses continue to offer this and so many other dreadful copies of great films to a gullible and unsuspecting public. The complete restoration of this film is LONG overdue. And the various slashing of scenery, dialogue, for whatever greedy reason, is appalling, just appalling. After having seen so very many films on VHS and now DVD over many years, I submit that this is the most heartbreaking kind of butchery of a great, noble effort of any of the great directors and producers in the long history of American filming. Please, won't someone - the AFI, TCM, restoration companies, ANYONE - step up and lovingly bring this lovingly created film back into the sunshine of clarity, wholeness and beauty???!!! I have little faith in our rapidly decaying culture as we enter the new century, especially when such travesties occur. Once again, there is absolutely NO valid, logical excuse for this. Sorry for popping off so much, but I have watched it all too many times before. To use an offensive word appropriate for my feelings - it's bullshit...

Good Kid's Yarn - Little Lord Fauntleroy

[arthur_tafero · 7/10 · 24 March 2022]

Freddie Bartholomew had magnificent success as a child actor, but was never able to cash in on his fame as an adult actor. With a plot similar to Citizen Kane made a few years later, a poor young boy is taken by his very rich uncle and made into a swell. We come face to face with the adage "money can't buy you happiness" . Really? Where the hell is my rich uncle; I would be very glad to run off with him. Good viewing.

Little Lord Fauntleroy 1936 Edition

[Kathey-728-867550 · 10/10 · 2 May 2010]

My sister and I just finished watching the movie again. It is one of our favorites.

Not only do I give it a #10 rating - I also give a rating to infinity.

I grew up on the 'edge' of earlier, more sane days of our country and world - at least the first few years were more sane, even though it was after WWII.

I saw enough of the kind of family life that Cedric had with his Mom, and the love and kindness shown, to gratefully remember it. My Mom continued to show me and my siblings, and others, the same kind of love and caring that Ced's mother showed him and others, with such love, kindness, and gentleness, this present world knows little, if anything, about - and today's world is really missing a lot.

All generations has it's good and bad sides, and good and bad people. The kind of morals and love which this movie showed, shows what the majority of society believed and lived, which made life more sane, not perfectly so, but more so. What today's world is missing out on.

" Freddie Bartholomew Excels In His Best Role "

[PamelaShort · 10/10 · 29 September 2013]

If you would like to watch the most humblest, kindest, generous child ever on screen, then this 1936 adaption of the classic " Little Lord Fauntleroy " is perfect for you. Freddie Bartholomew is absolutely irresistible as the impeccably polite Cedric, a role that seems tailored made just for him. C. Aubrey Smith's performance is strong and convincing, and even a little scene stealing as the cantankerous grandfather, The Earl Of Dorincourt. Dolores Costello is lovely playing the gentle Dearest. Even the Lord's brusque Great Dane gives in to the charms of "Ceddie." Add Mickey Rooney, Guy Kibbee, along with a host of superb supporting actors all perfectly portraying their parts and the results are a first class, outstanding film of a classic story. A very delightful and heartwarming picture for all ages to enjoy. A must see for your list of early classic movies.

Charming precious film of the 30's

[Atreyu_II · 9/10 · 11 December 2011]

This film, although almost unbelievably dated, is a work of fine quality and utterly charming. It certainly is something special when it comes to the plot.

This is the story of a little boy with a normal life who could have never imagined he was a heir of the title Earl of Dorincourt. Dutty calls this boy. Make no mistake: this is an endearing story. This fine-mannered curly-haired little lord captivates the Earl so much that the austere old man has a change of heart. He truly cares for this boy in a way he never though he could care about a child.

Freddie Bartholomew's special acting as the Little Lord Fauntleroy is simply divine. Dolores Costello too is divine as "Dearest". As for C. Aubrey Smith, his acting as the old Earl is captivating. Mickey Rooney is hilarious as Dick Tipton.

This should definitely be on Top 250.

A very good film, but a little aged, of course

[pschwens · 9/10 · 11 August 2008]

Just a brief comment for now, of all the versions that I watched of Little lord Fauntleroy filmatisations, this one in my opinion features the best fitting actors if you compare with the book. And shining gloriously at the top is Sir C. Aubrey Smith (the old Earl - Cedric's grandfather). No other actor that I have seen so far comes closer to portraying the old Earl as gruff and cantankerous as he comes across in the beginning of the book. A slight minus is the low technical quality of the film, but being made in 1936 it is not bad all things considered. I might add that this was the first filmatisation that I watched and thus my opinion might be a little biased but I think that this film is still on the top shelf in terms of overall quality, a true classic. Don't miss it if you have the opportunity to watch it.

LITTLE Lord Fauntleroy is SEVEN years old, not 12.

[andylittle-12045 · 1/10 · 10 October 2021]

Instead of finding a suitable 7-year-old to play Cedric, they saw fit to shoehorn 12-year-old Freddie Bartholomew into the role of 7-year-old Cedric. Realizing that he'd never pass for 7, they further saw fit to corrupt Frances Hodgson Burnett's story by changing the protagonist from a 7-year-old who appears to be seven, to a "nine"-year-old who you think is 11 or 12 except that they keep saying he's nine.

The dialogue, almost all of which is taken verbatim from Burnett's work, except for substituting the word "seven" with the word "nine", was written with a a seven-year-old in mind. Cedric's words are just not nearly as significant coming from a "nine"-year-old. And what's endearing for a seven-year-old makes a nine-year-old (especially one who looks 11) a fool or a mama's boy.

And the shoehorn wielders recognized this, but, instead of casting someone age-appropriate, they decided to dig themselves deeper by concocting a scene in which Cedric is accused of being a sissy, on the audience's behalf, and gets into a fight to show his mettle. BUT the whole scene is out of character for Cedric. Cedric is kind to everyone and EVERYONE in his neighborhood loves him. The character that Ms. Burnett describes would NOT have refused to allow any of the other boys to ride on the rear step of his bicycle -- not to mention that his kind widowed mother would never have splurged on a luxury item like a bicycle when she knew Bridget and Michael were in such dire straits.

Frances Hodgson Burnett took great care to ensure that the reader of her story be keenly aware that "Cedric was between seven and eight years old", stating his age as "seven" no less than TEN TIMES during the course of her story -- eleven times, if you count it ending on what she explicitly states is his EIGHTH birthday.

Why? Because, in order for the story to work, Cedric has to be naively trusting and everybody has to find it endearing. And if he's seven -- and appears to be seven -- that's still endearing. But if he looked older, he'd be thought a fool.

That's why in Burnett's 1886 stage production of the story, Cedric is played by SEVEN-year-old Elsie Leslie instead of an older boy (making for a very pretty boy, but not a fool).

That said, almost all of the dialogue is verbatim from Burnett's story and it WOULD HAVE BEEN a really nice picture, if Freddie Bartholomew had been passable for seven and if the every occurrence of the word "seven" had not been replaced with "nine".

Shameless but expert heartwarmer

[rfkeser · 28 November 1999]

Break out the insulin! This antique heartwarmer, awash in tears and goodness, is risibly sentimental, but David Selznick made it an expert entertainment as well. Plucky Freddie Bartholomew is just about irresistible as the Brooklyn boy who becomes an earl. Melting hearts left and right, he wins over his crusty grandfather, becomes a philanthropist in a sailor suit, and fights the local toughs to prove he is NOT a sissy! C.Aubrey Smith seemed born to play the venerable old gentleman, although he relies a bit too much on acting with his monocle. Mickey Rooney stands out as the loyal Brooklyn shoeshine boy. This is the film to watch if you've never actually heard anyone say, "Cheezit, the cops!"

A thoroughly enjoyable classic.

[planktonrules · 9/10 · 31 December 2010]

"Little Lord Fauntleroy" is a tale about a lonely but extremely gruff old English Lord discovering that his estranged grandson in America is a wonderful child. It also includes the boy teaching the man humility and gentleness along the way.

This is the third version of this story that I have seen and the second one I've seen recently. While I am sure there are other versions of this classic tale out there as well, I can't imagine any of them being better than this lovely 1936 version.

Even with the ridiculous casting of the very English-sounding Freddie Bartholomew in the lead (he's supposed to be an American), the film is just wonderful. C. Aubry Smith is delightful as Bartholomew's gruff grandfather, but everyone else in the film also seemed so well-cast. This, combined with great sets, direction and the full David O. Selznick touch make this a terrific film for all ages. One not to be missed.

Worldwide current interest in FAUNTLEROY! Do a TECH CLEANUP!

[movie-viking · 8/10 · 13 May 2008]

The above reviewers and this site summarize this great retelling of the still-read Little Lord Fauntleroy book. So I won't summarize, but just briefly add my cheers & jeers.

Why does this tale (awash in sentimentality in Francis Hodgson's book of the same name) - yet LIVE ON? Anime and even a Russian version are recent. It's still a great tale!

The 1936 LITTLE LORD FAUNTLEROY movie is basically like the 1930's movie HEIDI in one key way...i.e. the GRANDFATHER connection:

A prodigal people-hating even life-hating old grandfather is brought back to the human race and to his God - by the love of a kind and good grandchild.

In this great (but technically damaged) David O. SELZNICK quality family film, ....The old prodigal GRANDFATHER (the great Sir C. Aubrey Smith as the Earl) is brought back to the human race by his kind and good grandchild Cedric Errol (Freddie Bartholomew, the top male 1930's child star).

************** Wade thru the second-rate copy of this movie ...and hope that - the studio does a quality restoration of this great film.

NOTE: the current worldwide interest in LITTLE LORD FAUNTLEROY should make it worth the studio's while to issue a QUALITY restored edition of 1936 LITTLE LORD FAUNTLEROY. Just make sure to dub it in Russian, Japanese and many other languages!

Freddie is such a doll

[HotToastyRag · 10/10 · 3 November 2019]

Freddie Bartholomew is such a doll! It sure is a head-scratcher why he never received a Juvenile Oscar, but here at the Rag, we were proud to give him two Juvenile Rags in 1935 and 1936. With his adorable mannerisms and sweet innocent style of speech, he was perfectly cast in Little Lord Fauntleroy, a delightful classic.

Freddie lives with his mother Dolores Costello in a poor area of New York City. He has poor friends, Mickey Rooney, Jessie Ralph, and Guy Kibbee, but when he learns he's the heir to Earl C. Aubrey Smith, he's swept away to England and to a new world. There are so many sweet scenes in this movie, it's hard to pick one to describe, but one of my favorites is immediately following the news of his good fortune. He asks his benefactor, Henry Stephenson, for a small sum of money before he leaves America, and rather than spend it on himself, he buys each of his friends a present to remember him by. Each present is thoughtful, and his goodbye scenes with Mickey, Jessie, and Guy are very touching.

In England, he's acquainted with his grandfather, the gruff C. Aubrey, while his mother is banished to a separate cottage. Freddie tries to adjust to his new family member, as well as his new responsibilities as an heir, but he misses his mother terribly. Yes, you'll be able to see several tearful, sweet scenes between the little lord and "Dearest". Do you think he'll be able to soften C. Aubrey and mend the old family feud? You'll have to watch one of his cutest movies to find out. He's such a doll; if you've never seen him in a movie, you'll fall in love with him after this one. For your next movie night, rent David Copperfield!