User Reviews (20)

Add a Review

  • Quite a filmmaker this Chukhrai was. Not much available from him, but I am happy to have seen two of his movies. "The Forty-first" perhaps wasn't as great as the wonderful "Ballad of a Soldier", but this is still quite an interesting film. Both of these films are war films, but contrary to what one might expect these films are told in a rather romantic, light-hearted, Hollywood style. Both films do have tragic elements which present themselves as the films progress, but they are largely rather light and enjoyable, even charming romance pictures of loved ones being torn apart and doomed by war. This story was started here with "The Forty-first" and would be perfected in "Ballad of a Soldier".

    The script isn't particularly strong here, but where this film really stands out is in its visuals. An utterly stunning visual work from Chukhrai. I'm not sure I have seen a color film look like this one before! You have to see it to understand. Additionally, it's just constantly a visually dynamic film in Chukhrai's camera-movement and use of close-ups. The film is at the very least continually visually interesting and at its peak just stunning to look at. There's a really rich, dreamy atmosphere that develops by the end of the movie, and it makes for a quite unique viewing experience.

    The ending is both quite outlandish but also tragic. Not too sure what to completely make of it. Then again, this was never a film which really strived for any kind of realism, so its over the top nature isn't too jarring with the rest. Actually, the more I think about it, the more I like it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    A Soviet Love Story such as Forty First as is one of the best foreign movie, I ever saw. Produced in the Soviet Union, during the height of the Cold War, this film is one of the first significant films to be produced after the fall of Stalinism after de facto leader Joseph Stalin died a few years before this film came out. I was completely wowed by Director Grigoriy Chukhray's film who is most famous for his work on 1959 'Ballad of a soldier'. The film is based on the novel by Boris Lavrenyev and this film is also a remake of the 1927's Soviet silent film also call 'Forty-First' directed by Yakov Protazanov. The film is set during the Russian Civil War of 1919 to 1922 where Bolsheviks Red Army fought against the anti-Bolsheviks Russian Republic. It tells the story of a tragic romance between a female sniper of the Red Army name Maria Filatovna (Izolda Izvitskaya) and her captured prisoner, Vadim Nikolayevich Govorkha (Oleg Strizhenov) from the White Army. Maria is known as a very good markswoman who has already claimed thirty-eight enemy dead. When her unit ambushes a camel caravan transporting White soldiers, she kills two of them and tries to shoot their officer, who will be her forty-first, but misses. The man, a lieutenant named Govorukha. Instead of killing him, due to him stating out that he had secret information that would help her unit. Maria is entrusted with guarding him while shipping him out to their headquarters through the Aral Sea. The vessel capsized in a sudden storm, and only lead Maria and Govrukha alive, stranded on an isolated island. At first, tensions arise by their different attitudes of life, but slowly become charmed with each other to the point that they befriend each other with affection. For a war movie, there is very little violence in this as most of the movie is romantic. I love the Robinson Crusoe references in the movie. The ending is haunting and one of the best shocking endings I ever saw. It's a shame that this isn't generally available, and hard to find. It took me forever to find a copy. Even if you get a copy, you might not have sub-titles. Just to let you know when trying to translate from the Russians, some of the movies copies got their names wrong. In the original novel, the sniper name is Maryutka Filatovna, while the captured prisoner is Govoruha Jr. Depending of what version you able to get, you might get different names. The biggest confusing is the name of the Lt. that she captured alive. There are such names ranging from Govorukha-Otrok to Govorkha Aksenov. The movie has some really great shots that I love. Both in black and white or in color. If you see it in color, the cinematography by Sergei Urusevsky is just amazing with its use of composition and lighting. If you see it in black and white, you can truly love the dark tone and shadowy side of the film. I would say, watch both versions. I like how they shot the Karakum Desert, and this was pre-1962's Lawrence of Arabia no less. This film is beautiful to look at. But its overwrought emotions and simplified ideologies may put off many. There is a bit of Russian melodrama and pre communism propaganda that is a bit disturbing. The whites are made to look like bourgeoisie officers performing acts of unjustified brutality while the Reds as under-supplied and struggling in the face of insurmountable odds fighting for freedom. Still, the propaganda is not too bad that it's nearly unwatchable. The acting is a little too melodramatic to buy into either being real people and their ideological differences are rather crudely sketched. While Maria acts like a man most of the first part of the film, it's time she spent with Govorukha that turns her back into a woman, until the final moments of the film, where she realize she is a soldier first. It's a great character development. The music is stunning as the use of children's choir singing is tear breaking and sweeps through the entire film. Overall: watch the film, and see how Maria must choice between being in love with Govorukha and her duty for her country. Watch her, as she is drawn into a moral dilemma that leads to a heart-rending ending. It's a good shot, that you like this movie as well.
  • Grigori Chukhrai's film, The Forty First, sets itself up to be understood as a mythic series of events; the opening scene's churning waves seem to take the viewer away to a different world and the narration sets the story in the post-Revolutionary Civil War. This narration gives the effect of a story being told, and the way the landscape is portrayed creates an unreal landscape. The colors always seem too saturated and the sky hangs close and heavy over the actors, giving the appearance of a fish bowl. Maryutka's inclusion in the plot attests to the Bolshevik ideal of gender equality, making a break with Stalinism's reinstatement of traditional gender roles; her being referred to as an "Amazon" enhances the mythic quality of the film. Chukhrai consciously constructs shots that juxtapose; the scene of Maryutka and the White Army lieutenant walking separate on the beach contrasts the two in space as they both walk in different points of the frame in different directions. The final scenes are obviously ideological: the dialogue is crafted as a metaphor for Tsarist Russia and Communist Russia, with the lieutenant (Tsarism) pleading Maryutka (Communism) to return to how they were before the fighting; the officer's dangling cross necklace is an ever-present symbol of Imperial Russia, designating that even when all visual indicators of partisanship are gone (as he and Maryutka's uniforms have been destroyed by the elements), there is still an irreconcilable difference present. The last scene illustrates the valuation of duty over emotions. Besides the smartly handled ideology, the visual effects are The Forty First's strengths. The color palette and the contrasts it creates are striking, and create a hazy, dreamlike world in which a legend is played out.
  • Much can be said about the range of emotions found in today's movies. They've certainly become better at promoting a cool atmosphere, adrenaline rushes, making plots that are cleverly built up to a climax, and fitting in as many square centimetres of skin as possible into the film. Some emotions are, however, totally, and I mean totally, disregarded. Intense melancholy, an intense sense of longing and sensations of intense pity for the characters are now nowhere to be found. This movie has all of that in spades, making it radically different from today's European and American movies. It is more "theatrical" than today's more "realistic" films, but for God's sake, don't let that put you off. An incessantly beautiful soundtrack sweeps through the entire film, and the pictures are stunningly beautiful, though in a Russian way that can simply be labelled "different". This film was an eye-opener to the fact that I've seen so many movies that ultimately have left me nearly indifferent to the fate of the characters, and to some loose theory that melancholy and pity are closely related. Everyone should hunt this movie down. The ending will haunt you forever. Anything you watch afterwards will seem like ridiculous attempts to give you cheap thrills.
  • 1966nm22 September 2003
    Warning: Spoilers
    One of the very best films of Soviet cinema,has little propaganda and a lot of sentiment, in a story that takes place during the soviet revolution. Boy meets girl, in the worst possible time, although, it is the war that unites them. They belong in different sides, but the new era makes their love possible. But duty comes before love in the Soviet cinema, so the end is sad but beautiful, and actually you can't imagine the film with a different ending. I don't want to forget that the cinematography is perfect and the artistic direction of the best kind. One of my favorites!
  • Vincentiu19 October 2013
    wise use of close-up.wonderful images. pure poetry. a special vision about war and love. all of that makes it more than propaganda tool but an impressive expression of profound art. it is a film about values and beauty, choices and ideals. realistic, cruel, full of subtle symbols - the desert, the isle -, mark of a great director and science of nuances from two impressive actors. the story is only basic point for respect the ideological commands. but the skin of this nucleus has the rare virtue to make it more than piece of a period. the final dialog between lovers , the end, the boat in storm and near the isle, each is a precious ingredient for an universal message about duty and choices, far to basic triumphal message of regime.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The Forty First is pretty much a Soviet Romeo and Juliet. Romance aside, the film offers some praiseworthy elements cinematographically. While detail-oriented aspects of Soviet montage are absent, some long shots of Red soldiers stumbling through desert dunes have a desolate beauty, and scenes in a small Kazakh village are wonderfully authentic. However, bulk of the story takes place in aesthetically blank isolation, where romance and ideology can clash beyond of the confines of armed conflict. Like Chapaev, The Forty First introduces the Whites through a prisoner of war. Unlike Chapaev though, and in a step away from Stalinist film standards, the captured counterrevolutionary lieutenant is unrepentant, and yet still a sympathetic character. The Red and White forces as a whole are depicted in the typical fashion; the Whites as lofty bourgeoisie officers performing acts of unjustified brutality, the Reds as under-supplied and struggling in the face of insurmountable odds. However, the prisoner, Lieutenant Otrok, is merely a wealthy intellectual. Otrok pines for the loss of his pedagogic comfort, not the fall of the monarchical system, and in this sense he is a relatable character. He is apologetic for the conditions that caused the war, and views his captors with good natured derision rather than hatred. We are treated to a well crafted, if utterly predictable, romantic progression as the dogmatic sniper Maryutka, assigned to guard the prisoner, is slowly enchanted by Otrok's charm and intelligence. The film is not a story of bourgeois contamination, though, as Maryutka remains disgusted by the Lieutenant's detachment from the ideological issues of the revolution. The film ultimately determines that regardless of motivation and culpability, the proletariat and bourgeoisie are incompatible. Admittedly, the romantic progression at the center of The Forty First is unremarkable from a modern perspective. However, the film deserves praise for addressing the generally rigid revolutionary genre in a novel and more liberal manner.
  • This is a very nice story, love and war story. This is a war movie without violence. In all the movie you see only three shoots. A great end for a great movie. It shows that war films can be done without blood everywhere.
  • A brave comrade falls in love with an imperialist pigdog during the Russian revolution.

    I wanted to see this for the wonderful, flawless photography from my favourite-ever cinematographer Sergey Urusevskiy, (The Cranes Are Flying, I Am Cuba). It's in colour, which perhaps lessens the power of the images a little, but is still very beautiful and unusual to look at, like a series of faded polaroids flickering past.

    As is common in Soviet films from around this time, the story itself is so rigidly hemmed in by the brutal regime it was made under that there's nothing believable or relatable about any of the characters, who never seem fully human for more than a few moments at a time, and much more like stenciled figures in a propaganda poster.

    It picks up in the final half hour, but the ending is never in doubt, where the final message has to be that politics and war are more important than humanity and love, which is a strange and rather unpleasant takeaway from something presented as a love story.
  • rebe_afaro17 October 2015
    Warning: Spoilers
    The Forty First is a film about two star-crossed lovers who meet a tragic end as a consequence of the time period in which they belong. Set in the years during the Russian Civil War, the film follows Maryutka a red army soldier whose group captures Vadim, a cadet for the white army whom she eventually develops feelings for after connecting with him on a deeper level. The opening credit scenes with its roaring waters and its gloomy music catches the attention of the viewer immediately with its foreshadowing of the tempestuous times to come. The film is more adapted to what films are today so it is easy to become engrossed in it. There are very notable differences in the style of directing within this movie as opposed to the films that were produced during the Stalinist time period. For example, the characters all seem much more individualistic and express their opinions more openly. Of course considering the nature of the film, it being for propaganda purposes, there are still pro revolutionary ideals presented through the unwavering determination that Yevsyukov has to continue for the sake of the revolutionary cause and of course the ending scene in which Maryutka gives the ultimate proof of where her loyalties lie. There is a good use of the space around the characters which turns out to be a great cinematic tool. There are shots of both the arid dessert and the tempestuous sea. It manages to capture both its beauty, as Maryutka noted when comparing it the sea to Vadim's eyes, and its power of destruction when it killed two men and stranded them on the island. The whole storm scene was strategically captured through different angles and distances, further exemplifying the success of this story as a film. Despite the ending which was both astonishing and expected, this film was enjoyable to watch. With all of its elements it ends up being a haunting tale.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Taking place during the Russian Revolution this movie focuses on a female sniper, Maria Filatovna, who is fighting for the Red Army and Vadim Govorkha, who is fighting for the White Army. As the movie progresses they eventually form a deeper relationship when they are stranded on an isolated island after their boat is capsized in a sudden storm on their way to the Red Army headquarters. However, this changes when at the end of the movie a boat approaches their island carrying White soldiers. As Vadim goes to rejoin them Maria shoots him in the back, and finally claims her forty-first kill.

    The ending of this movie was surprising, but overall not unexpected. This film is obviously propaganda and there is not much that hides that fact. There are many shots within this film that speak to this fact, one of them being the opening shot in which the soldiers faces are indistinguishable from each other as they traverse through the desert, which helps emphasize the unity of the Red Army troops. The portrayal of both the Red and White Armies also emphasizes the propaganda element of the film. The Whites are portrayed as the classical bourgeois oppressors that care only for themselves, while the Reds are portrayed as the underdogs who are fighting for the people. The wide sweeping shots of the desert establish the difficulties that the Red Army is fighting against, not just in the form of the environment, but in the form of the ideals as well. However, the most dramatic scene that speaks to this being propaganda is the choice Maria makes at the end of the film. When Maria shoots Vadim in the back at the end of the film it is obvious that she does this because of her loyalty to the Red Army and their ideals. The fact that Maria chooses her duty over her love for Vadim reiterates the overall tone of the film. This movie is a very good war film and the romance of Maria and Vadim makes it even more enjoyable.
  • Watching this I was reminded of Hollywood Westerns of the mid-1950s, with the saturated color and framing of faces for psychological effect. The constant orchestral score was sometimes unnecessary and somewhat annoying; but as an interview with the director points out, the idea wasn't a grim war story, or even a political screed, but a love story, where sweeping music isn't out of place; and this is a love story.

    The scenes with the nomads are striking and unforgettable; the desert sequences are also memorable, as is most of the film.

    Much of the acting could be considered somewhat overwrought, with people flinging themselves down on the ground and making exaggerated gestures, so much so it almost seemed a modernized film with silent movie performances.

    For those unfamiliar with the original novella, it may not matter, but the movie stays quite close to the story.

    Honestly, this movie does seem dated, but is well worth the time for several scenes of honest beauty and some decent-enough acting performances. And, I have to admit, while I watched the majority of the film with more or less dispassionate interest, I was unprepared for the rifle shot at the end. It's much, MUCH more shocking than I expected, and if only for that reason, this movie sticks in my head.
  • fran-6591northstar21 January 2019
    An outstanding piece of work, great color and lighting, straight forward story without the usual Hollywood junket attached proving again the skill of Soviet cinema making; very good ending.
  • Grigoriy Chukhray was in my opinion one of the great Soviet directors, and is underrated in the West. After Stalin died there was a creative thaw in the Soviet Union, and a few of these films were shown in the UK along with the unbanning of Eisenstein's ' Battleship Potemkin ' after far too many years. Along with ' Ballad of a Soldier ' ( a great, great film ) he made ' The Forty- First ' and it is visually and emotionally superb. War is still raging between Reds and Whites, and Izolda Izvitskaya is a woman sniper with the Reds who is given charge of guarding a handsome young white played by Oleg Strizhenov, and both are excellent in their roles. Slowly her passion develops for him, and finally it is reciprocated on an island which becomes at last a temporary peace, and a haven for their love. These scenes of tenderness and loving are astonishingly frank in their eroticism and beauty. It is quite simply one of the finest depictions of love in the cinema, and despite the rules of the outside world they create an idyllic space for themselves, fraught sometimes with political fights, and reconciled afterwards. This film has to my knowledge never been released on DVD but it can be seen on YouTube with English subtitles. I urge viewers to find it, and see yet again how uniquely powerful Soviet film can be at its best.
  • SofiCastle31 July 2019
    What a beautiful film. And the music score is unforgettable. I watch the film maybe 25 years ago; rewatched it today. Not only I remembered the plot, I also remembered the music. There are not many films of which I can say the same.
  • The feature debut of Soviet Union director Grigoriy Chukhray (who would subsequently acquire international fame for BALLAD OF A SOLDIER in 1959, his second feature), THE FORTY-FIRST is a potentially engrossing romance happens in the two warring parties during the Russian civil war, a Red Army sniper Maria (Izvitskaya) and a White Army officer Lieutenant Vadim (Strizhenov).

    The storyline is straightforward and linear, based on the eponymous novel by Boris Lavrenyev. Maria is among a defeated Red Army unit, leaded by Commissar Yevsyukov (Kryuchkov), she is a marks-woman, who has already claimed forty lives of her enemies. On their route to retreat in Karakum Desert, the group captures Vadim, aka. the titular forty-first which miraculously survives Maria's bullet, who is carrying a secret oral message to a White Army general, so they keep him as a captive and the Commissar puts him under Maria's guard. When they finally arrives at the Aral Sea, Maria and two other soldiers are entrusted to take Vadim on a boat to their headquarter in Kazaly, but stormy weather causes the boat stranded on a nameless island, and only Maria and Vadim have survived. The seclusion becomes a hotbed for their mutual affection which has engendered throughout their journey to bloom, Maria's nurturing nature, her passion for writing verses and aspiring to acquiring further education and Vadim's erudite knowledge, his "dangerous" blue eyes, bring them closer, not as sworn enemies, but two tender souls, a scintillating paragraph, where they finally embrace and smooch, after Vadim tells her the story of Robinson Crusoe and jokes that she is his "Man Friday". They share the most joyous time on the island, in spite of their ideological disparity of war and life, it is something they must adjust and reconcile for the sake of their love, and at one time, it seems working, they are frank to each other and decide to face the uncertain future together, a happy-ending beckons when a boat is approaching to rescue them, but the climax arrives so abrupt and emotionally manipulative in the coda, when the true identity of the boat is revealed, Maria's almost spontaneous reflex brings a poignant doom to the pair of star-crossed lovers, echoes the portentous title.

    From the gaping geographical shifting, starts in the desert, to the choppy Aral Sea, terminates on the isolated island, perpetually under an indigo shade, Chukhray emerges as a staunch craftsman in grappling with the diversity of locations, also revels in bestowing an ethnographic touch with its disinterested depiction of Auls people. More bracingly, considering it time, the film is pluckily against the grain of the propaganda exploitation in the Soviet industry at then, humanises the image of a White Army officer, and inspires audience to empathise the genuine affection regardless of their political beliefs, even though the ending could be read as a heroic feat of the loyalty to the Red Army, more resoundingly yet inconspicuously, one cannot help but becoming cognizant of the detrimental power which a radical code of belief can afflict on its subject, to brainwash them, to call on unconditional sacrifice with no bottom-line. Rather than arguing whether the Red or the White serves as the object of Chukhray's admonition, it seems to me, the real deal is the war itself, a diabolical act disguised as a manifestation of patriotism with disastrous outcome, but in essence, only capitalised on by those few warmongers for some elephant-in-the- room self-serving interests, yet, the same thing continues to repeat itself, again and again, no end is in sight. As for the film itself, my admiration is ample and well-grounded.
  • brogmiller7 November 2022
    Adapted by Boris Lavrenyov from his own novel, this moving tale of a doomed romance between a Red Army sniper and an officer in the White Army during the civil war which followed that peak of human insanity, the Russian Revolution, had been filmed to great effect by Protozanov in 1927.

    Thirty years on this remake enables director Grigori Chukrai to develop the relationship between Maryuta and Vadim more fully and with greater subtlety. She is played by the splendid but ill-fated Isolda Izvitskaya and he by the excellent Oleg Strizhenov who had impressed in 'Gadfly' the previous year.

    Influenced by Edouard Tissé, the cinematography by the great Sergei Urusevsky of land and seascape is utterly breathtaking whilst Nicolai Kyrukov supplies a powerful score.

    Not only is this an impressive directorial debut by Chukrai, it represents a turning point in Soviet cinema as this and his subsequent 'Ballad of a Soldier', not to mention 'The Cranes are flying' of Kalatazov, heralded a Golden Age freed from the shackles of Stalinism.
  • like many films from the same period, the poetry of image saves it from the ideological web. because the basic aesthetic virtues are only parts of a splendid love story in the time of war. because the story is just support for seductive images. a film about borders and feelings. honest, fresh, melancholic, bitter. but useful for discover the spirit of a slice of history and the art of a great director. for discover the nuances who are only fruits of each detail. and to meet two interesting actors. a film about war, hate, love and strange form of peace. and, sure, about the duty. as piece who defines the characters. the last scene remains a long time in memory. not only for the drama but for the profound poetry who transforms the political command in seed of a story after the film's story. a film about the most precious emotion. made in one of the most inspired manners.
  • sb-47-6087373 February 2019
    An exceptional movie - considering the production company (and country), it's ideology and even more so the writer and the period when the novel was written. I had assumed that it would be normal propaganda movie - instead of the Nazis/ Communists all black and stupid, it would be the other way, the White Czarists painted in black. To my delight it wasn't exactly that. The propaganda element, if it was there, was equally balanced on the views of the other side too. The movie getting passed through the iron hand, I could assume, was because the self-confidence of the Soviets at that time. They could afford to be a bit lenient, by hinting on the enemies psyche too, and that too a bit sympathetically - which naturally the insecure Hollywood couldn't afford to. There were of course a few minor forays, like "The Russians Are coming" but they didn't go to the subject in a serious way, like this one did. I really don't wonder it getting the prizes and nomination at Cannes, and would only say, it deserved. There isn't much at the story - the top sniper of the Bolsheviks, a girl, gets marooned in an island - and becomes Girl Friday to her captive a high ranking White Army Officer, carrying secret missives to the General. On the way to the Red bastion, where the Officer was to be interrogated and afterwards shot (something that happened to many others, including General Kolchak, referred to in the movie). The characters portrayed are completely human and the motives are completely natural, even in the end when the officer, despite professing his romantic associations - not only with the Red Girl, but also even before her, with the Red movement itself (from which, due to explained reasons, he was forced to side against), is overjoyed to find the distance sail belongs to his rescue party - the Whites. It is natural - since on the side of red, he was to undergo torture (interrogation), and then volley of Bullets, while he stood in front of a wall - a la Admiral Kolchak and many others in real life - and like most of them, he too would have been innocent of the crimes. However the girl, he could have managed to get a pardon, considering the power he yielded. The balance clearly tilted in favour of his rejoining the white. The end, might be heart rendering, but was the only possibility in people entangled in any war - where people, yearning for peace, who could have been friends or lovers end up in opposite sides of the fence.
  • A wonderful Soviet realistic implementation!

    This film is one of the most realistic in Soviet cinema! It is hard to believe that in the presence of Stalinist-type censorship, the screenwriter and director gave a realistic picture of the civil war, but really - completely realistic!

    The "Reds" are portrayed (including the main character) as dreamers of a new and beautiful world, but this is combined with a parallel cynicism and simplicity in their behavior - this was also the case in practice. The "Whites" (with the main character) are presented as more literate and more unsure of the proposed "bright future".

    The amazing thing is that a moral step forward was made in Soviet cinema: the love of a Bolshevik and a White Guard.

    I will not comment on the cinematography and direction - they are at a proven highest level. The acting is impressive!

    It is unbelievable that in "those times" and in the USSR, brand films were produced under the most difficult technical conditions, and now - under ideal conditions - we are buried with so much film kitsch!

    Classic is always fashionable!