User Reviews (224)

Add a Review

  • Movies like "Kiss Me Deadly" are reassuring that there's more to each genre than meets the eye. "Kiss Me Deadly" is part hard-boiled detective story & part apocalyptic sci-fi horror film. The movie suspects its own plots and its conventions are ludicrous. The result is a highly inventive film with a ridiculous but highly enjoyable storyline and comically fascinating characters.

    The basic plot, loosely adapted from Mickey Spillane's bestselling novel,is: after private-eye Mike Hammer picks up a hitchhiker who is later murdered, he becomes determined to learn the truth about her death. Although the plot becomes more and more insane, it's highly interesting. There are no empty twists, as each one leads to something larger and more confounding.

    I've never had more fun with a film noir character than the aptly named character of Mike Hammer. He isn't intimidated by any man and denies the world's hottest women. If he holds the upper hand in a situation, he seems virtually impenetrable. This characteristic leads to the ever-prevalent theme in film noirs of men vs. women and their places in relationships and society.

    The film is a masterpiece of cinematography, exhibited in the disorienting camera angles and unique and unconventional compositions of Ernest Laszlo. In fact, Ernesto Laszlo's cinematography is so apt with the film's randomness that it made me giddy.

    One of the most distinctive aspects of Kiss Me Deadly is the outrageousness of its final few seconds: the movie doesn't conclude, it detonates. In the hands of the director Robert Aldrich, the film becomes a starting point for a delirious expression of 1950s anxiety and paranoia, starting with opening credits that run backwards and ending with an atomic explosion.
  • Man, I saw this movie for the first time a few years ago and I still don't know what to think about it. Ralph Meeker as a fascistic Mike Hammer, a crazy hitch-hiker, an opera fan and a box that can destroy the world. I dunno.

    From what I understand Alderitch (the director) hated Mikey Spillane's story (which was about a briefcase full of drugs or money or something else), thought Mike Hammer was an image of brutality and fascism and made a film that reflected it. He makes Hammer out to be some kind of sadist and makes the suitcase out be some kind of nuclear device. The movie turns from a simple detective story to some wierd-ass, sci-fi cold war parable.

    It's sort of like the X-Files meets film-noir PI, or something to that effect.

    All that being said, this is a GREAT film and is well worth watching by anyone who like apocalyptic film-noir (in fact, this may be the only film in that sub-genre). Anyone who is a fan of bizarre camera work, weird symbolism and a stranger storyline, should really check this out.

    Observe the many bizarre inconsistencies (clocks that jump ahead and back, screams that don't jibe right with the soundtrack, camera angles that jump mysteriously) and keep in mind that these were INTENDED! When you get a feel for this film and start noticing what the director was attempting to do with this bizarre film I think that you will enjoy it even more. Truly a unique piece of film making.
  • Robert Aldrich was a no-nonsense film director. When he undertook the direction of this film, little did he know it was going to become the extraordinary movie it turned out to be. The fame seems to have come by its discovery in France, as it usually is the case. Based on Mickey Spillane's novel and adapted by Al Bezzerides, the movie has an unique style and it's recommended viewing for fans of the film noir genre.

    Right from the start, the film gets our imagination as we watch a young woman running along a California highway. That sequence proved Mr. Aldrich's ability to convey the idea of a disturbed young woman that seems to have escaped from a mental institution. The plot complicates itself as Hammer learns that Christine, the young woman, has died. He decides to investigate, which is what he does best.

    Some excellent comments have been submitted to this forum, so we will not even try to expand in the action but will only emphasize in the tremendous visual style Mr. Aldrich added to the film, which seems to be its main attraction. For a fifty year old film, it still has a crisp look to it thanks to the impressive black and white cinematography of Ernest Lazlo, who had a keen eye to show us Hammer's world as he makes it come alive. The great musical score by Frank DeVol fits perfectly with the atmosphere of the L.A. of the fifties.

    Ralph Meeker made an excellent contribution as Mike Hammer. He dominates the film with his presence. Albert Decker, Paul Stewart, Miriam Carr, Maxine Cooper, Fortuno Bonanova, and especially Cloris Leachman, in her screen debut, make this film the favorite it has become.

    Fans of the genre can thank Mr. Aldrich for making a film that didn't pretend to be anything, yet has stayed as a favorite all these years.
  • No need to recap the plot (even if I could) or echo some of the more obvious details.

    Notice how no one stops to help poor Christina as she runs down the street frantically at movie's opening. Instead cars whiz by, until Hammer almost wrecks his snazzy car trying to avoid her. In fact, there's not an overload of compassion anywhere in this brutal noir classic.

    As I recall, critics of the time reviled it for the unremitting violence and lack of heroics. At the same time, in years of movie watching, I've never heard screams of pain (e.g. Christina, Sugar Smallhouse) so convincing as here. They're almost too much to bear, which was likely Aldrich's intent. Add to the package a scummy, narcissist PI like Hammer, and you've got a melodrama unlike audiences of the time were prepared for. No wonder the movie bombed. (Two previous Hammer films had also disappointed Spillane fans-- I, The Jury {1953}, The Long Wait {1954})

    Except this movie was years ahead of its time in both style and content. Sure, the plot doesn't make much sense. There are threads, but they never seem to come together in coherent fashion. Instead, the money hungry Hammer keeps thrashing around in the dark like there's got to be a big payoff somewhere in the tangle he's got himself into. Self-assured to the hilt, he's not one for self-doubt or moments of contemplation. Instead, he bulls his way through every situation, heedless of what he's getting into. I expect folks looking for deeper meanings find plenty of grist with this. Then too, it's hard to say enough about actor Meeker's spot-on portrayal. His Hammer amounts to a guy you neither like nor dislike, but can't help watching anyway (his physical resemblance to Brando is almost astonishing).

    The visual style here is almost equally astonishing. Noir b&w has never been photographed (Earnest Laszlo) more effectively than some of those night scenes (e.g. the brutal fist fight between Hammer and his attacker {Paul Richards}), plus the long, dark hallways and staircases that suggest an enclosed world without redemption. Then too, the exploding beach house is well done, though it goes through 4 or 5 increasingly violent blasts, making Aldrich's apocalyptic point, I guess.

    But it's not just Hammer and the thugs he's surrounded with. The women we see may be lovely or even beautiful (Carr), but none are to be trusted. Not even Hammer's Velda (Cooper), who, when you think about it, is his willing partner in the scummy infidelity scams that are his bread and butter. How many husbands, for example, has she seduced into grounds for divorce. It's not obvious, but there's a misogynistic undercurrent running through the narrative, which, I guess, is appropriate for the movie's generally nihilistic attitude. (Note how oblivious Hammer is to the grandeur of the classical music around him that keeps popping up in the screenplay. None of that sublime stuff for him.)

    No doubt about it, the movie may retain the raw violence and sex that made author Spillane's potboilers so popular in the 50's. But crucially there's no one to root for here, not even the Hammer of Spillane's Cold War novels who kills commies on sight. No, Aldrich's and screenwriter Bezzerides world is not divided into good and evil, in the way that Spillane's brutal Hammer is redeemed by fighting on the good, patriotic side. Instead, the Aldrich world comes across as a nihilistic one, without enduring values, one that can only be redeemed by apocalypse, nuclear style. No wonder the French glommed onto the film immediately. I'm sure those pessimistic themes fit perfectly with the existentialist topics then so popular among their artistic class.

    Anyhow, however you choose to take the 100-minutes—as a betrayal of the novels or as a somewhat profound gloss on the human condition-- the movie remains a memorable one-of- a-kind.
  • Sleazy, tawdry B-noir doesn't get any sleazier or tawdrier than Robert Aldrich's jazzy and astonishingly entertaining "Kiss Me Deadly." This film was released late in the life cycle of the film noir genre. By 1958 and Orson Welles' "Touch of Evil," true noir would be just about washed up. Any noir film from that point forward would be self-consciously aware that it was tipping its hat to an established genre. But "Deadly" came out when films still didn't have to work at being noirish---they just WERE, and dazzlingly so.

    Born-to-play-a-bully Ralph Meeker plays tough-guy detective Mike Hammer, who's in the wrong place at the wrong time and picks up a mysterious panic-stricken girl (Cloris Leachman), who's just escaped from an asylum. From that moment forward, he finds himself tangled up in a barely lucid plot, in which a bunch of baddies want to get their hands on something the girl either had or knew about. Hammer doesn't know what it is, but he knows that if so many people want it, it's something he probably wants too, and the race for the great "whatsit" is on.

    If you wanted to teach a film class about the look and attitude of a film noir, you couldn't pick a better film than this one. I found myself on a recent viewing of this film pausing my DVD player and studying the frame (because, sadly, this is what I do in my spare time), rehearsing in my mind what I would tell a class about any particular composition. And aside from the style, the film is steeped in noir sentiment--it's not simply cynical, like the glossier studio noirs of the 40's; it's downright apocryphal. It's not simply one man undone by the vengeful forces of fate here, but an entire civilization on the brink of extinction.

    So pop this in and have a great time with it--feel free to quote it liberally, as there are plenty of juicy lines worth quoting. But as you watch it, you might want to stay away from the windows, for as Mike Hammer's hot-to-trot sometime girlfriend, sometime secretary Velda says, someone may "blow you a kiss."

    Grade: A+
  • Kiss Me Deadly is an absolute joy to watch. There are no big-name stars, the director has never been mentioned in the same breath as a Hitchcock or Huston, and it's basically a simple Mickey Spillane story. How its presented on the screen is the genius of the picture. Right from the opening credit sequence, you know you're in for something fresh and innovative. This is a must see for fans of Quentin Tarantino, and there is a curious box containing a certain substance that glows when opened (Pulp Fiction, anyone?). It is one of the finest of the "film noir" genre, predominantly because of the moody black and white photography and its amazing 'timeless' appeal (I would rank it alongside Touch of Evil). It's great to know the film has been "rediscovered", and be sure to see a copy of the film containing 2 different versions of the mind-boggling final sequence shot at the time.
  • "Kiss Me Deadly" had few similarities with Spillane's story about a gang of dope traffickers… Instead Aldrich reworks the plot so that the criminals are mixed up in the theft of priceless and high1y dangerous radioactive material which they are planning to smuggle to an unnamed power… The complicated story begins with Hammer picking up a scared girl on a lonely road at night and continues through the girl's subsequent death, a kidnapping and a series of very brutal killings…

    Spillane's Mike Hammer remains the ultimate in violent private eyes… The killings seem to matter less than the sadism… One scene in which Hammer deliberately breaks the irreplaceable records of an Italian opera lover in order to get the information he wants is more repellent than any of the murders in the film…

    Furious but stylish, "Kiss Me Deadly" is a film of great power and stays unique for its mixing of art and pulp fiction
  • A doomed female hitchhiker (Cloris Leachman) pulls Mike Hammer (Ralph Meeker) into a deadly whirlpool of intrigue, revolving around a mysterious "great whatsit." The film withstood scrutiny from the Kefauver Commission (who investigated the mafia), which called it a film designed to ruin young viewers, leading director Aldrich to protest the Commission's conclusions. Today, the film is preserved by the Library of Congress. We can see who won in the long run.

    "Kiss Me Deadly" remains one of the great time capsules of Los Angeles and Beverly Hills; the Bunker Hill locations were all destroyed when the downtown neighborhood was razed in the late 1960s.

    Homage is paid to the glowing suitcase MacGuffin in the 1984 cult film "Repo Man", the film "Ronin", and in Tarantino's film "Pulp Fiction". The "shiny blue suitcase" is referenced with other famous MacGuffins in "Guardians of the Galaxy". In the film "Southland Tales", Richard Kelly pays homage to the film, showing the main characters watching the beginning on their television and later the opening of the case is shown on screens on board the mega-Zeppelin.

    This is, indeed, the greatest of all private eye stories and film noir. With all due respect to such greats as "Asphalt Jungle", this is the real deal.
  • This late entry into the film noir genre has some harsh and memorable scenes and an ending unlike any other film noir. Of course, most of those weren't made during the A-Bomb scares of the mid 1950s, as this was.

    The movie features a tough, no-nonsense Mike Hammer-like private eye, played well by Ralph Meeker, whose tough-guy dialog is a little dated but still fun to hear. This is one of those noirs in which everyone is a tough-talking, tough-acting mug and one never knows who to trust. Except for Cloris Leachman, who is only in the first quick (but haunting) opening scene, the females in here are unfamiliar actresses but people with interesting faces and personalities.

    That opening with Leachman is a real attention-grabber and is one of the best starts I've ever seen in a crime movie. It's very creepy, as is the unique ending. I also appreciated the cinematography in here a lot more once the DVD was issued.
  • First-rate Mickey Spillane adaptation, easily the best film version of any of his novels that I've seen. Private eye Mike Hammer (Ralph Meeker) investigates the reasons behind the death of a hitchhiker (Cloris Leachman in her film debut). It's a gritty, tough, violent noir with some good dialogue and morally grey (at best) characters. Meeker's the perfect Hammer. Albert Dekker has a small but important part. The rest of the cast is good except for Nick Dennis, who goes full Eli Wallach in his role as Hammer's mechanic friend. Robert Aldrich directs with style. The ending is pretty cool, but it's definitely one of those "love it or hate it" things. It's certainly memorable, which I think most of us can agree is part of what makes any film great.
  • By 1950s standards this film is totally cutting edge. Just off the top of my head here is a list of things in this film that were VERY uncommon in the 50s: 1. African-Americans and non-Americans in several supporting roles 2. Main character has an answering machine (yes it's a giant wall-mounted reel-to-reel, but still..) 3. Location shooting (lots of exteriors and cool cars) 4. Risqué shots of bare legs, sexy actions by female characters, etc. It's implied the characters have a sex life (in most 1950s movies no one had sex EVER). 5. Violence - OK - there is no GRAPHIC violence, but lots of implied violence. Some of the camera angles are quite modern and unusual (punches into the camera, walking into camera to end scene, female character stepping over male characters outstretched legs, etc.) Censorship of EVERYTHING was the norm in the 50s. I don't know how this one made it past the censors but I'm glad it did - it's a quirky gem for film noir fans LK
  • On a lonely stretch of road Mickey Spillane's famous private detective Mike Hammer picks up a dazed and confused Cloris Leachman in her big screen debut, trying to thumb a ride. He picks her up, but shortly afterward they're both attacked and he's left unconscious and she's dead.

    Ralph Meeker as Mike Hammer wants to find out why of course, a reaction similar to the one Dick Powell as Philip Marlowe had in Murder My Sweet when something exactly like this occurred. But Powell didn't have not only the local police, but the FBI snooping around in this apparent street crime.

    Meeker's motives are not noble, he smells a big pay day. And while he's honest, he's not squeamish in the slightest about how he gets information. He runs into a variety of movie bad guys like Paul Richards, Strother Martin, Jack Lambert, Paul Stewart, and Albert Dekker.

    Some are helpful, some are not. The bodies start to pile up and what this is all about is a McGuffin to end all McGuffins. Let's just say the police in the person of Wesley Addy and the FBI had very good reason to tell Meeker to butt out. In fact his very entrance into the case causes a lot of fatalities.

    This turned out to be Ralph Meeker's career role. Perhaps had Meeker come along earlier or had gotten better breaks he could have had a great career in noir type films. As it was he became a respected character actor. Another performance you'll like is that of Nick Dennis who's a garage mechanic and part time leg man for Hammer.

    Juano Hernandez has an interesting part as well. He's a fight manager and not above taking a dishonest dollar if he can turn one. He's a reliable tipster, but the well runs dry about this case when Meeker questions him.

    But the performance really to watch is that of Gaby Rodgers who is a femme fatale to beat all. She makes Mary Astor in The Maltese Falcon and Claire Trevor in Murder My Sweet look like Girl Scouts. Watch the ending, it's so incredibly surreal it will stay with you forever.

    Can't tell you what the McGuffin is, it will give it all away. But it will be worth your while to see Kiss Me Deadly to find out.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Kiss Me Deadly starts out better than virtually any movie made in the 1950's--- Cloris Leachman is running down a deserted street barefoot in a trench coat and nearly creamed by Mike Hammer in his Jaguar. Then the film descends into a series of hits and misses--- the raw noir look is the glue that holds an increasingly audaciously convoluted plot together. Spillane's plot is on par with the worst Ramond Chandler film adaptation, so all you can do is watch it with your brain disengaged. That said, it has several nice touches: I love Hammer's ability to slide into some of the most awesome cars available in 1955 (the wrecked--ouch!-- Jag is swapped out for a ultra-cool black Corvette). The under-rated Ralph Meeker (examine his range in Paths of Glory; the guy could act) just might be the prototypical Mike Hammer... bitch slapping virtually anyone at the slightest provocation. Watch Hammer's face: this guy enjoys violence. He also takes an unbelievable amount of abuse in the course of the movie, getting beat up, shot and irradiated (!). Kiss Me Deadly ultimately falls apart from the crazy plot but earns points for it's sheer outrageousness. Watch it for how wild 1950's film noir can get, logical or not.
  • helleberg16 August 2004
    Warning: Spoilers
    I don't know whether the blame for this ought to rest on Spillane, Bezzerides, or Aldrich. Doesn't matter, there's more than enough to go around. It's unfortunate that this movie was "rediscovered" (I use the term with hesitation because I don't think it was ever discovered in the first place. Released, yes. Discovered, not quite) but even more unfortunate that it's received such a glut of critical attention lately. One of the "virtues" critics have been pointing out in this flick is what a great job it does capturing the "soullessness" and "spiritual vacancy" of 50s Southern California. One writer went so far as to liken Meeker to "Marlon Brando with the soul burned out of him." The problem is that the movie doesn't depict a soulless Los Angeles, but that it tries to depict a vibrant and lively LA and does so ineptly. Nick, the mechanic; the elderly Italian porter who gives Hammer a clue; the opera singing informant; the boxing manager; to a lesser extent, Velda, all these characters are lively and engaging and suggest a real humanity against this "soulless" backdrop. However, Ralph Meeker makes Mike Hammer about as interesting as a bag of doorknobs (betcha thought I was going to say hammers). The women characters are painted very shallowly and with trademark Spillane misogyny. I gotta say, I don't know exactly what that's about.

    These are broad complaints with the film. I've got a few very specific gripes, but they involve plot points, so be aware of spoilers below.

    First, the movie telegraphs just about every major event rather stiffly. Two seconds after Christina, the asylum escapee, says "If we don't make it to the bus stop . . ." viola, they are waylaid and don't make it to the bus stop. Every time the plot needs a forward push, Velda shows up and says "I got a few more names." Very convenient, very wooden, very unsatisfying.

    The dialogue is not stylized, it's unnatural. I would say that the delivery is bad, but I don't think this script could have been read well by anybody, which is to say Meeker and Cooper are not up to the task. I think one of the lowest moments comes at the end, when Dr. Soberin is warning Lily about the atomic pinata. In four lines, he piles on the allusion like cold cuts and mixes his metaphors like oil and vinegar to sprinkle on this ugly submarine sandwich of a scene. "What's in the box?" says Lily. "It's like Pandora's box," says the doctor. "You're like Pandora. Don't you know the story of Lot's wife? Please don't open the box, there's a Medusa's head in there. I'm barking like the three heads of Cerberus at the gates of hell." Well, maybe not that bad, but you can check the memorable quotes link for the terrible transcript. A smart mystery writer would limit the allusion to the one significant reference rather than trying to impress with the ridiculous repetition (Robert Parker titles one Spencer mystery "The Widening Gyre," then makes no further reference to this allusion throughout the two-fifty pages that follow).

    A final complaint is that there obviously wasn't much research done by Spillane or Bezzerides. Having the good cop Pat explain the entire atomic dilemma simply by saying "Manhattan Project. Los Alamos. Trinity," really sums up the problem. Rather than devising a clear plot, the writers opted to throw around a few atomic age buzzwords that seem to say something while saying very, very little. And then we end up with an image of the Malibu beach house exploding in the 1950s equivalent of a dirty bomb while a gut-shot Hammer clings to Velda in the waves. What is the parallel here? That the hardboiled Hammer will walk off his injury just as the fallout will roll off the back of this soulless Los Angeles?

    Idiotic. Reforget this rediscovered tripe and go rent "Out of the Past."
  • 'Kiss Me Deadly' is an overlooked crime gem that has proved to be a major influence on subsequent film makers from the French New Wave to cult classics 'Repo Man' and 'Pulp Fiction'. It's a movie which gets better and better with age. Director Robert Aldrich manages to put lots of style and interesting touches which sometimes border on the surreal into this toughest of tough guy movies. Ralph Meeker ('Paths Of Glory', 'The Dirty Dozen', 'The Anderson Tapes') is well cast as Mickey Spillane's Mike Hammer. Meeker's Hammer is brutal and his performance really makes this one work. The supporting cast are all very good too, especially Albert Dekker ('The Wild Bunch') as Dr Soberin and Maxine Cooper as Hammer's "assistant" Velda. Also keep an eye out for the debut of Cloris Leachman is the striking opening sequence. The "great whatsit" which Hammer searches for is one of the great movie gimmicks, and the ending will blow you away - literally. I loved this movie from beginning to end. I think it ranks alongside 'Out Of The Past' (Tourneur), 'The Asphalt Jungle' (Huston), 'Double Indemnity' (Wilder), 'The Killing' (Kubrick) and 'The Killers (Siegel)' as one of the greatest and most influential American crime movies, and I'm sure Scorcese and Tarantino would be the first to agree. Highly recommended.
  • pdeany123415 December 2006
    Warning: Spoilers
    Completely surreal and over the top -- the hardest of hard boiled containing every significant marker of this quintessential American genre. Outrageously odd characters and unrelenting cruelty. Meeker is calm, controlled and absolutely deadly, Velma oozes sexuality underscored by a wary cynicism, and Lily is fey, crazy and scary. Every character entertains, crazy quirkiness is rampant and nobody escapes final judgment. The film was astoundingly violent for the mid-fifties and it's psychological cruelty still stuns today. In the end, the cool cynicism and world weariness which marks this genre explodes quite literally and pulls noir out of the darkness into the atomic age.
  • Kiss Me Deadly (1955) : Brief Review -

    A nihilist film noir set in the backdrop of the Manhattan Project goofs itself with too many red-hot kisses. The film noir genre was at its peak in the 1950s, and everyone wanted to add something extra to the crime noirs of those days. Kiss Me Deadly took its title very seriously, I guess. The film follows a private investigator in Los Angeles who becomes embroiled in a complex mystery after picking up a female hitchhiker. Hungry after something big, he investigates her death and finds himself in troublesome surroundings, which also cause harm to his close ones, such as his girlfriend and a mechanic friend. Like I said and as its title suggests, the film has so many kisses. I won't call them red because it was a black-and-white film, but you smell what I mean. I couldn't understand why there were so many kisses. Every time he meets his girlfriend, she starts kissing him, be it during exercise, in the bedroom, or during a formal meeting. Then he meets Lily, and there are more kisses. The height of it comes when he goes to Evello's house, and before he gets out of his car, Evello's sister starts kissing him within a short meeting of 2 seconds. Kisses were so easy those days, man. Anyways, coming to the screenplay, I found it a little less thrilling than what other critics have called. The performances were okay, though. Ralph Meeker, Albert Dekker, Paul Stewart, Juano Hernandez, Wesley Addy, and debutants Maxine Cooper and Cloris Leachman-nobody looked off track. I have failed to understand Robert Aldrich's vision here. What was he really trying to say? If the same man has made a classic like "Whatever Happened to Baby Jane," then I can't understand how he can have a vague perspective towards his content. There are some moments that are worthy, but not the entire film. Still, a one-time watch for its thrilling and lustful attempt at film noir with contemporary effects.

    RATING - 6/10*

    By - #samthebestest.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Great movies can be made cheaply if they have good stories, casts and everything jells. This movie is an example. I would disagree with a previous comment that Robert Aldrich was an unknown Director. This was his first movie as a Director, but he was was on the fast track to becoming one of the best.

    Ralph Meeker who plays the lead, was never in the first tier of leading men, but personally one of my favorite "wise guys" who could compete with Bogart's Sam Spade.

    Meeker was physically more intimidating than Bogar tor any of the other tough guys of the film noire era with the exception of Robert Mitchum. Meeker was not one dimensional. In Paths of Glory, Kirk Douglas defends an innocent enlisted man picked to die as an "example" to maintain discipline. It was Meeker's role in this great film that convinced me that he deserved greater critical acclaim.

    Meeker is a perfect Micky Spillane. He's tough, irreverent, and a convincingly shady character out for number one, who uses his girlfriend/secretary in his private eye business like a pimp uses a prostitute. Alas movie fans, the heart of the private eye business is the divorce industry. Tawdry, boring and predictable, its a wonder so many films have glamourized the business. The exceptional facet of this film is the use of nuclear device as the object of everyone's affection. I believe its a first. Today's viewers may be a little jaded on that subject, but when this movie was first shown, it was a novelty. Today's viewer will have to excuse Spillanes's ignorance. Money, drugs jewels and possibly blackmail material could be hidden in a box, but after the Atom Bomb, detectives had to add nuclear material to their inventory. Ralph Dekker who plays Spillane's ultimate enemy plays a small part unless you count his blue suede shoes. ( I wonder if that was the incentive for Elvis's first hits?) Dekker was in a lot of films, usually as a bad guy with a lot of first line actors like John Wayne and Burt Lancaster. Gloris Leachman plays the opening of the movie and her career. Their are several other notable character actors with familiar faces but forgetful names who add color to this colorful movie in black and white shot in 6 weeks.

    If you enjoy action-adventure without political messages, watch this movie. If you want to see what men in the 50's wanted to drive, watch this movie. And just to show us that Spillane has a heart, you can watch him save his girl after being shot by a .38. What a tough guy!
  • The opening shows massive potential, and hints of brilliance, but is sullied by poor execution.

    This teeter of brilliance goes on throughout the film.

    An idea is introduced with clever editing, framing, and lighting. Then it derails, mostly because of the dated writing. But also by the same qualities that make it so great!

    The story involves a woman that escapes from an asylum and stops a car on the highway for the driver to pick her up. Then the opening credits roll as you listen to this mysterious woman cry hysterically in the now-driving vehicle.

    In theory, that is a very thrilling way to open a film with. But the folly, performance, and editing squander this massive potential, losing that build-up for what is being set up for an intriguing plot to unfold.

    Without spoiling too much or anything, the story keeps descending into a very bland mystery/thriller. It suffers mostly from wooden performances and dialogue.

    Flip-flopping constantly with awe and bore, my attention was lost and regained, and lost, and regained, and so on. As if watching a director have days where he was doing exactly what he intended to do, then on some days he just couldn't convey his idea properly. And then other flaws of the film seemed to have suffered in post-production.

    It's not a terrible movie, but it does have some terrible qualities. Which is very polarizing.

    I can't say I'd recommend it to anyone. I won't watch it again. Not bad, but not great.
  • The opening of Kiss Me Deadly was something that I saw years before I saw the full film of Aldrich's Kiss Me Deadly, courtesy of Scorsese's American Movies doc. Just from this I could tell this movie had something "else" to this. In an incredible but shocking and, in its way, logical process, it shows a series of shots of a woman running down a road, stopping thanks to a car (driven by our PI, Mike Hammer), and then after a few moments of being safe with this man and the mystery not revealed yet... the car is stopped, feet come forward - and a dissolve over a woman's scream to a woman's legs being tortured. Then the perspective of Hammer, off to the side totally out of it, hearing men's voices discussing vague things involving what to do.

    As any Screen writing 101 teacher will tell you, getting the opening and the ending of a movie right is so crucial. Here, this movie has both, and the ending involves that briefcase (yeah, that one, thanks Quentin for the reference). But what Aldrich and his collaborators do here is interesting: if you hear on the interview on the Criterion DVD, the movie isn't a close adaptation of the book - in fact it deviates a bit. The book doesn't have the whole aspect of the nuclear secrets. It was just another story of Hammer getting into violent s*** and kicking ass and taking names in the midst of his story.

    Luckily, Aldrich also has a fine lead in Ralph Meeker, who can play tough and take-no-s*** just fine (he never 'made it' as a leading man, but he shows up in a number of memorable movies over the years from Alrdich, Kubrick and Lang). In this story Hammer is out to find out what the hell happened to him that night, who that dame was (played by a young Cloris Leachman by the way), and why he was set up to die in a car crash. He gets help from a mechanic and his secretary, but of course Hammer also has to contend with the FBI. Why are they involved? Oh, you'll find out.

    The quality of the writing, however much it eschews Spillane's text or not, helps Aldrich to get to what he needs with this story. But it's such a rich film visually, too. He chooses his shots carefully, he doesn't cut to quickly when a key piece of info comes up (i.e. the first time any nuclear talk comes up between Hammer and an FBI guy), and how he follows people and then proceeds to beat them up. Or just talks to the woman by his side in the story (the one who... well, don't want to spoil it just yet).

    It's the kind of no-nonsense noir I wish I had seen on a big screen first. It's made for that, and I imagine if a film society or retro-house put it on a double bill with something like The Big Heat, also featuring Meeker in a much different role, it'd grow some hair on a man's chest! Seriously, this is strong stuff of the period, which also somehow manages to push the envelope of what you could show at the time by what it doesn't show (how is Christina tortured for example - we don't know, and that makes it worse). It's a director taking B-movie pulp and elevating it with art and craft and a vision. And grit. And blood.
  • Film Dog19 March 1999
    A cult classic because, for 1955, it was considered ultra-violent and ultra-sleazy. Mike Hammer solves all with wanton violence. Not the best of films, but quite interesting and campy as all get-out.
  • sol-kay25 September 2003
    "Kiss Me Deadly" starts off like a bad dream. Mike Hammer, Ralph Meeker,is driving up a highway with the credits of the movie rolling downside up on the screen to Nat King Cole music when he almost runs over Christina Baily, Carol Leachman. Who for some reason is on the highway in the middle of the night trying to escape from someone.

    Hammer offers her a lift and what little Christina tells him makes him think that she's somewhat unstable. After Hammer has a piece of tree that got stuck under his car, when he tried to avoid hitting Christina, removed at a gas station he drops Christina off at the nearest bus stop. As he sees her for the last time Christina tells Hammer to "remember me". Moments later Hammer is knocked out cold and Christina is being tortured to get her to talk about something by a group of unseen tugs with their boss talking as if he were a professor of religious studies at the local university instead of being a ruthless criminal. Thrown off a cliff Hammer survives but Christina doesn't and from then on in the movie Hammer's haunted by what Christina told him before she died: "Remember me".

    The movie "Kiss Me Deadly" just takes off and never lets up for the entire 1 hour and 45 minutes that it's on the screen with Mike Hammer trying to tie all the strings together and get to the bottom of what was so important about a runaway women. A nobody that the whole California underworld was so interested in. And even more what she knew about a hidden box and where it was that cost her her life.

    "Kiss Me Deadly" starts off like an average crime movie but as the plot starts to unfold the viewers start to realize that there's more to the movie then what they thought there is, much more. There's something so terrifying about what poor Christina knew that it transcended anything movie goers were used to seeing in a crime movie.

    "Kiss Me Deadly" has stood the test of time for almost 50 years because there's never been a crime movie ever made with a script that had anything close to it's storyline. Ralph Meeker as Mike Hammer, even though he was the "good guy" in the movie, was as ruthless and as brutal as any of the "heavies" in the film. The only time he showed any shock or fear was when Lt.Murphy, Wesley Addy, told Hammer what he was really up against. Stunned all that Hammer could meekly say was "I didn't know" but by then it was too late.

    Like Dr. Sobrein, Albert Dakker, the top gangster in the movie said at the end of the film to his girlfriend Gabriel, lily Carver, about the mysterious suitcase. Your curiosity will opened a Pandora's box and by doing so it's going to kill all the cats it the world.

    What Christina told Hammer before she was murdered by Soberin's hoods "remember me" was a clue that led to something that if Hammer knew what it was even he would have stayed as far away from it as he possibly could. But then we wouldn't have had a masterpiece of Film-Noir as "Kiss Me Deadly. The only way the movie could have worked, and become as great as it is, is that the truth about what everyone in the film was looking for "the great what's it" as Hammer's secretary Valda, Maxine Cooper, called it was much bigger then anything that anyone in the movie could have imagined. The "great What's it" had to be kept secret almost to the very end of the movie or else the story would have not have made any sense and the viewing public would have not found the story believable.

    I'm glad to see that TCM has restored the last two minutes of "Kiss Me deadly" to what it was when it was originally released back in 1955. It made the ending, which was the only thing about the movie that was uneven and confusing, make sense.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is bad director Robert Aldrich's best movie, which says more than it oughtta. He is often less than competent, and this isn't really a good movie, in any traditional sense: the story is contrived, the characters are absurd, the acting is all over the map...

    But it is innovative in odd ways, and some of these weird choices changed the whole noir genre forever. The box you can't look inside, the unseen gesture of violence, an utterly brutal, misogynist, and sociopathic protagonist: people fifty years later think that these are noir hallmarks (a sad number think they were invented by Quentin Tarantino), when in fact they're from a movie made ten years after the genre's high water mark. That doesn't make them good, and it doesn't make the movie better than MALTESE FALCON or MURDER MY SWEET or OUT OF THE PAST or DOUBLE INDEMNITY, or POSTMAN, or BORDER INCIDENT... hell, it's not in the same league with those. But the film's enduring popularity says something for it. What, I don't know.

    And I'm sick of people calling Ralph Meeker a bad actor. As opposed to what? I'd like to see Laurence Olivier play Mike Hammer this well. Perhaps Meeker's not a great actor, but he's great in PATHS OF GLORY, and he's great in this, because he captures the nihilism of Aldrich's world. His grin when he slams the doctor's hand in the drawer; the disgust in his voice when he belittles his women; his delight in slapping the old desk clerk: these make the movie. Again, it's not a good movie. But it is something.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    After watching this cinematic abomination, I felt embarrassed for anyone remotely associated with it, down to the Script Girl, Scene Dresser and the Caterer. One of the worst examples of noir as it's a watered-down version of the Genuine Article that makes clumsy, gratuitous use of early Cold War paranoia in a most cartoonish manner.

    Because of its weak script and maladroit direction, the performances of several usually competent actors (Ralph Meeker, Albert Dekker, Paul Stewart, Jack Elam, Cloris Leachman) are either sub par or wasted. Meeker tries to make a go of the Mike Hammer character, but he's too pudgy and soft-looking to be convincing in the role of red-blooded, iron-fisted tough guy. Since the script is so lame, ill-focused and full of extraneous padding, the motivations and actions of his character seem vacant or tentative. His brooding doesn't convey a sense of inner struggle, rather, he comes off as blank-looking and a tad dim. Also, as Hammer has his gun license suspended in the early going of the film, the character without the gat is like Jason Giambi off steroids.

    The film does not have enough plot or character development to justify its 100+ minute running time: as perhaps 20 minutes of the picture should have been left on the cutting room floor, the pacing of the movie is sluggish and its narrative management is meandering. There are dozens of very long takes in the film where not much is happening narratively: it seems that the characters are just Doing Things and Killing Time, merely fulfilling the duration requirements of a feature film.

    Too many of the film's undercurrents and plot twists are left unexplained. Perhaps this was meant to enhance the intrigue of the piece, maybe this was a tip of the hat to design features of the noir genre, i.e., evanescent and nebulous plot lines, contradictory narrative elements, etc., that add to the mystery of the story and suggest the nature of human reality (that matters don't always tie up at the end into a neat bundle). But I think not: this is just a case of a sloppy, wheezy and ill-managed script not delivering on the responsibility of bringing the audience sufficiently into the loop.

    What I found particularly annoying was the insistence on including in the cast ethnic types with bogus foreign accents, jabbering away in an over-the-top fashion. This happens in three instances. Equally annoying was Meeker's/Hammer's habit of drinking out of other people's glasses, taking cigarettes out of other people's pockets, etc.

    The handling of the "whatsit" (some sort of vague nuclear material) was pretty hokey, too. Naive and magical treatment of the film's central narrative motivation that was laughable in its implausibility. It was never explained how the Cloris Leachman character got tied up with this atomic intrigue, nor was the justification of crime figures' interest in the black market material. We can make assumptions on the second issue, but the first truly exercises the audience's suspension of disbelief.

    Extremely lame ending, too. Hammer, with a slug in him, and Velda waltzing about in the surf while maverick nuclear material merely burns down the beach house. Right. No thought of the ensuing contamination, obviously, by the writers, director and producer of this piece of crap. Also what was truly rich in this regard was the scene at the health club when Hammer opens the box for the first time and is left with a burn on his wrist. No radiation sickness ensues. Right. And just what is that magic box made of that it can contain such virulent material? And the film just kinda ends, somewhat arbitrarily, immediately after the big Hollywood special effects finish. No narrative rundown, no suggestion of what would likely to come next. The incomplete feel to the ending makes one think that maybe they just ran out of film stock at that point.

    Also, the women in this flick, excepting Ms. Leachman, are pretty beat up looking. If you're going to have starlets in eye candy, window dressing roles, at least get some babes who look like something. That sweaty actress who played Velda was built like Marcel Marceau and looked like she needed a good bath.

    The only positive attributes of this film were technical issues and style points. Some of the scenes were very well composed and shot, there was some good camera movement and the lighting was indeed top notch. The art direction did capture that cheezy mid-1950s feel and the flick was indeed atmospheric, but these are ancillary concerns in relation to the primary purpose of film-making, i.e., storytelling. Loved that 1955 (1954?) Corvette Hammer drove, though...

    I saw this film last evening at a theater in downtown Manhattan: most of the audience was laughing out loud at how dreadful this picture is, and there was a palpable sense of relief in the auditorium when it ended.

    But all these negatives aren't particularly surprising when you consider who directed this fiasco. Robert Aldrich made a career of writing, directing and producing really lame, stupid, unbelievable and unconvincing films, and this tepid attempt is typical of his third rate oeuvre.
An error has occured. Please try again.