User Reviews (38)

Add a Review

  • I remember my acting teacher years ago talking about this movie and saying, boy, Kim Novak really thought she was ACTING.

    "Jeanne Eagels" is a highly fictionalized biography of the great stage star who also acquitted herself well in films before her death at the age of 39. Directed by George Sidney, the movie also stars Jeff Chandler as Satori. His character existed, under another name, and unlike in the film, Eagels was married to him for a time. Virginia Grey has a small but showy role as a has-been who gives Eagels a script she wants to do, Rain, which turns out to be Eagels' signature play. That entire incident never happened (exceot of course that Eagles did play Sadie Thompson), but it provides some good drama in the film.

    The main problem with this film is the atrocious acting of Kim Novak and Jeff Chandler. Novak was just getting started in her career, and she was the whole package - incredibly beautiful, a body to die for, a sultry speaking voice, and star quality. This type of scenery chewing dramatic role just wasn't her thing. She has such a lovely quality in Picnic; later on, she would do well in comedies and lighter films. Why Harry Cohn thought she could do this is beyond me. Chandler is way, way over the top - he did better in straightforward leading man roles.

    A disappointing directing job from George Sidney. Novak deserved better. It's to her credit that she gave it a go. Thankfully, it didn't hurt what turned out to be a fine career.
  • ... with Kim Novak as the famous stage and screen actress. The film charts her beginnings as a dancer in a carnival run by Jeff Chandler, to her eventual conquest of the Broadway stage, with the assistance of imperious acting coach Agnes Moorehead. Eagels develops a drug and alcohol problem along the way. Also featuring Gene Lockhart in his final film role. Frank Borzage also cameos as himself.

    Like most Hollywood biopics, this is more fiction than fact. The weight of the story lies on Novak, who's not the kind of actress to do this part justice, although she tries. She also shows off a lot of skin, so fans of her pulchritude will enjoy that, at least. There are a few sensationalist scenes that push things towards out-right camp, but not enough to make this a must-see. Eagels' family sued Columbia over the way Eagels had been depicted in the movie

    Jeanne Eagels was in a number of silent films and in a couple of talking films. She was nominated for Best Actress for her part in "The Letter" and that talking film survives.
  • Young waitress from Kansas City in the early 1920s hitches up with a traveling carnival with the fervent, starry-eyed hope of breaking into show business; once in New York City, she gets herself a drama coach and lands a plum part in a Broadway show after the original actress falls ill. Fabrication of real-life Broadway and silent movie starlet Jeanne Eagels is useless as a biography but rather entertaining as a backstage melodrama. Kim Novak is uneven in the lead, mercurial and brittle (and occasionally quite amusing when lapsing into a haughty European accent once she finds fame and fortune), however the part is a pretty good fit for Kim and she fills the bill. Jeff Chandler (as a fictitious lifelong beau) and Agnes Moorehead (as the drama coach who suddenly morphs into Jeanne's best friend and nursemaid) are both solid, as is Charles Drake as an ex-football player who marries Jeanne apparently for her money (yet seems to love her and puts up with her). Drake also played a role in "Valley of the Dolls", which mirrors this film in several ways (there's even one character called "Neely" and another named "O'Hara"!). Producer-director George Sidney takes great care in setting up this story, which is snappy and brash and looks fantastic in black-and-white. Not everyone will go for the picture's mix of hard-shelled pathos, booze-soaked blackouts and rags-to-riches clichés, yet the film manages to capture the excitement of stage life quite vividly. **1/2 from ****
  • This is truly a movie worth viewing, if only for the chance to see KIM NOVAK portray another talented actress, the late Jeanne Eagles. Kim's acting is superb, although the screenplay is a tad flat. Agnes Moorehead gives her usual fine performance, and Jeff Chandler does he usual stiff acting routine. I do think that Jeanne's story should be re-told in an updated version, but until then, this movie captures that time frame of the 1920's very well. It would have been nice to view in color, but the black and white print lends itself well to that time era. All in all, an entertaining film, and a rare chance to see Kim Novak in a Hollywood-bio piece. Wouldn't it be nice if this movie were on DVD?
  • It's early 20th century. Kansas City teen waitress Jeanne Eagels (Kim Novak) spends her last dollar to join the circus. She's desperate and pushes owner Sal Satori (Jeff Chandler) to give her jobs at any level. Her eyes are set on Broadway. Eventually, her name is in the lights but she has to step on others to get there. Her career declines with alcohol and drug abuse.

    It's a biopic of silent star and early talkie actress Jeanne Eagels. It's a star vehicle for Novak. The material is melodramatic and she makes a meal of it. It would be more compelling to do less over-the-top melodrama. It does show that she is capable of wilder performances but she may have gone too far. It may be a backhanded compliment but this shows that Novak can actually act. Also, the movie can do more with her drug abuse problem. She also need to change her looks more. Her older looks are fine but her early looks need work. This is a functional biopic.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I was so fascinated by this woman's tragic life that I decided to look her up on the net. Sadly, I learned that maybe 30% was based on truth and the rest was a myth. I was very disappointed to learn that.

    My other issues were the inaccurate costume design by Jean Louis for that time period as I was with Helen Hunt for her hair style which did little to portray the real Jeanne Eagels.

    The entire first half with the carnival was a myth. She was a trained actress and had been acting since a very young age. I can understand changing the name of the Princeton Football star to protect his innocence because of their volatile relationship.

    The fact she died of an alcohol and drug overdose was correct but the where and when was inaccurate.

    Overall, I loved the picture, until I went to do the research and I found it to be really disappointing.
  • I saw this film only once, when I was a kid, but I still remember it, and I loved it. I have been hoping to see it again someday and am disappointed that it is not available even on video. Not only was Kim Novak, she of the lavender blonde hair, gorgeous, she was really just right for this movie. The story was interesting too. Yes, I know, TRUTH is hardly the most valued element in screen biopics, but since I knew nothing about Jeanne Eagels then (and, indeed, know little now--let's face it, there isn't a whole lot of information about her available) it was fascinating to see a story about an actress in the 1920s. Yes, somebody should do a more realistic remake, but put this one out too. Whether the story is factual or not, seeing Kim in the role is a reward in itself. I really can't think of an actress today who could match Kim's performance--she might be more like the real Jeanne Eagels, but Kim Novak's Jeanne shouldn't be lost. Put out the DVD-- you've got one customer for sure. Here's hoping.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I saw this movie when I was a kid and waited with baited breath to see it again nearly forty years later. I should have skipped it. Hellacious acting, scene chewing by Miss Novak and a story that is nowhere near anything that happened in the life of Ms. Eagels. The only reason I watched it is because it was the last film Gene Lockhart appeared in and his role is so small that if you blink, you'll miss him. (He comes on at the 3/4 mark as the Equity Board President.) It's so totally fictional they have Kim Novak in the last scene singing a song and dancing in a movie called "Forever Young", while Jeff Chandler's character sits blubbering like a total tool. (Eagels never made such a movie, nor did she ever make a musical. Her last movie was The Letter, where she played a murderess.) There is also a very offensive racist scene where Eagel's football player husband (some truth here, as her husband Ted McCoy was a college football player) is showing some black kids outside the studio where she's making a silent film (another fictional film she never made) how to hold a football and he tells them "to hold it like a watermelon". And this film was made at the beginning of the Civil Rights Movement! It's a shame that Universal holds the rights to Eagels' final film The Letter. (made by Paramount...Universal holds the rights to all of the pre-1950's movies.) Modern movie goers will never have a chance to see the real Jeanne Eagels and will have to settle for this fictional dreck of a motion picture and assume it's the gospel truth.
  • "Jeanne Eagels" can almost be considered a "lost" film, since it is so rarely seen nowadays. That seems a shame. Yes, it suffers from standard "biopic" problems (cliched script, superficiality, etc.), but it is an interesting curiosity piece. Kim Novak, fresh onto the acting scene, actually acquits herself quite well in the role. There is an air of the troubled woman about her from the beginning, and the way she keeps adopting different personas shows Jeanne's desperate search for an identity. Contrary to the other reviewer here, I think that the drunk scenes are quite effective, without ever being pretty or played for comedic purposes. She succeeds in making Jeanne unlikable at times, which is a brave choice for the era. Unfortunately, the script and direction aren't the best, and some of Novak's more interesting choices contrast with other scenes that just don't come off as well. It's definitely worth a look though. I would argue that Novak's style is more "modern" than many other actresses of the era. Whether she always succeeds or not, she clearly looks for the reality of each scene, and is less interested in acting and more interested in "being." There are moments when I think she comes close to "being" Jeanne Eagels, making this forgotten film worth a second look.
  • I just had the pleasure of watching "Jeanne Eagels" on Turner Classic Movies. It is a movie that I have wanted to see for over some fifty years. For some strange reason something always seem to come up to interrupt my viewing of this film, and this time the film was interrupted by a very brief power outage in our area. Unfortunately, even the power outage could not enhance the performance of one of my all time favorite actresses, Kim Novak. At first glance she appears to have all the physical equipment to be the perfect choice to play the film's tragic starlet i.e., she has all the looks that the role calls for, but she doesn't have the acting ability to pull it off! To my way of thinking, Miss Novak was best suited for romantic comedy ventures such as "Bell, Book and Candle" and "Boys Night Out", and "Pal Joey". Films like "Jeanne Eagels" and "Human Bondage" were in a sense "over her head" for they demanded that the actress possess the ability to make all necessary emotional transitions from the "cute" to the "cruel" that the role called for. Few actresses such as the likes of Bette Davis or a Joan Crawford possess this amazing ability to pull this cinematic miracle off. I couldn't help but wonder to myself as I watched this 1957 film as to what actress I would use to replace Miss Novak for the part of Jeanne Eagels. I immediately thought of the two "Harlow girls". Both Carroll Baker and Carol Lynley had played the role of Jean Harlow, in two 1965 films. After a brief consideration, I soon realized that they would be even worse than the physically endowed Miss Novak. Still… I drew a blank. Alas, the only stars that I could think of were now too old to play the role of the seductive siren, Jeanne Eagels. Having said that Agnes Moorehead, Jeff Chandler, Murray Hamilton are perfectly cast for their parts, the camera work was excellent, and the direction provided by George Sidney remarkable. I highly recommend this tragic, dark melodramatic "could have been a classic" for want of a capable leading lady… even with any cumbersome power outages that may occur.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    No dear readers this is not a great film and Kim Novak, trying hard as she does, cannot carry this movie to success. There are very few similarities to the real life of Jeanne Eagels who did actually make films including two talkies. I saw a MOMA screening of the 1929 "The Letter" and Eagels is AMAZING in it. Looks like a cross between Irene Dunne and Miriam Hopkins (though rather dissipated) and acts like a less mannered Bette Davis.

    I am always totally fascinated and charmed by Kim Novak though I know she isn't a very good actress. However she is very, very good when playing the girl next door who is aware of her sex appeal (Madge in "Picnic" for example) or a girl from the wrong side of the tracks on the make ("Pushover"). The early and totally fictional scenes of Jeanne Eagels as a carnival dancer trying to hustle her way from the sticks to the Great White Way, show a winning and convincing Kim Novak. She is sexy and has the right mixture of naiveté and calculation. However as the melodramatic story lurches into Fame and Misfortune mode, Kim and the movie slide downhill fast. Kim does a very bad drunk scene (Eagels' various drug addictions are only hinted at towards the last 15 minutes of the movie, alcohol is her main problem throughout the film) and she has many of them throughout the movie. Novak also doesn't convince as a sophisticated and accomplished Broadway star which is what Eagels was. She quickly becomes hammy and unconvincing and the script not only hurts her but accomplished actors like Agnes Moorehead and Charles Drake.

    Jeff Chandler who I also adore and am taken with, is also really bad in this. He does a labored and unconvincing Noo Yawk accent though I think he was a New York native. His work sometimes looks like a bad imitation of intense "method" performers like Brando. Nothing he does seems natural and he screws up his face to express emotions. He actually seems worse than Novak who often is rather blank and oddly clumsy.

    The script is terrible with real clunkers throughout. Just for historical reference, Eagels was never a carnival performer. She performed in tent shows as a teenager on the straw hat circuit where she met and married her first husband Morris Dubinsky. That marriage which may or may not have produced a child was over by the time she hit Broadway as an ingénue supporting the likes of Billie Burke and George Arliss. There was no "Elsie Desmond" and no "Sal Satori" either nor anyone really that resembled them in her life. "Jack Donohue" is her second husband Ted Coy who she did divorce.

    The death of Eagels happened as she was preparing to go out one night and collapsed in her apartment. She was rushed to a private clinic where she convulsed and died. Heroin was found in her system as well as alcohol and painkillers. In the movie Kim swallows a handful of pills while slinging down some hooch after nearly being raped by a vaudeville comic in her dressing room in Sal's Coney Island theater.

    The film ends oddly with a tear-stained Chandler watching on a movie screen the image of Kim Novak sing (dubbed by a mystery singer) and dance "I'll Take Romance" in a darkened theater. Though Eagels did appear in Ziegfeld shows and as a chorus girl in the teens, she was never a musical performer.

    The movie really has this attitude that Eagels shouldn't have wanted fame but seven babies with Sal and a house in Brooklyn. Ambition is fatal for women and they should stay home and take care of their men. Jeanne/Kim was ambitious and self-centered and had to be punished for wanting more. Her achievements aren't celebrated rather they are held against her.

    I don't really think this should be remade and if it is, tell a story that remotely resembles the truth.

    Anyway a major misfire.
  • OK....so this is not a classic film depicting the life of Jeanne Eagels however it has it's moments. First of all Kim Novak was a hot property at the time and she is gorgeous and oh so camp as Miss Eagels. Also captured in the film is the flavor of the era and the costumes are dazzling especially the one Novak wears as Princess Dardanella at a carnival where she gets busted by the police. The ultimate is when she prances on stage as Sadie Thompson in "Rain" to the tune of "Wabash Blues"....its actually a treat. Miss Novak is supported by a good cast including Jeff Chandler, Agnes Moorehead, Charles Drake, Murray Hamilton and especially Virginia Grey as has-been Elsie Desmond (one of Miss Grey's personal favorite roles).
  • Supposed story of actress Jeanna Eagels. She was big star on Broadway and went on to make a few movies (silents and talkies)...but her career was destroyed by her drug addiction.

    Since this is a Hollywood adaptation this is more than a little fictional. Characters and events that never happened are trotted out to make the story more dramatic. I can live with that though. It's also beautifully done and shot in stark black & white (which fits the mood of the story perfectly). The one big problem in Novak. In the right role she was perfect but she was way out of her depth with this one. She does try but she never pulls it off. I have nothing against Novak at all--I just thought she was very limited in terms of acting ability. She's not helped at all by Jeff Chandler (acting worse than usual) playing a totally fictional character that follows her all through her life. The only good acting comes from Agnes Moorehead who tears into her role and really kick starts the movie a few times. This isn't a bad movie but it's just not a very good one. I give it a 7.
  • mukava99130 September 2008
    It is amazing how badly Hollywood studios recreated past eras in their biopics. This atrociously dishonest and downright stupid movie about the great Jeanne Eagels is one of the worst. Only haphazard efforts are made to ground the story in the actual era (roughly the teens of the last century to 1929). Occasionally you can spot a few actors dressed and coiffed properly to the time depicted, but you have to look carefully to find them. The music veers between glossy 50s "smooth romance" to jarring, melodramatic accents which attempt to supply emotional power to scenes so badly written they would either put you to sleep or make you laugh. It goes without saying that poor Kim Novak in the title role is miles out of her league, not to mention miscast. Perhaps that's why the hacks who created the scenario decided to make her a carnival hootch dancer in the early scenes, just to show off her splendid physique - at the expense of the real story of a brilliantly talented midwestern girl who plunged passionately into serious acting before she was 10 years old and worked her way up to Broadway stardom over many years. Who would want to see THAT? Around 30 minutes into the implausible proceedings Agnes Moorehead shows up as a Broadway drama teacher; she makes a grand entrance and gives it all she's got and for a moment we feel the movie may be somewhat salvaged - but no. There is too much working against her. Eventually she too sinks into the torpidity surrounding her. For some incomprehensible reason half of the movie - which is supposed to be about a woman whose life played out in and around the legitimate theatre - is set in various amusement parks. Yes, we know that according to the writers of this abomination, Eagels was emotionally close to a carnival impresario (Jeff Chandler in a mighty but futile effort), but there is no other inherent connection between those settings and the story. The scenes that do take place in theatres are so ineptly conceived you wonder if the writers had ever set foot in such establishments. But the real crime here is that the life of Eagels is made boring in the extreme. It wouldn't be surprising if it were revealed that Jacqueline Susann had been inspired to write VALLEY OF THE DOLLS by this garbage; if not, then surely the makers of that movie must have studied it before their own cameras rolled in 1967. But at least DOLLS was hilarious.
  • Film follows Eagles' (Novak) rapid rise from carnival tease to Broadway celebrity to alcoholic decline.

    Novak's cavorting on the tiger skin rug in her hoochie-coochie outfit was used to promote the film at the time. Of course that merely accentuated her reputation as a blonde sex symbol, Columbia's rival to Fox's cheesecake queen Marilyn Monroe. Nothing wrong with that except the movie is a clear attempt at establishing Novak as a serious actress. Thus, the promotion is at real odds with the overall intent, which, I suspect, is the story of Novak's rather interesting career. It would take a few years for her to find her real movie niche, namely broad comedy farce, rather than the heavy drama of this film.

    One thing for sure—she has to run the full gamut of emotions in this obscure biopic. And she pulls it off pretty well, certainly getting an "A" for effort. The trouble is the film is over- long with a number of anti-climaxes and a screenplay requiring her presence in most every scene. So, when things slow down and get repetitive, as I think they do, Jeanne's (Novak) breakdown becomes tiresome as well. And that's too bad because a more economical script and more nuanced direction (Sidney) would have showcased the actress' efforts more effectively. As results stand, Novak is a so-so presence in a not-very-good film, which has since faded into understandable obscurity.

    (In passing—When Elsie (Virginia Grey) emerges suddenly from the shadows backstage, her gaunt features highlighted, it's a shuddery moment of authenticity for an under-rated performer amid the otherwise heavy emoting.)
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I think what especially deserves acknowledgement and is really underrated about 'Jeanne Eagels' (George Sidney, 1957) is the luscious black and white camerawork of four-time Oscar-nominated Robert H. Planck (1902-1971). This was his second-last film after working nearly thirty years as a photographer and director of photography for films. Interestingly, he also began his career in Hollywood in 1929 which is the same year that the real-life Jeanne Eagels (1890-1929) would sadly die of a heroine overdose. It can be argued that Planck's experience working in Hollywood in 1929 and his lived experience of growing up in the earlier part of the twentieth century allowed him to illustrate the visual textures of a nostalgic atmosphere in this film in a very sensory way.

    What is especially gorgeous is the scene where Sal Satori (Jeff Chandler) is wrestling in bed, trying to sleep, and hears Jeanne Eagels (Kim Novak) arriving at their Brighton Beach house after a night of Jeanne meeting with the press. Instead of entering the house, Jeanne immediately runs across the beach to take a dip in the ocean. The dark silhouette of Jeanne taking off her dress in the ocean breeze contrasted against the bright moonlight is a breathtaking cinematic image. This scene also includes shots of Jeanne and Sal laughing playfully and innocently amidst the glittering and glistening crests of the ocean waves. Visually, the scene is otherworldly as if in a dream that might only occur in the mind of one, like Planck, who could illustrate a different time because of the consciousness of one's memories of living through it. The camera cuts to a long and wide shot of the horizon, panning away from the shoreline with Jeanne's and Sal's dark silhouettes walking toward the beach house with the water sparkling on their wet skin and hair. It's no surprise that the majority of the most beautiful cinematography occurs in the scenes with Novak and Chandler, as their acting chemistry appears very strong and sensual throughout most of the film.

    In addition to the lighting, there is one scene where Sal is washing the grease off his face in Jeanne's Washington Hotel bathroom while she is speaking to Al Brooks (Larry Gates) in another room. She's telling Al that Elsie Desmond (Virginia Grey) wants Jeanne to star in her play, which is a lie that Jeanne is telling Al in hopes that she gets the lead role. A scene with less imagination would allow us, as the viewer, to only hear the voices of Jeanne and Al as Sal washes his face. However, the viewer gets to see the action between Jeanne and Al take place in a mirror on the opened bathroom door while Sal washes his face and listens along with us. It's a nice camera choice to keep the viewer engaged with the actions and reactions of all characters present in the scene.

    Another scene that has some interesting camerawork is when Jeanne arrives back at Sal's Coney Island carnival to tell him that she plans to marry John Donahue (Charles Drake). They stand in front of a large rollercoaster foundation, which dwarfs the two, and is comprised of a typically complicated structure of hundreds of crisscrossing wooden posts. The rollercoaster and its crisscrossing wooden foundation juxtapose nicely with the ups and downs and entanglement, respectively, of Jeanne and Sal's romance.

    I'd also like to acknowledge the elegant wardrobe tailoring of the cast, particularly of Jeff Chandler. I especially loved the elegant tuxedo ensemble with the sheen of the satin and silky fabrics of the lapels, handkerchief, buttons, bowtie, cuffs, and vest that he wears during the Kansas City Beauty Contest scene where Sal and Jeanne encounter each other for the first time. Jeff Chandler has a scrumptious physique and fills his wardrobe nicely!

    Although I do agree with some user reviews that Kim Novak was better in starring roles that require acting subtilties of "being" rather than "larger-than-life" starring roles that require specialized acting techniques, her performance in this film is still enjoyable to watch. My personal favourite Kim Novak films include 'Strangers When We Meet' (Richard Quine, 1960), 'Picnic' (Joshua Logan, 1955), 'Pushover' (Richard Quine, 1954), and 'Middle of the Night' (Delbert Mann, 1959), in that order, which are films that really provide a chance for her to showcase a natural style of acting and suits her very well. Fans of the film 'Jeanne Eagels' will also likely enjoy 'Pal Joey' (1957) and 'The Eddy Duchin Story' (1956) which also star Novak, are also directed by George Sidney, and also focus on themes and lives of those in the performing arts and entertainment industries. Also included in 'Jeanne Eagels' are some fine supporting roles from Agnes Moorehead and Virginia Grey. If you can focus on the visual beauty of Planck's cinematography and actor chemistry between Novak and Chandler, without getting too wrapped up with the facts of the life of the real Jeanne Eagels, then I'm confident you'll be able to enjoy this film.
  • mossgrymk28 March 2021
    Guilty pleasureville. 'Bout three fourths as good as "Mommie Dearest". Best things about it (in no particular order) are the darkly glittering black/white cinematography of Robert Planck that captures the mood of the title character's world, Kim Novak's spirited performance which veers into camp but never into boredom, maybe the best theatrical meltdown scene ever committed to celluloid and the wonderfully tawdry New Years Eve in Gothic Hollywood scene which manages to tap into the "Locust" zeitgeist without the pretension of Schlesinger's film or West's novel. Bad things center around the overacting of Jeff Chandler who usually wasn't guilty of this sin so I'm assuming director George Sidney counseled him to "play it like Brod Crawford", the none too scintillating dialogue that surprisingly flows from the typewriters of three of the 1950s better movie (and non movie) scribes; Daniel Fuchs (of "Low Company" fame), John Fante (of "Ask The Dust" fame )and Sonia Levien (of "Interrupted Melody" fame) and a general sense that whenever Novak's not onscreen the movie is gently stinking up the place. Give it a B minus.
  • Richard Harrison, who later went on to star in many Hercules / Gladiator type movies, can be seen at min. 49 and min 66. He is wearing an army uniform and appears in the "stage play" of RAIN within this movie. A few minutes of Fame for an actor that also did countless Westerns, Ninja and Adventure movies. Watch for him and check out his winning SMILE. Everybody has to start someplace.
  • Hollywood has always had a real problem with biopics. Most of them are factually laughable (Night and Day, Words and Music, Rhapsody in Blue, W.C. Fields and Me, Gable & Lombard, etc.)... the best of the bunch might be 1942's Yankee Doodle Dandy and 1955's Love Me or Leave Me (with Doris Day as Ruth Etting), but even they play fast and loose with facts. Jeanne Eagles is utterly frustrating. It features a top notch director, George Sidney and top notch period set design. Icy Kim Novak, who looks right for the title role, is all over the map. Some of her scenes are merely competent, in too many others she's chewing scenery (reminding me of Elizabeth Berkley's god-awful performance in 1995's Showgirls). Her performance was severely panned in the contemporary press reviews--- in my opinion, justified. The film gets a few things right: Eagles' 18-month Actor's Equity suspension, roughly sketches her rocky marriage to ex-football hero Ted Coy (here transformed as "John Donohue") but emphasizes Eagles' alcoholism over her wildly suspect heroin addiction. Many other facts are ignored (Eagles was never a carnival performer, and she'd been previously married). Interestingly, a reference to her "taking dope" is only mentioned once in the film, by Eagles herself. Most seriously, the script errs in attributing her death at age 39 as a suicide. Jeanne Eagles was undoubtedly a mess and a polyglot substance abuser, so in a perverse way it's fitting the movie suffers a similar fate. Kudos to art directors Bill Kiernan (who later did Funny Girl and The Cowboys) and Alfred E. Spencer; their work substantially contributed to making this watchable. Novak would recover and go on to immortality in Vertigo. Co-star Jeff Chandler (his part is total fiction and he's somewhat miscast here) would make 11 more films only to die unexpectedly of blood poisoning after back surgery in 1961 while his final film was in post production. Jeanne Eagles is not the worst biopic you'll ever see... it just should've been so much better with another star (Kim Stanley perhaps?). 4/10.
  • Although Jeanne Eagels is a fascinating film with one of two career roles for Kim Novak, the other being Vertigo, it does do some disservice in telling the story of the legendary Jeanne Eagels, Broadway star of the Twenties. The Roaring Twenties was a hard partying era, especially on women as three of the brightest stars of that era, Marilyn Miller, Helen Morgan, and Jeanne Eagels died way to soon because they indulged too much.

    That part of the story is all too true, Jeanne went like Elsie in the title song from Cabaret, from too much pills and liquor. What's not true is the fact that Jeanne was basically a raw talent who came to Broadway out of nowhere and then died. Eagels did pay her dues in a long hard road in stock companies. The character that Jeff Chandler plays is based on someone she did actually marry, one of the heads of a touring company, not a carnival barker. Her second husband played by Charles Drake was a Broadway playboy and former All American football player.

    The surviving members of the Eagels family did threaten suit against Columbia Pictures for this film. From what I've researched about Eagels she got a whitewash in this picture.

    Kim Novak does a great job playing Eagels, a woman who indulged too much in her life. She picked Jeff Chandler for her leading man in Jeanne Eagels. This was Chandler's first picture after finishing up his exclusive contract with Universal Studios. His new contract was non-exclusive and this was his first outside film. Jeff dusted off his Brooklyn accent for his role as the carnival man who loves Jeanne, but stands by helplessly as she self destructs.

    Agnes Moorehead plays Jeanne's acting coach and Larry Gates her overwrought producer. This film was the farewell performance of Gene Lockhart who has a brief scene as the presiding member of an Actors Equity Hearing. Eagels got herself in lots of problems with Equity back in the day because she blew off performances. Lockhart was active in Equity and essentially is playing himself.

    There is one other really good performance, a very touching one by Virginia Grey of a fading Broadway star who also dissipated herself. The role is great, but of course it has no basis in fact, Eagels did not 'steal' the play Rain away from this woman or anyone else.

    Jeanne Eagels is a fine film capturing the essence of a self destructive star of a bygone era though factually it leaves quite a lot to be desired.
  • Jeanne Eagels was a great Broadway actress of the 1920's and an absolute sensation in the play "Rain". She went to Hollywood and made a handful of films but soon succumbed to drug and alcohol problems. Kim Novak, gorgeous though she was, on her best day wasn't a blip on the acting screen compared to Eagels, even though when used right she could be effective, as in "Picnic". Here she has the total film in her incapable hands - courtesy of Harry Cohn of Columbia with whom she was rumored to be having an "affair". Novak's drunk scene is one of the worst and most embarrassing ever on film. The script itself is the usual Hollywood baloney with passing reference to fact. See it only to gaze in disbelief at that atrocious drunk scene. And then turn to the IMDb reviews of Joan Crawford in "Rain".
  • It is always a reliable pleasure to see Jeff Chandler on screen in whatever role he may be playing, here he is the luna park director of beauty contests, merry-go-rounds, roller-coasters and other crazy pleasures, when he is approached by a very annoying lady with towering ambitions to become an actress to the least. He is more or less forced to take her on, they become partners, but her ambitions soon separate her from him, while he remains faithful and is always ready to take her back. Her stage progress reaches awesome heights while her instability and liability of lacking self-discipline brings her into a chaotic roller-coaster of a stormy career, The turning point is when she encounters Nellie Desmond, a famous actress on her way down, who sees Kim Novak as her last chance of a come-back and offers her a play ("Rain" on Maugham's short story, filmed in 1933 with Joan Crawford) which she accepts and makes her own, ignoring Nellie Desmond. Jeff Chandler observes the foul play and warns her, but not even he can ultimately save her.

    It's a normal the-other-side-of-Hollywood story with terrible ups and downs, the acting and direction is superb, so is the wonderful music all the way, so I can not agree with all the objections to this film. Kim Novak perhaps overacts at times, but that's part of the character she is playing. Agnes Moorehead is as impressing as ever, while the backbone and stamina of the film is Jeff Chandler, one of Hollywood's most likeable actors ever.
  • This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. I remembered enjoying this movie when I was young. Now I know that all I enjoyed really was the theme song. Kim Novak is gorgeous, but the acting is uniformly dreadful. The direction and editing are unbelievably bad. She is a chronic drunk and then is suddenly completing a movie with no explanation of how this could come about. She is found at the scene of a suicide, at the very moment the person jumped(!) and is questioned by police. This scene went nowhere. The matter was just dropped and never heard about again. I could go on and on, but I think these things alone are enough to stay away. It is not campy enough to be funny. Miss Novak's drunk scene is rivaled in terrible acting only by Eileen Heckart in The Bad Seed. Agnes Moorehead and Jeff Chandler turn in their usual awful performances.
  • The 1957 "Jeanne Eagles" film is a fictionalized biography. Taking lots of clichés, (A bit of "All about Eve," "I'll Cry Tomorrow," etc.) this 1950's soap opera script falls flat. Kim Novak is unbelievable, overacting throughout the whole film. The direction makes all the actors seem stereotyped, even the talented Agnes Moorehead. Jeff Chandler's accent was laughable. The black and white film looked like it was on a low budget. The real Jeanne Eagles was a great actress,(her two sound motion pictures prove it) so this film struck me as an insult to her memory. I hope someday Ms.Eagles life may be made into another movie which has more truth and quality.
  • tnewell25 November 2005
    Jeanne Eagels was one of the best movies Kim Novak made. The chemistry between Jeff Chandler and herself was superb, storyline was excellent and the final falling star scene at the conclusion of this movie was tastefully done. Surprised a remake has not been attempted since this movie premeiered in 1957. Unfortunately this film was soon forgotten, and I have rarely seen any re-runs of it on television, which is a shame. Agnes Moorhead as usual was superb in her role along with Charles Drake. Comments have been made about Jeff Chandler being miscast in his role, but in my opion he diversified well in his role, considering how many other roles he attempted, this role was similar to the one he played in Stranger In My Arms with June Allyson.
An error has occured. Please try again.