Sudden Danger (1955) User Reviews (6)

Eye Operation

[bkoganbing · 5/10 · 19 August 2014]

In the second of Bill Elliott's quintet of police stories his character surname was changed from Flynn to Doyle and he was to stay Doyle for the rest of this series. Why it was changed God only knows, but these films were nothing that the public couldn't get on television.

This time Lieutenant Doyle of the Los Angeles Police Department is called in on a case that looks like suicide. The woman's blind son Tom Drake called it in after discovering his mother's body and an open gas jet. The coroner even says it was suicide, but Elliott keeps investigating.

Of course it was murder and of course Elliott first zeroes in on Drake because he needed his mother's insurance money for the operation to cure his blindness. But in the end it turns into something entirely different.

Nice, but nothing special.

Was it suicide or was it murder?

[Paularoc · 6/10 · 5 September 2015]

This is one of five mysteries Westerns star Bill Elliott did in the fifties. He returns as a Lieutenant in the L.A. Sheriff's Department but is now called Andy Doyle. I preferred this entry into the series over the first due to the superior supporting cast of Tom Drake, Beverly Garland, Lyle Talbot and Minerva Urecal. Also, this entry was more of a true mystery than Dial Red 0. The first mystery is whether Wallace Curtis' (Drake) mother committed suicide or was murdered, a mystery that Lt. Doyle resolves. But if murder, whodunit? A prime suspect would be Curtis since he was accidentally blinded by his mother. Drake and Beverly Garland, who plays Curtis' girlfriend, Phyllis, really shine in this movie. In fact, their characters are more memorable than Elliott's. Garland had a long television career and is noted for her groundbreaking although short lived television series "Decoy." A good mystery with a solid cast.

Taking Tom Drake from "The Boy Next Door" to a possible player of "Blind Man's Bluff".

[mark.waltz · 5/10 · 15 September 2014]

In "Meet Me in St. Louis", the boyishly handsome Tom Drake courted Judy Garland. Just 11 years later, he has aged a bit, and is in love with the womanly Beverly Garland. Is he also a brutal mother killer? Bill Elliott returns as the Hollywood detective who has his doubts, even with evidence pointing towards him. You see, his mother (discovered dead by asphyxiation in the very first scene) was the one responsible for his blindness, and Drake's nosy landlady (a very boisterous Minerva Urecal) gives Elliott the indication that his mother refused to use her medical insurance so Drake could have eye surgery to restore his sight. So the motive is there, but as clues are discovered, Elliott is unsure if the barely grieving son is the guilty party.

While there are elements of film noir here, they are not as heavy as the film series' first entry ("Dial Red O"), although the set-up is definitely dark. There's enough mystery to give multiple facets to the characters played by Drake and Garland so you really don't know what side of the law they are really on. To bring in a femme fatal character (played by the ironically named Helene Stanton, not to be confused with Helene Stanley from "Dial Red O") and a rather sleazy businessman (Lyle Talbot) also adds a few more elements of film noir, but this is more traditional than the first entry.

Wait until daylight.

[ulicknormanowen · 5/10 · 16 May 2022]

A most atypical career :Hubert Cornfield began with a thriller "sudden danger" and ended with two films which both took place in France "the night of the following day" (starring Marlon Brando ) ,the second effort being quite simply a French production ("les grands moyens" )

"Sudden danger" is essentially a whodunit , particularly gripping in its first part ,the second spilling the beans too soon and featuring a too predictable ending : it would have been more interesting to show the mother/son relationship (and also the girlfriend/mother one) ,his reaction to his mom's private life ; so, IMHO ,the movie begins too late ; the busybody manager could have been thus a stronger asset.

"the third voice " and the before mentioned Brando/Boone thriller (1968)are better Cornfield stuff.

Nice surprise

[AAdaSC · 8/10 · 8 November 2010]

Det Andy Doyle (Bill Elliott) suspects that a suicide is actually a murder. He suspects the victim's son, Wallace (Tom Drake) who is blind and he pursues him until he gets to the truth..

This is a good detective mystery that is well-acted by all. A special mention must go to Minerva Urecal who plays the nosy landlady and neighbour "Mrs Kelly" and Beverley Garland who plays Drake's girlfriend "Phyllis". Andy Doyle has a similar style to Columbo in that he keeps coming back to pester people. It's quite amusing although I'm not sure that this was intended. He's a right pain in the arse. But a pleasant one! He's very straight-talking but meets his match with several other straight-talkers in the cast, notably Mrs Kelly on their first meeting. She's quite funny.

The storyline will keep you guessing as to what really occurred and it moves along at a nice pace. This was a surprisingly good discovery and I will be looking out for more of these Bill Elliott detective stories.

Beginning the strange Noir career of director Hubert Cornfield

[TheFearmakers · 8/10 · 31 January 2021]

All of Film Noir turned Neo Noir director Hubert Cornfield's thrillers start out with an illegal act and then have the characters dealing with the consequences... And this, being his first picture, marks the biggest difference in that it's a partial mystery...

Especially since you just know the blind guy who can't afford a cure... until his mother's apparent suicide lands him the exact amount for a top surgeon... isn't what the token badgering cop thinks he is: guilty of murder...

Let's forget the men: the best character is also the prettiest, and there are two contrasting dames including the outright bombshell Helene Stanton, oblivious moll of a sneaky rich guy...

But it's b-starlet Beverly Garland as the blind man's faithful girl-next-door girlfriend who steals the show, particularly in scenes where the cop, trying to wear her down while learning she's not as weak as she seems, gets worn out in the process...

Thus making SUDDEN DANGER stand above the typical poverty row programmer that, like our Wrong Man anti-hero, deserves another glance.