Stand Up and Fight (1939) User Reviews (9)

Another Rugged Role for Bob Taylor

[bkoganbing · 6/10 · 30 November 2005]

In casting Robert Taylor in Stand Up And Fight, MGM was trying to broaden his appeal. His first few films established him as a handsome, but callow youth. Camille was a typical part for him. In doing this film, A Yank at Oxford, and Killer McCoy, MGM was trying to create a more masculine image for its heart throb.

Taylor plays the impoverished heir of a plantation in Maryland who is forced to sell his assets which of course in that society included black slaves. He's forced to go to work for a living and he gets a job with the new Baltimore and Ohio Railroad.

The B&O's main competition is a stage and freight line which does a side business in capturing runaway slaves and returning them to their masters. The guys doing this are Charles Bickford and Barton MacLane with a wink and nod from manager Wallace Beery.

It's quite a culture shock for Taylor. He's grown up believing that blacks might be human, but of an inferior brand. The business that Bickford and MacLane are in disgusts him.

Taylor and Beery got good notices for this film. Starting out as antagonists both in business and generationally, they gain a grudging respect for the other.

The depiction of blacks as menials is the reason Stand Up And Fight is not broadcast too often. You run into a peculiar conundrum in dealing with movies about slavery. Because of the position they're in blacks have to act as subservient simply to survive and that in itself becomes offensive.

Roots changed all of that, but by that time Robert Taylor and Wallace Beery were gone as was director Woody Van Dyke. Stand Up And Fight surely isn't Roots by any means, but considering the era it was probably groundbreaking for its day, as was Paramount's Souls at Sea a few years earlier. Not many films dealt with slavery at all.

Not bad....but also a bit strange.

[planktonrules · 6/10 · 11 April 2010]

Before I start, I would like to point out that the film was set in 1844 and practically everyone uses revolvers--even though this sort of gun was super-rare at that time. Revolvers would become more common in the 1850s-1860, but in 1844 you just didn't see them because they were so new. Yet, oddly, EVERYBODY seems to have one in the shootout near the end of the film! The revolver was NOT a reliable weapon and few could afford them if they could even find one back then! Oh, well, there are worse historical mistakes I've seen in other films...and I notice them, as I was a history teacher.

The story is one of the stranger ones I've ever seen concerning slavery. It isn't really bad...just very, very unusual--especially in its way of portraying the fugitive slave trade. The film begins with Robert Taylor selling off his plantation and slaves because of his debts. It's obvious that he's pretty attached to his slaves and makes sure the families aren't separated--but he STILL sells them like they are property. So, seeing him working for the abolitionist cause later in the film is a bit of a surprise.

A bit later, officials with the B&O Railroad try to hire Taylor as an agent to investigate the illegal slave trade and how it might relate to a local transportation company. I liked seeing the old fashioned trains from the 1840s that you see in the film, but Taylor wasn't as impressed nor was he willing to take the railroad's offer. However, oddly, investigating this trade is EXACTLY what Taylor ends up doing--and it hits close to home when one of his old slaves is killed by the scum behind the scheme.

Taylor's nemesis throughout the film is the mean and blustery Wallace Beery. His acting, as usual, is far from subtle and he chews up practically every scene in which he appears. As a result, Taylor's good acting is all the more obvious! Overall, an interesting film--mostly because other films made around the same time didn't seem to care much about the plight of slaves. By comparison, think about the way Blacks are portrayed in "Gone With the Wind" which also came out the same year. Sure, it's a great film, but it also made slavery seem not so bad! So "Stand Up and Fight" should at least be given some credit for its rather progressive theme. The only major complaint I had about the film was the ending--it seemed a bit weak.

A must for train buffs.

[JohnHowardReid · 7/10 · 31 May 2018]

Original release prints were processed in sepia. Copyright 3 January 1939 by Loew's Inc. A Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Picture. New York opening at the Capitol: 26 January 1939. U.S. release: 6 January 1939. Australian release: 9 March 1939. 105 minutes.

COMMENT: Beery receives top billing, even though his role is smaller - due to the fact that he doesn't come on for quite a spell. He is his usual lovable slob, blustering heavily all over the place. Much publicity was made of his two fist-fights with Taylor, but seen today it is obvious that while Beery does most of his own slugging, "Pretty Boy" is doubled for all but the close shots.

Speeded-up action doesn't help conviction either. Other camera tricks include process screens in the fox hunt and train ride. Nonetheless we love the train with its converted coach carriages (startlingly unique). Miss Rice is a most attractive (and attractively photographed) heroine. It's good to see Taylor in a period picture, a nice sprawling bit of lavishly produced action-romance.

Woody's direction is pacey but undistinguished, although we are treated to great camerawork and costumes.

Miss Broderick holds up the comic relief ably, despite weak lines. Qualen has a big part as T's sidekick. So does Rosemond as an ex-slave. Bickford and MacLane are brief villains.

OTHER VIEWS: Beery and Taylor got on well together, as Taylor was actually a hunting pal of grouchy Wally off the set. The script is designed to give both stars opportunities. Beery is richly colorful, Taylor virile yet sympathetic in the same man's-man way. Both relish a fight. Both are short with the ladies. Taylor presents his characterization much more convincingly than over-the-top Beery.

Of course when it comes to their actual fist-fighting, a double for Taylor is very obviously used in all but the close-ups. The more experienced Beery, who knew how to pull and avoid punches, slugs it out with Taylor's double in the medium and long shots.

Unfortunately, Van Dyke decided to garnish the rough stuff by speeding up the action. The end result looks phony. Nor is audience involvement helped by a number of extraneous scenes which pad out the running time and slow down the action. Trimming would certainly help. Even the climax in the snow seems to take forever to resolve into its totally anticipated conclusion.

Despite a fair bit of money thrown at the screen, Stand Up and Fight too often lacks vigor. In fact Van Dyke exhibits so little of his customary flair and pacey fluid style, one could be excused for concluding the movie was actually directed by Richard Thorpe. - John Howard Reid writing as George Addison.

Ahead if it's time, this movie deals with a number of issues

[oleeb · 29 July 2018]

This is an interesting story and quite progressive for it's time. I've noticed that a couple of previous user reviews are inaccurate in terms of what goes on in the story. Robert Taylor is a spoiled aristocrat who loses his estate and lifestyle in the slave state of Marylan and for the first time in his life is forced to seek work. He is attracted to a beautiful Boston woman who owns a stagecoach line in western Maryland (Cumberland). He is arrogant and spurns the love interest who suggests he find work and himself heads west to Cumberland where he turns down a job working for the new B & O Railroad and ends up in jail after a bar fight. He is bailed out by Wallace Beery's character who runs the stage coach line and also profits on the side by using the line's wagons to spirit fugitive slave to freedom in nearby Pennsylvania. Unbehknownst to Beery, the man he thinks is an abolitionist running the slaves to freedom is actually reselling them into slavery in the south and murdering those slaves he cannot sell. This complicated tale becomes more complicated when the love interest arrives in Cumberland to "inspect" her stage coach line and finds that Robert Taylor is in jail and Wallace Beery has paid his bail in exchange for 3 months free labor on the stagecoach line. Taylor and Beery don't like one another at all and clash throughout the build of the movie even gettng into two fist fights. Talyor learns that the stage coach line's wagons are being used to resell the slaves who think they are headed to freedom and exposes it believing Beery's character is in on the heinous crime being perpetrated. In the end Taylor's efforts reveal the true nature of the man posing as an abolitionist but really selling the slaves back into slavery and the conflict between himself and Beery is resolved and in the bargain he gets the girl too. After all, it is Hollywood. Very interesting movie on numerous fronts including the slavery issue and it's many intriguting/horrifying facets, watching the very young Robert Taylor in action as a dashing young man who transforms from dilletente into an honorable , courageous man and to see Beery portraying a bigger than life ruffian who, though out for himself, is also a decent human being who wants to help slaves get to freedom. Definitely worth watching.

Knowing Some History Helps

[ResoluteGrunt · 7/10 · 15 November 2015]

Perhaps a little historical perspective might assist some of today's viewers of this film. (Those viewing the film in 1939 would have been naturally much more knowledgeable of that history than most viewers today.)

The film "Stand Up And Fight" (USA, 1939) depicts a fictional story within a complex and multi-faceted historical background. The story is set in 1844 Cumberland Maryland, which became a key east-west point along the westward settler route through the Appalachian Mountains, and a key north-south point along the underground railroad assisting escaped slaves -- when the B&O Railroad opened in 1842, the nation's first Telegraph lines went operational, and the C&O Canal opened in 1850 -- all using rights of way along the same Potomac River that flows past Cumberland and on down past Washington DC.

Within this context the story concerns a pre-Civil War racket involving the capture and reselling of fugitive slaves in a key border location between abolitionist North and slavery South just as the railroad was beginning to compete hard against the stagecoach and wagon trains, and the canal was about to move huge quantities of coal out of the mountains. Most of the laborers building the railroad, the canal, the telegraph and the coal mines were uneducated and impoverished recent escapees from the British-oppressed serf plantation of Ireland.

Mid-way along that 120-mile Potomac River route between Cumberland and Washington is strategic Harper's Ferry, where the Shenandoah river meets the Potomac and where John Brown's Raid on an armory in 1859 began to galvanize large portions of the nation's public opinion on each side of the slavery/secession issue. At the time of Brown's raid, Harper's Ferry was in the big slavery (Confederate) state of Virginia, which was also the state just across the river in Cumberland in the abolitionist (Union) state of Maryland.

The American Civil War began in April 1961. West Virginia became a state a few months later following the Wheeling Conventions of 1861, in which abolitionist delegates from 30 northwestern Virginia counties decided to break away from Virginia. West Virginia immediately became a key Civil War border state and was formally admitted to the Union in June 1863. West Virginia was the only state to form by separating from a Confederate state, the first to separate from any state since Maine separated from Massachusetts in 1820.

The north-south terrain of the Appalachian Mountains is what enabled General Lee to move a huge Confederate army through the Shenandoah all the way north into Pennsylvania to meet a similar huge Union army at Gettysburg – far behind Northern "lines" – during the first three days of July in 1863.

Remarkable subtlety

[mik-19 · 8/10 · 12 September 2004]

Cynical Southern gentleman Blake Cantrell (Robert Taylor) is forced to sell his plantation and seek employment with a stagecoach company run by Captain Starkey (Wallace Beery) and owned by lovely Susan (Florence Rice). But is the company actually illegally transporting slaves? And can a leopard, the cavalier Blake, actually change its spots?

I didn't expect much from this movie, and was thoroughly and positively surprised by the sharp writing and ebullient acting, and contrary to many A-movies of its day its aim is no way an aesthetic 'arty' one. Made in 1939, this movie addresses all sorts of controversial issues, and they have a way of taking you by surprise along the way. The movie is really about abolitionism and treats its subject with remarkable subtlety, although why and how the lynch-mob, the one that we encounter in the last third of the film, goes after white man Starkey is never made quite clear. Cantrell's gradual moral reform is well-explained and plausible, not least because of Taylor's warmth and humanity in the part. Yes, he is handsome, but here it is almost besides the point. Wallace Beery has a field day with the larger-than-life captain, very cleverly balancing on the edge of buffoonery but with plenty of edge and ambiguity.

See it, it makes a deep impression.

Robert Taylor and Charles Bickford

[marthawilcox1831 · 2/10 · 29 July 2014]

This film probably would have been better if Robert Taylor was pitted against Charles Bickford rather than Wallace Berry. I didn't believe their confrontation, but I do believe that if Taylor was up against Bickford then their confrontation would be believable. Taylor redeems himself by demanding that enslaved African-Americans be sold as a family rather than splitting them up. The film would have been better if we had an enslaved African-American character that we could identify with. The fugitive African-American is too old to be sold as a house slave and is in danger of being killed off as he is unsaleable. Taylor befriends him and we have the germ of an intimate acquaintanceship. This subject matter was dealt with better in 'Roots'.

"One take Woody does it again"

[raskimono · 8/10 · 15 October 2003]

In this slightly unconventional western which does not always follow the usual stylings and cliches of the western, Woody S. Van Dyke, the biggest director, box-office wise on the MGM lot has created a crowd pleaser and a good one too. To believe, this movie deals with trafficking of slaves as an aberration. The movie is set up north where most of the people are abolitionist. There is even a scene where the townspeople want to hang a white man for killing a black man. I kid you not. Taylor is our poverty-stricken southern man who has lost it all and now has to work for a living. Beery runs a stage coach company on the side that helps slaves escape. But someone is capturing this slaves and reselling them back to the southerners. Taylor, when an ex-slave he sets free gets caught decides to find out who. Also, there is a changing of an era clash as the early unrefined and prototype steam engine is just getting started and wants to buy the stagecoach company and its route to link up its tracks. Taylor works for them. Beery and Taylor clash. So who is capturing and reselling the slaves? Is it Beery? If not, then who? Or is Taylor a spy for the railroad company? If not, what is he up to? Enough said. Two big stars who are charming and likable. A romantic interest. MGM cinematography and scenery. A big hit for the studio.

Good movie on many fronts, train lovers should take a look...

[lsheffer-95997 · 8/10 · 14 January 2016]

This is not your typical cowboy movie, or 'western' Stand up and Fight has good character development, and attempts to be historically accurate for the 1840s. While the dialog Robert Taylor must deliver to explain his position on selling his slaves seems more a 20th century attitude, it is reflecting some of the 19th century writings that have come down to us- but certainly not a justification. This movie piqued my curiosity about what train was used in the train scenes. After a little research, I found it to be the replica built in 1927 of the Norris Lafayette 4-2-0. The replica was built for the 'Fair of the Iron Horse' and B&O's anniversary. This train is in the Baltmore and Ohio railroad museum in Maryland, along with what appear to be the same passenger cars used in the movie. Apparently it is still working, and is occasionally taken out and run. There are you tube videos of it.

Wonderful scenes of this train running are had in the movie. The Lafayette is an historic train, so train lovers, enjoy.