13 reviews
In the middle 1950s two film versions of Hugo's best remembered novels appeared and disappeared very quickly in movie houses. This French version of "Les Miserables" was one. The other was a French/Italian version of "Notre-Dame De Paris/The Hunchback of Notre-Dame". That one starred Anthony Quinn as Quasimodo and Gina Lollabrigida as Esmarelda. Both films were actually quite good, and were the best straight versions of the novels to try to get most of the stories onto the screen. However, both were too long for most audiences, especially this version of Les Miserables. This ran over three hours. As pointed out in the other review that I wrote about the 1935 version of Les Miserables, that film version is the best normal screen length film version. But the performance of Jean Gabin as Jean Valjean in this film is superior to the performance of Fredric March in the same role. I would also note that the performance of Bourvil as Thenardier is the best I've seen (even better than Ian Holm's in the 1978 version). Thenardier is an even slimier villain than Javert is, but Javert's single minded pursuit of Valjean in the novel makes the antics of Thenardier look secondary, and they are usually dismissed in the filmed versions (though not in the musical version). Check out the scene where Thenardier and his goons kidnap Valjean for ransom, and the latter demonstrates how tough he is effectively thwarting the plan. It does not appear in the 1935 version.
- theowinthrop
- Mar 18, 2005
- Permalink
To me, the best versions of Les Miserables- a literary classic, and "the great French novel" for a reason- are the ones from 1935, 1978 and especially 1934. Apart from some draggy pacing, staid directing and the very unexciting barricade scenes, this film was still very good and as an adaptation is better than the 1952, 2000 and especially 1998 adaptations. The film looks very detailed and beautiful if at times too clean, and the photography is very skillful and mostly fluid(if clumsy at times in the scenes with the barricade). The music is haunting and dynamic and occasionally playful, while the script is very literate and maintains the brusque nature of Hugo's prose and the story is faithful in spirit to the book with some parts expanded on like with Valjean and Javert- though things were changed to accommodate the age difference between the actors- and Valjean and the bishop, which none of the other adaptations or even the book for that matter did. The storytelling is still poignant and the message of the book is there and it resonates. Of the cast the standouts are Jean Gabin, Bernard Blier and Bourvil. But that is not to dispute Daniele Delorme as a touching Fantine and while Béatrice Altariba achieves some pathos if not being entirely successful at overcoming Cosette's blandness. Gabin is a noble and understated Valjean with a lot of charisma and emotion, his change from immorality and redemption is portrayed very convincingly. Blier's Javert is cold-blooded, obsessive, strong-principled but there is vulnerability and a conflicted side he brings to Javert as well, which stops him from becoming too much of a one-dimensional antagonist. Bourvi's Thernadier is very slimy and funny, one of the best in the role actually, he manages not to be too sadistic or buffoonish, for a comic-villain role that Thernadier is those are a danger and Bourvil doesn't fall into that trap. In conclusion, a very good film and adaptation but from personal perspective it's not a first choice. 7.5/10 Bethany Cox
- TheLittleSongbird
- Nov 28, 2013
- Permalink
This version of the famous novel of Victor Hugo I found very suitable in general, with good acting and a narration, which give a real idea of the book. As I said several times several films never coincide with their original written versions, but this time the director Jean-Paul Le Chanois made a good effort in having a material as much similar to the book. Jean Gabin, for me the best all-time French actor, plays a good role as Jean Valjean seconded efficiently by Bernard Blier as Javert and several other French and Italian actors/actresses. I am sure that not all should agree with the opinion given here by me, but it depends how you feel about Hugo wrote. Misery is shown not only materially but spiritually as a sign of decaying society.
- esteban1747
- Jun 27, 2004
- Permalink
Being a diehard Les Miserables fan, I first learned the musical and then read the book. The musical, though wonderful, was nothing in comparison to the book; there was just so much material in the book that it couldn't all be put in the musical. In this movie adaptation, however, much effort is made in accuracy to not only the plot of Victor Hugo's novel, but the atmosphere and characters. Scenes are filmed as near to where they actually took place in the book as possible, and characters reflect the Hugo's original intentions. The plot is concise enough to be understandable, but full enough to give the viewer a true sense of Hugo's message. Overall, it is a wonderful adaptation and an excellent film.
- ailurophile
- Oct 29, 1999
- Permalink
Jean-Paul Le Chanois,as anyone past infancy knows ,at least in France ,was the "Bête Noire" of the Nouvelle Vague .More than any other director,Godard and his clique were ruthless when they used to speak of him.Unlike Carné ,Duvivier,Clouzot and Grémillon- other victims of the Young Turks who were better than their persecutors anyway- ,he was never restored to favor even by the contemporary critics.Jean Tulard writes in the "Dictionnaire des Réalisateurs" ::" He represents the mediocrity of the fifties cinema (...)He made the worst of all "les Miserables" versions(..) " Objections to Le Chanois's version remained: the pictures are too clean,the characters (particularly Danielle Delorme's Fantine) seem well-fed .Bourvil is miscast as Thenardier:he is too gentle ,too nice to portray him successfully.Cosette is forgettable as a girlie,she is totally bland as Marius's love.How can a director be wrong with the famous scene of the doll,which every French schoolboy and every schoolgirl in my country know by heart? Such is the case here.Waterloo battle and the scenes on the barricades are not really exciting .(But Hossein's slow motions in the 1982 version starring Lino Ventura were not really an improvement on it.
On the plus side,Gabin is a good Valjean -he does not equal Harry Baur in the Raymond Bernard version though- and Bernard Blier is the best Javert I've ever seen.The Valjean/Javert relationship would inspire lots and lots of screenplays,"the fugitive" for instance.Also worthwhile is Silvia Montfort's portrayal of Thenardier's daughter:she easily outclasses Beatrice Altariba's Cosette.
People complain because there are scenes in the novel that were not filmed.Let's not forget that it's a mammoth novel:only a miniseries could do Hugo justice.And anyway it's better than the Liam Neeson version and its happy end.
NB:When the movie was released in France it was divided into two parts (called "epoques" (=eras)) which was the word they used at the time and the audience was invited to come back and thus pay twice to see the whole.
On the plus side,Gabin is a good Valjean -he does not equal Harry Baur in the Raymond Bernard version though- and Bernard Blier is the best Javert I've ever seen.The Valjean/Javert relationship would inspire lots and lots of screenplays,"the fugitive" for instance.Also worthwhile is Silvia Montfort's portrayal of Thenardier's daughter:she easily outclasses Beatrice Altariba's Cosette.
People complain because there are scenes in the novel that were not filmed.Let's not forget that it's a mammoth novel:only a miniseries could do Hugo justice.And anyway it's better than the Liam Neeson version and its happy end.
NB:When the movie was released in France it was divided into two parts (called "epoques" (=eras)) which was the word they used at the time and the audience was invited to come back and thus pay twice to see the whole.
- dbdumonteil
- Dec 24, 2006
- Permalink
I have seen numerous film adaptations of Les Miserables. This 1957 French version (directed by Jean-Paul Le Chanois) is the best one I have ever seen. I watched the version that was produced by The Bridgestone Group in 1992 with English audio (ISBN# 1-56371-044-7). It aligns closely with the plot of the novel, and the cinematography is outstanding.
- RobertUnderwood
- Apr 10, 2003
- Permalink
Classic French rendition with atmospheric production design, evocative cinematography in Technicolor Techniscope and awesome cast giving nice acting throughout. Set in 19th Century during Revolution of the Thirties , throwing over King Louis XVIII and taking over power Louis Felipe Orleans in 1830 and subsequent revolutionary fights for the French Republic . After facing poverty and a long time in prison for stealing bread for his starving relatives , convict Jean Valjean : Jean Gavin is freed . Later on , paroled Jean robs precious objects, and is detained but is reedemed for the kindness a bishop. After that , he carries out a prosperous life and is eventually appointed as a Mayor . But Police Inspector Javert : Bernard Blier finds out his true identity as he recognizes him and wants to bring him down . Along the way Valjean cares for an unfortunate prostitute named Fantine and adopts her daughter Cosette : Beatrice Altarriba taking her to París as his own child , and she subsequently falling for a student called Marius : Exposito, who has revolutionary ideas and joins the Revolution led by obstinate leader Enjoiras : Serge Reggiani . The pursuit consumes both men's lives and soon Valjean finds himself in the midst of the student revolution of June 1832 bursting after General Lamarque's death. The legend comes to life .
This known story Is nicely detailed , well paced , with a lot of incidents fitting to Victor Hugo's novel. As the plot follows faithfully the ordinary canon , as the ex-criminal relentlessly chased by the stubborn Javert , playing a cat and mouse game. Main and support cast deliver top-drawer performances . Jean Gavin is extraordinary as an ex-convicted who was imprisioned of a minor crime and spends the rest of his life mercilessly chased. While Bernard Blier is magnificent as the unrelenting and implacable policeman who pursues Valjean here and there . The ordinary comedian Bourvil here plays the extremely nasty and ambicious Thenardier . Beatriz Altarriba and Exposito perform the two lovers Cosette and Marius who are usually cared by Jean Valjean.
Other versions are the following ones : the classic Hollywood rendition Les Miserables 1935 by Richard Boleslawski with Fredric March, Charles Laughton , Rochelle Hudson, Sir Cedric Hardwicke. Les Miserables 1952 by Lewis Milestone with Michael Rennie , Robert Newton, Debra Paget. Italian version Les Miserables 1952 by Riccardo Freda with Gino Cervi, Valentine Cortese . Les Miserables 1982 by Robert Hossein with Lino Ventura, Jean Carmet, Michael Bouquet . Les Miserables 1995 by Claude Lelouch with Jean Paul Belmondo , Alexandra Martínez, Annie Girardot , Rufus, Jean Marais , Philippe Leotard . Les Miserables 2008 by Billie August with Liam Neeson, Geoffrey Rush , Uma Thurman, Claire Danes, Hans Matheson , Peter Vaughn . The lavish musical 2012 Les Miserables by Tom Hooper with Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, Amanda Seyfried , Anne Hathaway, Sacha Baron Cohen. And TV series Les Miserables 1978 by Glenn Jordan with Richard Jordan, Anthony Perkins , John Gielgud , Cryl Cusack, Flora Robson . And Les Miserables TV series 2018 with Dominic West, David Oyelowe, David Bradley, Olivia Colman , Lynn Collins , among others.
This known story Is nicely detailed , well paced , with a lot of incidents fitting to Victor Hugo's novel. As the plot follows faithfully the ordinary canon , as the ex-criminal relentlessly chased by the stubborn Javert , playing a cat and mouse game. Main and support cast deliver top-drawer performances . Jean Gavin is extraordinary as an ex-convicted who was imprisioned of a minor crime and spends the rest of his life mercilessly chased. While Bernard Blier is magnificent as the unrelenting and implacable policeman who pursues Valjean here and there . The ordinary comedian Bourvil here plays the extremely nasty and ambicious Thenardier . Beatriz Altarriba and Exposito perform the two lovers Cosette and Marius who are usually cared by Jean Valjean.
Other versions are the following ones : the classic Hollywood rendition Les Miserables 1935 by Richard Boleslawski with Fredric March, Charles Laughton , Rochelle Hudson, Sir Cedric Hardwicke. Les Miserables 1952 by Lewis Milestone with Michael Rennie , Robert Newton, Debra Paget. Italian version Les Miserables 1952 by Riccardo Freda with Gino Cervi, Valentine Cortese . Les Miserables 1982 by Robert Hossein with Lino Ventura, Jean Carmet, Michael Bouquet . Les Miserables 1995 by Claude Lelouch with Jean Paul Belmondo , Alexandra Martínez, Annie Girardot , Rufus, Jean Marais , Philippe Leotard . Les Miserables 2008 by Billie August with Liam Neeson, Geoffrey Rush , Uma Thurman, Claire Danes, Hans Matheson , Peter Vaughn . The lavish musical 2012 Les Miserables by Tom Hooper with Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, Amanda Seyfried , Anne Hathaway, Sacha Baron Cohen. And TV series Les Miserables 1978 by Glenn Jordan with Richard Jordan, Anthony Perkins , John Gielgud , Cryl Cusack, Flora Robson . And Les Miserables TV series 2018 with Dominic West, David Oyelowe, David Bradley, Olivia Colman , Lynn Collins , among others.
- timcon1964
- Dec 20, 2020
- Permalink
The worst of the four versions I have seen. Gabin is dull, uninspired--and look at the director, Le Chanois, no more than a journeyman when an artist is required for one of the great classic novels. Bourvil is excellent as the supreme hypocrite Thenardier, while Delorme has some touching moments as the unlucky Fantine.
You can pass this one up, watch Fredric March and Charles Laughton instead; Laughton gives another of his superb performances as Javert.
I have seen a number of film and TV adaptations of Les Miserables: this is by far the best. It has the required grandeur and outstanding performances by Jean Gabin (unbeatable as Jean Valjean), Bourvil (a very sly Thenardier) and Bernard Blier (a great Javert). Silvia Montfort is a striking Eponine. Quite long but doesn't feel it, it has enough scope to do justice to the story.
- jean-claude primeau
- Nov 10, 2002
- Permalink
There are so many fantastic adaptations of this book out there. This is not one of them. For me, the best ones are those from 1935 (starring Fredric March and Charles Laughton) and 1998 (starring Liam Neeson and Geoffrey Rush).
The majority of the English adaptations have the confidence to condense and take creative license with the story - in order to make it more appropriate for the film format - whereas the French adaptations stubbornly put all 1200 pages onscreen. This results in ponderously boring films of 4 hours duration. Whichever you prefer depends on personal preference, but I would recommend giving this one a miss.
Here is my ranking of all the adaptations I've seen: 1958<1982<1934<1978<2018<2012<1952<1935<1998
The majority of the English adaptations have the confidence to condense and take creative license with the story - in order to make it more appropriate for the film format - whereas the French adaptations stubbornly put all 1200 pages onscreen. This results in ponderously boring films of 4 hours duration. Whichever you prefer depends on personal preference, but I would recommend giving this one a miss.
Here is my ranking of all the adaptations I've seen: 1958<1982<1934<1978<2018<2012<1952<1935<1998
- lowefreddy
- Aug 31, 2020
- Permalink
the best version of a book like Les Miserable is an impossible mission. because this is the fate of a great novel. this adaptation has the gift to be correct. and memorable. and impressive. and each of this are more than precious virtues. because it is Les Miserable of Jean Gabin, Bourvil and Bernarb Blivier. because the atmosphere, the music and the respect for novel are admirable. because the spirit of one of the French literature masterpiece is preserved and presented in inspired manner. and this does the film more useful for the readers of the book of Victor Hugo because Jean Gabin gives a magnificent Jean Valjean. not only at the level of image but as wise exploration of the gestures, fundamental change and generosity. and Bourvil is Thenardier more than you imagine. a film who use the lines of text as impeccable clothes. so, not ignore it !
- Kirpianuscus
- Nov 25, 2016
- Permalink