It's Hard to Be Good (1948) User Reviews (8)

Obviously people enjoy being cantankerous.

[mark.waltz · 5/10 · 29 December 2021]

Having and traumatized by his time fighting in World War II, Jimmy Hanley comes home and decides that he's going to bring goodwill wherever he goes, and it makes him a pariah. That includes his family, his neighbors, strangers he encounters on the train and people he goes out of his way to contact. It's obvious that his do-gooder ways are considered interfering, although some of the people that he meets are just as bad or worse.

Standing by him, somewhat reluctantly at times, is his former nurse turned fiance, Anne Crawford, providing the toughness he needs to get over this obsession. He's often obnoxious in his efforts to make the world a better place, and it's hysterical to watch him fall on his behind when he fails or becomes a victim of a crowd tired of his meddling and often demanding nature, especially in his job as a journalist. Good supporting playets, a nice use of location footage and a sardonic nature in a cynical post war world aides this in being amusing, but it takes a lot for the hero to learn his lesson.

Pulls its punches...

[wilvram · 5/10 · 11 April 2020]

This meandering and misfiring comedy-drama with Jimmy Hanley as a war hero turned do-gooder, whose well-meaning intentions are exploited by corrupt councillors and a bullying newspaper proprietor, does contain seeds later to be developed in the satires of the Boulting Brothers, particularly in HEAVENS ABOVE. While Hanley becomes involved in any number of brawls, the script pulls its punches throughout. I'm a big fan of Anne Crawford, and her wit and glamour as Hanley's sympathetic wife are very welcome in the latter stages, while her closing line, beautifully delivered, is the best in the film.

It's Hard to Make a Good Movie

[boblipton · 5/10 · 18 July 2017]

Jimmy Hanley spends three years in hospital after injuries in the Second World War, with plenty of time to think about how to maintain peace. He decides that the first step is to be helpful and neighborly, but soon discovers It's Hard to Be Good. Everyone thinks him a nut.... until he is awarded the Victoria Cross, and suddenly he is listened to .... and used.

It's a hopeful little British comedy, with some heart in it, but its low-key MEET JOHN DOE story line makes it seem like an also-ran, despite several amusing incidents, and gorgeous Anne Crawford as his nurse and later wife. In the aftermath of the Second World War, the movie's earnest and mocking tone was not wanted; it was an era of Big Plans and National Efforts, and people didn't believe in its simple, grass-roots ideas... nor, seventy years later, do I. Still, it can be enjoyed for its innocent, middle class humor, if you're in the right mood.

Standard post-war British Movie

[Jox · 4/10 · 16 February 2001]

'It's Hard To Be Good' is fairly typical of British post-war cinema. It does pose some social comments/questions apt for the era, particularly regarding relationships between neighbours and family in a post-war context, and it also vaguely touches on the plight of returned service personnel (National Service was still in operation at the time). To do this, the film is in some ways quite critical of British society. It is difficult to place the work in any one particular genre, as there are elements from several, with the exception of 'action' or 'war'. The nearest description would be 'drama', but with a good element of 'romance'. The acting is standard fare and adequate, as is the plot. There are a few quite funny moments, that were probably quite advanced in concept at the time the film was made. Other than that, after sitting through a relatively unchallenging (but moderately entertaining) film, I was very disappointed with the ending. It seems as though none of the 'loose ends' were tied up for the audience, rather as if the funding ran out during filming. It just suddenly stops. Watch it only if you have nothing better to do, or if you are into social anthropology, cultural studies or sociology.

Ironic Title

[malcolmgsw · 4/10 · 20 April 2013]

Given that this is such a dull film it could be said that the title is rather ironic.The only aspect which is of interest is the fact that the character played by Jeremy Hanley is a VC.Befoe people are aware of his heroism in the war they are generally indifferent to him and his plans.When they become aware that he is a VC they suddenly take notice and he gets all sorts of propositions made to him.It is further irony that he learns that the ammunition truck that he was driving to safety when he won his medal,in fact was only carrying cameras.Whilst this film may have been topical at the time it was made,that has now faded away and left us with a rather lifeless film.

A limp and humourless film!

[geoffm60295 · 4/10 · 13 November 2020]

'It's hard to be amusing and interesting' and this film demonstrates that in spades! The theme is about post world war idealism, but in essence it's a real drag, with a lifeless script and a 'drippy' hero, played by the underwhelming Jimmy Hanley, who as Captain Wedge, comes comes across as a very naive and frankly dull individual who wants to make his mark upon the cynical world after emerging from the end of the war with a VC. Ann Crawford adds glamour and moments of light relief as Hanley's romantic interest, but even she is dragged down by a lame storyline and playing opposite her wooden leading man. I found Hanley's character a misguided bore, whose efforts to promote good works is constantly hampered by a hard bitten newspaper editor as well as local councillors. Hanley's idealism wears thin well before the end of the film and I for one believed he needed to swallow a large dose of realism, as well a kick up the rear, delivered by his wife, to bring him to his senses! British stalwarts like Geoffrey Keen and Joyce Carey were wasted in their supporting roles.

Its hard to be bad.

[morrison-dylan-fan · 8/10 · 14 January 2022]

After finding Terence Young's Rom-Com Woman Hater (1948-also reviewed) to not fizzle as much as I was hoping for,I decided to explore the film listings on Talking Pictures free online catch-up service. Standing out as a obscure title due to not having been released on disc, I got set to discover how hard it is to be good.

View on the film:

The last film he would direct for two years, (with the next being The Dark Man 1951-also reviewed) and coming out the same year that his wife Jill Craigie divorced him, with fellow film maker Craigie then getting married in 1949 to future Labour leader Michael Foot, the screenplay by writer/ director Jeffrey Dell takes a fascinating, strange glance at the post-war Britain landscape.

Leaving from the opening horrified by what he had seen on the battlefield, Dell sends Wedge (played with a hapless comedic charm by Jimmy Hanley) back home with a message of pacifism, with Wedge doing everything possible that things must change, from the cycle which led to war.

Instead of presenting the public as embracing Wedge's ideas for peace with open arms, he instead draws cynically comedic sketches of the locals, who react with brutal fury at every attempt made by Wedge, to show them that their is an alternative way things can be done.

Laying out the welcome parade for Wedge, cinematographer Laurie Friedman, (who was camera operator on the superb Odd Man Out 1947-also reviewed) stays perfectly in the strange cycle that director Dell sets out, via excellent, long complex crane shots going across the gardens and the workplaces where Wedge is attempting to spread his message to, that land on rough-edge broad comedy set-pieces of Wedge being beaten up Slap-Stick- style by the locals,as Wege finds out that it's hard to be good.

Cheerful and witty

[j-p-collins95 · 10/10 · 5 September 2021]

You can tell shortly into a film, I think, if it's going to be any good. I was taken by this one almost immediately. I found it clever. Surprisingly so. Thought I'd better make sure so gave it another 5-10 minutes. I like to check up on the film -- cast, etc., after I've come to my own assessment of it. I thought it was fabulous but when I came here I was shocked to say the least to see all awful reviews. So instead of the 8 I was going to give, I boosted it to 10. I'd actually watch it again soon, no hesitation.