User Reviews (12)

Add a Review

  • Toward the end of Republic Pictures existence with the demise of the B western and the departure of their number one asset John Wayne, the studio did produce some quality if low budget films. The Eternal Sea is one such film and the studio made good use of naval combat footage from World War II and Korea to integrate them into the story.

    Which is the true story of Admiral John Hoskins who lost a leg during the battle of Leyte Gulf, but fought to stay on in the Navy on active duty and doing more than desk duty. As the story unfolds Hoskins fought to have our aircraft carriers adapted to jet airplanes, a difficult task indeed because naval aviation itself was only slightly over 25 years old and just getting settled into propeller planes.

    Sterling Hayden plays the courageous and far seeing admiral Hawkins and Alexis Smith his supportive wife who would dearly like to see her man take an honorable retirement. Alexis Smith always had trouble getting cast because she was a tall girl, a first baseman as Bing Crosby said in Here Comes The Groom. No worries here because Sterling Hayden was 6'5" to Alexis's 5'9".

    Dean Jagger does a nice job in the role of Hayden's superior and mentor. The Eternal Sea is a real inspirational story and was worthy of a bigger studio and budget than Republic Pictures and the money allocated.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's late in World War II, the Battle of Leyte Gulf. The aircraft carrier USS Princeton is bombed. There is a secondary explosion that sinks the ship and costs Captain John M. Hoskins, Sterling Hayden, a leg. He's pretty bitter about it too because he was just about to take command of the Princeton. The Navy plans to retire him but Hoskins refuses. This troubles the Navy. It also troubles Hoskins' wife, Alexis Smith. She wants her sailor husband home. All Navy wives want their sailor husbands to stop thirsting for sea water, at least in John Wayne movies. However, she passes on some information to him that will save his career, sacrificing her own satisfaction for his sake. Not only that, but the Navy gives him command of the NEW USS Princeton and, in the years after World War II ends, it becomes his job to prepare the aircraft carrier to launch and receive Grumman jets.

    Hayden had a curious career. He was always half hearted about it. He was more interested in doing his own sailing than in acting, and most of his early films, like this one, were done by the numbers. He never made the Mount Rushmore of manliness like John Wayne or Robert Mitchum. His politics didn't help, even though he "named names", as the saying went. As an OSS operative during the war, he'd been inserted into Yugoslavia to help Tito organize the partisans against Hitler's troops, and in doing so picked up some ideas considered anathema at the time. In 1964 he managed to give a startling performance as a crazed Air Force general in "Dr. Strangelove," turning the maniac into an object of pathos.

    His wife, Alexis Smith, had fluorescent red hair and aquamarine eyes to die for. She looked regal. Canadian actresses look regal. They could all play queens -- except for Ruby Keeler who would have to be the naif from Nova Scotia whose royal heritage has only recently been discovered.

    You don't get to see the color of Smith's eyes in this movie because it's in black and white. It came from Republic Studios run by the notoriously cheap bonehead Herbert J. Yates, a man of little taste, whose idea of "art" had a dollar sign in front of it. Yates also shoehorned in his main squeeze, Vera Hruba Ralston, as a leading figure whenever possible. And he cheated John Ford out of some money connected with "The Quiet Man," and Ford never forgave John Wayne for getting him mixed up with Yates.

    However, mean though Yates may have been, this movie isn't shabby. It's not limited to one or two indoor sets. Nothing like that. It's a respectable production, though an inexpensive one. None of the combat scenes are staged. They're all taken from newsreel footage, which was still relatively new to audiences at the time. That is, we see Hayden and some other officer staring at something off screen and then the film cuts to a shot of an airplane landing or taking off. The Navy's Grumman Panthers were cool-looking aircraft as far as that goes. They no longer looked like rudimentary jets. They looked ready to fly at speed, though in fact they were no match for Soviet jets. I watched them practicing touch and go landings from a carrier in Monterey Bay, a thrilling experience.

    The writing and direction are strictly instrumental. There's not a jot of originality in either. Nor does a viewer learn any of the technical details about converting aircraft carriers to jets. And unless you know the differences between commanding a carrier and commanding a carrier division or a fleet, you may miss some of the steps upward taken by "the peg leg admiral." Hoskins was a real historical figure and quite a guy according to this movie -- flawless in fact. He was awarded the Navy Cross for his action in Korea. He also was awarded the following medals: Purple Heart, Legion of Merit, China Service Medal, Order of Military Merit, from the Philippine Government, the Philippine Liberation Medal, Atlantic Fleet Clasp, Asiatic Pacific Campaign Medal, plus others. He was still alive when the movie was made.
  • If a person looked to the movie poster to show them what the movie would be about, the one for "The Eternal Sea" would seriously mislead them. After all, you see the Rear Admiral (Sterling Hayden) locked in the arms of his wife (Alexis Smith). However, this movie isn't really a romance and the scene has little to do with this film.

    Instead of a romance, the film is about a career naval officer-- specifically from WWII until 1955. When the film starts, Captain Hoskins (Hayden) is desk-bound and longing to be back in command of a ship since the war is raging. However, when he finally gets a ship after years of waiting, he's severely injured even before he can take actual command of the ship...losing his lower leg in the process. But Hoskins was determined not to be retired and fought the Navy to remain on active duty. But the war ends and so far the film has given the audience little to understand why they made a movie about the guy. His post-WWII career turned out to be far more eventful as he championed jet aircraft on aircraft carriers and took the US fleet into the Korean War.

    Overall, this is a mildly interesting lower-budgeted bio-pic. Nothing great, nothing bad about the film...just a decent military film with only a reasonable amount of stock footage (a big plus).
  • I guess that John H Auer was the main war film provider for the studio; Republic Studio. Sterling Hayden brings much to this one, huge budget for this studio, but the result is not on the John Ford's style scale. Especially with the use of footage combat scenes. It's is tiring after a while. I watched it mainly for the presence of ASPHALT JUNGLE lead. I admit. It is bearable, but sometimes a bit long, boring. If you crave for war features, patriotic or not - and this one belongs to this category - you won't be deceived. Without Sterling Hayden, I am not sure I would have spent one hundred minutes of my life on this movie.
  • CinemaSerf14 November 2022
    This is another film that is really let down by it's title. One that suggests more of a swashbuckler - or a romance, at any rate - than a biopic of American Admiral Hoskins (Sterling Hayden) who was a pioneer of the use of jet aircraft from aircraft carriers. As it is, it's an OK depiction of the struggles of the man against the elements, technology, human frailty and government to get his ideas implemented. Hayden is a charm-free actor here, his dedication to his task is laudable, but cheerless and any semblance of romance with wife Sue (a rather prim Alexis Smith) left me cold. It does have oodles of wonderful original aerial photography to augment it, though - and that helps. Sadly, though, this is all as flat as the deck on the "USS Princeton".
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The always dependable Sterling Hayden give the memorable performance as the real life World War II ship's captain John Madison Hoskins who decides if he wants to remain on active duty after he loses a foot. He even becomes an admiral, getting his own ship, and proving himself to be a commanding officer even after the war is over. With the support of wife Alexis Smith and their children (an adorable threesome, steam in the opening moments of the film taking that somebody is trying to break into their house), Hayden goes on with his duties, dealing with glitches in newly created jets (one seen having a fiery crash), as well as with his barely noticeable disability, having been influenced as well by a young arm amputee, Ben Cooper, who wants to join him on his ship, having had enough of civilian life.

    This drama is really a series of events, not a plot of the story although the situation of the disability is presented with dignity and presents Hoskins as stubborn but devoted, tough but fair, and an all-around American hero. Hayden's performance is what really makes a film work, with fine support from Smith, Cooper, Hayden Rorke, Dean Jagger and Virginia Grey. It's a simple film with great military sequences, non-stop action yes it is rather a generic as far as war films go. Smith of course is strong and beautiful, but it would have been nice if her roles had been a bit more substantial. The film is satisfying nonetheless or the serious way it deals with military procedures during and after the war. Above average for a Republic film with a decent script, but I'm not sure that it was 100% necessary to be a film outside of showing how a disability doesn't have to stop someone from doing what they loved.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's nice to be in a consensus (well, almost!) for once. This is a dull war yarn about a captain who carries on with an artificial limb. It could have been exciting. It could have been moving. It could have been provocative. It could have been heart-warming. But despite the fact that it's a true story, it's not put across with drama, feeling and heart-warming power. Instead, it's just plain dreary. Even an opportunity for a great action sequence is nixed by having that scene take place almost entirely off-camera! Even the acting manages to be dull with Sterling Hayden ruggedly carrying on, while Alexis Smith plays the ever-loving wife with a strictly stiff upper-lip. She's not a real-life person but an animated statue, programmed to give all the approved, flag-waving reactions. Similarly boxed-in is Dean Jagger who is required to play the twinkling-eyed, superior officer friend of the family. And as for the direction: Usually John H. Auer is both interesting and creative. A man to watch – but not in this movie!
  • For John H. Auer, a triumph.

    A simple tale, yet profound.

    Of a real person, facing challenges.

    John Madison Hoskins, United States Navy, (1898-1964)

    For Sterling Hayden, as John Hoskins, a wonderful performance, as in all his films.

    Well supported by Alexis Smith as Mrs Hoskins.

    Dean Jagger adds another role to his illustrious career, as Thomas L. Semple.

    Ben Cooper as 'Zuggy' Zugbaum. Ben Cooper, never got the acclaim, for his various characterizations, I believe he deserved.

    Various costars, Virginia Grey, Hayden Rorke, Douglas Kennedy and Willis Bouchey give good support.

    Real naval personnel are portrayed.

    Such as Arthur Dewey Struble.

    And William F. 'Bull' Halsey.
  • muons19 August 2018
    This is a biopic about Admiral John Hoskins. The movie looks more like a war (or navy recruitment) propaganda than a drama. It's amazing Sterling Hayden can go through 1h 43 min with the same facial expression and wooden acting style. He portrayed the guy as a total jerk (maybe it was true...) I agreed more with his critics in the movie than himself. Especially his antics during the construction of new Princeton were terrible. If I were one of the engineers working on the dockyard I'd kill him. As for the directing, the narrative is pretty flat and devoid of tension. The war scenes are unimpressive and cursory. The only quasi-drama happens when he fights against those who want his retirement and is short-lived. The rest is a documentary style slow-paced storytelling. Perhaps, the only redeeming quality of the movie is its sporadic attempts for making a statement for the disabled.
  • This film could be called almost a purist biopic, but it is different from all other biopics in its carefully documentary character in a very restrained style of refinery making it rather classic in character and form. It simply tells the true story of the naval officer who by sheer stolid stubbornness rose to become one of the greatest and most important admirals of the US navy in the Korea war to finally step down voluntarily when he simply felt it the right thing to do as he saw other needs where he could make himself even more useful. The conclusion of the film is therefore the ultimate apotheos of a very constructive life.

    But the via crucis to that end is long and difficult, we see the casualties, the downing of carriers, the pioneer planes ending up in flames, the war is there in all its inhumanity and hell, but since it was there it had to be fought and won, and that's what keeps the admiral going even as he lies decrepit and hospitalized with threats of permanent retirement. This is an American parallel to Douglas Bader.

    It's a unique film in its singular discipline of sticking to the subject and aiming at the point throughout, and therefore it strikes home with a vengeance.
  • A reasonably prestigious production for Republic Pictures, well-photographed by John L. Russell (best remembered for shooting 'Psycho').

    The first of two films based by William Wister Haines on factual tales of the rehabilitation of a disabled ex-serviceman. Next came 'The Wings of Eagles', which John Wayne spent most of in traction. Here a dashing Sterling Hayden simply saunters into the Korean War walking with an occasional limp; his biggest struggle involving office politics rather than his disability.

    (The part being too brief and homely to interest President of Republic Herbert Yates' wife Vera Hruba Ralston, his loyal wife is instead played by Alexis Smith; a much more interesting actress as she got older but sadly by then largely lost to films.)
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This Republic Pictures military biopic has a lot of heart. The real-life Navy hero, whose life serves as the basis for the story, was a man who faced very difficult odds and overcame them. Any motion picture based on his life would inevitably be emotional and inspiring.

    Sterling Hayden who usually starred in westerns and crime flicks, was cast as John Hoskins. Hoskins was still alive when the film was produced. He attended the world premiere in Rhode Island with his wife Sue (played by Alexis Smith on screen).

    THE ETERNAL SEA has a lot to recommend it. Besides the two lead stars, who share wonderful chemistry, there are many excellent aerial sequences. The drama goes a bit deeper than the average war film, since Hoskins was disabled while on duty in 1944. He spent the last part of WWII in sick bay, learning how to use a prosthetic leg. As he convalesced and rehabilitated himself, he faced two choices.

    The first choice would have been to do what everyone, including his wife, wanted him to do. And that was, simply, to retire. He was only 46 at the time, and the only career he had ever known since age 23 was a career serving in the military. No, he couldn't leave all that behind. The second choice was, basically, not to quit... to stay in the service. Not surprisingly, as a man with his personal strength and ambition, he chose not to retire, but to continue active duty.

    We see his ongoing struggles adjusting to his handicap, as well as his determination to prove to others higher up that he's still fit to keep his job. There are some great scenes in the middle of the film where Sterling Hayden gives us glimpses into the man's physical and mental pain. Especially during a moment when he falls off some scaffolding on a ship, and then must get rid of the crutches before an important meeting.

    In some regards this is a drama about willpower. It is also a drama about defying the pity and sympathy of others, to prove that a handicap does not have to be debilitating. There's a line of dialogue which says, "I may have lost my foot, but I didn't lose my brain." I can imagine how gratifying it was for Hoskins and his wife to sit through the finished film, which conveys his important message of not giving up.

    In addition to the convincing action and motivational message, THE ETERNAL SEA succeeds because it shows the full aspects of a man's life. In a lot of these films, we see the wife at the beginning and at the end, so we know the guy has a family...but the wife is often surplus to the story. Here the filmmakers have done a nice job showing how a man's wife and family are connected to his job. Everything he experiences is communicated back to the wife and reflected through her.

    John Hoskins continued to work for the U. S. Navy for another two years after this movie was released. His life served as a positive example to other disabled veterans. And his story still inspires others every time someone watches THE ETERNAL SEA.