User Reviews (21)

Add a Review

  • This is a beautifully made, but terribly sad film, based on one of Emile Zola's most depressing stories of French life in the 1800s.

    Gervaise is a poor woman with a poorer choice of men. She is loving, smart, and industrious, but falls for superficial, lazy drunks who take advantage of her. While she tries to provide for her family by following her dream of owning her own shop, her husband drinks away the profits and complicates her life by inviting her former lover to live in their house.

    I can't say enough good things about Maria Schell's glowing performance as a tragic heroine. Her beautiful, expressive face is impossible to forget, and her emotional range is impressive. The rest of the cast is also pitch-perfect, from her various neighbors and clients, down to the lovely little girl who plays daughter Nana with touching sadness.

    Surgeon general's warning: don't watch this film while under the influence of alcohol or mood- depressing drugs. It might push you over your limit.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Acclaimed film from Emile Zola's "L'Assomoir": typical of French art-house cinema, it's meticulously-detailed, technically proficient and splendidly acted – however, the main plot of a crippled woman whose ambitions to open her own laundry business are hampered by a complex love life isn't exactly thrilling. Still, one can certainly understand the multitude of international prizes the film won or was nominated for at the time of its release.

    In fact, Gervaise (German actress Maria Schell in a luminous performance) is involved throughout with a philandering ne'er-do-well (who fathered her two elder children), her husband – splendidly portrayed by Francois Perier – who loses his job after falling off a roof and subsequently takes to drink (with whom she has another kid) and a young political activist (who gets thrown into jail)! The woman has a similarly ambivalent relationship with her husband's family and the neighbors in the poor quarter where she lives – especially the sister (played by a reptilian Suzy Delair) of the woman with whom her first lover eloped. They have a big fight in the washing centre of town (which even involves some surprising split-second nudity) but, when they meet again, both are willing to bury the hatchet (Delair having married the local police constable)...that is, until the lover himself reappears! Ironically, Perier and his rival become friends (they even look alike!) and the former eventually contrives to have the latter lodge with them!!

    Ultimately, though, Perier's drinking problem escalates to the point where he becomes an embarrassment to his wife (admirably, the director does not shy away from showing his vomit-soaked pillow at one point!) and, in a fit of rage, destroys her shop; this harrowing sequence culminates in him being taken away by hospital attendants bruised and raving (in fact, he dies shortly afterwards). Equally depressing, however, is the ending – which finds Schell destitute (having sold the shop to Delair, now in cahoots with her former lover) and herself a frequent customer of the local tavern!; no longer able to care for her youngest daughter, the latter is forced to look out for herself – which she does with naïve optimism.

    I have two more titles by the underrated Clement in my unwatched VHS/DVD pile – JOY OF LIVING (1960) and IS Paris BURNING? (1965) – as well as another highly regarded French film starring Maria Schell – Alexandre Astruc's UNE VIE (1958; though available only in its original language)...
  • Against every preconception I could think of, I loved this film. Gervaise is not only an interesting parable which rightly exposes the us to the dangers of drink, but making Maria Schell the protagonist casts the light of feminism into the equation. There is no way to ignore this interpretation either given Schell's brilliantly righteous performance as Gervaise.

    Her husband is a drunken fool, no longer able to bring in money to support his family following an accident François Perier plays a drunk worryingly convincingly, but Gervaise is far from helpless. She puts up with the incessant tirade of abuse, womanising and eventually the violence. She is vulnerable yet forceful, respected but never entirely respectful. Nonetheless she is a protagonist and she isn't without her flaws. Her forgiveness of her husband cannot be criticised; we mustn't forget that we're watching a film about the second empire. The issues however are increasingly relevant. Both to Clement as a director in the 1950's and to anyone who decides that picking up a bottle can only harm the consumer.
  • tintin-2318 February 2008
    Warning: Spoilers
    René Clément's "Gervaise" is an adaptation of Emile Zola's "L'assommoir," (1877), and part of the long series of novels, "Les Rougon Macquart," the natural and social history of a family under the Second Empire of Napoleon III. Gervaise-Macquart is the heroine in one of these novels, "L'Assommoir," which examines the milieu of the working class and the plague which is alcoholism.

    However, Clément did not simply condense this monumental novel into a one and one-half hour film, which in the process would have only betrayed Zola's masterpiece. Clément, while scrupulously respecting the work of Emile Zola, makes a film centered on one character, Gervaise, a poignant and incredible picture of that period. Clément's choice resulted in "L'Assommoir," the novel, becoming "Gervaise," the film. In this film, he follows Zola's naturalistic approach, which at the limit becomes a stylized realism, a vision whose blackness takes on epic proportions. Clément represents very real emotions until they are reduced almost to abstractions. The result of such representation would seem to be the very opposite of realism and of naturalism. But his cruelty, which carries him until the end of a particular situation, sometimes even too far, merges with Zola's exacerbation of the situation (although Zola's clinical details are mixed with a resonant lyricism). With Clément, we do not end up with caricatures but with an authentic naturalism, which although refined is not less cruel.

    A first-class group of actors was assembled to breathe life into Zola's words. Maria Schell (1926 - 2005), Francois Périer (1919 - 2002), both received prizes for their interpretations. Armand Mestral (1917 - 2000) and Susy Delair are outstanding in their respective roles.

    René Clément shows his virtuosity in the cutting and editing of his work. The linkages give his film its extraordinary wholeness of form and its fluidity. The dissolves, when not passing directly from one scene to the next, are almost seamless, and most often they are accompanied by voice over comments. Clément exploits the lighting changes to reinforce the story. Many sequences open with a clear, pale luminosity, ending in a night-time. This, in fact, gives a kind of symbolic lighting to the film.

    The camera motions are primarily tracking-pan shots, with the camera constantly following the actors in occasionally long, or sometimes infinitely short, motions, but always moving. In opposition, long motionless shots reinforce the main dramatic scenes. There are numerous series of close-ups, which serve either to emphasizing the psychology of the characters, or because the overall composition of a shot has a precise psychological significance.

    Much of the dialogue is taken verbatim from Zola's novel. Discrete commentaries in voice over by Gervaise link certain scenes and remind us that "L'Assommoir" has become the history of this woman. Little by little, Gervaise's commentaries diminish in frequency with the film progression, as she becomes more and more tired and despondent, eventually disappearing completely, replaced by the sound effects.

    The music is by the renowned classical composer George Auric, a member of "le Groupe des Six." Clément's choice of Auric to write the music for this film was not arbitrary. The credo of the "Six" was a music based in everyday life, on vulgar spectacles (circuses, fairs. music halls, street songs), to confront us with the "real life." Auric's music is discreet and used sparingly.

    At the time Zola wrote the novel, he was strongly criticized for using such powerful material, as well as for presenting opinions of the lower classes. "Gervaise" is above all an historical document of the life in the middle 1850s, in the working class milieu in Paris. The daily, unbearable workers' conditions are remarkably well-portrayed in this film, without editorial comments. In those days, a work-day for a man, woman, and child was 15-18 hours; strikes were practically unknown and when one happened, it was violently repressed and their leaders severely punished. There were no social security or retirement plans, and aging without children to help in old age was literally an early death sentence. The salaries were extremely low, and an accident or a sickness would irremediably throw a family into dire, abject poverty. There was no escaping from this reality. The only form of entertainment other than an occasional visit to a "Caf'conc" ("Café Concert"), a kind of musical show, was "l'assommoir" (a bludgeon), the term for a low-class tavern, where men and women were easy prey to alcoholism. Clément shows us the irremediable descent of Coupeau into the alcoholic hell, and all the consequences to his loved-ones. Soon after, Gervaise will follow.

    René Clément tells us the story of Gervaise, a woman subjugated by the men she loved, captive of society, her social background, and social condition, who tries to escape her proletariat status. But external and internal conditions frame our lives, against which our will has no control, and Gervaise's revolt against her condition, her desire to possess her own shop, rising above her station, may have also brought her downfall. A Hindu person would say the she violated her "Dharma." But who knows? Maybe she would have ended up in the same place, but at least she got the satisfaction of having chosen her own instrument of torture.

    One of the three important men in Gervaise's life is Goujet, and with him Clément introduces a sub-theme-- a political one. The 1850s saw the democratic ideals of the first French revolution of 1789 logically progressing toward a budding Socialism, coming in as a reaction against the new slavery of the industrial revolution, Capitalism. Goujet, the blacksmith, represents the ideal socialist revolutionary, a hard-working, honest laborer, just asking for justice and his deserved place "at the table." He is ready to sacrifice himself for the benefit of a better life not only for himself, but also for his fellow workers.

    René Clément's adaptation of Emile Zola's novel "L'Assommoir" is widely regarded as one of his best films and it is unquestionably one of his most poignant and intense works.
  • This is one of the best movie I've ever seen. Maria Schell is beautiful and hearthbreaking.I am not surprised it won the best foreign film of 1956. Suzy Delair is terrific and Francois Perier is superb. I will never forget this movie. It touched me deeply.
  • This as far as I know is the only film version of a very famous story by a French Novelist called Emile Zola. It is "L'Assommoir" and is the story of how drink and alcohol can ruin lives and kill. The film is extremely well acted but seems a bit "short" compared to the book which has far more lurid details concerning the downfall of each of the characters. The story takes place behind the Gare du Nord in the Northern Sector of Paris in what is called today the "Quartier de la Goutte d'Or". Unfortunately that area today bears absolutely no resemblance to that portrayed either in the book or the film and is extremely dangerous and violent - any visit of it is strongly advised against. Anyway the story is very moving but be warned the outcome is not a happy one. One other thing, the book is one of a series written by Zola about a family called "Les Rougon-Macquart". The series also includes the book "Germinal" which has several times been made as a film. But of all the films of Zola's books I have see, L'Assommoir (Gervaise ) is my favourite !
  • "Gervaise" is a film based on the story "L'Assommoir" by Emile Zola. It had been filmed several times before (these were mostly silent versions) and this is the most recent version of his story. It's all about a rather pathetic poor lady (Gervaise--Maria Schell) and her horrible choices of men. It is very well made but not exactly a pleasant film. In fact, at times, it's a bit painful to watch.

    When the film begins, Auguste leaves Gervaise for another woman-- leaving her with children to raise. Eventually she marries Coupeau and their life seems to be going well. However, when the husband gets injured on the job, he degenerates to alcoholism and makes Gervaise's life completely miserable. The husband even knowingly brings his new friend, Auguste, home to live with them---knowing that long ago he was his wife's lover! At the same time, Gervaise has fallen for the only decent man in her life, the blacksmith. What's next in this tale of misery? See the film...if you dare.

    This story is both about the wretched lives of the urban poor, as they are exploited, and about the disintegration of the morals of this class as well. It's not exactly pleasant viewing and is also clearly a lesson about the ills of drink--a very popular message when the film was made and remade several times during the silent era. Nearly everyone in this film is nasty and selfish and despite all this is IS well made. The acting, sets and direction by René Clément are all quite good...but you have to be willing to sit through nearly two hours of wretchedness and who wants to do that?!
  • François Perier as the alcoholic Henri Coupeau is unsurpassed as sick man having his overdose and delirium by alcohol. Maria Shell as Gervaise is convincing as the poor woman working day and night for the drunken men she is having in her home and her little daughter! This movie should be shown to all people having drinking problems. As it is set in a different period (the end of the second Emperor Napoleon's reign) is has something universal. The general atmosphere of this epoch is however very accurate.
  • "Gervaise" is an adaptation of the novel "L'assommoir" (1877, Emile Zola). In this novel a working cass woman breaks down due to a lot of bad luck and a lot of booze. When the novel came out there was discussion if the book was defending the working class (describing their harsh live) or insulting the working class (describing their alcohol abuse).

    The film above everything seems to be defending women, describing the struggle Gervaise (Maria Schell) has to wage against the two idlers of husbands that play a role in her life. This is because the film omits the excessive pride of Gervaise that she does have in the novel. This results in a totally innocent woman having bad luck again and again. This overdose of bad luck gives the film a somewhat moralistic tone (it has sometimes been denoted as a very long commercial against alcohol abuse) and even becomes unintentionally funny / corny.

    Although the film is somewhat outdates, it was one of the nominees for best foreign language film in 1956, so the film must have its pros. Apart from the acting of Maria Schell I would like to mention the beautiful setpieces. The film has partly the same bittersweet (a little bit more bitter) mood as "Casque d'or" (1952, Jacques Becker), a film that was made and situated in the same time as "Gervaise".
  • It required some self-convincing before I crossed my fingers and watched this filmed version of Emile Zola's L'Assommoir. Zola's work, I find, is nearly impossible to translate to the screen. To wit, I cite Jean Renoir's horrible adaptation of La Bete Humaine, with Jean Gabin no less and Simone Simon. Somehow film has not succeeded in capturing the dark, dismal heart of Zola's naturalisme. Read Zola's 20-volume series of novels, the Rougon-Macquart. The only question you will have is which one ends on the bleakest note. Few of his protagonists walk away on the final page, if they live to walk away at all, happily into the sunset - the exceptions being invariably the scoundrels, power-hungry Eugène Rougon, his money-grubbing brother Aristide, or the grasping retail magnate Octave Mouret. L'Assommoir, along with Germinal, La Curée and L'Oeuvre, are among the most dismal, though personally I was left most entirely depressed at the end of La Terre and the ironic La Joie de Vivre. That said, I was surprised. René Clément's Gervaise almost succeeds. It comes close to conjuring the darkness and despair and sense of futility in a Zola novel. Almost. He had a tremendous assist from Maria Schell. Her Gervaise is a truly hertbreaking characterization. She is exactly as Zola depicted her: kind-hearted, hard-working, generous, but totally lacking in the ruthlessness needed to survive - a born victim of a ruthless world. Zola would have applauded.

    The screenplay changes some of the story, but not nearly as much as do other cinematic adaptations of great novels. It omits some characters, the brutal domestic violence episodes of the family Bijard. But that is to be expected. It reduces the role of Gervaise's in-laws the Lorilleux, who in the novel work rapaciously in their narrow, overheated apartment hammering out enough tiny gold chains to stretch from Paris to Marseille. It exaggerates the character of Virginie, building her into a veritble femme fatale. She, in the novel, is not the machinator of Gervaise's downfall. She is herself a victim of Lantier's parasitism, once he latches onto her household. Life and heredity are the cause of Gervaise's fated fall. Those are her nemeses. Zola himself, defending his work against critics - for the right, L'Assommoir was a left-wing attack on the virtue of the capitalist work ethic; for the left it was a right-wing slander on the noble and virtuous working class - described it as "la déchéance fatale d'une famille ouvrière dans le milieu empesté de nos faubourgs," the inevitable downfall of a working-class family in our sordid suburbs.

    Two scenes are perfect evocations of the book: the party scene and the visit to the Louvre. Coupeau's long, agonizing descent into alcoholism is more drawn out and more devastating, and his death, not at home but in the hospital drunk ward in the grip of delerium tremens, is much more harrowing in the novel. The film leaves Gervaise alive. Zola did not. His story continues to her death of starvation, huddled in the tiny cubby-hole once inhabited by père Bru. That, I guess, was a sadness too far for the film. The film leaves us with a wink and a nod as little Nana flaunts out into the street with her new ribbon. Those who have read on in the series know what will be her degenerate life and miserable death once she gets to star in her own novel. For a mediocre filming of that story, try the 1955 movie with Martine Carol and Charles Boyer.
  • First, the setting: how did Clement manage to re-create so well the surroundings of 1850s working class Paris? Then the costumes: faultless! The dialogue: painfully realistic. Gervaise's lover and her husband are portrayed as attractive men lacking will-power, although they are fairly decent to poor, limping Gervaise with the pretty face and indulgent manner. They actually take a liking to each other and live together with her, both scrounging off her laundry business that a third man donated to her.

    Another commentator pointed out the murderous urban working hours, more than 15 hours a day for most, and pay was just sufficient to survive. There was no welfare, no pension, no nothing. This was the workaday world against which Gervaise rebelled, determined to acquire her own laundry business. Of course, the useless men managed to wreck everything for her. It's a wrenching drama, with the inexorable sad ending. Extraordinary that only 10 people have managed to view it and comment upon it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The climactic scene of this movie is comparable to the straitjacket scene in Blake Edwards' "Days of Wine and Roses" in that after viewing these films back to back one might be tempted to cut down one's beer consumption for that day....the difference being Jack Lemmon suffers alone, whereas Francois Perier brings his wife's fragile world crashing down with him....it would be hard to judge which scenario is more devastating. Both men give towering performances..."Gervaise" tops "Wine" in its mise en scene, an unequalled view of late 19th century French provincial squalor. The production design here is beyond praise...I was surprised to find myself somewhat shocked at the domestic arrangements that Maria Schell's character endured, even at this permissive date...Zola's portrayal of domestic scandal does not date....some "arrangements" are just a bad idea, no matter what century you live in.
  • felipe1928 December 2020
    Warning: Spoilers
    Mediocre scenario, poor dialogues, banal music (still Auric) : nothing to be saved in this film. In the end, a cucuterie. Watch rather Maria Schell with Marcello Mastroianni in "White Nights" !
  • Why Maria Schell?If you have read Zola's masterpiece -"l'assommoir" the seventh of the Rougon Macquart saga,and one of the finest, surpassed only by "Germinal"- ,you wonder why Clement chose her when the part was tailor made for Simone Signoret.On the other hand ,Suzy Delair was the ideal Virginie Poisson,hypocrite venomous and vile .They say her buttocks were "dubbed" (by Liliane Montevecchi's) during the famous scene of the spanking ! René Clément did a good job even if his adaptation seemed sometimes tame and timid .Zola's depictions are so intense that it's hard to transfer them to the screen.But the " fête de Gervaise " ,with the gargantuan meal comes close to fully recreate it,and it was not easy since in the book it spreads over about twenty pages.

    Despise some reservations,this is an unqualified must for good cinema lovers.
  • A terribly tragic and horrible story of the growing degradation and poverty of a working class family allows for a raw and cynical movie, a kind of naturalist manifesto. Its characters are frustrating in their self destruction. From the start we know that they have no chance of salvation, because degradation and vice surround them and impel them at every step. For example, Gervaise, the protagonist, dreams of a ransom from poverty and seems almost to succeed, but a mere accident to sink her slowly into a physical and psychological brutalization that will reduce her to an animal level is enough. The central point of the movie is precisely this: the poor act by survival instinct and for them the laws of decorum or morality are not valid: prostitution is a way of not starving, alcoholism distracts from the ugliness of a miserable life. What makes it an excellent film, however, is not so much the message as the style: René Clement is a superb storyteller. He builds images of great descriptive power, so vivid that they almost seem to smell and taste. Gervaise is an adaptation of L'Assomoir, the seventh volume in Emile Zola's Rougon-Macquart cycle of 20 novels. Along with 'Nana' and 'Germinal' it is probably Zola's most famous. Zola's novel title is a metonymy: Father Colombe's Tavern, known as the Assommoir, was on the corners of the Rue des Poissonniers and of the Boulevard de Rochechouart. Parisian life in the 19th century remains a study for anthropologists to this day. Lower classes were grim. Their life was all but ruined by the brutality brought on, for instance, by alcoholism. Gervaise is the heroine. For a time she seems fortunate enough, but she succumbs as well. This was definitely one of the 20 best movies released in 1956, together with The Searchers Un condamné à mort s'est échappé ou Le vent souffle où il veut The Killing, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Nuit et brouillard Bob le flambeur, Toute la mémoire du monde, Aparajito, Patterns, Giant, The Harder They Fall, Bigger Than Life, Voici le temps des assassins..., The Man Who Knew Too Much, The Wrong Man, La traversée de Paris, Written on the Wind, Attack, Friendly Persuasion.
  • Maria Schell plays the titular character in this film adaptation of Emile Zola's novel L'Assomoir. This is like the saddest movie ever. I seriously wept for twenty minutes after it finished, and every time I think of it I start to tear up again. Schell plays a poor washerwoman with little luck in men. Her first man, who never married her, leaves her with two young boys for another woman. Her next man, her first husband (played by Francois Perier), becomes a slave to wine, chronically unemployed and defying his wife and family at every turn for another drink. Sure, this is your typical suffering woman narrative, but, Hell, women have suffered throughout history, and this is a downright powerful story. The characterizations are very complex, and every actor in the film is absolutely perfect. L'Assomoir came in the middle of a cycle of twenty novels. Gervaise's daughter, Nana, was the focus of a later novel in the series (Jean Renoir adapted that novel, called Nana, in 1926).
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This film reminds me so much of my mother who also was a hard working social striver and had a string (or was it serial monogamy) of useless lovers, one of which was my father. My mom was also was trying to "move up" but this time from her "petit bourgeois" background. Her parents were shopkeepers but she wanted to be an educated professional.

    The only reason my mother was successful professionally and did not fall into drink or drugs was that her compulsion was precisely that of being a workaholic and she also dumped the men instead of holding onto them. Perhaps we have made some progress.

    After reading so many excellent reviews and comments on the artistic and social merits of the film. I can only add that what we have at the base of this story is the basic yin and yang of the optimistic hardworking person who attracts a series of losers into a miasma that eventually bring her down.

    Today its called co-dependency.

    I disagree with many other reviewers who believe the film is about alcholism, as any drug or obsessive behavior could be substituted for alcohol. Alcohol is just a part of the social context, the drug of choice for the working class.

    As for the social angle, we see the political changes coming in this film, but when they come they will not solve everything either. Today we have a social net that would "welfarise" these people but still will not cure them of their tragic fall from being productive members of society into complete degeneracy.

    Is this a tragic fatalistic view of society -- as it appears on first consideration. Are they saying we can never win? Is the "individual" actually able to break through..? Please everyone be aware that the film at no time says "this must to happen to you.." I think it is only Zola and Clement saying that when this is happening it will look like this.

    We know life is hard. Gervaise seriously lacked integrity, emotional honesty and was hopelessly co-dependent. Her ever-optimistic point of view was a trap that overlaid her wretched world with kind tolerance, blind spots and small sentimental indulgences that would lead her down the garden path to ruin. Her positivity attracted psychic vampires.

    Beware all that believe a positive attitude will fix everything. In the belle epoque, in the postwar years the film was made in, and in the world of today, it still takes a little more.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I've always felt "La Assommoir" by Zola, the most depressing, heart wrenching book I have ever read. It was almost as if Zola was saying, if you are decent, hard working and try to better yourself and you are a woman, your life will be paved with misery. It is one book I have never been able to reread. Initially, in the book Gervaise is seen as a lovely young mother determined to do her best at honest work for her children as her horrible lover leaves her to escape family responsibility. She meets a roofer Henri, who worships her - and it is all down hill from there. In keeping with Zola's character tie-ins (most of his books were linked), one of her children is Nana, the subject of Zola's most acclaimed book. For some strange reason I felt drawn to the movie - I wanted to see if there was any hope or brightness that I had missed in the book.

    This amazing movie starts with a burst of life - a huge fight in the laundry among hot, sudsy buckets of water between Gervaise and Virginie, the sister of the woman who has run off with Gervaise's lover, Lanier, with whom she has had two children. The viciousness and the brutality of the fight is shocking. Gervaise is triumphant, but it is one of the last times she does triumph.

    Eventually Gervaise marries - to a good man Henri, who adores her and they eventually have a little girl, Nana. There is also another Zola reference to Therese Raquin, when Henri's sister comments on Gervaise's striking resemblance to Therese "the one who died of consumption". Gervaise longs to have her own laundry but on the day her dreams are to be realised Henri has a horrible accident. He falls off a roof and because of Gervaise's insistence on nursing him herself (instead of taking him to the free hospital) it takes all their savings and prolongs his recovery to six months. At the end of which Henri is a hopeless alcoholic and permanently unemployable. Through the efforts of their good friend Goujet,a blacksmith (who is in love with Gervaise) she is able to open her own laundry but Henri when he is not being a nuisance in the shop, has taken to pawning the laundry items for drinking money.

    This is the beginning of the end - Virginie comes back to the street with her husband Mr. Fish, who is a policeman and even though she warmly embraces Gervaise and wants to put the fight behind them, she is a false friend and a troublemaker. Lanier then turns up and the drunken Henri makes a companion of him, even inviting him to take up residence with them as a permanent boarder. Definitely not as black as the book which goes into minute detail of Gervaise's descent into drunkenness, even ending with her living in the tiny closet that Old Bru lived in.

    During this time Goujet has gone to prison for inciting the impoverished workers to fight for an extra 5 cents a week. When he comes out and sees the living arrangements between her and Henri and Lanier, he wants nothing more to do with her but agrees to take on her eldest son as an apprentice. The film ends with Gervaise sitting numbly in the tavern while Nana, now a child of the streets, makes herself pretty with grubby ribbons. Maria Schell is just perfect, exactly how I imagined Gervaise would be but for a more uplifting Zola book I would recommend "Ladies Delight", about a young woman who works her way up (virtuously!!) to a powerful position in a department store.
  • This is absolutely beautiful movie that depicted brilliantly life of working class in France in the late 19th century. It is based on Emile Zola's novel L'Assommoir.

    The main protagonist is perfectly portrayed by amazing Maria Schell and we can see well into all of Gervaise's virtues, but frailties as well and understand her emotions and struggles she endures constantly in her troubled life. The ending leaves Gervaise in full misery and the director Rene Clement turns our attention to her little daughter Anna - called Nana - that will be the protagonist of another, even more famous Zola's novel of the same name.
  • This is probably Emile Zola's greatest novel in its overwhelming naturalistic revelation of the progress of alcoholism, and René Clement follows the novel conscientiously hardly missing any detail, extremely consistent all the way to the last shattering picture of the ultimate consummation of Gervaise's case. The film reminds very much of the best films of René Clair and Jean Renoir, the public scenes are all marvellous in their genuineness, culminating in the great dinner in the middle of the film, bringing back Gervaise's first husband, who abandoned her with two children at an early stage, whereupon she had to have a husband and found Coupeau the roofer, whom she married and started a new and happier life with, until he fell down from the roof and turned an alcoholic. Well, the film is dominatingly positive most of the part, the street life and common life of the ordinary people of the quarter is depicted with great charm and consistent good humour, while inevitably the tragedy must begin, although fortunately late enough. It is Maria Schell's film, of course, she makes another of her unforgettably lovable female characters, her charm and beauty is always irresistible, and here at times she even provides a striking likeness with one of Raphael's most lovable madonnas. The film is a masterpiece, although somewhat long, while the naturalistic realism of Zola at times becomes unpleasantly overwhelming in its ruthess lack of prudence.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Impressive, dark Emile Zola film adaptation with a fantastic Maria Schell in the title role

    This 1956 French drama film is a total teardown, but what a watch it is! It was directed by Rene Clement (also "The Boat of the Damned" (1947), based on Emile Zola's novel "L'Assommoir" (meaning: The Manslayer, that's the name of the bar in the novel), known as "Die Schnapsbude" in German The action takes place in Paris in the 1850s.

    The film focuses on the laundress Gervaise and therefore the great Maria Schell as the main actress. And this decision is absolutely right! Maria Schell plays as if unleashed and for this role she more than rightly received the Coppa Volpi as best actress at the Venice International Film Festival in 1956.

    Her Gervaise is a disabled washerwoman who lives unmarried with her lover and their two children. When she is abandoned by her lover (Armand Mestral), things initially look very bad for her and her children. Only through his marriage to the roofer Coupeau (Francois Perier, who was also seen as an inspector in "Le samourai" (1967) and as a mafia lawyer in the Italian hit series "La piovra" (three seasons from 1984)) there is some hope again. Thanks to her husband's friend (Jacques Harden as a blacksmith who becomes a harbinger of the emerging workers' movement), Gervaise is even able to open her own laundry room. But this happiness doesn't last long. A terrible accident, resentment in the neighborhood, personal missteps and, above all, alcohol ensure that the small working-class family goes to the dogs.

    This is a very bitter material that is told uncompromisingly and entirely in line with Zola's original. But how this happens is incredibly worth seeing and sometimes terribly funny. In addition to the breathtaking Maria Schell, all the other actors can also shine in their great roles. In addition to those already mentioned, Micheline Luccioni as the provocative Clemence, Mathilde Casadesus as the chatty Madame Boche and of course the recently deceased Suzy Delair (1917-2020) as the devious Virginie Poisson should also be mentioned.

    Two scenes from the plot can simply be described as great. At the very beginning there is a fight in the washhouse between Maria Schell and Suzy Delair, which has cult status and is still absolutely worth seeing. At Gervaise and Coupeau's wedding, the whole party goes to the Louvre and looks at the pictures there. Simply great!

    In general, the dialogues are fantastic, rough and without mincing words! The plot and cinematic implementation are very direct and true to life for a film from the 1950s. Something like this would not have been conceivable in a German or American film at that time.

    This film is a classic that you should definitely see. Maria Schell was able to start her international career with this film. Must see!