User Reviews (2)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    Jacqueline Audry is a special case in French cinema:today ,her work is either disdained or ignored.Nevertheless she was ,along Ida Lupino,and long before Agnès Varda ,the only woman director of the era ;and like her American peer ,she often focused on female psychology .

    Based on Victor Margueritte 's novel ,it's the remake of a 1936 movie by Jean De Limur starring Marie Bell;another MTV work was made later starring the late Marie Trintignant.

    In the fifties ,the movie got a PG 18 .And the office Catholique Du Cinema forbade this immoral film to their flock.

    IMHO ,Audry's take on "La Garçonne"is superior ,in several respects ,to the thirties effort:not only because it was filmed in color ,but also because Andrée Debar was the ideal actress:a woman with an androgynous face ,the part was tailor made for her ;later Audry would cast her as the Chevalier D'Eon ,a spy in the pay of Louis The Fifteenth ,who,on his assignments ,used to dress up as a woman -in the movie,unlike what the historians say,the sexes are reversed.

    Andrée Debar gave up her actress career in the sixties and became a producer;really too bad for she was one of a kind.

    "La Garçonne ' begins as a traditional romantic drama : two families want their offspring to marry because of their business :Monique is an ingenue,a clueless girl,who believes in true love ,for her Fiancé is a handsome man ,and anyway at the time (early twentieth century) ,marriage is the only thing a decent girl must long for. When she discovers her future husband has a lover,she rebels against her bourgeois family and their money match :she will lead a free wild life .

    She will live like a man (check the title : "la Garçonne" = the male girl).soon she becomes the toast of the Gai Paris,sleeping with all the men around ,and even with a woman called Nichette -it was more explicit in the 1936 version ,and anyway a blond Arletty stole the show from Marie Bell in every scene she was in-:in both movies ,of course,the word "lesbian " is never uttered; a homosexual man appears in both movies too.

    As though it were not enough ,there are two scenes ,which must have horrified the Office Catholique: an (almost) naked male dancer ,which predates Playgirl by about 15 years,and a cabaret act ,showing an oriental sultan selling by auction chained beauties he whips :if this transparent metaphor of the women's submission is not clear enough,lesbian Nichette "buys" one of the slaves.

    As far as feminism is concerned,Audry did cleverer things earlier than Varda (the latter's "Le Bonheur" displayed a macho side as the victim was a woman).Monique is not a victim ;the way she treats her former fiancé defies conventions :she takes him to the daring places where she is at ease whereas he "wants to save her" : "save me? from what?" she defiantly replies .In the last part,there's a curious "Mise En Abyme " : La Garçonne ,and her friend ,a philosophy teacher -who possesses Sade's "Les 120 Jours De Sodome " in his collection of books - put on a play which tells her story ,in which the ex- fiancé is ridiculed :when he attends the rehearsals ,he is humiliated and soon led to despair.Sweet revenge indeed.

    The woman's lib side is more convincing in Audry's remake :okay,she will settle down ,but with the man she has chosen ,an intellectual twenty years her senior ,himself a rebel against the bourgeois society."My former fiancé is so awkward" she tells him when he tries to shoot them in a fit of anger.In a conventional story,the damsel in distress is forced to marry the graybeard whereas she loves the young romantic male lead ;but as her heroine,Jacqueline Audry was not born to follow.
  • jromanbaker18 September 2017
    The plot of this film is trivial and subversive at the same time. Director Jacqueline Audry appears to have a fascination for things queer; 'Olivia' is quietly Lesbian, and 'Huis Clos' is one third Lesbian. Both these films however had superior actors than 'La Garconne' which according to certain taglines is about a 'woman living as a man'.

    The main character is a romantic heterosexual who flirts with the 1920's club scene where, disillusioned by a boring 'straight down the line' straight man who cheats on her, she becomes 'liberated'. This means that statuesque Andree Debar (no great actress unlike Feuillere and Arletty as Lesbians in the other Audry films) plays her character coldly as a visitor to planet diversity and does not act with conviction. She has a female lover (discreetly). There is a young man who appears to be bisexual and is prone to male striptease, and a few other admirers including an ageing professor who writes a play about her life. She glides across the surface of transgression with an appalling lack of any sexuality and the only time she succeeds is a cigarette smoking moment where strangely Debar is at her sexiest. The end I will not reveal except to say that she looks her best when the tepid plot is resolved.

    What makes this film truly important however is its concentration on the gay scene of the 1920s. Lesbians come out better in representation than the men who like men who are presented in images of effeminacy and uselessness whereas the women really make their presence known. This is especially true in one scene where the main lesbian character buys a woman at a night club auction which could come straight out of a Hollywood Arabian Nights. She then goes off with her female companions to enjoy the bought woman (off-screen). Later, in counterpoint to the rigidly straight ending, she sings a torch song to women who are truly 'garconne'. She is the best character in the film and really 'out' unlike the Debar character who tries to strut freedom but ends up - well, no spoilers but it is tragically conventional. Proust is also mentioned and in a way this is a sort of third rate 'Sodom and Gomorrah'. And yet I praise the film for its audacity. It was made in the late 1950s in a repressive France. Like England it was for adults only, but it was shown uncut, whereas in more repressive England it had to be cut for its X certificate. (I expect it was the auction and the male striptease that went.) But for those who want to see the '50s do the Paris gay scene of the '20s this is a must. I give it 10 for, as I said, its audacity, at a time when absolutely no openly queer characters appeared in French film. I also cannot imagine this film having been made in Hollywood or England whose films of the time had all the 'maturity' of 'Doctor in the House'.

    Audry is to be saluted as a woman director who dared to do what the males refused to do, including the straight down the male and female line of the Nouvelle Vague.