Undercurrent (1946)

Approved   |    |  Drama, Film-Noir, Thriller


Undercurrent (1946) Poster

Middle-aged bride Ann Hamilton soon begins to suspect that her charming husband is really a psychotic who plans to murder her.


6.5/10
2,701


Videos


Photos

  • Robert Mitchum in Undercurrent (1946)
  • Katharine Hepburn in Undercurrent (1946)
  • Katharine Hepburn and Robert Mitchum in Undercurrent (1946)
  • 1509-1 Katharine Hepburn and Robert Mitchum in "Undercurrent" 1946 MGM
  • 1509-3 Director Vincente Minnelli and Katharine Hepburn "Undercurrent" 1946 MGM
  • Katharine Hepburn and Robert Taylor in Undercurrent (1946)

See all photos

Get More From IMDb

For an enhanced browsing experience, get the IMDb app on your smartphone or tablet.

Get the IMDb app

Reviews & Commentary

Add a Review


User Reviews


13 May 2012 | dougdoepke
Turgid Melodrama
The first half-hour is quite well done. Hepburn is excellent as the plain Jane whose brave exterior hides an aching heart. That the sleekly handsome Taylor would suddenly pay her attention is almost too good to be true. For the sheltered girl, it's a Cinderella dream come true. The Washington DC party scenes are particularly well done, just the sort of thing MGM was skilled at, and watching her keep up a brave façade among the snobs while hiding deep insecurity is particularly affecting. But then the movie goes into a dark psychological phase, and it's mainly downhill from then on.

There's nothing plausible about Ann's (Hepburn) obsession with a mysterious Michael (Mitchum), especially while she's married to Prince Charming Alan (Taylor). It's clearly a plot contrivance and a clumsy one, at that. And catch that sequence where Alan tries to kill Ann while they're on horseback. It's about as poorly staged and edited as any action sequence I've seen. In particular, the progression of backgrounds doesn't come close to matching, creating a rather surreal effect.

In my book, LB Mayer's MGM was the wrong studio to do this kind of dark material. Too bad Mayer didn't pass the story over to a budget outfit like Columbia or RKO. They would have turned out a fast efficient little noir, which is what the material is really suited for. The trouble here is that MGM casts two of its biggest celebrity stars in the lead. Hepburn and Taylor are fine performers, but their super-star status required lots of screen time, so the movie gets padded to an often redundant two hours, which doesn't help.

It's also an odd role for Mitchum given his later screen persona. Of course, it's still early in the tough guy's career, and a year away from his defining role as the noirish Jeff in Out of the Past (1947). Still, seeing him in a bland part that any number of lesser actors could have handled takes some getting used to. He's lucky he went from here to the eccentric RKO, while I'm wondering where his career would have gone had he stayed with glamorous MGM.

All in all, the melodrama itself is a turgid disappointment despite the first half-hour and the amount of talent involved.

Critic Reviews


Scary Good British Horror Movies to Keep You Up at Night

From Saint Maud to The Wicker Man we've rounded up some of our favorite British horror movies that are guaranteed to keep you looking over your shoulder for weeks to come. For even more, visit our Guide to Horror ... if you dare.

See the full gallery

Around The Web

 | 

Powered by ZergNet

More To Explore

Search on Amazon.com