User Reviews (65)

Add a Review

  • It's love at first sight for Peter (James Stewart) when he spots Francey (Ginger Rogers) in a dance hall in "Vivacious Lady," a 1938 comedy also starring Charles Coburn, Beulah Bondi and James Ellison. Stewart is a college professor, and the son of the university president. He's engaged to a drab young woman from a very good family. When he goes to a dance hall to get his cousin Keith (Ellison) so they make their train, he sees Ginger, whom his cousin is also attracted to. By the next day, Stewart and Rogers are married and on their way back to the college town to face the family.

    However, facing the family isn't too easy. Peter's domineering father keeps ordering him around, his mother keeps getting faint from a weak heart whenever there's a conflict...and somehow, no one knows that Francey and Peter are married and think she's dating Keith. Then, in order to get her into the prom, they have to say she's a botany student. One of the best scenes occurs at the prom, when Francey and Peter's fiancé get into a horrific catfight outside of the dance just as Peter brings his father out in another attempt to announce he's married.

    But the best scene takes place in the room Francey has rented. She has a temperamental Murphy bed, and Stewart does everything he can to bring it down - banging doors, drawers, stomping, hoping it will fall.

    Stewart is delightful as a young man who has to decide on priorities, and Rogers is a great match for him. She is incredibly beautiful in this movie. Handsome James Ellison gives a wonderful performance as cousin Keith, and Coburn and Bondi are perfect as the parents.

    A light movie, some great scenes, fantastic stars glowing with youth - you can't ask for more.
  • This is a fun,enjoyable comedy starring two screen legends in their early prime.Ginger Rogers and James Stewart are fine in the leads,but are given a run for the money in the acting department by Charles Coburn and Beulah Bondi.As Stewart's parents they almost steal the show. James Ellison,who I've only seen in De Mille's "The Plainsman" (1936), is serviceable as the second-lead who loses the girl.There's one big highlight in this movie that stands out: The cat fight with Rogers and sparring partner Frances Mercer. It's a hilarious moment.George Stevens keeps the movie bright and funny. If you ever catch this little gem you won't be disappointed.
  • I came across this movie on AMC a couple of weeks ago, and had never seen it before. I am a fan of James Stewart, and was surprised to see him opposite Ginger Rogers......The two worked great together! This movie had some great lines and some very funny scenes. Willie Best, who plays the train cabin steward is very funny. Jimmy is a college professor who marry's a show girl. On his arrival home he has to get the nerve up to tell his parents about his marriage, especially his father. His father is the very staunch President of the University where Jimmy teaches, and is very hung up on appearances and the reputation of his name and family. The interaction between Ginger and Jimmy's old girl friend are quit good as is that of Jimmy's mom and Ginger. I would recommend this movie to anyone.
  • On a rare showing on TCM, I fell in love with this movie! A wonderful pairing of the fiery Rogers and a timid Stewart, made the chemistry between the two believable.

    On a trip to the city, Stewart meets, falls for, and marries Rogers only later realizing his staunch and rigid father would never approve. Taking her back to his small town, Stewart places her in a home for unmarried girls, until he can break the news to his father that he married a showgirl.

    I loved the setting of this movie, and being in black and white only enhanced the scenes. If you liked "The Philadelphia Story" you'll love this! A classic boy-meets-girl, story with delightful humor and a believable romance...
  • The picture focuses a ingenuous , mild-mannered teacher (James Stewart) , he goes N.Y.City and he meets a beautiful chorus girl (Ginger Rogers) from Broadway . But the problems are always cropping up when he must tell their marriage to the conservative parents (Charles Coburn , Belulah Bondi) and his former bride .

    The picture displays screwball comedy , romance , jokes , giggles and lots of amusement . The film highlights are : the struggle between the fiancée and wife in public presence , a drunk Stewart explaining the lesson and the room family dancing in the face of Charles Coburn . However , being eventually hampered by racist stereotypes on the black people characterizations (the two black servants). James Stewart and Ginger Rogers are awesome , both of whom are top-notch comedy actors . Stewart is a phenomenal comedian as he proved in : ¨It's a wonderful life¨ , ¨Shop Around of corner¨ and ¨Philadelpia story¨ . Ginger Rogers is number one as the best dancer actress (though here she only carries out one dance) ; besides , being a riveting comedian and she won an Academy Award for her portrayal in ¨Kitty Foyle : Natural history of a woman¨ . The support cast is first range : Charles Coburn , James Ellison , Jack Carson and Belulah Bondi , this is one of five times that she portrayed James Stewart's mother . And Hattie McDaniel , she is a number of ways , superior to most of the white folks surrounding her , she was the first African-American to win an Oscar (Gone with the wind). The motion picture was magnificently directed by George Stevens who obtained two Oscars and directed excellent movies (Shane , Giant , Gunga Din , A place in the sun). The picture will appeal to sparkling romantic comedy enthusiasts and Stewart , Rogers fans .
  • This film is a joy from beginning to end! It's filled with many great comedic moments: Stewart getting drunk in the classroom, Roger's & Stewart's fiancee fighting in the garden (I read in Ginger's autobiography that she was wearing hockey shin guards when she was kicked!), when Ginger and her mother-in-law are dancing, and the latter's husband comes in (!).

    The only "exasperating" part is Stewart's character's cowardice to tell his parents that he's married; but, without it, there wouldn't be any film!

    The only Rogers film I personally like better than this film (and, only slightly) is "Bachelor Mother". But, SEE THIS!

    Norm
  • Warning: Spoilers
    After having a bad week I decided to try get back into movie viewing. Taking a look at BBC iPlayer,I found a sweet-sounding RKO title about to leave the site,which led to me meeting the vivacious lady.

    The plot:

    Going to pick up his partying cousin Keith, botany professor Peter Morgan, Jr. catches a glimpse of nightclub dancer Francey. After knowing each other for just one day,the couple get married. Returning to his upper-class family home,Peter finds Francey to receive a less than warm reception.

    View on the film:

    Gliding across the screen, Ginger Rogers gives a bubbly performance as Francey,who is given a smooth Screwball Comedy sass in the snappy dialogue by Rogers. Causing months of delay just four days into shooting, (and Donald Crisp and Fay Bainter being replaced by the very good Charles Coburn and Beulah Bondi.) James Stewart (who got the role thanks to his girlfriend Rogers) gives a breezy performance as Peter Morgan,with Stewart's real-life romance with Rogers coming across in the comedic playful interplay between the couple.

    Encouraging the care-free atmosphere, director George Stevens & cinematographer Robert De Grasse keep things stylishly glossy,with elegant whip-pans going behind the closed doors of Francey's and Morgan's romance. Playing to the differences in class between the upper-crust Morgan's and the rough & tumble Francey, the screenplay by Ernest Pagano/I.A.R. Wylie/Anne Morrison Chapin and P.J. Wolfson spins easy-going Screwball Comedy one liners with a sweet threading of the romance between Morgan and the vivacious lady.
  • jimkis-38 August 2002
    The only pairing of Ginger and Jimmy Stewart is a remarkable comedy with almost no wasted moments. Ginger's sex appeal is much in evidence in this film -- indeed, the film is full of sexual tension as Ginger and Jimmy strive to consummate their marriage -- but are constantly interrupted. In addition to many and varied bits of comedy, there is also a great little dance number where Ginger and Beluah Bondi (!) do the "Big Apple." The cast is perfect and the comedy is timeless. Too bad this is not out on video or DVD! One of the best Ginger solo starring efforts, and watchable again and again!
  • A young professor (Jimmy Stewart) meets a nightclub singer (Ginger Rogers) and it's love at first sight. After a whirlwind courtship, the two marry. He takes her home to meet his conservative parents, but when he gets there he chickens out of telling them about their marriage. The rest of the movie is Jimmy trying to work up the nerve to tell them while everybody gets the wrong idea about Ginger.

    Ginger's great and she does have nice chemistry with Jimmy. The problem is Jimmy's character is so weak that it's hard to sympathize with him. As the movie progresses you find yourself thinking that Ginger could (and should) do better. It's still enjoyable, helped by a great cast. Love the catfight scene. But something is definitely missing. See it for Ginger because she's terrific in this.
  • I admit to being a fan of romantic comedies. This is one of the very best. Stewart and Rogers are fantastic and surrounded by a great cast - most particularly Beulah Bondi and Grady Sutton.

    The best part for 21st century viewers of the "ancient" classic is the amount of sexual tension the director (and Stewart and Rogers) put in the film. The scenes with the murphy bed in Roger's apartment are among the funniest and sexiest every filmed. I'm surprised this got by the censors back then! The pace of the film is excellent, the characters are charming, the romance is engaging, the acting is superb, and the writing is even more so.

    Why this is not available on DVD is beyond me. If you get the chance, watch this film.
  • This is a good film--complete with excellent acting, direction, etc. However, despite all the good there is in the film, the film just didn't come together as well as it could--probably due to a slight miscasting of both leads and because of a major plot hole. The main theme of the movie involves Stewart's family not approving of "that kind of woman" but Ginger Rogers just seems too nice and "swell" for the family to be that disapproving of her. Perhaps a slightly slinkier actress like Joan Crawford could have carried it off better. Also, Jimmy Stewart just didn't seem all that believable as a rich kid. I really can't blame the studio too much as Stewart was still a few years from becoming a star, but his mid-western style just seemed a little out of place. Plus, he was a total wimp throughout the movie. After all, this guy would never tell his parents that he married Ginger because both his mother and father are highly manipulative people (in different ways)--is THIS the sort of character you can care about--not me! So why would Ginger want him after time and again he pretended he didn't even know her and they were husband and wife?! This is just too contrived to be believable.

    So with a score of 6, it's STILL a good film. I particularly liked the cat fight scene--it's one of the funniest and enjoyable fight between women in the history of film. Too bad this great scene is wasted, as with better casting and a much stronger script it might have merited an even higher score and would be more than just a time-passer.
  • This premise of this movie, remarkably spineless son can't tell his parent's he's married an oddly forgiving nightclub singer, is pretty absurd, but what the movie lacks in sense it makes up for in humor. It's a very likable movie with a typically engaging performance by Rogers and a typically amiable one by Stewart.

    The funny thing about this movie is it accepts the family dynamics as just another wacky family, and by the standards of 1940s screwball comedies I suppose it is, but I couldn't help but think about how you could take the same family dynamic - dominating patriarch, a frail, timorous wife, two sons, one fearful and the other somewhat dissolute - and you've the makings of some grim stage drama by Arthur Miller or someone.

    Well, that's the danger of getting older; when I was watching every old movie as a teenager I was oblivious to these contextual issues, but happily I am still able to enjoy a dopey comedy like this one.
  • Quite enjoyable, though it feels like it could be just a bit better. James Stewart plays an uptight college professor who goes to the big city looking for his wild niece. There he also picks up a wife, gorgeous night club singer Ginger Rogers. He knows right away that his conservative father (who is also his boss), Charles Coburn, will not approve of it, so he pretends the girl belongs to his friend, Keith (James Ellison). The big positive of this movie: Ginger. This is easily one of her best roles. She's fantastic. No one else, though, gets much of a chance to shine (with one small exception: Beaulah Bondi, as Stewart's mom). Coburn is a really funny guy, so it's a shame to see him playing such a prick. Stewart never has much to do, and has a late movie drunk act that is, as they always are in classic Hollywood, embarrassing. The film also relies too much on racial humor, including an incredibly unfunny pseudo-sex joke involving Hattie McDaniel. This is still a good time.
  • I have to confess that I was expecting a whole lot more from Vivacious Lady with the two stars in their only screen teaming and a director like George Stevens. Vivacious Lady just didn't do all that much for me.

    The problem I think lays with James Stewart. At the time he was the tall gawky fellow whose innate decency won the girl over to him. He played that part in most of his early films and a lot of his later ones.

    Here though I can't believe Ginger Rogers wasted her time with him. Stewart is a professor of botany at a small college where his father, Charles Coburn is president. He's been sent to New York to track down and bring back his playboy cousin, James Ellison.

    Jimmy finds Ellison at a nightclub where he's been putting the moves on singer Ginger Rogers. Of course what happens is that Jimmy in turn falls for Ginger and then in 24 hours winds up married to her.

    After that the rest of the film is devoted to breaking the news to dear old dad who's one fathead lummox of a man. I'm still trying to figure out why Ginger if she didn't fall for Ellison in the first place, that she didn't walk out and have the marriage annulled.

    It's a case of pushing Jimmy Stewart's screen persona a bit too far. It made no sense for me and Jimmy Stewart is my favorite among the old Hollywood stars. What laughs are in this film come from Ginger Rogers. Fans of her's will love the chick fight she gets into with Frances Mercer who plays Jimmy's rather frigid fiancé from the college.

    Still Vivacious Lady was a major disappointment. No one as vivacious as Ginger should have been wasting her time on this whole family.
  • Kirpianuscus20 August 2017
    a romantic comedy. maybe, a perfect one. because it has all expected ingredients. and, sure, the right actors . it is amusing and touching and courageous. and James Stewart gives his the best in a role who, at the first sigh, reminds many others. because it is so simple. a dysfunctional family, a seductive young woman, a secret and the glamour of Ginger Rogers. all as part of a so contemporary film, ironic, great and real lovely.
  • pcali1 May 2003
    I am, admittedly, a Ginger Rogers and James Stewart fan, and though there seems good chemistry between them in this film, I found the film rather tedious and frustrating to watch. The story line is good but some elements drag on too long. I will say that this is the only film I've seen James Stewart in where I feel like he really needs a kick in the pants! His character is so much of a milquetoast as to be almost beyond belief, although he finally does assert himself much later in the picture.

    Ginger is lovely and charming, and this is a good role for her. Beulah Bondi is a joy, and if you've never seen her dance, you're in for a surprise! I gave this film seven stars, mostly because of Ginger and Beulah, as they are truly the bright spots of this otherwise only-worthy-of-four-stars movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Injecting more romance into its 90 minutes than your typical screwball comedy would, VIVACIOUS LADY also injects considerably more laughter than is the norm, a very happy combination. It's not perfect by any means, falling too clearly into the 'one joke comedy' syndrome, awkwardly stretching its excuses for Jimmy Stewart's hesitations to simply come out and say that he's married the girl (Ginger Rogers), and the almost inevitable George Stevens failing of flaccid pacing from time to time. However, the inherent strength and decency of Stewart as an actor work to alleviate any inherent weaknesses of his character, and anytime momentum flags the movie is quickly rejuvenated by individual set-pieces that are nothing short of hilarious. Add in generally exceptional performances from its well-known cast and it's hard to understand why VIVACIOUS LADY isn't far better known than it is.

    Make no mistake, this is Ginger Rogers' film all the way. Her character of Francie Brent is central to its proceedings, she gets most of the best lines ("Oh, I couldn't take the last piece"), wears the best clothes, receives the most flattering closeups, etc. This is the kind of Star Treatment that Ginger had rarely received in the past (by my count only PROFESSIONAL SWEETHEART and IN PERSON were really built around her), but in the future it would become the norm. She was more than ready for such attention.

    Jimmy Stewart got this job at Ginger's request. If I have the time-line right, they'd dated a couple of years earlier (around the time of TOP HAT), dated again a couple of years later before the Second World War, and remained lifelong friends. He hadn't really done comedy before and VIVACIOUS LADY was the most important role he'd had to date, though YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU and MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON would soon follow. Rogers was right: Stewart's natural modesty and intelligence served him well in the role, and this is probably the first appearance of his permanent cinematic persona. Indeed, the whole cast seems far more prestigious to us than it must have to RKO at the time. Charles Coburn, though 60, was just getting started in the film business, and Beulah Bondi, like Stewart, had yet to do much comedy. No one familiar with Old Hollywood will be surprised at the excellence of their performances, but I must bring attention to James Ellison as Stewart's cousin and semi-rival for Ginger's affections. He gives us a delightfully quirky and good-humored performance in what is usually a thankless, 'Ralph Bellamy' type role. Director Stevens had a reputation as an 'actor's director', and it seems with some justice.

    VIVACIOUS LADY is very much a film of wonderful scenes patched together. It begins with a beautiful series of romantic vignettes between Rogers and Stewart, then takes a hard comedy turn with the first frustration of marital consummation between them as they get train compartment tickets mixed up with those of a battling middle-aged couple who represent a more jaundiced view of the marital state. The cat fight and the Big Apple scenes seem universally loved, but to me the whole rigmarole over the 'Walter' bed is just as admirable (and are there any scenes between, oh, say 1930 and 1964 that so overtly feature two characters with nothing on their minds other than getting into bed with one another?). Also featuring nice comic turns from Franklin Pangborn and Willie Best (the latter overcoming rather weak material), VIVACIOUS LADY may flag at times, but few films recover as completely as does this one. And that last shot is a doozy!
  • redservo23 February 2006
    Warning: Spoilers
    Although a huge Stewart and Rogers fan, I was reluctant to see this film, mostly due to the ridiculous title. But I Tivo-ed it regardless, to share w/ my husband, an ardent Rogers fan. Needless to say, I'm delighted that I did save it.

    At first I was a little put off by the early scenes with the three main characters, mostly because I did not see Ginger Rogers' unique comedic style being utilized to it's fullest. And the dreadful song, "You'll Be Reminded of Me", sung by Rogers, was an almost schizophrenic experience.

    However, as I watched on, the characters became further developed and were at last given the opportunity to show each of their strengths, both comedic and dramatic.

    The strongest of those performances were from Ginger Rogers herself. Her comedic timing and playful nature shined as the film progresses. In addition, the supporting cast was the glue that held the film together, providing the strong base on which the lead actors could relax into a true ensemble performance. Pay attention to the smaller roles of the druggist, the manager of the 'girls only' apartments, the couple on the train, and Stewart's assistant and students. Also delightful, was the performance of James Ellison, a handsome leading man, playing second fiddle to Stewart; playfully witty and always charming, without trying to steal every scene.

    James Stewart also redeemed himself of his somewhat stiff performance early in the film. He gradually builds his character from the inside out, coming out on top, and giving the audience a glimpse into the future of his phenomenal aptitude for comic timing and dramatic talent. And this is definitely one of Stewart's top 'drunk' scenes.

    The writing was sharp and refreshing for the time period, and I believe might even hold it's own in today's films. And the underlying sexual innuendos were surprisingly modern for it's time fulfilling the title of 'romantic comedy' quite well.

    Gratefully, the director allowed this gifted ensemble the time to play up the physical comedy as well, which was one of the film's strongest points. The fight between Rogers and Frances Mercer at the dance was hysterical, and Rogers winning over her reluctant mother-in-law, Beulah Bondi, was delightful.

    My recommendation is this: Ignore the goofy title, be patient through the first few acts, and you'll be delightfully rewarded by the films remainder. For that reason, I gave it a 7 out of 10, and am adding it to my list of favorite classics.
  • It is no secret that my all-time favorite actor is Jimmy Stewart. Every Oscar season, I get an opportunity to catch up on some of his films I haven't seen. Today, Turner Classic Movies played Vivacious Lady. This two-time academy award nominee was a very fun film.

    Ginger Rogers' upbeat and fun-loving leading lady is perfect opposite Stewart's shy, but stouthearted leading man. The two work amazing together. It is the epitome of the screwball comedic-romance popular in the 30' and 40's. I have never been a big fan of Ginger Rogers, but I love her in this.

    If you can tear yourself away from whiz-bang special effects and poorly-written blockbusters featuring today's megastars... movies like these are worth a look. Not only are the actors much more interesting, but the writing is superior to the majority of films released today.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I freely admit to a penchant for the light and even 'screwball' comedies of the 30s/40s and so never having seen or even heard of Vivacious Lady I snapped it up when I found it on a budget CD, on the strength of the two leads and the director. Viewing it for the first time in 2016 I found it somewhat pedestrian and predictable and, given the talent listed above, something of a disappointment and I attributed this to the third key element in any movie, i.e. the writing. Rogers was served much better by Billy Wilder in The Major And The Minor, and had more chemistry with David Niven in Bachelor Mother. This is not to say that Vivacious Lady is a total dog or even unwatchable; it is certainly watchable - once.
  • This is a movie full of Love, Comedy, and Romance all in one excellent movie. We can't get enough of it! All actors did an excellent job in this one. This is one movie we will never get tired of. It is always so refreshing to find a movie like this. If you are feeling down and out this will be a excellent pick-me up.

    I never really knew about Beulah Bondi who plays James Stewart's mom, she is great in this movie. In fact she played his mother in a few other movies. I just realized she was in Tammy and the Doctor (1963) as Annie Call and she was very good in that too.

    If you like this movie with Ginger Rogers, you will also like "The Major and the Minor".

    Another actor I never really knew about is James Ellison, who plays James Stewart's cousin. I really loved him in this movie and would love to see more of his movies. A real handsome man and love to hear his voice.
  • A science professor from a small college travels to New York City where he meets a musical performer and they fall in love at first sight. Professor Peter Morgan (Jimmy Stewart) and his new bride, Francey (Ginger Rogers), take the train back to Old Sharon---his hometown---but when they get there, problems ensue. They have to deal with conservative values, job obligations, and a persistent fiancée. In the meantime, they don't tell anyone they are married.

    Ginger Rogers wrote that making this film was an enjoyable experience. It has a playfulness throughout. One of the best scenes involves a fight between Francey---the new wife----and the fiancée, Helen (Frances Mercer).

    This is a light-hearted romp. And Ginger is indeed vivacious.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is a real favorite of mine. We get to see a young and un-Astaire'd Ginger Rogers film. She doesn't get all the credit though. A stellar cast with jimmy Stewart and Charles Coburn round it out.

    An Associate Professor goes to NY to find and bring his cousin back home. He finds him in a Dance Club and he refuses to come until the lead girl dancer/singer marries him. He decides to hide from his cousin but it doesn't work out. The Singer immediately has a connection with his cousin and they get married the same day. Now, they both have to go home and tell his overbearing Professor of the University father that they are married. It won't be an easy task.

    I've never been a big dance/musical fan so it was a real treat to see this early Ginger Rogers comedy. It was one of the first I saw of hers and it still remains one of my favorites. She's very sweet and appealing when she meets Jimmy Stewart but when they get back to his small home town, she has to deal with a girl that "thinks-she's-his-girlfriend". After this, the real Ginger Rogers spunkiness comes out. She's a pistol in this one. There is some dancing in this but it's pretty minimal. Watch Charles Coburn play the stodgy father of Jimmy Stewart. He never falters in these roles and this one is no different. Jimmy Stewart is his usual shy and clumsy self and rarely misses in films he was in. Again, this one is no different.

    On a side note...towards the end in the train scene, watch for Willie Best as the train porter. He barely says a word but he doesn't have to to make you laugh. For a small part he really does get the most of it. Such a funny moment it had to be mentioned.

    Just a sweet funny comedy all the way around. Not a bad word to say about this one.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Produced and directed by George Stevens, with a screenplay by P.J. Wolfson and Ernest Pagano that was based on I.A.R. Wylie's story, this uneven romantic comedy features Ginger Rogers, in the title role, and James Stewart.

    Watching this film, I found myself both laughing out loud AND waiting for certain tired scenes to end (like the endless whistling at Rogers). Plus, I don't usually find the clichéd circumstance of a character deciding to get drunk (as Stewart's does), in order to solve a problem, amusing. Still, there are some absolutely hilarious, delightful scenes which make this one worth the 90 minutes it takes to watch it, despite the fact that there is little chemistry between its two leads (which may be the reason that this was their only film together). Like most films of this genre, "suspension of disbelief" is required to enjoy it at all.

    The cast also includes James Ellison, Beulah Bondi (whose scenes with Rogers are some of the best sequences), Charles Coburn, and little known Frances Mercer (in her first film; she made less than 10 films in the 1930's) in addition to several recognizable supporting actors: Franklin Pangborn, Grady Sutton as a befuddled teaching assistant, Jack Carson as a nightclub waiter (!), and Willie Best as an emoting train porter (in the slowest sequence near the end). Hattie McDaniel also appears uncredited as a maid. Cinematographer Robert De Grasse and Sound technician James Wilkinson earned their only Oscar nominations for their work on this film.

    While retrieving his cousin Keith (Ellison) from a drunken binge in New York, Peter Morgan Jr. (Stewart) falls in love and weds a nightclub singer named Francey (Rogers), who had been the object of Keith's obsession before Peter arrived. Their "meeting to marriage" happens within 24 hours. The three return home by train to the Morgans' small college town of Old Sharon, where Peter is a botany professor at the university; his staunch father is its president.

    Peter Morgan Sr.'s (Coburn) father had been president as well, and expects nothing less than his proper son to follow this tradition, in his footsteps. When Peter sees that his rather intimidating father is waiting at the station with Helen (Mercer), who was supposedly his fiancée, Peter tells Francey that he needs time to break the news of their nuptials to Helen, his conservative father, and his weak hearted mother (Bondi).

    Naturally, Keith jumps right in and volunteers to pretend that Francey is his girl, and they dash off - after Francey "checks out" Helen - leaving Peter wondering if he can trust his cousin. Initially, Francey even stays in Keith's flat until Peter insists that she move out, and into an all girls apartment (run by Pangborn, of course).

    The rest of the story from this point is sequence after sequence of interruptions and circumstances which prevent Peter from telling his parents that Francey is actually his wife AND keep the couple from consummating their marriage (one of the funniest scenes involve the two hoping a wall bed will fall into place).

    During this time, Keith, Peter, and Francey pretend that she is a new botany student at the university, and all the while she is caught in unflattering and improper incidents by Peter's uncompromising father, who still assumes she is one of Keith's trollops. One of these is at a prom, where Francey gets in a cat fight (more than just slapping) with the still unawares Helen; another is in her apartment, where stern Morgan Sr. catches her line dancing with Keith and Mrs. Morgan (his wife!), who'd earlier admitted to Francey that her weak heart was feigned. His disapproval causes Mrs. Morgan, who now knows that Francey is married to Peter Jr., to leave her husband, saying she's tired of 30 years of having to behave a certain way so as not to risk losing an endowment for the college, etc..

    Morgan Sr.'s brief but frank talk with Francey (e.g. she's not the right kind of girl for his son's future) causes her to leave Old Sharon. Francey and Mrs. Morgan, who had previously bonded, end up on the same train in adjoining berths and, after the aforementioned drunken sequence, Peters Jr. & Sr. realize what they've lost and chase after them ... so that the requisite happy ending can occur.
  • I read a couple of bad reviews for this movie. But as I started watching it, I liked it. James Stewart and Ginger Rogers were both doing a good job and I really liked Stewart's character. But the movie went nowhere.

    It is just a one joke movie that is extended painfully long. It like a chewing gum really. You enjoy it in the start, it has good flavor. But as time goes on it becomes bland and then finally it seems to use up all the moisture in your mouth making it dry.

    A pity really, because with a good plot they could have been able to make a fine movie.
An error has occured. Please try again.