Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    Directed by Anatole Litvak, John Garfield plays Tommy Gordon, a small time hood who is working his way to the top against the wishes of his girlfriend Kay Manners, played by Ann Sheridan. When he forgets it's his bad luck night (Saturday) and pulls a job anyway, naturally he gets caught.

    Since Gordon's lawyer (Jerome Cowan) has always been able to get him off easily in the past, he's a pretty cocky guy. However, this time he gets sent to Sing Sing, the "castle", and it takes some isolation treatment by the warden, played by Pat O'Brien, to get him to conform enough to be released into the prison population.

    Kay visits him in prison and says she's working with his lawyer to get him out. Gordon doesn't trust his lawyer, thinking he's making a play for Kay, and tells her to stay away from him. Gordon soon befriends a couple of cons played by Burgess Meredith, the smart guy, and Guinn "Big Boy" Williams, a dumb lug and they all hatch a plan to escape.

    On the night of the escape, Gordon realizes it's Saturday night and refuses to leave his cell. Good thing too because, the warden was tipped off and, Meredith is killed in the attempt, while Williams is sentenced to die because a guard was killed. When the warden realizes that Gordon didn't try to escape, he begins to trust him.

    Later, Gordon is summoned by the warden and told that Kay has been in an auto accident and isn't expected to live. If Gordon will promise to come back, the warden will let him go to see her. He promises to return even if it means the chair. As he's leaving the warden's office, he notices that it's Saturday but goes on anyway.

    On his way to see Kay, Gordon picks up a tail from a policeman who can't believe what he's seeing. When Gordon gets to the bedridden Kay, he learns that his lawyer was indeed moving in on her and was the cause of her injuries. He takes her gun and starts to leave to settle the matter when Kay convinces him not to and to give her the gun. About that time, the lawyer shows up and the two men start fighting. When the lawyer appears to get the upper hand, Kay shoots him. The policemen hears the shot and tries to force Kay's apartment door. Gordon flees with the gun and the lawyers money.

    Gordon hooks up with his old gang and arranges for safe passage out of town on a boat. However, upon reading the headlines and seeing that the warden will lose his position for letting him go, he decides to return. Kay insists she shot the lawyer but nobody believes her and Gordon is sentenced to die.

    The ending of the film is very good, with Williams having to face his fate before Garfield, John Litel as the prison chaplain, and a couple of more scenes with Sheridan and O'Brien as Gordon faces his fate.

    FYI, noted character actor Henry O'Neill plays a district attorney in the film.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    A young John Garfield leaves his girl friend, Ann Sheridan, and is sent to Sing Sing, assured by his lawyer, Jerome Cowan, that he'll be gotten out shortly. Unfortunately, Jerome Cowan, whatever else he may be, is a lawyer and has his own agenda. The cocky Garfield makes light of his tribulations in the slams while Cowan pursues Sheridan.

    Garfield begins to get smart under the tutelage of the tough but fair warden, Pat O'Brien. (John Litel is the priest in this one.) He behaves himself. And when the warden receives a telegram informing Garfield that his girl may not live through the night, O'Brien gives him a brief parole to visit her.

    Things go wrong. While visiting Sheridan at the hospital, Garfield runs into Cowan, whose treachery is now revealed. Sheridan shoots and kills Cowan to save Garfield from being beaten to death. Garfield escapes and is blamed for the death. (I forget where that gun came from.) But he mans up and turns himself in anyway. He shouldn't have.

    It's an odd, play-like movie, with good performances, inexpensive sets, one location shot of the exterior of Grand Central Station in New York, Guinn "Big Boy" Williams doing his best to act, Sheridan looking good, and eliciting myriad unspoken questions about capital punishment. It's so terribly irreversible.

    But the climax is unusual. Here is Garfield, a protagonist, not a bad guy, loving and in his own way honorable, yet he marches off with a smile, a wisecrack, and a cigarette to the electric chair. I kept waiting for the last-minute phone call from the governor. But no. All that fades in after his retreating figure is "The End."
  • jotix10024 October 2010
    Warning: Spoilers
    Tommy Gordon, a criminal seen at the start of the story, is a suave man. He is well regarded in the best places in the Manhattan of the era, where his presence is well regarded. Unfortunately, his luck runs out when he is found guilty of the robbery, he masterminded. His beautiful girlfriend, Kay, is devastated. It is hard to believe with all of Tommy's connections, he could land in Sing Sing, one of the toughest prisons in the country.

    The idea that he will have to give up his clothes in exchange for the prison garb, does not go well with Tommy. He does not endear himself to the guards, or Walter Long, the warden. After realizing his influence and good standing in the criminal world will not let him get anywhere, he decides to join the system in getting himself sent to the shoe factory. There he meets Steve Rockport, another con, preparing an escape. Fortunately for Tommy, the plan goes wrong for his friend, but he remains in his cell, when he could have tried to escape as well.

    Warden Long begins to take another look at Gordon, for he thinks he is toeing the line. When Kay, his lover has a terrible accident, Tommy appeals to Long to let him go to her. Long, who has a good heart, makes a deal with Tommy and allow him to go for a short time to Kay. Trouble follows him in the shape of his former pal Ed Crowley coming to see Kay and there is a scuffle among them. Kay, trying to protect Tommy shoots Ed. The police, summoned to the apartment, takes Tommy back to Sing Sing. Later on, he is found guilty of murder in the first degree and condemned to the electric chair.

    Directed by Anatole Litvak, this is another remake of Lewis Lawes' "Twenty Thousand Years in Sing Sing". The film is a good adaptation, but it has a fatal flaw: we do not believe for a moment the warden, any warden, would have allowed Tommy to leave the prison on his own word. Add to that the fact that such a high security place offered no possibility of escape in any form, although we are sure, must have been tried.

    John Garfield makes a wonderful Tommy Gordon full of bravado. This actor was always a welcome presence in any of the films in which appeared. He was charismatic, distilling a positive aura into anything he played. Pat O'Brien is Warden Long, the man who believe in Tommy, perhaps naively. Ann Sheridan casts a sophisticated aura on her Kay, the woman that loved Gordon. Burgess Meredith was Steve Rockport, the con man who wanted to escape. Jerome Cowan, one of the busiest character actors of the era is seen as Crowley.
  • Anatole Litvak directs this remake of 20,000 YEARS IN SING SING. Very faithful to the original starring Spenser Tracy. Tommy Gordon (John Garfield) is a mobster with a super ego. He does not worry about his prison sentence, because he figures his connections on the outside will make his 'time in the can' easier. Enter the stern, but kind hearted warden (Pat O'Brien) and the stand by her man girlfriend (Ann Sheridan)and we have the typical players of a basic prison drama.

    Garfield plays the role with more attitude than Tracy did. Also starring are Burgess Meredith, Henry O'Neill, Guinn Williams and Jerome Cowan. Hard to notice any change in script from the first version eight years earlier. Very good opener for a Litvak double header that also features CONFESSIONS of a NAZI SPY.
  • SFTeamNoir14 July 2020
    John Garfield provides the power as a gung-ho gangster who struggles to accept his time at Sing Sing in this prison reform drama. A faithful remake of 20,000 Years At Sing Sing that leans more to its 30s gangster roots than to the nascent style of film noir. Though the plot itself is harsh, the film lacks subtlety, portrays the prison staff as noble stewards bent on rehabilitation, and aims for sentimentality over action.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This film is a remake of 20,000 YEARS IN SING SING and while it is not bad at all (in fact, perhaps better than the original), the movie really has a couple lame-brained moments that you must be able to ignore in order to enjoy the movie. Without these dopey moments, the film merits a 7 or even 8 on IMDb, but come on,...these problems are pretty severe! For the first 80% of the film, the movie is pretty good fare. John Garfield is an ego-centric hood that thinks he's just too smart and important to ever go to prison. But, to his utter surprise, he gets sent to the "big house" and he has MAJOR problems adapting--after, he thinks he merits special favors and treatment. Well, all this is pretty exciting and fun to watch. BUT, the big plot twist is total cornball! When Garfield's girlfriend is almost killed, the warden feels sorry for him and lets him go for an unescorted pass--even though he was convicted of armed robbery, assault and attempted murder of a cop!!!! Talk about a hair-brained idea! Plus, at times, the girlfriend (Ann Sheridan) is pretty annoying since she seems to have absolutely no self-esteem or common sense.

    However, despite these serious problems, the film is indeed entertaining. Since I am a major fan of 1930s Warner Brothers films, I can overlook this. Many probably cannot and so there are certainly much better prison or gangster movies out there that are more likely to please.
  • ksf-23 October 2017
    L.W. Lawes wrote the original story, which has been made over a couple times. Garfield had only been in Hollywood a couple years when he made this. Garfield and Sheridan star as Tommy and Kay, with their trials and tribulations, as Tommy is in and out of jail. Pat O'Brien is the warden, his antagonist. Grant Mitchell and Burgess Meredith are in here with minor roles. The usual prison flick capers. Escape attempts. Prisoner scuffles. Pretty well done. Volume goes up and down, but the picture quality is quite good. Must have been restored. Directed by Litvak.. he and Garfield also made "Out of the Fog" together. Sadly, Garfield croaked pretty young at 39, of heart issues. He had been caught up in the communist scare of the 1940s. For a really Great Garfield film, see "Postman Always Rings Twice". Much better all around. Postman shows on Turner and may other channels pretty often.
  • This is a very melancholy crime drama in which a very arrogant young gangster gets pinched by the cops and goes up the river where the warden isn't very sympathetic to his "tough guy" attitude or ways. Eventually the warden wears him down and becomes a semi-productive prisoner. Until a fellow inmate wants to make a breakout attempt to see his pregnant girl and he panics when he discovers it's on Saturday...his unlucky day.

    The gangster is played by John Garfield and he has a very sympathetic and understanding girlfriend played by Ann Sheridan.

    There are no real likable or sympathetic characters, but it was a short prison-centric gang story for those who might enjoy that.

    One of my favorite lines: "Come on and shove over. What do you want me to do catch cold?"-Tommy.
  • Lejink28 February 2023
    John Garfield steps into the shoes of, most obviously Spencer Tracy (it is, after all, a remake of the earlier "20000 Years in Sing Sing") and also Cagney (in "Angels With Dirty Faces") in Anatole Litvak's prison drama, even finding himself pitted against Tracy's old mate and Cagney's "Angels" co-star Pat O'Brien.

    Garfield is the upwardly mobile mobster who finally takes a fall, winding up in the notorious Osining or Sing Sing penitentiary under the tough but fair governorship of O'Brien. Garfield is initially defiant but it's amazing what three months in solitary confinement and worrying about the girl you left behind, in this case, Ann Sheridan can do to even the toughest of tough guys and soon the one-time rebel is starting to play ball with the law, to use Dylan's phrase.

    When he learns that Sheridan is critically ill after a close encounter with his supposedly supportive but in truth, backstabbing lawyer, Garfield's good behaviour inside sees him allowed out by the benevolent governor on an own-recognisance overnight furlough (whoever heard of such a thing for such a dangerous criminal!), to visit his ailing girl, but rats!, this falls on a Saturday which as we've already been made well aware, is Jinx-day for Johnny.

    Sure enough, it all goes wrong when Garfield visits Sheridan in hospital and accidentally encounters his two-timing lawyer and there's also the little matter of the governor, who stands to lose his job if Garfield doesn't do the honourable thing and turn himself back in, leaving the stage clear for a climactic Rocky Sullivan-type dilemma for our hero.

    Litvak keeps the action moving briskly and there's good synergy among the three leads, enmeshing Garfield's typically hot-wired demeanour, O'Brien's paternal concern and Sheridan's blind devotion. A young Burgess Meredith also makes a good impression as a would-be escapee.

    As usual, Litvak inserts a montage or three into the action, but overall this short but sharp early-noir thriller built around the charismatic Garfield is well worth tracking down.
  • This is a silly,cliche-ridden prison movie that is nevertheless entertaining and interesting. An almost-unrecognizable (young!) Burgess Meredith plays a good part here in this film as a fellow-inmate of the star inmate/gangster played by John Garfield.

    As far as the actual storyline goes,it's all just a bit too much to believe,in fact some of it is downright ridiculous to put it gently.

    However,this is a beautifully-made black and white film that is interesting from start to finish. The film/print quality was crystal-clear,the action scenes are pretty wild and suspenseful. Overall,I liked it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    John Garfield was at his best here in this 1940 prison drama. He is a cocky individual, too sure of himself due to political ties, who soon finds himself in prison for robbery.

    He thinks he can play the system but soon finds out otherwise by Warden Pat O'Brien. Garfield is tough, but also quite realistic.

    Burgess Meredith plays a college graduate also in prison who leads an ill-fated escape attempt which the Garfield character refuses to participate in due to his fear that bad things always befall him on Saturday.

    Ann Sheridan plays the faithful girlfriend, and pulls out all the stops in the death scene with Garfield.

    This film subtly is anti-death penalty. It brings out how a dimwitted person was executed for a police killing during the attempted breakout. It also showed how Garfield paid the ultimate price for a murder he didn't do. He just wouldn't be believed as circumstances warranted that.
  • Except for some opening scenes that show the crime that John Garfield is sent to prison for, Castle on the Hudson is a virtual word for word remake of 20,000 Years in Sing Sing.

    But it's better cast. John Garfield does far better here than Spencer Tracy did in the original. In fact this was the second remake that Garfield did that improved on the original. He was also better in They Made Me a Criminal than Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. in The Life of Jimmy Dolan.

    Also a big improvement is Burgess Meredith over Lyle Talbot as the stir crazy convict whose escape attempt is a flop.

    Still though there is that nutty premise of warden Pat O'Brien giving a one day furlough to Garfield where he gets in trouble. Same as the original film, it just doesn't ring true.

    Or should I say any more true.
  • Cocky gangster (Garfield) goes to prison where he gradually reforms until given a break by the prison warden (O'Brien). Then problems ensue.

    Typically gritty Warner Bros. fare from the pre-war era. Garfield shows he's in the same gangster class as Cagney and Robinson. Watch him spit out dialog faster than a machine gun burst while doing a tough-guy routine. And who better to double-cross him than that slippery lounge lizard Jerome Cowan who could machine gun his own dialog as a reporter in dozens of period films.

    But the real scene stealer is scrawny, athletic Burgess Meredith, a brainy con who outwits the prison head-doctor (Grant Mitchell) in the movie's best scene. He may be the least-likely looking con I've seen; still, he and Garfield make a dynamic leadership team (as long as it's not Saturday!). On the other hand, goofy Big Boy Williams strikes me as a matter of taste.

    It's a compelling, if not original, plot that redeems Garfield without whitewashing him. Still, I'm not sure what his actual capital crime is when they lead him away, especially when the all-powerful Production Code insisted that justice be served on this side of the pearly gates. Nonetheless, his scenes with the warden (O'Brien) are nicely shaded gems of growing respect, while a lovely Sheridan is affecting as the luckless girlfriend.

    As this gutsy little programmer shows, star-studded MGM may have had the gloss, but plebeian Warner's had the grit.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    When violent criminal John Garfield ends up in Attica, he starts off be being just as violent behind bars as he was on the streets. But he has a code due to patterns in his own life that he doesn't take risks on Saturday, and after an equally violent prisoner (Burgess Meredith) plans a breakout, Garfield's in until he finds out the intended day, impressing warden Pat O'Brien by not participating. He earns enough trust to gain temporary leave when girlfriend Ann Sheridan ends up in the hospital, but circumstances beyond his control threaten to keep him from returning.

    This remake of "20,000 Years in Sing Sing" is probably one of the few A grade Warner Brothers remakes (along side "The Maltese Falcon"), and briskly moves along thanks to the superb direction of Anatole Litvak who turns a prison picture into a work of art. Certainly there are aspects of the plot that don't make much sense and weakens it overall, but when something is so good, those aspects are forgivable. Garfield may not be a likeable guy here, but his performance is top notch, and the result nearly superb.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    . . . "insurrection," many Americans are curious about the ruckus instigated by Que. One need look no further than CASTLE ON THE HUDSON from the always eponymous Warner Bros, to ferret out an urgent warning and unravel the Riddle of Que. CASTLE's "Tommy" is an innocent man executed for the crime of another. Walking to the Death Chamber, Tom is as nonchalant as a condemned man passing out poems on the way to the gallows, guillotine, gas chamber or whatever can be. Of course the prophetic prognosticators of Warner had Tom's virtual namesake Tim in mind when they created this cautionary character. When Rome executed the Nazarene, it soon brought down their Empire. That's what happens when a Society murders an innocent man. When America failed to heed the warning of Tom and slew Tim, the latter came back as Que as surely as Satan made big red apples. No one can stuff the genii back in the lamp, cram toothpaste back in the tube or permanently evict Tim Q. Public from the U. S. Capitol.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Copyright 17 February 1940 by Warner Bros Pictures, Inc. New York opening at the Globe: 3 March 1940. U.S. release: 15 July 1940. Australian release: 18 April 1940 (sic). 77 minutes. Censored to 58 minutes in Australia.

    U.K. and Australian release title: YEARS WITHOUT DAYS.

    SYNOPSIS: Mobster Tommy Gordon is not worried about being sentenced to Sing Sing because he believes his political pals will get him a fast parole. He tells his girlfriend, Kay, not to worry. He makes no effort to reform in prison, and after causing a near-riot is given three months in solitary confinement by Warden Long, a dedicated prison reformer. After the ninety days in solitary, Tommy concedes that his friends have deserted him, and he joins a group of convicts planning to escape.

    NOTES: A re-make of 20,000 Years in Sing Sing (1932).

    John Garfield was extremely popular in Australia when this film was released, but close to 20 minutes of censor cuts put paid to any hopes that Warner Bros entertained for big money at Oz ticket windows. Instead the movie had to be released at flat rates as a "B"-grade support.

    COMMENT: It's hard to believe that Anatole Litvak had anything to do with this limp re-make, let alone direct it. Great cast too. But despite forceful playing by the charismatic Garfield and personable Sheridan, the characters never really come across. As a result, the story has little impact. Weak support playing by Pat O'Brien (especially) and Jerome Cowan doesn't help.

    True, part of the problem lies in the script. O'Brien's role is not built up sufficiently to make him a sympathetic figure. He's always just a minor character. This lack of audience empathy with Warden Long robs the climax of much of its drama.

    Of the big support cast, only Burgess Meredith really makes an impression, though Guinn Williams has some effective moments.

    Technical credits are smooth, but undistinguished. Like the script, the film editing tends to be flaccid, with scenes held too long and then faded out in a somewhat old-fashioned way that militates against the realism so vital to this story.

    Production values do not impress half as much as Twenty Thousand Years
  • Castle on the Hudson (1941)

    ** 1/2 (out of 4)

    Pretty much a scene-by-scene remake of the 1932 drama 20,000 YEARS IN SING SING has gangster Tommy Gordon (John Garfield) being sentenced to prison but he's not worried because he thinks his "connections" will get him out. Soon Tommy realizes that those on the outside want him to remain in prison so he thinks about escaping but the Warden (Pat O'Brien) tries to talk some sense into him. Spencer Tracy and Bette Davis were the stars of the original film, which is slightly better than this one thanks in large part to see the two legends working together. If you've seen that version then nothing here is going to come as a shock to you because I wouldn't be surprised if Warner just dusted off the previous screenplay and used it again, just changing names this time. That original film wasn't a classic so if you haven't seen it then you'll probably be caught up in the story plus we get Garfield turning in another winning performance. His character was too large of an ego and comes off as a major jerk but Garfield could always play these characters and in the end make you care about them. That's what pretty much happens here because after Tommy takes his beatings he finally comes to except prison life and how it actually is. Garfield is so believable in the part that you can't help but want to see him succeed in what he's doing no matter what he was convicted of. O'Brien plays his character countless times before in a number of Warner pictures. That heart of gold who takes in the bad and makes them see how good they could be. O'Brien and Garfield work extremely well together and they're certainly the main reason to check this film out. Ann Sheridan plays the girlfriend and isn't too bad in the part but the character is so poorly written that she becomes quite annoying due to how stupid she is. Burgess Meredith plays a fast-talking convict who tries to talk Garfield into escaping and Guinn Williams is the lovable lug head. Warner made a ton of gangster and prison pics and while this here isn't nearly the best, there are at least enough good moments to make it worth viewing but I'd still catch the original first.