User Reviews (234)

Add a Review

  • When the pianist Al Roberts gets tired of being miserable and missing his girlfriend who traveled across the country to seek her fortune in Hollywood, he decides to leave New York behind. He has no money to pay for the trip from one coast to the other, so he decides to hitchhike, something that proves to be his downfall. A man who picked him up dies during the journey and Al panics when he pessimistically expects to be accused of the death. He steals not only the man's car, but also his identity and stows away the corpse in a ditch. He then decides to pick up a hitchhiker named Vera, but he will soon regret it because she seems to know his dark secret and will not hesitate to take advantage of it.

    The story feels more than a little strained on more than one occasion. It's hard not to fall in love the hopelessness that constitutes Detour. A low-budget thriller directed by Edgar G. Ulmer. Sure, it's an extremely simple B-movie, but it is packed full of interesting quotes, friendly cynicism, pitch black darkness and at least as much rain. It is insanely entertaining to see Vera and Al throw sharp barbs at each other while the tones are so miserable that they find it hard to laugh at them.

    With a playing time of over 70 minutes says Detour goodbye long before it has time to start to feel tiring.
  • Or he is lying. The entire film is told in flashback as Al Roberts (Tom Neal) sits in a dingy diner. At the beginning of his story, Al is a piano player in a low rent club in New York and his best girl is the singer. But then she grows tired of their professional stagnation and decides to go out west and try to get into pictures. Al gets lonely, calls her, and says he is coming out there too. She enthusiastically embraces the idea. He has no car and so he hitchhikes. He gets all of the way to Arizona before his bad luck hits. By the film's end Al has implicated himself in two deaths that were accidents in both cases, but would be impossible to prove they were not murder, and is held prisoner by a dragon lady who wants to get him involved in a preposterous fraud scheme that he rightly decries as being impossible to pull off.

    The acting and much of the dialogue is very melodramatic, bordering upon soapy, but it fits the story as so much of it involves conveying the emotion and doing so from the point of view of Al. Bogart and Mitchum wouldn't have been right for this lead role. Either one of them would have come across as either too cool or too tough to put up with such a domineering femme fatale as Ann Savage's Vera and seem so depressed and pathetic. Instead, Tom Neal is perfect as a guy who sees himself bound by fate and doomed.

    But maybe the entirety of the story is made up. Al's voice over could just be him sitting in the cafe creating an alibi story. Ann Savage's performance as Vera was over the top maybe because it's Al telling the story, and he wants to make himself look good. I don't buy half of what he tells us; I think he was much more complicit in all of the deaths than he wants the audience to believe. Vera is a caricature of the noir femme fatale because he's trying to convince us that everything was her idea or an accident or fate based on his act of true love - trying to get to his girl in California - and he's completely innocent.

    On the technical side, this one showed a great use of light, shadows, and music, and fine direction by Ulmer to keep the mood. It's too bad nobody has restored this one as it resides in the public domain. This is one noir that will stay with you.
  • jotix10023 July 2005
    It's a tribute to Edgar Ulmer that "Detour", made for about thirty thousand dollars, still keeps an interest with new fans who discover it. According to some comments, "Detour" has not been seen in this country in quite a while, but we recall the first time we saw it when it was presented at New York's Film Forum as part of a Film Noir festival in the late eighties. The copy shown recently on TCM has a poor quality, while the print we saw at Film Forum was in better condition.

    What makes "Detour" a must see, is the clever way its narrative unfolds on the screen. Al and Sue are seen first in the small bistro he plays the piano and she sings, in Manhattan. Sue sings a happy rendition of "I Can't Believe You're in Love with Me", and Al shows he can improvise on a theme by Chopin as he jazzes it up. When Sue decides to pack it and move to L.A., Tom promises he'll follow. The tragic mistake he makes is to intent crossing the country hitchhiking. Even in the forties, it's a miracle he made it alive!

    In Arizona Al meets the kind Charles Haskell, who happens to be going all the way to L.A. and offers him a ride. The two men develop an easy friendship until the point when Haskell dies of an apparent heart attack. Al disposes of the body and keeps going, assuming now, Haskell's persona. At the nearest gas station he sees a pretty woman, Vera, who appears is hitchhiking, and offers her a ride. This will prove to be his biggest mistake.

    Vera turned out to be Al's worst nightmare. She knows Al is not Haskell since she, herself, knows the man. Al ends up a virtual prisoner hiding in the apartment they have rented in Hollywood. He can't escape. When Vera realizes there's a lot of money to be made by having Al pretend to impersonate the dead Haskell, he refuses. She threatens to call the police and he is left on the other room pulling the telephone cord...

    The film works because all the elements are in place in this satisfying 67 minutes work and because of the great performances Mr. Ulmer got out of Tom Neal and Ann Savage. Edmund MacDonald and Claudia Drake played Haskell and Sue.

    "Detour" was shot in two sets and it shows. It's a small film that doesn't pretend what it's not, and that's basically why audiences seem to like it as it's discovered.
  • Dear Me, PRC, the sub-Republic/Monogram indie studio that was considered the most cardboard of studios managed on this occasion to actually create a deliciously nasty noir. DETOUR, as many commentators here like to spoil for you by telling you THE WHOLE STORY is an excellent low budget film of one man's descent into accidental crime. So powerful are the screen images and the seedy tawdry drama that one almost forgets they are watching one of the cheapest (and profitable) films ever made. Monogram Pictures made several highly appreciated low end noirs (like the truly shocking DECOY of 1946) and must have been very envious of the now enduring $66,000 PRC masterpiece DETOUR. In fact I would not be surprised to find that Monogram were inspired enough to make DECOY as a result. Tom Neal sadly actually went to jail in real life in a genuine DETOUR like way and vicious Ann Savage lived up to her name in a few more noir shockers for various crummy B/W outfits who specialized until the mid 50s in similar films. NARROW MARGIN and KISS ME DEADLY are equals. DETOUR is one of the most rewarding grim descents into 40s desperation film making and the doomed loser played by Tom Neal certainly is the most tragic of them all. This is a great film. It is all it is meant to be and viewers who sit riveted to the unfolding emotional horror are genuinely rewarded. Originally TIFFANY STUDIOS in the 20s the lot became for hire after 1932 then was the home for GRAND NATIONAL from 1935 -39 and morphed into PRC in 1940. With a huge shed of snazzy 20s furniture and sets from the previous 15 years it allowed PRC's budget conscious front office to upgrade their art direction by virtue of all these classy fittings costumes bought and left there by the sophisticated view of those previous managements. I have seen a number of independent B grade30s pix made there with the same sets and outfittings inbetween management reincarnation. PRC in the late 40s were bought up by EAGLE-LION a US/Brit franchise headed by J Arthur Rank and rolled in 1950 into UNITED ARTISTS. As one journalist aptly wrote "No other poverty row outfit were able to cash in their chips so handsomely". Good on 'em! See DETOUR and gasp!!
  • blanche-214 August 2007
    "Detour" is a standout noir, made in 1945 for pennies, and starring Tom Neal, whose art was later imitated in his life when he was charged with murder. Neal is effective as a man who seems on the surface to be a victim of bad luck and poor judgment. Real bad luck and real poor judgment.

    Trying to get from New York to LA by hitchhiking so that he can be with his girlfriend, Al, a talented pianist, is picked up by a guy named Haskell, who, at some point during the ride, dies of we don't know what - probably heart failure. The guy kept taking pills of some sort - my guess is it's digitalis because if it were speed, he wouldn't have fallen asleep.

    At any rate, his death leaves Al with a dead body and a car. Feeling no one will believe his story, he hides the body, changes clothes with the victim, takes Haskell's driver's license and money, and leaves. First mistake. Surely an autopsy would have confirmed the man died of heart failure, number one; and number two, Al in his narration makes reference to the body falling out of the car when he opened the door, indicating that there would then be a bump on the head and he'd then be accused of hitting him. Uh, Al, I doubt it - the ground was wet and the guy was DEAD. But instead of driving to the nearest police station and explaining what happened, Al takes off.

    Later on, he picks up a hitchhiker named Vera. It turns out that she knows he isn't Haskell and uses her knowledge to get him to do what she wants to get more money. If it was downhill in the beginning, now the situation becomes a sheer drop.

    There is speculation by viewers that Al is a big fat liar and that his narration, which makes him look like a victim of chance, is skewed, that the facts don't fit his story and that his girlfriend Sue didn't exist. That is a very interesting way to look at this film, and that conjecture may be true. On the other hand, Al may just be a loser and the victim of bizarre circumstances.

    The whole film, and I saw a very grainy print of it, has a bizarre atmosphere. In the New York section, as Sue and Al walk through the streets, there's a fog machine going nuts, giving rise to the conjecture that Sue and Al's romance with her are just in his imagination. The character of Vera is frightening and pathological; one minute she wants to be treated like a woman by being complimented, and she comes on to Al, and the next, she's threatening him and acting like a shrew. More inconsistencies.

    The hard-looking Ann Savage is savage indeed in the role, which is by necessity a quite exaggerated portrayal. Handsome Tom Neal does a good job as Al, and his role includes a substantial narration throughout.

    Is this narration what really happened, or is it what he is planning to tell the police if caught? We don't know. The ending was tacked on at the last minute and frankly doesn't feel right. I like the idea of the ambiguity of the original ending, which matches the ambiguity of the story. The viewer does see this ending, but then it is followed up by another minute of film apparently demanded by the censors.

    With Neal's subsequent real-life violent actions and his ultimately being accused of murdering his wife, this film takes on some really macabre aspects. "Detour" will always remain perhaps the most unusual noir ever produced: made for no money, the strange circumstances of the story, a character who may or may not be lying to the audience, and a leading man who perhaps took his role too seriously. A striking film.
  • Is Detour just a bad dream? Or a masochistic reverie dredged up out of the sumps of self-loathing? Long before setting out on the road trip that took such a disastrous turn, Tom Neal was a picky eater at life's banquet. Pounding the ivories in a Manhattan nitery, he sulks that his talent goes unappreciated (when a drunk tips him a ten-spot, it's 'a piece of paper crawling with germs'). He sabotages his rapturous renditions of Chopin and Brahms waltzes with a left-handed boogie-woogie beat. When his girl, the club's shantoozie, tells him that he'll make it to Carnegie Hall 'someday,' he snaps back, 'Sure, as a janitor. Maybe I'll make my debut in the basement,' and 'Yeah, someday – if I don't get arthritis first.' Neal's lousy with what we now call issues.

    When his fiancée heads to Los Angeles to try for the lush life, he lets her go, then, suddenly lonesome, decides to hitch out to the coast. In Arizona, he thumbs a ride from a pill-popping driver (Edmund McDonald) with scratches on his wrist from tussling with a 'wild animal' – a woman he had picked up in Louisiana. When Neal takes over the wheel during a rainstorm, McDonald up and dies – and conks his head on a rock as he slumps out the passenger door. Looks bad. Since he casts himself as eternal victim, Neal, though blameless, guiltily drags the body into the desert and assumes its identity (along with car and wallet). Later, at a gas station, he offers a lift to another thumb-jockey (Ann Savage), even though she looks like she 'just got thrown off the crummiest freight train in the world.' (Does the phrase 'self-destructive' strike a familiar note?) In fact, she's none other than the beast who sank her claws into the deceased – and plans to make an even bigger feast out of Neal....

    The stubble on Neal's unshaved chin can't disguise his pouty, pretty-boy looks, and he proves just right as this callow, ill-starred loser (a better actor would have added superfluous dimensions). If he and his self-absorbed predicament start to wear a little thin, it ceases to matter when Savage arrives halfway through to give a performance that beggars all description. Owing either to Ulmer's or her own genius (or to exigent production values), her hard face stays stripped of glamor – when she does slap on the war paint, the effect is primitive, alarming, with eyebrows that looked slashed on with a stiletto under an unkempt riot of hair. She starts off slowly, until, supposedly dozing in the shotgun seat, her eyes fly open to size up and devour Neal. It's the most terrifying instant in Detour. From then on in, she's all shrew all the time, drunk or sober, intimidating or seductively manipulative. Thus Savage's Vera entered film history as the hardest-boiled of its femmes fatales. And Neal never knew what hit him.

    Insolently original – a classic in a class by itself – Detour is by no stretch of the imagination a conventional masterpiece (if masterpieces can be counted as conventional). It shows evidence of starting out to be something – a longer, more fully developed movie – quite different from what it ended up . Groundwork gets laid for developments that never come to pass. What seems to be intended as the plot's centerpiece – a scheme to pass Neal off as McDonald, the lost scion of a wealthy family – comes to nothing. As does Savage's ominous cough, a clue to her subsequent indifference ('I'm on my way anyhow') to that 'perfume Arizona hands out free to murderers.'

    Somewhere along the way, Detour ran out of time, or money, or film stock, and was cobbled together out of footage already in the can, with the aid of peculiar voice-overs (in the last-ditch manner of The Magnificent Ambersons or My Son John). Against all odds, it still worked, and remains one of the best known and most unforgettable titles in the film noir canon, a stunningly effective piece of work that manages to encapsulate, in 67 minutes, all the inchoate angst that informs the cycle. It may have been an accident, but it's the kind of accident you can't peel your eyes off of.

    When the noir cycle began to coalesce in the early 1940s, it looked like it was going to take the high road of starry, big-budget prestige productions (The Maltese Falcon, I Wake Up Screaming, The Glass Key, Laura, Double Indemnity, Mildred Pierce). Edgar G. Ulmer's Detour took the low road. A Poverty-Row production empty of box-office names, it was shot on a few cheap sets in a matter of days. But it sweated off a raw power that other alert film-makers working on the fringes of the industry were quick to emulate; the next few years would see Fall Guy, The Guilty, Suspense, Violence, I Wouldn't Be In Your Shoes, Decoy (the pick, along with Detour, of this particular litter) – all done with wannabes or has-beens in cast and crew, visually often ugly (the murky lighting more a matter of necessity than moody esthetic choice). It was often inspired movie-making on the most frayed of shoestring budgets.

    And yet, with a few exceptions, this second-feature slot was the niche into which film noir would settle until it ran its course in the late 1950s. Which raises a question: Without Detour paving the way for quick-and-dirty, sensational fodder to fill up double bills – B-movies that the suits in the front offices didn't much care about and so paid little attention to – would the noir cycle have been but a brief flash in the pan? Would it have stayed the passion only of a handful of French cineastes? Would it have amounted to a cycle at all? The debt owed to Detour may be greater than acknowledged.
  • I'm not as fond of DETOUR as some of the other reviewers on here, purely because I found it an entirely depressing viewing experience. It's one of the darkest film noirs out there, leaden with a dreadful atmosphere throughout, full of foreboding, darkness, and misery. And I guess those are the reasons why it's so well remembered.

    The film is directed by THE BLACK CAT director Edgar G. Ulmer in much the same way he would direct one of his horror pictures. Tom Neal makes for a rather unlikeable hero, trying desperate to hitch-hike from one end of the country to the other and coming unstuck when he falls in with a seemingly friendly driver. He takes a chance and thinks he's made it when in fact he's just about to meet Ann Savage's Vera.

    Savage is the stand-out feature of this film and I hated every element of her angry, vengeful, selfish character. She's the worst femme fatale I've ever seen, a noxious character utterly devoid of redeeming features, to the degree that I found the movie hard to watch whenever she was around (which is most of the time). I admit that I thought the climax was excellent given what's come previously, although the only thing I came away from this feeling was relief, relief that it was over.
  • When I got my first VCR in 1985, the two movies I immediately rented were "Baby Doll" and "Detour." I have revisited the former many times but it's been 20 years since I saw "Detour." I like it even better.

    It moves in a seamless manner. The narrator is drawn as we watch into further and further degradation.

    The movie has a beautiful look. I'm sure it's a cliché to note this but it resembles a Hopper painting. It also bears the trademarks of Edgar Ulmer's movies: Literate dialogue and classical movie, no matter how low the budget.

    Tom Neal is a mournful, appealing protagonist. He's weak, not really bad. Ann Savage, of course, is terrifying as Vera, the hitchhiker from everyone's worst nightmare.

    Al's descent from blonde soubrette Sue to consumptive, murderous Vera is terrifying. Yet, though it passes by us quickly, it is fully believable.

    "Detour" is a true work of art.
  • DKosty1239 January 2019
    Warning: Spoilers
    From the writer of the classic film noir -The Narrow Margin- is another noir that is good too. It is amazing how years after their release these noirs are getting more recognition than when they were released. This one is no exception.

    The first scene is a man in a diner getting upset by the song playing on the juke box. Then we go into a flashback of how he got there.

    A piano player man is in love with a torch light noir blonde singer he works with. The blonde insists she has to leave to go to California to follow her dreams, rather than staying with the man she claims she is in love with. So her man stays in New Jersey, and she goes west. Then he misses her and calls her and tlls her he is headed out to see her.

    The road on the way has some major detours. Death seems to be following this man who is in love on the whole trip, coming up with 2 dead bodies on the way to the reunion. The 2 dead bodies detour his entire life.
  • Al Roberts (Tom Neal) is a depressed NYC piano player whose girlfriend leaves him to try her luck in CA. He follows her by hitchhiking his way. He's picked up by a man who (inexplicably) dies while Al is driving. Naturally Al does everything wrong...like dumping the body and then picking up Vera (Ann Savage) a totally amoral woman. Then things barrel horribly out of control.

    You can quibble about plot points (a certain death is highly implausible) but this IS a masterpiece of the genre. It's one of the grimmest film noirs of its time. It was made by a poverty row studio (PRC) on no budget. Actually the lack of budget helps the story--everything appears dark and grim fitting the tone of the story. Also they had an excellent director (Edgar G. Ulmer) and a great script by Martin Goldsmith. Also Neal was very good as Roberts and Savage is exceptional as Vera (there's a scene where she explodes at Roberts in a car which is truly scary). It's also all wrapped up in a tight economical 69 minutes. This has deservedly been a cult movie for many years.

    Good luck finding a clear print with good sound.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Ann Savage gets my vote for the person I would least like to meet under any circumstances, much less as a hitchhiker at a desert gas station. Her character Vera in Edgar Ulmer's noir mind bender "Detour" sets a new standard for women of her disposition, those with a capital 'B'. The film builds intensity as it's protagonist Al Roberts (Tom Neal) finds himself in a nightmare world, if not of his own creation, then at least one in which he shares major complicity. His character's voice over narration reveals a tortured mind, feverishly painting himself into a corner from which there is no escape, until events spiral out of control and strand him in an emotional twilight zone.

    It would have been interesting to see how any number of scenarios might have played out given some of the film's set-ups, such as the dying millionaire or the mysterious coughing fits suffered by Vera. Instead, her manic manipulation of the spineless Roberts suggests only one sure outcome, that at some point this powder keg must detonate. One might have expected a more direct confrontation, though Vera's demise is ultimately suited to her own unique propensity for evil. Sorry, wrong number.

    "Detour" is a strangely disorienting movie, with a reputation that transcends it's modest origins. Even it's ending, which seems like the end of the road for Roberts, leaves enough left open to the imagination to suggest that perhaps he can work things out with just the right roll of the dice. But what about Haskell, what about his dying father, what about Vera's corpse at the rooming house, what about Sue? The movie leaves more loose ends than any other I've ever seen, and doesn't even seem to care. In that respect, it's a lot like Al Roberts at the end of his rope, with the viewer left to decide whether or not to kick out the chair.
  • mateox8 July 2004
    You can quibble about details, but it's hard to deny that this is a classic in its genre. Al Roberts (Tom Neal) makes a series of bad choices that bring him low. They're the choices of a not particularly bright young man under increasing pressure. Vera (Ann Savage) is the quintessential Bad Girl. Their repartee, indeed much of the dialogue throughout, is a big part of the attraction of this film. The plot, presented in flashback, barrels on relentlessly to its conclusion. The characterizations, dialogue, plot, photography--all contribute to make this taut, gritty film a must for film noir enthusiasts. My only real disappointment is with the rather abrupt end. On the whole, though, great fun.
  • SnoopyStyle12 March 2017
    Down and out Al Roberts (Tom Neal) recalls his life as a New York nightclub piano player. His singer girlfriend Sue Harvey (Claudia Drake) rejects his proposal and seeks fame in Hollywood. He follows her west but with no money, he is forced to hitchhike. He catches a ride in the desert from degenerate gambler Charles Haskell Jr. (Edmund MacDonald) on his way to L.A. Haskell dies and Roberts fears being blamed for a killing. He hides the body and takes his identity. Along the way, he picks up hitchhiker Vera (Ann Savage) who happens to have ridden with Haskell before. Soon, she has him wrapped around her finger.

    Ann Savage has a fitting name. She savages the wannabe player. She's a real man eater. This is a small budget film. It can be strip down and thread bare. Its core is a B-movie noir. It's pulpy melodrama. It's not always the most technically sound but Savage rocks and it's usually a compelling watch.
  • Detour, a 1945 low-budget Thriller and near-perfect example of Film Noir excellence, was severely marred by the scene-chewing antics of Ann Savage, who literally bulldozed her way through her part like a rabid bitch in heat.

    Detour lost significant points all on account of this wretched Savage wench. It was a good thing that her character wasn't present for the first half of this film, otherwise Detour would've been a total write-off in my books.

    But once Savage's presence was firmly established in Detour's last half hour, the story deteriorated at an alarming rate and became so unbearable to watch at times that I almost turned it off in pure disgust.

    Prior to Savage's savage entrance, Detour was an exceptionally intriguing Suspense/Drama about a honky-tonk pianist from NYC, named Al Roberts, whose life takes an unexpected and unpleasant U-Turn when he suddenly decides to hitch-hike out to Los Angeles in pursuit of his girlfriend (not Savage, thankfully).

    Murder, blackmail, and sheer desperation all await young Al Roberts as he travels along the road, heading in the direction of the land of milk and honey.

    Regardless of its low budget, Detour (filmed in black & white) obviously had excellent high-production values. And actor Tom Neal, as Al Roberts, was superb. I'd say that his performance was close to being on par with anything that I've ever seen from the likes of Robert Mitchum.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Detour" has a memorable plot that is memorable for all the wrong reasons...but is worth seeing as a period piece.

    Just to put this in perspective, I saw "Detour" and "Spider-baby" at a friend's house back-to-back one Saturday afternoon. And while "Spider-baby" is some kind of pop-art exploitation psycho grind-house milestone, this is the film that annoyed me so much that I wanted to grouse about it on IMDb. (This may tell readers more about me than I'd like to admit).

    I've seen movies by Ulmer that I've thought were enjoyable and well done, so I had hopes for "Detour". And there are some nice touches here and there. The creative team behind this movie made the absolute most of their budget in terms of scenery, music, cinematography, sound design, art direction etc.

    But my gripe with "Detour" is that the "hero" is such an idiot that it's hard to identify with him. I found myself yelling at Tom Neal's shabby little guy seemingly every 30 seconds: "Idiot! Why are you hitchhiking across the county to rejoin your girlfriend? Just work a couple more weeks, and then just ride a bus to Hollywood, instead of taking weeks and months to hitchhike there!" "Moron! Even back then, the police could do autopsies to discover the actual cause of death of your driver friend. 10 seconds in an morgue would absolve you of any wrong-doing....WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS????" "Dope! You can dump Vera anywhere along the highway on the way to California...just throw her out of the car and drive off without her, and assuming she ever actually makes it to California,who is ever going to believe her story when she has no proof other than hearsay? Just deny everything and you are golden!" Of course, it's entirely possible that Ulmer and the screenplay writer WANTED me to feel this way. Certainly Tom Neal plays the character as a weak willed schlub who deserves the audience's contempt and ridicule.(I am reasonably sure these were acting choices, not simple limitations).

    Wow...it's been three weeks since I've seen "Detour" and I'm still arguing with the screenplay in the back of my head. Maybe you'd like to do the same?
  • This is one of the all-time great examples of film noir. It can practically be used to define the genre: shadowy black and white cinematography; a star-crossed protagonist ("...fate sticks out a leg to trip you."); a femme fatale (the unforgettable Ann Savage as Vera); cynical voice-over narration; ambiguous morality. All these elements are brought together magnificently by director Edgar G. Ulmer, who incredibly made this movie in several days on a shoestring budget. His direction is so masterful that the low budget sets only add to the film. This is a great masterpiece and one of the marvels in film history.
  • The film concerns upon a drifter(Tom Neal) ,he wants gather together his girlfriend and with no money converts as hitchhiker .He's picked up by a strange driver and terrible events happen.Afterwards he offers a lift to ruthless femme fatal(Anne Savage),being accompanied for her the evil spark was struck and a raging torrents of emotion throw up that he can't control.

    This unusual picture is a screen's great masterpiece economically directed and plenty of mystery,thrill-loaded and matchless suspense.Awesome movie sometimes ironic and experimental with thoughtful plot thus the starring with off-voice is guided for passivity and gets involved in dark fatalism.It's a tough,terrific adventure in grand larceny that gets him deep in the roads and deeper in danger with a beguiling and tempestuous Anne Savage on the trail on a fortune in hot money.Classic B noir film without budget and unknown actors .Hollywood only gave to excellent director Edgar G.Ulmer for making ¨quickies¨ but he directed two magnificent noir films and competently constructed ,this one,and ¨Strange illusion¨(Story of a how a boy revealed the clue that led to solution of murder of his father exposing the infamy of the man worshipped by women who proved to be a monster of cruelty). This low budget tale is considered a cult movie and has been remade numerous times,even with starring's son,Tom Neal Jr(1992). The motion picture will like to classic moviegoers.
  • I saw Detour for the first time on TV when I was 7 or 8 years old in the mid 60's. It used to play quite often, and I never missed it. I used to have dreams about it when I was a kid, and make believe that I was on the run, and impersonating a millionaire's son.

    I lost track of the film until recently. I was flipping channels and came across it on TCM. I knew immediately it was my long lost film. I enjoyed it as much the other night at the age of 43, as I did at the age of 7. It is a true classic, and simply ageless.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Not "the greatest B movie ever made" - as one critic claims, but it has its moments. It is arguably unique for its time, but as film noirs go, it is pretty ordinary, following many noir conventions. Some of the rules of film noir:

    1) People are rotten, and women are the rottenest people. 2) Society lives by rule #1, so people always believe the worst about each other 3) At the bottom of every man's trouble is a very bad woman 4) People are weak and stupid, and men are the weakest and stupidest 5) Evil schemes never succeed. 6) Things are the worst when they look the best.

    Spoilers follow:

    Life has always been tough for Al Roberts, but he never realizes just how tough life can be until it's too late. His troubles begin when his girlfriend dumps him and heads for Hollywood to become a star. His first mistake is deciding to follow her. In his circumstances, the only way he can get to Hollywood is by hitch-hiking.

    He is picked up by a gambler who offers to take him all the way to California, and in appreciation he agrees to share the driving. Things are looking good (see rule #6), so we know this is where it starts to get interesting. And stupid.

    The gambler dies of natural causes (fortunately, he wasn't driving) and instead of calling the police, Al decides to rob him, bury him, and take his car, on the grounds that the police would never believe him if he told the truth. See rule #2 above.

    Although frightened that someone will find out his secret, and turn him into the police, Al nevertheless decides to pass the kindness of the driver who stopped for him onto someone else. So, he stops and picks up a hitch-hiker, a woman no less. See rule #1 and rule #4.

    This movie has one great moment that redeems all the craziness of its dysfunctional universe, and that is when Al - and the audience - realize that his passenger *knows* .. knows what happened to the gambler who gave him a ride. I won't spoil it for those who haven't seen it. I'll just say it's one of the best plot twists ever ..

    From this point forward, Al is under this woman's control. He dances to her tune, and she has all sorts of plans for him, most of which would not pass close legal scrutiny. See rules #3 and #4.

    There is another priceless moment in this movie that'll you'll miss if you blink. Al and Vera, the woman hitch-hiker, are in LA, and have rented an apartment. They make a liquor run for their supper, and after finishing the bottle, Vera announces "I'm going to bed" and puts her hand on Al's shoulder in an unmistakable "care-to-join-me?" gesture. Al's a wuss, but even he has enough spine to pass this invitation. See rules #1 and #3, though Al's response here belies rule #4.

    So, is Detour a good movie, or not? Yes, it's a good movie, but it is not a great one. What makes the movie special are the elements that cannot be described, only appreciated while watching the movie. For a non-existent budget and a six-day shooting schedule, Detour is a masterpiece. I can't imagine a better movie being made under similar trying circumstances.

    From All Movie Guide: "Directer Ulmer .. succeeds in creating a memorable, dark, nightmare world, uncaring, cynical and brutal. "

    I thought every part of the theatrical elements of this story were masterfully done. I love the amoral, fatalistic, decadent ambiance of film noir, and this movie certainly has that.

    But, the whole movie turns on a plot point that will not hold: Al thinks that no one would believe him if he told the truth about the man who gave him a ride. In a film noir universe, that may be true; in the real world, it is not, so I cannot buy into the movie experience at the most pivotal point of the story. For that reason, I can only rate Detour a 6 out of 10. Still, it is a remarkable movie given the circumstances under which it was produced.
  • dxia14 March 2004
    One recurrent thought passes through my mind as I watch "Detour." It is that I do not believe a single moment of its story-telling. It isn't because of the incredible coincidences or the bitter irony but because of the simple goodness of the main character. Characters in film noir are not role models or good people placed into bad circumstances. They are bad people who believe that they're good.

    The characters in "Double Indemnity," "Body Heat," or "The Talented Mr. Ripley" do not think of themselves as bad people. They believe they are forced into their crimes by the world, which is the essential difference between crime movies and noir. As pointed out by Roger Ebert: "the bad guys in crime movies know they're bad and want to be, while a noir hero thinks he's a good guy who has been ambushed by life."

    "Detour" is told through the central character, Al Roberts, who recalls his story as one made through impossible coincidences and horrible luck. But there is something not right about his story. The audience can pick out the incongruities and flaws as soon as they're told. Was Charles Haskell's death really the result of bad luck or simply a murderer trying to convince himself that it was? We wonder if it is possible that a person as innocent as Al says he is can be forced into such immoral activities. However, the explanation is quite clear. Al is retelling the story not as a true confession but as a man reviewing his defense to the police.

    Watching the movie, I was reminded of Tanazaki's "The Key," a novel in which the main character deliberately lies to the audience as a way of reaching the story's conclusion. We do not see a real conclusion to "Detour," but we sense that the police will find the same flaws in Al's story as we do. And that is not a fatal form of story-telling but a way of looking into the mind of a true noir character and seeing the darker depths of his soul. That is why film noir is so haunting and why this movie is so definitive in its genre.
  • Lejink28 August 2012
    A grimy, road-weary guy walks down a misty road late at night. He turns into a cheap diner and, in a foul mood, snaps at another guy for playing the wrong song on the jukebox. So what's eating him? Cue lengthy flash-back scene as he recounts his desperate tale of thwarted love and ambition, strange deaths, a femme-fatale (sort of) and generally just the worst luck imaginable. Yes, we're in the land of noir again and this short and bitter-sweet movie, despite its uneven construction and unlikely events nevertheless makes for a convincing genre-piece.

    Tom Neal stars as our Mr "If it wasn't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all" clip-joint pianist who loses his singer-girlfriend to the bright lights of Hollywood who then decides to follow her there but with no money, has to hitch-hike his way there all the way from New York. On the road he happens upon a generous guy about his own age who agrees to take him the last part of his long journey when fate takes a hand and the world's worst series of unfortunate events start to happen to him.

    As is usual with noir, a huge amount of disbelief has to be swallowed as unlucky and highly coincidental events engulf him, but this low-budget does what all good noirs must, create its own world of no-hope desperation leading up to the usual unhappy ending. For much of the film, we're left to watch Hoag scratch and fight with the mysterious young woman whom he casually picks up on the same road to L.A. And sparks certainly fly between them. These scenes are the dark heart of the movie and the suitably named Ann Savage really chows down as the heartless, driven, even deranged girl he tangles with.

    Yes, you could pick holes a mile wide in the exposition and the film could have been wrapped up in twenty minutes if he'd only gone to the police in the first place, but of course that was never an option. It all ends badly for everyone as it inevitably must. Strongly acted and atmospherically directed this is a good little-noir, certainly worth detouring your attention for its brief but telling 67 minutes running-time.
  • Two words - Ann Savage - make this film worth viewing....and owning, if you are a film noir collector.

    She is not a major player here. There is one lead actor (Tom Neal) and a few supporting ones in this ultra-low budget, amateurish-production values film. However, her character "Vera" has a place in film noir history as probably the nastiest woman to ever make an appearance in this genre.

    Savage is so brutal that her insults, put-downs and nasty demeanor just make you laugh out loud. If this was made today, I could the imagine the profanity spewing out of her. She shows you don't need that to get your points across.

    The movie, as a whole, is not as good as many critics would have you believe. Until Savage enters, it's so-so at best. Since it's only 68 minutes, one can endure some mediocre material which features a real loser-of-a-man until the femme fatale arrives. Neal's character is one of the ultimate downers on film and his life is just one big soap opera, at least if you listen to him moan about it. Without Ann, one viewing of this film would have been enough because Neal is just too much of a whining wimp to endure more than once.....but sweet little Vera saves the day, er film.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The power of an accidental, unplanned encounter -- it can ruin your life. This gritty film perfectly nails that danger that can destroy any one of us.

    Scruffy pianist Al Roberts (Tom Neal) is going nowhere in his career and decides to follow songster girlfriend Sue (Claudia Drake) to Hollywood. It seems a simple thing to hitch a ride out West. But this is the universe of film noir, where doom is always lurking and nothing is as it appears...

    Roberts gets picked up by a driver (Edmund MacDonald) who croaks on him, but our protagonist dares not call the cops -- "They'd laugh at the truth. I had my head in a noose!" When it looks like Roberts's luck can't get worse, he picks up a hitchhiker of his own, dominatrix Vera (Ann Savage), who quickly catches on and warns him that "there's a cute little gas chamber waiting for you."

    The crackling dialogue is one of the strengths of this film. What does Roberts say to himself upon receiving a tip at the piano bar? "A 10-spot. A piece of paper crawling with germs. It couldn't buy anything I wanted." Later, speaking long-distance to his lady love: "I'll be there if I have to travel by pogo stick." Unless fate has another plan for him, natch.

    I took a film-history class in which Robert Mitchum's "Out of the Past" was offered up as the archetypal film noir. However, that movie has some confusing plot twists and seems unnecessarily ornate. I think the far more straightforward "Detour" is a better choice for that honor.
  • sparklecat18 September 2003
    Take a road trip with "Detour", a heavy-hearted but enjoyable film noir that's tough to shake. Tom Neal wears a five o' clock shadow and a frown as the hapless fella whose life is shattered by a rough twist of fate and a no-good dame. All he wanted was to join his girl in Hollywood. Moody, shadowy, and sporting vintage noir dialogue, "Detour" is a must for genre fans.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Apparently, "Detour" follows closely the 1939 novel by Martin Goldsmith of the same title. Goldsmith also wrote the screenplay. The general plot idea is good for film noir, but this story played out on the screen is just too hokey. I watched this movie with no more inkling of what it was about than I got from its promos. Afterward, I read that this film has been preserved for posterity and has become something of a cult classic. I can't imagine why, in either case – unless it would be for the technique of voice over for an actor's thoughts. There are any number of other noir films that have superb plots, casts and productions.

    There are two things I noted of historical significance in this film. The first is the long distance telephone connections that used to take some time for coast-to-coast calls. The second is the border check stations in California. I can't think of another movie that shows this. For many years, people entering California were not allowed to bring fruits or vegetables in with them. Vehicles had to stop at road entry stations to answer questions, have their vehicles checked and discard any fruits or vegetables they had with them. The lines at these check stations could sometimes be quite long, and the check stations operated almost like passport stations between countries well into the 1960s. Today, California still has control stations, but many fruits and vegetables for personal consumption are allowed, and the process is much quicker. "Detour" shows Al entering California from Arizona at a highway checkpoint where there are no other vehicles in sight. Even in 1939, there would have been more traffic.

    The low budget, cheap shooting, and minor cast of "Detour" are emblematic of the story quality. And, that's just hokey, with one incongruity after another. The viewer is first drawn to the tone of Al Roberts (played by Tom Neal) as he ruminates over coffee in the roadside diner. The "poor me, life is tough" message sets the stage for the film. The guy's got a real chip on his shoulder. Then, a flashback takes us to New York where he's playing piano while the love of his life sings. That's Claudia Drake playing Sue Harvey. And, we're led to believe that he's a masterful pianist. But whoa – he's got the chip on his shoulder already. Times are tough, they're just scratching out a living playing in a cheap nightclub. Then Sue wants to go to California to try to break into movies. Enter incongruity. But not Al – he wants to make it playing in a concert at Carnegie Hall. He loves Sue and wishes her well in California. Any number of other movies show couples in love traveling West together.

    The incongruities begin to pile up. We see Al playing in the same nightclub. The patrons are sitting around tables like wooden dummies. Al plays a medley of virtuoso numbers on the piano. He gets a $10 tip from a client. It's a big one. That $10 in 1939 (the setting of the film) would be more than $175 in 2017 dollars. More incongruities. Apparently, wealthy people frequent the cheap nightclub. There are no scenes of Al trying out, pounding the pavement, or playing with an orchestra or in a concert hall. Love strikes again and he misses Sue. He calls her and sets out to join her in California. He hocked everything and has just enough money for food. But he can't afford a train or bus ticket? What did he do with all of his tips and pay – or was he living on the high hog? He could have saved enough for an $80 train fare from New York to L.A.

    Al was so preoccupied in his thoughts that he didn't pay attention to Charles Haskell Jr. (played by Edmund MacDonald) when he asked twice for Al to get his box of pills out of the glove box. He saw him take the pills, but he didn't think anything of it. Yet when he opens the door after he wasn't able to awaken Charles, he thinks Charles dies when he falls out of the car and hits his head on the ground. And the ground is wet and muddy from the rain. So, he doesn't have enough sense to realize that the guy had a heart problem, and the pills probably were strychnine. OK, so he was dumb in the ways of life. Then, instead of doing what normal people would have done – driven to the next place with a police station, he conjures up all sorts of "reasoning" of wrongdoing. He justifies in his mind what he's about to do.

    The incongruities continue throughout this film. The last big one being his pulling on the telephone cord under the door instead of yanking the cord out of the wall on his side of the door. Or did he think he could pull the phone through the door?

    No, the acting isn't that good. Ann Savage as Vera makes a good Bette Davis impersonation. But this plot in this film is so contrived and hokey that it's almost laughable.

    In real life, Tom Neal's personal story is more interesting than this movie, and much more like film noir. Neal came from a wealthy family and was a champion boxer in college. He attended Northwestern University and got a law degree from Harvard. He got mixed up with some underworld characters even as he started out in Hollywood. He severely beat up actor Franchot Tone. Two of his three wives died and he spent several years in prison for killing his third wife. He died of heart failure at age 58, less than a year after his release from prison.
An error has occured. Please try again.